Radiographic complicated and uncomplicated descending aortic dissections: aortic morphological differences by CT angiography and risk factor analysis.

AIMS: To identify radiographic differences between patients with uncomplicated and complicated descending aortic dissections. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between April 2009 and July 2021, 209 patients with acute descending aortic dissections were analysed as complicated (malperfusion, rupture, diameter progress, and diameter ≥ 55 mm) or uncomplicated. Detailed CTA measurements (slice thickness ≤ 3 mm) were taken in multiplanar reconstruction. A composite endpoint (early aortic failure) was defined as reoperation, diameter progression, and early mortality. Seventy-seven patients were female (36.8%) [complicated n = 27 (36.5%); uncomplicated n = 50 (37.0%) P = 1.00]. Seventy-four (35%) patients were categorized as morphologically complicated, and 135 (65%) as uncomplicated. In patients with complicated dissections, the dissection extended more frequently to the aortic bifurcation (P = 0.044), the coeliac trunk (P = 0.003), the superior mesenteric artery (P = 0.007), and both iliac arteries (P < 0.001) originated less frequently from the true lumen. The length of the most proximal communication (entry) in type B aortic dissection was longer, 14.0 mm [12.0 mm; 27.0 mm] vs. 6.0 mm [4,0 mm; 13.0 mm] in complicated cases (P = 0.005). Identified risk factors for adverse aortic events were connective tissue disease [HR 8.0 (1.9-33.7 95% CI HR)], length of the aortic arch [HR 4.7 (1.5-15.1 95% CI HR)], a false lumen diameter > 19.38 mm [HR 3.389 (1.1-10.2 95% CI HR)], and origin of the inferior mesenteric artery from the false lumen [HR 4.2 (1.0-5.5 95% CI HR)]. CONCLUSION: We identified significant morphological differences and predictors for adverse events in patients presenting complicated and uncomplicated descending dissections. Our morphological findings will help guide future aortic therapies, taking a tailored patient approach.

Current management of acute type B dissection in 2021.

The rationale for thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for type B aortic dissection depends on the phase of disease: acute phase, which is 'complicated', subacute to early chronic phase, which requires 'preemptive TEVAR' and chronic phase, which entails 'prevention of further dilatation and rupture'. Low operative mortality and morbidity after TEVAR for complicated acute type B aortic dissection have been reported with significant improvement during midterm survival. 'Retrograde' type A dissection, which can be described as type B0,X (X>3) according to a new reporting standard, has reportedly been treated with TEVAR with less invasiveness. TEVAR is the first and possibly the only effective strategy for acute type B dissection, so that expansion of indications for type B0,X, as described in the new reporting standard has been validated.

Extended Stent Coverage Decreases Distal Aortic Segmental Enlargement After the Endovascular Repair of Acute Complicated Type B Aortic Dissection: A Multi-Center Retrospective Study of 814 Patients.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate the effect of distal aortic segmental enlargement (DASE) after thoracic endovascular aortic repair for complicated type B aortic dissection (cTBAD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: From March 2003 to October 2018, 814 patients with acute cTBAD from 5 medical centers were retrospectively identified. DASE is indicated as the enlargement of distal aortic segmental volume ≥1.6 fold of the preoperative volume compared with the most recent postoperative computed tomography angiography (CTA) scan. Of these patients, 635 (78%) were identified as non-DASE, and 179 (22%) were identified as DASE. Competing risk analysis was performed to compare late death and distal aortic reintervention between the groups. The morphological variables and false lumen thrombosis at 7 aortic levels were measured based on the preoperative CTA and the most recent CTA. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to assess the independent predictors of DASE. RESULTS: The mean follow-up time of the entire cohort was 5.6 years (interquartile range: 2.4-8.3 years). There were total of 208 late deaths, including 94 (14.8%) deaths in non-DASE group versus 114 (63.7%) deaths in the DASE group. Distal aortic reintervention was observed in 89 patients, with 43(6.7%) in the non-DASE group versus 46 (25.7%) in the DASE group. The cumulative incidence of late death and distal aortic reintervention were significantly higher in the DASE than in the non-DASE group (p<0.001). In morphological analysis, significant incomplete false lumen thrombosis was observed in all distal aortic segments above the aortic level of celiac artery (p<0.01). According to multivariate analysis, the Marfan syndrome, stent coverage to the level of diaphragm and the level of celiac artery were independent predictors of the DASE (p<0.001). Patients with extended stent coverage to the level of celiac artery have shown a lower incidence of DASE (p<0.010). CONCLUSION: Compared with the non-DASE group, patients with DASE demonstrated a higher rate of late death and distal aortic reintervention. For the cTBAD population, extended stent-graft coverage to the aortic section between diaphragm and celiac artery might serve as a "cost-efficient" cutoff point aiming to reduce the risk of DASE.

TEVAR for complicated and uncomplicated type B aortic dissection-Systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Type B aortic dissection (TBAD), is defined as a dissection involving the aorta distal to left subclavian artery with the ascending aorta and the aortic arch not affected. TBAD is classified due to the time frame and presence of complications. Complicated TBAD (co-TBAD) patients have a greater mortality rate than uncomplicated TBAD (un-TBAD) and thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is considered the gold-standard intervention for these clinical challenges. METHODS: We undertook a systematic review of the literature regarding TEVAR intervention in co-TBAD and un-TBAD. A comprehensive search was undertaken across four major databases and was evaluated and assessed until June 2020. RESULTS: A total of 16,104 patients were included in the study (7772 patients co-TBAD and 8352 un-TBAD). A significantly higher proportion of comorbidities were seen in co-TBAD patients compared with un-TBAD. Acute dissection was more frequent in the co-TBAD group (73.55% vs. 66.91%), while chronic dissection was more common in un-TBAD patients (33.8% vs. 70.73%). Postprocedure stroke was higher in co-TBAD (5.85% vs. 3.92%; p < .01), while postprocedural renal failure was higher in un-TBAD patients (7.23 vs. 11.38%; p < .01). No difference was observed in in-hospital mortality however the 30 days mortality was higher in the co-TBAD group. One-year survival was higher in the uncomplicated group but this difference was not observed in the 5-year survival. CONCLUSION: In our analysis we can appreciate that despite significantly higher comorbidities in the co-TBAD cohort, there was no difference in in-hospital mortality between the two groups and the 5-year survival did not have any difference.

The provisional extension to induce complete attachment technique is associated with abdominal aortic remodeling and reduces aorta-related adverse events after aortic dissection.

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the efficacy of the provisional extension to induce complete attachment (PETTICOAT) technique for type B and postoperative residual type B aortic dissections compared with the conventional thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) technique. METHODS: In this retrospective study, we compared sequential aortic morphologic changes in consecutive patients with type B and postoperative residual type B aortic dissections treated with the PETTICOAT technique between January 2016 and December 2017 with patients treated with the conventional TEVAR between January 2013 and December 2015. Outcomes included aortic remodeling and aorta-related adverse events for 2 years postoperatively. RESULTS: Forty-eight patients were included in this study (24 in the PETTICOAT group, 24 patients in the conventional TEVAR group). Although both groups showed aortic remodeling in the descending thoracic aorta, the PETTICOAT group developed significantly better aortic remodeling in the abdominal aorta compared with the conventional TEVAR group during the observation period. The PETTICOAT group had significantly fewer aorta-related adverse events compared with the conventional TEVAR group (8% vs 54%; P < .001). Aorta-related adverse events more commonly occurred in the poor remodeling group compared with in the good remodeling group (P = .001; hazard ratio, 8.32; 95% confidence interval, 2.26-30.64). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that the PETTICOAT technique for aortic dissection may promote aortic remodeling and decrease the incidence of aorta-related adverse events. Additional studies are required to confirm these preliminary findings.

Acute complicated type B aortic dissection during the New York City COVID-19 surge.

The impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in New York City (NYC) is dramatic. COVID-19 cases surged, hospitals expanded to meet capacity, and NYC remains the global epicenter of this pandemic. During this unprecedented time, a young woman with known Marfan syndrome presented with an acute complicated type B aortic dissection to our Aortic Center. Using the provisional extension to induce a complete attachment technique, we treated this patient and quickly discharged her the next day to decrease the risk of COVID-19 infection. Her progress was monitored using frequent phone calls and one office visit at two weeks.

Arc of Buhler: A lifesaving anatomic variation. A case report.

The presence of malperfusion syndrome in cases of complicated acute type B aortic dissection is a negative predictive factor and urgent intervention is indicated. Anatomic variations, such as the Arc of Buhler, contribute anastomotic channels and can preserve the visceral blood supply. In this case report, we describe the overall management of a 54-year-old man who presented with a type B aortic dissection. Initially, conservative management was chosen, as indicated for an uncomplicated type B dissection, but the dissection deteriorated. Despite the fact that severe occlusion of the celiac artery was detected on Computed Tomography (CT) angiography, the Arc of Buhler anatomical variation was present, contributing adequate visceral blood supply. After considering this finding, the patient was treated effectively with thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR).

A presença da síndrome de má perfusão em casos de dissecção aórtica aguda do tipo B complicada é um fator preditor negativo, e uma intervenção urgente é indicada. As variações anatômicas, tais como o arco de Buhler, contribuem como canais anastomóticos e podem preservar o suprimento sanguíneo visceral. Neste relato de caso, descrevemos o manejo geral de um paciente do sexo masculino, de 54 anos, que apresentou uma dissecção aórtica do tipo B. Inicialmente, o manejo conservador foi escolhido, conforme indicado para dissecção do tipo B não complicada, mas a dissecção sofreu deterioração. Apesar de uma oclusão grave da artéria celíaca ter sido detectada na angiotomografia computadorizada, a variação anatômica do arco de Buhler estava presente, contribuindo para o suprimento sanguíneo visceral adequado. Após levar em consideração esse achado, o paciente foi tratado de forma efetiva com reparação endovascular da aorta torácica.

Arc of Buhler: A lifesaving anatomic variation. A case report / Arco de Buhler: uma variação anatômica que salva vidas - relato de caso

Abstract The presence of malperfusion syndrome in cases of complicated acute type B aortic dissection is a negative predictive factor and urgent intervention is indicated. Anatomic variations, such as the Arc of Buhler, contribute anastomotic channels and can preserve the visceral blood supply. In this case report, we describe the overall management of a 54-year-old man who presented with a type B aortic dissection. Initially, conservative management was chosen, as indicated for an uncomplicated type B dissection, but the dissection deteriorated. Despite the fact that severe occlusion of the celiac artery was detected on Computed Tomography (CT) angiography, the Arc of Buhler anatomical variation was present, contributing adequate visceral blood supply. After considering this finding, the patient was treated effectively with thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR).

Resumo A presença da síndrome de má perfusão em casos de dissecção aórtica aguda do tipo B complicada é um fator preditor negativo, e uma intervenção urgente é indicada. As variações anatômicas, tais como o arco de Buhler, contribuem como canais anastomóticos e podem preservar o suprimento sanguíneo visceral. Neste relato de caso, descrevemos o manejo geral de um paciente do sexo masculino, de 54 anos, que apresentou uma dissecção aórtica do tipo B. Inicialmente, o manejo conservador foi escolhido, conforme indicado para dissecção do tipo B não complicada, mas a dissecção sofreu deterioração. Apesar de uma oclusão grave da artéria celíaca ter sido detectada na angiotomografia computadorizada, a variação anatômica do arco de Buhler estava presente, contribuindo para o suprimento sanguíneo visceral adequado. Após levar em consideração esse achado, o paciente foi tratado de forma efetiva com reparação endovascular da aorta torácica.

Unexpected renal hemorrhage after endovascular repair of complicated type B aortic dissection: two cases report.

BACKGROUND: Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is the therapeutic choice for type B aortic dissection. One of the most unfavored complications of this procedure is hemorrhage, which has a low incidence but high mortality. Renal hemorrhage (RH) after endovascular aortic repair has been rarely reported. We presented two cases of unexpected RH after TEVAR for complicated type B aortic dissection, and the potential causes, diagnosis and therapeutic management were discussed. CASE PRESENTATION: A 67-year-old female developed hypotension and progressively decrease of hemoglobin within 5 h after TEVAR for acute complicated type B dissection. Bedside ultrasonography and abdominal computed tomography angiography revealed a massive right perinephric hematoma. The right renal angiography detected multiple tortuous vascular branches with diffuse perinephric bleeding. The main trunk of right renal artery was embolized. The patient recovered uneventfully and presented with normal renal function 6 months later. Another patient was a 69-year-old male who was admitted for endovascular repair of a chronic complicated type B aortic dissection. The patient presented with hemodynamic instability early after TEVAR. Bedside ultrasonography showed a giant left retroperitoneal hematoma. The abdominal angiography revealed two active bleeding sits located in the distal branches of left renal artery. A super-selective embolization of the two arteries was performed, however the patient developed abdominal compartment syndrome and died of multiple organ failure. CONCLUSIONS: Unexpected RH after endovascular repair of aortic dissection might be associated with iatrogenic and idiopathic factors. Close surveillance and clinician's awareness of this rare complication is crucial for accurate and prompt diagnosis. Renal angiography and subsequent selective embolization of bleeding vessels are effective interventions for treating this fatal condition.

Case Report: Delayed Type A Aortic Dissection Following Complete Debranching of the Aortic Arch and Stent Graft Placement.

Treatment options for aortic arch disease in high-risk patients includes supra-aortic debranching and thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). Acute ascending aortic dissection is a concerning complication of this approach and has been reported to occur in a retrograde fashion. We report a case of a 60-year-old gentleman who had undergone thoracic endovascular aortic repair with debranching and presented 31 months later with acute isolated ascending aortic dissection. The patient underwent successful total replacement of the ascending aorta with a 30-mm gelwave Valsalva(™) graft using cardiopulmonary bypass.

Fiebre y disección retrógrada tipo A como complicación de la disección aórtica tipo B / Fever and retrograde type A aortic dissection as complication of type B aortic dissection / Febre e dissecção aórtica retrógrada tipo A como complicação da dissecção aórtica tipo B

La incidencia del síndrome aórtico agudo (disección aórtica, hematoma intramural, úlcera aterosclerótica penetrante y ruptura de la pared vascular) es de 2-3,5 casos por 100.000 habitantes cada año; pero la disección aórtica tipo A retrógrada es poco frecuente y sólo se han reportado casos aislados, en ocasiones como consecuencia de una intervención quirúrgica. Se presenta el caso clínico de un paciente de 62 años de edad, que acudió al cuerpo de guardia por dolor precordial que alivió con analgésicos y tanto la radiografía de tórax como el electrocardiograma eran normales. Al tercer día comenzó con fiebre que duró 4 semanas y desapareció espontáneamente, y fue dado de alta con todos los estudios normales y pancultivos negativos. Dos semanas después ingresa nuevamente por disnea de esfuerzo, que fue progresando. Al ingreso se constata signos clínicos de pericarditis, incluyendo roce pericardio, realizándose ecocardiograma y angio-TAC, donde se evidenció el diagnóstico de disección aórtica tipo B complicada con disección tipo A retrógrada y hemopericardio.

The incidence of acute aortic syndrome (aortic dissection, intramural hematoma, and penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer rupture of the vessel wall) is 2-3.5 cases per 100,000 people each year; but the retrograde type A aortic dissection is rare and only isolated cases have been reported, sometimes as a result of surgery. We report a case of a 62-year-old, who came to the emergency for chest pain relieved with analgesics and both chest radiography and electrocardiography were normal. On the third day began with fever that lasted for four weeks and disappeared spontaneously, was discharged with all studies normal and negatives cultives. Two weeks later admitted again by dyspnea on exertion, this was progressing. On admission to hospital clinical signs of pericarditis it is found, including pericardium rubbing, performing echocardiography and CT angiography, where the diagnosis of type B aortic dissection complicated with retrograde type A aortic dissection and hemopericardium was demonstrated.

A incidência de síndrome aórtica aguda (dissecção aórtica, hematoma intramural e penetrante ruptura úlcera aterosclerótica da parede do vaso) é 2-3,5 casos por 100.000 pessoas a cada ano; mas a dissecção aórtica tipo A retrógrada é rara e apenas casos isolados foram relatadas, algumas vezes como resultado da cirurgia. Nós relatamos o caso de um paciente de 62 anos de idade, que veio para a emergência por dor torácica aliviado com analgésicos e tanto a radiografia de tórax e eletrocardiograma eram normais. Ao terceiro dia o paciente começou com febre a qual durou quatro semanas e desapareceu espontaneamente, recebendo alta com todos os estudos normais e pancultivos negativos. Duas semanas mais tarde, ele foi internado no hospital novamente para a dispnéia, que estava progredindo. Na admissão do hospital sinais clínicos de pericardite foram encontrado, incluindo fricção pericárdica, realizando ecocardiografia e angiografia por TC, que revelou o diagnóstico de dissecção aórtica tipo B complicada com dissecção aórtica tipo A retrógrada e hemopericárdio.

Complicated type B aortic dissection causing ischemia in the celiac and inferior mesenteric artery distribution despite patent superior mesenteric artery bypass.

Mortality rates associated with acute type B aortic dissection (ABAD) complicated by malperfusion remains significant. Optimal management of patients with ABAD is still debatable. We present a case report of a 50-year-old man who was admitted due to ABAD. He was treated medically with his pain resolved and he was discharged on oral antihypertensive medications. One month after initial diagnosis, he was readmitted with abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea. On imaging, an extension of the aortic dissection into the visceral arteries with occlusion of the celiac and superior mesenteric arteries (SMA) was noted. He underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) and bypass grafting to the SMA. Despite the intervention, the patient developed large bowel, liver, and gastric ischemia and underwent bowel resection. He died from multi-organ failure. In selected cases of uncomplicated ABAD, TEVAR should be considered and when TEVAR fails and visceral malperfusion develops, an aggressive revascularization of multiple visceral arteries should be attempted.