Management from a multidisciplinary perspective of phlebitis related to peripheral venous catheter insertion: An international Delphi study.

AIM: To determine the consensus and importance of care practices related to the management of peripheral venous catheter (PVC)-related phlebitis in hospitalized patients through the views of experts from different disciplines. BACKGROUND: PVCs are commonly used in hospitals but are associated with complications such as phlebitis. Their management differs widely, and studies are heterogeneous. DESIGN: Delphi method. METHODS: Four stages: problem area (with Web of Science bibliometric review in July 2022), panel members, two Delphi rounds and closing criteria. In the Delphi survey, experts answered an online questionnaire based on assessment, treatment and follow-up dimensions (September 2022-February 2023). Statistical analyses were conducted of frequencies, percentages, measures of central tendency and levels of dispersion (QD). A space for comments was created, and a thematic analysis conducted of them. RESULTS: Eighteen experts (nurses, doctors and pharmacists) participated in the Delphi rounds. Forty-five activities were identified: 19 in assessment, 15 in treatment and 11 in follow-up. A high consensus level (QD ≤ 0.6) was found in five activities (11.12%), moderate level (0.6 < QD < 1.0) in 19 (42.22%) and low level (QD > 1.0) in 21 (46.66%). Seven themes were determined (patient perspective, lack of consensus, low evidence-based practices, stage-based treatments, prevention activities, high variability in practice and specialist teams and interdisciplinary work). CONCLUSION: The importance of systematic assessment scales is highlighted together with consensus on signs and symptoms (pain, redness, inflammation, palpable cord and induration). Treatment according to severity and daily visual recording and monitoring are emphasized along with the need for patient participation and healthcare literacy. A high level of consensus was obtained in 11% of the activities, showing the large variability of criteria and interventions for phlebitis management. Highlighted needs include working in a team, the use of specialist teams and promoting evidence- and prevention-based activities. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Clinical variability is noted and, therefore, the importance of consensus on standardized care for PVC phlebitis and evidence-based practice. REPORTING METHOD: Delphi studies (CREDES). PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Experts contribution.

Development of training program for the Eye, Ear, Nose, and Throat emergency nurses in China based on core competency: a Delphi study.

BACKGROUND: Nursing work in the Eye, Ear, Nose, and Throat (EENT) emergency department is highly specialised and faces significant challenges. Therefore, a high level of nursing competence is necessary for nurses. To develop core competencies, a systematic and standardised training program is required. This study aims to construct a standardised, systematic, and professional training program for nurses working in the EENT emergency department in China. METHODS: Based on a literature review and semi-structured interviews, the training scheme draft was developed according to the theoretical framework of core competency for emergency nurses. From July 2023 to October 2023, a total of 21 experts including clinical experts, and nursing experts were selected to conduct 2 rounds of Delphi consultation to construct the training program for EENT emergency nurses. RESULTS: The effective response rate for 2 rounds of expert consultation was 100%. The expert authority coefficient was 0.905, and Kendall's W coefficients were found to be 0.359 and 0.340, respectively. The coefficients of variation for each item of the second round of expert consultation ranged from 0 to 0.19. The finalised training program for EENT emergency nurses consisted of 4 first-level indexes (training objectives, training management, training contents, and training assessment). The training objectives included 3 secondary indicators and 16 tertiary indicators. Training management included 5 secondary indicators and 8 tertiary indicators. Training contents included 4 secondary indicators and 16 tertiary indicators. Training assessment included 3 secondary indicators and 6 tertiary indicators. CONCLUSION: This study systematically and comprehensively explores the cultivation of nurses working in the EENT emergency department from the aspects of training objectives, training management, training contents, and training assessment. This training program is based on the theoretical framework of core competency standards for emergency nurses. It is in line with the actual needs of the clinic, and the training program is scientific and reliable, which can be promoted nationwide to provide a reference basis for the improvement of the training of emergency specialist nurses. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Not applicable.

Development of the Saini-Hodgins Addiction Risk Potential of Games (SHARP-G) Scale: An International Delphi study.

Background and Objectives: As the gaming industry experiences exponential growth, concerns about gaming disorder (GD) also grow. It is crucial to understand the structural features of games that can interact with individual characteristics of gamers to promote GD. This research consolidates the views of an international body of panelists to create an assessment tool for gauging the addictive potential of distinct games. Methods: Utilizing the iterative and structured Delphi method, an international panel of researchers, clinicians, and people with lived experience were recruited to offer a multifaceted viewpoint on the addictive risk associated with specific structural elements in games. Two rounds of surveys facilitated consensus. Results: The panel initially included 40 members-ten from research, eight from clinical settings, and 22 with lived experiences. The second round included 27 panelists-seven from research, eight from clinical settings, and 11 with lived experiences. The study identified 25 structural features that contribute to potentially addictive gaming patterns. Discussion and Conclusions: Consensus was found for 25 features, which were distilled into a 23-item evaluation tool. The Saini-Hodgins Addiction Risk Potential of Games Scale (SHARP-G) consists of five overarching categories: 'Social,' 'Gambling-Like Features,' 'Personal Investment,' 'Accessibility,' and 'World Design.' SHARP-G yields a total score indicating level of addiction risk. A case study applying the scale to three games of differing perceived risk levels demonstrated that that score corresponded to game risk as expected. While the SHARP-G scale requires further validation, it provides significant promise for evaluating gaming experiences and products.

Clinical decision-making before discharge in hospitalized persons with schizophrenia: a Spanish Delphi expert consensus.

Introduction: The care of people with schizophrenia (PWS) is usually provided in an outpatient setting by community mental health teams. However, PWS frequently require inpatient treatment because of a wide array of clinical, personal and/or social situations. Unfortunately, to our knowledge, there are no guidelines available to help psychiatrists in the decision-making process on hospital discharge for PWS. The aim of this project was to develop an expert consensus on discharge criteria for PWS after their stay in an acute inpatient psychiatric unit. Methods: Using a modified Delphi method a group of 42 psychiatrists throughout Spain evaluated four areas of interest regarding this issue: clinical symptomatology, treatment-related factors, follow-up health care units after discharge, and physical health and monitoring. Results: After two rounds, among the 64 statements, a consensus was reached for 59 (92.2%) statements. In three (17.7%) of the 17 statements on 'clinical symptomatology' and 2 (13.3%) of the 15 statements on 'follow-up health care units after discharge', a consensus was not reached; in contrast, a consensus was reached for all statements concerning 'treatment-related factors' and those concerning 'physical health and monitoring'. The consensus results highlight the importance for discharge of the control of symptoms rather than their suppression during admission and of tolerability in the selection of anantipsychotic. Discussion: Although there is a lack of relevant data for guiding the discharge of PWS after hospitalization in an acute inpatient psychiatric unit, we expect that this consensus based on expert opinion may help clinicians to take appropriate decisions.

Mapping and ranking outcomes for the evaluation of seasonal influenza vaccine efficacy and effectiveness: a delphi study.

BACKGROUND: Protection provided by seasonal influenza vaccination (SIV) may be measured against numerous outcomes, and their heterogeneity may hamper decision-making. The aim of this study was to explore outcomes used for estimation of SIV efficacy/effectiveness (VE) and obtain expert consensus on their importance. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: An umbrella review was first conducted to collect and map outcomes considered in systematic reviews of SIV VE. A Delphi study was then performed to reach expert convergence on the importance of single outcomes, measured on a 9-point Likert scale, in principal target groups, namely children, working-age adults, older adults, subjects with co-morbidities and pregnant women. RESULTS: The literature review identified 489 outcomes. Following data reduction, 20 outcomes were selected for the Delphi process. After two Delphi rounds and a final consensus meeting, convergence was reached. All 20 outcomes were judged to be important or critically important. More severe outcomes, such as influenza-related hospital encounters and mortality with or without laboratory confirmation, were generally top-ranked across all target groups (median scores ≥8 out of 9). CONCLUSIONS: Rather than focusing on laboratory-confirmed infection per se, experimental and observational VE studies should include more severe influenza-related outcomes because they are expected to exercise a greater impact on decision-making.

Developing mental health curricula and a service provision model for clinical associates in South Africa: a Delphi survey of family physicians and psychiatrists.

BACKGROUND: Clinical associates are a health professional cadre that could be utilised in mental health task sharing in South Africa but this is training dependent. The objectives of the study were to identify the potential curricula content, training sites, and teaching modalities for undergraduate and potential postgraduate clinical associate mental health training and to identify the tasks that they should perform based on these curricula. METHODS: We utilised the Delphi method to reach consensus on items with the panel comprising psychiatrists and family physicians. The first round questionnaire of the Delphi survey was developed based on a literature review and the results from earlier phases of the overall study. The survey was administered electronically and consisted of three rounds. Following both the first and second rounds, an updated questionnaire was constructed omitting the items on which consensus was reached. The questionnaire consisted primarily of nine-point scales with consensus based on 70% of participants rating 1,2,3 or 7,8,9. RESULTS: There were 26 participants in the first round with this number falling to 23 in later rounds. There was strong consensus on a training attachment to a mental health clinic at a community health centre (CHC) at undergraduate (96.2%) and postgraduate level (100%). Consensus was reached on the importance of training on the management of six categories of disorders at the undergraduate level and nine categories of disorders at the postgraduate level. Clerking patients as a teaching modality reached 100% consensus at both undergraduate and postgraduate levels. PHC clinics, CHCs and district hospitals reached consensus as appropriate settings for clinical associates to provide mental health services. In addition, GP practices and secondary hospitals reached consensus for those with postgraduate training. Consensus was reached on ten of the 21 listed tasks that could be performed based on undergraduate training and 20 of the 21 tasks based on a postgraduate qualification in mental health. CONCLUSIONS: The Delphi panel's recommendations provide a clear roadmap for enhancing mental health curricula for clinical associates, enabling their utilisation in mental health service provision. A future postgraduate mental health qualification for clinical associates would allow for expanded task sharing.

Validation of adherence prediction system for lifestyle interventions in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

This editorial delves into the research article by Zeng et al published in the latest issue of World Journal of Gastroenterology. The manuscript contributes significantly to addressing the global health issue of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) by introducing and validating the Exercise and Diet Adherence Scale (EDAS). The article effectively conveys the importance of the study, highlighting the prevalence of NAFLD, the lack of approved drugs for its treatment, and the crucial role of lifestyle correction. The use of the Delphi method for scale deve-lopment and the subsequent evaluation of its reliability add scientific rigor to the methodology. The results demonstrate that the scale is correlated with key lifestyle indicators, which makes it a promising tool for assessing patient adherence to interventions. The identification of specific score thresholds for predicting adherence to daily calorie intake and exercise adds practical value to the scale. The differentiation among scores indicative of good, average, and poor adherence enhances its clinical applicability. In conclusion, the manuscript introduces EDAS, a valuable instrument that can contribute substantially to the field of NAFLD research and clinical practice.

The Delphi method to analyze the expert views on possible futures of the smart city adoption and development in developing countries: the case of Jordan.

Smart cities are characterized by the integration of various technologies and the use of data to achieve several objectives. These objectives include the creation of efficiencies, boosting economic development, expanding sustainability, and improving the overall quality of life for individuals residing and working within the urban environment. The aim of this study is to analyze the future of smart cities with respect to developing countries, specifically Jordan as the case. This analysis is based on the opinions and feedback from the field experts. In this study, we are tapping into multiple domains of smart cities such as smart governance, education, healthcare, communication, transportation, security, energy, and sustainability. The field experts' consensus was developed with the Delphi method. The Delphi survey comprises eight questions to assess the views about smart city adoption and development with respect to Jordan. The results and findings of this study revealed specific challenges and opportunities in smart city adoption with respect to Jordan. The experts' opinions have validated the study of the 2023 Smart City Index report. They have offered crucial input and future guidance for the adoption of smart cities in Jordan. Additionally, they have indicated which domains of smart cities should be prioritized during the implementation in Jordan.

Identifying Nursing-Sensitive Indicators for Hospitals: A Modified Delphi Approach.

BACKGROUND: Nursing-sensitive indicators (NSIs) play a crucial role in measuring the quality of care specific to nursing practice. Currently, hospitals monitor several NSIs which may vary between hospitals. Conducting research on NSIs can enhance the monitoring of nursing practice. AIM: The aim is to identify NSIs for hospitals in Jordan. METHODS AND MATERIAL: The Delphi approach was utilized to establish a consensus among a panel of national nursing experts (N=60). An initial list of 52 indicators was developed through a rigorous process and subsequently distributed to the panel members. The panelists provided their quantitative responses in three rounds. Consensus was determined based on the following criteria: agreement greater than 51.0%, interquartile range (IQR) below 1.5, standard deviation (SD) below 1, and moderate Kendall's coefficient of concordance (Kendall's W). RESULTS: By the conclusion of the third round, a total of 42 indicators achieved group agreement. The agreed-upon indicators consisted of 10 structure, 16 process, and 16 outcome indicators. CONCLUSION: This study successfully established a consensus and identified a comprehensive set of indicators that capture the distinct contributions of nursing in the hospital setting. The results demonstrate a wide range of agreed-upon indicators across the domains of structure, process, and outcome. These findings are valuable in enhancing the monitoring and evaluation of nursing practice in hospitals. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS:  The findings of this study provide a solid foundation for monitoring and reporting the quality of nursing practice in hospitals. Nursing policymakers can utilize these findings to develop policies that promote the voluntary reporting of NSIs.

Developing a Multi-Dimensional Health Index System for a General Occupational Population in the Light of Health Ecology Theory: A Delphi Study.

Background: The health status of the occupational population is critical to the development of countries and regions as it is the main force of social and economic development. However, there is a dearth of comprehensive and systematic indicators to evaluate the health of occupational groups. This study aimed to construct a multi-dimensional evaluation index system for the general population. Methods: This study combined a literature review and initially established a multidimensional health system framework for the occupational population based on health ecology theory and then used two rounds of Delphi expert consultation to construct the final multidimensional health index system for the occupational population. Fifteen experts from related fields were selected for two rounds of Delphi expert consultation. Results: The recovery rates of the two rounds of expert questionnaires were 100.00% and 93.33% respectively, the expert authority coefficient were 0.90, and the Kendall's coordination coefficients of the first and second level indexes were 0.32 and 0.42 (P ≥ 0. 001). The final index system includes four primary indicators (individual characteristics, health knowledge, health behavior, and health skills), 13 second-level indicators, and 41 third-level indicators; the weight coefficients of the four primary health dimensions are relatively close, and the "health knowledge" is slightly higher. Conclusion: The multi-dimensional health index system of the occupational population established in this study is comprehensive and reasonable from the perspective of health ecology, which can provide a solid foundation for the further development of a comprehensive health status prediction model for the occupational population.

Evidence gaps and challenges in maintaining and increasing vaccine uptake: A Delphi survey with Australian stakeholders.

ISSUE ADDRESSED: Increasing and maintaining vaccination uptake is crucial for preventing and managing infectious diseases. In the context of the post-coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic landscape, this paper examines the perceptions of immunisation implementers and policymakers to uncover the challenges and evidence gaps in routine immunisation efforts. METHODS: We conducted an online two-round modified Delphi survey with immunisation experts, senior public servants, policymakers, policy advisory groups, and representatives from peak bodies from across Australia. We asked respondents to outline what they see as the greatest challenges to increasing and maintaining uptake of recommended vaccines in Australia; the most difficult aspects of their work in vaccination; the largest evidence gaps in vaccine uptake; and the kinds of social and behavioural research they would like to see prioritised. RESULTS: The two most important challenges for increasing and maintaining vaccine uptake were effectively communicating the benefits of vaccines to parents and the public and ensuring accessible and affordable vaccination services. Participants strongly agreed that 'communication about the importance of vaccination' was the most difficult aspect of their work. Consistently important was the need to better engage specific population groups, such as culturally and linguistically diverse people, pregnant people, at risk cohorts, and health care providers. Social and behavioural research about 'how to effectively address hesitancy' was ranked highly among participants. CONCLUSIONS: Findings from this project help provide an understanding of the behavioural, social, ethical, and policy knowledge needs for immunisation policy and implementation in Australia. To respond to vaccine challenges, increase coverage and build public trust in vaccination, policymakers and governments should incorporate social research into vaccination programmes. SO WHAT?: Australia is preparing to launch a Centre for Disease Control. This study demonstrates the importance of integrating social, behavioural, ethical, and policy research into the fabric of this new enterprise. It underlines the need to capacity-build a workforce able to deliver high-quality research in these areas, address the needs of immunisation implementers and policymakers, and achieve good outcomes for Australians.

Establishing a course to train ICU nurses on prone position mechanical ventilation: A Delphi study.

AIM: To develop a comprehensive training course for training ICU nurses in prone positioning. DESIGN: A mixed study combining semi-structured interviews and two rounds of Delphi surveys. METHODS: We constructed a questionnaire after collecting data through a literature review and semi-structured interviews. We used the Delphi expert correspondence method to conduct two rounds of research among 17 experts in the field of critical illness. Data collection took place between May and August 2022. RESULTS: The effective questionnaire recovery rate was 88.2%. The expert authority coefficient was 0.876; the Kendall coordination coefficient was 0.402; the average importance score for each index ranged from 4.00 to 4.93; and the coefficient of variation for each index ranged from 0.05 to 0.19. We established 13 second-level indicators and 41 third-level indicators on prone position ventilation training according to three aspects: training contents, training methods and training assessment. The training system of prone mechanical ventilation for ICU nurses established in this study will provide an effective framework for training and evaluating the practical ability of prone mechanical ventilation for ICU nurses.

[CONSENSUS UPDATE OF THE POPI TOOL]. / MISE A JOUR PAR CONSENSUS DE L'OUTIL POPI.

Medication errors are one of the causes of iatrogenic medication use in children. The POPI tool for detecting inappropriate drug prescriptions and prescription omissions in paediatrics was the first tool to be published in this field in 2014. Our aim was to update the POPI tool for French use based on current recommendations and practice. Criteria were removed, updated or added based on recommendations from learned societies and national bodies. The two-round Delphi method was used to reach a consensus of experts. The level of agreement of the healthcare professionals' proposals was rated on a 9-point Likert scale. In the first round, only proposals with a median agreement of 7 to 9 and an agreement of more than 65% were retained. In the second round, only those with a median agreement of 7 to 9 and over 75% agreement were retained. The POPI tool now includes eight categories (various, infectiology, gastroenterology, pneumonology, dermatology, neurology/pedopsychiatry, haematology and excipients). All the criteria were supported by bibliographical references. They were submitted to 20 French healthcare professionals: 9 pharmacists and 11 doctors (17 hospital-based and 3 self-employed). After two rounds of Delphi testing, 166 criteria were retained and validated (111 inappropriate prescriptions and 54 omissions). In conclusion, this study made it possible to update the POPI tool, which is still available for assessing paediatric prescriptions.

Delphi Method Analysis and Consensus of Prevalent Distinctive Practices for Biliary Atresia Management after Kasai Portoenterostomy.

Background: Extrahepatic biliary atresia (BA) is seen in infants, with an incidence of 1 in 15,000 live births. The presentation is progressive jaundice, dark-colored urine, and clay-colored stools. Kasai portoenterostomy (KPE) is the commonly performed surgical procedure in these patients. Postoperatively, phenobarbitone, ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA), steroids, and other drugs are given to improve bile drainage and prevent inflammation and fibrosis. However, a definitive protocol regarding the need for different drugs, dosage, and duration varies across individual surgeons and centers. No universally accepted protocol exists for postoperative management after KPE. Aim: The aim of this study was to know the prevailing postoperative management of BA by subject experts and use the Delphi process to know if the experts want to change their practice based on the results from the survey. Material and Methods: A questionnaire was made after discussing with two experts in the field of BA. The questionnaire was mailed to 25 subject experts. The first survey data were analyzed and shared with all responders. In the second survey, change in the management based on the results from the first survey was assessed. Results: The Delphi questionnaire was answered by 17 experts. Postoperatively, prophylactic antibiotics are prescribed for 6-12 weeks by around 40% and >12 weeks by 30% of respondents. Phenobarbitone is prescribed for <3 months by nearly 50%. UDCA is prescribed for <3 months, ≤6 months, and 6 months-1 year by 47.1%, 23.5%, and 23.5% responders, respectively. Nearly 50% prescribe steroids (mostly prednisolone), and among them, two-thirds prescribe it for 6-12 weeks. Approximately 60% give antiviral drugs to children who are cytomegalovirus immunoglobulin M positive. In our survey, 50% of experts perform 5-10 KPE per year, and 25% each perform 10-15 and >15 KPE per year. The second survey noted that a significant percentage of responders want to change their practice according to consensus. Conclusion: From our Delphi survey, an overview of the postoperative management of BA could be made. However, multicentric studies are required for uniform protocol on the postoperative management of BA.

Development of an evidence-based nursing practice program for preventing unplanned endotracheal extubations in the intensive care unit: A Delphi method study.

AIMS: This study aims to develop an evidence-based nursing practice program to prevent unplanned endotracheal extubation (UEE) among adult patients in the intensive care unit (ICU). DESIGN: This study uses the Delphi method to develop an evidence-based nursing practice program. METHODS: A comprehensive review of 18 databases and evidence-based websites was conducted to gather, assess and synthesize evidence on preventing UEEs in adult patients. Using this synthesized evidence, a questionnaire was formulated for further investigation. Subsequently, input was solicited from experts through Delphi surveys to establish an evidence-based nursing practice protocol for preventing UEEs in adult ICU patients. Consistency in consultation results guided subsequent rounds of consultation. RESULTS: The developed program comprised 43 evidence items categorized into nine dimensions, including risk assessment for unplanned extubation, sedation, analgesia, delirium, balloon management, psychosocial care, early extubation, catheter immobilization and protective restraints. Two rounds of expert inquiry yielded recovery rates of 94.7% and 100% for the first and second questionnaires, respectively. Kendall W values ranged from .224 to .353 (p < .001). CONCLUSION: This study developed an evidence-based nursing practice program to prevent UEE in adult ICU patients, employing evidence-based practices and Delphi expert consultation methods. However, further validation of the program's effectiveness is warranted. REPORTING METHOD: Findings were reported according to the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research checklist. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Nurses contributed to the study by participating in investigations. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND PATIENT CARE: The program developed in this study offers an evidence-based framework for preventing unplanned extubation in hospitals, thereby reducing its incidence and enhancing the quality of nursing care.

An evaluation framework for low performers and human resource management planning: Application to a life insurance company in Korea.

This study comprehensively explores the factors that lead to low performers in an organization. A thorough literature review was conducted to construct an interview guide and obtain classification criteria for the factors that lead to low performers. Managers and low performers at multiple firms were interviewed individually to understand the various phenomena related to low performers in organizations. Based on the content of these interviews, 12 factors, classified into individual, leader, work, and organizational dimensions, were identified after three rounds of revisions by business administration experts. Next, a case study of Korea's S Life Insurance Company was conducted to examine the practical implications of the factors that contribute to creating low performers. In this case study, the analytic hierarchy process (AHP), involving eight departmental heads S Life Insurance Company's HR division, was utilized to identify the main factors that must be considered when evaluating low performers. While previous studies have examined low performers either at the individual, organizational, or institutional levels, this study presents a comprehensive and integrated evaluation framework of the factors that cause low performers. The proposed framework facilitates the identification and evaluation of low performers in various organizations and industries, and thus has practical implications in terms of establishing strategies to manage low performers more efficiently and improve organizational performance.

Construction of nursing-sensitive quality indicators for acute poisoning in emergency departments: An e-Delphi study.

AIMS: The aim of the study was to develop a set of nursing-sensitive quality indicators for acute poisoning in emergency departments. DESIGN: A two-round e-Delphi study was conducted from July to November 2023. METHODS: Subject-matter experts from 19 tertiary hospitals across four provinces of China participated in the survey. Potential indicators identified through a literature review were rated on a 5-point Likert scale and comments solicited. Descriptive statistics were used to demonstrate convergence of expert opinion, and consensus was reached in two rounds. Weights of each indicator were determined by analytic hierarchy process. There were 20 expert responses in Round 1 and 18 in Round 2. RESULTS: After two rounds, experts reached a consensus on definitions, calculation formulas, and data collection methods for these indicators. Three primary and 11 secondary indicators were included in the final nursing-sensitive quality indicators for acute poisoning in the emergency department. CONCLUSION: A set of indicators about acute poisoning care, applicable to the Chinese context, was developed in collaboration with emergency nurse specialists. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND PATIENT CARE: The lack of supervision of the nursing quality for acute poisoning leads to great variability in clinical practice in different medical institutions. The results can help in their standardization in China and in other countries lacking regulation. Our study also offers nursing managers a concrete and operable evaluation tool for quality supervision. Normative nursing behaviours are conducive to increase safety and enhance patients' experience of medical treatment. IMPACT: The indicators identified in this study closely approach clinical practice and exhibit the characteristics of sensitivity and practicality. Although developed in the Chinese healthcare system, there is potential for adoption or adaption in other healthcare settings. REPORTING METHOD: This study was reported in line with the Conducting and REporting of DElphi studies (CREDE) guidance on Delphi studies. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No patient or public contribution in this study. CONTRIBUTION TO THE WIDER GLOBAL CLINICAL COMMUNITY: The nursing quality of acute poisoning in emergency departments remains a growing attention, but the relevant assessment tools are lack. This study provides a set of nursing-sensitive quality indicators for acute poisoning to guide the quality monitoring of nursing managers. Study recommendations have broad applicability to all healthcare professionals who are engaged in emergency nursing.

The study of constructing evaluation indicators for the implementation of employee assistance programs in public sectors.

Introduction: Employee assistance programs require resources and manpower of various natures across different types of public sector organization. Methods: This study began by outlining elements for comparing employee assistance programs' evaluation criteria in four types of public sector organization on the basis of 22 service measures for such programs implemented by the Ministry of Labor in relation to three major aspects: work, life, and health. Elements of the evaluation criteria for public sector employee assistance programs were determined by surveying a panel of experts using the modified Delphi method. Last, the weight associated with the elements of evaluation criteria were calculated using the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process, and the criteria of four types of public sector organization were explored. Results: Data analysis indicated that the weight and priorities associated with elements of evaluation criteria for EAPs implemented by four types of public sector organization were not fully identical. Discussion: The results of this study suggest that, in terms of EAPs, the Directorate-General of Personnel Administration of the Executive Yuan should be pursuant to appropriate employee assistance programs provided by various public sector organizations according to the needs of their employees as well as the diverse objective conditions in which these organizations operate.

Consensus Guideline on the Management of Epilepsy in Egypt: A National Delphi Consensus Study.

OBJECTIVE: In epilepsy, early diagnosis, accurate determination of epilepsy type, proper selection of antiseizure medication, and monitoring are all essential. However, despite recent therapeutic advances and conceptual reconsiderations in the classification and management of epilepsy, serious gaps are still encountered in day-to-day practice in Egypt as well as several other resource-limited countries. Premature mortality, poor quality of life, socio-economic burden, cognitive problems, poor treatment outcomes, and comorbidities are major challenges that require urgent actions to be implemented at all levels. In recognition of this, a group of Egyptian epilepsy experts met through a series of consecutive meetings to specify the main concepts concerning the diagnosis and management of epilepsy, with the ultimate goal of establishing a nationwide Egyptian consensus. METHODS: The consensus was developed through a modified Delphi methodology. A thorough review of the most recent relevant literature and international guidelines was performed to evaluate their applicability to the Egyptian situation. Afterward, several remote and live rounds were scheduled to reach a final agreement for all listed statements. RESULTS: Of 278 statements reviewed in the first round, 256 achieved ≥80% agreement. Live discussion and refinement of the 22 statements that did not reach consensus during the first round took place, followed by final live voting then consensus was achieved for all remaining statements. SIGNIFICANCE: With the implementation of these unified recommendations, we believe this will bring about substantial improvements in both the quality of care and treatment outcomes for persons with epilepsy in Egypt. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: This work represents the efforts of a group of medical experts to reach an agreement on the best medical practice related to people with epilepsy based on previously published recommendations while taking into consideration applicable options in resource-limited countries. The publication of this document is expected to minimize many malpractice issues and pave the way for better healthcare services on both individual and governmental levels.

Management of Primary Immune Thrombocytopenia - Turkish Modified Delphi-Based Consensus Statement for Special Considerations.

Introduction: Primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an acquired disorder of platelets with complex and unclear mechanism of increased immune distruction or impaired production of platelets. While management of ITP is evolving, there is a need for guidance particularly in certain circumstances such as pregnancy, emergency and for patients requiring co-medications. We aimed to determine the tendencies of hematologists in Turkiye on such special conditions. Methods: As a modified Delphi method, Turkish National ITP Working Group founded under Turkish Society of Hematology developed a questionnaire consisting of statements regarding pregnancy, emergency and circumstances regarding co-treatment with antiaggregant or anticoagulants. 107 Hematologists working either in university or state hospitals voted for their agreement or disagreement of the statements for two consequential rounds. Results: Participant hematologists reached an agreement on the starting treatment in pregnant patients with platelets less than 30 x109/L and delivery of either normal or cesarian section to be safely performed above 50 x109/L. For emergency and rescue management of ITP, our panel have agreed against the use of high dose corticosteroids alone, preferred a combination with transfusion or IVIG. For patients who require interventions, platelet counts >50 x109/L were regarded as safe for low risk procedures as well as co-treatment with antiplatelets or anticoagulants. Conclusion: As National ITP study group, we have observed the need to increase the practice guidance in patients with primary ITP requiring additional treatments including invasive interventions, and co-treatments towards coagulation. Decisions on the management of ITP during pregnancy should be individualized. There is a certain lack of consensus on the thresholds of platelet counts as well as co-morbidities and co-medications. This lack of consensus may be due to the variations in the practices.