Prevalencia y factores sociodemográficos asociados a la ambliopía en población preescolar / Prevalence and sociodemographic factors associated with amblyopia in preschool children

Objetivo: estimar la prevalencia de la ambliopía y su tratamiento en niños de preescolar de la provincia de Alicante (España) durante un periodo de larga duración, así como la influencia de diferentes factores sociodemográficos. Material y método: estudio observacional descriptivo transversal (2002-2015) mediante protocolo de detección de ambliopía validado (sensibilidad 89,3%; especificidad 93,1%) en niños escolarizados de 4 a 6 años. La variable principal fue la clasificación, de los 140 102 niños examinados, según el resultado de las pruebas (“normales”, “sospechosos de patología” o en “tratamiento previo”) y las variables explicativas: edad, sexo, curso escolar, tipo de gestión del colegio y su ubicación. Resultados: la prevalencia de niños con sospecha de ambliopía osciló significativamente, entre los cursos escolares, desde 8,54% hasta 23,9% (p = 0,00000). Los niños de 6 años presentaron valores de sospecha de ambliopía notablemente más altos (16,68%; p = 0,00000) y los niños matriculados en colegios privados, los más bajos (8,05%; p = 0,00000). La probabilidad de que un niño “no-normal” estuviera ya tratado aumentaba con la edad (OR 2,06; p <0,001) y con el hecho de asistir a un colegio privado (OR 1,56; p = 0,001). Conclusiones: la prevalencia de la sospecha de ambliopía fue alta en el área de estudio, siendo los niños de mayor edad y los niños pertenecientes al grupo de nivel socioeconómico más bajo los de mayor riesgo. Los programas de cribado escolar para la detección temprana de la ambliopía son recomendados para aumentar y equiparar la probabilidad de acceso al tratamiento, reduciendo así la prevalencia y la gravedad de la ambliopía en niños (AU)

Objective: to estimate the prevalence of amblyopia and its treatment in preschool children in the province of Alicante over a long time period, and assess the influence of different sociodemographic factors.Methods: cross-sectional descriptive observational study (2002-2015) using a validated amblyopia detection protocol (sensitivity, 89.3%; specificity, 93.1%) in preschool children aged 4 to 6 years. The primary outcome was the classification of the 140 102 examined children based on the test results ('normal', 'suspected amblyopia' or 'in treatment') and the explanatory variables: age, sex, school year, private/public ownership of school and school location.Results: the prevalence of children with suspected amblyopia varied significantly between school years, ranging from 8.54% to 23.9% (p=0.00000). The prevalence of suspected amblyopia was significantly higher in children aged 6 years (16.68%; p=0.00000) and lowest in those attending private schools (8.05%; p=0.00000). The probability that a child with abnormal results was already in treatment increased with age (OR 2.06; p<0.001) and with enrolment in a private school (OR 1.56; p=0.001).Conclusions: the prevalence of suspected amblyopia was high in the study area, with a higher risk in older children and children in to the lowest socioeconomic status group. School-based screening programs for early detection of amblyopia are recommended to increase and equalize access to treatment, thereby reducing the prevalence and severity of amblyopia in children. (AU)

Prevalence of correctable visual impairment in primary school children in Qassim Province, Saudi Arabia.

PURPOSE: The worldwide prevalence of refractive errors (RE), which is a common cause of treatable visual impairment among children, varies widely. We assessed the prevalence of correctable visual impairment (uncorrected RE) in primary school children in Qassim, Saudi Arabia. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted in 21 primary schools. A total of 5176 children (mean age 9.5±1.8 years), 2573 boys (49.7%) and 2603 girls (50.3%), underwent a comprehensive eye examination. The examinations consisted of visual acuity, autorefraction, cover test, ocular motility, pupillary evaluation, anterior segment examination, cycloplegic auto-refraction and dilated fundus examination with direct ophthalmoscopy. The children were divided into groups based on their age and gender. RESULTS: The overall prevalence of RE in the better eye was 18.6% (n=963), and the prevalence of uncorrected RE 16.3% (n=846), with only 2.3% (n=127) of children wearing spectacles during examination. The prevalence of uncorrected myopia (5.8%) and myopic astigmatism (5.4%) was higher compared to that of hyperopic astigmatism (2.7%), mixed astigmatism (1.7%) and hyperopia (0.7%). The anisometropia prevalence was 3.6%. Risks for astigmatism, myopia and anisometropia were positively associated with age. In addition, myopia and anisometropia risks were also associated with female gender, while risk of astigmatism was correlated with male gender. Few children with vision reducing RE wore spectacles; an additional 16.3% of children could benefit from spectacle prescription. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of uncorrected RE in children is relatively high and represents an important public health problem in school-aged children in Qassim province. Performance of routine periodical vision screening throughout childhood may reverse this situation.