[Chances of vaginal delivery with induction in severe preterm SGA fetus: An observational study]. / Chances d'accouchement par voie basse chez les fœtus PAG sévère déclenchés avant terme : une étude observationnelle.

OBJECTIVE: If a small for gestational age (SGA) foetus needs to be delivered because of severity (<3rd centile) attempting induction of labor theoretically increases the risk of caesarean section and neonatal acidosis, but these risks are poorly understood. This article aims to assess the risk of caesarean section and neonatal acidosis in attempted vaginal birth of a moderately preterm foetus in the setting of severe SGA. METHOD: A single-centre hospital-based observational study conducted over a period of 17 consecutive years in mothers with a single foetus in cephalic presentation with severe SGA (<3rd centile) needing foetal extraction. Neonatal acidosis was considered moderate if pH<7.10 and severe if pH<7.0. The degree of severity of SGA was estimated according to the birth weight ratio. RESULTS: Four hundred and thirty-four foetuses with severe SGA were included during the period, 140 of whom were born after induction (32.3%). In this group, 66.4% of women achieved a vaginal birth (66.4%; 95% CI [58.0-74.2]) and the risk of moderate or severe acidosis was doubled compared with the group of foetuses who had undergone a planned caesarean section (7.9% vs. 3.1%, OR=2.7 [1.1-6.7]). Neither gestational age nor the degree of growth restriction was significantly related to the risk of caesarean section or to the risk of moderate or severe neonatal acidosis. CONCLUSION: In cases of severe SGA before 37weeks' gestation, induction of labour allows vaginal delivery in two-thirds of cases. It is accompanied by a doubling of the risk of moderate or severe neonatal acidosis.

[Prostaglandins or cervical balloon for the induction of labor for cervical ripening: A literature review]. / Méthodes pharmacologiques ou mécaniques pour la maturation cervicale : une revue de la littérature.

OBJECTIVE: Induction of labor in France concerns one birth out of four with 70% of induction starting by cervical ripening, either with a pharmacological (prostaglandins) or a mechanical (balloon) method. This review aims to compare these two methods within current knowledge, using the PRISMA methodology. METHODS: Trials comparing these two methods, published or unpublished up to July 2023, in French or English were searched for in the PubMed, Cochrane Library and ClinicalTrial.govs datasets. Fifty articles including 10,689 women were selected. The outcomes of interest were those from the Core Outcome Set for trails on Induction of Labour (COSIOL) list: mode of delivery, time from induction-to-birth, maternal and neonatal morbidity, and maternal satisfaction. RESULT: No differences were observed between the two methods for the mode of delivery or neonatal and maternal morbidity. The time from induction-to-birth was longer for mechanical methods. Those were also associated with a greater need for oxytocin, less uterine hyperstimulation and less instrumental deliveries. Maternal satisfaction was assessed in only nine trials using various scales which made the interpretation of maternal satisfaction. CONCLUSION: The efficacy of these two induction methods is similar for vaginal delivery, but it remains to be seen which one best meets women's satisfaction criteria.

[Comparison of vaginal prostaglandins with oral misoprostol as a second line of cervical ripening after using a cervical balloon catheter]. / Comparaison des prostaglandines vaginales au misoprostol oral en 2e ligne de maturation cervicale après recours à un ballonnet de dilatation cervicale.

OBJECTIVE: To compare vaginal prostaglandins with oral misoprostol as a second line of cervical ripening after using a cervical balloon catheter. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a retrospective monocentric study (Lille, France), according to a "before"/"after" design. The inclusion criteria were a singleton pregnancy, with a fetus in cephalic presentation, a term >37 WA, with a cervix having a Bishop score lower than 6 after a first line of maturation by cervical balloon catheter. Two groups were formed: "before" corresponding to the continuation of maturation by vaginal prostaglandins, from March 2019 to November 2019, and "after": corresponding to the continuation of maturation by oral misoprostol, from June 2020 to December 2020. The primary outcome was vaginal delivery rate. RESULTS: One hundred women were included in each group. The rate of vaginal delivery was similar between the 2 groups (76% vs 81%, p=0.39), as were the times between the start of induction and the birth and between the start of induction and the transition to birth room. There was no difference in the indication for caesarean section, with in particular an identical rate of caesarean sections for induction failure (p=0.52). Subgroup analysis in obese women showed a significantly higher rate of vaginal delivery in the "after" group (OR=4.17;95% CI [1.02;17.07]). CONCLUSION: The vaginal delivery rate is similar when using vaginal prostaglandins or oral misoprostol as second line cervical ripening after use of a cervical balloon catheter.

[Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: French College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists guidelines for clinical practice]. / La cholestase gravidique : recommandations pour la pratique clinique du Collège national des gynécologues obstétriciens français.

OBJECTIVE: To identify strategies for reducing neonatal and maternal morbidity associated with intrahepatic cholestasis pregnancy (ICP). MATERIAL AND METHODS: The quality of evidence of the literature was assessed following the GRADE methodology with questions formulated in the PICO format (Patients, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) and outcomes defined a priori and classified according to their importance. An extensive bibliographic search was performed on PubMed, Cochrane, EMBASE and Google Scholar databases. The quality of the evidence was assessed (high, moderate, low, very low) and a (i) strong or (ii) weak recommendations or (iii) no recommendation were formulated. The recommendations were reviewed in two rounds with external reviewers (Delphi survey) to select the consensus recommendations. RESULTS: Of the 14 questions (from 12 PICO questions and one definition question outside the PICO format), there was agreement between the working group and the external reviewers on 14 (100%). The level of evidence of the literature was insufficient to provide a recommendation on two questions. ICP is defined by the occurrence of suggestive pruritus (palmoplantar, nocturnal) associated with a total bile acid level>10µmol/L or an alanine transaminase level above 2N after ruling out differential diagnoses. In the absence of suggestive symptoms of a differential diagnosis, it is recommended not to carry out additional biological or ultrasound tests. In women with CIP, ursodeoxycholic acid is recommended to reduce the intensity of maternal pruritus (Strong recommendation. Quality of the evidence moderate) and to decrease the level of total bile acids and alanine transaminases. (Strong recommendation. Quality of the evidence moderate). S-adenosyl-methionine, dexamethasone, guar gum or activated charcoal should not be used to reduce the intensity of maternal pruritus (Strong recommendation. Quality of evidence low), and there is insufficient data to recommend the use of antihistamines (No recommendation. Quality of evidence low). Rifampicin (Weak recommendation. Very low quality of evidence) or plasma exchange (Strong recommendation. Very low quality of evidence) should not be used to reduce maternal pruritus and perinatal morbidity. Serum monitoring of bile acids is recommended to reduce perinatal morbidity and mortality (stillbirth, prematurity) (Low recommendation. Quality of the evidence low). The level of evidence is insufficient to determine whether fetal heart rate or fetal ultrasound monitoring are useful to reduce perinatal morbidity (No recommendation). Birth is recommended when bile acid level is above 99µmol/L from 36 weeks gestation to reduce perinatal morbidity, in particular stillbirth. When bile acid level is above 99µmol/L is below 100µmol/L, women should be informed that induction of labor could be considered 37 and 39 weeks gestation to reduce perinatal morbidity. (Strong recommendation. Quality of evidence low). In postpartum, total bile acids and alanine transaminases level should be checked and normalized before prescribing estrogen-progestin contraception, ideally with a low estrogen dose (risk of recurrence of pruritus and cytolysis) (Low recommendation. Quality of evidence very low). CONCLUSION: Although the quality of evidence regarding ICP gestational cholestasis remains low, there is a strong consensus in France, as shown by our Delphi study, on how to manage women with ICP. The reference first-line treatment is ursodeoxycholic acid.

[Uterine rupture during medical termination of pregnancy or intrauterine death: A risk management study]. / Rupture utérine sur interruption médicale de grossesse ou mort fœtale in utero : une étude de gestion du risque.

OBJECTIVE: To describe and analyze a series of uterine ruptures (UR) that occurred in the context of medical termination of pregnancy (MTP) or intrauterine death (IUD) from a risk management perspective. METHODS: French retrospective descriptive observational study of all cases of UR occurring during induction for IUD or MTP, reported between 2011 and 2021 by Gynerisq. Cases were recorded on a basis of voluntary reports using targeted questionnaires. RESULTS: Between November 27, 2011, and August 22, 2021, 12 cases of UR occurring during an induction for IUD or MTP were recorded. 50 % of the patients had never given birth by cesarean section. The term of delivery varied from 17+3 days to 41+2 days. The clinical signs found were pain (n=6), ascending fetal presentation (n=5) and bleeding (n=4). All patients were managed by laparotomy, 5 were transfused. One vascular ligation and one hysterectomy were required. CONCLUSION: Knowledge of surgical history is involved in the prevention of UR. The signs of detection are pain, ascending presentation and bleeding. The speed of management and good teamwork allow a reduction of maternal complications. The findings of the morbidity and mortality reviews show that prevention and mitigation barriers can be established.

Directive clinique no 432a : Maturation cervicale et déclenchement artificiel du travail - Information générale.

OBJECTIF: Présenter des données probantes et des recommandations sur la maturation cervicale et le déclenchement artificiel du travail. Fournir de l'information aux professionnels accoucheurs et aux personnes enceintes sur les soins périnataux optimaux et la prévention des interventions obstétricales inutiles. POPULATION CIBLE: Toutes les patientes enceintes. BéNéFICES, RISQUES ET COûTS: La mise en application interprofessionnelle et cohérente de la présente directive, l'équipement adéquat et le personnel compétent améliorent la sécurité des soins per partum. Les personnes enceintes et leurs personnes de soutien doivent être informées des risques et bénéfices du déclenchement artificiel du travail. DONNéES PROBANTES: La littérature publiée jusqu'en mars 2022 a été passée en revue. Une recherche a été effectuée dans les bases de données PubMed, CINAHL et Cochrane Library pour répertorier des revues systématiques, des essais cliniques randomisés et des études observationnelles sur la maturation cervicale et le déclenchement artificiel du travail. La littérature grise (non publiée) a été obtenue à l'aide de recherches menées dans des sites Web d'organismes s'intéressant à l'évaluation des technologies dans le domaine de la santé et d'organismes connexes, dans des collections de directives cliniques, des registres d'essais cliniques et des sites Web de sociétés de spécialité médicale nationales et internationales. MéTHODES DE VALIDATION: Les auteurs ont évalué la qualité des données probantes et la force des recommandations en utilisant le cadre méthodologique GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation). Voir l'annexe A en ligne (tableau A1 pour les définitions et tableau A2 pour l'interprétation des recommandations fortes et conditionnelles [faibles]). PROFESSIONNELS CONCERNéS: Tous les fournisseurs de soins obstétricaux.

Directive clinique no 432b : Maturation cervicale.

OBJECTIF: Présenter des données probantes et des recommandations sur la maturation cervicale et le déclenchement artificiel du travail. Fournir de l'information aux professionnels accoucheurs et aux personnes enceintes sur les soins périnataux optimaux et la prévention des interventions obstétricales inutiles. POPULATION CIBLE: Toutes les patientes enceintes. BéNéFICES, RISQUES ET COûTS: La mise en application interprofessionnelle et cohérente de la présente directive, l'équipement adéquat et le personnel compétent améliorent la sécurité des soins per partum. Les personnes enceintes et leurs personnes de soutien doivent être informées des risques et bénéfices du déclenchement artificiel du travail. DONNéES PROBANTES: La littérature publiée jusqu'en mars 2022 a été passée en revue. Une recherche a été effectuée dans les bases de données PubMed, CINAHL et Cochrane Library pour répertorier des revues systématiques, des essais cliniques randomisés et des études observationnelles sur la maturation cervicale et le déclenchement artificiel du travail. La littérature grise (non publiée) a été obtenue à l'aide de recherches menées dans des sites Web d'organismes s'intéressant à l'évaluation des technologies dans le domaine de la santé et d'organismes connexes, dans des collections de directives cliniques, des registres d'essais cliniques et des sites Web de sociétés de spécialité médicale nationales et internationales. MéTHODES DE VALIDATION: Les auteurs ont évalué la qualité des données probantes et la force des recommandations en utilisant le cadre méthodologique GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation). Voir l'annexe A en ligne (tableau A1 pour les définitions et tableau A2 pour l'interprétation des recommandations fortes et conditionnelles [faibles]). PROFESSIONNELS CONCERNéS: Tous les fournisseurs de soins obstétricaux.

Directive clinique no 432c : Déclenchement artificiel du travail.

OBJECTIFS: Présenter des données probantes et des recommandations sur la maturation cervicale et le déclenchement artificiel du travail. Fournir de l'information aux professionnels accoucheurs et aux personnes enceintes sur les soins périnataux optimaux et la prévention des interventions obstétricales inutiles. POPULATION CIBLE: Toutes les patientes enceintes. BéNéFICES, RISQUES ET COûTS: La mise en application interprofessionnelle et cohérente de la présente directive, l'équipement adéquat et le personnel compétent améliorent la sécurité des soins per partum. Les personnes enceintes et leurs personnes de soutien doivent être informées des risques et bénéfices du déclenchement artificiel du travail. DONNéES PROBANTES: La littérature publiée jusqu'en mars 2022 a été passée en revue. Une recherche a été effectuée dans les bases de données PubMed, CINAHL et Cochrane Library pour répertorier des revues systématiques, des essais cliniques randomisés et des études observationnelles sur la maturation cervicale et le déclenchement artificiel du travail. La littérature grise (non publiée) a été obtenue à l'aide de recherches menées dans des sites Web d'organismes s'intéressant à l'évaluation des technologies dans le domaine de la santé et d'organismes connexes, dans des collections de directives cliniques, des registres d'essais cliniques et des sites Web de sociétés de spécialité médicale nationales et internationales. MéTHODES DE VALIDATION: Les auteurs ont évalué la qualité des données probantes et la force des recommandations en utilisant le cadre méthodologique GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation). Voir l'annexe A en ligne (tableau A1 pour les définitions et tableau A2 pour l'interprétation des recommandations fortes et conditionnelles [faibles]). PROFESSIONNELS CONCERNéS: Tous les fournisseurs de soins obstétricaux. DÉCLARATIONS SOMMAIRESMISOPROSTOL: OCYTOCINE: RECOMMANDATIONS.

[Induction of labour with oral misoprostol versus vaginal misoprostol: A before-after study]. / Induction du travail par misoprostol oral versus misoprostol vaginal : étude avant-après.

OBJECTIVE: The rate of induction of labor represented 22 % of deliveries in 2016 in France. Oral misoprostol (Angusta®) was marketed in France in the last quarter of 2018. The objective of our study was to compare the efficacy and safety of induction of labor with oral misoprostol compared to vaginal misoprostol in women with an unripe cervix. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We carried out a retrospective study before and after the implementation of oral misoprostol including all women with an unripe cervix who benefited from an induction of labor with a viable infant in vertex presentation, without uterine scar. During the first two-year period, women received 50µg of misoprostol in the posterior fornix, repeated 6hours later if needed. If labor had not started after 24hours, women received another dose of 50µg, which was repeated every 4hours until labor was established, up to a total dose of 150µg. During the second two-year period, women received two tablets of oral misoprostol 25µg every four hours if necessary, up to a total dose of 200µg. The primary endpoints were mode of delivery and neonatal safety. RESULTS: During the two study periods, 1199 women received vaginal misoprostol and 1199 women received oral misoprostol including. The cesarean delivery rate was 21.8% during the first period and 21,3% during the second period (P=0.83). A 5-minutes Apgar score<7 was observed in 23 (1.9%) and 14 (1.2%) newborns in the vaginal misoprostol and oral misoprostol groups (P=0.14), respectively. An arterial cord pH<7.00 was observed in 6 (0.5%) and 7 (0.6%) newborns (P=0.99), respectively. CONCLUSION: Oral misoprostol administered at the dose of 50µg every 4hours (up to a total dose of 200µg) is as effective and safe as the vaginal misoprostol to induce labor in women with an unripe cervix.

[Efficacy and safety of oral misoprostol 25µg vs. vaginal dinoprostone in induction of labor at term]. / Efficacité et tolérance du misoprostol oral 25µg vs dinoprostone vaginale dans le déclenchement du travail à terme.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of oral misoprostol 25µg compared to vaginal dinoprostone in the induction of labor at term. METHODS: Analytic, retrospective study of patients induced at term by prostaglandins with an unfavorable cervix, over two consecutive periods from 01/01/2019 to 19/02/2020 and from 20/02/2020 to 07/04/2021, within a regional level III university hospital center. We compared the safety and the efficacy between the oral misoprostol Angusta® used since 20/02/2020 and the vaginal dinoprostone previously used in gel or diffuser. The primary endpoint was the rate of vaginal deliveries within 24h. Secondary endpoints were cesarean section rate, indications for cesarean section, uterine contractility abnormalities and neonatal outcomes. RESULTS: Our study found no difference in terms of efficacy with similar rates of vaginal deliveries within 24h (51.88% vs. 51.25%; P=0.87) and caesarean sections (misoprostol group: 19.42% vs. dinoprostone group: 16.62%; P=0.33). However, the tolerance criteria revealed in the dinoprostone group an increase in tachysystole (misoprostol group: 9.28% vs. dinoprostone group: 16.90%; P=0.003) and acidosis (arterial pH<7.10, misoprostol group: 3.83% vs. dinoprostone group: 9.29%; P=0.006). CONCLUSION: No difference in efficacy was found between the two induction techniques. Oral misoprostol 25µg seems to be better tolerated from a maternal and fetal point of view.

Desencadeamento na neurose e sua relação com o sinthoma e a função do analista no contexto da clínica na atualidade / The concept of triggering in neurosis and its relationship with sinthome and the role of the psychoanalyst in the context of current clinical psychology / Le concept de déclenchement dans la névrose et son rapport avec le sinthome et le rôle du psychanalyste dans le contexte de la psychologie clinique actuelle) / El concepto de desencadenamiento en la neurosis y su relación con el sinthome y el papel del psicoanalista en el contexto de la psicología clínica actual)

Este trabalho aborda a noção de desencadeamento nas neuroses, considerando a clínica atual e, para isto, perpassa pela noção de encadeamento e desencadeamento considerando ensinamentos freudiano e lacaniano. Formalizações sobre sinthoma, como elemento que repara os erros do enlaçamento e índice de encadeamento, e sintoma, são convocadas para a conversa em que a neurose, mesmo no contexto da clínica, apresenta-se frequentemente em sua forma não desencadeada. A função do analista como perturbador da defesa e do sinthoma é, assim, questão que se coloca em cena.

This article addresses the concept of triggering in neurosis by taking into account current clinical psychology and based on the concepts of chaining and triggering, according to Freudian and Lacanian teachings. Formalizations about the sinthome as an element that repairs bonding mistakes and the chaining index, and the sinthome itself, are convened for a conversation in which neurosis, even in the context of clinical psychology, often presents itself in its non-triggered form. The role of the psychoanalyst as a disrupter of both defense and the sinthome is therefore a question that arises in this scenario.

Cette étude examine la notion de déclenchement dans la névrose en prenant pour base la psychologie clinique actuelle ainsi que les concepts de chaînage et de déclenchement selon les enseignements freudiens et lacaniens. Les formalisations sur le sinthome, en tant qu'élément qui répare les erreurs de liaison et de l'index de chaînage, ainsi que le sinthome, sont convoqués à la conversation dans laquelle la névrose, même dans le contexte de la psychologie clinique, se présente souvent sous sa forme non-déclenchée. Le rôle du psychanalyste en tant que perturbateur de la défense et du sinthome représente donc une question qui se met en évidence.

Este trabajo aborda el concepto de desencadenamiento en las neurosis, considerando la práctica clínica actual y, para ello, transita por los conceptos de encadenamiento y desencadenamiento, basándose en las enseñanzas freudianas y lacanianas. Las formalizaciones sobre el sinthome, como un elemento que repara los errores de cruce y el índice de encadenamiento, y el síntoma en sí, son convocados a la charla en la que la neurosis, incluso en el contexto de la práctica clínica, se presenta a menudo en su forma no desencadenada. El papel del psicoanalista como perturbador, tanto de la defensa como del sinthome es, por lo tanto, una cuestión que surge en la escena.

[Impact of the healthcare pathway on the rate of obstetrical interventions in small for gestational age fetuses (IATROPAG Study)]. / Impact du parcours de soins sur le taux d'interventions obstétricales dans la prise en charge des fœtus petit pour l'âge gestationnel (Étude IATROPAG).

BACKGROUND: While previous studies have demonstrated an improvement in implementation of clinical practices and an improved neonatal prognosis when growth restricted fetuses were followed within a standardized healthcare pathway, the objective of this study was to assess the prevalence of obstetric interventions in small-for-gestational-age (SGA) fetuses followed within a standardized care pathway compared to a traditional care pathway. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study between 2015 and 2017, in a type III maternity hospital in Lyon, in a population of SGA fetuses, considered as such in case of antenatal diagnosis of fetal weight<10th percentile but>3rd centile without umbilical Doppler abnormality during antenatal surveillance and without ultrasound argument suggesting intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR). We collected the gestational age at diagnosis, obstetrical events and prevention of preterm delivery (antenatal corticosteroids), gestation age at birth, the method of delivery (spontaneous or induced), indication of induction, the method of birth (spontaneous, instrumental extraction or caesarean section), and the immediate neonatal outcome including cord pH, Apgar score at 5minutes, birth weight and fetal sex. After diagnosis, the choice of the pathway was left to the practitioner depending on their habit, their ability to manage the follow-up and their organizational constraints. RESULTS: Over the study period, and after exclusion of IUGR, 96 SGA were followed up in the traditional pathway and 106 SGA were followed up in the standardized pathway P=0.75. The traditional pathway showed in multivariate analysis a higher prevalence of antenatal corticosteroid therapy for SGA (16,6%) between 2015 and 2017 with OR 7.3 95% CI [1.41-38.43] when compared to the standardized pathway (3,7%). Similarly, the traditional pathway proposes a higher prevalence of induction of labor (54,1%) than the standardized pathway (33,9%) between 2015 and 2017 with OR 3.19 95% CI [1.70-7.80]. The "a posteriori" post-hoc power of the study is 82.9%. CONCLUSION: This study confirms the absence of excessive obstetrical intervention in the SGA population when followed in a standardized healthcare pathway. The latter would reduce unnecessary obstetrical interventions while respecting the intrinsic neonatal prognosis of small for gestational age fetuses.

[Retrospective comparison of effectiveness of balloon catheter versus dinoprostone for cervical ripening]. / Comparaison rétrospective de l'efficacité du ballonnet extra-amniotique à la dinoprostone dans la maturation cervicale.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness and the safety of cervical ripening between two methods: the Cook double balloon catheter and the dinoprostone pessary (Propess 10mg). METHODS: We performed a retrospective comparative study in a French maternity. We analyzed 404 women with induction of labour after 37 gestational weeks, with singleton cephalic live fetus, unscarred uterus, unruptured membranes, and Bishop score<6. The primary endpoint was the time between the start of the ripening and the delivery. Secondary endpoints include effectiveness and safety outcomes of the methods. RESULTS: Compared to dinoprostone pessary, the balloon catheter was associated with a longer time to delivery (34.4±16.5 vs 25.5±15.3h; P<0.001). This difference is found in both primiparous and multiparous women. Balloon catheter is also associated with a smaller improvement of the Bishop score (2.5±2.1 vs 4.2±2.9 Bishop's points; P<0.001) and more failure to achieve delivery in 24h (32.3% vs 56.7%; P<0.001). There was no difference in mother and fetal safety. CONCLUSION: In this retrospective study, cervical ripening using balloon catheter seems to lengthen the induction of labour. No difference in safety outcomes with dinoprostone was found.

[Evolution of the cesarean delivery rate from 37 weeks of gestation among nulliparas or how to evaluate the external validity of a randomized North American trial about induction of labor]. / Évolution du taux de césariennes à partir de 37 semaines d'aménorrhée parmi les nullipares ou comment évaluer la validité externe d'un essai randomisé nord-américain sur le déclenchement artificiel du travail.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the risk of caesarean delivery (CD) when an expectant management is considered for a nulliparous reaching≥37 weeks of gestation (wog). METHODS: This is a prospective study, including all nulliparous women who delivered at≥37 wog a singleton fetus in a cephalic presentation between the first January 2017 and the 31st December 2017 in a French perinatal network (Mypa). For each week of gestation from 37 wog to 41 wog, the rate of CD was determined according the onset of labor (spontaneous or induced). The risk of CD when expectant management was considered at a specific gestational age was calculated by taking all the population who reached this gestational age, minus all women who had an induction of labor or underwent a caesarean delivery before labor. RESULTS: In total, 16,085 women delivered at≥24 wog, and 5498 (34.1%) were nulliparous with a singleton fetus in a cephalic presentation reaching 37SA. The risk of CD increased from 40 wog, whatever the labor was spontaneous or induced (when labor was spontaneous, the risk of CD was stable till 39 wog around 11%, and increased from 14% at 40 wog to 20% at 41 wog; similarly, when labor was induced, the risk of CD was stable till 39 wog around 28%, and increased from 40% at 40 wog to 38% at 41 wog. The risk of CD for a nulliparous reaching>37 Wog when expectant management is considered was stable around 22.3%. CONCLUSION: The risk of CD for a nulliparous reaching≥37SA when expectant management is considered is similar than the one in the United States of America.

[Term Prelabor Rupture of Membranes: CNGOF Guidelines for Clinical Practice - Timing of Labor Induction]. / Rupture des membranes à terme avant travail. Recommandations pour la pratique clinique du CNGOF ­ Faut-il déclencher ?

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of immediate induction versus expectant management on maternal and neonatal outcomes in case of term prelabor rupture of membranes. METHODS: We searched Medline Database, Cochrane Library and consulted international guidelines. RESULTS: In case of term prelabor rupture of membranes, induction of labor is associated with shorter rupture of membranes to delivery intervals when compared to expectant management, if induction is conducted with oxytocin (LE2), prostaglandin E2 (LE2) or misoprostol (LE2), but not when induction is conducted with Foley® catheter (LE2), osmotic dilatator (LE2) or acupuncture (LE2). The strongest evidence to date comes from a large international randomized study, the TERMPROM study, which included over 5000 women between 1992 and 1995. This study compared immediate induction with oxytocin or prostaglandin E2 to expectant management up to 96hours, followed by induction by oxytocin or prostaglandin E2. Immediate induction was not associated with a decreased neonatal infection rate (LE1), even among women with a positive streptococcus B vaginal swab (LE2). Thus, expectant management can be offered without increasing the neonatal infection risk (Grade B). Induction with oxytocin was associated with a decreased risk of intra-uterine infection and postpartum fever in the TERMPROM study (LE2), however, this study had significant limitations concerning this outcome (unknown streptococcus B status and low rate of prophylactic antibiotics), and this association was not found in other smaller studies. This decrease was not observed with induction by prostaglandin E2. In the TERMPROM study, induction was not associated with an increase or decrease in the rate of cesarean section (LE2), whatever the parity (LE2) or Bishop score at admission (LE3). Induction can thus be proposed without increasing the cesarean section risk (Grade B). There is no study evaluating expectant management over 4 days. CONCLUSION: In case of term prelabor rupture of membranes, induction can be offered without increasing the cesarean section risk (Grade B). Expectant management can be offered without increasing the neonatal infection risk (Grade B), even among women with a positive streptococcus B vaginal swab (Professional consensus). The optimal moment of induction will therefore be guided by the maternity wards organization and women's preference after having informed them of the risks and benefits associated with induction and expectant management (Professional consensus). In case of meconial fluid or term prelabor rupture of membranes>4 days, induction must be offered (Professional consensus).

[Term Prelabor Rupture of Membranes: CNGOF Guidelines for Clinical Practice - Methods for Inducing Labor]. / Rupture des membranes à terme avant travail. Recommandations pour la pratique clinique du CNGOF ­ Méthodes de déclenchement.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the studies comparing induction methods in women with term prelabor rupture of the membranes and establish if one is superior to the others. METHODS: The MedLine database, the Cochrane Library and the recommendations from the French and foreign obstetrical societies or colleges have been consulted. RESULTS: The included studies compared medical induction methods: oxytocin (intravenous), dinoprostone (vaginal gel, pessary or intracervical gel), and misoprostol (oral or vaginal route); and a mechanical induction method: the Foley catheter. The primary outcome measures were: labor induction to delivery interval, number of women delivered within 12 or 24hours of initiation of induction and cesarean delivery rate. The small sample size of the included studies as well as the limited number of reported complications does not provide a reasonable basis for concluding on the secondary outcome measures: pyrexia, chorioamnionitis, uterine tachysystole, Apgar scores of<7 at 5minutes. Induction of labor with misoprostol (oral and vaginal) reduced the labor induction to delivery interval compared with dinoprostone (LE2). This interval was unchanged when comparing induction with oxytocin and Foley catheter (LE2). The data comparing this interval in women induced with dinoprostone versus oxytocin and misoprostol versus oxytocin is limited or inconsistent. The cesarean delivery rate was comparable in women induced with dinoprostone (vaginal gel) versus oxytocin (LE2), misoprostol (oral and vaginal route) versus oxytocin (LE2), Foley catheter versus oxytocin (LE2), misoprostol versus dinoprostone (LE2) and misoprostol versus Foley catheter (LE2). The number of women delivered within 24hours of initiation of induction was comparable when induced with oral misoprostol versus oxytocin (LE2) and Foley catheter versus oxytocin (LE2). There is a lack of data for this outcome when comparing dinoprostone versus oxytocin, vaginal misoprotsol versus oxytocin, and misoprostol (oral and vaginal) versus dinoprostone. No induction method is superior to another for nulliparous women or women with unfavorable cervix (LE2). CONCLUSION: The superiority of an induction method, in terms of effectiveness or safety, could not be established with the current available data for women with term prelabor rupture of the membranes. An increased risk of chorioamnionitis due to induction using Foley catheter could not be ruled out by the available data. All medical methods are suitable for inducing women with term prelabor rupture of the membranes (Grade B).

[Breech Presentation: CNGOF Guidelines for Clinical Practice - Labour and Induction]. / Présentation du siège. Recommandations pour la pratique clinique du CNGOF ­ Accouchement.

OBJECTIVES: To issue guidelines on management of labour induction and breech vaginal delivery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Bibliographic search restricted to French and English languages using Medline database®, Cochrane Library and international guidelines of medical societies. RESULTS: Breech delivery must take place in a maternity ward, in the presence of an obstetrician and gynaecologist and with the immediate availability of an anesthesiologist and a pediatrician during active second stage (Professional consensus). Term breech is not a contraindication to labour induction when the criteria for acceptance of vaginal delivery are met (Grade C). In this case, oxytocin or prostaglandins can be used (Grade C). Epidural analgesia with low concentrations of local anesthetics should be encouraged in case of vaginal delivery attempt (Professional consensus). It is recommended to use continuous monitoring of the CTG (Professional consensus). The use of second-line fetal monitoring is not recommended (Professional consensus). The administration of oxytocin is possible for labour augmentation (Professional consensus). It is better to start the expulsive efforts when the presentation is engaged as low as possible in the pelvic excavation (Professional consensus). Breech presentation is not an indication of episiotomy (Professional consensus). Due to insufficient data, it was not possible to make recommendations on specificities of preterm breech delivery. CONCLUSION: In case of planned vaginal delivery, labour induction is possible for term breech fetuses, even with unfarable cervix. Guidelines for labour and vaginal delivery management have a low level of evidence.