Post-operative intensity-modulated vs 3D conformal radiotherapy after conservative surgery for laryngeal tumours of the supraglottic region: a dosimetric analysis on 20 patients.

Objective: To perform a dosimetric comparison between intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and 3D conformal radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced (stage III and IV) tumours of the supraglottic region treated with conservative surgery and post-operative radiotherapy. Methods: An in-silico plan using a 3D conformal shrinking field technique was retrospectively produced for 20 patients and compared with actually delivered IMRT plans. Eighteen structures (arytenoids, constrictor muscles, base of tongue, floor of mouth, pharyngeal axis, oral cavity, submandibular glands and muscles of the swallowing functional units [SFU]) were considered. Results: IMRT allowed a reduction of maximum and mean doses to 9 and 14 structures, respectively (p < .05). Conclusions: IMRT achieved a reduction of unnecessary dose to the remnant larynx and the majority of surrounding SFUs. Further prospective analyses and correlations with functional clinical outcomes are required to confirm these dosimetric findings.

Feasibility of determining external beam radiotherapy dose using LuSy dosimeter.

INTRODUCTION: Radiation dose measurement is an essential part of radiotherapy to verify the correct delivery of doses to patients and ensure patient safety. Recent advancements in radiotherapy technology have highlighted the need for fast and precise dosimeters. Technologies like FLASH radiotherapy and magnetic-resonance linear accelerators (MR-LINAC) demand dosimeters that can meet their unique requirements. One promising solution is the plastic scintillator-based dosimeter with high spatial resolution and real-time dose output. This study explores the feasibility of using the LuSy dosimeter, an in-house developed plastic scintillator dosimeter for dose verification across various radiotherapy techniques, including conformal radiotherapy (CRT), intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT), and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A new dosimetry system, comprising a new plastic scintillator as the sensing material, was developed and characterized for radiotherapy beams. Treatment plans were created for conformal radiotherapy, IMRT, VMAT, and SRS and delivered to a phantom. LuSy dosimeter was used to measure the delivered dose for each plan on the surface of the phantom and inside the target volumes. Then, LuSy measurements were compared against an ionization chamber, MOSFET dosimeter, radiochromic films, and dose calculated using the treatment planning system (TPS). RESULTS: For CRT, surface dose measurement by LuSy dosimeter showed a deviation of -5.5% and -5.4% for breast and abdomen treatment from the TPS, respectively. When measuring inside the target volume for IMRT, VMAT, and SRS, the LuSy dosimeter produced a mean deviation of -3.0% from the TPS. Surface dose measurement resulted in higher TPS discrepancies where the deviations for IMRT, VMAT, and SRS were -2.0%, -19.5%, and 16.1%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The LuSy dosimeter was feasible for measuring radiotherapy doses for various treatment techniques. Treatment delivery verification enables early error detection, allowing for safe treatment delivery for radiotherapy patients.

Reirradiation of metastases of the central nervous system: part 2-metastatic epidural spinal cord compression.

An increasing number of patients irradiated for metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC) experience an in-field recurrence and require a second course of radiotherapy. Reirradiation can be performed with conventional radiotherapy or highly-conformal techniques such as intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). When using conventional radiotherapy, a cumulative biologically effective dose (BED) ≤120 calculated with an α/ß value of 2 Gy (Gy2) was not associated with radiation myelopathy in a retrospective study of 124 patients and is considered safe. In that study, conventional reirradiation led to improvements of motor deficits in 36% of patients and stopped further symptomatic progression in another 50% (overall response 86%). In four other studies, overall response rates were 82-89%. In addition to the cumulative BED or equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions (EQD2), the interval between both radiotherapy courses <6 months and a BED per course ≥102 Gy2 (corresponding to an EQD2 ≥51 Gy2) were identified as risk factors for radiation myelopathy. Without these risk factors, a BED >120 Gy2 may be possible. Scoring tools have been developed that can assist physicians in estimating the risk of radiation myelopathy and selecting the appropriate dose-fractionation regimen of re-treatment. Reirradiation of MESCC may also be performed with highly-conformal radiotherapy. With IMRT or VMAT, rates of pain relief and improvement of neurologic symptoms of 60-93.5% and 42-73%, respectively, were achieved. One-year local control rates ranged between 55% and 88%. Rates of myelopathy or radiculopathy and vertebral compression fractures were 0% and 0-9.3%, respectively. With SBRT, rates of pain relief were 65-86%. Two studies reported improvements in neurologic symptoms of 0% and 82%, respectively. One-year local control rates were 74-83%. Rates of myelopathy or radiculopathy and vertebral compression fractures were 0-4.5% and 4.5-13.8%, respectively. For SBRT, a cumulative maximum EQD2 to thecal sac ≤70 Gy2, a maximum EQD2 of SBRT ≤25 Gy2, a ratio ≤0.5 of thecal sac maximum EQD2 of SBRT to maximum cumulative EQD2, and an interval between both courses ≥5 months were associated with a lower risk of myelopathy. Additional prospective trials are required to better define the options of reirradiation of MESCC.

Radiotherapy for Metastatic Epidural Spinal Cord Compression with Increased Doses: Final Results of the RAMSES-01 Trial.

Patients with metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC) and favorable survival prognoses may benefit from radiation doses exceeding 10 × 3.0 Gy. In a multi-center phase 2 trial, patients receiving 15 × 2.633 Gy (41.6 Gy10) or 18 × 2.333 Gy (43.2 Gy10) were evaluated for local progression-free survival (LPFS), motor/sensory functions, ambulatory status, pain, distress, toxicity, and overall survival (OS). They were compared (propensity score-adjusted Cox regression) to a historical control group (n = 266) receiving 10 × 3.0 Gy (32.5 Gy10). In the phase 2 cohort, 50 (of 62 planned) patients were evaluated for LPFS. Twelve-month rates of LPFS and OS were 96.8% and 69.9%, respectively. Motor and sensory functions improved in 56% and 57.1% of patients, and 94.0% were ambulatory following radiotherapy. Pain and distress decreased in 84.4% and 78.0% of patients. Ten and two patients experienced grade 2 and 3 toxicities, respectively. Phase 2 patients showed significantly better LPFS than the control group (p = 0.039) and a trend for improved motor function (p = 0.057). Ambulatory and OS rates were not significantly different. Radiotherapy with 15 × 2.633 Gy or 18 × 2.333 Gy was well tolerated and appeared superior to 10 × 3.0 Gy.

Treatment robustness of total body irradiation with volumetric modulated arc therapy.

This study evaluated the robustness of multi-isocenter Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Total Body Irradiation dose distribution in the overlapping region between the head-first and feet-first computed tomography scans, considering the longitudinal isocenter shifts recorded during treatment delivery. For 15 out of 22 patients, the dose distribution in the overlapping region fulfilled all three the robustness criteria. The overlapping region dose distribution of the remaining 7 cases fulfilled two robustness criteria. The dose distribution was found to be robust against daily recorded longitudinal isocenter shifts, as a consequence of the patient position verification procedure, of up to 16 mm.

Safety of Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy on the Sheep with Pulmonary Cystic Echinococcosis: A Preliminary Study.

PURPOSE: Radiotherapy showed the potential to effectively kill the cysts of pulmonary cystic echinococcosis (CE). However, little is known about its safety. This study was designed to investigate the safety of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) on the normal lung tissue adjacent to the cyst and blood of sheep naturally infected with pulmonary CE. METHODS: Twenty pulmonary CE sheep were randomly divided into control group (n = 5) and radiation groups with a dose of 30 Gray (Gy) (n = 5), 45 Gy (n = 5), and 60 Gy (n = 5), respectively. Animals in control group received no radiation. Heat shock protein 70 (Hsp70), tumor growth factor-ß (TGF-ß), matrix metalloproteinase-2 (MMP-2) and MMP-9 in the lung tissues adjacent to the cysts, which were considered to be closely related to the pathogenesis of CE, were evaluated after 3D-CRT. A routine blood test was conducted. RESULTS: The results showed that there were multiple cysts of various sizes with protoscoleces in the lung tissues of sheep, and necrotic cysts were found after 3D-CRT. 3D-CRT significantly increased the mRNA level of Hsp70, enhanced the protein level of TGF-ß and slightly increased the expression of MMP-2 and MMP-9 in lung tissues adjacent to the cysts. 3D-CRT did not significantly alter the amount of WBC, HB and PLT in sheep blood. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggested that 3D-CRT may suppress the inflammation and induce less damage of the normal lung tissues and blood. We preliminarily showed that 3D-CRT under a safe dose may be used to treat pulmonary CE.

Daily fraction dose-adjusted radiotherapy policy to avoid prolonging the overall treatment time for early glottic squamous cell carcinoma: a single-institutional retrospective study.

The objective of this study was to determine the outcomes of radical radiotherapy for early glottic squamous cell carcinoma (EGSCC) with the policy of increasing the fraction size during radiotherapy when the overall treatment time (OTT) was expected to be prolonged. Patients diagnosed with clinical T1-2N0M0 EGSCC, who were treated with radical radiotherapy between 2008 and 2019 at Hokkaido University Hospital, were included. Patients received 66 Gy in 33 fractions for T1 disease and 70 Gy in 35 fractions for T2 disease as our standard regimen (usual group [UG]). If the OTT was expected to extend for >1 week, the dose fraction size was increased from 2.0 to 2.5 Gy from the beginning or during radiotherapy (adjusted group [AG]). At this time, we performed a statistical analysis between UG and AG. In total, 116 patients were identified, and the treatment schedules of 29 patients were adjusted. The median follow-up was 60.9 months. In the T1 group, the cumulative 5-year local failure rate was 12.0% in the AG and 15.4% in the UG, and in the T2 group, the rate was 40.7% in the AG and 25.3% in the UG. There were no significant differences between the AG and UG. Similarly, no significant differences were observed for overall survival and progression-free survival rates. Our single-institutional retrospective analysis of EGSCC patients suggested that a method of adjusting the radiotherapy schedule to increase fraction size from the beginning or during the course may be effective in maintaining treatment outcomes.

A comparison of the incidence of ≥ grade 2 radiation pneumonitis between intensity-modulated radiotherapy and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy in patients with unresectable non-small cell lung cancer treated with durvalumab after concurrent chemoradiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) has been increasingly used as a new radiation modality for unresectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The risk factors for radiation pneumonitis (RP) during consolidation durvalumab following concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) using IMRT have not been thoroughly investigated. METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed medical record data from consecutive patients diagnosed with NSCLC who underwent CCRT and consolidation durvalumab at our institution between April 2018 and September 2022. Since we adopted IMRT for the treatment of NSCLC in April 2020, these patients were categorized into two groups: those treated with IMRT after April 2020 and those treated with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) before April 2020. RESULTS: A total of 31 patients underwent IMRT (the IMRT group), while 25 patients underwent 3D-CRT (the 3D-CRT group). In both groups, the total dose was 60 Gy in 30 fractions. The cumulative incidence of ≥ grade 2 RP at 12 months was significantly lower in the IMRT group than in the 3D-CRT group (27.0% vs. 64.0%, hazard ratio [HR]: 0.338, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.144-0.793, p = 0.013). In the multivariable analysis, V20 (≥ 25.6%, HR: 2.706, 95% CI: 1.168-6.269, p = 0.020) and radiotherapy technique (IMRT, HR: 0.414, 95% CI: 0.172-0.994, p = 0.048) were identified as significant risk factors for ≥ grade 2 RP. CONCLUSIONS: IMRT is associated with a lower rate of ≥ grade 2 RP in patients with NSCLC who received CCRT followed by durvalumab.

A Retrospective Comparison of Toxicity, Response and Survival of Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy Versus Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiation Therapy in the Treatment of Rectal Carcinoma.

INTRODUCTION: The main target of neoadjuvant treatment in rectal cancer is to downstage and downsize large tumours to increase the chance of complete surgical resection, and therefore decrease the chances of local recurrence. With or without the addition of chemotherapy, until recently, three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) used to be the radiotherapy treatment modality of choice. However, intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) is being increasingly adopted by many radiotherapy centres as a more modern, conformal technique due to its ability to minimize radiation dose to nearby organs. The aim of our analysis was to assess the difference in toxicity, response to treatment, and survival between the patients treated with these two different treatment modalities in our institution. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of data and compared two groups of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who were treated with either 3D-CRT or IMRT. The main outcomes were radiation toxicity and response to treatment. Overall survival was a secondary outcome. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-six patients were included in the study: 71 patients treated with 3D-CRT and 65 patients treated with IMRT. With regard to toxicity, there was no significant difference between the groups for bladder and skin toxicity, but there was a significant reduction in acute grade 2 bowel toxicity in patients treated with a long course of IMRT [3D-CRT 77% (48/62) vs IMRT 64% (30/47) p=0.042]. There was no statistically significant difference in the treatment response rates of these two radiotherapy treatment modalities, as well as in overall survival between the groups (p=0.604).  Conclusion: Our study showed that IMRT can significantly reduce acute bowel side effects for patients undergoing neoadjuvant radiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancers. Further studies are needed to confirm the clinical advantage of IMRT in rectal carcinoma.

Curative Intent Radiation for Anal Cancer in Pelvic Kidney Transplant: A Case Report With an Eight-Year Follow-Up.

The incidence of malignancies seen after solid organ transplant is increasing, and oncologists are seeing more patients with transplanted organs. In this case report, we present how pelvic radiotherapy can be safely administered in a patient with a transplanted kidney by conducting a comprehensive chart review and analyzing the dosimetry in the radiotherapy planning software Eclipse. A 52-year-old female patient received a kidney transplant in 2002 and was diagnosed 11 years later with a cT3 N0 M0 squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal. She was offered radical radiation therapy with 45 Gy in 25 fractions using a volumetric modulated arc therapy plan to the pelvic lymph nodes and tumor followed by a 9-Gy boost to the anal tumor alone using a three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy plan with concurrent 5-fluorouracil/mitomycin chemotherapy for a total dose of 54 Gy. The right external iliac and inguinal lymph nodes coverage was compromised to decrease the solitary pelvic kidney dose in addition to creating a 1-cm planning risk volume around the kidney and using half-beam blocks. Her pelvic kidney only received a mean dose of 6.68 Gy. Eight years later, the patient continues to be cancer-free, as evident with a recent sigmoidoscopy in 2021 and a physical examination in 2022. Her creatinine started to rise one year post-treatment, but age of the transplanted kidney is likely the cause of kidney failure.

Heart and Coronary Artery Dose Sparing in Left-sided Breast Cancer: 3D-Conformal Radiotherapy vs. Helical Tomotherapy.

BACKGROUND/AIM: To compare heart, left ventricle (LV) and coronary artery dose-sparing with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) vs. helical tomotherapy (HT) in left-sided breast cancer (BC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: 3D-CRT and HT treatments were planned for 20 patients (pts). Computed tomography (CT) scans without and with intravenous contrast (ic) were performed and co-registered. Left breast and organs at risk (OARs) were contoured. Dose-volume histograms (DVHs) for 3D-CRT and HT treatment plans were evaluated in terms of planning target volume for evaluation (PTVeval) coverage and dose to the OARs. RESULTS: HT provided the best target coverage and significantly reduced D2% and mean dose to the left anterior descending artery (LADA) and to the LADA-planning organ at risk volume (PRV), D2%, V5 and mean dose to the LV and D2% and V25 to the heart. As expected, due to the rotational delivery, the dose to all other coronary arteries and their PRV, contralateral breast and lungs was higher with HT. CONCLUSION: In left-sided BC, HT provided the best target coverage and significantly reduced LV and LADA doses. Moreover D2% and V25 to the heart were significantly reduced. Further studies are needed to correlate dosimetric findings with in-depth cardiac monitoring.

Deep-learning Method for the Prediction of Three-Dimensional Dose Distribution for Left Breast Cancer Conformal Radiation Therapy.

AIMS: An increase in the demand of a new generation of radiotherapy planning systems based on learning approaches has been reported. At this stage, the new approach is able to improve the planning speed while saving a reasonable level of plan quality, compared with available planning systems. We believe that new achievements, such as deep-learning models, will be able to review the issue from a different point of view. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The data of 120 breast cancer patients were used to train and test the three-dimensional U-Res-Net model. The network input was computed tomography images and patients' contouring, while the patients' dose distribution was addressed as the output of the model proposed. The predicted dose distributions, created by the model for 10 test patients, were then compared with corresponding dose distributions calculated by a reliable treatment planning system. In particular, the dice similarity coefficients for different isodose volumes, dose difference and mean absolute errors (MAE) for all voxels inside the body, Dmean, D98%, D50%, D2%, V95% for planning target volume and organs at risk were calculated and were statistically analysed with the paired-samples t-test. RESULTS: The average dose difference for all patients and voxels in body was 0.60 ± 2.81%. The MAE varied from 3.85 ± 6.65% to 8.06 ± 10.00%. The average MAE for test cases was 5.71 ± 1.19%. The average dice similarity coefficients for isodose volumes was 0.91 ± 0.03. The three-dimensional gamma passing rates with 3 mm/3% criteria varied from 78.99% to 97.58% for planning target volume and organs at risk, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The investigation showed that a deep-learning model can be applied to predict the three-dimensional dose distribution with optimal accuracy and precision for patients with left breast cancer. As further study, the model can be extended to predict dose distribution in other cancers.

Dosimetric comparison of three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy, intensity-modulated radiation therapy, and volumetric-modulated arc therapy for free-breathing whole-breast irradiation: A planning study.

Background: Currently, recommended heart dose constraints are difficult to meet in whole-breast irradiation (WBI) for left-sided breast cancer patients, who cannot be treated with the deep inspiration breath hold. We performed a radiotherapy planning study to establish if the use of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) or volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) allows for better sparing of the heart and its subvolumes than the three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT), and how these attempts affect the dose delivered to the other organs. Methods: A total of 17 left-sided and 10 right-sided consecutive patients treated with free-breathing WBI were retrospectively included. The 3D-CRT, IMRT, and VMAT plans were generated. Several dose-volume parameters and plan quality indices were compared, separately for the left- and right-sided plans. Results: All the techniques fulfilled the planning objectives. In the left-sided plans, there was no heart or left ventricle dose reduction with IMRT, nor with VMAT; the maximum dose in the left anterior descending coronary artery was reduced with VMAT (P = 0.005); V5 for the contralateral breast, contralateral lung, and total-body increased markedly in VMAT, and for the ipsilateral lung (V5IL) also in IMRT, compared with 3D-CRT (P < 0.001). In the right-sided plans, the V5 values, except for V5IL, did not differ between the three techniques. Conclusions: IMRT and VMAT had a limited heart-sparing benefit in the left-sided free-breathing WBI, at the cost of increased low-dose volumes, measured by V5. The low-dose volumes are not increased by IMRT or VMAT in the right-sided WBI, where heart sparing is not a problem, but the attempts to reduce cardiac doses in the left-sided WBI increase them.

Post-operative flank irradiation using conformal versus highly conformal radiotherapy techniques for paediatric renal tumours: Results from the French registry PediaRT.

PURPOSE: Three-dimensional conformal RT (3D-RT) techniques are gold standard for post-operative flank radiotherapy (RT) in paediatric renal tumours. Recently, highly conformal RT (HC-RT) techniques have been implemented without comparative clinical data. The main objective of this multicentre study was to compare locoregional control (LRC) in children treated either with HC-RT or 3D-RT techniques. METHODS: Patients treated with post-operative flank RT for renal tumour registered in the national cohort PediaRT between March 2013 and September 2019 were included. Treatment and follow-up data, including toxicities and outcomes, were retrieved from the database. LRC was calculated, and dose reconstruction was performed in case of an event. RESULTS: Seventy-nine patients were included. Forty patients were treated with HC-RT and 39 with 3D-RT. Median follow-up was 4.5 years. Three patients had locoregional failure (LRF; 4%). HC-RT was not associated with a higher risk of LRF. Three-year LRC were 97.4% and 94.7% in the HC-RT and 3D-RT groups, respectively. The proportion of planning target volumes receiving 95% or more of the prescribed dose did not significantly differ between both groups (HC-RT 88%; 3D-RT 69%; p = .05). HC-RT was better achieving dose constraints, and a significant mean dose reduction was observed in the peritoneal cavity and pancreas associated with lower incidence of acute gastrointestinal toxicity. CONCLUSION: LRF after post-operative flank RT for renal tumours was rare and did not increase using HC-RT versus 3D-RT techniques. Dose to the pancreas and the peritoneal cavity, as well as acute toxicity, were reduced with HC-RT compared to 3D-RT.

3D-conformal very-high energy electron therapy as candidate modality for FLASH-RT: A treatment planning study for glioblastoma and lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Pre-clinical ultra-high dose rate (UHDR) electron irradiations on time scales of 100 ms have demonstrated a remarkable sparing of brain and lung tissues while retaining tumor efficacy when compared to conventional dose rate irradiations. While clinically-used gantries and intensity modulation techniques are too slow to match such time scales, novel very-high energy electron (VHEE, 50-250 MeV) radiotherapy (RT) devices using 3D-conformed broad VHEE beams are designed to deliver UHDR treatments that fulfill these timing requirements. PURPOSE: To assess the dosimetric plan quality obtained using VHEE-based 3D-conformal RT (3D-CRT) for treatments of glioblastoma and lung cancer patients and compare the resulting treatment plans to those delivered by standard-of-care intensity modulated photon RT (IMRT) techniques. METHODS: Seven glioblastoma patients and seven lung cancer patients were planned with VHEE-based 3D-CRT using 3 to 16 coplanar beams with equidistant angular spacing and energies of 100 and 200 MeV using a forward planning approach. Dose distributions, dose-volume histograms, coverage (V95% ) and homogeneity (HI98% ) for the planning target volume (PTV), as well as near-maximum doses (D2% ) and mean doses (Dmean ) for organs-at-risk (OAR) were evaluated and compared to clinical IMRT plans. RESULTS: Mean differences of V95% and HI98% of all VHEE plans were within 2% or better of the IMRT reference plans. Glioblastoma plan dose metrics obtained with VHEE configurations of 200 MeV and 3-16 beams were either not significantly different or were significantly improved compared to the clinical IMRT reference plans. All OAR plan dose metrics evaluated for VHEE plans created using 5 beams of 100 MeV were either not significantly different or within 3% on average, except for Dmean for the body, Dmean for the brain, D2% for the brain stem, and D2% for the chiasm, which were significantly increased by 1, 2, 6, and 8 Gy, respectively (however below clinical constraints). Similarly, the dose metrics for lung cancer patients were also either not significantly different or were significantly improved compared to the reference plans for VHEE configurations with 200 MeV and 5 to 16 beams with the exception of D2% and Dmean to the spinal canal (however below clinical constraints). For the lung cancer cases, the VHEE configurations using 100 MeV or only 3 beams resulted in significantly worse dose metrics for some OAR. Differences in dose metrics were, however, strongly patient-specific and similar for some patient cases. CONCLUSIONS: VHEE-based 3D-CRT may deliver conformal treatments to simple, mostly convex target shapes in the brain and the thorax with a limited number of critical adjacent OAR using a limited number of beams (as low as 3 to 7). Using such treatment techniques, a dosimetric plan quality comparable to that of standard-of-care IMRT can be achieved. Hence, from a treatment planning perspective, 3D-conformal UHDR VHEE treatments delivered on time scales of 100 ms represent a promising candidate technique for the clinical transfer of the FLASH effect.

Determination and comparison of dosimetric parameters of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy, field in field, and intensity-modulated radiotherapy techniques in radiotherapy of breast conserving patients.

Purpose: Three radiation therapy techniques for breast are common, namely three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT), Field-in-Field (FIF), and Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT). The purpose of this study was to determine and compare dosimetric parameters of three different treatment planning planning types; 3D-CRT, FIF, and IMRT in target and normal tissues after breast-conserving surgery. Methods: One hundred patients with left or right breast cancer cooperated in this study. They were divided into three categories (small, medium, and large size) based on breast volume. Three treatment planning techniques were carried out by planner for each patient in Prowess® 5.2 Treatment Planning System. The dosimetric parameters were obtained from dose-volume histograms using the CERR software (MATLAB Company, Washington, USA), which runs as an add-on in MATLAB software. Results: 3D-CRT technique with the highest value of Dmax creates more hot spots than the other techniques in the tumor region (P = 0.013). IMRT and FIF showed the best uniformity compared to 3D-CRT in all groups with respect to the values of the parameters D98 and D2. IMRT provided the best coverage in the tumor compared to other methods (P < 0.001). 3D-CRT technique yielded a high volume receiving ≥107% of the prescription dose (P < 0.001). Among the three methods, the FIF method results in a lower dose to the lung for treatment based on the V5 and V20 parameters (P < 0.001). Homogeneity index for IMRT was better than FIF, as well as, conformity index (CI) for IMRT and FIF was better than 3D-CRT. Conclusion: IMRT and FIF plans offered excellent target coverage and uniformity, whereas FIF had better protection of healthy tissues. Thus FIF method is an efficient method to improve the quality of treatment for breast cancer patients.

Target volume coverage in clinically designed radiotherapy plan of post-mastectomy adjuvant radiotherapy of breast cancer patients in comparison with radiation therapy oncology group-based contoured plan: A dosimetric study.

Objective: Conventional field radiotherapy based on anatomical landmarks has been the traditional treatment for breast cancer. Having proven efficacy, it is still the current standard of treatment. The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) has published guidelines for contouring target volumes in postmastectomy patients. The impact of this guideline in the current clinical practice is less known; hence, we have analyzed dose-volume histograms (DVHs) for these plans and compared them with the proposed treatment plans to treat RTOG-defined targets. Subjects and Methods: RTOG consensus definitions were used to contour the target volumes in 20 previously treated postmastectomy patients. The prescription was 42.4 Gy in 16 fractions. DVHs were generated from clinically designed plans that had actually been delivered to each patient. For comparing dose to target volumes, new plans were generated with the goal of covering 95% of volume to 90% of prescribed dose. Results: In RTOG contoured Group, coverage improved for the supraclavicular (V90 = 83 vs. 94.9%, P < 0.05) and chest wall (V90 = 89.8 vs. 95.2%, P < 0.05). Axillary nodal coverage improved for Level-1(V90 = 80.35 vs. 96.40%, P < 0.05), Level-II (V90 = 85.93 vs. 97.09%, P < 0.05) and Level III (V90 = 86.67 vs. 98.6%, P < 0.05). The dose to the ipsilateral lung is increased (V20 = 23.87 vs. 28.73%, P < 0.05). Low dose to heart is increased in left-sided cases (V5 = 14.52 vs. 16.72%, P < 0.05) while same in right-sided cases. Conclusions: The study shows that radiotherapy using the RTOG consensus guidelines improves coverage to target volumes with a nonsignificant increase in normal organ dose compared to that based on anatomical landmarks.

Long-term outcomes of modern multidisciplinary management of sinonasal cancers: The M. D. Anderson experience.

PURPOSE: To report long-term outcomes of modern radiotherapy for sinonasal cancers. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A retrospective analysis of patients with sinonasal tumors treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy or proton therapy. Multivariate analysis was used to determine predictive variables of progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Three hundred and eleven patients were included, with median follow-up of 75 months. The most common histologies were squamous cell (42%), adenoid cystic (15%), and sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma (15%). Induction chemotherapy was administered to 47% of patients; 68% had adjuvant radiotherapy. Ten-year local control, regional control, distant metastasis free survival, PFS, and overall survival rates were 73%, 88%, 47%, 32%, and 51%, respectively. Age, non-nasal cavity tumor site, T3-4 stage, neck dissection, and radiation dose were predictive of PFS, while age, non-nasal cavity tumor site, T3-4 stage, positive margins, neck dissection, and use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy were predictive of OS. There was a 13% rate of late grade ≥3 toxicities. CONCLUSION: This cohort of patients with sinonasal cancer treated with modern radiotherapy demonstrates favorable disease control rate and acceptable toxicity profile.

Angle of concavity in planning target volume can be adopted as selection criteria for intensity-modulated radiation therapy or three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy technique in brain tumors.

Introduction: With innovation of medical imaging, radiotherapy attempts to conform the high dose region to the planning target volume (PTV). The present work aimed to assess the angle of concavity in PTV can be adopted as selection criteria for intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) or three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) technique in Brain tumors. Materials and Methods: Thirty previously irradiated patients with brain tumors were replanned with both 3DCRT and IMRT technique. Angle of concavity (dip) in the PTV near the organs at risk was measured in the contoured structure set images of each patient. These cases were divided into three groups where angles were 0°, >120° and <120°. Dose of 60 Gy/30# was fixed. Results: In Group 1, the IMRT plan had better TV95% as compared to 3DCRT respectively with significant P value (P = 0.002). Mean of conformity index (CI) and Homogeneity Index (HI) were comparable. For Group 2 (angle >120°), the IMRT plan had better TV95% as compared to 3DCRT respectively with a significant P value (P = 0.021). HI and CI were not significant. For Group 3 (<120°), IMRT plan had better TV95% as compared to 3DCRT respectively with a significant P value (P = 0.001). HI and CI were better in IMRT arm with significant P value. Conclusion: The results from this study showed that the angle of concavity can be considered as an additional objective tool for selection criteria whether tumor can be treated with IMRT or 3DCRT. Tumors where angle of concavity was <120°, HI and CI provided more uniformity and conformity of dose distribution inside PTV with significant P values.

A Prospective Cohort Study Analyzing Radiation-Induced Xerostomia and Quality of Life of Head and Neck Cancer Patients Treated With Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy and 3D Conformal Radiotherapy Techniques at a Tertiary Cancer Center in Eastern India.

Introduction Cancer of the head and neck is one of the most common cancers in India. Radiotherapy (RT) plays a vital role in the management of head and neck cancer both as a curative and adjuvant modality. Xerostomia is the most common acute and late toxicity. Therefore, this study aimed to analyze radiation-induced xerostomia and the quality of life of patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and three-dimensional (3D) conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT). Objectives We aim to evaluate radiation-induced acute xerostomia both subjectively and objectively at three-month and one-year post-radiotherapy follow-up period in patients who received radiotherapy in conformal technique (IMRT) to the head and neck region and compare it with those who received the 3DCRT technique. We also aim to assess the recovery of salivary flow in the third month post-radiotherapy by measuring the parotid scintigraphy excretion fraction. Materials and methods Forty patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) were randomly assigned to the IMRT and 3DCRT arms. Xerostomia during radiation and at three-month and one-year post-radiotherapy follow-up was assessed subjectively using the xerostomia-related quality of life (XeQOL) questionnaire and objectively by measuring the salivary flow rate and parotid scintigraphy. Results The result is analyzed using an independent t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, and Fisher's exact test. The analysis showed that patients treated with radiation by IMRT showed better XeQOL scores (43.40±2.326 in IMRT and 52.10±2.573 in 3DCRT, p<0.001) and Eating Assessment Tool-10 (EAT-10) score (27.65±2.796 in IMRT and 33.80±1.936 in 3DCRT, p<0.001) compared to those treated with 3DCRT. Analysis of the excretion fraction (EF%) of parotid scintigraphy depicted improvement in EF% for both right and left parotids in the IMRT arm with statistical significance (for right parotid, 25.22±12.98 in IMRT and 19.60±10.17 in 3DCRT, p=0.136, and for left parotid, 28.03±12.51 in IMRT and 15.35±11.49 in 3DCRT, p=0.0019). The mean rate of flow (ROF) of saliva showed a declining trend during the end of radiotherapy treatment compared to baseline, but the mean ROF of saliva was better in IMRT compared to 3DCRT, and the difference was statistically significant. The ROF of saliva starts improving during the one-year post-radiotherapy follow-up period. Pearson's chi-square test was used to analyze the correlation between mean parotid dose with EF% of parotid scintigraphy, and it showed a negative correlation, which is statistically significant for both 3DCRT and IMRT arms. Conclusion Xerostomia can be reduced by precision radiotherapies such as the parotid-sparing IMRT technique in head and neck cancer patients, hence improving the quality of life.