Effect of endoscopic full-thickness resection assisted by distal serosal turnover with floss traction for gastric submucosal masses.

BACKGROUND: Complex and high-risk surgical complications pose pressing challenges in the clinical implementation and advancement of endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR). Successful perforation repair under endoscopy, thereby avoiding surgical intervention and postoperative complications such as peritonitis, are pivotal for effective EFTR. AIM: To investigate the effectiveness and safety of EFTR assisted by distal serosal inversion under floss traction in gastric submucosal tumors. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients with gastric and duodenal submucosal tumors treated with EFTR assisted by the distal serosa inversion under dental floss traction from January 2023 to January 2024 was conducted. The total operation time, tumor dissection time, wound closure time, intraoperative bleeding volume, length of hospital stay and incidence of complications were analyzed. RESULTS: There were 93 patients, aged 55.1 ± 12.1 years. Complete tumor resection was achieved in all cases, resulting in a 100% success rate. The average total operation time was 67.4 ± 27.0 min, with tumor dissection taking 43.6 ± 20.4 min. Wound closure times varied, with gastric body closure time of 24.5 ± 14.1 min and gastric fundus closure time of 16.6 ± 8.7 min, showing a significant difference (P < 0.05). Intraoperative blood loss was 2.3 ± 4.0 mL, and average length of hospital stay was 5.7 ± 1.9 d. There was no secondary perforation after suturing in all cases. The incidence of delayed bleeding was 2.2%, and the incidence of abdominal infection was 3.2%. No patient required other surgical intervention during and after the operation. CONCLUSION: Distal serosal inversion under dental-floss-assisted EFTR significantly reduced wound closure time and intraoperative blood loss, making it a viable approach for gastric submucosal tumors.

[Application of dental floss traction-assisted endoscopic submucosa dissection to rectal neuroendocrine neoplasm].

Objective: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of dental floss traction-assisted endoscopic submucosal dissection (DFS-ESD) for rectal neuroendocrine neoplasm (NEN). Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed. Clinical data of rectal NEN patients undergoing ESD at Endoscopy Center of Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University from January 2016 to December 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. Inclusion criteria: 1) age of 18 to 80 years old; 2) maximal diameter of lesions <1.5 cm; 3) tumor locating in the submucosa without invasion into the muscularis propria; 4) no enlarged lymph nodes around bowel and in abdominal cavity; 5) ESD requested actively by patients. A total of 37 patients were enrolled, including 23 male and 14 female cases with mean age of (56.0±11.3) years. All the lesions were single tumor of stage T1, and the mean size was 0.8±0.2(0.5-1.2) cm. Postoperative pathology revealed all samples as neuroendocrine tumors (NET). Seventeen patients received DFS-ESD treatment (DFS-ESD group) and 20 patient received conventional ESD treatment (conventional ESD group). In DFS-ESD group, after the mucosa was partly incised along the marker dots, the endoscopy was extracted, and the dental floss was tied to one arm of the metallic clip. When the endoscope was reinserted, the hemoclip was attached onto the incised mucosa; another hemoclip was attached onto normal mucosa opposite to the lesion in the same way. The submucosa was clearly exposed with the traction of dental floss and the resection could proceed. The conventional ESD group received the traditional ESD operation procedure. The operation time, modified operation time (remaining time after excluding the assembly time of dental floss traction in DFS-ESD group), en bloc resection rate, R0 resection rate, morbidity of operative complication, recurrence and metastasis were compared between two groups. Results: The average tumor size was (0.8±0.2) cm in DFS-ESD group and (0.7±0.2) cm in conventional ESD group (t=0.425, P=0.673). According to postoperative pathological grading of rectal neuroendocrine neoplasm, 13 were G1 and 4 were G2 in DFS-ESD group, while 17 cases were G1 and 3 cases were G2 in conventional ESD group without significant difference (P=0.680). There were no significant differences in baseline data between in the two groups (all P>0.05). All the basal resection margins were negative, the en bloc resection rate was 100% and the R0 resection rate was 100%. Pathological results showed tumor tissue close to the burning margin in 5 cases of conventional ESD group and in 2 cases of DFS-ESD group (P=0.416). The operation time was (17.9±6.6) minutes in conventional ESD group and (14.7±3.3) minutes in DFS-ESD group (t=1.776, P=0.084). The modified operation time of DFS-ESD group was (11.9±2.8) minutes, which was significantly shorter than (17.9±6.6) minutes in conventional ESD group (t=3.425, P=0.002). The hospital stay was (2.3±0.6) days and (2.0±0.5) days in conventional ESD group and DFS-ESD group, respectively, without significant difference (t=1.436, P=0.160). No patient was transferred to surgery, and no delayed bleeding or perforation occurred in either group. There was no recurrence or primary tumor-related death, and all the patients recovered well during a follow-up period of 14(1-24) months. Conclusion: Dental floss traction-assisted ESD for rectal neuroendocrine neoplasm can simplify operation and ensure negative basal margin.

Application of dental floss traction-assisted endoscopic submucosa dissection to rectal neuroendocrine neoplasm / 中华胃肠外科杂志

Objective@#To evaluate the safety and efficacy of dental floss traction-assisted endoscopic submucosal dissection (DFS-ESD) for rectal neuroendocrine neoplasm (NEN).@*Methods@#A retrospective cohort study was performed. Clinical data of rectal NEN patients undergoing ESD at Endoscopy Center of Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University from January 2016 to December 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. Inclusion criteria: 1) age of 18 to 80 years old; 2) maximal diameter of lesions <1.5 cm; 3) tumor locating in the submucosa without invasion into the muscularis propria; 4) no enlarged lymph nodes around bowel and in abdominal cavity; 5) ESD requested actively by patients. A total of 37 patients were enrolled, including 23 male and 14 female cases with mean age of (56.0±11.3) years. All the lesions were single tumor of stage T1, and the mean size was 0.8±0.2(0.5-1.2) cm. Postoperative pathology revealed all samples as neuroendocrine tumors (NET). Seventeen patients received DFS-ESD treatment (DFS-ESD group) and 20 patient received conventional ESD treatment (conventional ESD group). In DFS-ESD group, after the mucosa was partly incised along the marker dots, the endoscopy was extracted, and the dental floss was tied to one arm of the metallic clip. When the endoscope was reinserted, the hemoclip was attached onto the incised mucosa; another hemoclip was attached onto normal mucosa opposite to the lesion in the same way. The submucosa was clearly exposed with the traction of dental floss and the resection could proceed. The conventional ESD group received the traditional ESD operation procedure. The operation time, modified operation time (remaining time after excluding the assembly time of dental floss traction in DFS-ESD group), en bloc resection rate, R0 resection rate, morbidity of operative complication, recurrence and metastasis were compared between two groups.@*Results@#The average tumor size was (0.8±0.2) cm in DFS-ESD group and (0.7±0.2) cm in conventional ESD group (t=0.425, P=0.673). According to postoperative pathological grading of rectal neuroendocrine neoplasm, 13 were G1 and 4 were G2 in DFS-ESD group, while 17 cases were G1 and 3 cases were G2 in conventional ESD group without significant difference (P=0.680). There were no significant differences in baseline data between in the two groups (all P>0.05). All the basal resection margins were negative, the en bloc resection rate was 100% and the R0 resection rate was 100%. Pathological results showed tumor tissue close to the burning margin in 5 cases of conventional ESD group and in 2 cases of DFS-ESD group (P=0.416). The operation time was (17.9±6.6) minutes in conventional ESD group and (14.7±3.3) minutes in DFS-ESD group (t=1.776, P=0.084). The modified operation time of DFS-ESD group was (11.9±2.8) minutes, which was significantly shorter than (17.9±6.6) minutes in conventional ESD group (t=3.425, P=0.002). The hospital stay was (2.3±0.6) days and (2.0±0.5) days in conventional ESD group and DFS-ESD group, respectively, without significant difference (t=1.436, P=0.160). No patient was transferred to surgery, and no delayed bleeding or perforation occurred in either group. There was no recurrence or primary tumor-related death, and all the patients recovered well during a follow-up period of 14(1-24) months.@*Conclusion@#Dental floss traction-assisted ESD for rectal neuroendocrine neoplasm can simplify operation and ensure negative basal margin.

Clinical Values of Dental Floss Traction Assistance in Endoscopic Full-Thickness Resection for Submucosal Tumors Originating from the Muscularis Propria Layer in the Gastric Fundus.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) derived from endoscopic submucosal dissection has gradually been accepted and even promoted for the treatment of submucosal tumors (SMTs) originating from the muscularis propria (MP) layer. However, there are some difficulties when EFTR is used to treat MP lesions in the gastric fundus. This study intends to explore whether EFTR can be made simpler, safer, and more effective with the traction assistance of dental floss. METHODS: The clinical data of patients (trial group) with lesions in the MP layer in the gastric fundus undergoing EFTR with traction assistance of dental floss at Zhongshan Hospital, in 2016, were reviewed retrospectively. The control group was matched with the trial group according to tumor size. The differences in tumor resection time, patient hospitalization time, and complication rate were evaluated. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the average age of the two groups, each of which comprised 24 cases (58.7 ± 11.8 years versus 56.6 ± 7.9 years, t = 0.663, P = .511). However, there was a statistically significant difference in the operative time between the two groups (10.8 ± 2.8 minutes versus 19.0 ± 4.7 minutes, t = 7.298, P < .05). There was no statistically significant difference in the length of the postoperative hospital stay (3.2 ± 0.5 days versus 3.2 ± 0.5 days, t = 0.291, P = .772). In the trial group, there were 19 cases of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (group 1) and 5 cases of leiomyoma. The control group had similar results. Neither group experienced postoperative delayed bleeding, perforation, or other complications. CONCLUSIONS: When EFTR is used to treat SMTs originating from the MP in the gastric fundus, dental floss traction assistance can relieve the tumor boundary to simplify the surgical procedure and save the operation time.

Application of dental floss traction assisted technique in endoscopic submucosal dissection for early rectal cancer and precancerous lesions / 中国内镜杂志

Objective?To investigate the efficacy and safety of dental floss traction assisted technique in endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) of early rectal cancer and precancerous lesions.?Methods?57 patients recived ESD for early colorectal cancer and precancerous lesions from September 2014 to June 2017 were randomly divided into dental floss traction group (n = 28) and routine group (n = 29). To compare the average operation time, the amount of supplementary submucosal injection, and frequency of supplementary submucosal injection, complete resection rate, R0 resection rate, complications and follow-up results of the two groups.?Results?All 57 cases were treated with ESD successfully. The average operation time, the amount of supplementary submucosal injection and the frequency of injection were significantly less in the dental floss traction group than in the conventional group [(55.11 ± 10.44) vs (74.72 ± 14.47) min; (5.80 ± 1.80) vs (10.00 ± 5.70) ml; frequency (1.10 ± 0.90) vs (1.70 ± 0.90)]. The average operation time (P = 0.000), the amount of supplementary submucosal injection (P = 0.001) and the frequency of supplementary submucosal injection (P = 0.022) were significantly different between the two groups. The complete resection rate and R0 resection rate were 100.0% in both groups. There was no bleeding or perforation in the dental floss traction group, and 1 cases (3.4%) in the conventional group had delayed bleeding after operation, and 2 cases (6.9%) perforation occurred during the operation, and there was no significant difference between the two groups (P > 0.05). No recurrence was found in the two groups during follow-up period.?Conclusions?Dental floss traction assisted technique can significantly shorten the operation time of ESD, reduce the amount and frequency of supplementary submucosal injection and ensure good therapeutic effect for early colorectal cancer and precancerous lesions.