IgG4-related disease: Effectiveness evaluation through Umehara-Okazaki 2011 and ACR/EULAR 2019 diagnostic criteria.

BACKGROUND: IgG4-related disease (IgG4-RD) is a rare, systemic immune-mediated fibro-inflammatory condition with an unclear etiology and pathophysiology, potentially affecting multiple organs. It presents with common clinical, radiological, and serological characteristics. This study aims to compare the latest two IgG4-RD classification and diagnostic criteria: Umehara-Okazaki 2011 and ACR/EULAR 2019. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In a retrospective cross-sectional study conducted across two centers from January 2010 to July 2023, we included patients suspected of having IgG4-RD from various hospital departments. Patients finally diagnosed with other pathologies were excluded. The remaining suspected IgG4-RD cases were evaluated using both Umehara-Okazaki 2011 and ACR/EULAR 2019 criteria. RESULTS: Out of 34 patients with a clinical diagnosis of IgG4-RD, the Umehara-Okazaki 2011 classified 20 patients: 5 as definitive, 7 as probable, and 8 as possible cases. Applying the ACR/EULAR 2019 criteria to the same cohort resulted in the diagnosis of 9 patients. Notably, retroperitoneal fibrosis and aortitis were the most prevalent form of presentation, accounting for 25% and 22.2% of cases classified under the 2011 and 2019 criteria, respectively. DISCUSSION: The more recent and stringent ACR/EULAR 2019 criteria focus on histopathology, various forms of presentation, and analytical data, allow for a more accurate classification of patients.

Gestação de Substituição em Portugal: Orientações para a prática clínica

Introdução: A aprovação na Assembleia da República, em dezembro de 2021, da lei aplicável à Gestação de Substituição, suscita a reflexão acerca dos aspetos práticos em que o regime se concretizará e das orientações necessárias para os profissionais de saúde envolvidos. Por esse motivo, foram definidos como objetivos: analisar um conjunto de recomendações para a prática clínica no âmbito da Gestação de Substituição em países com experiência no procedimento e promover uma discussão com peritos na área da Procriação Medicamente Assistida. Material e Métodos: Foi realizada uma análise documental das publicações e documentos oficiais sobre o tema que serviu de base para o estudo de desenho qualitativo baseado em grupos focais com diferentes profissionais -médicos e psicólogos- com experiência em Procriação Medicamente Assistida. A discussão foi concretizada através de sessões via Zoom®, realizadas separadamente com os dois grupos focais. Resultados: Na discussão os peritos fizeram as suas apreciações e propostas de melhoria em relação à versão inicial do documento resultante da análise documental. Conclusão: Obteve-se uma versão consolidada do conjunto de orientações para os profissionais de saúde com as dimensões a avaliar e acompanhar junto da gestante e parte beneficiária na Gestação de Substituição.

Introducción : La aprobación por el Parlamento portugués, en diciembre de 2021, de la ley aplicable a la Gestación Subrogada, plantea la reflexión sobre los aspectos prácticos en los que se implementará el esquema y las directrices necesarias para los profesionales de la salud involucrados. Por este motivo, se definieron los siguientes objetivos: analizar un conjunto de recomendaciones para la práctica clínica en el ámbito de la gestación subrogada en países con experiencia en el procedimiento y promover un debate con expertos en el campo de la Reproducción Médicamente Asistida. Material y Métodos : Se realizó un análisis documental de publicaciones y documentos oficiales sobre el tema, que sirvió de base para el estudio de diseño cualitativo basado en focus group con diferentes profesionales -médicos y psicólogos- con experiencia en Reproducción Médicamente Asistida. La discusión se realizó a través de sesiones via Zoom®, celebradas por separado con los dos focus group. Resultados : En la discusión, los expertos realizaron sus apreciaciones y propuestas de mejora respecto a la versión inicial del documento resultante del análisis documental. Conclusión : Se obtuvo una versión consolidada del conjunto de directrices para los profesionales de la salud con las dimensiones para evaluar y dar seguimiento a la madre sustituta y a los beneficiarios en la Gestación Subrogada.

Introduction: The approval by the Portuguese Parliament, in December 2021, of the law applicable to Surrogate Pregnancy, raises reflection on the practical aspects in which the scheme will be implemented and the necessary guidelines for health professionals involved. For this reason, the following objectives were defined: to analyze a set of recommendations for clinical practice in surrogacy in countries with experience in the procedure and to promote a discussion with experts in Medically Assisted Reproduction. Material and Methods: A documental analysis of publications and official documents on the theme was conducted. This served as a basis for the qualitative design study based on focus groups with different professionals -physicians, and psychologists- with experience in Medically Assisted Reproduction. The discussion was realized through sessions via Zoom®, held separately with the two focus groups. Results : In the debate, the experts made their appreciation and proposals for improvement concerning the initial version of the document resulting from the document analysis. Conclusion : A consolidated version of the set of guidelines for health professionals was obtained with the dimensions to evaluate and follow up with the surrogate and beneficiaries in Surrogacy.

The new standardised nomenclature in Otorhinolaryngology by SEORL-CCC - ANAESTHESIA (SEDAR). Executive version 2024.

PURPOSE: After the publication of the new standardized nomenclature for the specialty of Otorhinolaryngology in 2021, a joint adaptation was carried out with the Spanish Society of Anesthesiology, Resuscitation and Pain Therapy (SEDAR), creating an executive version. In this version, the Anesthesia groups are added for those procedures that require it and, in addition, the number of acts is reduced to facilitate its implementation in the daily basis healthcare activity. The aim of this article is to update the definitive executive version of the nomenclature for the specialty of Otolaryngology. METHODS: The nomenclature published in 2021 was updated, reducing the number of acts and procedures. For this purpose, a grouping of procedures similar in description and in order and ranking has been made. Those procedures that have been grouped together have received a new description that reflects all the acts included in order to facilitate its coding but respecting the essence of the proposal of the complete version of the 2021 nomenclature. Subsequently, the private medicine committee of SEDAR has assigned the anaesthetic act for those procedures that may require it. In addition, a provisional code has been assigned for those acts that are new with respect to the latest version approved by the OMC, which allows their numerical identification. RESULTS: The executive version of the nomenclature presents a total of 234 medical acts, compared to 395 listed in the 2021 version, which are distributed by OMC classification groups and ENT subspecialties. One-hundred and fourteen procedures maintain the original OMC code, with some modifications in the description of the medical act. Other procedures also performed by ENT but listed elsewhere were kept with their same description and group and assigned OMC codes. The remaining 120 procedures are new proposals made by the scientific society and its subspecialty committees. CONCLUSIONS: The executive version of the new nomenclature of Otorhinolaryngology proposed by the SEORL-CCC and SEDAR updates the one from 2021 and is the only one valid in our specialty for its use in the private healthcare daily practice. The reduction of medical procedures, without losing richness or modifications of the surgical groups, and the allocation of the anesthesia scales, facilitates its implementation, and provides the highest standards of quality and clinical timelines.

[Ethics of care: Assessment of the ethical issues in the protocols or consensuses on mechanical restraint in force in Spain]. / Ética de los cuidados: valoración de los contenidos éticos en los protocolos o consensos de contención mecánica vigentes en España.

INTRODUCTION: Mechanical restraints are widely used in health care practice, despite the numerous ethical conflicts they raise. The aim of this study is to evaluate the ethical considerations contemplated in the current protocols on mechanical restraint in Spain. METHOD: Systematic review in PubMed, WOS and Scopus, Google and Google Scholar. An ad hoc list of 30 items was used to evaluate the ethical content of the protocols. The quality of guidelines was assessed with AGREE II. RESULTS: The need for informed consent (IC) is reflected in 72% of the documents, the IC model sheet is included in only 41% of them, the rest of the analyzed characteristics on IC are fulfilled in percentages between 6% (the document includes the need to reevaluate the indication for IC) and 31% (the document contemplates to whom it should be requested). More than 20 ethical contents are reflected in 31% of them and less than 10 in 19% of the guidelines. The quality of the guides, according to AGREE II, ranged from 27 to 116 points (maximum possible 161), with a mean score of 68.7. Only 9% of the documents were classified as high quality. Finally, the correlation between ethical content and quality measured with AGREE II was 0.75. CONCLUSIONS: The variability of ethical contents in guidelines on mechanical restraints is very high. The ethical requirements to be included in protocols, consensus or Clinical Practice Guidelines should be defined.

Experience from a regional percutaneous coronary intervention center: Aiming to assess and improve quality of care.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Ischemic heart disease is the single most common cause of death in Europe. Mortality in patients presenting with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is associated with many factors, one of which is the time delay to treatment. The purpose of this work is to analyze the coronary pathway in our region in terms of timing, taking into consideration the place of first medical contact (FMC). METHODS: Consecutive patients admitted to our center with STEMI to undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) between 2013 and 2022 were analyzed. Age, gender, and time delays were collected. Analysis was performed with IBM SPSS version 28 for a significance level of 0.05. RESULTS: We found that non-PCI centers had a significantly greater FMC to diagnosis delay and diagnosis to wire delay compared to other places of origin. Only 2.2% of patients met the 10-min FMC to diagnosis target; 44.8% met the target of 90 min from diagnosis to wire in transferred patients, while 40.6% met the 60-min target for patients admitted to a PCI center. Median patient, electrocardiogram (ECG) and logistic delays are 92.0±146.0 min, 19.0±146.0 min and 15.5±46.3 min, respectively. CONCLUSION: A significant difference between state-of-the-art targets and reality was found, depending on the place of FMC, with the worst delays in non-PCI centers. Patient delay, ECG delay, FMC to diagnosis and logistic delay are identified as key areas in which to intervene.

External validation of the 2017 ACR/EULAR classification criteria for inflammatory myopathies in a Mexican cohort: Role of autoantibodies in the diagnosis and classification of patients with inflammatory myopathies.

OBJECTIVE: This retrospective study aimed to perform the first external validation of the ACR/EULAR classification criteria for inflammatory myopathy (IIM) in a Mexican dynamic cohort where the patients were evaluated with clinical and laboratory values. As secondary objectives, we presented the clinical characteristics of the patients and included antibodies other than anti Jo1 to evaluate their impact on our population. METHODOLOGY: This study included 70 patients with IIM and 70 patients with differential diagnoses of IIM, according to the absolute score of the classification criteria. We obtained sensitivity and specificity in the modality without biopsy, and as an exploratory analysis, we added other antibodies from the myositis extended panel. We analyzed the area under the curve (AUC) of three models: score without antibodies, with anti Jo1 and with any antibody. RESULTS: The ACR/EULAR criteria showed increased specificity and at least similar sensitivity to that of the original cohort (85% sensitivity and 92% specificity), with a cohort point of >55%. When we classified patients into definite, probable, possible, and no IIM categories, by adding the extended myopathy panel, 6 of the 10 patients initially classified as "no IIM" changed their classification to "Probable IIM" and 4 to "Definite IIM"; of the 16 patients classified as "probable IIM," 15 changed their classification to "Definite IIM." CONCLUSION: Considering the limitations of this study, we concluded that the 2017 EULAR/ACR criteria for IIM classification are sensitive and specific for classifying patients with IIM in the Mexican population. Additionally, the addition of antibodies other than anti-Jo1 may improve performance in certain populations.

External validation of the 2017 ACR/EULAR classification criteria for inflammatory myopathies in a Mexican cohort: Role of autoantibodies in the diagnosis and classification of patients with inflammatory myopathies / Validación externa de los criterios de clasificación de la ACR/EULAR de 2017 para miopatías inflamatorias en una cohorte mexicana. Papel de los anticuerpos en el diagnóstico y la clasificación de pacientes con miopatías inflamatorias

Objective: This retrospective study aimed to perform the first external validation of the ACR/EULAR classification criteria for inflammatory myopathy (IIM) in a Mexican dynamic cohort where the patients were evaluated with clinical and laboratory values. As secondary objectives, we presented the clinical characteristics of the patients and included antibodies other than anti Jo1 to evaluate their impact on our population. Methodology: This study included 70 patients with IIM and 70 patients with differential diagnoses of IIM, according to the absolute score of the classification criteria. We obtained sensitivity and specificity in the modality without biopsy, and as an exploratory analysis, we added other antibodies from the myositis extended panel. We analyzed the area under the curve (AUC) of three models: score without antibodies, with anti Jo1 and with any antibody. Results: The ACR/EULAR criteria showed increased specificity and at least similar sensitivity to that of the original cohort (85% sensitivity and 92% specificity), with a cohort point of >55%. When we classified patients into definite, probable, possible, and no IIM categories, by adding the extended myopathy panel, 6 of the 10 patients initially classified as “no IIM” changed their classification to “Probable IIM” and 4 to “Definite IIM”; of the 16 patients classified as “probable IIM,” 15 changed their classification to “Definite IIM.” Conclusion: Considering the limitations of this study, we concluded that the 2017 EULAR/ACR criteria for IIM classification are sensitive and specific for classifying patients with IIM in the Mexican population. Additionally, the addition of antibodies other than anti-Jo1 may improve performance in certain populations.(AU)

Objetivo: Este estudio retrospectivo tuvo como objetivo realizar la primera validación externa de los criterios de clasificación ACR/EULAR para miopatía inflamatoria (MII) en una cohorte dinámica de pacientes mexicanos que fueron evaluados en consulta y con muestras de laboratorio. Como objetivos secundarios presentamos las características clínicas de los pacientes e incluimos anticuerpos distintos al anti-Jo1 para evaluar su impacto en nuestra población. Metodología: Este estudio incluyó a 70 pacientes con MII y 70 pacientes con diagnóstico diferencial de MII, según la puntuación absoluta de los criterios de clasificación. Obtuvimos la sensibilidad y la especificidad en la modalidad sin biopsia, y como análisis exploratorio añadimos otros anticuerpos del panel extendido de miositis. Analizamos el área bajo la curva (AUC) de tres modelos: puntuación sin anticuerpos, con anti-Jo1 y con cualquier otro anticuerpo. Resultados: Los criterios ACR/EULAR mostraron una mayor especificidad y una sensibilidad, al menos similar a la de la cohorte original (85% de sensibilidad y 92% de especificidad), con un punto de cohorte de >55%. Cuando clasificamos a los pacientes en las categorías de definitiva, probable, posible y sin MII, al agregar el panel ampliado de miopatía, 6 de los 10 pacientes clasificados inicialmente como «Sin MII» cambiaron su clasificación a «Probable MII» y 4 a «MII Definitiva»; de los 16 pacientes clasificados como «Probable MII», 15 cambiaron su clasificación a «MII Definitiva». Conclusión: Considerando las limitaciones de este estudio, concluimos que los criterios de 2017 de la EULAR/ACR para la clasificación de la MII son sensibles y específicos para clasificar a los pacientes con MII en la población mexicana. Además, la adición de anticuerpos que no sean anti-Jo1 puede mejorar la estadificación en ciertas poblaciones.(AU)

Abordaje integral del vértigo: algoritmo diagnóstico, causas, tratamientos y criterios de derivación desde la perspectiva de atención primaria. Documento de consenso SEMERGEN / Comprehensive approach to vertigo: Diagnostic algorithm, causes, treatments, and referral criteria from the perspective of primary care. SEMERGEN consensus document

El vértigo es un síntoma común que puede tener diversas causas y requerir un enfoque integral para su diagnóstico y tratamiento desde atención primaria. Se propone un algoritmo de diagnóstico basado en la clasificación propuesta por la Comisión de Otoneurología de la SEORL-PCF, que facilita la clasificación de los diferentes tipos de vértigo y proporciona criterios de derivación de pacientes desde atención primaria hacia otras especialidades. Se realiza una revisión de los tratamientos disponibles basada en la causa subyacente para un manejo terapéutico adecuado. Se espera que este documento se convierta en una herramienta valiosa para los profesionales que atienden a pacientes con vértigo. El documento se basa en evidencia científica y en la experiencia de expertos en el campo de las diferentes especialidades médicas implicadas; y busca mejorar la comprensión y el abordaje clínico del vértigo agudo desde atención primaria.(AU)

Vertigo is a common symptom that can have various causes and may require a comprehensive approach for its diagnosis and treatment from primary care. A diagnostic algorithm based on the classification proposed by the Otoneurology Commission of the SEORL-PCF is suggested, which facilitates the classification of the different types of vertigo and provides referral criteria for patients from primary care to other specialties. A review of the available treatments based on the underlying cause is conducted for appropriate therapeutic management. This document is expected to become a valuable tool for professionals treating patients with vertigo. The document is based on scientific evidence and on the experience of experts in the field from various medical specialties; and seeks to improve the understanding and clinical approach to acute vertigo from primary care.(AU)

Elaboración de una escala de puntuación predictiva de infección periamigdalina basada en signos y síntomas / Design of a predictive score table for peritonsillar infection based on signs and symptoms

Introducción La infección periamigdalina (IPA) supone un motivo de consulta urgente entre las molestias de garganta. Un diagnóstico diferido o incorrecto puede comprometer la vía aerodigestiva alta y resultar mortal en su evolución. Nuestro objetivo fue desarrollar un modelo predictivo de presencia de IPA que ayude en su rápida detección. Pacientes y métodos Un estudio observacional retrospectivo de 66 meses desde 2017 fue desarrollado en un hospital comarcal y su centro terciario de referencia, recogiendo datos de todos los pacientes diagnosticados de IPA y un volumen proporcional de sujetos con sintomatología faríngea sin IPA. Recopilación de datos clínicos, exploratorios y demográficos entre participantes. Su mayor riesgo relativo de presencia de IPA los etiquetó como variables a testar. Elaboración de una escala de puntuación de probabilidad de padecerla y análisis de regresión logística, con obtención de la curva ROC que ofreciera mejor correlación diagnóstica. Validación interna y cálculo de los valores predictivos de este modelo. Resultados Sobre 348 casos de IPA, la escala de valoración puntuó la presencia de 6 variables: trismus (3), disfagia-odinofagia unilateral (2), abombamiento velar (2), otalgia refleja (1), faringolalia (1) y edad de 16-46 años (1). Con un rango de 0 a 10, un cut-off≥6 ofreció una sensibilidad del 96,1%, una especificidad del 93,9% y una eficienca del 94,9%. El área bajo la curva ROC fue de 0,979. Conclusiones La validación interna de este modelo basado en signos y síntomas la faculta como herramienta muy útil para detectar precozmente IPA en otorrinolaringología y atención primaria (AU)

Background Peritonsillar infection (PTI) is a reason for urgent consultation due to intense throat discomfort. A delayed or inaccurate diagnosis can jeopardize the upper aerodigestive tract and be fatal in its evolution. Our objective was to develop a predictive model for the presence of IPA helping in its rapid detection. Patients and methods A 66-month retrospective observational study from 2017 was carried out in a county and tertiary referral hospitals, registering data from all patients diagnosed with PTI and a proportional volume of subjects with pharyngeal symptoms without PTI. Collection of clinical, exploratory and demographic data among participants. Their higher relative risk of PTI presence allowed them to be considered as variables to be tested. Development of a scoring scale for the probability of suffering from it and logistic regression analysis, obtaining the ROC curve with the best diagnostic correlation. Internal validation and estimation of the predictive values of the model. Results On 348 cases of PTI, the assessment scale scored the presence of six variables: trismus (3), unilateral dysphagia-odynophagia (2), velar bulging (2), reflex otalgia (1), pharyngolalia (1) and age between 16 and 46 years (1). With a range of 0-10, a cut-off ≥6 offered a sensitivity of 96.1%, a specificity of 93.9%, and an efficiency of 94.9%. The area under the ROC curve was 0.979. Conclusions The internal validation of this model based on signs and symptoms makes it a very useful tool for early detection of PTI in otorhinolaryngology and primary care (AU)

Review of the allocation criteria for heart transplant in Spain in 2023. SEC-Heart Failure Association/ONT/SECCE consensus document.

Heart transplant (HT) remains the best therapeutic option for patients with advanced heart failure (HF). The allocation criteria aim to guarantee equitable access to HT and prioritize patients with a worse clinical status. To review the HT allocation criteria, the Heart Failure Association of the Spanish Society of Cardiology (HFA-SEC), the Spanish Society of Cardiovascular and Endovascular Surgery (SECCE) and the National Transplant Organization (ONT), organized a consensus conference involving adult and pediatric cardiologists, adult and pediatric cardiac surgeons, transplant coordinators from all over Spain, and physicians and nurses from the ONT. The aims of the consensus conference were as follows: a) to analyze the organization and management of patients with advanced HF and cardiogenic shock in Spain; b) to critically review heart allocation and priority criteria in other transplant organizations; c) to analyze the outcomes of patients listed and transplanted before and after the modification of the heart allocation criteria in 2017; and d) to propose new heart allocation criteria in Spain after an analysis of the available evidence and multidisciplinary discussion. In this article, by the HFA-SEC, SECCE and the ONT we present the results of the analysis performed in the consensus conference and the rationale for the new heart allocation criteria in Spain.

[Comprehensive approach to vertigo: Diagnostic algorithm, causes, treatments, and referral criteria from the perspective of primary care. SEMERGEN consensus document]. / Abordaje integral del vértigo: algoritmo diagnóstico, causas, tratamientos y criterios de derivación desde la perspectiva de atención primaria. Documento de consenso SEMERGEN.

Vertigo is a common symptom that can have various causes and may require a comprehensive approach for its diagnosis and treatment from primary care. A diagnostic algorithm based on the classification proposed by the Otoneurology Commission of the SEORL-PCF is suggested, which facilitates the classification of the different types of vertigo and provides referral criteria for patients from primary care to other specialties. A review of the available treatments based on the underlying cause is conducted for appropriate therapeutic management. This document is expected to become a valuable tool for professionals treating patients with vertigo. The document is based on scientific evidence and on the experience of experts in the field from various medical specialties; and seeks to improve the understanding and clinical approach to acute vertigo from primary care.

[Design of a predictive score table for peritonsillar infection based on signs and symptoms]. / Elaboración de una escala de puntuación predictiva de infección periamigdalina basada en signos y síntomas.

BACKGROUND: Peritonsillar infection (PTI) is a reason for urgent consultation due to intense throat discomfort. A delayed or inaccurate diagnosis can jeopardize the upper aerodigestive tract and be fatal in its evolution. Our objective was to develop a predictive model for the presence of IPA helping in its rapid detection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A 66-month retrospective observational study from 2017 was carried out in a county and tertiary referral hospitals, registering data from all patients diagnosed with PTI and a proportional volume of subjects with pharyngeal symptoms without PTI. Collection of clinical, exploratory and demographic data among participants. Their higher relative risk of PTI presence allowed them to be considered as variables to be tested. Development of a scoring scale for the probability of suffering from it and logistic regression analysis, obtaining the ROC curve with the best diagnostic correlation. Internal validation and estimation of the predictive values of the model. RESULTS: On 348 cases of PTI, the assessment scale scored the presence of six variables: trismus (3), unilateral dysphagia-odynophagia (2), velar bulging (2), reflex otalgia (1), pharyngolalia (1) and age between 16 and 46 years (1). With a range of 0-10, a cut-off ≥6 offered a sensitivity of 96.1%, a specificity of 93.9%, and an efficiency of 94.9%. The area under the ROC curve was 0.979. CONCLUSIONS: The internal validation of this model based on signs and symptoms makes it a very useful tool for early detection of PTI in otorhinolaryngology and primary care.

Formas atípicas de presentación de enfermedad celíaca / Atypical forms of presentation of celiac disease

Introducción: La enfermedad celíaca es una enfermedad de base autoinmune, desencadenada por la ingesta de gluten en individuos con una predisposición genética. Presenta una amplia variabilidad clínica, siendo los síntomas más frecuentes la diarrea, la pérdida de peso y la distensión abdominal. Presentamos tres casos clínicos con diferentes formas de presentación. Casos clínicos. Caso 1 y 2: Dos lactantes de 11 meses, gemelos monocoriales biamnióticos, que acuden a Urgencias por clínica gastrointestinal de forma simultánea. Asocian diarrea con pérdida de peso importante e intolerancia oral completa. Precisan ingreso hospitalario para completar diagnóstico e intervención nutricional. Caso 3: Niño de 4 años que acude a Urgencias por dolor abdominal de inicio brusco con mal estado general, abdomen muy distendido con defensa generalizada. En prueba de imagen se detecta dilatación de asas de intestino delgado y colon. Se mantiene actitud expectante sin precisar intervención quirúrgica. Rehistoriando, refieren episodios de diarrea intermitente con dolor abdominal desde hace 5 meses, lo que permite completar estudio de enfermedad celíaca.(AU)

Introduction: Coeliac disease is an autoimmune-based disease, triggered by the ingestion of gluten in individuals with a genetic predisposition. It presents a wide clinical variability, the most frequent symptoms being diarrhoea, weight loss and abdominal distension. We present three clinical cases with different forms of presentation. Case reports. Case 1 and 2: Two 11-month-old infants, biamniotic monochorionic twins, presented to the Emergency department with simultaneous gastrointestinal symptoms. They had diarrhoea with significant weight loss and complete oral intolerance. They required hospital admission to complete diagnosis and nutritional intervention. Case 3: 4-year-old boy attended the Emergency department for abdominal pain with abrupt onset and poor general condition, very distended abdomen with generalised defence. Imaging tests showed dilated loops of the small intestine and colon. A wait-and-see attitude was maintained without requiring surgical intervention. On re-history, the patient reported episodes of intermittent diarrhoea with abdominal pain for the last 5 months, which led to the completion of the study of coeliac disease.(AU)

Comparación de ambos criterios diagnósticos de malnutrición ESPEN y GLIM en pacientes institucionalizados / Comparison of both ESPEN and GLIM diagnostic criteria for malnutrition in institutionalized patients

Introducción: La malnutrición relacionada con la enfermedad es un problema de alta prevalencia que continúa provocando graves repercusiones clínicas sobre los pacientes institucionalizados. La falta de un acuerdo mundial sobre los criterios de diagnóstico nutricional que deben aplicarse en el entorno clínico compromete la detección y el abordaje nutricional. En este estudio se pretende evaluar el índice de malnutrición en la institución hospitalaria, definir la validez de los criterios GLIM y ESPEN y determinar el criterio de referencia para el diagnóstico nutricional en la práctica clínica. Metodología: Estudio transversal, descriptivo desarrollado en un hospital de larga estancia en una muestra de 314 pacientes. Se analizó el diagnóstico nutricional mediante los criterios ESPEN y GLIM. Se evaluó la sensibilidad, especificidad y concordancia entre ambos criterios para determinar la validez de su uso en la práctica clínica. Resultados: La prevalencia de malnutrición fue del 58% según ESPEN y 78% en base a GLIM, siendo severa en el 24% de los pacientes y moderada en el 76%. La concordancia entre ESPEN y GLIM fue moderada (I. kappa: 0,325). Los criterios GLIM mostraron una sensibilidad buena (93,75%) y una especificad deficiente (38,32%). Por el contrario, los criterios ESPEN definieron una sensibilidad regular (61,4%) y una buena especificidad (85,4%). Conclusiones: Ambos criterios diagnósticos ESPEN y GLIM serían adecuados para la evaluación del diagnóstico nutricional en la práctica clínica. Sin embargo, los criterios GLIM resultan de mayor validez al identificar precozmente individuos en proceso de malnutrición. (AU)

Introduction: Disease-related malnutrition is a problem of high prevalence that continues to cause serious clinical repercussions on institutionalized patients. The lack of global agreement on the nutritional diagnostic criteria to be applied in the clinical setting compromises the detection and nutritional approach. This study intends to evaluate the malnutrition index in the hospital institution, define the validity of the GLIM and ESPEN criteria and determine the reference criterion for nutritional diagnosis in clinical practice. Methods: Cross-sectional, descriptive study conducted in a long-stay hospital in a sample of 314 patients. Nutritional diagnosis was analyzed using ESPEN and GLIM criteria. The sensitivity, specificity and concordance between both criteria were evaluated to determine the validity of their use in clinical practice. Key results: The prevalence of malnutrition was 58% according to ESPEN and 78% based on GLIM, being severe in 24% of patients and moderate in 76%. The agreement between ESPEN and GLIM was moderate (I. kappa: 0.325). The GLIM criteria showed good sensitivity (93.75%) and poor specificity (38.32%). In contrast, the ESPEN criteria defined regular sensitivity (61.4%) and good specificity (85.4%). Conclusions: Both ESPEN and GLIM diagnostic criteria would be suitable for the evaluation of nutritional diagnosis in clinical practice. However, the GLIM criteria are more valid when identifying individuals in the process of malnutrition early. (AU)

Recommendations and quality criteria to improve the early diagnosis of primary biliary cholangitis. / Recomendaciones y criterios de calidad para mejorar el diagnóstico precoz de la colangitis biliar primaria.

OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to establish recommendations and quality criteria to enhance the healthcare process of PBC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: It was conducted using qualitative techniques, preceded by a literature review. A consensus conference involving five specialists in the field was held, followed by a Delphi process developed in two waves, in which 30 specialist physicians in family and community medicine, digestive system and internal medicine were invited to participate. RESULTS: Seven recommendations and 15 sets of quality criteria, indicators and standards were obtained. Those with the highest consensus were «Know the impact on the patient's quality of life. Consider their point of view and agree on recommendations and care¼ and «Evaluate possible fibrosis at the time of diagnosis and during PBC follow-up, assessing the evolution of factors associated with poor disease prognosis: noninvasive fibrosis (elastography > 2.1 kPa/year), GGT, ALP and bilirubin annually¼, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of the consensus recommendations and criteria would provide better patient care. The need for multidisciplinary follow-up and an increased role of primary care is emphasized.

Sustainability disclosure in the Ecuadorian banking sector: channels used, determining factors and type of information revealed

This study aimed to provide evidence on sustainability disclosure in the banking sector of Ecuador Using a descriptive-correlational approach, three key areas were examined: the most common reports for the disclosure of sustainability information, factors influencing banks' willingness to disclose, and the type of sustainability information being disclosed. Fisher's test and mean difference tests were employed to identify factors influencing banks' willingness to disclose sustainability information. Additionally, a content analysis was conducted to identify the main themes disclosed by banks regarding sustainability An index incorporating environmental, social, economic, and governance aspects was utilized for this analysis. The findings revealed low levels of disclosure, a higher prevalence of specialized reports, a positive association between willingness to disclose and organizational visibility, and a predominance of social dimension disclosure practices. These findings underscore the need to enhance disclosure standards and strengthen communication with stakeholders in Ecuador's banking sector. JEL CLASSIFICATION MI0, MI4; G2I

Este estudio buscó proporcionar evidencia sobre la divulgación de sostenibilidad en el sector bancario de Ecuador Mediante un enfoque descriptivo-correlacional se abordaron tres temáticas: los medios más utilizados para divulgar información de sostenibilidad, los factores que influyen en la disposición de los bancos a divulgar y el tipo de información sobre sostenibilidad que divulgan. Se utilizaron las pruebas de Fisher y de diferencia de medias para identificar los factores que influyen en la disposición de los bancos a divulgar información de sostenibilidad. De igual forma, se realizó un análisis de contenido para identificar los temas principales que divulgan los bancos sobre sostenibilidad. Para ello, se usó un índice que identificó aspectos ambientales, sociales, económicos y de gobernanza. Los resultados revelaron niveles bajos de divulgación, un mayor uso de informes especializados, una asociación positiva entre la disposición a divulgar y la visibilidad de la organización, y una predominancia de la divulgación de prácticas en la dimensión social. Estos hallazgos resaltan la necesidad de mejorar los estándares de divulgación y fortalecer la comunicación con los grupos de interés en el sector bancario de Ecuador. CLASIFICACIÓN JEL M10, M14; G21

Este estudo buscou fornecer evidências sobre a divulgação da sustentabilidade no setor bancário do Ecuador. Usando uma abordagem descritiva-correlacional, foram abordadas três questões: os meios mais comuns usados para divulgar informações sobre sustentabilidade, os fatores que influenciam a disposição dos bancos em divulgar e o tipo de informações sobre sustentabilidade que eles divulgam. O teste de Fisher e os testes de diferença de médias foram usados para identificar os fatores que influenciam a disposição dos bancos em divulgar informações sobre sustentabilidade. Da mesma forma, foi realizada uma análise de conteúdo para identificar os principais tópicos que os bancos divulgam sobre sustentabilidade. Isso foi feito por meio de um índice que identificou questões ambientais, sociais, econômicas e de governança. Os resultados revelaram baixos níveis de divulgação, um maior uso de relatórios especializados, uma associação positiva entre a disposição de divulgar e a visibilidade organizacional, e uma predominância de divulgação de práticas na dimensão social. Essas conclusões destacam a necessidade de melhorar os padrões de divulgação e fortalecer a comunicação com as partes interessadas no setor bancário do Ecuador. CLASSIFICAÇÃO JEL M10, M14; G21

Resultados del aislamiento eléctrico de las venas pulmonares en pacientes menores y mayores de 70 años / Outcomes of pulmonary vein electrical isolation in patients younger than and older than 70 years

Resumen Introducción y objetivos: Comparar las características clínicas y los resultados de cohortes contemporáneas de pacientes menores y mayores de 70 años que han sido sometidos a ablación de fibrilación auricular (FA) mediante catéter. Métodos: Se llevó a cabo un estudio de cohortes retrospectivo en pacientes sometidos a ablación con catéter debido a la presencia de FA refractaria. Se realizó un seguimiento mínimo de 12 meses por paciente. Resultados: En el estudio se incluyeron un total de 239 pacientes sometidos a ablación de FA, de los cuales 171 (71,5%) pertenecían al grupo de edad < 70 años y 68 (28,5%) al grupo de edad > 70 años. La edad promedio de la población estudiada fue de 62,4 años (desviación estándar [DE] = 10,87). El grupo < 70 años presentó una edad promedio de 58,03 años (DE = 9,71), mientras que el grupo > 70 años tuvo una edad promedio de 73,4 años (DE = 3,05). Además, se observó una mayor prevalencia de FA paroxística en el grupo de pacientes menores de 70 años, mientras que en el grupo de pacientes mayores de 70 años se encontró una mayor prevalencia de FA persistente. Estas diferencias fueron estadísticamente significativas en ambos casos. Las tasas de recurrencia después del primer procedimiento de ablación fueron similares entre los dos grupos (21,43% en el grupo menor de 70 años frente a 23,53% en el grupo mayor de 70 años, p = 0,79). No se encontraron diferencias significativas en cuanto a complicaciones. El grupo menor de 70 años experimentó 18 complicaciones, mientras que el grupo mayor de 70 años tuvo 5 complicaciones, con un valor de p de 0,472. Conclusión: Los pacientes mayores de 70 años sometidos al primer procedimiento de ablación de FA por catéter presentan resultados clínicos similares a los pacientes menores de 70 años.

Abstract Introduction and objectives: The objective of this study is to compare the clinical characteristics and outcomes of contemporary cohorts of patients undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF), stratified by age (< 70 years and ≥ 70 years). Methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent catheter ablation for refractory AF. The minimum follow-up duration per patient was 12 months. Results: A total of 239 patients were included in the study, with 171 (71.5%) in the < 70 years group and 68 (28.5%) in the ≥ 70 years group. The mean age of the study population was 62.4 years (SD 10.87). The < 70 years group had a mean age of 58.03 years (SD 9.71), while the ≥ 70 years group had a mean age of 73.4 years (SD 3.05). Furthermore, a higher proportion of paroxysmal AF was observed in patients < 70 years, whereas a higher proportion of persistent AF was found in patients ≥ 70 years. These differences were statistically significant. The recurrence rates after the initial ablation procedure were similar between the two groups (21.43% in the < 70 years group vs. 23.53% in the ≥ 70 years group, p = 0.79). Additionally, there were no significant differences in terms of complications. The < 70 years group experienced 18 complications, while the ≥ 70 years group had 5 complications (p = 0.472). Conclusion: The findings of this study suggest that patients aged 70 years and older who undergo their first catheter ablation procedure for AF demonstrate similar clinical outcomes compared to patients younger than 70 years.

Cefalea atribuida a ictus isquémico. Actualización semiológica y diagnóstica / Headache attributed to ischaemic stroke. An update on its semiology and diagnosis

Introducción: La cefalea es un síntoma frecuente tras el ictus isquémico agudo. Su identificación y diagnóstico constituyen un reto por el perfil de paciente y los criterios diagnósticos actuales de esta entidad. Los objetivos del estudio fueron determinar la prevalencia de cefalea atribuida a ictus isquémico y su forma persistente, y analizar las variables clinicodemográficas y el grado de cumplimiento de los criterios de la Clasificación Internacional de Cefaleas (ICHD-III). Pacientes y métodos: Es un estudio observacional analítico de cohortes prospectivo de pacientes ingresados con ictus isquémico agudo en la unidad de ictus de un hospital de tercer nivel en un período de 12 meses. Resultados: Se incluyó a 244 pacientes con ictus isquémico agudo (el 59,8%, varones; edad media: 71 ± 12,8 años). El 23,2% presentó cefalea en el momento del ingreso o bien en las primeras 72 horas y el 12,5% de ellos presentó cefalea persistente atribuida a ictus isquémico. El 62,5% cumplió los criterios diagnósticos de acuerdo con la ICHD-III. Conclusión: La cefalea tras el ictus isquémico es un síntoma frecuente. Su aparición se asoció al sexo femenino, al ictus de territorio vertebrobasilar y a puntuaciones bajas en la National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale. Sería recomendable revisar los criterios diagnósticos actuales.(AU)

Introduction: Headache is a common symptom in acute ischemic stroke which is often overlooked and undertreated because of focus in neurologic function, communication difficulties in stroke patients and the current diagnostic criteria of this type of headache. The present study aimed to determine the prevalence of Acute and Persistent Headache Attributed to Ischemic Stroke and to analyze the fulfillment of the criteria of the International Classification of Headaches (ICHD-IID). Patients and methods: Prospective observational analytical cohort study. The study population consisted of patients with acute ischemic stroke admitted to the Stroke Unit of a tertiary care hospital over a period of 12 months. Results: Two hundred and forty-four patients with acute ischemic stroke (59.8% males, mean age 71+12.8 years) were included. Headache at onset or at the first 72 hours was present in 23.2% and 12.5% of them presented persistent headache attributed to ischemic stroke. Only 62.5% of the headaches at stroke onset fulfilled the diagnostic criteria of ICHD-III. Conclusion: Headache after ischemic stroke is a common symptom. It was associated with female sex, posterior circulation stroke and low scores on the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS). The current diagnostic criteria should be reviewed.

Tumor fibroso pleural ¿son realmente benignos? ¿Cuándo deben operarse? / Pleural fibrous tumor, are they really benign? When should they have operation?

El tumor fibroso pleural es un tumor habitualmente asintomático, benigno y de lento crecimiento, que en un pequeño porcentaje de los casos tiene un comportamiento más agresivo. Para definir los criterios de malignidad es necesario un análisis inmunohistoquímico. El tratamiento de elección es la resección quirúrgica completa con márgenes de seguridad ya sea por toracotomía o por videotoracoscopia en función del tamaño. Se encuentra en estudio la utilización de terapia adyuvante radioterápica o quimioterápica que en el momento actual no cuenta con resultados significativos. Presentamos dos casos que fueron tratados de forma quirúrgica, con extirpación completa siendo el primero definido como maligno según los criterios histológicos y el segundo benigno, pero de alto riesgo. Solo uno de ellos recibió terapia adyuvante. (AU)

Solitary fibrous pleural tumor is a usually asymptomatic, benign and slow-growing tumor, which in a small percentage of cases has a more aggressive behavior. To define the malignancy criteria, an immunohistochemical analysis is necessary. The gold standard treatment is a complete surgical resection with safety margins either by thoracotomy or by videothoracoscopy depending on the size. The use of radiotherapy or chemotherapy as an adjuvant therapy is under study, which at the present time does not have significant results. We present two cases that were treated surgically, with complete removal, one being classified as malignant according to histological criteria and the other benign but high risk. Only one of them received adjuvant therapy. (AU)

Versión en español de los criterios STOPP/START 3. Avances en la detección de la prescripción inapropiada de medicamentos en personas mayores / Spanish version of the STOPP/START 3 criteria: Advances in the detection of inappropriate prescribing medication in the older people

Los criterios STOPP/START son criterios explícitos basados en sistemas fisiológicos que resumen la evidencia sobre problemas de prescripción relevantes clínicamente relacionados con el uso de medicamentos potencialmente inapropiados (criterios STOPP) y con potenciales omisiones de prescripción (criterios START). Las dos versiones anteriores de los criterios STOPP/START se publicaron en 2008 y en 2015, y sus versiones en español, en 2009 y en 2015. En 2023 se acaba de publicar la versión3 de dichos criterios. El objetivo de este artículo es presentar la versión traducida al español, así como revisar la utilización y el impacto que ha tenido la versión2 del año 2015 en nuestro idioma. Se realizó una traducción del inglés al español por profesionales expertos y con alto nivel de inglés de la versión3 de los criterios STOPP/START, que incorporan la evidencia publicada desde abril de 2014 hasta marzo de 2022. Además, se hizo una revisión sistemática de las publicaciones que han usado la traducción española de la versión previa (versión2 de 2015) de los criterios STOPP/START. La nueva versión, presentada en este artículo, cuenta con 190 criterios STOPP/START (133 criterios STOPP y 57 criterios START), lo que supone un aumento del 40% en el número de criterios en comparación con la versión anterior. En la revisión se encontraron 37 estudios (21 observacionales, 11 de intervención y 5 de otro tipo) que han usado la versión española en lugar de la internacional. La versión3 en español de los criterios STOPP/START es una lista explícita actualizada de medicamentos potencialmente inapropiados y posibles omisiones en la prescripción que tienen el objetivo de optimizar la medicación y minimizar las reacciones adversas a los medicamentos durante la revisión de la medicación en las personas mayores, en particular aquellas con multimorbilidad y polifarmacia (AU)

The STOPP/START criteria are explicit physiologic systems-based criteria that summarize evidence on clinically relevant prescribing problems related to the use of potentially inappropriate medications (STOPP criteria) and potential prescribing omissions (START criteria). The two previous versions of the STOPP/START criteria were published in 2008 and 2015, and their Spanish versions in 2009 and 2015. Version3 of these criteria has just been published in 2023. The aim of this article is to present the Spanish translated version, and to review the use and impact that version2 of 2015 has had in our language. A translation from English to Spanish was performed by expert professionals with a high level of English of version3 of the STOPP/START criteria, which incorporates the evidence published from April 2014 to March 2022. In addition, a systematic review of publications that have used the Spanish translation of the previous version (version2 of 2015) of the STOPP/START criteria was performed. The new version, presented in this article, has 190 STOPP/START criteria (133 STOPP criteria and 57 START criteria), which is a 40% increase in the number of criteria compared to the previous version. The review found 37 studies (21 observational, 11 interventional and 5 other) that used the Spanish version instead of the international version. The Spanish version 3 of the STOPP/START criteria is an updated explicit list of potentially inappropriate medications and possible omissions in prescribing that aims to optimize medication and minimize adverse drug reactions during medication review in the elderly, particularly those with multimorbidity and polypharmacy (AU)