Diaphragmatic and Pulmonary Functions Following an Ultrasound-Guided Supraclavicular Approach Versus a Costoclavicular Approach of a Brachial Plexus Block: A Randomized Study.

INTRODUCTION: A costoclavicular brachial plexus block is an emerging infraclavicular approach that targets the cords lateral to the axillary artery, providing rapid onset of sensory-motor blockade. However, the incidence of hemi-diaphragmatic paralysis (HDP), a potential complication, remains unclear compared to the widely used supraclavicular (SC) approach. This study aimed to compare the incidence of HDP between ultrasound-guided costoclavicular and SC brachial plexus blocks. OBJECTIVES: To compare the influence of ultrasound-guided SC and costoclavicular brachial plexus blocks on diaphragmatic excursion, thickness, and contractility along with pulmonary function. MATERIALS AND METHODS:  This prospective, randomized, observer-blinded controlled trial included 60 patients undergoing below-shoulder surgeries. Patients were randomized to receive either ultrasound-guided SC (Group S) or costoclavicular (Group C) brachial plexus block with 0.5% levobupivacaine. The diaphragmatic function was assessed using ultrasonographic evaluation of diaphragm thickness and diaphragmatic thickness fraction (DTF) pre- and postblock. Pulmonary function tests (PFTs) (forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), and peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR)) were performed preblock and two hours postblock. Block characteristics were compared. RESULTS: The SC group exhibited a significantly larger reduction in DTF from preblock to postblock compared to the costoclavicular group (mean ΔDTF: 34.38% vs. 14.01%, p<0.01). Both groups showed significant declines in FVC, FEV1, and PEFR postblock, but the magnitude of deterioration was significantly greater in the SC group, displaying no significant difference in block characteristics. CONCLUSION: The costoclavicular brachial plexus block demonstrated superior preservation of diaphragmatic contractility and lesser deterioration of PFTs compared to the SC approach while being equally effective. These findings highlight the potential benefits of the costoclavicular technique in minimizing diaphragmatic dysfunction and respiratory impairment, particularly in patients at risk for respiratory complications.

Ultrasound guided costoclavicular block in pediatric population: A prospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: The costoclavicular space serves as an alternative approach to the infraclavicular brachial plexus block, and numerous studies in adults have demonstrated promising outcomes for distal upper limb surgery. Blocking the brachial plexus at this level is potentially advantageous because the cords are relatively superficial, located in close proximity to each other and easily identified using ultrasound. AIMS: This study aimed to assess the success rate and feasibility of costoclavicular block in children undergoing unilateral below elbow upper limb surgery. METHODS: Thirty children aged 2-12 years scheduled for unilateral below elbow surgery under general anesthesia were included. Costoclavicular block was performed under ultrasound and nerve stimulator guidance with 0.5% ropivacaine, 0.5 mL/kg. Success was evaluated based on the absence of significant hemodynamic response to skin incision made 20 min after the block. The sono-anatomy of costoclavicular space, ease of needling, complications, and the post-operative pain scores were assessed. RESULTS: The mean age and weight of the children were 6.5 ± 3.8 years and 19.7 ± 9.1 kg, respectively. The success rate of costoclavicular block in our cohort is 100%. Sonographic visualization was graded as excellent (Likert Scale 2) in 90% of cases. The plexus was located at a depth of 1.4 ± 0.3 cm from the skin, the lateral extent of cords from the artery was 0.8 ± 0.4 cm and they were observed inferior and lateral to the artery. The mean needling time was 3.6 ± 1.1 min. None of the children experienced complications such as vascular or pleural puncture, hematoma, Horner's syndrome or diaphragmatic palsy. Postoperative pain scores were low, and no rescue analgesia was required. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, the costoclavicular block exhibited a notably high success rate in pediatric population. This study substantiates that the three cords of the brachial plexus are consistently visible and superficial during ultrasound examination using this approach, confirming their separation from vascular structures and the reliable achievement of blockade without observed complications.

The Morphology of the Dorsal Part of the First Rib in Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome Patients: A Retrospective Clinical Study.

BACKGROUND: The recurrence or persistence of symptoms after thoracic outlet decompression (TOD) in patients with neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome (NTOS) is not uncommon. Some authors have shown significantly better clinical outcomes in patients who underwent TOD with exarticulation of the first rib compared to a group who underwent TOD with preservation of the dorsal portion of the first rib. Several other case series have shown significant improvement after redo surgery with removal of the dorsal first rib remnant. This indicates the importance of the dorsal part of the first rib in NTOS. However, radical exarticulation may not always be necessary. In this study, we tried to answer the question of whether there is a morphological difference in the dorsal part of the first rib in NTOS patients that might help in the diagnosis and treatment of NTOS. METHODS: We used the CT data of 21 NTOS patients who underwent TOD surgery and measured the dorsal part of the first rib, then compared them with a quota sample. RESULTS: We found no difference in the dorsal part of the first rib between NTOS patients and the quota sample in our data. CONCLUSIONS: As there was no detectable difference, we were not able to use these data to help decide whether exarticulation is necessary in achieving adequate symptom relief. Therefore, we advocate exarticulation of the first rib when TOD is indicated.

Combined Infraclavicular-Suprascapular Nerve Blocks Compared With Interscalene Block for Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind, and Comparative Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: The gold standard postoperative analgesia protocol for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair procedures is the interscalene block (ISB), which prevents the significant consequences of phrenic nerve block associated with hemidiaphragmatic paralysis (HDP). The infraclavicular brachial plexus block (BPB) combined with the suprascapular nerve block (SSNB) had the same analgesic efficacy as the infraclavicular BPB alone, with no effect on respiration. OBJECTIVES: Therefore, the study aimed to assess the HDP and analgesic efficacy of both approaches in controlling pain following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair surgeries. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective, randomized, double-blind, and comparative clinical trial. SETTING: The study comprised 66 patients. They were separated into 2 equal parallel groups 33 patients each: the ISB group and the costoclavicular and suprascapular block (CSB) group. METHODS: The ISB group obtained the ISB followed by the general anesthesia. The CSB group received infraclavicular blockade using the costoclavicular approach and SSNB followed by general anesthesia. RESULTS: Considering morphine utilization during the first day following the operation, the groups demonstrated an insignificant difference. The CSB group showed a decreased rate of diaphragmatic paralysis. LIMITATIONS: There was no control group. And, the blocks might take a long time to be performed up to 30 minutes. Also, there were no validated criteria to define HDP based on M-mode ultrasound measurements. CONCLUSIONS: The employment of the costoclavicular block in combination with the suprascapular block may provide a comparable analgesic potency to the sole use of the standard ISB with no HDP.

Ultrasound-guided Retroclavicular Approach Versus Costoclavicular Approach of Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block for Upper Limb Surgeries.

BACKGROUND: Regional anesthesia for an upper limb provides many advantages over general anesthesia, especially in orthopedic surgery. OBJECTIVES: This trial aimed to compare a retroclavicular approach to the infraclavicular brachial plexus with a costoclavicular approach in term of needle time, image time, and procedure time, and comparing both with the classic technique for upper limb surgeries guided by ultrasound. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, single-blinded controlled trial. SETTING: Minia University, Faculty of Medicine, Anesthesia and Intensive Care Department. METHODS: Sixty patients of both sees with an American Society of Anesthesiologists  Classification of I and II, a BMI (kg/m2) of 20-35, aged from 18-60 years who were scheduled for a forearm or hand surgery under infraclavicular brachial plexus block were divided into 3 parallel equal groups. Group I (RC) received a retroclavicular approach.  Group II (CC)received a costoclavicular approach.  Group III (CT) received the classic technique. Procedure time, the sum of the imaging and needling times, was our primary outcome. Secondary outcomes were the motor and sensory block success rate 30 minutes postinjection of local anesthesia, duration of motor and sensory block, Visual Analog Score, first analgesic need, total analgesia requirements during the first postoperative 24 hours, and any complications. RESULTS: The procedure and needle times were significantly decreased in the retroclavicular group due to better needle visibility. There was no significant difference regarding sensory and motor block data. The VAS score in the first postoperative 24 hours showed no statistical significance. Regarding analgesic data and patient satisfaction, there was no statistical significance among the 3 studied groups. There were no complications in any of the used approaches. LIMITATION: Our trial did not include patients with a BMI > 35. CONCLUSIONS: The retroclavicular approach is superior because of its decreased procedure time and needle time than both the costoclavicular approach and classic approach.

Ultrasound-guided brachial plexus block at the clavicle level: A review.

The supraclavicular block (SCB) and the infraclavicular block (ICB) are introduced to meet upper extremity surgery, where the transducer or the insertion point is placed superiorly and inferiorly at the approximate midpoint of the clavicle, respectively. These two approaches are highly appealing since they clearly exhibited each cord and its associated anatomy. In addition, it directed the needle accurately with real-time imaging by ultrasound guidance. Therefore, it brought higher success rates and fewer complications. Numerous trials have recently been conducted to examine the SCB and ICB regarding the new approach, injection techniques, block dynamics, and complication of hemidiaphragmatic paresis. It was found that both approaches could improve block effectiveness and postoperative analgesia for upper extremity surgery, according to recent studies at the level of the clavicular brachial plexus block. However, there is still a lack of work comparing the clinical performance and effectiveness of both approaches with ultrasonography. This review aims to outline the current available data from clinical trials along with case reports about these two approaches and to describe the findings published in the literature during the previous 5 years. Based on these findings, we attempt to determine whether there exists a one-size-fits-all approach that has the potential to meet upper extremity surgery.

Influencia de posición del brazo en adultos para abordaje de plexo braquial costoclavicular: estudio observacional / Influence of arm position in costoclavicular approach for brachial plexus block in adult patient: observational study

Resumen: Introducción: el bloqueo de plexo braquial con abordaje costoclavicular, ofrece ventajas como sitio de inyección único, sitio adecuado para colocación de catéter de analgesia continua. Objetivo: identificar la visibilidad de los tres cordones del plexo braquial en el espacio costoclavicular según la angulación del brazo. Material y métodos: se realizó un estudio observacional descriptivo y transversal; se incluyeron 99 pacientes entre 18 a 90 años de edad, en un período de dos meses. Se describieron variables continuas, se aplicó la prueba no paramétrica de Friedman para K muestras relacionadas, una regresión lineal para confirmar la correlación entre la distancia de la piel a plexo braquial, peso e índice de masa corporal (IMC). Resultados: se encontró una menor profundidad en relación piel plexo bajo abducción del brazo a una angulación de 90o y 110o, que permite la visualización sonoanatómica del plexo braquial a nivel costoclavicular con significancia estadística. El peso es un factor independiente que determina la distancia entre la profundidad piel plexo. Conclusiones: se determinó que el abordaje del bloqueo costoclavicular ecoguiado es anatómicamente factible con elevada eficacia clínica, el cual concluye ser un sitio anatómico innovador y seguro.

Abstract: Introduction: the brachial plexus block with a costoclavicular approach offers advantages as a single injection site, being a suitable site for continuous analgesia catheter placement. Objective: to identify the visibility of the 3 brachial plexus cords in the costoclavicular space according to the angulation of the arm. Material and methods: a descriptive and cross-sectional observational study was carried out; 99 healthy patients between 18 and 90 years of age were included, in a period of two months. Continuous variables were described, the nonparametric Friedman test was applied for K related samples, a linear regression was performed to confirm the correlation between the distance from the skin to the brachial plexus, weight and body mass index (BMI). Results: a smaller depth was found in relation to the skin plexus under abduction of the arm at an angulation of 90o and 110o, which allows an adequate sonoanatomical visualization of the brachial plexus at the costoclavicular level with statistical significance. Weight is an independent factor that determine the distance between the skin plexus depth. Conclusions: it was determined that the ultrasound-guided costoclavicular block approach is anatomically feasible with greater clinical efficacy, which concludes to be an innovative and safe anatomical site.

Ultrasound-guided continuous costoclavicular block through retrograde stimulating catheter technique for postoperative analgesia in shoulder surgery: a case series.

In five patient undergoing surgery for proximal humerus fracture we investigated into postoperative analgesia provided by continuous costoclavicular block using continuous stimulating catheter. The postoperative pain scores were less than 4 in all patients except in two patients who required intravenous tramadol 50 mg as a rescue analgesic. The radiocontrast dye study executed in two patients revealed contiguous contrast spread through the brachial plexus sheath with the catheter tip in the interscalene space. We propose that a continuous costoclavicular block with a retrograde stimulating catheter is a feasible alternative regional anesthesia technique for postoperative analgesia in shoulder surgery.

Ultrasound-guided continuous costoclavicular block through retrograde stimulating catheter technique for postoperative analgesia in shoulder surgery: a case series

Abstract In five patient undergoing surgery for proximal humerus fracture we investigated into postoperative analgesia provided by continuous costoclavicular block using continuous stimulating catheter. The postoperative pain scores were less than 4 in all patients except in two patients who required intravenous tramadol 50 mg as a rescue analgesic. The radiocontrast dye study executed in two patients revealed contiguous contrast spread through the brachial plexus sheath with the catheter tip in the interscalene space. We propose that a continuous costoclavicular block with a retrograde stimulating catheter is a feasible alternative regional anesthesia technique for postoperative analgesia in shoulder surgery.

Relevance of Costovertebral Exarticulation of the First Rib in Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: A Retrospective Clinical Study.

Purpose: The failure rate for operative decompression in neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome (NTOS) is high compared to more distal nerve compression syndromes, such as cubital or carpal tunnel syndrome. Herein, we aimed to determine if a more radical approach, namely costovertebral exarticulation of the first rib, may improve the postoperative results in patients with NTOS. Methods: From October 2002 to December 2020, 105 operative decompressions in 95 patients were evaluated; in 10 cases, decompressions were performed bilaterally. We presented the clinical outcomes of 59 exarticulations compared to those of 46 conventional resections. Evaluation was performed at a minimum of one year post-operation using the DASH questionnaire. Results: The exarticulation group presented with significantly better clinical outcomes (two-sample t-test assuming unequal variances, p < 0.001). Conclusions: This study showed that significantly better results were obtained when exarticulation of the first rib was performed in patients with NTOS. This finding supports the hypothesis that, in certain cases, the proximal portion of the first rib plays a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of NTOS.

Comparison of ultrasound-guided supraclavicular and costoclavicular brachial plexus blocks in pediatric patients: a randomized clinical trial.

PURPOSE: Costoclavicular brachial plexus block has been described recently as a new technique in adults and pediatric patients. In this study, we aimed to compare the supraclavicular and costoclavicular approaches, which are claimed to be effective and practical in pediatric patients. METHODS: Sixty children were randomized to receive supraclavicular (SC group) or costoclavicular (CC group) brachial plexus blocks prior to surgical incision. Block performance times were recorded as the primary outcome. Procedural features (ideal brachial plexus cord visualization/needle pathway planning time, needle tip/shaft visualization difficulty, number of needle maneuvers, requirement of extra needle maneuvers due to insufficient local anesthetic distribution) and postoperative pain-related data (sensorimotor block intensities, Wong-Baker and FLACC pain scores and analgesic requirements) were also evaluated. To observe the tendency toward respiratory complications, ultrasonographic diaphragm movement amplitude (with M-mode) and diaphragm thickness (with B-mode) were measured postoperatively. RESULTS: A total of 56 patients were included. Block performance times [70(7-97) vs. 115(75-180) s] were significantly lower in the CC group (p < 0.01). The block success rates did not differ (p > 0.05). The incidence of hemidiaphragm paralysis was 44% in the SC group (p < 0.001), and inspiratory diaphragm thickness was significantly lower (p < 0.01). None of CC group patients experienced hemidiaphragm paralysis. All other parameters were comparable (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Although costoclavicular block did not show superiority in pain management, the block performance was perceived as more practical than supraclavicular block. We believe that costoclavicular brachial plexus block stands as a good option in upper extremity surgeries with the advantages of shorter block performance time and reduced ipsilateral hemidiaphragm paralysis risk in pediatric patients.

Comparison of the efficacy of costoclavicular space brachial plexus blockade with 0.5% versus 0.375% ropivacaine: a randomized, double-blind, single-centre, noninferiority clinical trial.

PURPOSE: Recently, more attention has been given to the costoclavicular space (CCS) as an alternative pathway for ultrasound-guided brachial plexus block (BPB). While 0.5% ropivacaine was used in most related studies, research has shown effective ultrasound-guided supraclavicular BPB using lower local anesthetic concentrations, and our preliminary data have indicated that 0.375% ropivacaine may be effective when given in the CCS. Hence, we hypothesized that the efficacy of 0.375% ropivacaine would be noninferior compared with 0.5% in ultrasound-guided BPB via the CCS. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, double-blind, single-centre, noninferiority clinical trial. Seventy patients undergoing elective forearm or hand surgery were randomly assigned to receive either 20 mL of 0.375% ropivacaine (experimental group) or 0.5% ropivacaine (control group) in the CCS for BPB. We assessed sensory and motor blockade at five, ten, 15, 20, 25, and 30 min after the injection. The primary outcome was the rate of successful BPB. Secondary outcomes included onset time, duration of sensory and motor blockade, and adverse reactions. The depth from the skin to the CCS was also recorded during the procedure. RESULTS: A total of 69 patients were evaluable for block success. There was one failed block in both groups, yielding a BPB block success rate of 97% in both groups. 0.375% Ropivacaine was noninferior to 0.5% ropivacaine (P = 0.98). There was no significant difference in the median [interquartile range (IQR)] onset time of sensory-motor blockade in the experimental group (15 [15-20] min; N = 34) compared with the control group (15 [13-20] min; N = 33; Mann-Whitney test, P = 0.48). The median [IQR] duration of sensory blockade was significantly shorter in the experimental group (455 [398-490] min vs 610 [570-655] min in the control group; Hodges-Lehmann estimator of the difference, 165 min; 95.08% confidence interval (CI), 130 to 195; P < 0.001). Likewise, the median [IQR] duration of motor blockade was significantly shorter in the experimental group (470 [409-500] min vs 625 [578-665] min in the control group; Hodges-Lehmann estimator of the difference, 165 min; 95.08% CI, 130 to 195; P < 0.001). There were no adverse reactions directly related to the technique or the ropivacaine injection in either group. CONCLUSIONS: 0.375% Ropivacainewas noninferior to 0.5% ropivacaine with regard to rate of successful ultrasound-guided costoclavicular BPB. STUDY REGISTRATION: chictr.org.cn (ChiCTR20000306570); registered 8 March 2020.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: L'espace costo-claviculaire (ECC) a récemment bénéficié d'un regain d'intérêt comme voie de substitution pour le bloc du plexus brachial (BPB) échoguidé. La ropivacaïne 0,5 % a été utilisée dans la majorité des études sur ce sujet, mais la recherche a montré un BPB supra-claviculaire échoguidé efficace en utilisant de plus faibles concentrations d'anesthésique local et nos données préliminaires ont indiqué que la ropivacaïne à 0,375 % pouvait être efficace en administration dans l'ECC. En conséquence, nous avons émis l'hypothèse selon laquelle l'efficacité de la ropivacaïne 0,375 % serait non inférieure à la ropivacaïne 0,5 % dans le BPB échoguidé via l'ECC. MéTHODES: Nous avons mené un essai clinique monocentrique de non-infériorité, randomisée en double insu. Soixante-dix patients subissant une chirurgie élective de l'avant-bras ou de la main ont été randomisés dans un groupe recevant 20 mL de ropivacaïne 0,375 % (groupe expérimental) ou de ropivacaïne 0,5 % (groupe contrôle) dans l'ECC pour un BPB. Nous avons évalué les blocs sensoriel et moteur à 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 et 30 minutes après l'injection. Le critère d'évaluation principal était le taux de succès du BPB. Les critères d'évaluation secondaires étaient, notamment, le délai d'action, la durée des blocs sensoriel et moteur, et les événements indésirables. La profondeur de la peau à l'ECC a aussi été consignée pendant la procédure. RéSULTATS: Un total de 69 patients était évaluable pour le succès du bloc. Il y a eu un échec du bloc dans chacun des deux groupes, ramenant le taux de succès du BPB à 97 % dans les deux groupes. La ropivacaïne 0,375 % a été non inférieure à la ropivacaïne 0,5 % (P = 0,98). Il n'y a pas eu de différence significative concernant le délai d'action médian (plage interquartile [PIQ]) du bloc sensori-moteur dans le groupe expérimental (15 [15 à 20] minutes; n = 34) comparativement au groupe contrôle (15 [13 à 20] minutes; n = 33; test de Mann­Whitney, P = 0,48). La durée médiane [PIQ] du bloc sensitif a été significativement plus courte dans le groupe expérimental (455 [398 à 490] minutes contre 610 [570 à 655] minutes dans le groupe contrôle; estimateur de la différence de Hodges­Lehmann, 165 minutes; intervalle de confiance [IC] à 95,08 % : 130 à 195; P < 0,001). De même, la durée médiane [PIQ] du bloc moteur a été significativement plus courte dans le groupe expérimental (470 [409 à 500] minutes contre 625 [578 à 665] minutes dans le groupe contrôle; estimateur de la différence de Hodges­Lehmann, 165 minutes; IC à 95,08 %, 130 à 195; P < 0,001). Il n'y a pas eu d'événement indésirable directement lié à la technique ou à l'injection de ropivacaïne dans l'un ou l'autre groupe. CONCLUSIONS: La ropivacaïne 0,375 % a été non inférieure à la ropivacaïne 0,5 % en ce qui concerne le taux de succès du BPB costo-claviculaire échoguidé. ENREGISTREMENT DE L'éTUDE: chictr.org.cn (ChiCTR20000306570); Enregistrée le 8 mars 2020.

Bloqueo costoclavicular del plexo braquial: una revisión de la evidencia actual / Costoclavicular brachial plexus block: A review of current evidence

El bloqueo del plexo braquial puede realizarse mediante varios abordajes. El bloqueo costoclavicular ecoguiado en el espacio costoclavicular (CCS) descrito recientemente ha ganado popularidad, presentando resultados prometedores para la anestesia del miembro superior y la analgesia postoperatoria. Este bloqueo se presenta como una alternativa al abordaje infraclavicular tradicional, con resultados que muestran una mejor calidad del bloqueo y un menor riesgo de complicaciones. Este artículo presenta una revisión narrativa de la literatura y la evidencia actual disponible. Se realizó una búsqueda bibliográfica en la base de datos PubMed abarcando los artículos relevantes publicados entre 2015 y diciembre de 2020.(AU)

The brachial plexus block can be performed through several approaches. The recently described ultrasound-guided costoclavicular block at the costoclavicular space has gained popularity, presenting promising results for upper limb anesthesia and postoperative analgesia. This block comes as an alternative to the traditional infraclavicular approach, with results suggesting improved block quality and reduced risk of complications. This article presents a narrative review of the literature and the current evidence available. A bibliographic search was conducted in the database PubMed and relevant articles published between 2015 and December 2020 to this topic were selected.(AU)

Tratamiento anestésico mediante bloqueo del plexo braquial costoclavicular con analgesia controlada por el paciente en Pediatría: caso clínico / Anesthetic management using costoclavicular brachial plexus block with patient-controlled analgesia in Pediatrics: A case report

El bloqueo del plexo braquial costoclavicular (CBPB) ha venido recibiendo atención creciente como técnica eficaz en la cirugía de la parte superior del brazo realizada sin parálisis frénica. Sin embargo, se carece de estudios en niños. Se realizó CBPB a una niña de 10 años sometida a osteotomía radial y ulnar programada, debido a exostosis múltiples cartilaginosos y elongación ulnar. Se realizó CBPB con administración de un bolo de 10ml de levobupivacaína al 0,25%, sustituyéndose secuencialmente el catéter en el espacio costoclavicular derecho. Tras la cirugía, se inició infusión continua de 2ml/h de levobupivacaína al 0,17% a través de catéter, junto con analgesia controlada por el paciente (PCA) de 3ml de levobupivacaína al 0,17% con bloqueo de 60 min. La paciente se quejó de dolor de nivel 5/10 de la escala numérica (NRS) transcurridas 2h de la cirugía, que mejoró inmediatamente tras la administración del bolo. Por lo demás, la analgesia inducida por CBPB fue efectiva (NRS ≤ 2). El CBPB con PCA puede aportar una analgesia adecuada en casos pediátricos.(AU)

Anesthetic management using costoclavicular brachial plexus block with patient-controlled analgesia in pediatrics: a case report Abstract The costoclavicular brachial plexus block (CBPB) has been receiving increasing attention as an effective technique for upper arm surgery conducted without phrenic paralysis. However, studies in children are lacking. CBPB was applied to a 10 year-old girl undergoing scheduled radial and ulnar osteotomy due to multiple cartilaginous exostoses and ulnar lengthening. CBPB was performed with a bolo administration of 10 mL of 0.25% levobupivacaine, and the catheter was sequentially replaced in the right costoclavicular space. After surgery, a continuous infusion of 0.17% levobupivacaine through a catheter was initiated at 2 mL/h, along with patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) of 3 mL 0.17% levobupivacaine with a 60-minute lock out. The patient complained of 5/10 pain on the numerical rating scale (NRS) 2 hours after surgery, which improved immediately after bolus administration. The analgesia induced by CBPB was otherwise effective (NRS ≤ 2). CBPB with PCA may provide adequate analgesia in pediatric cases.(AU)

Efectividad del bloqueo de plexo braquial con abordaje costoclavicular y factores que modifican la sonoanatomía en pacientes pediátricos / Effectiveness of brachial plexus block with costoclavicular approach and factors modifying sonoanatomy in pediatric patients

Resumen: El bloqueo de plexo braquial en pediatría se ha posicionado como una buena alternativa para procedimientos quirúrgicos de la extremidad superior, en especial a partir del advenimiento de la ultrasonografía. El objetivo del estudio fue evaluar la efectividad del bloqueo con el abordaje costoclavicular en la población pediátrica, comparar la sonoanatomía de la ventana costoclavicular con la coracoidea y determinar si la posición del brazo impacta en la imagen ultrasonográfica. Se evaluaron un total de ocho pacientes con fracturas de miembro superior. De los ocho pacientes, cinco eran de género masculino (62.5%), tres de género femenino (37.5%) con una edad promedio de 8.8 años. Se realizó rastreo ultrasonográfico comparando la sonoanatomía del abordaje costoclavicular y coracoideos, observando mejor los cordones del plexo braquial y estructuras vasculares con el abordaje costoclavicular. Con el brazo en abducción 90 y 110o se optimizó la visualización de las estructuras neurovasculares y mejoría en la calidad del bloqueo. La dosis de ropivacaína fue de 1.5 mg/kg entre el 0.3-0.5%, con un tiempo de bloqueo motor promedio de 6.4 horas, y bloqueo sensitivo promedio de 11 horas. No se presentaron complicaciones. En conclusión, el bloqueo de plexo braquial por vía costoclavicular en la población pediátrica es una técnica segura.

Abstract: Pediatric brachial plexus block has become a good alternative for upper extremity surgical procedures, especially since the advent of ultrasonography. The main aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the blockade with the costoclavicular approach in the pediatric population, and compare the sonoanatomy of the costoclavicular window with the coracoid one, and determinate if the position of the arm has an impact on the ultrasound image. A total of eight patients with upper limb fractures were evaluated. Of the eight patients, five were male (62.5%), three female (37.5%) with a mean age of 8.8 years. Ultrasonographic screening was performed comparing the sonoanatomy of the costoclavicular and coracoid approaches, better observing the brachial plexus cords and vascular structures with the costoclavicular approach. With the arm abducted 90 and 110o, a better visualization of the neurovascular structures and an improvement in the quality of the block was obtained. The ropivacaine dose was 1.5 mg/kg between 0.3-0.5%, with an average motor block time of 6.7 hours, and an average sensory block of 11.25 hours. There were not complications. In conclusion, the brachial plexus block via the costoclavicular approach in the pediatric population is a safe technique.

A Comparison of Anesthetic Quality between Single and Septum-based Double Injection for Ultrasound-Guided Costoclavicular Block: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: In a costoclavicular (CC) approach of an ultrasound (US)-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block (BPB), a septum between the lateral and the medial/posterior cords can result in an incomplete block. We hypothesized that double injections in each compartment between the septum would result in a higher success rate of BPB than a single injection in the center of the CC space. OBJECTIVES: This study was conducted to confirm the superiority of block quality achieved by septum-based double injections (experimental group; group E) over single injection in the center of the CC space (control group; group C). STUDY DESIGN: A randomized, controlled trialSETTING: Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Anam Hospital. METHODS: Sixty-eight patients who underwent upper extremity surgery randomly received a single (SI group, n = 34) or a septum-based double injection (DI group, n = 34) using the CC approach. Ten milliliters of 2% lidocaine, 10 mL of 0.75% ropivacaine, and 5 mL of normal saline were used for BPB in each group (total 25 mL). Sensory-motor blockade of the ipsilateral median, radial, ulnar, and musculocutaneous nerves was assessed by a blinded observer at 5-minute intervals for 30 minutes immediately after local anesthesia administration. The assessed variables were the success rate, the rate of all 4 nerves blockade, and onset time. RESULTS: Thirty minutes after the block, the success rate was significantly higher in the DI group than in the SI group (64.7% in the SI group vs 91.2% in the DI group, P = 0.009), and the rate of all 4 nerves blockade also significantly increased in the DI group compared to the SI group (44.1% in the SI group vs 91.2% in the DI group, P = 0). The onset time was significantly shortened in the DI group compared with the SI group (26.3 ± 5.6 min in the SI group vs 21.3 ± 6.2 min in the DI group, P = 0.010). LIMITATIONS: We considered that the location of the septum was always between the lateral cord superficially and the medial/posterior cords below it. In some patients in whom the septum was not visible, a superficial lateral cord was injected first, and then deep medial and posterior cords were injected, assuming that the 2 compartments were divided by the septum. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the SI, the septum-based DI of CC approach increased the success rate and the rate of all 4 nerves blockade and shortened the onset time.

Anesthetic management using costoclavicular brachial plexus block with patient-controlled analgesia in Pediatrics: A case report.

The costoclavicular brachial plexus block (CBPB) has been receiving increasing attention as an effective technique for upper arm surgery conducted without phrenic paralysis. However, studies in children are lacking. CBPB was applied to a 10 year-old girl undergoing scheduled radial and ulnar osteotomy due to multiple cartilaginous exostoses and ulnar lengthening. CBPB was performed with a bolus administration of 10 mL of 0.25% levobupivacaine, and the catheter was sequentially replaced in the right costoclavicular space. After surgery, a continuous infusion of 0.17% levobupivacaine through a catheter was initiated at 2 mL/h, along with patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) of 3 mL 0.17% levobupivacaine with a 60-min lock out. The patient complained of 5/10 pain on the numerical rating scale (NRS) 2 h after surgery, which improved immediately after bolus administration. The analgesia induced by CBPB was otherwise effective (NRS ≤ 2). CBPB with PCA may provide adequate analgesia in paediatric cases.

Costoclavicular brachial plexus block: A review of current evidence.

The brachial plexus block can be performed through several approaches. The recently described ultrasound-guided costoclavicular block at the costoclavicular space has gained popularity, presenting promising results for upper limb anaesthesia and postoperative analgesia. This block comes as an alternative to the traditional infraclavicular approach, with results suggesting improved block quality and reduced risk of complications. This article presents a narrative review of the literature and the current evidence available. A bibliographic search was conducted in the database PubMed and relevant articles published between 2015 and December 2020 to this topic were selected.

The role of congenital malformations of the thoracic outlet in the development of the syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) represents a clinical condition caused by compression of the neurovascular structures that cross the thoracic outlet. TOS can be classified in: 1) neurogenic TOS (NTOS), 2) venous TOS (VTOS), 3) arterial TOS (ATOS). Many different causes can determine the syndrome: congenital malformations, traumas, and functional impairments. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This manuscript reviews how the congenital malformations play an important role in adult age; however, TOS also affects patients of all ages. RESULTS: Radiological imaging like X-ray (radiography), magnetic resonance and computed tomography can provide useful information to assess TOS causes and decide a potential surgery. 79% of the patients included in the first two stages of nerve, artery, vein (NAV) staging experienced excellent results with kinesiotherapy; whereas patients included in the third and fourth stage of NAV staging were subject to surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The treatment of acute forms of TOS involves thrombolysis and anticoagulant therapy; surgery is appropriate for true NTOS, vascular TOS and in some cases when conservative treatment fails.

The significance of a concomitant clavicle fracture in flail chest patients: incidence, concomitant injuries, and outcome of 12,348 polytraumata from the TraumaRegister DGU®.

PURPOSE: Isolated clavicle fractures (CF) rarely show complications, but their influence in the thorax trauma of the seriously injured still remains unclear. Some authors associate CF with a higher degree of chest injuries; therefore, the clavicle is meant to be a gatekeeper of the thorax. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the TraumaRegister DGU® (project 2017-10) was carried out involving the years 2009-2016 (ISS ≥ 16, primary admission to a trauma center). Cohort formation: unilateral and bilateral flail chest injuries (FC), respectively, with and without a concomitant CF. RESULTS: 73,141 patients (26.5% female) met the inclusion criteria and 12,348 had flail chest injuries (FC; 20.0% CF; 67.7% monolateral FC), 25,425 other rib fractures (17.7% CF), and 35,368 had no rib fractures (6.5% CF). On average, monolateral FC patients were 56.0 ± 17.9 years old and bilateral FC patients were 57.7 ± 19 years old. The ISS in unilateral and bilateral FC were 29.1 ± 11.7 and 42.2 ± 12.9 points, respectively. FC with a CF occurred more frequently with bicycle and motorbike injuries in monolateral FC and pedestrians in bilateral FC injuries and less frequently due to falls. Patients with a CF in addition to a FC had longer hospital and ICU stays, underwent artificially respiration for longer periods, and died less often than patients without a CF. The effects were highly significant in bilateral FC. CF indicates more relevant concomitant injuries of the lung, scapula, and spinal column. Moreover, CF was associated with more injuries of the extremities in monolateral CF. CONCLUSION: Due to the relevance of a concomitant CF fracture in FC, diagnostics should focus on finding CFs or rule them out. Combined costoclavicular injuries are associated with a significantly higher degree of thoracic injuries and longer hospital stays.