Five-Word Test, Screening of Mixed Dementia in Older Adults. Validation Study.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: The prevalence of mixed dementia (MixD), defined as the coexistence of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and vascular dementia (VaD), is likely to increase as the population ages. The five-word test (5WT) is a neuropsychological test that differentiates between major and mild neurocognitive disorder (NCD). The objective of the study is to validate 5WT for the detection of MixD. METHODS: 230 participants were evaluated: cognitively healthy (CH) (n=70), mild NCD (n=70), and major NCD (n=90): AD (n=30), VaD (n=30), and MixD (n=30). The Spearman's coefficient, d Sommer and ROC curves were used to determine the construct validity of the 5WT. The linear regression model was performed to determine the association between age and education with 5WT performance. RESULTS: The mean age was 79 ±7.7 years (P≤.001), 58% were female (P=.252), and the mean education was 9 ±5.3 years (P≤.001). Construct validity when comparing 5WT and MMSE was: Spearman's correlation ρ=.830 (P<.001) and d Sommer=.41 (P<.001). The area under the curve in the total weighted score (TWS) for MixD was .985, with 98% sensitivity (95%CI, 0.96-1.00) and 99% specificity (95%CI, 0.94-1.00), PPV of 88% (95%CI, 0.82-0.89), NPV of 100% (95%CI, 0.96-1.00), and cut-off point ≤16/20 (P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: 5WT is a rapid test with neuropsychological validation for the exploration of cognitive characteristics in major NCD type MixD, regardless of age and education.

Factors associated with mixed dementia vs Alzheimer disease in elderly Mexican adults. / Factores asociados a la demencia mixta en comparación con demencia tipo Alzheimer en adultos mayores mexicanos.

INTRODUCTION: Mixed dementia (DMix) refers to dementia resulting from Alzheimer disease in addition to cerebrovascular disease. The study objectives were to determine the clinical and imaging factors associated with Dmix and compare them to those associated with Alzheimer disease. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Cross-sectional study including 225 subjects aged 65 years and over from a memory clinic in a tertiary hospital in Mexico City. All patients underwent clinical, neuropsychological, and brain imaging studies. We included patients diagnosed with DMix or Alzheimer disease (AD). A multivariate analysis was used to determine factors associated with DMix. RESULTS: We studied 137 subjects diagnosed with Dmix. Compared to patients with AD, Dmix patients were older and more likely to present diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidaemia, and history of cerebrovascular disease (P<.05). The multivariate analysis showed that hypertension (OR 1.92, CI 1.62-28.82; P=.009), white matter disease (OR 3.61, CI 8.55-159.80; P<.001), and lacunar infarcts (OR 3.35, CI 1.97-412.34; P=.014) were associated with Dmix, whereas a history of successfully treated depression showed an inverse association (OR 0.11, CI 0.02-0-47; P=.004) CONCLUSIONS: DMix may be more frequent than AD. Risk factors such as advanced age and other potentially modifiable factors were associated with this type of dementia. Clinicians should understand and be able to define Dmix.

Perfil cognoscitivo de adultos mayores de 60 años con y sin deterioro cognoscitivo / Cognitive profile of adults over 60 years with and without cognitive impairment

Introducción: En el envejecimiento, las funciones cognoscitivas se caracterizan por un decremento y variabilidad en sus procesos, discernir si se trata de un envejecimiento normal o un deterioro patológico es clínicamente difícil; los límites no son precisos, además, intervienen variables como la edad, escolaridad y las diferencias poblacionales. Con el objetivo de caracterizar el perfil neuropsicológico de adultos mayores de 60 años con y sin deterioro cognoscitivo se estudió una muestra de 536 adultos mayores de 60 años con queja subjetiva o de familiares en los proceso de memoria, los cuales, fueron pacientes del Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición “Salvador Zubirán” de la Ciudad de México, entre los años 2006 a 2010. Por consenso interdisciplinario de especialistas con énfasis en la evaluación neuropsicológica, se dividió la muestra en: Envejecimiento Normal (EN), Deterioro cognitivo Leve (DCL), Enfermedad de Alzheimer (EA), Demencia Vascular (DV) y Demencia Mixta (DM). Con puntajes Z se calculó estadística descriptiva y un ANOVA de medidas repetidas. Resultados: Se encontraron diferencias estadísticas en el rendimiento de la evaluación neuropsicológica entre los grupos. El 29 por ciento de la muestra fue EN que no presenta alteraciones objetivas de funciones cognoscitivas. El más alto porcentaje fue el 46 por ciento del grupo DCL, que mostraron alteraciones en memoria y atención. La EA con el 12 por ciento, presenta alteraciones severas en memoria, funciones ejecutivas y lenguaje. El 7 por ciento del grupo DV la atención, la visuoconstructivo, el cálculo y la coordinación motora fueron las funciones afectadas. Por su parte, en el perfil de DM que representa el 6 por ciento, mostro mayor severidad en las alteraciones cognoscitivas afectadas.

Introduction: During aging cognitive function processes may decrease and fluctuate. This makes the task of distinguishing between normal aging and pathological deterioration clinically difficult. Variables such as age, academic level and social demographics combine to impede an objective analysis. The goal of the study was to characterize the neuropsychological profile of Mexican senior citizens who expressed a subjective complaint regarding memory. Method: A sample of 536 people over the age of 60 was studied. Each had reported memory issues between2006 and 2010 at the Salvador Zubiran National Institute of Medical Science and Nutrition. For interdisciplinary consensus the sample was divided into: Normal Aging (NA), Slight Cognitive Deterioration (SCD), Alzheimer Disease (AL), Vascular Dementia (VA) and Mixed Dementia (MD). Z points were used to calculate ANOVA with repeated measurements. Results: The population yielded statistical differences stemming from neuropsychological evaluations. 29 percent of the sample were classified NA with no current objective alterations in cognitive functions. The largest group, 46 percent, were classified as SCD, manifesting some alterations in memory and attention. AL was found in 12 percent with severe alterations in memory, executive functions and language. A similar cognitive profile was shared with the 6 percent of the group with MD, with only difference in the severity of cognitive alterations. Those with a VA profile manifested affected functions for attention, visual construction, calculation and motor coordination.