Tumour budding in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: A novel prognosis risk factor.

INTRODUCTION: Most cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas (cSCC) have a good prognosis, there is a small group where metastasis and death occur and the evaluation of this risk is still cause for controversy. Tumour budding is a pattern of histological invasion that is an emerging risk factor in other solid tumours. OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between tumour budding and other known high-risk predictors in cSCC. In addition, the impact of tumour budding on overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) was analysed. METHOD: Retrospective study. It included patients with a diagnosis of non-genital cSCC by excisional biopsy at a university hospital, between 2010 and 2020. A pathologist re-analysed their histological slides and evaluated budding. Univariate and multivariate analyses were made to study the associations. RESULTS: 156 cSCC biopsies were found, and positive tumour budding was found in 13.5%. This correlated with worse DSS and OS. On univariate analysis, budding was correlated with the diameter, thickness of the tumour, histological grade, level of invasion, perineural and lymphovascular invasion, previous radiotherapy, recurrent tumours and lymph node metastasis (LNM). Multivariate analysis: tumour budding was associated with poorly differentiated tumours, prior radiotherapy and LNM. CONCLUSION: An association was found between tumour budding and most known risk factors in cSCC. We found findings that indicate that the presence of tumour budding is associated with a worse prognosis in terms of LNM, OS and DSS. This supports the results of previous work which has suggested that budding could be related to high-risk cSCC.

Prognostic significance of sentinel node biopsy status in cutaneous melanoma: a 21-years prospective study from a single institution.

AIM: To analyze the accuracy of the sentinel lymphatic node biopsy (SLNB) and to investigate predictive factors for sentinel node (SN) status and prognostic factors for recurrence-free survival (RFS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) in patients with melanoma. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between June 1997 and June 2017, 440 consecutive patients, who underwent SLNB by a single surgical team, were prospectively included. Descriptive and survival analysis were performed. RESULTS: 119 of 440 patients (26%) had positive SN. SLNB's false-negative rate was 6.3%. Breslow thickness, Clark´s level, ulceration and histological subtype were statistically significant predictive factors of SN metastases. In a multivariate analysis, positive SN (HR = 2.21, p = 0.01), deeper Breslow thickness (HR = 2.05, p = 0.013), male gender (RR = 2.05, p = 0.02), and higher Clark's level (HR = 2.30, p = 0.043) were significantly associated with decreased RFS; and positive SN (HR = 2.58, p < 0.001), deeper Breslow thickness (HR = 2.57, p = 0.006) and male gender (HR = 1.93, p = 0.006) were associated with lower DSS. CONCLUSION: SLNB is a reliable and reproducible procedure with high sensitivity (93.7%). Positive SN metastases, Breslow thickness and male gender were statistically associated with poorer outcomes. Male gender was an independent prognostic factor of tumor thickness or SN status.

Quality of life in mucopolysaccharidoses: construction of a specific measure using the focus group technique.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the perceptions of patients, their caregivers, and their healthcare providers to the development of a new specific instrument for assessment of the quality of life (QoL) in patients with mucopolysaccharidoses (MPS) using a qualitative focus group (FG) design. FGs were held in two Brazilian states (Rio Grande do Sul and Rio de Janeiro). RESULTS: Three versions of the new instrument were developed, each for a different age group: children (age 8-12 years), adolescents (age 13-17), and adults (age ≥ 18). The FGs mostly confirmed the relevance of items. All FGs unanimously agreed on the facets: School, Happiness, Life Prospects, Religiosity, Pain, Continuity of Treatment, Trust in Treatment, Relationship with Family, Relationship with Healthcare Providers, Acceptance, and Meaning of Life. The overall concept of QoL (as proposed by the WHO-World Health Organization) and its facets apply to this patient population. However, other specific facets-particularly concerning clinical manifestations and the reality of the disease-were suggested, confirming the need for the development of a specific QoL instrument for MPS.

Assessment of prognosis in patients with stage II colon cancer / Avaliação o prognóstico de pacientes com cancer de colon no estadio II

Pathologic staging is currently the most important prognostic factor in colon cancer, although individually this procedure does not provide a complete clinical outcome. This study aimed to determine the disease-specific survival of patients with colon cancer treated in the Braga Hospital from January 2005 to December 2013, according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer, 6th edition, and the disease-free survival and disease- specific survival of high- and low-risk stage II patients, whether in use, or not, of adjuvant chemotherapy. We obtained a total sample of 578 patients, with 145 and 65 high- and low-risk stage II patients, respectively. We observed a 5-year disease-specific survival rate of 93%, 27.4% and 75% for stage IIA, IIB and IIIA patients, respectively, where IIIA and IIB present statistically significant differences (p = 0.001). In high-risk stage II patients, disease-free survival (p = 0.107) and disease-specific survival (p = 0.037) were higher in the group submitted to chemotherapy. In low- risk patients, disease-free survival was higher in the group submitted to chemotherapy (p = 0.494), while disease-specific survival was lower (p = 0.426). The differences observed between stage IIB and IIIA survival can be explained by the consensual use of adjuvant chemotherapy in stage IIIA, and by its controversial use in stage IIB. Adjuvant chemotherapy showed to be effective only in high-risk stage II patients in terms of disease-specific survival. In the future, other markers, namely molecular ones, may be used to stratify the risk of stage II patients and determine who will benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. (AU)

O estadiamento patológico é, atualmente, o fator de prognóstico mais importante do câncer de cólon, embora individualmente não preveja totalmente o resultado clínico. Neste estudo, pretendeu-se determinar a sobrevivência para uma doença específica (SDE) dos pacientes com câncer de cólon tratados no Hospital de Braga entre janeiro de 2005 e dezembro de 2013, de acordo com a 6a edição da American Joint Committee on Cancer e a Sobrevivência Livre de Doença (SLD) e SDE dos doentes em estadio II, classificados em alto e baixo risco, de acordo com a realização ou não de quimioterapia adjuvante. Obtivemos uma amostra total de 578 pacientes, dos quais uma parcela pertencia ao estadio II de alto ou de baixo risco (145 e 65 pacientes, respetivamente). Observamos SDE a 5 anos de: 93%, 27,4% e 75% para os estadios IIA, IIB e IIIA, respetivamente; IIIA e IIB apresentaram diferenças significativas (p = 0,001). SLD (p = 0,107) e SDE (p = 0,037) para o estadio II de alto risco foram superiores no grupo tratado com quimioterapia. Nos doentes de baixo risco, SLD foi superior no grupo tratado com quimioterapia (p = 0,494), enquanto que SDE foi inferior (p = 0,426). As diferenças de sobrevivência observadas para os estadios IIB e IIIA podem se dever ao uso controverso da quimioterapia em IIB e ao uso consensual em IIIA. O uso da quimioterapia adjuvante demonstrou ser efetivo nos doentes em estadio II de alto risco em termos de SDE. Futuramente, outros marcadores, nomeadamente moleculares, poderão vir a ser uti- lizados para estratificar o risco do estadio II e definir quem se beneficiará com o tratamento adjuvante. (AU)