Accelerated rehabilitation in treating neer type V distal clavicle fractures using anatomical locking plates with coracoclavicular ligament augmentation.

Background: There is still no gold standard treatment for Neer type V distal clavicle fractures. This study was designed to evaluate the therapeutic effects of accelerated rehabilitation in treating Neer type V fractures using anatomical locking plate (ALP) fixation with additional coracoclavicular (CC) ligament augmentation. Methods: In this retrospective study, patients who underwent ALP fixation with additional suture anchor fixation of acute Neer type V distal clavicle fracture from January 2016 to January 2021 were reviewed. Injury radiography and computed tomography (CT) were performed to determine the Neer classification. All patients performed standardized early rehabilitation exercises after surgery and were followed up for more than 12 months. The Constant-Murley score (CMS); the disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) questionnaire; visual analog scale (VAS); and the percentage of modified CC distance (MCCD%) were evaluated at the last follow-up. Results: Thirty-two patients were included in this study. The mean follow-up time was 31.1 ± 10.4 months. All patients achieved bone union 6-8 weeks (7.2 ± 0.7 weeks) after surgery and were allowed to return to normal daily life. No surgery-related complications occurred in any case. The MCCD% value at the last follow-up (104.7% ± 8.5%) significantly decreased compared with preoperative MCCD% value (162.8% ± 7.2%) (p < 0.001), indicating that all patients achieved ideal fracture reduction. And all patients obtained satisfactory shoulder joint function with a mean CMS of 97.1 ± 2.6, a mean DASH score of 1.6 ± 1.3, and a mean VAS score of 0.4 ± 0.6. Conclusion: This study has demonstrated that ALP fixation with additional suture anchor fixation is a promising strategy for accelerated rehabilitation in treating patients with Neer type V fracture.

Comparing the Efficacy of Anatomical Locked Plate Fixation with Coracoclavicular Ligament Augmentation to Hook Plate Fixation in Treating Distal Clavicle Fractures.

OBJECTIVE: Hook plate fixation is the traditional method for treating distal clavicle fractures. However, in recent years, locked plate applications have emerged as a promising treatment method. This study aimed to compare the short- and mid-term clinical efficacy of anatomical locked plate fixation with coracoclavicular ligament augmentation using anchor nails to that of hook plate fixation in treating distal clavicle fractures. METHODS: This was a retrospective single-center cohort study investigating patients with distal clavicle fractures treated between January 2016 and February 2019 in Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University. Fifty-nine eligible patients who underwent either anatomical locked plate fixation with coracoclavicular ligament augmentation using anchor nails (LPF&CLA group; 20 patients) or clavicle hook plate fixation (CHPF group; 39 patients) were included. The visual analog scale (VAS) and Constant-Murley shoulder scores were used to assess shoulder function. In addition, the coracoclavicular distance between the affected and unaffected shoulders (ΔCC distance) was measured to assess the reduction. Patients were followed up at 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year postoperatively. The comparisons between the two groups were made using Student's t-test, chi-square test, or Fisher's exact test, if appropriate. RESULTS: Preoperative VAS scores were similar in both groups. At 3- and 6-month follow-up, the VAS score was significantly higher in the CHPF group than in the LPF&CLA group. In contrast, the Constant-Murley shoulder score was significantly lower in the CHPF group than in the LPF&CLA group. When the hook plates were removed, there was no statistical difference in both VAS (0.2 ± 0.4 in LPF&CLA group vs. 0.5 ± 0.5 in CHPF group, p = 0.05) and Constant-Murley shoulder (96.1 ± 3.1 in LPF&CLA group vs. 93.8 ± 5.2 in CHPF group, p = 0.08) scores at the last follow-up. Postoperatively, the ΔCC distance was 2.37 ± 1.93 mm in the LPF&CLA group and -1.56 ± 1.34 mm in the CHPF group. One year after surgery, ΔCC distance increased to 3.96 ± 1.17 mm in the LPF&CLA group and to -0.89 ± 1.39 mm in the CHPF group. CONCLUSION: For distal clavicle fractures in which the coracoclavicular ligament is disrupted, anatomical locked plate fixation with coracoclavicular ligament augmentation achieved better functional recovery and less pain than hook plate fixation at the 6-month follow-up. However, the hook plate provided better reduction throughout the follow-up period and shoulder pain could be relieved using removal surgery. Therefore, locked plates with coracoclavicular ligament augmentation favors post-surgery pain relief while harvesting similar functional outcomes to hook plate fixation.

Early clinical results of minimally invasive coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction can be maintained at a minimum of five years' follow-up.

AIMS: There is a lack of long-term data for minimally invasive acromioclavicular (AC) joint repair. Furthermore, it is not clear if good early clinical results can be maintained over time. The purpose of this study was to report long-term results of minimally invasive AC joint reconstruction (MINAR) and compare it to corresponding short-term data. METHODS: We assessed patients with a follow-up of at least five years after minimally invasive flip-button repair for high-grade AC joint dislocation. The clinical outcome was evaluated using the Constant score and a questionnaire. Ultrasound determined the coracoclavicular (CC) distance. Results of the current follow-up were compared to the short-term results of the same cohort. RESULTS: A total of 50 patients (three females, 47 males) were successfully followed up for a minimum of five years. The mean follow-up was 7.7 years (63 months to 132 months). The overall Constant score was 94.4 points (54 to 100) versus 97.7 points (83 to 100) for the contralateral side showing a significant difference for the operated shoulder (p = 0.013) The mean difference in the CC distance between the operated and the contralateral shoulder was 3.7 mm (0.2 to 7.8; p = 0.010). In total, 16% (n = 8) of patients showed recurrent instability. All these cases were performed within the first 16 months after introduction of this technique. A total of 84% (n = 42) of the patients were able to return to their previous occupations and sport activities. Comparison of short-term and long-term results revealed no significant difference for the Constant Score (p = 0.348) and the CC distance (p = 0.974). CONCLUSION: The clinical outcome of MINAR is good to excellent after long-term follow-up and no significant differences were found compared to short-term results. We therefore suggest this is a reliable technique for surgical treatment of high-grade AC joint dislocation. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(7):918-924.

Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Modified Phemister Operation with Coracoclavicular Ligament Augmentation Using Suture Anchor for Acute Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation.

BACKGROUND: Modified Phemister operation has been widely used for the treatment of acute acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocation. Additionally, the use of suture anchor for coracoclavicular (CC) fixation has been reported to provide CC stability. This study was conducted to evaluate the clinical and radiological results of a modified Phemister operation with CC ligament augmentation using suture anchor for acute AC joint dislocation. METHODS: Seventy-four patients underwent the modified Phemister operation with CC ligament augmentation using suture anchor for acute AC joint dislocation and were followed-up for an average of 12.3 months. The visual analogue scale (VAS), range of motion, Constant score, and Korean shoulder scoring system (KSS) were used for clinical assessment. Acromioclavicular interval (ACI), coracoclavicular distance (CCD), and acromioclavicular distance (ACD) were obtained to evaluate the radiological assessments. RESULTS: At the last follow-up, the mean VAS Score was 1.7 points, the mean joint range of the forward flexion was 164.6°, external rotation at the side was 61.2°, and internal rotation to the posterior was a level of T12. The mean Constant score and the mean KSS was 82.7 points and 84.2 points, respectively. At the mean ACI, CCD, and ACD, significant differences were found preoperatively and at the last follow-up. When the ACI, CCD, and ACD were compared with the contralateral unaffected shoulder at the last follow-up, the affected shoulders had significantly higher values. CONCLUSIONS: The modified Phemister operation with CC ligament augmentation using suture anchor is clinically and radiologically effective at acute AC joint dislocation.

Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Modified Phemister Operation with Coracoclavicular Ligament Augmentation Using Suture Anchor for Acute Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation

BACKGROUND: Modified Phemister operation has been widely used for the treatment of acute acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocation. Additionally, the use of suture anchor for coracoclavicular (CC) fixation has been reported to provide CC stability. This study was conducted to evaluate the clinical and radiological results of a modified Phemister operation with CC ligament augmentation using suture anchor for acute AC joint dislocation. METHODS: Seventy-four patients underwent the modified Phemister operation with CC ligament augmentation using suture anchor for acute AC joint dislocation and were followed-up for an average of 12.3 months. The visual analogue scale (VAS), range of motion, Constant score, and Korean shoulder scoring system (KSS) were used for clinical assessment. Acromioclavicular interval (ACI), coracoclavicular distance (CCD), and acromioclavicular distance (ACD) were obtained to evaluate the radiological assessments. RESULTS: At the last follow-up, the mean VAS Score was 1.7 points, the mean joint range of the forward flexion was 164.6°, external rotation at the side was 61.2°, and internal rotation to the posterior was a level of T12. The mean Constant score and the mean KSS was 82.7 points and 84.2 points, respectively. At the mean ACI, CCD, and ACD, significant differences were found preoperatively and at the last follow-up. When the ACI, CCD, and ACD were compared with the contralateral unaffected shoulder at the last follow-up, the affected shoulders had significantly higher values. CONCLUSIONS: The modified Phemister operation with CC ligament augmentation using suture anchor is clinically and radiologically effective at acute AC joint dislocation.

Treatment of Neer IIb Distal Clavicle Fractures Using Anatomical Locked Plate Fixation With Coracoclavicular Ligament Augmentation.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of Neer type IIb distal clavicle fractures treated with anatomical locking plate fixation combined with coracoclavicular ligament augmentation. METHODS: Twelve patients with Neer Type IIb distal clavicle fractures treated with anatomical locking plate fixation combined with suture anchor augmentation of the coracoclavicular ligament, were retrospectively studied. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Constant score and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score. Coracoclavicular distance was measured on plain radiographs. RESULTS: All patients were reexamined at a mean follow-up of 26.3 months (range, 25-30 months). Bony union occurred in all cases within 12 weeks and no major complications were encountered. At the final follow-up, the mean Constant score was 94 (range, 87-100) and the DASH score was 10.4 (range, 2-20). The mean postoperative coracoclavicular distance on the injured side was decreased by 40% compared with the preoperative status. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical fixation of Neer type IIb distal clavicle fractures using anatomical locking plate fixation combined with suture anchor augmentation of the coracoclavicular ligament was associated with a satisfactory functional outcome and low complication rate. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

Use of plate fixation without coracoclavicular ligament augmentation for unstable distal clavicle fractures.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiologic outcomes of unstable distal clavicle fractures treated with anatomic plate fixation without coracoclavicular ligament augmentation and to compare the outcome of Neer type IIA with that of type IIB. METHODS: Twenty-five patients with unstable distal clavicle fractures who underwent anatomic plate fixation without coracoclavicular ligament augmentation were enrolled prospectively, including 9 patients of Neer type IIA and 16 patients of Neer type IIB. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using Constant and University of California-Los Angeles (UCLA) scores. Coracoclavicular distance was measured on plain radiographs. RESULTS: Bone union was achieved in all patients. Satisfactory clinical and radiologic outcomes were obtained regardless of fracture type. After operation, the mean coracoclavicular distance on the injured side was increased by 10% compared with the uninjured side. However, between the patients who showed an increased coracoclavicular distance >10% (Constant score, 89.4 ± 3.7; UCLA score, 32.6 ± 3) and the patients with increased coracoclavicular distance <10% of the uninjured side (Constant score, 88.7 ± 3.6; UCLA score, 31.9 ± 3), there was no statistically significant difference in clinical outcomes of Constant score (P = .934) and UCLA score (P = .598). CONCLUSION: In unstable distal clavicle fractures, precontoured anatomic plate fixation without coracoclavicular ligament augmentation showed satisfactory clinical outcomes and high union rates even with a small lateral fragment. Patients who had increased coracoclavicular distance also demonstrated satisfactory shoulder functional outcomes regardless of the fracture type. Therefore, anatomic plate fixation without additional coracoclavicular ligament augmentation can be considered one of the treatment options for unstable distal clavicle fracture. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV; Case Series; Treatment Study.