Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 14 de 14
Filter
2.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38849237

ABSTRACT

In current clinical practice, qualitative or semi-quantitative measures are primarily used to report coronary artery disease on cardiac CT. With advancements in cardiac CT technology and automated post-processing tools, quantitative measures of coronary disease severity have become more broadly available. Quantitative coronary CT angiography has great potential value for clinical management of patients, but also for research. This document aims to provide definitions and standards for the performance and reporting of quantitative measures of coronary artery disease by cardiac CT.

3.
Curr Probl Cardiol ; 49(4): 102452, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38342348

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) current clinical practice guidelines recommend coronary angiography for its study. This study aims to describe the role of coronary tomography (CT) in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS). RESULTS: Patients over 18 years with a diagnosis of NSTE-ACS who did not meet high-risk criteria and consulted the emergency department of our institution were included. A total of 410 patients were included, in 7% of them, the study was not continued due to an elevated calcium score (>400 AU). 27% had no coronary lesions, 38% had non-obstructive coronary disease (plaques <50%), 27% had plaques over 50%, and 8% were not assessable. Of the total patients, 39% underwent coronary angiography, and 22% required percutaneous angioplasty. CONCLUSIONS: Performing CT in low and moderate-risk NSTE-ACS patients was feasible, avoiding invasive studies in a significant number of patients and providing extensive anatomical information.


Subject(s)
Acute Coronary Syndrome , Coronary Artery Disease , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction , Humans , Acute Coronary Syndrome/diagnostic imaging , Acute Coronary Syndrome/therapy , Angioplasty , Tomography
4.
Acad Radiol ; 30(4): 698-706, 2023 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35753936

ABSTRACT

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The coronary artery disease reporting and data system (CAD-RADS™) was recently introduced to standardise reporting. We aimed to evaluate the utility of an automatic postprocessing and reporting system based on CAD-RADS™ in suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Clinical evaluation was performed in 346 patients who underwent coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA). We compared deep learning (DL)-based CCTA with human readers for evaluation of CAD-RADS™ with commercially-available automated segmentation and manual postprocessing in a retrospective validation cohort. RESULTS: Compared with invasive coronary angiography, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of the DL model for diagnosis of CAD were 79.02%, 86.52%, 89.50%, 73.94%, and 82.08%, respectively. There was no significant difference between the DL-based and the reader-based CAD-RADS™ grading of CCTA results. Consistency testing showed that the Kappa value between the model and the readers was 0.775 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.728-0.823, p < 0.001), 0.802 (95% CI: 0.756-0.847, p < 0.001), and 0.796 (95% CI: 0.750-0.843, p < 0.001), respectively. This system reduces the time taken from 14.97 ± 1.80 min to 5.02 ± 0.8 min (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The standardised reporting of DL-based CAD-RADS™ in CCTA can accurately and rapidly evaluate suspected CAD patients, and has good consistency with grading by radiologists.


Subject(s)
Coronary Artery Disease , Coronary Stenosis , Humans , Coronary Artery Disease/diagnostic imaging , Computed Tomography Angiography/methods , Retrospective Studies , Heart , Coronary Angiography/methods , Predictive Value of Tests , Neural Networks, Computer
5.
Int J Cardiol ; 346: 86-92, 2022 Jan 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34800594

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: High mannose has previously associated with insulin resistance and cardiovascular disease (CVD). Our objective is to establish whether mannose is associated with anatomical evidence of coronary artery disease (CAD). METHODS: Plasma mannose concentrations were measured by liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry in a discovery cohort (n = 513) and a validation cohort (n = 221) of carefully phenotyped individuals. In both cohorts CAD was quantitated using state-of-the-art imaging techniques (coronary computed coronary tomography angiography (CCTA), invasive coronary angiography and optical coherence tomography). Information on subsequent CVD events/death was collected. Associations of mannose with angiographic variables and biomarkers were tested using univariate and multivariate regression models. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier estimator. RESULTS: Mannose was related to indices of CAD and features of plaque vulnerability. In the discovery cohort, mannose was a marker of quantity and quality of CCTA-proven CAD and subjects with a mannose level in the top quartile had a significantly higher risk of CVD events/death (p = 3.6e-5). In the validation cohort, mannose was significantly associated with fibrous cap thickness < 65 µm (odds ratio = 1.32 per each 10 µmol/L mannose change [95% confidence interval, 1.05-1.65]) and was an independent predictor of death (hazard ratio for mannose≥vs < 84.6 µmol/L: 4.0(95%CI, 1.4-11.3), p = 0.006). CONCLUSION: The current data add novel evidence that high mannose is a signature of CAD with a vulnerable plaque phenotype, consistently across measures of severity of vessel involvement and independent of the traditional correlates of CVD, and that it is an independent predictor of incident adverse outcomes.


Subject(s)
Coronary Artery Disease , Mannose , Biomarkers , Computed Tomography Angiography , Coronary Angiography , Coronary Artery Disease/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Predictive Value of Tests , Prognosis , Risk Factors , Severity of Illness Index
7.
Arch Cardiol Mex ; 89(3): 248-253, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31588134

ABSTRACT

Coronary artery aneurysms are described as a localized dilatation that exceeds the normal diameter by 1.5 times. This is a rare condition; its incidence varies from 0.3% up to 5.3% of all coronary angiographies. Those aneurysms that exceed 4 times the diameter of a normal artery are considered giant aneurysms, which are even more uncommon, presenting between 0.02% and 0.2% of all cases. There is controversy regarding its pathophysiology, however, up to 50% of the cases are related to atherosclerosis. They are diagnosed more frequently between the sixth and seventh decade of life. The main clinical manifestations are related to ischemic heart disease. Regarding their treatment, there is no general consensus towards its management in adult patients. The options are medical, surgical or percutaneous treatment. We report the presence of a giant aneurysm of the right coronary artery and giant ectasia of the left coronary system with active thrombosis in a man with history of an abdominal aortic aneurysm, with endovascular treatment and a non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction with no reperfusion strategy, who required a coronary computed tomography, identifying the anatomical characteristics of this disease.


Los aneurismas de las arterias coronarias se definen como una dilatación localizada que excede el diámetro normal en 1.5 veces. Esta es una condición poco frecuente, su incidencia varía del 0.3 hasta el 5.3% de las angiografías coronarias. Los aneurismas que exceden cuatro veces el diámetro del vaso normal se consideran gigantes. Estos son aún más raros y se presentan en el 0.02 a 0.2% de todos los casos. Existe controversia en cuanto a su fisiopatología, sin embargo, hasta el 50% de los casos se relacionan con la aterosclerosis. Se diagnostican más frecuentemente entre la sexta y séptima décadas de vida. Las principales manifestaciones clínicas están relacionadas con la cardiopatía isquémica. Respecto a su tratamiento, no existe un consenso del manejo en los pacientes adultos, las opciones son: médico, quirúrgico o intervencionismo. Reportamos la presencia de un aneurisma gigante de la coronaria derecha y ectasia gigante del sistema izquierdo con trombosis activa en un hombre con antecedentes de un aneurisma en la aorta abdominal, tratado por vía endovascular, e infarto agudo al miocardio sin elevación del segmento ST no reperfundido. Requirió de estudio de angiotomografía coronaria, el cual permitió la identificación de las características anatómicas de esta enfermedad.

8.
Arch. cardiol. Méx ; 89(3): 248-253, jul.-sep. 2019. tab, graf
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1149074

ABSTRACT

Resumen Los aneurismas de las arterias coronarias se definen como una dilatación localizada que excede el diámetro normal en 1.5 veces. Esta es una condición poco frecuente, su incidencia varía del 0.3 hasta el 5.3% de las angiografías coronarias. Los aneurismas que exceden cuatro veces el diámetro del vaso normal se consideran gigantes. Estos son aún más raros y se presentan en el 0.02 a 0.2% de todos los casos. Existe controversia en cuanto a su fisiopatología, sin embargo, hasta el 50% de los casos se relacionan con la aterosclerosis. Se diagnostican más frecuentemente entre la sexta y séptima décadas de vida. Las principales manifestaciones clínicas están relacionadas con la cardiopatía isquémica. Respecto a su tratamiento, no existe un consenso del manejo en los pacientes adultos, las opciones son: médico, quirúrgico o intervencionismo. Reportamos la presencia de un aneurisma gigante de la coronaria derecha y ectasia gigante del sistema izquierdo con trombosis activa en un hombre con antecedentes de un aneurisma en la aorta abdominal, tratado por vía endovascular, e infarto agudo al miocardio sin elevación del segmento ST no reperfundido. Requirió de estudio de angiotomografía coronaria, el cual permitió la identificación de las características anatómicas de esta enfermedad.


Abstract Coronary artery aneurysms are described as a localized dilatation that exceeds the normal diameter by 1.5 times. This is a rare condition; its incidence varies from 0.3% up to 5.3% of all coronary angiographies. Those aneurysms that exceed 4 times the diameter of a normal artery are considered giant aneurysms, which are even more uncommon, presenting between 0.02% and 0.2% of all cases. There is controversy regarding its pathophysiology, however, up to 50% of the cases are related to atherosclerosis. They are diagnosed more frequently between the sixth and seventh decade of life. The main clinical manifestations are related to ischemic heart disease. Regarding their treatment, there is no general consensus towards its management in adult patients. The options are medical, surgical or percutaneous treatment. We report the presence of a giant aneurysm of the right coronary artery and giant ectasia of the left coronary system with active thrombosis in a man with history of an abdominal aortic aneurysm, with endovascular treatment and a non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction with no reperfusion strategy, who required a coronary computed tomography, identifying the anatomical characteristics of this disease.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Aged , Thrombosis/diagnostic imaging , Coronary Aneurysm/diagnostic imaging , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/therapy , Dilatation, Pathologic/diagnostic imaging , Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction/physiopathology
9.
Arch Cardiol Mex ; 89(3): 227-232, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31967588

ABSTRACT

Coronary artery aneurysms are described as a localized dilatation that exceeds the normal diameter by 1.5 times. This is a rare condition; its incidence varies from 0.3% up to 5.3% of all coronary angiographies. Those aneurysms that exceed 4 times the diameter of a normal artery are considered giant aneurysms, which are even more uncommon, presenting between 0.02% and 0.2% of all cases. There is controversy regarding its pathophysiology, however, up to 50% of the cases are related to atherosclerosis. They are diagnosed more frequently between the sixth and seventh decade of life. The main clinical manifestations are related to ischemic heart disease. Regarding their treatment, there is no general consensus toward its management in adult patients. The options are medical, surgical, or percutaneous treatment. We report the presence of a giant aneurysm of the right coronary artery and giant ectasia of the left coronary system with active thrombosis in a man with a history of an abdominal aortic aneurysm, with endovascular treatment and a non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction with no reperfusion strategy, who required a coronary computed tomography, identifying the anatomical characteristics of this disease.


Los aneurismas de las arterias coronarias se definen como una dilatación localizada que excede el diámetro normal en 1.5 veces. Esta es una condición poco frecuente, su incidencia varía del 0.3 hasta el 5.3% de las angiografías coronarias. Los aneurismas que exceden cuatro veces el diámetro del vaso normal se consideran gigantes. Estos son aún más raros y se presentan en el 0.02 a 0.2% de todos los casos. Existe controversia en cuanto a su fisiopatología, sin embargo, hasta el 50% de los casos se relacionan con la aterosclerosis. Se diagnostican más frecuentemente entre la sexta y séptima décadas de vida. Las principales manifestaciones clínicas están relacionadas con la cardiopatía isquémica. Respecto a su tratamiento, no existe un consenso del manejo en los pacientes adultos, las opciones son: médico, quirúrgico o intervencionismo. Reportamos la presencia de un aneurisma gigante de la coronaria derecha y ectasia gigante del sistema izquierdo con trombosis activa en un hombre con antecedentes de un aneurisma en la aorta abdominal, tratado por vía endovascular, e infarto agudo al miocardio sin elevación del segmento ST no reperfundido. Requirió de estudio de angiotomografía coronaria, el cual permitió la identificación de las características anatómicas de esta enfermedad.


Subject(s)
Coronary Aneurysm/diagnostic imaging , Thrombosis/diagnostic imaging , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Aged , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/therapy , Dilatation, Pathologic/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Male , Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction/physiopathology
10.
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging ; 34(9): 1473-1483, 2018 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29696452

ABSTRACT

Routine use of CCTA to triage Emergency Department (ED) chest pain can reduce ED length of stay while providing accurate diagnoses. We evaluated the effectiveness of using Computer Aided Diagnosis in the triage of low to intermediate risk emergency chest pain patients with Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography (CCTA). Using 64 and 320 slice CT scanners, we compared the diagnostic capability of computer aided diagnosis to human readers in 923 ED patients with chest pain. We calculated sensitivity, specificity, Positive Predictive Value and Negative Predictive Value for cases performed on each scanner. We calculated the area under the Receiver Operator Curve (ROC) comparing results for the two scanners to Computer Aided Diagnosis performance as compared to the human reader. We examined index and 30 Day outcomes by diagnosis for each scanner and the human reader. 60% of cases could be triaged by the computer. Sensitivity was approximately 85% for both scanners, with specificity at 50.6% for the 64 slice and at 56.5% for the 320 slice scanner (per person measures). The NPV was 97.8 and 97.1 for the 64 and 320 slice scanners, respectively. Results for the four major vessels were similar with negative predictive values ranging from 97 to 100%. The ROC for Computer Aided Diagnosis for the 64 and 320 Slice Scanners, using the human reader as the gold standard was 0.6794 and 0.7097 respectively. The index and 30 day outcomes were consistent for the human reader and Computer Aided Diagnosis interpretation. Although Computer Aided Diagnosis with CCTA cannot serve completely as a substitute for human reading, it offers excellent potential as a triage tool in busy EDs.


Subject(s)
Angina Pectoris/diagnostic imaging , Computed Tomography Angiography , Coronary Stenosis/diagnostic imaging , Adult , Algorithms , Angina Pectoris/etiology , Chest Pain/diagnostic imaging , Chest Pain/etiology , Coronary Angiography , Coronary Stenosis/complications , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Predictive Value of Tests , Retrospective Studies , Sensitivity and Specificity , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
11.
J Thorac Dis ; 9(Suppl 9): S959-S968, 2017 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28894602

ABSTRACT

Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BRS) represent a novel approach for coronary revascularization offering several advantages as compared to current generation DES, potentially reducing rate of late adverse events and avoiding permanent vessel caging. Nevertheless, safety concerns have been raised for an increased risk of scaffold thrombosis (ScT) in both early and late phases, probably related to a suboptimal scaffold implantation. In this context, the use of different imaging methodologies has been strongly suggested in order to guarantee an optimal implantation. We herein analyze the different imaging methodologies available to assess BRS after implantation and at follow-up.

12.
Acta Cardiol ; 70(6): 647-52, 2015 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26717212

ABSTRACT

AIMS: Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS) is an important diagnostic tool in the management of patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD). However, the presence of mild-moderate perfusion defects can be challenging and may lead to unnecessary cardiac catheterization. Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) is a method with excellent accuracy in the evaluation of CAD, but its role in this setting of patients has not been fully defined. This study aims to assess the potential of CCTA in the prediction of cardiac adverse events in patients with suspected CAD with non-significant perfusion defects by MPS. METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted a cohort study in 292 patients presenting with non-significant perfusion defects by MPS undergoing a CCTA. The patients were followed for a mean of 34 months for occurrence of major cardiac adverse events - MACE. The majority of the patients (64.7%) were male, with a mean age of 57.9 ± 12.6 years. During the follow-up there were 37 MACE. In multivariate Cox proportional hazards model, hypertension and CCTA were independent predictors of MACE. The patients who presented a significant coronary obstruction by CCTA had a high risk of MACE (HR 15.3; 95% CI 4.06 to 57.90; P < 0.001). Kaplan-Meier curve showed a significant difference (log-rank χ²; P < 0.001) using CCTA in predicting MACE. CONCLUSION: CCTA carries a powerful prognostic value in predicting adverse events in patients with suspected CAD and MPS with mild-moderate perfusion defects and may be useful in risk stratification of these patients.


Subject(s)
Coronary Angiography/methods , Coronary Artery Disease/diagnostic imaging , Coronary Circulation/physiology , Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon/methods , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Coronary Artery Disease/physiopathology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Predictive Value of Tests , Prospective Studies
13.
J Res Med Sci ; 19(2): 134-8, 2014 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24778667

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) is a well-known method for evaluating anatomic coronary stenosis, but the reliability of CCTA to predict cardiovascular events is an issue of controversy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective observational study, 58 patients with acute chest pain and low-to-moderate risk were selected and CCTA was performed on them. During follow up, the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), defined as, cardiac death, myocardial infarction or coronary revascularization, were evaluated. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of CCTA for the occurrence of MACE, at the six-month follow up, were also evaluated. RESULTS: A total of nine (15.5 %) were positive in terms of the MACE criteria and they all had positive CCTA results. It seemed that there was 100% sensitivity for CCTA in predicting the occurrence of MACE. Forty-nine patients had no MACE, among whom 48 patients had negative CCTA. The specificity of CCTA in predicting the occurrence of MACE was 98%. All patients with positive CCTA showed significant stenosis in angiography. CONCLUSION: It appears that CCTA allows us to predict the prognosis of patients with acute chest pain and low-to moderate-risk in terms of MACE occurrence.

14.
Heart Int ; 8(1): e1, 2013 Jan 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24179635

ABSTRACT

Perioperative cardiac events can be a major consequence of surgery. The American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association has set out guidelines to aid physicians in identifying patients at the highest risk for these events. The guidelines do recommend for some patients to undergo non-invasive cardiac stress testing for further risk stratification, but their sensitivity and specificity for predicting cardiac events is not optimal. With more data emerging of the superior performance of computed coronary tomography angiography (CCTA) compared to non-invasive stress testing, CCTA could be more useful in risk stratification for these patients.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...