ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: This study aims to adapt and validate the Foot Health Status Questionnaire, developed by Bennett et al., in Portuguese patients with diabetic foot. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted with 143 patients with diabetic foot. A principal component analysis with oblique rotation and a confirmatory factor analysis using structural equation modeling were performed. RESULTS: The Portuguese version of the FHSQ (FHSQ-PT) in patients with diabetic foot remains equal to the original version, although with all factors correlated with each other. All scales presented high internal consistency values (pain: ω = 0.884; function: ω = 0.890; general foot health: ω = 0.910; and footwear: ω = 0.702), except for the footwear scale, although with a minimum acceptable coefficient. The FHSQ-PT scales showed good convergent validity and good discriminant validity. The FHSQ-PT scales were also able to discriminate between male and female patients as well as between patients with an active diabetic foot ulcer from those who did not. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the validated FHSQ-PT for Portuguese patients with diabetic foot showed good psychometric properties, being a useful, objective, and small instrument that may be used in clinical practice by health professionals without consuming too much time.
Diabetic foot ulcer has been consistently reported to be associated to lower health-related quality of life, impairing the patient's everyday function.Validated comprehensive measures that assess specific dimensions related to foot health in patients with diabetic foot are needed.The Portuguese version of the Foot Health Status Questionnaire (FHSQ-PT) showed good psychometric properties.FHSQ-PT is a useful short instrument that may be used to measure foot health status in clinical practice by health professionals who provide care to patients with diabetic foot.
ABSTRACT
Diabetic foot problems are among the most debilitating complications of diabetes mellitus. These problems incur significant economic costs and reduce quality of life. The integration of thermography technology in the screening and management of diabetic foot problems has been proven to be successful in recent years. By detecting changes in temperature, thermography helps identify early infections and assists in patient monitoring. These early successes have inspired more research and publications in this field. To date, a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of thermography-related research on diabetic foot using the Scopus database has not been conducted. This bibliometric analysis aims to fill this gap by reviewing the Scopus database from its inception until 2023 to examine the literature on thermography-related research on diabetic foot. A total of 342 articles met the selection criteria and were included in this analysis. The number of articles in this field remained low until the 2010s, when there was a sudden surge of interest that prompted numerous publications. Authors from the USA contributed the highest number of articles and had the greatest scholarly impact in this field. Despite the major contribution from the USA, there were numerous collaborations between various countries, underscoring the importance of international collaboration in advancing research and exchanging knowledge.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: No in-shoe systems, measuring both components of plantar load (plantar pressure and shear stress) are available for use in patients with diabetes. The STAMPS (STrain Analysis and Mapping of the Plantar Surface) system utilises digital image correlation (DIC) to determine the strain sustained by a deformable insole, providing a more complete understanding of plantar shear load at the foot-surface interface. RESEARCH QUESTIONS: What is the normal range and pattern of strain at the foot-surface interface within a healthy population as measured by the STAMPS system? Is STAMPS a valid tool to measure the effects of plantar load? METHODS: A cross-sectional study of healthy participants was undertaken. Healthy adults without foot pathology or diabetes were included. Participants walked 20 steps with the STAMPS insole in a standardised shoe. Participants also walked 10â¯m with the Novel Pedar® plantar pressure measurement insole within the standardised shoe. Both measurements were repeated three times. Outcomes of interest were global and regional values for peak resultant strain (SMAG) and peak plantar pressure (PPP). RESULTS: In 18 participants, median peak SMAG and PPP were 35.01â¯% and 410.6kPa respectively. The regions of the hallux and heel sustained the highest SMAG (29.31â¯% (IQR 24.56-31.39) and 20.50â¯% (IQR 15.59-24.12) respectively) and PPP (344.8kPa (IQR 268.3 - 452.5) and 279.3kPa (IQR 231.3-302.1) respectively). SMAG was moderately correlated with PPP (r= 0.65, p < 0.001). Peak SMAG was located at the hallux in 55.6â¯% of participants, at the 1st metatarsal head (MTH) in 16.7â¯%, the heel in 16.7â¯%, toes 3-5 in 11.1â¯% and the MTH2 in 5.6â¯%. SIGNIFICANCE: The results demonstrate the STAMPS system is a valid tool to measure plantar strain. Further studies are required to investigate the effects of elevated strain and the relationship with diabetic foot ulcer formation.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: To evaluate the association between diabetic foot disease (DFD) and the incidence of fatal and non-fatal events in individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) from primary-care settings. METHODS: We built a cohort of people with a first DFD episode during 2010-2015, followed up until 2018. These subjects were 1 to 1 propensity score matched to subjects with T2DM without DFD. The incidence of all-cause mortality, the occurrence of new DFD, amputations, cardiovascular diseases, or composite outcome, including all-cause mortality and/or cardiovascular events during the follow-up period, were calculated. A Cox proportional hazard analysis was conducted to evaluate the hazard ratios (HR) for different events. RESULTS: Overall, 11,117 subjects with T2DM with a first episode of DFD were compared with subjects without DFD. We observed higher incidence rates (IRs) for composite outcome (33.9 vs. 14.5 IR per 100 person-years) and a new DFD episode event (22.2 vs. 1.1 IR per 100 person-years) in the DFD group. Compared to those without DFD, those with a first episode of DFD had a higher HR for all events, with excess rates particularly for amputation and new DFD occurrence (HR: 19.4, 95% CI: 16.7-22.6, HR: 15.1, 95% CI: 13.8-16.5, respectively) was found. CONCLUSIONS: Although DFD often coexists with other risk factors, it carries an intrinsic high risk of morbidity and mortality in individuals with T2DM. DFD should be regarded as a severe complication already at its onset, as it carries a poor clinical prognosis.
Subject(s)
Amputation, Surgical , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Diabetic Foot , Propensity Score , Humans , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/mortality , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/diagnosis , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/epidemiology , Diabetic Foot/mortality , Diabetic Foot/diagnosis , Diabetic Foot/epidemiology , Male , Female , Retrospective Studies , Amputation, Surgical/mortality , Middle Aged , Risk Factors , Aged , Incidence , Risk Assessment , Time Factors , Prognosis , Cause of Death , Cardiovascular Diseases/mortality , Cardiovascular Diseases/diagnosis , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Severity of Illness IndexABSTRACT
AIMSWERNER SYNDROME IS A RARE PREMATURE AGEING AUTOSOMAL RECESSIVE DISORDER CAUSED BY PATHOGENIC VARIANTS IN THE WRN GENE. PEOPLE WITH WERNER SYNDROME MAY DEVELOP DIABETES MELLITUS. CHRONIC FOOT ULCERATION IS SEEN, WITH SOME CHARACTERISTICS OVERLAPPING WITH DIABETIC FOOT DISEASE. HOWEVER, THE CLINICAL COURSE OF THE ULCERATION IS ATYPICAL OF DIABETIC FOOT DISEASE. WE PRESENT FOUR SIBLINGS FROM AN IRISH TRAVELLER FAMILY WITH WERNER SYNDROME TO HIGHLIGHT THE COMPLEXITY OF THIS CONDITION. THE IRISH TRAVELLER POPULATION ARE AN INDIGENOUS, ENDOGAMOUS POPULATION IN WHICH CONSANGUINITY IS COMMON. AS A RESULT, RARE AUTOSOMAL RECESSIVE DISORDERS ARE PREVALENT AMONG THIS POPULATION: . METHODS: We describe our experience managing the complex foot disease seen in all four siblings. Foot complications present in the siblings include painful peripheral neuropathy, chronic foor ulceration, underlying osteomyelitis and acral melanoma. RESULTS: The cases are described individually, with a particular focus on the complex foot disease associated with the condition. CONCLUSIONS: Although the siblings attend a diabetic foot clinic, we suggest that the combination of clinical features seen in these cases is unique to Werner syndrome and warrants the title 'Werner Syndrome' (rather than 'Diabetic') foot.
Subject(s)
Diabetic Foot , Siblings , Werner Syndrome , Humans , Werner Syndrome/genetics , Werner Syndrome/complications , Werner Syndrome/diagnosis , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Adult , Diabetic Foot/diagnosis , Ireland , Melanoma/genetics , Melanoma/diagnosis , Melanoma/complications , Osteomyelitis/diagnosis , Osteomyelitis/genetics , Osteomyelitis/complications , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/genetics , Consanguinity , Foot Ulcer/genetics , Foot Ulcer/etiologyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Diabetic kidney disease favors diabetic foot ulcers, however we do not know whether the reverse relation exists. We investigated whether diabetic foot disease (DFD) related to an increased risk of developing renal events. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of a cohort of patients hospitalized for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) between 2009 and 2017, stratified for the risk of diabetic foot ulcer grades 0 (no risk), 1 and 2 (at risk), and 3 (DFD) according to the International Work Group on Diabetic Foot (IWGDF) classification. We highlighted new renal events (end-stage renal disease or a doubling of serum creatinine) in their medical records until December 2020. The relationship between DFD and later renal events was analyzed by multivariable Cox regression model. RESULTS: Among 519 patients, 142 (27 %) had a DFD at baseline, and 159 (30 %) were classified as Grades 1 or 2. Thirty-six renal events occurred during the 54 ± 27 months of follow-up: 19 subjects started dialysis, 1 had a renal transplantation, and 16 had a doubling of serum creatinine: 15 each in subjects with DFD and subjects at risk, versus 6 in subjects with Grade 0 DFD (logrank: P = 0.001). Adjusted for i) age and sex; ii) hyperglycemic exposure; iii) conventional cardiovascular risk factors; iv) renal parameters: and v) new diabetic foot ulcers during follow-up, DFD (HR 2.7 to 5.9) and being at risk of DFD Grades 1-2 (HR 2.8 to 5.1) were significantly related to new renal events. CONCLUSION: The risk of renal events was increased in people with T2DM and DFD.
Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Diabetic Foot , Diabetic Nephropathies , Humans , Diabetic Foot/epidemiology , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Longitudinal Studies , Retrospective Studies , Aged , Diabetic Nephropathies/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/epidemiology , Risk Factors , Kidney Failure, Chronic/epidemiology , Kidney Failure, Chronic/complications , Creatinine/bloodABSTRACT
Background: Few studies have explored long-term trends and risk factors for peripheral arterial complications in type 2 diabetes compared to the general population. Our research focuses on identifying optimal risk factors, their significance, risk associated with multifactorial risk factor control, and trends for these complications in diabetic patients versus general controls. Methods: This study included persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus entered into the Swedish National Diabetes Register 2001-2019 and controls matched for age-, sex- and county of residence. Outcomes comprised of extracranial large artery disease, aortic aneurysm, aortic dissection, lower extremity arterial disease and diabetes foot disease. Standardized incidence rates and Cox regression were used for analyses. Findings: The study comprises 655,250 persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus; average age 64.2; 43.8% women. Among persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus, the incidence rates per 100,000 person years for each non-coronary peripheral arterial complication event changed between 2001 and 2019 as follows: extracranial large artery disease 170.0-84.9; aortic aneurysm 40.6-69.2; aortic dissection 9.3 to 5.6; lower extremity artery disease from 338.8 to 190.8; and diabetic foot disease from 309.8 to 226.8. Baseline hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), systolic blood pressure (SBP), smoking status and lipid levels were independently associated with all outcomes in the type 2 diabetes mellitus cohort. Within the cohort with type 2 diabetes mellitus, the risk for extracranial large artery disease and lower extremity artery disease increased in a stepwise fashion for each risk factor not within target. Excess risk for non-coronary peripheral arterial complications in the entire cohort for persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus, compared to matched controls, were as follows: extracranial large artery disease adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 1.69 (95% confidence interval (CI), 1.65-1.73), aortic aneurysm HR 0.89 (95% CI, 0.87-0.92), aortic dissection HR 0.51 (95% CI, 0.46-0.57) and lower extremity artery disease HR 2.59 (95% CI, 2.55-2.64). Interpretation: The incidence of non-coronary peripheral arterial complications has declined significantly among persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus, with the exception of aortic aneurysm. HbA1c, smoking and blood pressure demonstrated greatest relative contribution for outcomes and lower levels of cardiometabolic risk factors are associated with reduced relative risk of outcomes. Funding: Swedish Governmental and the County support of research and education of doctors, the Swedish Heart-Lung Foundation and Åke-Wibergs grant.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: This study will explore the effectiveness of fish skin grafts (FSG) in ulcer healing in diabetic foot disease compared to standard of care (SOC). METHODS: The systematic review and meta-analysis were performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) standard. The electronic databases of PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science (WoS) internet were searched for the outcome rate of complete ulcer healing. The risk of bias assessment was conducted using the tool recommended by the Cochrane Collaboration. Statistical analysis included the individual and combined result of the studies, heterogeneity test, the effect size, sensitivity analysis, and publication bias tests. RESULTS: Five randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with a total of 411 patients were included in this study. This meta-analysis showed a higher rate of complete ulcer healing in groups receiving fish skin grafts (ORâ¯=â¯3.34, 95% CI 2.14-5.20, pâ¯<â¯0.01, I2 =â¯0%) compared to control groups. CONCLUSION: Fish skin grafts have been shown to be more effective for achieving complete ulcer healing compared to current conventional treatments in diabetic foot disease.
Subject(s)
Diabetic Foot , Fishes , Skin Transplantation , Wound Healing , Adult , Aged , Animals , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Chronic Disease , Diabetic Foot/diagnosis , Diabetic Foot/therapy , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Risk Factors , Standard of Care , Time Factors , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Lymphoedema is the gradual, abnormal build-up of lymph fluid in the tissues resulting from a failure of the lymphatic system. The swelling impedes movement and is painful. Compression garments are contraindicated and not tolerated by patients with extensive peripheral arterial disease. In this case study, simple lymphatic drainage was therefore considered a safer treatment option to reduce oedema and to encourage proactive self-management for a patient with bilateral amputations, diabetes and peripheral arterial disease.
Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Lymphedema , Peripheral Arterial Disease , Humans , Lymphedema/therapy , Edema/etiology , Edema/therapy , Lymphatic System , Peripheral Arterial Disease/complications , Peripheral Arterial Disease/therapyABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: This study will explore the effectiveness of autologous platelet-rich plasma in the treatment of diabetic foot disease compared to conventional treatments, based on the ulcer healing rate. METHODS: The electronic databases of PubMed, EMBASE, and WOS internet were searched. Evaluated outcome rate of complete ulcer healing. Statistical analysis was performed with RevMan 5.0 software and SPSS 25.0. RESULTS: Eleven RCTs with 828 patients were included in this study. The meta-analysis showed a higher complete ulcer healing rate (OR = 3.69, 95 % CI 2.62 to 5.20, P < 0.01, I2 = 0 %) in growth factors based in autologous platelech-rich plasma (aPRP) group compared with control. Mixed evidence was seen for publication bias, but analyses by using the trim-and-fill method did not appreciably alter results. CONCLUSION: Autologous platelet-rich plasma can improve the complete healing rate of the ulcer compared to current conventional treatments in diabetic foot ulcer patients.
Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Diabetic Foot , Platelet-Rich Plasma , Humans , Diabetic Foot/therapy , Research Design , Wound Healing , Outcome Assessment, Health CareABSTRACT
PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: Assessing the lower extremity arterial stenosis scores (LEASS) in patients with diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) is a challenging task that requires considerable time and efforts from physicians, and it may yield varying results. The presence of vascular wall calcification and other irrelevant tissue information surrounding the vessel can further compound the difficulties of this evaluation. Automatic detection of lower extremity arterial stenosis (LEAS) is expected to help doctors develop treatment plans for patients faster. METHODS: In this paper, we first reconstructed the 3D model of blood vessels by medical digital image processing and then utilized it as the training data for deep learning (DL) in conjunction with the non-calcified part of blood vessels in the original data. We proposed an improved model of vascular stenosis small target detection based on YOLOv5. We added Convolutional Block Attention Module (CBAM) in backbone, replaced Path Aggregation Network (PANET) with Bidirectional Feature Pyramid Network (BiFPN) and replaced C3 with GhostC3 in neck to improve the recognition of three types of stenosis targets (I: <50 %, II: 51 % - 99 %, III: completely occluded). Additionally, we utilized K-Means++ instead of K-Means for better algorithm convergence performance, and enhanced the Complete-IoU (CIoU) loss function to Alpha-Scylla-IoU (ASIoU) loss for faster reasoning and convergence. Lastly, we conducted comparisons between our approach and five other prominent models. RESULT: Our method had the best average ability to detect three types of stenosis with 85.40% mean Average Precision (mAP) and 74.60 Frames Per Second (FPS) and explored the possibility of applying DL to the detection of LEAS in diabetic foot. The code is available at github.com/wuchongxin/yolov5_LEAS.git.
Subject(s)
Deep Learning , Diabetes Mellitus , Diabetic Foot , Humans , Constriction, Pathologic , Diabetic Foot/diagnosis , Algorithms , Lower ExtremityABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Prompt referral of patients with diabetic foot ulceration (DFU) to specialist services can lead to more timely assessment of these patients and subsequent improved rates of limb salvage and patient outcomes. In this study we wanted to determine the impact of education in the primary care setting on onward referrals to our specialist Diabetic Foot multi-disciplinary team (MDT) clinic. METHODS: As part of a Diabetic Foot Roadshow, four teaching sessions were delivered in primary care settings across Shropshire by our specialist team from 17th March to the 25th May 2022. Attendees included podiatrists, tissue viability nurses, district nurses and wound care practitioners. Hospital records were used to identify all onward referrals to our Diabetic Foot MDT clinic in the weeks before and after delivery of the roadshow education sessions. RESULTS: 184 referrals were made to the diabetic foot clinic from January to July 2022. There were 0.3 referrals per day in the months prior to the commencement of the education sessions, compared to 1.5 referrals per day following the commencement of the teaching sessions. This increase in referrals was statistically significant (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Teaching sessions delivered to community specialist healthcare professionals significantly increase onward referral of patients to specialist services, facilitating more timely assessment and management of patients with DFUs.
Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Diabetic Foot , Humans , Diabetic Foot/diagnosis , Diabetic Foot/epidemiology , Diabetic Foot/therapy , Referral and Consultation , Educational StatusABSTRACT
Diabetic foot disease is a complex and challenging complication of diabetes mellitus, which imposes a significant burden of disease on patients, their carers, and the wider health systems. Recurrence rates are high, and current evidence indicates a high mortality associated with it. While management algorithms have primarily focused on the physical aspects of healing, there is increasing recognition of the critical role played by psychological and biomechanical factors in the development and resolution of diabetic foot disease. Therefore, in this paper, we aim to explore how diabetic foot outcomes can be improved by addressing not only the physical but also the psychological and biomechanical aspects that are integral to the development of this condition and its optimal resolution. We explore new technologies that allow for non-invasive objective assessment of the diabetic foot at risk, and we also explore the role of understanding biomechanics, which is essential to determining risk of foot disease, but also the potential for recurrence. In addition, we discuss the evidence linking depression and cognitive impairment to diabetic foot disease and offer our insight on the research direction required before implementing novel information into front-line clinics.
ABSTRACT
Objective The prevalence of diabetes and its complications are on the rise worldwide. This is particularly prevalent in low- and middle-income countries. The Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) is a measure of relative social deprivation. This index classifies England into small subsets called lower layer super output areas (LSOAs) and then ranks these LSOAs into deciles from the most deprived to the least deprived area. We used this to analyse the relationship between deprivation and outcomes in diabetic foot disease (DFD). Methods We evaluated patients admitted to our multidisciplinary unit with DFD over a five-year period. Their postal codes were used to classify these patients into IMD deciles with decile 1 representing the 10% of most deprived LSOAs and decile 10 the least deprived areas in the country. We used this classification to analyse the relationship between deprivation and its influence on surgical outcomes and lower limb amputation. We specifically compared those falling in the top five against the bottom five deciles. Results Our cohort consisted of 70 patients with diabetes who had surgery on their diabetic foot. Of this cohort, 33 (47%) of these underwent amputation. The majority of these procedures were minor amputations conducted on the forefoot (75.6%) and there were no below knee amputations. Of those requiring an amputation, 27 patients (81.8%) had an IMD decile of 5 or below, and only six (18.2%) patients had above 5. Conclusion Our study shows that the likelihood of amputations related to diabetic foot disease is inversely proportional to the index of multiple deprivation.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Cancer has been proposed as the primary cause of death in type 2 diabetes (T2D). The life expectancy is reduced after a diabetic foot ulcer. We investigated whether Diabetic Foot Disease related to an increased risk of developing a new cancer. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis on a cohort of patients hospitalized for T2D between 2009 and 2017, stratified for the risk of diabetic foot ulcer (International Working Group on Diabetic Foot classification). We highlighted new cancers in their medical records until December 2020. The relationship between Diabetic Foot Disease and later cancers was analyzed by multivariable Cox regression and survival curves were compared. RESULTS: Among 519 patients, 27% had a Diabetic Foot Disease, and 159 were classified as grades 1 or 2 (at risk). As compared to the 218 patients graded 0 according to the IWGDF, they were more men, older, with a longer duration of diabetes, more vascular complications, a greater incidence of insulin use, and a higher skin autofluorescence. During the 54 months of follow-up, 63 (12.1%) new cancers were diagnosed. Baseline Diabetic Foot Disease was significantly associated with a higher risk of cancer (multivariable adjusted Hazard ratio: 2.08, 95%CI: 1.02-4.25), whereas the relation was not significant for subjects at risk of DFU (HR: 1.65, 95%CI:0.81-3.35) CONCLUSION: The risk of cancer was increased twofold in T2D with Diabetic Foot Disease.
Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Diabetic Foot , Neoplasms , Humans , Male , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications , Diabetic Foot/epidemiology , Diabetic Foot/etiology , Diabetic Foot/diagnosis , Neoplasms/complications , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , FemaleABSTRACT
Introduction. Unplanned readmissions are common following discharge in patients after hospitalization for diabetic foot disease (DFD) complications. The aim of this study was to identify factors associated with readmissions in these high-risk patients, treated in a multidisciplinary setting and the implication of measures that could effectively reduce readmission rates. Methods. Patients presenting with DFDs admitted between 2015 and 2017 were studied retrospectively in a single-centre patient database. The demographics and clinical comorbidities were analyzed and comparison was made between 2 groups: patients readmitted within 30 days of discharge and those who did not require readmission. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify risk factors associated with readmissions. Results. In total, 340 patients were included. The unplanned readmission rate was 10.9%. More than half of readmissions (71%) were related to wound deterioration and infection. In the readmission group, the patients had lower body mass index, higher rate of osteomyelitis, lower rate of debridement, and evidence of peripheral vascular disease below the knee in the index admissions but these were not significant. In the multivariate analysis, peripheral neuropathy was the only significant risk associated with unplanned readmissions (odds ratio: 2.78, 95% confidence interval: 1.23-6.29, P = .014). Conclusion. This study demonstrates a significant association between peripheral neuropathy and unplanned readmissions. The implications of this nonmodifiable risk factor in reducing readmissions include all levels of patient care delivery such as adequate preparation for discharge and transition back into the community. Recognition and education in successful long-term offloading of insensate diabetic feet may help reduce rates of unplanned readmission.
ABSTRACT
AIMS: Data on the long-term consequences of diabetic foot disease (DFD) are scarce. We examined the association between DFD and major clinical outcomes in patients with diabetes in the general population. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort analysis of 1,428 participants with diabetes in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study. DFD and four clinical outcomes (nontraumatic lower-extremity amputation, cardiovascular disease, major fall, and death) were captured through 2018 using administrative data. We used Cox regression models to evaluate the association between incident DFD (modeled as a time-varying exposure) and the subsequent risk of clinical outcomes. RESULTS: During over two decades of follow-up (1996-1998 to 2018), the cumulative incidence of DFD was 33.3%. Risk factors for DFD included older age, poor glycemic control, long diabetes duration, and prevalent vascular disease (chronic kidney disease, retinopathy, cardiovascular disease). Following incident DFD, the five-year cumulative incidence of major clinical outcomes was 38.9% for mortality, 25.2% for cardiovascular disease, 14.5% for nontraumatic lower-extremity amputation, and 13.2% for major fall. DFD remained associated with all four clinical outcomes after multivariable adjustment, with hazard ratios ranging from 1.5 (cardiovascular disease) to 34.7 (lower-extremity amputation). CONCLUSIONS: DFD is common and confers substantial risk for major morbidity and mortality.
Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases , Diabetes Mellitus , Diabetic Foot , Hyperglycemia , Humans , Diabetic Foot/epidemiology , Diabetic Foot/surgery , Diabetic Foot/complications , Prospective Studies , Cardiovascular Diseases/complications , Risk Factors , Hyperglycemia/complicationsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to clarify any gender differences in the mortality risk of people with DFD since patients with diabetic foot disease (DFD) are at a high risk of mortality and, at the same time, are more likely to be men. METHODS: From regional administrative sources, the survival probability was retrospectively evaluated by the Kaplan-Meier method and using the Cox proportional-hazards model comparing people with DFD to those without DFD across the years 2011-2018 in Tuscany, Italy. Gender difference in mortality was evaluated by the ratio of hazard ratios (RHR) of men to women after initial DFD hospitalizations (n = 11,529) or in a cohort with prior history of DFD hospitalizations (n = 11,246). RESULTS: In both cohorts, the survival probability after DFD was lower among women. Compared to those without DFD, after initial DFD hospitalizations, the mortality risk was significantly (18%) higher for men compared to women. This excess risk was particularly high after major amputations but also after ulcers, infections, gangrene, or Charcot, with a lower reduction after revascularization procedures among men. In the cohort that included people with a history of prior DFD hospitalizations, except for the risk of minor amputations being higher for men, there was no gender difference in mortality risk. CONCLUSIONS: In people with DFD, the overall survival probability was lower among women. Compared to those without DFD after a first DFD hospitalization, men were at higher risk of mortality. This excess risk disappeared in groups with a history of previous DFD hospitalizations containing a greater percentage of women who were older and probably had a longer duration of diabetes and thus becoming, over time, progressively frailer than men.
ABSTRACT
The term 'diabetic foot disease' (DFD) often signifies the presence of foot ulceration and infection, but one must also be wary of the rarer occurrence of Charcot foot disease. The worldwide prevalence of DFD is 6.3% (95%CI: 5.4-7.3%). Foot complications present a major challenge to both patients and healthcare systems, with increased rates of hospitalisation and an almost trebled 5-year mortality. The Charcot foot often occurs in patients with long-standing diabetes, presenting as an inflamed or swollen foot or ankle, following unrecognised minor trauma. This review focuses on the prevention and early identification of the 'at-risk' foot. DFD is best managed by a multi-disciplinary foot clinic team consisting of podiatrists and healthcare professionals. This ensures a combination of expertise and provision of a multi-faceted evidence-based treatment plan. Current research using endothelial progenitor cells (EPC) and mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) offers a new dimension in wound management.
Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Diabetic Foot , Foot Diseases , Humans , Diabetic Foot/epidemiology , Diabetic Foot/therapy , Diabetic Foot/complications , Foot , Hospitalization , Risk Assessment , Foot Diseases/complicationsABSTRACT
Diabetes mellitus contributes to 15-25% of all chronic foot ulcers. Peripheral vascular disease is a cause of ischemic ulcers and exacerbates diabetic foot disease. Cell-based therapies are viable options to restore damaged vessels and induce the formation of new vessels. Adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs) have the potential for angiogenesis and regeneration because of their greater paracrine effect. Preclinical studies are currently using other forced enhancement techniques (e.g., genetic modification or biomaterials) to increase the efficacy of human ADSC (hADSC) autotransplantation. Unlike genetic modifications and biomaterials, many growth factors have been approved by the equivalent regulatory authorities. This study confirmed the effect of enhanced human ADSC (ehADSC)s with a cocktail of FGF and other pharmacological agents to promote wound healing in diabetic foot disease. In vitro, ehADSCs exhibited a long and slender spindle-shaped morphology and showed significantly increased proliferation. In addition, it was shown that ehADSCs have more functionalities in oxidative stress toleration, stem cell stemness, and mobility. In vivo, the local transplantation of 1.2 × 106 hADSCs or ehADSCs was performed in animals with diabetes induced by STZ. The ehADSC group showed a statistically decreased wound size and increased blood flow compared with the hADSC group and the sham group. Human Nucleus Antigen (HNA) positive cells were observed in some ADSC-transplanted animals. The ehADSC group showed a relatively higher portion of HNA-positive animals than the hADSC group. The blood glucose levels showed no significant difference among the groups. In conclusion, the ehADSCs showed a better performance in vitro, compared with conventional hADSCs. Additionally, a topical injection of ehADSCs into diabetic wounds enhanced wound healing and blood flow, while improving histological markers suggesting revascularization.