Discoid meniscus: Treatment considerations and updates.

A discoid meniscus is a morphological abnormality wherein the meniscus loses its normal 'C' shape. Although most patients are asymptomatic, patients might still present with symptoms such as locking, pain, swelling, or giving way. Magnetic resonance imaging is usually needed for confirmation of diagnosis. Based on a constellation of factors, including clinical and radiological, different approaches are chosen for the management of discoid meniscus. The purpose of this review is to outline the treatment of discoid meniscus, starting from conservative approach, to the different surgical options for this condition. The PubMed and Google Scholar databases were used for this review. Studies discussing the treatment of discoid meniscus from 2018 to 2023 were searched. Initially there were 369 studies retrieved, and after removal of studies using the exclusion criteria, 26 studies were included in this review. Factors such as stability, presence of tear, and morphology can help with surgical planning. Many approaches have been used to treat discoid meniscus, where the choice is tailored for each patient individually. Postoperatively, factors that may positively impact patient outcomes include male sex, body mass index < 18.5, age at symptom onset < 25 years, and duration of symptoms < 24 months. The conventional approach is partial meniscectomy with or without repair; however, recently, there has been an increased emphasis on discoid-preserving techniques such as meniscoplasty, meniscopexy, and meniscal allograft transplantation.

Excellent accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosis of discoid meniscus tears: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Purpose: The discoid meniscus (DM) is distinguished by its thickened, disc-shaped formation, which extends over the tibial plateau. The likelihood of developing osteoarthritis escalates if a DM tear remains undiagnosed and untreated. While DM tears can be diagnosed through arthroscopy, the high cost, invasive nature and limited availability of this procedure highlight the need for a better diagnostic modality. This study aims to determine the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in diagnosing DM tears. Methods: A systematic review was conducted to gather articles with at least 10 cases on the comparison of MRI and arthroscopy as the gold standard for DM tear diagnosis. Stata and MetaDisc were used to conduct the statistical analysis. The quality of the included studies was evaluated using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool. Results: Five diagnostic performance studies, derived from four original research papers involving 305 patients, were evaluated. Based on the pooled data, the sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio, positive limit of detection and negative limit of detection were found to be 0.87 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.82-0.91) and 0.84 (95% CI, 0.75-0.90), 32.88 (95% CI, 5.81-186.02), 5.22 (95% CI, 1.71-15.92) and 0.18 (95% CI, 0.09-0.38), respectively. A hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic curve with an area under the curve of 0.92 was generated. Conclusion: This meta-analysis demonstrates that MRI has excellent sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing DM tears. Despite its lower accuracy compared to arthroscopy, MRI can be used in symptomatic patients as a viable alternative to arthroscopy due to its inherent advantages. Level of Evidence: Level IV.

Patient-Reported Outcomes After Surgically Treated Anterior Horn Tears in the Pediatric Discoid Meniscus.

Background: As a subset of symptomatic discoid lateral meniscal (DLM) tears, anterior horn (AH) meniscal tears are not well studied in the pediatric population. There are even fewer studies reporting patient-reported outcomes after surgical treatment of AH tears in DLM. Purpose: To compare reported outcomes after surgical treatment of DLM tears involving the AH versus other locations in pediatric patients. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A retrospective review of prospectively collected patient data between 2013 and 2020 was conducted. Patients aged <18 years who underwent arthroscopic treatment of a symptomatic DLM were included. Pathology was classified as tears of the AH or tears not involving the anterior horn (NAH). Demographic data along with patient-reported outcome scores (Pediatric International Knee Documentation Committee [Pedi-IKDC] and Patient Assessment Questionnaire [PAQ]) were collected preoperatively through 24 months of follow-up. Results: A total of 41 patients were included (median age, 12.9 years; range, 7-17 years; 32% female, 68% male). The mean follow-up time for was 25 months (range, 8-58 months). There were 17 (41%) patients in the AH group and 24 (59%) patients in the NAH group. Of the AH group, 16 (94%) were treated with meniscal repair (vs menisectomy), while 19 (79%) of the NAH group were treated with meniscal repair. All patients achieved significant pre- to postoperative improvement on both the Pedi-IKDC and the PAQ. At 24-month follow-up, there were no differences between the AH and NAH groups on the Pedi-IKDC (92.51 vs 89.72; P = .18) or the PAQ (2.57 vs 2.61; P = .06). Conclusion: Patients who underwent meniscal repair for AH DLM reported positive postoperative outcomes.

Discoid Double-layered Lateral Meniscus: A Case Report.

Introduction: Abnormalities of the double-layered meniscus are rare and can be difficult to diagnose. The main pathology in this abnormality, which is predominantly seen in the lateral compartment, is an accessory meniscus lying over the normal meniscus. Anatomically, this structure can appear in different forms. Although other meniscal abnormalities associated with a double-layered meniscus have been reported, this case presents a previously undescribed type in the literature. Case Report: A 12-year-old girl presented to our clinic with complaints of knee locking and pain. When the patient underwent arthroscopy, an accessory incomplete discoid meniscus was found overlying the normal lateral meniscus. We performed an excision of the upper accessory meniscus and the patient had no problems during 3 years of follow-up after surgery. Conclusion: Abnormalities of the lateral meniscus are rare and can be difficult to diagnose. In cases where we suspect a meniscal abnormality, a proper arthroscopic examination should be performed and if a discoid meniscus is seen, it should be considered that this may be a double-layered meniscus.

The Role of Ultrasound in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Meniscal Injuries.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review evaluates the current understanding of the role of ultrasound in the diagnosis and treatment of meniscal disorders. RECENT FINDINGS: Ultrasound (US) demonstrates similar sensitivity and specificity when compared to magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of meniscal injuries when compared to arthroscopy. Meniscal extrusion (ME) under US can be a reliable metric to evaluate for meniscal root tears in knees with and without osteoarthritis (OA). Sonographic ME is associated with development of OA in knees without OA. US following allograft meniscal transplant may be useful in predicting graft failure. US findings can be used to screen for discoid menisci and may demonstrate snapping of a type 3 discoid lateral meniscus. Shear wave elastography for meniscal injuries is in its infancy; however, increased meniscal stiffness may be seen with meniscal degeneration. Perimeniscal corticosteroid injections may provide short term relief from meniscal symptoms, and intrameniscal platelet-rich plasma injections appear to be safe and effective up to three years. Ultrasound-assisted meniscal surgery may increase the safety of all inside repairs near the lateral root and may assist in assessing meniscal reduction following root repair. Diagnostic US can demonstrate with high accuracy a variety of meniscal pathologies and can be considered a screening tool. Newer technologies such as shear wave elastography may allow us to evaluate characteristics of meniscal tissue that is not possible on conventional imaging. US-guided (USG) treatment of meniscal injuries is possible and may be preferable to surgery for the initial treatment of degenerative meniscal lesions. USG or US-assisted meniscal surgery is in its infancy.

[Medial discoid meniscus in a pediatric patient. Case report and review of the literature]. / Menisco discoide medial en paciente pediátrico. Presentación de un caso y revisión de la literatura.

Discoid meniscus is a congenital morphological variant of the meniscus, which tends to occur more frequently in its lateral form than in the medial form. This anomaly is characterized by central hypertrophy of the meniscus and a larger diameter than the normal meniscus, resulting in an abnormal shape and greater coverage of the tibial plateau. The clinical presentation of this condition varies depending on the stability of the meniscus. In pediatric patients, in particular, it is common to experience progressive and atraumatic symptoms, such as pain and limited mobility. Diagnosis is based on imaging studies, with magnetic resonance imaging being the preferred tool, where the "bowtie sign" is a classic finding. Surgery is recommended for symptomatic patients, with a focus on preserving the peripheral portion of the meniscus. Saucerization is the most commonly used technique, followed by stability assessment to determine if additional procedures are required. In this case, a 9-year-old patient with a medial discoid meniscus presented symptoms following trauma. Despite this atypical presentation, a successful outcome was achieved through arthroscopic surgery, underscoring the importance of accurate diagnosis and proper management of this condition in pediatric patients. Understanding the anatomical and pathophysiological characteristics of the discoid meniscus is essential for an effective therapeutic approach.

El menisco discoide es una variante morfológica congénita del menisco, que suele presentarse con mayor frecuencia en su forma lateral que en la medial. Esta anomalía se caracteriza por la hipertrofia central del menisco y un diámetro mayor que el menisco normal, lo que resulta en una forma anormal y una mayor cobertura del platillo tibial. La presentación clínica de esta condición varía según la estabilidad del menisco. En pacientes pediátricos, en particular, es común experimentar síntomas progresivos y atraumáticos, como dolor y limitación de la movilidad. El diagnóstico se basa en estudios de imagen, siendo la resonancia magnética la herramienta preferida, donde el "signo del corbatín" es un hallazgo clásico. Se recomienda la cirugía para pacientes sintomáticos, con un enfoque en preservar la porción periférica del menisco. La saucerización es la técnica más utilizada, seguida de la evaluación de la estabilidad para determinar si se requiere un procedimiento adicional. En el presente caso, se describe a un paciente de nueve años con un menisco discoide medial que manifestó síntomas después de un traumatismo. A pesar de esta presentación atípica, se logró un resultado exitoso mediante una cirugía artroscópica, lo que resalta la importancia de un diagnóstico preciso y un manejo adecuado de esta condición en pacientes pediátricos. La comprensión de las características anatómicas y patofisiológicas del menisco discoide es esencial para un enfoque terapéutico efectivo.

Utility of Adult-Based Discoid Lateral Meniscus Diagnostic Criteria in a Pediatric Population.

Background: Commonly cited discoid lateral meniscus (DLM) imaging definitions are based on adult magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measurements. This pathology commonly presents in pediatric populations; however, whether accepted adult measurements reliably apply to children and adolescents is unknown. Purpose/Hypothesis: This purposes of the study were to determine (1) the utility of applying adult-accepted MRI definitions of DLM to pediatric patients, (2) whether sex differences affect the applicability of the criteria, and (3) whether MRI magnet strength and/or tear presence affect MRI measurements for diagnosing DLM in pediatric patients. It was hypothesized that MRI criteria for DLM would be similar in adults and pediatric patients. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A total of 100 consecutive MRIs from pediatric patients with DLM were evaluated, with 91 scans included. Two study authors independently reviewed the MRIs, evaluating meniscal height and width on sagittal and coronal images, "bow tie signs" on sagittal images, tibial sagittal and coronal width, and tear presence. For analysis, MRI magnet strength was dichotomized into high (>1.5 T) and low (<1.5 T) groups. Results: The mean age of the patients at MRI evaluation was 12.3 ± 3.4 years; 51% of the patients were male, and 56% of the scans were of left knees. Included patients with DLM showed a mean of 3.68 bow tie signs, a sagittal total anterior to posterior meniscal width/tibial width ratio of 73%, a coronal meniscal width/tibial width ratio of 30%, and a coronal, transverse width of the lateral meniscus at the midportion of the meniscal body of 20.6 ± 7.7 mm. The MRI tesla strength of the images included in this study ranged from 0.3 to 3. It was determined that high- versus low-resolution MRI scans did not affect the inter- or intraobserver reliability of the MRI measurments (P > .05). However, several measurements showed improved intraclass correlation coefficients with increased tesla strength. Conclusion: This study confirms that pediatric patients with DLM, diagnosed by board-certified pediatric sports medicine orthopaedic surgeons, have measurements on MRI consistent with adult DLM diagnostic criteria. This finding held true regardless of sex or MRI tesla strength. Pediatric patients with DLM had >3 bow tie signs, >70% sagittal tibial plateau coverage, >14 mm coronal width, and >20% coronal tibial plateau coverage on MRI.

[Progress on study of factors influencing the prognosis and complications of surgery for discoid meniscus injury in children].

The discoid meniscus is a common congenital meniscal malformation that is prevalent mainly in Asians and often occurs in the lateral discoid meniscus. Patients with asymptomatic discoid meniscus are usually treated by conservative methods such as observation and injury avoidance, while patients with symptoms and tears need to be treated surgically. Arthroscopic saucerization combined with partial meniscectomy and meniscus repair is the most common surgical approach., and early to mid-term reports are good. The prognostic factors are the patient's age at surgery、follow-up time and type of surgery. Some patients experience complications such as prolonged postoperative knee pain, early osteoarthritis, retears and Osteochondritis dissecans. The incidence of prolonged postoperative knee pain was higher and the incidence of Osteochondritis dissecans was the lowest. Retears of the lateral meniscus is the main reason for reoperation.

Progress on study of factors influencing the prognosis and complications of surgery for discoid meniscus injury in children / 中国骨伤

The discoid meniscus is a common congenital meniscal malformation that is prevalent mainly in Asians and often occurs in the lateral discoid meniscus. Patients with asymptomatic discoid meniscus are usually treated by conservative methods such as observation and injury avoidance, while patients with symptoms and tears need to be treated surgically. Arthroscopic saucerization combined with partial meniscectomy and meniscus repair is the most common surgical approach., and early to mid-term reports are good. The prognostic factors are the patient's age at surgery、follow-up time and type of surgery. Some patients experience complications such as prolonged postoperative knee pain, early osteoarthritis, retears and Osteochondritis dissecans. The incidence of prolonged postoperative knee pain was higher and the incidence of Osteochondritis dissecans was the lowest. Retears of the lateral meniscus is the main reason for reoperation.

Prevalence and a correlation analysis of discoid meniscus and femoral trochlear dysplasia.

BACKGROUND: Discoid meniscus (DM) and femoral trochlear dysplasia (FTD) are common knee disorders. Both as congenital malformation, whether there is a connection between them is unclear and the research on their prevalence in the general population is inadequate. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of FTD and DM in the general population through a large sample size, and to explore the relationship between them. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. METHODS: Patients undergoing knee magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations at our outpatient clinic were screened and 1003 patients were enrolled in DM group with 989 patients in non-DM (NDM) group. The type of DM and FTD was classified with Watanabe classification and Dejour's classification, respectively. The prevalence of FTD and DM in the general population and the relationship between them were evaluated. RESULTS: The prevalence of DM and FTD was 10.0% and 14.5%, respectively. The overall percentage of FTD was higher in DM group (P < 0.001). The DM group has a higher percentage of all types of FTD except type D (P < 0.05), and a higher percentage of both low- and high-grade FTD (P < 0.001). There were 633 cases of type I DM and 370 cases of type II DM. The overall percentage of FTD was not significantly different between the two types (P = 0.106). No significant difference was detected for all types of FTD except type B (P < 0.05). The Type I DM group has a significant higher percentage of high-grade FTD than Type II group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Patients with a DM are more likely to have FTD regardless of the type of DM, while those with a type I DM are more prone to have a high grade FTD.

Relationship Between Age and Pathology With Treatment of Pediatric and Adolescent Discoid Lateral Meniscus: A Report From the SCORE Multicenter Database.

BACKGROUND: Surgical treatment options of discoid lateral meniscus in pediatric patients consist of saucerization with or without meniscal repair, meniscocapular stabilization, and, less often, subtotal meniscectomy. PURPOSE: To describe a large, prospectively collected multicenter cohort of discoid menisci undergoing surgical intervention, and further investigate corresponding treatment of discoid menisci. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: A multicenter quality improvement registry (16 institutions, 26 surgeons), Sports Cohort Outcomes Registry, was queried. Patient characteristics, discoid type, presence and type of intrasubstance meniscal tear, peripheral rim instability, repair technique, and partial meniscectomy/debridement beyond saucerization were reviewed. Discoid meniscus characteristics were compared between age groups (<14 and >14 years old), based on receiver operating characteristic curve, and discoid morphology (complete and incomplete). RESULTS: In total, 274 patients were identified (mean age, 12.4 years; range, 3-18 years), of whom 55.6% had complete discoid. Meniscal repairs were performed in 55.1% of patients. Overall, 48.5% of patients had rim instability and 36.8% had >1 location of peripheral rim instability. Of the patients, 21.5% underwent meniscal debridement beyond saucerization, with 8.4% undergoing a subtotal meniscectomy. Patients <14 years of age were more likely to have a complete discoid meniscus (P < .001), peripheral rim instability (P = .005), and longitudinal tears (P = .015) and require a meniscal repair (P < .001). Patients ≥14 years of age were more likely to have a radial/oblique tear (P = .015) and require additional debridement beyond the physiologic rim (P = .003). Overall, 70% of patients <14 years of age were found to have a complete discoid meniscus necessitating saucerization, and >50% in this young age group required peripheral stabilization/repair. CONCLUSION: To preserve physiological "normal" meniscus, a repair may be indicated in >50% of patients <14 years of age but occurred in <50% of those >14 years. Additional resection beyond the physiological rim may be needed in 15% of younger patients and 30% of those aged >14 years.

Wrisberg variant of the lateral discoid meniscus in children: review of the literature and presentation of case series.

INTRODUCTION: The Wrisberg variant of the discoid lateral meniscus is a very rare disorder and is characterized by the hypermobility and instability of the meniscus caused by the absence of its posterior tibial attachment, with only its meniscofemoral junction (Wrisberg's ligament) maintained, and inserted in the posterior horn of the meniscus. As a result, the posterior horn of the lateral meniscus is mobile; often subluxing into the joint. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of eight skeletally immature patients with symptomatic Wrisberg variant of the discoid lateral meniscus were included in this study. Each knee was evaluated with MRI and arthroscopy. We graded unstable discoid menisci according to their discoid morphology (complete vs. incomplete), meniscal intra-substance degeneration, and the presence or absence of meniscal tears. All eight menisci were evaluated as degenerated with no meniscal tears. Five of them were evaluated as complete. Due to the severely degenerated meniscus, we considered it unnecessary to repair the detached posterior tibial ligament, so we performed a reshaping of the discoid meniscus, restoring a C-shape, excising the hypertrophied central part of the meniscus, and creating a posterior horn with a remaining rim of 6-8 mm. For evaluation of the knee function preoperatively and postoperatively we used the online International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) system. The purpose of this study is to emphasize the importance of MRI in identifying and revealing the unstable (Wrisberg variant) type of discoid meniscus in children. RESULTS: The mean patient age at the time of surgery was 8.25 ± 2.91 years (range 5-13 years). The average follow-up was 3.75 ± 0.46 years (range 3-4) years. The mean preoperative IKDC score was 22.37 ± 1.50 (range 21-25) points. The mean postoperative IKDC score was 80.50 ± 1.77 (range 79-84) points. CONCLUSIONS: MRI is a valuable tool in the evaluation of the shape, stability, and consistency of symptomatic discoid menisci. It is helpful for the detection of the unstable Wrisberg variant.

MRI Analysis of Knee Bony Morphology Variations in Children and Adolescents With Lateral Discoid Meniscus Compared With Asymptomatic Healthy Controls.

BACKGROUND: Lateral discoid meniscus accounts for most meniscal tears in children 10 years of age and younger. The role of bony morphology in discoid meniscus has been previously studied in a limited capacity using radiographs. PURPOSE: To use magnetic resonance imaging to measure features of the femoral condyles and tibial plateaus in patients with discoid meniscus to assess potential determinants of symptoms and subsequent surgery and to compare with matched controls to investigate age-related changes in bony features. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: After institutional review board approval, detailed morphology of the femoral condyles and tibial plateau was measured in 177 patients (3-18 years of age; 56% female) with confirmed lateral discoid meniscus. Measurements from 269 participants (3-18 years of age; 55% female) with asymptomatic knees were used as controls. Two-way analysis of variance with Holm-Sídák post hoc was used to compare measurements between discoid menisci and matched controls. Independent t tests were used to compare aspects of bony morphology within the discoid meniscus cohort. RESULTS: Compared with controls, patients with a lateral discoid meniscus had a larger bicondylar width and notch width (7- to 10-year-old and 15- to 18-year-old age groups; P < .05), larger tibial plateau width (11- to 14-year-old and 15- to 18-year-old age groups; P < .001), and smaller lateral (P < .02) and coronal (P < .02) tibial slopes across all age groups. Among patients with a discoid meniscus, larger bicondylar width, larger tibial plateau width, larger notch width, and a flatter lateral femoral condyle were associated with pain (P < .005) and lateral meniscal tears (P < .02). Larger notch width and notch width index were also associated with subsequent surgery (P < .05). CONCLUSION: There are clinically significant abnormalities in bony morphology in patients with a discoid meniscus, including larger femoral condyles and tibial plateaus and a flatter tibial plateau. Additionally, femoral size, femoral curvature, and tibial plateau size may influence the likelihood of knee pain, meniscal tear, and need for surgery. These findings highlight the importance of bony morphology in discoid meniscus pathophysiology in children and adolescents. Such measurements may also aid radiographic detection of discoid meniscus and guide decisions regarding the timing of potential surgical intervention.

Multiple Cases of Discoid Menisci within a Family: A Case Report and Literature Review.

Discoid menisci are thought to be heritable. However, few documented cases of this occurring within families exist. We present the case of siblings with lateral discoid menisci, documented by knee magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), reinforcing the case for the existence of familial discoid menisci. The children's father also reportedly had a discoid meniscus, but proof was unavailable due to his country of origin's poor record keeping. We put this into the context of other rare, reports of similar cases. Teaching Point: We present further case of discoid menisci occurring within families, a long-held belief with little concrete supporting evidence.

Medial Discoid Meniscus: A Rare Case Report.

The meniscus is a glossy white structure found in the knee between the femoral condyle and tibial plateau in the medial and lateral aspects of both knees. The main purposes of the meniscus are to enhance joint congruity and stability, transmit load, and absorb stress. A rare type of anomaly of the meniscus shape is called discoid meniscus, which presents as an atypical shape also known as disk cartilage. This report presents a 13-year-old male with a history of left knee pain after a fall. The pain was stabby in nature with a decrease in range of motion in the left knee and positive McMurray and Apley's tests on examination. The patient was treated by arthroscopic saucerization, and the procedure was successful. The patient had a good postoperative outcome after two months of follow-up.

Reliability of MRI Interpretation of Discoid Lateral Meniscus: A Multicenter Study.

Background: Discoid lateral meniscus (DLM) has a varied and complex morphology that can be challenging to assess and treat. Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is frequently used for diagnosis and surgical planning; however, it is not known whether surgeons are reliable and accurate in their interpretation of MRI findings when defining the pathomorphology of DLM. Hypothesis: Surgeons experienced in treating DLM are able to reliably interpret DLM pathology using MRI. Study Design: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Knee MRI scans from 44 patients (45 knees) were selected from a pool of surgically treated patients with DLM. Five reviewers (fellowship-trained pediatric sports medicine surgeons) performed independent review of each MRI scan using the PRiSM Discoid Meniscus Classification. Inter- and intraobserver reliability of the rating factors-primary (width, height, presence of peripheral instability or tear) and secondary (location of instability or tear, tear type)-was assessed using the Fleiss κ coefficient, designed for multiple readers with nominal variables (fair reliability, 0.21-0.40; moderate, 0.41-0.60; substantial, 0.61-0.80; excellent, 0.81-1.00). Reliability is reported as κ (95% CI). Results: Interobserver reliability in assessing most primary and secondary characteristics ranged from substantial (meniscal width) to moderate (peripheral instability, anterior instability, posterior instability, and posterior tear). Intraobserver reliability for most characteristics ranged from substantial (peripheral instability, presence of tear, anterior instability, posterior instability, and posterior tear) to moderate (meniscal width, anterior tear, and tear type). Notable exceptions were presence of tear, anterior tear, and tear type-all with fair interobserver reliability. Height had poor interobserver reliability and fair intraobserver reliability. Conclusion: Orthopaedic surgeons reliably interpret MRI scans using the PRiSM Discoid Meniscus Classification for the majority of DLM characteristics but vary in their assessment of height and presence and type of tear. MRI evaluation may be helpful to diagnose discoid by width and identify the presence of instability: 2 major factors in the decision to proceed with surgery. Arthroscopic evaluation should be used in conjunction with MRI findings for complete DLM diagnosis.

Meniscal rim instability has a high prevalence and a variable location.

INTRODUCTION: Most classification systems for lateral discoid meniscus do not evaluate instability of the meniscal peripheral rim. Considerable variability in the prevalence of peripheral rim instability has been published, and it appears that instability is underestimated. The purpose of this study was: first, to evaluate the prevalence of peripheral rim instability and its location in the symptomatic lateral discoid meniscus, and second, to investigate if patient age or type of discoid meniscus are possible risk factors for instability. METHODS: A cohort of 78 knees that underwent operative treatment due to symptomatic discoid lateral meniscus was analyzed retrospectively for the rate and location of peripheral rim instability. RESULTS: Out of the 78 knees, 57.7% (45) had a complete and 42.3% (33) had an incomplete lateral meniscus. The prevalence of peripheral rim instability in symptomatic lateral discoid menisci was 51.3%, and with 32.5%, the anterior attachment was most commonly affected, followed by the posterior (30%) and central (10%) attachment. 27.5% of the tested menisci were unstable anteriorly and posteriorly. There was no significant difference in the prevalence of rim instability between the type of discoid menisci (complete vs. incomplete), nor was there a significant correlation for age as a risk factor for instability. CONCLUSION: The discoid lateral meniscus has a high prevalence and variable location of peripheral rim instability. Meniscal rim stability must be tested and addressed cautiously in all parts and in all types of discoid lateral menisci during operative treatment.

Medial Discoid Meniscus in Children: A Multicenter Case Series of Clinical Features and Operative Results.

BACKGROUND: The discoid medial meniscus is a rare congenital anomaly of the knee. The literature is limited to small case series. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: Our purpose is to report the clinical manifestations and operative treatments of discoid medial menisci in children from multiple centers in North America. We hypothesized that symptoms and signs, arthroscopic findings, surgical treatments, and outcomes are similar to those for symptomatic discoid lateral menisci. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: A retrospective review identified patients with a diagnosed discoid medial meniscus confirmed at surgery across 8 children's hospitals between January 2000 and June 2021. The literature on discoid lateral menisci was reviewed and summarized for comparison. RESULTS: A total of 21 patients (9 female, 12 male) with 22 discoid medial menisci were identified. The mean ± SD age at the time of diagnosis was 12.8 ± 3.8 years. The most common symptoms and signs were locking and/or clunking, present in 12 of 22 knees (55%), similar to that reported in patients with discoid lateral menisci. Twelve discoid medial menisci were complete (55%); 8, incomplete (36%); and 2, indeterminate (9%). Tears were present in 13 knees, most commonly horizontal cleavage (54%). Five discoid medial menisci were unstable (23%): 3 for posterior tears and 2 for rim insufficiency. All 22 knees underwent arthroscopic saucerization, and of the 13 torn menisci, 7 (54%) were repaired. The median follow-up was 24 months (range, 2-82 months). Four knees underwent reoperation. All knees that required reoperation had undergone repair for a posteriorly located tear. There was a significant association between operative repair and need for reoperation (P = .0048). High rates of peripheral instability were also noted in case series of patients with discoid lateral menisci. CONCLUSION: Patient presentations and treatments for those with discoid medial menisci were similar to those reported for patients with discoid lateral menisci. Knees with discoid medial menisci also demonstrated instability attributed to peripheral insufficiency and posterior tears. Tears were present in over half of knees with discoid medial menisci, and reoperation was more common in knees that underwent repair of tears than those without repair.

Effect of the volume of resected discoid lateral meniscus on the contact stress of the tibiofemoral joint: A finite element analysis.

BACKGROUND: Partial meniscectomy is commonly performed for symptomatic patients with discoid lateral meniscus (DLM) if conservative treatment fails. However, the development of knee osteoarthritis and osteochondral lesion are detrimental postoperative complications. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of the volume of resected DLM on the contact stress of the tibiofemoral joint using a finite element analysis. METHODS: Subject-specific finite-element models of the knee joint of a patient with DLM were developed from computed tomographic and magnetic resonance images. To evaluate the effect of partial meniscectomy on the contact stress in the lateral tibiofemoral joint, six knee models were created in the study (the native DLM, and five partially meniscectomized DLMs (according to the preserved width of the meniscus: 12 mm, 10 mm, 8 mm, 6 mm, and 4 mm)). RESULTS: As the volume of resected DLM increased, higher contact stress was applied to the lateral tibiofemoral joint. Greater contact stress was applied to the preserved lateral meniscus than to the native DLM. CONCLUSIONS: From a biomechanical viewpoint, the native DLM was the most protective against lateral tibiofemoral contact stress in comparison to partially meniscectomized DLMs.

Arthroscopic Treatment of Symptomatic Discoid Lateral Meniscus and Nondiscoid Meniscus in Adolescent Patients.

BACKGROUND: Discoid lateral meniscus (DLM) is a rare condition. Patient-reported outcomes using validated instruments are underreported in the literature. DLM outcomes have not been directly compared with nondiscoid meniscus (non-DLM) in adolescent patients. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: This study sought to analyze the difference in patient characteristics, surgical treatment, and patient-reported outcomes for adolescent patients arthroscopically treated for symptomatic DLM and non-DLM pathology. We hypothesized that DLM and non-DLM patient-reported outcomes would be similar. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients aged <18 years with symptomatic DLM and non-DLM pathology was completed between 2015 and 2021 at a single academic institution. Chart reviews for patient characteristics and surgical operative indications and technique were completed. Patient-reported outcome scores were prospectively collected preoperatively and at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after surgery. RESULTS: Patients in the DLM group (n = 48), when compared with the non-DLM group (n = 45), were younger (12.71 vs 15.78 years, respectively; P < .001) and had lower body mass index (24.53 vs 28.91, respectively; P < .02). Both groups were majority Hispanic and more commonly male (DLM 65% vs non-DLM 60%). All of the DLM patients had surgery on the lateral discoid meniscus (n = 48), whereas the non-DLM group had surgery on the lateral meniscus (n = 37), medial meniscus (n = 7), or both (n = 1). A majority of patients in both groups underwent meniscal repair (DLM 73% and non-DLM 62%), and there was no difference in surgical treatment between groups (P > .05). A statistically significant improvement was seen in International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Physical Activity Questionnaire (PAQ) scores from the preoperative assessment to 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after surgery for both DLM and non-DLM groups (P < .05). No difference was found in scores between DLM and non-DLM groups, between sexes, or between age groups (<13 years or ≥13 years) (P > .05). CONCLUSION: Although patients with DLM were younger and had lower body mass index, the IKDC and PAQ scores were not significantly different between the DLM and non-DLM groups. Both groups showed a significant improvement in scores relative to their preoperative scores. Sex and age did not affect IKDC or PAQ scores.