[Dispensing Service: An Essential Service Provided by Community Pharmacy to Enhance Patient Safety. A Case Study]. / Servicio de Dispensación: un servicio esencial brindado desde la Farmacia Comunitaria que permite reforzar la Seguridad del Paciente. A propósito de un caso.

A 38-year-old patient diagnosed with asthma and anxiety, who takes two medications (salbutamol 100 mcg inhaler (2 puffs every 6 hours), and diazepam 5 mg (0-0-1), visited the Community Pharmacy to pick up a treatment prescribed by the Primary Care Physician (PCP) following a diagnosis of anxious-depressive symptoms.During the Dispensing Service, a potential Drug-Related Problem (DRP) of prescription error is detected, which could be related with a Negative Outcomes Releated to Medicines (NOM) due to the concurrent use of desvenlafaxine and mirtazapine. Additionally, a Health Problem (HP)-related DRP was detected, as the proposal to discontinue the use of diazepam could result in an Insufficiently Treated HP, potentially leading to a NOM of Treatment Necessity due to the risk of worsening anxiety episodes.From de Community Pharmacy, a report was prepared with recommendations that were accepted by the PCP. Subsequent case monitoring revealed an improved management of the patient's health problems, as well as the resolution of the identified DRP and NOM. This ensured a rational, safe, and effective use of the medication.

Servicio de Dispensación: un servicio esencial brindado desde la Farmacia Comunitaria que permite reforzar la Seguridad del Paciente. A propósito de un caso / Dispensing Service: An Essential Service Provided by Community Pharmacy to Enhance Patient Safety. A Case Study

Paciente de 38 años, diagnosticado de asma y ansiedad que utilizaba 2 medicamentos (salbutamol 100 mcg inhalador (2 pulv. cada 6 horas) y diazepam 5 mg (0-0-1)), acude a la Farmacia Comunitaria (FC) para retirar un tratamiento prescrito por el Médico de Atención Primaria (MAP) tras diagnóstico de un cuadro ansioso-depresivo. Desde el Servicio de Dispensación (SD) se detectó un Problema Relacionado con el Medicamento (PRM) de un potencial error en la prescripción, que podría tener asociado un Resultado Negativo asociado a la Medicación (RNM) ante uso concomitante de desvenlafaxina y mirtazapina, así como un PRM de Problema de Salud (PS) insuficientemente tratado ante una propuesta de suspensión de uso de diazepam, que podría derivar en un RNM de Necesidad de Tratamiento ante el riesgo de empeoramiento de episodios de ansiedad. Desde la FC, se elaboró un informe de derivación con recomendaciones que fueron aceptadas por el MAP. Se llevó a cabo un seguimiento del caso que permitió realizar un mejor control de los PS presentados por el paciente, así como la resolución de los PRM y RNM detectados, garantizando así un uso racional, seguro y eficaz del medicamento. (AU)

A 38-year-old patient diagnosed with asthma and anxiety, who takes two medications (salbutamol 100 mcg inhaler (2 puffs every 6 hours), and diazepam 5 mg (0-0-1), visited the Community Pharmacy to pick up a treatment prescribed by the Primary Care Physician (PCP) following a diagnosis of anxious-depressive symptoms. During the Dispensing Service, a potential Drug-Related Problem (DRP) of prescription error is detected, which could be related with a Negative Outcomes Releated to Medicines (NOM) due to the concurrent use of desvenlafaxine and mirtazapine. Additionally, a Health Problem (HP)-related DRP was detected, as the proposal to discontinue the use of diazepam could result in an Insufficiently Treated HP, potentially leading to a NOM of Treatment Necessity due to the risk of worsening anxiety episodes. From de Community Pharmacy, a report was prepared with recommendations that were accepted by the PCP. Subsequent case monitoring revealed an improved management of the patient’s health problems, as well as the resolution of the identified DRP and NOM. This ensured a rational, safe, and effective use of the medication. (AU)

A Qualitative Approach to Exploring Workflow and Cost Factors of Dispensing Services in Community Pharmacies in Taiwan.

Purpose: This study aimed to thoroughly document the process and cost factors involved in dispensing services within a community pharmacy. Methods: Using a cross-sectional design, this study incorporated a pragmatic and descriptive qualitative approach to outline pharmacists' viewpoints on providing dispensing services in community settings. A purposive sampling was employed to recruit pharmacists from geographically different community pharmacies, spanning from March to July 2022. Semi-structured interviews with direct content analysis were conducted through face-to-face interactions to gather firsthand insights into pharmacists' professional dispensing services. The data underwent analysis through descriptive and in vivo coding techniques to categorize, define, and label themes, thereby identifying key steps and cost components in the prescription dispensing process. The qualitative data management software, MAXQDA 2020, was utilized for data management and maintenance. Results: Ten community pharmacists participated in the study, cooperatively completing the interview process. Of these, 7 were male and 3 were female, with age ranging from 29 to 62 years. The average length of pharmacy practice experience was 11.4 years. The study revealed six integral steps in the dispensing process: (1) receiving and clarifying legality and completeness of prescriptions, (2) profiling and verifying patient prescriptions, (3) preparing prescription labels and containers, (4) dispensing right medications with right quantity, (5) inspecting dispensing accuracy, (6) handing over medications and providing counseling. Along with these processes, pharmacists emphasized that pharmacy manpower, representing a substantial portion of the associated costs, determines the success and quality of the dispensing service. Additionally, rental, utilities, consumables, and physical equipment were identified as other important cost factors associated with carrying out pharmacy dispensing services. Conclusion: The study offers a comprehensive understanding of the dispensing service workflow within community pharmacies. The findings may inform key stakeholders and policymakers about required resources for enhancing and sustaining quality dispensing services for the public in Taiwan.

Seguridad del paciente durante el servicio de dispensación en farmacia comunitaria ante un error de prescripción. A propósito de un caso / Patient safety during the dispensing service in a community pharmacy in the event of a prescription error. About a case

Paciente de 63 años, diagnosticada de diabetes, hipertensión e hipercolesterolemia, con antecedentes de infarto de miocardio, que toma 9 medicamentos. Acude a la farmacia comunitaria (FC) para retirar el tratamiento prescrito desde el Servicio de Urgencias para tratar una conjuntivitis. Desde el servicio de dispensación se detecta un Problema Relacionado con el Medicamento (PRM) de un potencial error en la prescripción, que podría tener asociado un Resultado Negativo a la medicación (RNM) al prescribirse gotas óticas para uso oftálmico, comprometiendo la seguridad de la paciente. Se deriva al Servicio de Urgencias para modificación del tratamiento por considerarse un potencial riesgo, siguiendo indicaciones de Ficha Técnica. En el Servicio de Urgencias se rechaza la intervención propuesta y se remite de nuevo a la paciente a FC a retirar el fármaco. La paciente decide esperar dos días a una cita médica presencial con su Médico de Atención Primaria (MAP). La propuesta realizada desde la FC fue aceptada por el MAP. Se realiza seguimiento del caso, que permite constatar la resolución del problema de salud, así como los PRM y RNM detectados, logrando una mejora en la salud del paciente y garantizando así un uso racional, seguro y eficaz del medicamento (AU)

A 63-year-old patient, diagnosed with diabetes, hypertension, and hypercholesterolemia, with myocardial infarction background who takes 9 different medications. She goes to the Community Pharmacy (CP) to pick up the prescribed treatment from the Emergency Department to treat a diagnosed conjunctivitis. During the Dispensing Service, a potential Drug-Related Problem (DRP) of prescription error is detected, which could be related with a Negative Outcomes Related to Medicines (NOM) when prescribing ear drops for ophthalmic use, compromising patient safety . The patient was referred to the Emergency Department to modify the treatment due to a potential risk, following the indications of the Summary of products Characteristics (SmPC). In the Emergency Department, the proposed intervention was rejected and the patient was sent back to withdraw the drug again to the CP. The patient decides to wait two days for a face-to-face medical appointment with her Primary Care Physician (MAP). The proposal made by the FC was accepted by the General Practitioner (GP). Follow-up of the case is carried out, which allows verifying the resolution of the Health Problem as well as the DRP and NRM detected, achieving an improvement in the patient’s health and thus guaranteeing rational, safe and effective use of the medication (AU)

[Patient safety during the dispensing service in community pharmacies in the event of a prescribing error. A case report]. / Seguridad del paciente durante el servicio de dispensación en farmacia comunitaria ante un error de prescripción. A propósito de un caso.

A 63-year-old patient, diagnosed with diabetes, hypertension, and hypercholesterolemia, with myocardial infarction background who takes 9 different medications. She goes to the Community Pharmacy (CP) to pick up the prescribed treatment from the Emergency Department to treat a diagnosed conjunctivitis.During the Dispensing Service, a potential Drug-Related Problem (DRP) of prescription error is detected, which could be related with a Negative Outcomes Related to Medicines (NOM) when prescribing ear drops for ophthalmic use, compromising patient safety .The patient was referred to the Emergency Department to modify the treatment due to a potential risk, following the indications of the Summary of products Characteristics (SmPC). In the Emergency Department, the proposed intervention was rejected and the patient was sent back to withdraw the drug again to the CP. The patient decides to wait two days for a face-to-face medical appointment with her Primary Care Physician (MAP). The proposal made by the FC was accepted by the General Practitioner (GP).Follow-up of the case is carried out, which allows verifying the resolution of the Health Problem as well as the DRP and NRM detected, achieving an improvement in the patient's health and thus guaranteeing rational, safe and effective use of the medication.