Application of Intramedullary Calcar Support Plate and Lateral Locking Plate in Elderly Patients with Neer 3 and 4-Part Fractures of Proximal Humerus Through a Deltoid Splitting Approach.

Background: The reduction and fixation of Medial humeral calcar is difficult in the treatment of elderly proximal humerus Neer 3 and 4-part fractures with a single lateral locking plate. Our study investigated the efficacy of an intramedullary calcar supporting plate combined with a lateral locking plate for the treatment of 3- and 4-part fractures of the proximal humerus in the elderly through a deltoid splitting approach. Methods: From June 2022 to December 2022, we treated six elderly patients with Neer 3 and 4-part fractures using proximal humeral intramedullary calcar support plate in combination with lateral locking plate through a deltoid splitting approach. Follow-up time was 6-12 months. Assessment indicators included fracture union, quality of reduction, and complication rate. The Constant-Murley score was used to record shoulder function at 6 months postoperatively. Results: All 6 patients showed fracture union and anatomic reduction. Constant-Murley score was 79.5 (70-90) at 6 months postoperatively. There was no incision non-healing, internal fixation failure, bone non-union or surgical site infection, secondary surgery, or death. Shoulder impingement occurred in 1 case. Conclusion: Proximal humeral intramedullary calcar support plate combined with lateral locking plate fixation through a deltoid splitting approach can effectively maintain fracture reduction, prevent inversion collapse of humeral head and internal fixation failure, and provide satisfactory clinical results at an early stage. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43465-024-01098-3.

Is there any clinical significance of axillary nerve electrophysiological changes in the deltoid split approach?

Purpose: The clinical effects of axillary nerve injury in the deltoid splitting approach are controversial. This study investigated the axillary nerve function with clinical and electrophysiologically in proximal humeral fracture patients with internal fixation using the deltoid split approach. We also aimed to investigate the effects of this damage on deltoid muscle volume and discuss the effects of volumetric changes and nerve damage on patients' clinical outcomes. Methods: study designed prospectively with 25 consecutive patients who received open reduction and internal fixation of proximal humerus fracture through a deltoid splitting approach. We performed clinical, electrophysiological, and radiological examinations during minimum follow-up time of 24 months. Electrophysiological examination comprised electromyoneurography (EMNG). Functional results followed by Constant-Murley and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores. Deltoid volumes were evaluated with magnetic resonance imaging. Results: Twenty-five patients operated on with open reduction internal fixation were prospectively observed. In the EMNG measurements of the patients on the 45th postoperative day, partial degeneration was observed in the anterior part of the axillary nerve in all cases (100%). In the control EMNG measurements performed at the 12th month, normal values were obtained for 15 (60%) of the patients, while findings of ongoing regeneration were detected for 10 (40%) of the patients and normal values at all patients at the 24th month. The difference between abnormal and normal EMNG groups' on 12th month Constant-Murley scores was not statistically significant in any period. Only anterior muscle thickness was statistically higher in the normal patient group than with abnormal EMNG results. Conclusions: In proximal humeral fractures treated with the deltoid split approach, there may be iatrogenic damage of the anterior branch of the axillary nerve. Axillary nerve damage does not affect the patients' clinical scores in the early and mid-terms. Level of evidence: LEVEL III.

Acromion-axillary nerve distance and its relation to the arm length in the prediction of the axillary nerve position: a clinical study.

BACKGROUND: Because of the broad anatomic variation in the course of the axillary nerve, several cadaveric studies have investigated the acromion-axillary nerve distance and its association with the humeral length to predict the axillary nerve location. This study aimed to analyze the acromion-axillary nerve distance (AAND) and its relation to the arm length (AL) in patients who underwent internal plate fixation for proximal humerus fractures. METHODS: The present prospective study involved 37 patients (15 female, 22 male; the mean age = 51 years, age range 19-76) with displaced proximal humerus fractures treated by open reduction and internal fixation. After anatomic reduction and fixation were achieved, the following parameters were measured in each patient before wound closure without making an extra incision or dissection: (1) the distance from the anterolateral edge of the acromion to the course of the axillary nerve was recorded as the acromion-axillary nerve distance and (2) the distance from the anterolateral edge of the acromion to the lateral epicondyle of the humerus was recorded as arm length. The ratio of AAND to AL was then calculated and recorded as the axillary nerve index (ANI). RESULTS: The mean AAND was 6 ± 0.36 cm (range 5.5-6.6), and the mean arm length was 32.91 ± 2.9 cm (range 24-38). The mean axillary nerve ratio was 0.18 ± 0.02 (range 0.16 to 0.23). There was a significant moderate positive correlation between AL and AAND (p = 0.006; r = 0.447). The axillary nerve location was predictable in only 18% of the patients. CONCLUSION: During the anterolateral deltoid-splitting approach to the shoulder joint, 5.5 cm from the anterolateral edge of the acromion could be considered a safe zone to prevent possible axillary nerve injury.

Outcomes of plate osteosynthesis for displaced 3-part and 4-part proximal humerus fractures with deltopectoral vs. deltoid split approach.

PURPOSE: Three part and four-part fractures of the proximal humerus offer challenges in reduction and plate fixation, with considerable debate about use of Deltoid splitting (DS) and Delto-pectoral (DP) approaches, especially when they involving the greater tuberosity. We prospectively compared the results using DS approach and DP approach in these cases, with special focus on functional outcomes, complications, and ease of tuberosity reduction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 84 patients with three- and four-part proximal humerus fracture were alternately allocated the DP approach or DS approach for proximal humerus locking plate fixation. The outcome analysis was done by evaluating relative Constant score and ease of surgical reduction of greater tuberosity; radiological malunion was evaluated using Beredjiklian classification and complications were noted. RESULTS: At mean follow-up of 23 months (19-48 months), the mean 'relative Constant score was 74.27 ± 8.19 in the DP group and 73.26 ± 8.02 in the DS group and the difference was statistically insignificant (p = 0.988). There was no significant difference with respect to shoulder ROM, abductor strength, radiological malunion or complications. However, the mean surgical time was significantly less (p value = 0.042) in DS group (65 ± 5 min) in comparison to DP group (92 ± 4.3 min); significantly less difficulties were documented by the surgeon in reducing the greater tuberosity in DS group(p value = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Although surgical time was reduced and greater tuberosity reduction was easier in DS group, the other outcomes were similar; either surgical approach can be used based, and can be based on the experience and comfort level of the surgeon.

Reconstruction of a Chronic Posterior Dislocation of the Shoulder using a Limited Posterior Deltoid-splitting Approach: A Case Report.

INTRODUCTION: Chronic posterior dislocation is a very rare injury. Various methods have been described for its treatment. This report describes a rare case of post-traumatic chronic posterior dislocation of the shoulder. Posterior bone block procedure performed through a limited posterior deltoid splitting approach was used with good surgical outcomes. The bone block procedure for chronic posterior dislocation is rarely described in the literature. CASE REPORT: A 30-year-old male presented with complaints of pain on movement of the left shoulder and inability to lift the arm overhead for the past 5 months, following a fall from a moving train on his left shoulder. He had been treated conservatively with no improvement in symptoms. On clinical examination, there was a loss of deltoid contour with painful and restricted abduction and external rotation. The shoulder joint could be reduced by bringing the arm in 90o of abduction in the scapular plane. The anteroposterior radiograph showed a positive light bulb sign and a malunited fracture greater tuberosity. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed a reverse Hill-Sachs lesion with intact rotator cuff. Unlike a classical chronically dislocated joint, the shoulder joint was not stiff in this position. The reduction of the joint was possible but was not maintained in the resting position of the limb. Hence, the joint could be reduced intraoperatively, and reduction maintained with a posterior bone block procedure, without any need for further soft-tissue releases. A tricortical iliac crest bone graft was used as the bone block. CONCLUSION: Chronic posterior dislocation of the shoulder is a rarely reported entity, which can be easily missed in clinical examination. The limited deltoid splitting approach is a safe approach with excellent exposure of posterior glenoid rim. Posterior bone block procedure is a viable reconstructive option in treating cases of chronic posterior dislocation.

The functional outcome of direct lateral approach for fixation of proximal humeral fractures: A case series from a tertiary care hospital.

Displaced proximal humeral fractures warrant surgical fixation for early rehabilitation and better functional outcome. These fractures are traditionally fixed by delto pectoral surgical approach. Direct lateral approach has recently gained interest as it involves less soft tissue dissection and is particularly helpful in certain fracture patterns. However, there have been concerns of axillary nerve damage with this approach. We report a case series of proximal humerus fractures fixed by direct lateral approach from our institution. All displaced Type 2 and 3 fractures were included in our study. Pathological and comminuted Type 4 fractures and fractures with ipsilateral clavicle or elbow fractures were excluded. Oxford Shoulder Score was done at regular intervals for assessment of functional outcome. We did not observe any axillary nerve damage in our case series and the outcomes of 70.5% of our patients were excellent while in 29.5% it was good. We recommend direct lateral approach for specific pattern of proximal humerus fractures.

A modified deltoid splitting approach with axillary nerve bundle mobilization for proximal humeral fracture fixation.

INTRODUCTION: The deltopectoral and the deltoid splitting approach are commonly used for the treatment of proximal humeral fractures. While the deltopectoral approach requires massive soft tissue devascularization, the deltoid splitting approach needs an additional skipped incision to avoid axillary nerve injury. The purpose of this study was to describe a modified anterolateral deltoid splitting approach with axillary nerve bundle mobilization in the treatment of proximal humeral fractures and to assess its radiologic and clinical outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-two consecutive patients with proximal humeral fractures were treated with minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis by using a modified anterolateral deltoid splitting approach with axillary nerve bundle mobilization. The patients were divided into two groups: 10 patients of Neer type 2 or 3 fractures vs. 12 patients of Neer type 4 fractures. The mean age of the study population was 63.5 years (range: 30-80 years). Six patients had valgus impacted fractures, and nine had fractures with medial comminution. RESULTS: Fracture union was achieved in all cases. The mean time to union was 8.6 weeks (range: 6-12 weeks). Major complications, such as avascular necrosis of the humeral head and varus collapse at the fracture site, were not observed. No patients had clinically detectable sensory deficits in the axillary nerve distribution or paralysis of the anterior deltoid muscle. The mean neck-shaft angle at the final follow-up was 136.9° (range, 115°-159°). The mean visual analog score for patient satisfaction was 9.1 (range, 6-10), and the mean Neer scores were 93.5 (range, 84-100). There were no significant differences between the two groups with respect to radiologic and clinical outcomes except Neer scores: 95.8 (range: 86-100) in Neer type 2 or 3 fractures and 91.7 (range: 84-99) in Neer type 4 fractures. CONCLUSION: The use of a modified anterolateral deltoid splitting approach with axillary nerve bundle mobilization in the treatment of proximal humeral fractures yielded excellent outcomes. This approach is a useful alternative to the deltopectoral or the deltoid splitting approaches in the treatment of proximal humeral fractures.

Clinical study of two approaches for the treatment of proximal humerus fractures / 中国综合临床

Objective To evaluate the effect of locking plate in the treatment of proximal humerus fractures and to compare the results of two approaches used for fixation.Methods Surgical treatment of 47 cases of proximal humerus fractures in the elderly in Affiliated Hospital of Yan′an University from September 2014 to September 2015.All fractures were randomly divided into two groups and treated with Phlios plate.Deltoid splitting and deltopectoral approaches were used for fixation respectively 23 cases and 24 cases.Postoperative shoulder function was evaluated according to Neer Score.Results The operation time,length of incision,intraoperative bleeding,fracture healing time,length of hospitalization in thoracic deltoid muscle group were more than deltoid splitting pathway group((90.1±6.3) min vs.(73.0±9.5) min,(10.0±3.5) cm vs.(6.3±2.6) cm,(100.0±30.1) ml vs.(90.6±36.4) ml,(3.2±0.8) months vs.(3.0±0.7) months,(10.3±1.9) d vs.(10.1±1.9) d),the difference of operation time(t=2.133,P=0.042) and length of incision(t=2.236,P=0.036) was statistically significant between the two groups,while the difference of the intraoperative bleeding(t=1.867,P=0.063),fracture healing time(t=1.064,P=0.242) and length of hospitalization(t=0.667,P=0.256) were not statistically significant.Followed up for 6.0-12.0 months,the average was (9.0±2.0) months,all patients achieved the bony healing.During the followed up,5 complication(10.6%) were encountered,including 2 cases of varus malunion,1 case of acromial impingement(115°-124°),1 case of screw cut-out and 1 case of humerus head osteonecrosis.The patients with tow-or three parts fractrues in tow groups,Neer-Score scores were statistically significant ((76.8±2.8) points vs.(76.1±2.6) points,(78.9±2.3) points vs.(77.8±2.4) points,t=2.76,2.58,P0.05).The excellent-good rate in triangle muscle splitting approach group was 91.3%(21/23),of thoracic deltoid muscle group was 58.3%(14/24),there were significant different existed in two groups(P=0.023).Conclusion Locking plate for the treatment of proximal humerus fractures has a good effect.Deltoid splitting approach in the prognosis of function recovery has more advantages.

An Anterosuperior Deltoid Splitting Approach for Plate Fixation of Proximal Humeral Fractures

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the usefulness and safety of the anterosuperior deltoid splitting approach for fixation of displaced proximal humeral fractures by analyzing the surgical outcomes. METHODS: Twenty-three patients who could be followed-up for at least 8 months after the treatment of displaced proximal humeral fractures through the anterosuperior deltoid splitting approach were enrolled. We evaluated the reduction of the fractures and surgery-related complications at the last follow-up using X-ray results and clinical outcomes comprising the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) scoring system and the Korean Shoulder Society (KSS) score. RESULTS: At the last follow-up of patients treated using the anterosuperior deltoid splitting approach for internal fixation of proximal humeral fractures, we found 22 cases (95.6%) of bone union, a mean UCLA score of 28.3 (range, 15 to 34) and a mean KSS score of 82.1 (range, 67 to 95). Various surgery-related complications were noted; a case of varus malunion after fracture displacement, a case of nonunion, a case of delayed union, two cases of impingement, and a case of partial axillary nerve injury, which recovered completely through the follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Plate fixation using the anterosuperior deltoid splitting approach could be another reliable option for treating displaced proximal humeral fractures.

An Anterosuperior Deltoid Splitting Approach for Plate Fixation of Proximal Humeral Fractures

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the usefulness and safety of the anterosuperior deltoid splitting approach for fixation of displaced proximal humeral fractures by analyzing the surgical outcomes. METHODS: Twenty-three patients who could be followed-up for at least 8 months after the treatment of displaced proximal humeral fractures through the anterosuperior deltoid splitting approach were enrolled. We evaluated the reduction of the fractures and surgery-related complications at the last follow-up using X-ray results and clinical outcomes comprising the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) scoring system and the Korean Shoulder Society (KSS) score. RESULTS: At the last follow-up of patients treated using the anterosuperior deltoid splitting approach for internal fixation of proximal humeral fractures, we found 22 cases (95.6%) of bone union, a mean UCLA score of 28.3 (range, 15 to 34) and a mean KSS score of 82.1 (range, 67 to 95). Various surgery-related complications were noted; a case of varus malunion after fracture displacement, a case of nonunion, a case of delayed union, two cases of impingement, and a case of partial axillary nerve injury, which recovered completely through the follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Plate fixation using the anterosuperior deltoid splitting approach could be another reliable option for treating displaced proximal humeral fractures.

Shoulder hemiarthroplasty for proximal humeral fractures: comparisons between the deltopectoral and anterolateral deltoid-splitting approaches.

BACKGROUND: Shoulder hemiarthroplasty is a widely accepted method for treating complex proximal humeral fractures, and the deltopectoral approach is the most popular route for this procedure. The purpose of the current study was to define and compare outcomes of shoulder hemiarthroplasty when using deltopectoral or anterolateral deltoid-splitting approaches. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two cohorts of patients were compared for clinical and radiographic outcomes at the same postoperative follow-up periods: a deltopectoral group (DP group) of 15 patients, from November 2004 to April 2007, and an anterolateral deltoid-splitting group (DS group) of 17 patients, from May 2007 to December 2009. Pain scores, goniometric measurements of the range of motion, and Constant scores were recorded for clinical assessment. Radiographic evaluations were recorded for stem osteolysis, tuberosity absorption, joint subluxation, and acromiohumeral distance. RESULTS: The 2 groups did not differ significantly in demographic data, preoperative fracture classification, surgical timing, early postoperative radiographic findings, and 2-year radiographic results. The DS group had less immediate postoperative pain (P = .025). At the 2-year follow-up assessment, the groups did not difference significantly in shoulder abduction and forward flexion. All prostheses survived until the 2-year assessment. CONCLUSION: When performing shoulder hemiarthroplasty for complex proximal humeral fractures, we found that the anterolateral deltoid-splitting approach provides an easier route for assessing posterior fracture fragments and managing rotator cuff tissue. The anterolateral deltoid-splitting approach was shown to be an acceptable alternative route for shoulder hemiarthroplasty than the standard deltopectoral approach.