Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 66
Filter
1.
Farm Hosp ; 2024 May 27.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38806362

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The main objective was to analyze unjustified discrepancies during the medication reconciliation process in patients admitted to the Hematology Service of our hospital and the pharmaceutical interventions. As a secondary objective, to detect possible points of the procedure to be perfected with a view to protocolizing the medication reconciliation process in hematological patients that adapts to the conditions of our center. METHODS: Cross-sectional observational pilot study carried out in a reference hospital in hematology for a population of 800,000 inhabitants. Adult inpatients admitted to the Hematology Service between August and October 2022 whose medication had been reconciled were included. The main variables were: number and type of unjustified discrepancy, proposed pharmaceutical intervention, and acceptance rate. RESULTS: 36 conciliation processes were analyzed, 34 admissions and 2 intrahospital transfer. 58.3% of the patients presented at least one unjustified discrepancy. 38 unjustified discrepancies were detected, with an acceptance of pharmaceutical interventions of 97.4%. The most common types of discrepancy were medication omission (56.8%) and drug interaction (24.3%). The most frequent pharmaceutical interventions were reintroducing medication (48.6%) and treatment discontinuation (16.2%). Polypharmacy and chemotherapy multiplied by 4 the probability of presenting drug interactions. CONCLUSIONS: The most common unjustified discrepancies in the medication reconciliation process in hospitalized hematology patients are: Medication omission and drug interactions. The reintroduction of medication and suspension of the prescription are the most frequent accepted pharmaceutical interventions. Polypharmacy is related to an increase in unjustified discrepancies. The factors that promote the appearance of interactions are admissions to receive chemotherapy treatment and polypharmacy. The main point of improvement detected is the need to create a circuit that allows conciliation to be carried out on discharge. Medication reconciliation contribute to improving patient safety by reducing medication errors.

2.
J Healthc Qual Res ; 39(3): 163-167, 2024.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38584085

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Electronic prescription is the prescription system that allows healthcare professionals to send medication prescriptions directly to community pharmacies and the outpatient unit of Hospital Pharmacy Services for dispensing. However, there is difficulty in obtaining a reliable pharmacotherapeutic history in chronic patients through electronic prescription upon hospital admission as a critical point for adequate treatment adaptation. Therefore, the pharmacist as a member of the multidisciplinary team must ensure, through medication conciliation, an adequate transition of care through the correct management of the treatment that the chronic patient requires during their hospitalization. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the quality of electronic prescription records for routine chronic treatment by analyzing the concordance of the electronic prescription. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Observational, cross-sectional and retrospective study at the General University Hospital of Elche. Hospitalized patients in charge of the Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology, Urology and Neurosurgery Services in which the responsible doctor requested medication reconciliation by the Pharmacy Service between January 2022 - December 2022 were included. RESULTS: 378 patients, 209 (55.3%) women and 169 (44.7%) men, with a mean age±standard deviation of 71.0±11.6 years and 69.0±11.8 years, respectively. The total percentage of patients with discrepancies in the electronic prescription with respect to the usual chronic treatment was 60.6%, reflecting that only 39.4% of the patients had non-discordant electronic prescriptions. CONCLUSIONS: More than half of hospitalized surgical patients present discrepancies in the medications prescribed in the home electronic prescription, which justifies the importance of treatment reconciliation upon admission carried out by hospital pharmacists.


Subject(s)
Electronic Prescribing , Medication Reconciliation , Humans , Female , Male , Cross-Sectional Studies , Retrospective Studies , Aged , Middle Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Hospitalization , Pharmacy Service, Hospital
3.
Rev. esp. sanid. penit ; 26(1): 18-24, Ene-Abr. 2024. tab, graf
Article in English, Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-231143

ABSTRACT

Introducción: La movilidad de la población penitenciaria precisa que la información transmitida en los traslados entre centros garantice una óptima continuidad asistencial. Objetivo: Valorar la calidad de la transmisión de información sanitaria cuando los internos son trasladados en conducción entre centros penitenciarios de todo el territorio español. Material y método: Estudio observacional, descriptivo y transversal, consistente en la revisión de historias clínicas de los internos que transitaron por el Centro Penitenciario (CP) Madrid III en un periodo de tres meses. Todas las variables medidas fueron cualitativas, expresadas en frecuencias absolutas y relativas. Resultados: Durante ese tiempo, 1.168 internos transitaron por el CP Madrid III. Solo 21 procedían de centros penitenciarios de Cataluña, País Vasco o Navarra, cuya historia clínica es diferente a la del resto del Estado, y solo el 57,14% aportaban algún tipo de información sanitaria. Del resto de internos, el 70,79% aportaba algún tipo de información: el 63,90% del total tenía medicación prescrita y el 5% metadona. De aquellos que tenían medicación, el 89,10% la tenían prescrita en la prescripción electrónica, siendo correcta en el 98% de los casos. Respecto a la metadona, solo el 75,44% lo tenía prescrito electrónicamente, siendo correcta en todos los casos. La fecha de la última dosis administrada solo se indicó en el 72,40% de los tratamientos. Discusión: Solo el 34,70% de las historias presentaban una calidad óptima en cuanto a la información transmitida, siendo en el 2,50% de los casos la información recibida deficiente. El uso de herramientas informáticas facilita la transmisión de la información, reduce la carga de trabajo y mejora la seguridad del paciente.(AU)


Introduction: The mobility of the prison population creates a need for information transmitted in transfers between centers that can guarantee optimal care continuity. Objective: To assess the quality of transmission of health information when inmates are transferred between prisons in Spain. Material and method: Observational, descriptive and cross-sectional study, consisting of a review of medical records of inmates who passed through Madrid III Prison in a three-month period. All measured variables were qualitative, and were expressed in absolute and relative frequencies. Results: 1,168 inmates passed through Madrid III Prison in this period. Only 21 came from prisons in Catalonia, the Basque Country or Navarre, where their medical records are different from those in the rest of Spain, and only 57.14% provided some type of health information. Of the remaining inmates, 70.79% provided some type of information: 63.90% of the total had prescriptions for medication and 5% were prescribed with methadone. Of those taking medication, 89.10% were prescribed it in electronic prescriptions, which were correct in 98% of the cases. For methadone, only 75.44% had electronic prescriptions,which were correct in all cases. The date of the last dose administered was only indicated in 72.40% of the treatments. Discussion: Only 34.70% of the records presented optimal quality in terms of the information transmitted, and in 2.50% of the cases the information received was deficient. The use of computerized tools facilitates the transmission of information, reduces the workload and improves patient safety.(AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Consumer Health Information , Patient Care , Quality of Health Care , Patient Safety , Continuity of Patient Care , Patient Transfer , Prisons , Spain , Epidemiology, Descriptive , Cross-Sectional Studies , Rights of Prisoners , Medication Reconciliation , Prisoners/education
4.
Farm. comunitarios (Internet) ; 16(1): 18-27, Ene. 2024. tab
Article in English, Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-229278

ABSTRACT

El presente estudio aborda la situación profesional y laboral de los farmacéuticos comunitarios de Gipuzkoa. Se han realizado las siguientes acciones: 1) Grupo de discusión entre farmacéuticos titulares y adjuntos, 2) Encuesta sobre satisfacción y conciliación de los farmacéuticos colegiados ejercientes en farmacia comunitaria y 3) Análisis de los motivos de las bajas de colegiación de los últimos 3 años. Se han realizado análisis cuantitativos y cualitativos. Se observa una problemática multifactorial que incluye dificultad de contratación de farmacéutico adjuntos, conciliación, falta de satisfacción y desarrollo profesional, horarios y otras condiciones laborales. La satisfacción profesional y la conciliación de los farmacéuticos titulares es mayor que la de los farmacéuticos adjuntos (p<0,001), aunque la conciliación no sea favorable para ninguno de los dos colectivos profesionales. La conciliación se percibe como mejor en farmacias de horario continuado, frente a farmacias con horario partido. El 70,5 % (n=67) de los farmacéuticos que se han dado de baja del colegio en los últimos 3 años, lo han hecho para cambiar de ámbito profesional, siendo educación e industria las opciones más frecuentes. La situación profesional y laboral del farmacéutico ejerciente en farmacia comunitaria requiere de una reflexión profunda para poder plantear estrategias globales que mejoren la satisfacción profesional y conciliación. (AU)


The purpose of this study is to explore the professional and working conditions of community pharmacists in the province of Gipuzkoa. The methodology employed involved: 1) A discussion with owner pharmacists and associate pharmacists, 2) A survey on satisfaction and work-life balance of pharmacists working in community pharmacies, and 3) Analysis of the reasons for cancelling membership of the association of pharmacists in the last 3 years. Data were analysed qualitatively and quantitatively. There was evidence of a range of issues including difficulty in recruiting associate pharmacists, unfavourable work-life balance, low job satisfaction and lack of professional development, poor business hours and other working conditions. Owner pharmacists reported a higher level of job satisfaction and work-life balance than associate pharmacists (p<0.001). However, both groups had a poor work-life balance. The issue of work-life balance is seen as being better in pharmacies with continuous business hours, as opposed to those with split (morning/afternoon) hours. Seventy percent (n=67) of pharmacists who cancelled their membership of the association over the last three years moved to another professional domain, particularly education and industry. In-depth deliberation is required into the professional and working situation of pharmacists working in community pharmacies, with a view to positing global strategies to improve job satisfaction and work-life balance. (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Job Satisfaction , Pharmacists , Pharmacies , Spain
5.
Farm. hosp ; 47(6): 261-267, Noviembre - Diciembre 2023. tab, graf
Article in English, Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-227538

ABSTRACT

Objetivo determinar la prevalencia de errores de conciliación (EC) al ingreso hospitalario en la población pediátrica onco-hematológica para comprobar si ésta presenta una susceptibilidad similar a la de los adultos para ser afectados por estos EC y describir las características de los pacientes en los que se producen.Métodoestudio prospectivo y multicéntrico de 12 meses de duración, de conciliación de medicación al ingreso en la población pediátrica onco-hematológica para evaluar la incidencia de EC y describir las características de los pacientes en los que se producen.Resultadosse concilió la medicación de 157 pacientes. En 96 pacientes se detectó al menos una discrepancia de la medicación. De las discrepancias detectadas, el 52,1% fueron justificadas por la nueva situación clínica del paciente o por el médico responsable mientras que el 48,9% se consideraron EC. El tipo de EC más frecuente fue la «omisión de algún medicamento», seguido por «una dosis, frecuencia o vía de administración diferente». Se efectuaron un total de 77 intervenciones farmacéuticas, de las que se aceptaron el 94,2%. En el grupo de pacientes con un número igual o mayor a 4 fármacos en tratamiento domiciliario se observó un incremento de 2,1 veces la probabilidad de experimentar un EC.Conclusionespara evitar o reducir los errores en uno de los puntos críticos de seguridad como son las transiciones asistenciales, existen medidas, como la conciliación de la medicación. En el caso de los pacientes pediátricos crónicos complejos, como los pacientes onco-hematológicos, el número de fármacos como parte del tratamiento domiciliario es la variable que se ha asociado a la presencia de EC al ingreso hospitalario, siendo la omisión de algún medicamento la causa principal de estos errores. (AU)


Objective To determine the prevalence of reconciliation errors (RE) on admission to hospital in the paediatric onco-haematological population in order to check whether they are similarly susceptible to these RE as adults and to describe the characteristics of the patients who suffer them.MethodsA 12-month prospective, multicentre study of medication reconciliation on admission in the paediatric onco-haematological population to assess the incidence of RE and describe the characteristics of the patients in whom they occur.ResultsMedication reconciliation was performed in 157 patients. At least 1 medication discrepancy was detected in 96 patients. Of the discrepancies detected, 52.1% were justified by the patient's new clinical situation or by the physician, while 48.9% were determined to be RE. The most frequent type of RE was the "omission of a medication", followed by "a different dose, frequency or route of administration". A total of 77 pharmaceutical interventions were carried out, 94.2% of which were accepted. In the group of patients with a number equal to or greater than 4 drugs in home treatment, there was a 2.1-fold increase in the probability of suffering a RE.ConclusionsIn order to avoid or reduce errors in one of the critical safety points such as transitions of care, there are measures such as medication reconciliation. In the case of complex chronic paediatric patients, such as onco-haematological patients, the number of drugs as part of home treatment is the variable that has been associated with the presence of medication RE on admission to hospital, with the omission of some medication being the main cause of these errors. (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Medication Reconciliation , Medication Errors , Pediatrics/instrumentation , Medical Oncology , Hematology , Prevalence
6.
An. pediatr. (2003. Ed. impr.) ; 99(6): 376-384, Dic. 2023. ilus, tab, graf
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-228656

ABSTRACT

Introducción: La conciliación de la medicación (CM) es una de las principales estrategias para disminuir los errores de medicación en las transiciones asistenciales. En España existen publicadas diferentes guías con recomendaciones para la implantación y el desarrollo de la CM orientadas a la población adulta, sin estar los pacientes pediátricos incluidos. En el año 2018 se llevó a cabo un estudio que permitió la posterior publicación de un documento con criterios de selección de pacientes pediátricos en los que priorizar la CM. Objetivos: Describir las características de los pacientes pediátricos con mayor probabilidad de sufrir errores de conciliación (EC), para confirmar si los resultados de un estudio previo son extrapolables. Metodología: Estudio prospectivo y multicéntrico con pacientes pediátricos ingresados. Se analizaron los EC detectados durante la realización de la CM al ingreso. La mejor historia farmacoterapéutica posible del paciente fue obtenida utilizando diferentes fuentes de información y confirmándose con una entrevista con el paciente/cuidador. Resultados: Se detectaron 1.043 discrepancias, determinándose como EC 544, afectando a 317 pacientes (43%). La omisión de algún medicamento fue el error más común (51%). La mayoría de los EC se asociaron con los medicamentos de los grupos A (31%), N (23%) y R (11%) de la clasificación ATC. La polimedicación y la enfermedad de base onco-hematológica fueron los factores de riesgo asociados a la presencia de EC con significación estadística. Conclusiones: Los hallazgos de este estudio permiten priorizar la CM en un grupo concreto de pacientes pediátricos, favoreciendo la eficiencia del proceso. Los pacientes onco-hematológicos y la polimedicación se confirman como los principales factores de riesgo para la aparición de EC en la población pediátrica.(AU)


Introduction: Medication reconciliation (MR) is one of the main strategies used to reduce medication errors in care transitions. In Spain, several guidelines have been published with recommendations for the implementation and development of MR processes aimed at the adult population, and not applicable to paediatric patients. In 2018, a study was carried out that allowed the subsequent publication of a document establishing criteria for the selection of paediatric patients in whom CM should be prioritised. Objectives: To describe the characteristics of the paediatric patients most likely to be subject to reconciliation errors (REs) to confirm whether the results of a previous study could be extrapolated. Methodology: Prospective, multicentre study in paediatric inpatients. We analysed the REs detected in the MR at the time of admission. We obtained the best possible medication history of the patient using different sources of information, subsequently confirmed through an interview with the patient/caregiver. Results: 1043 discrepancies were detected, of which 544 were categorised as REs, affecting 317 patients (43%). Omission of a drug was the most common error (51%). Most REs involved drugs in groups A (31%), N (23%) and R (11%) of the ATC classification. Polypharmacy and oncological/haematological disease were the risk factors that exhibited a statistically significant association with the occurrence of REs. Conclusions: The findings of this study allow the prioritisation of MR in a specific group of paediatric patients, contributing to improve the efficiency of the process. Oncological/haematological disease and polypharmacy were confirmed as the main risk factors for the occurrence of REs in the paediatric population.(AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Child , Medication Reconciliation , Medication Errors , Patient Safety , Quality of Health Care , Spain , Pediatrics , Prospective Studies
7.
An Pediatr (Engl Ed) ; 99(6): 376-384, 2023 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38036314

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Medication reconciliation (MC) is one of the main strategies to reduce medication errors in care transitions. In Spain, several guidelines have been published with recommendations for the implementation and development of MC aimed at the adult population, although paediatric patients are not included. In 2018, a study was carried out that led to the subsequent publication of a document with criteria for selecting paediatric patients in whom CM should be prioritised. OBJECTIVES: To describe the characteristics of paediatric patients most likely to suffer from errors of reconciliation (EC), to confirm whether the results of a previous study can be extrapolated. METHODOLOGY: Prospective, multicentre study of paediatric inpatients. We analysed the CE detected during the performance of the CM on admission. The best possible pharmacotherapeutic history of the patient was obtained using different sources of information and confirmed by an interview with the patient/caregiver. RESULTS: 1043 discrepancies were detected, 544 were identified as CD, affecting 317 patients (43%). Omission of a drug was the most common error (51%). The majority of CD were associated with drugs in groups A (31%), N (23%) and R (11%) of the ATC classification. Polymedication and onco-haematological based disease were the risk factors associated with the presence of CD with statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study allow prioritisation of CM in a specific group of paediatric patients, favouring the efficiency of the process. Onco-haematological patients and polymedication are confirmed as the main risk factors for the appearance of CD in the paediatric population.


Subject(s)
Medication Reconciliation , Patient Admission , Child , Humans , Medication Errors/prevention & control , Medication Reconciliation/methods , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors
8.
Farm Hosp ; 47(6): T261-T267, 2023.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37716875

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of reconciliation errors on admission to hospital in the pediatric onco-hematological population in order to check whether they are similarly susceptible to these reconciliation errors as adults and to describe the characteristics of the patients who suffer them. METHODS: A 12-month prospective, multicentre study of medication reconciliation on admission in the pediatric onco-hematological population to assess the incidence of reconciliation errors and to describe the characteristics of the patients. RESULTS: Medication reconciliation was performed in 157 patients. At least a medication discrepancy was detected in 96 patients. Of the discrepancies detected, 52.1% were related to patient's new clinical situation or by the physician, while 48.9% were determined to be reconciliation errors. The most frequent type of reconciliation error was the "omission of a medication", followed by "a different dose, frequency or route of administration". A total of 77 pharmaceutical interventions were carried out, 94.2% of which were accepted. In the group of patients with a number equal to or greater than 4 drugs in home treatment, there was a 2.1-fold increase in the probability of suffering a reconciliation error. CONCLUSIONS: In order to avoid or reduce errors in one of the critical safety points such as transitions of care, there are measures such as medication reconciliation. In the case of complex chronic pediatric patients, such as onco-hematological patients, the number of drugs as part of home treatment is the variable that has been associated with the presence of medication reconciliation errors on admission to hospital, and the omission of some medication was the main cause of these errors.


Subject(s)
Medication Errors , Medication Reconciliation , Adult , Humans , Child , Prospective Studies , Medication Errors/prevention & control , Patient Admission , Hospitals
9.
Rev. Fac. Med. UNAM ; 66(4): 37-55, jul.-ago. 2023. tab, graf
Article in Spanish | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1514822

ABSTRACT

Resumen La soledad individualista humana impele a vivir en pareja y a alcanzar complementariedad hombre/mujer, afecto y reci procidad. El periodismo científico de este artículo parafrasea el contenido de su bibliografía al revisar la elección de pareja, su satisfacción y complicaciones e instrucción preventiva de circunstancias que ocasionan ruptura. La falla -desde la elección-, desconoce los mecanismos entre razón e instinto sexual. El problema del amor no es ser amado sino desarrollar tal capacidad, pues lo extingue la inadaptación y monotonía. Se describe el acto elector/elegido y sus razones simultáneas: conscientes (homogeneidad/heterogeneidad del encuentro; emulación del modelo animal; tipo, dinámica vincular y redes sociales; aspectos sociodemográficos; ubicación geográfica y accesibilidad; compartición sexual y expectativas inmediatas/ futuras), e inconscientes (problemática electora, interacción diádica y antecedentes parentales; mecanismos de defensa, intercambio de disociaciones; idealización; reciprocidad negativa, lucha de poder, identificación proyectiva, búsqueda de aprecio por el otro; narcisismo, falso sí mismo, mecanis mos de dilación/evasión de responsabilidad, inseguridad, intrusión y colusión). Una pareja saludable, entiende/atiende la creación y mantenimiento del "nosotros", elimina la lucha de poder y produce conciliación permanente. El acuerdo y comprensión tolerante son indispensables para una relación emocional satisfactoria, estable y duradera.


Abstract Human individualistic loneliness impels us to live as a couple and achieve complementarity between man and woman, af fection, and reciprocity. The science journalism of this article reviews the choice of partner, their satisfaction and complications, and preventive instruction of circumstances that cause rupture. The failure from the election ignores the mechanisms between reason and sexual instinct. The problem of love is not to be loved but to develop such a capacity, for it is extinguished by maladjustment and monotony. The voting/elected act and its simultaneous reasons are described: Conscious (homogeneity/heterogeneity of the encounter; emulation of the animal model; type, dynamic link and social networks; Sociodemographic aspects; sexual sharing and immediate/future expectations). Unconscious (electoral problems, dyadic interaction, and parental background; defense mechanisms, exchange of dissociations; idealization; negative reciprocity, power struggle, projective identification, search for appreciation for the other; narcissism, false self, mecha nisms of procrastination/evasion of responsibility, insecurity, intrusion, and collusion). A healthy couple, understands/at tends to the creation and maintenance of the "we", eliminates the power struggle and produces permanent conciliation. Tolerant agreement and understanding are indispensable for a satisfying, stable, and lasting emotional relationship.

10.
Farm Hosp ; 47(6): 261-267, 2023.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37422402

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of reconciliation errors (RE) on admission to hospital in the paediatric onco-haematological population in order to check whether they are similarly susceptible to these RE as adults and to describe the characteristics of the patients who suffer them. METHODS: A 12-month prospective, multicentre study of medication reconciliation on admission in the paediatric onco-haematological population to assess the incidence of RE and describe the characteristics of the patients in whom they occur. RESULTS: Medication reconciliation was performed in 157 patients. At least 1 medication discrepancy was detected in 96 patients. Of the discrepancies detected, 52.1% were justified by the patient's new clinical situation or by the physician, while 48.9% were determined to be RE. The most frequent type of RE was the "omission of a medication", followed by "a different dose, frequency or route of administration". A total of 77 pharmaceutical interventions were carried out, 94.2% of which were accepted. In the group of patients with a number equal to or greater than 4 drugs in home treatment, there was a 2.1-fold increase in the probability of suffering a RE. CONCLUSIONS: In order to avoid or reduce errors in one of the critical safety points such as transitions of care, there are measures such as medication reconciliation. In the case of complex chronic paediatric patients, such as onco-haematological patients, the number of drugs as part of home treatment is the variable that has been associated with the presence of medication RE on admission to hospital, with the omission of some medication being the main cause of these errors.


Subject(s)
Medication Errors , Medication Reconciliation , Child , Humans , Hospitals , Medication Errors/prevention & control , Patient Admission , Prospective Studies
11.
Farm. hosp ; 47(3): t106-t112, Mayo - Junio 2023. tab, graf
Article in English, Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-221599

ABSTRACT

Objetivo: evaluar la contribución del farmacéutico mediante el análisis de la prescripción potencialmente inapropiada y la conciliación del tratamiento domiciliario en la unidad de pacientes crónicos complejos de un hospital terciario. Métodos: estudio observacional, prospectivo y multidisciplinar de los pacientes de la unidad de pacientes crónicos complejos de un hospital durante febrero de 2019 - junio de 2020. El equipo multidisciplinar del crónico complejo elaboró un checklist con una selección de fármacos no recomendados basado en los criterios STOPP/START, Beers y PRISCUS y fármacos susceptibles de desprescripción según los criterios LESS-CHRON. El farmacéutico aplicaba el checklist diariamente en los pacientes que ingresaban en la unidad, además de realizar la conciliación del tratamiento domiciliario revisando el tratamiento prescrito con el detallado en la receta electrónica domiciliaria. Por eso, se recogieron las siguientes variables: edad, sexo y número de fármacos al ingreso como variables independientes, y variables dependientes: número de fármacos al alta, tipo de prescripción potencialmente inapropiada, motivos de conciliación, fármacos implicados y grado de aceptación de la recomendación por parte del médico prescriptor para evaluar la contribución farmacéutica. El análisis estadístico se realizó con IBM® SPSS® Statistics22. Resultados : se revisaron 621 pacientes con una mediana de edad de 84 años (56,4% mujeres), y se intervino en 218 (35,1%). La mediana del número de fármacos fue de 11 (2-26) al ingreso y de 10 (0-25) al alta. Se realizaron 373 intervenciones: 235 por conciliación de la medicación (78,3% aceptadas), 71 por medicamentos no recomendados (57,7% aceptadas), 42 por desprescripción (61,9% aceptadas) y 25 por otros motivos. ... (AU)


Objective: To assess the pharmacist’s contributions by analysing potentially inappropriate prescription and home treatment reconciliation in the complex chronic patient unit of a tertiary hospital.MethodObservational, prospective, multidisciplinary study of patients in the complex chronic patient unit of a hospital during February 2019 - June 2020. Multidisciplinary team of the complex chronic developed a checklist with a selection of non-recommended drugs based on STOPP/START, Beers and PRISCUS criteria, and drugs susceptible to deprescription according to LESS-CHRON criteria. The pharmacist applied the checklist daily in patients admitted to the unit, in addition to reconciling home treatment by reviewing the prescribed treatment with that detailed in the electronic home prescription. Therefore, the following variables were collected: age, sex and number of drugs on admission as independent variables, and dependent variables: number of drugs at discharge, type of potentially inappropriate prescription, reasons for reconciliation, drugs involved and degree of acceptance of the recommendation by the prescribing physician to assess the pharmaceutical contribution. The statistical analysis was performed with IBM® SPSS® Statistics22.Results: We reviewed 621 patients with a median age of 84 years (56.4% women), and intervention was performed in 218 (35.1%). The median number of drugs was 11 (2-26) at admission and 10 (0-25) at discharge 373 interventions were performed: 235 for medication reconciliation (78.3% accepted), 71 for non-recommended drugs (57.7% accepted), 42 for deprescription (61.9% accepted) and 25 for other reasons. Statistically significant differences were observed between the number of drugs at discharge and at admission in both intervention patients (n = 218) and complex chronic patients (n = 114) (p < 0.001 in both cases). ...(AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Aged, 80 and over , Pharmaceutical Services/supply & distribution , Hospital Units , Chronic Disease/drug therapy , Chronic Disease/therapy , Drug Prescriptions , Inappropriate Prescribing , Prospective Studies , Interdisciplinary Research , Pharmacists/trends
12.
Farm. hosp ; 47(3): t121-t126, Mayo - Junio 2023. tab, graf
Article in English, Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-221601

ABSTRACT

Objetivos : el objetivo de este estudio fue determinar si la transición del alta de la unidad de cuidados intensivos a la planta de hospitalización conlleva un alto riesgo de errores de conciliación. Se definió como objetivo principal del estudio describir y cuantificar las discrepancias y los errores de conciliación. Los objetivos secundarios incluyeron clasificar los errores de conciliación por tipo, grupo terapéutico de los medicamentos implicados y la gravedad potencial. Métodos: se llevó a cabo un estudio observacional retrospectivo de los pacientes dados de alta de la unidad de cuidados intensivos a la planta de hospitalización. Antes de que un paciente fuese dado de alta desde la unidad de cuidados intensivos, sus últimas prescripciones fueron comparadas con el listado de medicación propuesto en la planta de hospitalización. Las discrepancias entre ambos listados fueron clasificadas como discrepancias justificadas o errores de conciliación. Los errores de conciliación fueron clasificados por tipo de error, por gravedad potencial y por grupo terapéutico. Resultados: fueron conciliados 452 pacientes. Se encontró al menos una discrepancia en un 34,29% (155/452), y presentaba al menos un error de conciliación 18,14% (82/452). Los errores de conciliación más frecuentes fueron diferente dosis o vía de administración (31,79% [48/151]) y errores de omisión (31,79% [48/151]). Un 19,20% (29/151) involucraba a medicamentos de alto riesgo. Conclusiones: el alta desde la unidad de cuidados intensivos a la planta de hospitalización convencional es una transición asistencial que presenta alto riesgo de errores de conciliación. Los errores de conciliación ocurren con frecuencia, en ocasiones involucran a medicamentos de alto riesgo, su potencial gravedad puede requerir una monitorización adicional o producir daño temporal, y en algunos casos, más de un error de conciliación puede tener lugar. ... (AU)


Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine whether the transition of care from the intensive care unit to the ward would pose a high risk for reconciliation errors. The primary outcome of this study was to describe and quantify the discrepancies and reconciliation errors. Secondary outcomes included classification of the reconciliation errors by type of medication error, therapeutic group of the drugs involved and grade of potential severity. Methods: We conducted a retrospective observational study of reconciliated adult patients discharged from the Intensive Care Unit to the ward. Before a patient was discharged from the intensive care unit, their last intensive care unit’s prescriptions were compared with their proposed medication list in the ward. The discrepancies between these were classified as justified discrepancies or reconciliation errors. Reconciliation errors were classified by type of error, potential severity, and therapeutic group. Results: We found that 452 patients were reconciliated. At least one discrepancy was detected in 34.29% (155/452), and 18.14% (82/452) had at least one reconciliation errors. The most found error types were a different dose or administration route (31.79% [48/151]) and omission errors (31.79% [48/151]). High alert medication was involved in 19.20% of reconciliation errors (29/151). Conclusions: Our study shows that intensive care unit to non-intensive care unit transitions are high-risk processes for reconciliation error. They frequently occur and occasionally involve high alert medication, and their severity could require additional monitoring or cause temporary harm. Medication reconciliation can reduce reconciliation errors. (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Medication Reconciliation , Intensive Care Units , Inpatient Care Units , Medication Errors , Retrospective Studies , Pharmacists
13.
Farm Hosp ; 47(3): T121-T126, 2023.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37246122

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine whether the transition of care from the intensive care unit to the ward would pose a high risk for reconciliation errors. The primary outcome of this study was to describe and quantify the discrepancies and reconciliation errors. Secondary outcomes included classification of the reconciliation errors by type of medication error, therapeutic group of the drugs involved and grade of potential severity. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational study of reconciliated adult patients discharged from the Intensive Care Unit to the ward. Before a patient was discharged from the intensive care unit, their last intensive care unit's prescriptions were compared with their proposed medication list in the ward. The discrepancies between these were classified as justified discrepancies or reconciliation errors. Reconciliation errors were classified by type of error, potential severity, and therapeutic group. RESULTS: We found that 452 patients were reconciliated. At least one discrepancy was detected in 34.29% (155/452), and 18.14% (82/452) had at least one reconciliation errors. The most found error types were a different dose or administration route (31.79% [48/151]) and omission errors (31.79% [48/151]). High alert medication was involved in 19.20% of reconciliation errors (29/151). CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that intensive care unit to non-intensive care unit transitions are high-risk processes for reconciliation error. They frequently occur and occasionally involve high alert medication, and their severity could require additional monitoring or cause temporary harm. Medication reconciliation can reduce reconciliation errors.


Subject(s)
Medication Reconciliation , Patient Discharge , Adult , Humans , Medication Errors/prevention & control , Intensive Care Units , Hospitals
14.
Farm Hosp ; 47(3): T106-T112, 2023.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37032197

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess the pharmacist's contributions by analysing potentially inappropriate prescription and home treatment reconciliation in the complex chronic patient unit of a tertiary hospital. METHOD: Observational, prospective, multidisciplinary study of patients in the complex chronic patient unit of a hospital during February 2019 - June 2020. Multidisciplinary team of the complex chronic developed a checklist with a selection of non-recommended drugs based on STOPP/START, Beers and PRISCUS criteria, and drugs susceptible to deprescription according to LESS-CHRON criteria. The pharmacist applied the checklist daily in patients admitted to the unit, in addition to reconciling home treatment by reviewing the prescribed treatment with that detailed in the electronic home prescription. Therefore, the following variables were collected: age, sex and number of drugs on admission as independent variables, and dependent variables: number of drugs at discharge, type of potentially inappropriate prescription, reasons for reconciliation, drugs involved and degree of acceptance of the recommendation by the prescribing physician to assess the pharmaceutical contribution. The statistical analysis was performed with IBM® SPSS® Statistics22. RESULTS: We reviewed 621 patients with a median age of 84 years (56.4% women), and intervention was performed in 218 (35.1%). The median number of drugs was 11 (2-26) at admission and 10 (0-25) at discharge 373 interventions were performed: 235 for medication reconciliation (78.3% accepted), 71 for non-recommended drugs (57.7% accepted), 42 for deprescription (61.9% accepted) and 25 for other reasons. Statistically significant differences were observed between the number of drugs at discharge and at admission in both intervention patients (n = 218) and complex chronic patients (n = 114) (p < 0.001 in both cases). Moreover, statistically significant differences were observed in the number of drugs at admission between patients included in the complex chronic programme and those not included (p = 0.001), and in the number of drugs at discharge (p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: The integration of the pharmacist in the multidisciplinary team of the complex chronic patient unit improves patient safety and quality of care. The selected criteria were useful for detecting inappropriate drugs in this population and favoured deprescription.


Subject(s)
Hospitalization , Pharmaceutical Services , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Inappropriate Prescribing/prevention & control , Potentially Inappropriate Medication List , Prospective Studies , Tertiary Care Centers
15.
Farm Hosp ; 47(3): 121-126, 2023.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37059685

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine whether the transition of care from the intensive care unit to the ward would pose a high risk for reconciliation errors. The primary outcome of this study was to describe and quantify the discrepancies and reconciliation errors. Secondary outcomes included classification of the reconciliation errors by type of medication error, therapeutic group of the drugs involved and grade of potential severity. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational study of reconciliated adult patients discharged from the Intensive Care Unit to the ward. Before a patient was discharged from the intensive care unit, their last intensive care unit's prescriptions were compared with their proposed medication list in the ward. The discrepancies between these were classified as justified discrepancies or reconciliation errors. Reconciliation errors were classified by type of error, potential severity, and therapeutic group. RESULTS: We found that 452 patients were reconciliated. At least one discrepancy was detected in 34.29% (155/452), and 18.14% (82/452) had at least one reconciliation errors. The most found error types were a different dose or administration route (31.79% (48/151)) and omission errors (31.79% (48/151)). High alert medication was involved in 19.20% of reconciliation errors (29/151). CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that intensive care unit to non-intensive care unit transitions are high-risk processes for reconciliation error. They frequently occur and occasionally involve high alert medication, and their severity could require additional monitoring or cause temporary harm. Medication reconciliation can reduce reconciliation errors.


Subject(s)
Medication Reconciliation , Patient Discharge , Adult , Humans , Medication Errors/prevention & control , Intensive Care Units , Hospitals
16.
Farm Hosp ; 47(3): 106-112, 2023.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36842862

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess the pharmacist's contributions by analyzing potentially inappropriate prescription and home treatment reconciliation in the complex chronic patient unit of a tertiary hospital. METHOD: Observational, prospective, multidisciplinary study of patients in the complex chronic patient unit of a hospital during February 2019-June 2020. Multidisciplinary team of the complex chronic developed a checklist with a selection of non-recommended drugs based on STOPP/START, Beers and Priscus criteria, and drugs susceptible to deprescription according to LESS-CHRON criteria. The pharmacist applied the checklist daily in patients admitted to the unit, in addition to reconciling home treatment by reviewing the prescribed treatment with that detailed in the electronic home prescription. Therefore, the following variables were collected: age, sex and number of drugs on admission as independent variables, and dependent variables: number of drugs at discharge, type of potentially inappropriate prescription, reasons for reconciliation, drugs involved and degree of acceptance of the recommendation by the prescribing physician to assess the pharmaceutical contribution. The statistical analysis was performed with IBM® SPSS® Statistics22. RESULTS: We reviewed 621 patients with a median age of 84 years (56.4% women), and intervention was performed in 218 (35.1%). The median number of drugs was 11 (2-26) at admission and 10 (0-25) at discharge. 373 interventions were performed: 235 for medication reconciliation (78.3% accepted), 71 for non-recommended drugs (57.7% accepted), 42 for deprescription (61.9% accepted) and 25 for other reasons. Statistically significant differences were observed between the number of drugs at discharge and at admission in both intervention patients (n = 218) and complex chronic patients (n = 114) (p < 0.001 in both cases). Moreover, statistically significant differences were observed in the number of drugs at admission between patients included in the complex chronic programme and those not included (p = 0.001), and in the number of drugs at discharge (p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: The integration of the pharmacist in the multidisciplinary team of the complex chronic patient unit improves patient safety and quality of care. The selected criteria were useful for detecting inappropriate drugs in this population and favored deprescription.


Subject(s)
Hospitalization , Pharmaceutical Services , Humans , Female , Aged, 80 and over , Male , Prospective Studies , Inappropriate Prescribing/prevention & control , Potentially Inappropriate Medication List , Tertiary Care Centers
17.
Arq. ciências saúde UNIPAR ; 27(9): 5004-5016, 2023.
Article in Portuguese | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1509978

ABSTRACT

Esse trabalho teve como objetivo identificar as discrepâncias medicamentosas, por meio do serviço de conciliação de medicamentosa, em pacientes admitidos na clínica cirúrgica de uma unidade especializada no atendimento de doença relacionadas ao sistema neuromuscular na cidade de Manaus, Amazonas. Trata-se de um estudo descritivo e prospectivo, realizado no período de setembro a dezembro de 2020 em pacientes submetidos a conciliação medicamentosa. Na primeira etapa realizou-se a anamnese farmacêutica em formulário semiestruturado e foi elaborada a melhor história possível de medicamentos (MHPM). Os medicamentos prescritos na admissão foram comparados com a MHPM e as discrepâncias foram identificadas e classificadas quanto a intencionalidade e tipo. Ao total 54 pacientes foram incluídos no estudo, sendo que para 32 foi realizada a conciliação medicamentosa por usarem medicamentos de uso contínuo. Foram identificadas 20 discrepâncias intencionais, 3 discrepâncias intencionais não documentadas e 12 discrepâncias não intencionais. Omissão de medicamentos foi o tipo de discrepância mais comum (86%). Diante do exposto, concluímos que a conciliação medicamentosa mostrou-se um importante recurso para identificação de discrepâncias na transição de cuidado de pacientes com doenças neurológicas, principalmente no que se refere à omissão de medicamentos. As intervenções farmacêuticas a partir das discrepâncias encontradas, conseguiram mitigar erros de medicação e possíveis eventos adversos, aumentando a segurança do paciente.


This work aimed to identify medication discrepancies, through the medi- cation reconciliation service, in patients admitted to the surgical clinic of a unit special- ized in treating diseases related to the neuromuscular system in the city of Manaus, Ama- zonas. This is a descriptive and prospective study, carried out from September to Decem- ber 2020 in patients undergoing medication reconciliation. In the first stage, the pharma- ceutical anamnesis was carried out in a semi-structured form and the best possible medi- cation history (MHPM) was prepared. Medications prescribed on admission were com- pared with the MHPM and discrepancies were identified and classified according to in- tentionality and type. 54 patients were included in the study, and for 32 medication rec- onciliation was performed because they used continuous medication. A total of 20 inten- tional discrepancies, 3 intentional undocumented discrepancies and 12 unintentional dis- crepancies were identified. Medication omission was the most common type of discrep- ancy (86%). We conclude that medication reconciliation proved to be an important re- source for identifying discrepancies in the transition of care for patients with neurological diseases, especially with regard to medication omission. Pharmaceutical interventions, based on the discrepancies found, managed to mitigate medication errors and possible adverse events, increasing patient safety.


Este estudio tuvo como objetivo identificar las discrepancias de medicación a través del servicio de reconciliación de medicamentos, en pacientes internados en la clínica quirúrgica de una unidad especializada en el tratamiento de enfermedades relacio- nadas con el sistema neuromuscular en la ciudad de Manaus, Amazonas. Este es un estu- dio descriptivo y prospectivo, realizado de septiembre a diciembre de 2020 en pacientes en conciliación de medicación. En la primera etapa se realizó la anamnesis farmacéutica de forma semiestructurada y se elaboró el mejor historial de medicación posible (MHPM). Los medicamentos prescritos al ingreso se compararon con el MHPM y se identificaron las discrepancias y se clasificaron según la intencionalidad y el tipo. Un total de 54 pacientes fueron incluidos en el estudio, y a 32 se les realizó conciliación de medi- cación por utilizar medicación continua. Se identificaron un total de 20 discrepancias in- tencionales, 3 discrepancias intencionales no documentadas y 12 discrepancias no inten- cionales. La omisión de medicamentos fue el tipo más común de discrepancia (86%). Concluimos que la conciliación de medicamentos demostró ser un recurso importante para identificar discrepancias en la transición de la atención a pacientes con enfermedades neurológicas, especialmente en lo que respecta a la omisión de medicamentos. Las inter- venciones farmacéuticas, en base a las discrepancias encontradas, lograron mitigar errores de medicación y posibles eventos adversos, aumentando la seguridad del paciente PALABRAS CLAVE: Conciliación de Medicamentos; Seguridad del Paciente; Servicio de Farmacia Hospitalaria; Neurología.

18.
Rev. bras. enferm ; 76(2): e20210755, 2023. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS-Express | LILACS, BDENF - Nursing | ID: biblio-1423179

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT Objectives: to develop and validate the content of two instruments for promoting medication reconciliation for the transition of care of hospitalized children. Methods: methodological study, conducted in five stages: scope review for conceptual structure; elaboration of the initial version; content validation with five specialists using the Delphi technique; reassessment; and construction of the final version of the instruments. A content validity index of at least 0.80 was adopted. Results: three rounds of evaluation were carried out to reach the validity index of the proposed contents, whereas a new analysis of 50% of the 20 items of the instrument aimed at families, and 28.5% of the 21 items aimed at professionals was necessary. The instrument aimed at families reached an index of 0.93, and the instrument for professionals, 0.90. Conclusions: the proposed instruments were validated. It is now possible to proceed with practical implementation studies to identify their influence on safety during medication reconciliation at transition of care.


RESUMEN Objetivos: elaborar y validar contenido de dos instrumentos para la promoción de conciliación medicamentosa en la transición de atención de niños hospitalizados. Métodos: estudio metodológico realizado en cinco etapas: revisión de ámbito para estructura conceptual; elaboración de versión inicial; validación del contenido con cinco especialistas utilizando la Técnica Delphi; re-evaluación; y construcción de versión final de los instrumentos. Adoptado índice de validez de contenido, como mínimo, 0.80. Resultados: fueron realizadas tres rondas de evaluación para alcance de índice de validez en los contenidos propuestos, siendo necesario nuevo análisis de 50% de los 20 ítems del instrumento destinado a familias, y 28,5% de los 21 ítems destinados a profesionales. Instrumento dirigido a familias alcanzó índice de 0,93; y el instrumento, a profesionales, 0,90. Conclusiones: instrumentos propuestos fueron validados, siendo posible proseguir con estudio de implementación práctica para identificar influencia en la seguridad durante la conciliación medicamentosa en la transición de atención.


RESUMO Objetivos: elaborar e validar o conteúdo de dois instrumentos para a promoção da reconciliação medicamentosa na transição dos cuidados de crianças hospitalizadas. Métodos: estudo metodológico realizado em cinco etapas: revisão de escopo para estrutura conceitual; elaboração da versão inicial; validação do conteúdo com cinco especialistas utilizando a Técnica Delphi; reavaliação; e construção da versão final dos instrumentos. Adotou-se o índice de validade de conteúdo de, no mínimo, 0.80. Resultados: foram realizadas três rodadas de avaliação para alcance de índice de validade nos conteúdos propostos, sendo necessária nova análise de 50% dos 20 itens do instrumento destinado às famílias, e 28,5% dos 21 itens destinados aos profissionais. O instrumento direcionado às famílias atingiu índice de 0,93; e o instrumento, aos profissionais, 0,90. Conclusões: os instrumentos propostos foram validados, sendo possível prosseguir com estudo de implementação prática para identificar influência na segurança durante a reconciliação medicamentosa na transição dos cuidados.

19.
An. R. Acad. Nac. Farm. (Internet) ; 88(número extraordinario): 182-188, diciembre 2022.
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-225777

ABSTRACT

Los errores de medicación constituyen tema prioritario dentro de la estrategia de seguridad del paciente, por lo que es fundamental analizar discrepancias que ocurren entre los medicamentos que se administra el paciente antes de ingresar a la unidad de salud y la prescripción que se le indica durante su hospitalización y al alta. El objetivo del trabajo fue identificar los errores de medicación en pacientes con enfermedades crónicas no transmisibles (ECNT), en un hospital de Tungurahua, Ecuador. Se evaluaron, en un período de tres meses, las anamnesis presentes en historias clínicas de pacientes con ECNT, al ingreso al servicio de emergencia y durante la estancia, traslados intra hospitalarios y el alta; a fin de identificar y clasificar errores encontrados como discrepancias o errores de conciliación. Se encontraron que, de 154 historias clínicas analizadas, en 57 (34,1 %) no existía anamnesis, siendo ésta última realizada de manera correcta en 58 (42,5 %) y de manera incorrecta en 39(23,4 %). Se determinaron 327 discrepancias, 218 durante la estancia hospitalaria y 109 en el momento del alta de los pacientes, siendo la hipertensión arterial en ambos casos la ECNT, con mayor número de discrepancias. Fueron encontradas discrepancias justificadas y discrepancias que requirieron aclaración durante la estancia y alta hospitalaria, identificándose en las primeras una mayor prevalencia de gravedad tipo A, mientras que, las discrepancias de gravedad tipo D correspondieron a las de mayor presencia al momento del alta. (AU)


Medication errors are a priority issue within the strategy of patient safety, so it is essential to analyze discrepancies that occur between the medications administered by the patient before entering the health unit and the prescription that is indicated during their hospitalization and discharge. The objective of the work was to identify medication errors in patients with noncommunicable chronic diseases (NCD), in a hospital in Tungurahua, Ecuador. The anamnesis present in clinical histories of patients with NCD, on admission to the emergency service and during the stay, intrahospital transfers and discharge were evaluated over a period of three months; in order to identify and classify errors found as discrepancies or reconciliation errors. We found that out of 154 clinical histories analyzed, in 57 (34,1 %) there was no anamnesis, the latter being performed correctly in 58 (42,5 %) and incorrectly in 39 (23,4 %). 327 discrepancies were determined, 218 during the hospital stay and 109 at the time of discharge of the patients, with arterial hypertension in both cases being the ECNT, with the greatest number of discrepancies. We found justified discrepancies and discrepancies that required clarification during the hospital stay and discharge, identifying in the former a higher prevalence of type A severity, while the discrepancies of type D severity corresponded to those of greater presence at discharge. (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Noncommunicable Diseases , Medication Errors , Medication Reconciliation , Patient Discharge
20.
Farm. comunitarios (Internet) ; 14(3): 57-60, julio 2022. tab
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-209783

ABSTRACT

Paciente de 76 años con dificultades cognitivas, polimedicado y que vive solo al que se le realizan los sistemas personalizados de dosificación o reacondicionamiento (SPD) en la farmacia desde hace 3 meses. Entre las patologías destacan insuficiencia cardiaca y fibrilación auricular no controlada, por lo que esta medicado con apixaban 5 mg como prevención secundaria. Acude a la farmacia con un informe de alta hospitalaria en el que se da la orden de retirar el anticoagulante, ya que se encuentra con triple terapia. Al ver el informe y compararlo con la medicación habitual se observó que se trataba de una discrepancia no intencionada y que requería aclaración inmediata debido a los medicamentos que envolvía. Tras ponerse en contacto con la médica responsable se dedujo que el error de conciliación había sido producido por un registro inadecuado y no actualizado de la información del paciente, así que volvió a reestablecer la medicación habitual y actualizó la historia farmacológica del paciente. Usando la herramienta CLEO esta intervención obtuvo un impacto clínico mayor por evitar una estancia hospitalaria, un impacto económico negativo, por aumentar el coste del tratamiento, y un impacto organizativo positivo, ya que, supuso un aumento en la calidad del servicio. (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Aged , Patients , Heart Failure , Atrial Fibrillation , Pharmacy , Pharmaceutical Services , Therapeutics , Medication Reconciliation
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...