Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 19 de 19
Filter
1.
J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg ; 29(3): 266-270, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38912032

ABSTRACT

Aims: To study the safety and feasibility of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol in pediatric colostomy closure. Materials and Methods: Retrospective observational study of children who underwent colostomy closure. Data were collected from the electronic medical records and telephonic follow-up calls of patients from October 2013 to October 2023, in the Department of Pediatric Surgery of a Tertiary level Medical College. The parameters obtained were age, gender, type of stoma, primary diagnosis, discrepancy in luminal diameters, time to reach full feeds, postoperative hospital stay, and complications. The protocol followed for colostomy closure included the following-no bowel preparation or nasogastric tube, no overnight fasting, single dose of antibiotic prophylaxis, avoiding opioids, packing proximal stoma till mobilization and starting early oral feeds postoperatively. The continuous parameters were expressed as mean ± standard deviation or median (range) while the descriptive parameters were expressed as number and percentage. Results: A total of 90 patients were included in the study. Most of the patients had colostomy for anorectal malformation. Five of them had significant luminal discrepancy of 4 or more times. Full feeds were reached within 2 days in 79 patients. Postoperative hospital stay was 2-3 days in 62 patients. Six patients stayed for more than 5 days, due to complications requiring further management. We noted surgical site infection in 6 patients all of whom were managed with regular wound dressings and fecal fistula in 4 cases, two of which resolved spontaneously. Conclusion: ERAS protocol in colostomy closure reduces the hospital stay and is cost effective, with early recovery and no added complications.

2.
World J Gastrointest Surg ; 16(3): 807-815, 2024 Mar 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38577084

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Ostomy is a common surgery usually performed to protect patients from clinical symptoms caused by distal anastomotic leakage after colorectal cancer (CRC) surgery and perforation or to relieve intestinal obstruction. AIM: To analyze the complications after transverse colostomy closure. METHODS: Patients who underwent transverse colostomy closure from Jan 2015 to Jan 2022 were retrospectively enrolled in a single clinical center. The differences between the complication group and the no complication group were compared. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to find independent factors for overall complications or incision infection. RESULTS: A total of 102 patients who underwent transverse colostomy closure were enrolled in the current study. Seventy (68.6%) patients underwent transverse colostomy because of CRC related causes. Postoperative complications occurred in 30 (29.4%) patients and the most frequent complication occurring after transverse colostomy closure was incision infection (46.7%). The complication group had longer hospital stays (P < 0.01). However, no potential risk factors were identified for overall complications and incision infection. CONCLUSION: The most frequent complication occurring after transverse colostomy closure surgery in our center was incision infection. The operation time, interval from transverse colostomy to reversal, and method of anastomosis might have no impact on the postoperative complications. Surgeons should pay more attention to aseptic techniques.

3.
Cureus ; 16(2): e54000, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38476811

ABSTRACT

This case report presents a rare occurrence of triplication of the sigmoid, an unusual congenital anomaly, in a nine-month-old male with a known history of anorectal malformation. The patient, previously diagnosed with anal atresia and a rectourethral (prostatic) fistula, was admitted for the closure of his divided sigmoidostomy as the final step in correcting his anorectal malformation. Unexpectedly, during the release of the distal stoma, the presence of three distinct bowel lumens was discovered. To discern the native bowel, catheters were introduced into each lumen before proceeding with the excision of the triplicated sigmoid and subsequent stoma closure. This case underscores the complexity of diagnosing and managing unusual GI anomalies in the context of anorectal malformations, emphasizing the challenges encountered during surgical interventions.

4.
Ann Afr Med ; 23(1): 25-28, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38358167

ABSTRACT

Background: Colostomy is one of the common surgical procedures performed in pediatric surgical practice. The aim of this study was to retrospectively review our experience with colostomy and closure (reversal) in children. Patients and Methods: A retrospective review of the data of all children aged 15 years and below who had colostomy and colostomy closure in the past 5 years. Results: Of the 67 children who had colostomy 42 (62.7%) boys and 25 (37.3%) girls, with an age range between 13 months and 8 years. Fifty-six (83.6%) of the children were <2 years. Anorectal malformation 53 (79.1%) was the common indication. Divided colostomy was performed in 62 (92.5%) patients and loop colostomy was performed in 5 (7.5%) patients. All the patients had intraperitoneal colostomy closure. A complication rate of 26.4% was seen. Duration of hospital stay ranged between 4 and 10 days. No mortality was recorded. Conclusion: Colostomy reversal is a safe procedure but morbidity may ensure and can easily manage.


Résumé Contexte: La colostomie est l'une des interventions chirurgicales courantes pratiquées en chirurgie pédiatrique. Le but de cette étude était de revoir rétrospectivement notre expérience en matière de colostomie et de fermeture (inversion) chez les enfants. Méthode: Une revue rétrospective des données de tous les enfants âgés de 15 ans et moins ayant subi une colostomie et une fermeture de colostomie au cours des 5 dernières années. Résultats: Sur les 67 enfants ayant subi une colostomie, 42 (62,7 %) garçons et 25 (37,3 %) filles, avec une tranche d'âge comprise entre 13 mois et 8 ans. Cinquante-six (83,6 %) des enfants avaient moins de 2 ans. La malformation ano-rectale 53 (79,1 %) était l'indication fréquente. Une colostomie divisée a été réalisée chez 62 (92,5 %) patients et une colostomie en anse réalisée chez 5 (7,5 %) patients. Tous les patients ont eu une colostomie intrapéritonéale fermée. Un taux de complications de 26,4 % a été observé. La durée du séjour à l'hôpital variait entre 4 et 10 jours. Aucune mortalité enregistrée. Conclusion: l'inversion de la colostomie est une procédure sûre mais la morbidité peut être assurée et peut être facilement gérée.


Subject(s)
Anorectal Malformations , Colostomy , Male , Child , Female , Humans , Infant , Colostomy/adverse effects , Colostomy/methods , Retrospective Studies , Intestine, Large , Anorectal Malformations/surgery , Anorectal Malformations/complications , Morbidity , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology
5.
Colorectal Dis ; 25(7): 1523-1528, 2023 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37161645

ABSTRACT

AIM: This paper describes a robotic approach to combined gastrointestinal continuity restoration and complex abdominal wall reconstruction after Hartmann's procedure complicated by large midline and parastomal hernias. METHODS: A robotic Hartmann reversal is performed, followed by robotic retromuscular abdominal wall reconstruction of all ventral defects with bilateral posterior component separation using the double-docking approach. Surgical steps are thoroughly described, and the accompanying video highlights critical steps of the procedure, anatomical landmarks and technical details relevant to successful completion. RESULTS: Complete restoration of the anatomy was achieved with an operative time of 6.5 h. Mobilization occured on day 1, and bowels were opened on day 3. Surgical discharge was possible on day 5. No intra-operative surgical complication occurred and follow-up at 6 months showed no recurrence or mid-term complication. CONCLUSION: Combined minimally invasive reconstruction of the gastrointestinal tract and abdominal wall was feasible using a robotic system. In addition, potential advantages of postoperative rehabilitation and reduced surgical site complications are suggested. Prospective evaluation of the technique is ongoing.


Subject(s)
Abdominal Wall , Abdominoplasty , Hernia, Ventral , Robotic Surgical Procedures , Humans , Abdominal Wall/surgery , Abdominal Muscles/surgery , Hernia, Ventral/surgery , Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods , Abdominoplasty/methods , Herniorrhaphy/methods , Surgical Mesh/adverse effects
6.
J Pediatr Surg ; 58(4): 716-722, 2023 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36257847

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Mechanical bowel preparation (MBP) is largely used worldwide prior to colostomy closure in children, although its benefits are questioned by scientific evidence, and its use can cause adverse reactions. We hypothesized that colostomy closure procedures in children are not associated with increased complications (surgical site infection [SSI] and anastomotic leakage) when performed without MBP. Thus, we conducted a noninferiority trial to compare the safety and efficacy of colostomy takedown with and without MBP. METHODS: A randomized noninferiority clinical trial was conducted at Hospital Infantil de Mexico in Mexico City from 2015 to 2019, in which the experimental group did not receive MBP prior to colostomy closure. A total of 79 patients were analyzed, and the primary outcomes were safety-related. Data were analyzed using the chi-squared test, Student's t-test, or Mann-Whitney U test as appropriate. RESULTS: The demographics in both groups were comparable. Statistical analysis revealed equivalence in safety outcomes (superficial SSI, 22.5% vs 15.3% p = 0.420; deep SSI, 7.5% vs 0% p = 0.081; reoperation, p = 0.320; intestinal occlusion, p = 0.986); no anastomotic leakage was observed in any group. Secondary outcomes such as fasting time and length of hospital stay after surgery were also similar between the groups. However, patients who received MBP were admitted 2 days before surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that withholding MBP prior to colostomy takedowns in children is not associated with increased complications. Omitting MBP also leads to less discomfort and shortens hospital length of stay, suggesting that it has safer and more effective procedures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Randomized controlled clinical trial with adequate statistical power.


Subject(s)
Colostomy , Preoperative Care , Humans , Child , Preoperative Care/methods , Surgical Wound Infection/etiology , Anastomotic Leak/epidemiology , Anastomotic Leak/etiology , Anastomotic Leak/prevention & control , Antibiotic Prophylaxis , Elective Surgical Procedures/methods
7.
Pediatr Surg Int ; 38(12): 1701-1707, 2022 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36098796

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Pediatric colorectal studies have shown enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols can safely improve outcomes. This study sought to determine the impact of an ERAS pathway on the outcomes of children with colorectal conditions who underwent colostomy closure or Malone procedure. METHODS: A single-institution, retrospective cohort study of children who underwent colostomy closure or Malone procedure between 2016 and 2020 was performed. Differences in outcomes between pre-ERAS and ERAS cohorts were tested. A sub-analysis based on procedure type was performed. RESULTS: There were 96 patients included: 22 prior to ERAS implementation and 74 after. Patients who underwent ERAS had shorter mean time (hours) to oral intake, mean days until regular diet, post-operative opioid volume, and median length of stay (p < 0.05). There was no difference in complication rates in the ERAS and pre-ERAS cohort (12.2 vs 9.1%, p = 0.99). Patients who underwent colostomy closure after ERAS had lower post-operative opioid use, but no differences were seen in those who underwent Malone. CONCLUSION: Implementation of an ERAS protocol resulted in quicker time to oral intake, normal diet, and decreased opioid use without increasing complication rates. Differences seen based on procedure type may reflect that the effect of an ERAS protocol is procedure specific.


Subject(s)
Analgesics, Opioid , Colorectal Neoplasms , Humans , Child , Retrospective Studies , Length of Stay , Colostomy , Colorectal Neoplasms/complications , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology
8.
Rev. cir. (Impr.) ; 74(4): 376-383, ago. 2022. tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1407939

ABSTRACT

Resumen Objetivo: El objetivo de este estudio es comparar los resultados perioperatorios del abordaje abierto (AA) con el abordaje laparoscópico (AL) para la reconstitución de tránsito (RT), y determinar factores de riesgo asociados a morbilidad posoperatoria. Material y Métodos: Se estudiaron pacientes consecutivos sometidos a RT entre enero de 2007 y diciembre de 2016 en nuestro centro. Se excluyeron aquellos con grandes hernias incisionales que requirieran reparación abierta simultánea. Se consignaron variables demográficas y perioperatorias, y se compararon ambos grupos. Además, se realizó una regresión logística para la identificación de factores de riesgo asociados a morbilidad posoperatoria en la serie. Resultados: Se realizaron 101 RT en el período. Se excluyeron 14 casos por hernia incisional, por lo que se analizaron 87 casos (46 AA y 41 AL). Diez pacientes en el grupo AL (24,4%) requirieron conversión, principalmente por adherencias. La morbilidad total de la serie fue de 36,8%, siendo mayor en el AA (50% vs 21,9%, p = 0,007). Hubo una filtración anastomótica en cada grupo. La estadía posoperatoria fue de 5 (3-52) días para el AL y 7 (4-36) días para el AA (p < 0,001). En la regresión logística, sólo el AA fue un factor de riesgo independientemente asociado a morbilidad posoperatoria (OR 2,89, IC 95% 1,11-7,49; p = 0,029). Conclusión: El abordaje laparoscópico se asocia a menor morbilidad y estadía posoperatoria que el abordaje abierto para la reconstitución del tránsito pos-Hartmann. En nuestra serie, el abordaje abierto fue el único factor independientemente asociado a morbilidad posoperatoria.


Introduction: Hartmann's reversal (HR) is considered a technically demanding procedure and is associated with high morbidity rates. Aim: The aim of this study is to compare the perioperative results of the open approach (OA) with the laparoscopic approach (LA) for HR, and to determine the risk factors associated with postoperative morbidity. Material and Methods: Consecutive patients undergoing HR between January 2007 and December 2016 at a university hospital were included. Patients with large incisional hernias that required an open approach a priori were excluded from the analysis. Demographic and perioperative variables were recorded. Analytical statistics were carried out to compare both groups, and a logistic regression was performed to identify risk factors associated with postoperative morbidity in the series. Results: A hundred and one HR were performed during the study period. Fourteen cases were excluded due to large incisional hernias, so 87 cases (46 OA and 41 LA) were analyzed. Ten patients in the LA group (24.4%) required conversion, mainly due to adhesions. The total morbidity of the series was 36.8%, being higher in the OA group (50% vs. 21.9%, p = 0.007). There was one case of anastomotic leakage in each group. The length of stay was 5 (3-52) days for LA and 7 (4-36) days for OA (p < 0.001). In the logistic regression, the OA was the only independent risk factor associated with postoperative morbidity in HR (OR 2.89, IC 95% 1.11-7.49; p = 0.029). Conclusion: A laparoscopic approach is associated with less morbidity and a shorter length of stay compared to the open approach for Hartmann's reversal. An open approach was the only factor independently associated with postoperative morbidity in our series.


Subject(s)
Humans , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Colorectal Neoplasms/surgery , Laparoscopy/methods , Colorectal Surgery/methods , Laparotomy/methods , Postoperative Complications/physiopathology , Anastomosis, Surgical/methods , Colorectal Neoplasms/mortality , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Chi-Square Distribution , Survival Analysis , Laparoscopy/adverse effects , Colorectal Surgery/adverse effects , Laparotomy/adverse effects
9.
Transl Pediatr ; 10(1): 153-159, 2021 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33633947

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Mechanical and oral antibiotic bowel preparation (MOABP) has been performed routinely before colorectal surgery in children, but the necessity was questioned recently. We evaluated the utility of MOABP in children with Hirschsprung's disease (HSCR) undergoing colostomy closure and pull-through. METHODS: The medical records of pediatric patients with HSCR who underwent colostomy closure and pull-through in a single center from January 2010 to January 2020 were reviewed. The use of MOABP was noted. The incidence of postoperative complications, duration of postoperative antibiotic therapy, total hospital cost and length-of-stay were compared between patients receiving MOABP and no bowel preparation (NBP). RESULTS: A total of 64 patients were included in the study: 33 received MOABP and 31 had NBP. The respective postoperative complications in the MOABP and NBP groups were: intra-abdominal infection (18.2% vs. 29.0%), wound infection (9.1% vs. 16.1%), anastomotic leak (0 vs. 0), intestinal obstruction (6.1% vs. 0) and enterocolitis (3.03% vs. 12.90%). The duration of antibiotic therapy was 4.91±4.21 and 5.23±3.77 days (P=0.75) and hospitalization was 18.21±7.26 and 16.26±6.63 days (P=0.27) respectively. The total hospital cost in the MOABP group (4,720.14±1,858.89 USD) was higher than in the NBP group (3,749.06±2,009.97 USD) (P=0.049). CONCLUSIONS: We did not find any clear benefit of MOABP in children with HSCR before colostomy closure and pull-through. However, a multicenter randomized controlled trial is needed to more definitely determine the best preoperative approach for children with HSCR.

10.
J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg ; 25(5): 291-296, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33343110

ABSTRACT

AIM OF THE STUDY: The aim of this study is to assess the role of early feeding after elective colorectal surgery in children and compare the outcome of feeding practice early versus traditional feeding. STUDY DESIGN: A randomized controlled, single-center study was conducted over a period of 3 years (November 2015-October 2018) at a tertiary care center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients (n = 147), after colostomy closure (as elective colorectal surgery), were randomly selected for postoperative feeding initiation and were divided into two groups, namely the control (traditional feeding) group and study group (early feeding). In early group, feeding was initiated on the postoperative day 1 after the removal of nasogastric tube (removed after 16 h of surgery). Postoperative hospital stay and complications were compared among them. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Data were tabulated and analyzed in Microsoft Excel 2010. RESULTS: Among 147 patients (boys[70] and girls [77]), the average age of colostomy closure was 4.36 years. Forty-five patients had early feeding and 102 traditional feeding. Average postoperative hospital stay was noted 5.62 ± 1.11 days for "Study group" and 8.1 ± 1.04 days for "Control group." Postoperative complications were found in 17 patients; 11 (7.5%) superficial surgical site infection (9 [8.8%] in control and 2 [4.4%] in study group) and 6 (4%) minor fecal fistulae (5 [4.9%] in control group and 1 [2.2%] in study group). None required any further surgical intervention. No mortality was reported. CONCLUSIONS: Early feeding initiation after elective colorectal surgery is safe, and postoperative hospital stay is significantly reduced. It is definitely a step forward in the era of fast track surgery in pediatric population.

11.
Clin Colon Rectal Surg ; 30(3): 172-177, 2017 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28684934

ABSTRACT

Temporary stomas are frequently used in the management of diverticulitis, colorectal cancer, and inflammatory bowel disease. These temporary stomas are used to try to mitigate septic complications from anastomotic leaks and to avoid the need for reoperation. Once acute medical conditions have improved and after the anastomosis has been proven to be healed, stomas can be reversed. Contrast enemas, digital rectal examination, and endoscopic evaluation are used to evaluate the anastomosis prior to reversal. Stoma reversal is associated with complications including anastomotic leak, postoperative ileus, bowel obstruction, enterocutaneous fistula, and, most commonly, surgical site infection. Furthermore, many stomas, which were intended to be temporary, may not be reversed due to postoperative complications, adjuvant therapy, or prohibitive comorbidities.

12.
J Med Life ; 8(4): 488-91, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26664476

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Despite patient selection, postoperative morbidity after reversal of Hartmann's procedure remains significant. AIM: The objective of this study was to investigate risk factors associated with morbidity after conversion of Hartmann's operation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data of 56 patients who underwent reversal procedures between January 2004 and May 2015 in a single center. We evaluated the following variables: demographic characteristics, medical comorbidities, etiology for Hartmann operation, preoperative lab values, intraoperative surgical details and short-term outcomes (hospital stay, medical and surgical complications, mortality). RESULTS: There were 37 men (66.1%) and the mean age was 57 years. The most frequent indications for Hartmann's procedure were colorectal cancer in 25 patients (44.6%) and complicated diverticulitis in 10 patients (17.9%). The mean time to the reversal procedure was 9 months. Morbidity rate was 16.1% (9 patients) with an anastomotic leakage rate of 3.6% (2 patients) and mortality rate was 3.6% (2 patients). The most common medical complication was diarrhea (4 patients, 7.2%). Bivariate analysis demonstrated that the only factor significantly associated with postoperative complications was presence of multiple comorbidities. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple medical comorbidities is the only predictive factor for postoperative complications after Hartmann's reversal and therefore patient selection for this type of surgery is critical.


Subject(s)
Digestive System Surgical Procedures/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Digestive System Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Morbidity , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
13.
Indian J Surg ; 77(Suppl 3): 1148-53, 2015 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27011527

ABSTRACT

There have been very few studies on applying fast-track principles to colostomy closures. We believe that outcome may be significantly improved with multimodal interventions in the peri-operative care of patients undergoing this procedure. A retrospective study was carried out comparing patients who had undergone colostomy closures by the fast-track and traditional care protocols at our centre. We intended to analyse peri-operative period and recovery in colostomy closures to confirm that fast-track surgery principles improved outcomes. Twenty-six patients in the fast-track arm and 24 patients in the traditional care arm had undergone colostomy closures. Both groups were comparable in terms of their baseline parameters. Patients in the fast-track group were ambulatory and accepted oral feeding earlier. There was a significant reduction in the duration of stay (4.73 ± 1.43 days vs. 7.21 ± 1.38 days, p = 0.0000). We did not observe a rise in complications or 30-day re-admissions. Fast-track surgery can safely be applied to colostomy closures. It shows earlier ambulation and reduction in length of hospital stay.

14.
Rev. bras. colo-proctol ; 28(3): 334-337, jul.-set. 2008. graf
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: lil-495299

ABSTRACT

O estudo pré-operatório do cólon para fechamento de colostomias em alça devido a trauma vem perdendo importância nos últimos anos. A necessidade de se avaliar as alterações anatômicas pós-traumáticas do cólon vai de encontro aos custos, desconforto e morbidade dos exames. OBJETIVO: analisar a real necessidade do estudo prévio do cólon no fechamento de colostomia pós-trauma. MÉTODO: foram analisados, retrospectivamente, 98 prontuários de pacientes, no período de janeiro de 2004 a janeiro de 2006, portadores de colostomia em alça confeccionada após traumatismo e que foram alocados em dois grupos: grupo A, composto de 32 casos com estudo do cólon e o grupo B, 66 casos sem estudo colônico prévio. RESULTADOS: 94,9 por cento dos pacientes eram do sexo masculino e a média de idade foi de 27 anos. O tempo de permanência da colostomia foi, em média, 32,8 meses, sendo o flanco esquerdo a localização mais comum em ambos os grupos. A morbidade geral foi de 7,1 por cento, sendo 3,1 por cento de complicações no grupo A e 9,1 por cento no grupo B (p=0,16) e sem mortalidade. A complicação mais freqüente foi hematoma da parede abdominal em cinco casos (5,1 por cento), e apenas um caso de infecção de ferida operatória (1 por cento), e mais um de deiscência de anastomose (1 por cento). CONCLUSÃO: o estudo pré-operatório do cólon para fechamento de colostomia feita após trauma colorretal é dispensável.


The pre-operative study of the colon before loop colostomy closure in trauma patients has been loosing its importance since last few years. The need of evaluating the pos-traumatic anatomic alterations of the colon goes against the costs and morbidity of the examinations. OBJECTIVE: to analyze the real necessity of the colon study before colostomy closure in trauma patients. METHODS: a retrospective study of 98 patients submitted to colostomy closure after trauma, from January of 2004 to January of 2006 was carried out. They were divided in two groups: group A, composed of 32 patients with previews colon study and group B, composed of 66 patients without it. RESULTS: 94.9 percent of all patients were male and the average age was 27 years old. The time interval between colostomy and its closure was in average 32.8 months. The left side location was the most common sight. Overall morbidity was 7.1 percent, being 3.1 percent in group A and 9.1 percent in group B (p=0,16). The operative mortality was zero in both groups. The most common complication was wound haemathomas (5,1 percent) and only one case of wound infection. Anastomosis dehiscence occurred also in only one case, from group B. CONCLUSION: the pre-operative study of the colon for loop colostomy closure in trauma patients is not necessary.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Adult , Colonoscopy , Colostomy , Enema , Ostomy
15.
Article in Korean | WPRIM (Western Pacific) | ID: wpr-175579

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The study aimed to investigate the complications accompanying stoma take-down and to elucidate the significant factors associated with complications. METHODS: We recruited 341 patients who underwent stoma take-down in our hospital between January 2000 and December 2005. Data on various complications during this procedure, i.e., wound infection, prolonged ileus, and anastomotic leakage, were collected with respect to patient- and operation-associated parameters. RESULTS: Complications of stoma take-down developed in 72 (21.1%) patients: 53 (20.3%) patients in a loop ileosotmy, 10 (21.3%) patients in a loop colostomy, and 9 (27.3%) patients in a Hartmann colostomy, The overall complication rate was significantly associated with the urgency of the primary operation (elective vs. emergent, 17.8% vs. 29%, P=0.017), and with the operation time ( 80 min, 16.5% vs. 29.3%, P=0.005). Among the complications, ileus developed in 46 (13.5%) patients, wound infection in 17 (5.0%) patients, and anastomotic leakage in 5 (1.5%) patients. Wound infection was related to the type of stoma between a loop ileostomy and a Hartmann colostomy (3.5% vs. 12.1%; P=0.014), but no other factors were associated with other complications. CONCLUSIONS: There were significant differences in overall complications in relation to urgency of the primary operation and the operation time, but there was no statistical difference in complications between a loop ileostomy and a loop colostomy take- down groups. The significance of these factors appears to be reduced with accurate surgical technique and patient care.


Subject(s)
Humans , Anastomotic Leak , Colostomy , Ileostomy , Ileus , Patient Care , Wound Infection
16.
Article in Korean | WPRIM (Western Pacific) | ID: wpr-35207

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: An anastomotic leak after resection of rectal cancer is a omnious complication. The diverting stoma is performed to avoid this serious complication. However, a diverting stoma and a stoma reversal are associated with significant morbidity and a small mortality. As stoma-related complications are associated with a delay of adjuvant therapy for advanced rectal cancer, minimal stoma-related morbidity is mandatory for rectal cancer patients. A safe and simple dissection of the stoma is known to be associated with less morbidity at stoma closure. Since in a loop colostomy of a not everted fashion, it is easy to construct and dissect the peristomal site at colostomy reversal, this study evaluated the usefulness of a protective loop colostomy of a not everted fashion in rectal cancer. METHODS: We reviewed the clinical records of 71 cases of loop colostomy closure for rectal cancer between January 1996 and December 2004. The clinical data, including indications for the stoma, the clinicopathologic features of the patients and their general conditions, the data for patients receiving adjuvant therapy, stoma-related morbidity, stoma-closure-related morbidity, and perioperative data were examined. RESULTS: Indications for stoma creation are the discretion of the surgeon (n=22), poor bowel preparation (n=21), unstable anastomosis (n=16), bowel obstruction (n=6), and anastomotic leakage (n=6). The stoma-related morbidity rate for a non-eversion colostomy was 5.6%. Morbidity events were peristomal erythema (n=2), prolapse (n=1), and parastomal hernia (n=1) requiring surgery. The stoma-closure-related morbidity rates was 9.9%. In the 45 patients undergoing adjuvant therapy, colostomy closure was performed during adjuvant therapy in 39 patients. Major complications, such as anastomotic leakage or abscess following reversal of the non-eversion colostomy, occurred in 1 of the 71 patients (1.4%). The average operating time and the blood loss for clostomy closure were 89.5 minutes and 202.3 ml, respectively. A simple closure of the loop colostomy was performed in 51 patients (71.8%). CONCLUSIONS: Based on our results, a non-eversion colostomy may be considered due to the ease of construction and reversal if a temporary diverting stoma for rectal cancer is indicated.


Subject(s)
Humans , Abscess , Anastomotic Leak , Colostomy , Erythema , Hernia , Mortality , Prolapse , Rectal Neoplasms
17.
Article in Korean | WPRIM (Western Pacific) | ID: wpr-84109

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to review the complications associated with ileostomy, colostomy construction and subsequent closure. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 74 patients with ileostomy and colostomy closure from August 1, 1995 to June 30, 1999. RESULTS: The complications of stoma construction occurred in 15 patients (20.3%) among 74 patients: skin problem in 10 cases, prolapse in 4 cases, and stoma necrosis, retraction and stenosis in 1 case, respectively. Factors such as age, underlying pathology, type of stoma did not contribute to the complications of stoma construction. Complications of stoma closure occured in 15 patients (20.3%): wound problem in 9 cases, enterocolitis in 4 cases and anastomotic leakage in 2 cases. With respect to stoma closure, only old age was associated with increased morbidity (P<0.05), rather than method of closure, time interval to closure, or type of stoma. Mean operation time for simple closure was 122.2 minutes and 204 minutes for resection and anastomosis. The mean hospital stay was 9.6 days for simple closure and 13 days for resection and anastomosis. CONCLUSIONS: The morbidity associated with stoma construction and subsequent closure was appreciable. There were no specific risk factors influencing the complications of ileostomy or colostomy construction, but old age increased morbidity after closure.


Subject(s)
Humans , Anastomotic Leak , Colostomy , Constriction, Pathologic , Enterocolitis , Ileostomy , Length of Stay , Necrosis , Pathology , Prolapse , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Skin , Wounds and Injuries
18.
Rev. Col. Bras. Cir ; 27(5): 298-304, set.-out. 2000. tab
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: lil-508317

ABSTRACT

Foi feito um estudo prospectivo e casualizado de 35 pacientes portadores de colostomias devido a lesões traumáticas do reto admitidos no Hospital Jõao XXIIII no período de novembro de 1994 a junho de 1997. O objetivo foi avaliar os resultados do fechamento precoce das colostomias nestes pacientes. Após o atendimento inicial, os pacientes foram sorteados de acordo com o número do registro de admissão em dois grupos: os do grupo 1 (N = 14) foram submetidos ao fechamento precoce da colostomia programado para o 10o dia pós-operatório do tratamento da(s) lesão(ões) e os do grupo 2 (N = 21) submetidos ao fechamento tardio da colostomia, programado para oito semanas após a operação inicial. Nos dois grupos, o restabelecimentodo trânsito intestinal somente foi realizado após o fechamento da lesão retal confirmado por um estudoradiológico contrastado. Houve um predomínio de pacientes jovens, do sexo masculino e vítimas de traumatismopenetrante. Todos eram portadores de uma colostomia em alça. A taxa global de complicações após o fechamento das colostomias foi de 25,7%, com a infecção de ferida operatória sendo a complicação mais freqüente (17,1%). No grupo 1, as complicações ocorreram em 35,7% dos casos e, no grupo 2, em 19,1% (p = 0,423). A análise dos resultados permitiu-nos concluir que a taxa de complicações, a duração da operação para o fechamento da colostomia e o tempo total de permanência hospitalar não apresentaram diferenças significantes entre os dois grupos. Os pacientes submetidos ao fechamento precoce (grupo 1) permaneceram apenas 10 dias em média com a colostomia, enquanto nos pacientes do grupo 2 a média de permanência com a colostomia foi de 66,3 dias (p< 0,001 - Teste de Kruskal-Wallis). Baseados nestes resultados, concluímos que os pacientes portadores de...


A prospective and randomized trial involving 35 rectal trauma patients who were colostomized, as part of their surgical treatment, was undertaken at the João XXIII Hospital, between November 1994 and June 1997. The aim of this study was to evaluate the early results colostomy closure in this patient population. Rectal trauma victims were assigned for two groups, according to their hospital number. Group 1: Early colostomy closure, on the 10th post-operative day, and Group 2, delayed closure, eight weeks after theinitial operation. A contrast study of the rectum was performed in all patients prior to colostomy closure, in order to confirm the rectal healing. The majority were young male victims of penetrating trauma. All patients were submitted to a loop colostomy prior to the colostomy closure. The global complication rateafter colostomy closure was 25.7%. Postoperative wound infection was the most commom complication (17.11%). Complications occurred in 35.7% of the cases in group 1 and 19.1% in group 2(p = 0,423 ). We concluded that there was no significant difference between groups regarding complication rate, operative time for colostomy closure, and total hospital stay. Patients undergoing early closure (Group 1) stayed with a colostomy for an average of 10 days, while patients from delayed closure (Group 2) had their colostomy for an average of 66.3 days (p<0.001 - Kruskal-Wallis Test). Based on our findings, traumatic rectal injury victms who have a colostomy as part of their surgical treatment, may undergo earlycolostomy closure on the 10th post-operative day, as long as no complication of the initial operation ispresent.

19.
Article in Korean | WPRIM (Western Pacific) | ID: wpr-198588

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To investigate the timing of colostomy closure and the associated risk factors that affect the development of complication after colostomy closure. METHODS: We have reviewed and analyzed the results of 28 patients with colostomy closure at the Kwangju Christian Hospital from January 1993 to December 1997. We investigated to associated literatures on this subject for timing of colostomy closure, preparing a patient for colostomy closure, suture technique, wound management, underlying disease process related to the incidence of complication and experience of surgeons. RESULT: Wound infection developed in 4 patients (14.4%). Anastomotic leakage occurred in one patient (3.6%). Small bowel obstruction developed in two patients (7.2%). Overall incidence of complication was 25%. The incidence of complications in patients with trauma who underwent colostomy was 44.4% and patients without trauma, 15.8%. Complication rate was 16.6% for loop colostomies and 40% for end colostomies. The morbidity was 40% for colostomies on the left side, 18.7% for transverse colostomies, and 0% for colostomies (2 ileostomies) on the right side. The morbidity rate for closures within 6 weeks for the initial operation was 50%; for those within 6 to 12 weeks, 8.3%; and for those after 12 weeks, 16.6%. CONCLUSION: The optimal timing of closure varies from patient to patient, but closure within 6 weeks of the initial operation significantly increased the morbidity. Colostomies on the left side are associated with a higher morbidity rate than transverse colostomies or colostomies on the right side.


Subject(s)
Humans , Anastomotic Leak , Colostomy , Incidence , Risk Factors , Suture Techniques , Wound Infection , Wounds and Injuries
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...