[Clinical study on the incidence of femoral head posterior tilt angle in non-displaced femoral neck fractures].

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the occurrence of posterior femoral head tilt after clinical non-displaced femoral neck fracture, and to provide a reference basis for clinical surgery and improvement of disease prognosis. METHODS: Total of 165 patients with non-displaced femoral neck fractures of Garden typeⅠandⅡfrom January 2018 to June 2022 were selected as study subjects including 48 males and 117 females, with an average age of (71.5±8.5) years old ranging from 53 to 89, involving 97 cases of typeⅠand 68 of typeⅡ. On the patient's preoperative sagittal or axial CT film of the hip, the angle formed by the radius line of the femoral head and the midline of the femoral neck was used as the posterior tilt angle of the femoral head (α), and the posterior tilt femoral head angle was measured using the method proposed by Palm. The measured data were divided into 6 groups:α<0°, 0°<α< 5°, 5°≤α<10°, 10°≤α<15°, 15°≤α<20°, α≥20°, and the incidence of different ranges of posterior tilt angle was compared. The sex composition ratio of 165 patients were analyzed and compared, and the age of 65 was used as the cut-off point to compare the incidence of fractures between genders. Patients were divided into the posterior tilt <20° group for 135 cases and the posterior tilt ≥20°group for 30 cases according to the preoperative posterior tilt angle, the differences between two groups in terms of gender and age were analyzed. RESULTS: Among 165 patients with non-displaced femoral neck fractures, 143 cases with poaterior tilt of the femoral head occurred with an incidence of 86.7%. Posterior tilt 0°<α<5° accounted for 36 cases with an incidence of 21.8%;5°≤α<10° accounted for 40 cases with an incidence of 24.2%;10°≤α<15° accounted for 27 cases with an incidence of 16.4%;15°≤α<20° accounted for 10 cases with an incidence of 6.1%;posterior tilt angle α≥20° accounted for 30 cases, the incidence was 18.2%, of which the maximum posterior tilt angle was 42.7°. Statistical analysis showed that the percentage of fractures in the 165 patients selected for this study was significantly higher in female than in male, and that the female group was more likely to have fractures before the age of 65 years compared to the male group. However, gender, age and fracture subtypes (GardenⅠ, Ⅱ) were not influential factors for femoral neck fractures with a preoperative posterior femoral head tilt angle >20°(P>0.05). CONCLUSION: The incidence of femoral head posterior tile in non-displaced femoral neck fractures is relatively high, in which severe posterior tile occurs, and the femoral head posterior tile angle≥20° can reach 18.2%. In patients with closed reduction internal fixation, the fracture end needs to be repositioned as much as possible to reduce the risk of postoperative avascular necrosis of the femoral head. In order to prevent femoral neck fractures, special attention should be paid to anti-osteoporosis treatment for female. Preoperative assessment of posterior tilt is critical for patients of different ages, genders and fracture subtypes (GardenⅠ, Ⅱ).

Evaluating Pain Management from Peripheral Nerve Block for Geriatric Patients following Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty for Displaced Femoral-Neck Fracture.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to evaluate peripheral nerve block (PNB) effectiveness in postoperative pain management and surgical outcomes for displaced femoral-neck fracture in geriatric patients (>70 years) who underwent bipolar hemiarthroplasty (BHA). METHODS: From January 2017 to December 2021, 231 geriatric patients with displaced femoral-neck fracture who consecutively underwent BHA were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into two groups: the patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) group (n = 132) who received only intravenous (IV) PCA for postoperative pain management, and all others who received PNB with IV PCA (PNB+PCA) such as femoral nerve block or fascia iliaca compartment block after surgery (n = 99). Primary outcomes were postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) at rest and during activity at 6, 24, and 48 h postoperatively. Secondary outcomes were postoperative complications, changes in hemoglobin, length of hospital stay, and total morphine usage after surgery. RESULTS: Postoperative resting VAS at 6 h and 48 h was significantly lower in the PNB+PCA group compared with the PCA group (p = 0.075, p = 0.0318, respectively). However, there was no significant difference in either resting VAS at 24 h or active VAS. Complications of pneumonia and delirium until 1 month postoperative were significantly lower in the PNB + PCA group than the PCA group (p = 0.0022, p = 0.0055, respectively). CONCLUSION: PNB with IV PCA seems to have a beneficial effect on geriatric femoral-neck patients who underwent BHA with postoperative analgesia for reducing postoperative resting pain and complications, especially pneumonia and delirium.

Risk factors for intraoperative femoral fractures in cementless bipolar hip arthroplasty for femoral neck fracture in multicenter: The TRON group study.

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative femoral fractures are more common in cementless bipolar hip arthroplasty (BHA) for displaced femoral neck fractures than they are in cemented BHA and remain one of the major concerns. This study aimed to investigate the risk factors for intraoperative femoral fractures in cementless BHA. METHODS: The study included 1,392 patients who underwent cementless BHA for displaced femoral neck fractures from January 2015 to December 2019 in 14 hospitals of the Trauma Research Group. They were divided into two groups according to the presence or absence of intraoperative femoral fractures, and factors associated with intraoperative fractures were statistically examined. RESULTS: Forty (2.9 %) intraoperative and 28 (2.0 %) postoperative, totally 68 (4.9 %) femoral fractures occurred. The mean age of the patients, presence of opposite-side proximal femoral fracture, approach, and cementless stem design were significantly different between the two groups (P < 0.05). The logistic regression analysis model showed that a fully HA-coated stem (odds ratio, 4.12; 95 % confidence interval, 1.43-11.9) was an independent factor associated with intraoperative femoral fractures. CONCLUSION: This study investigated the risk factors associated with intraoperative fractures and showed that fully HA-coated stems were an independent factor associated with intraoperative femoral fractures. Surgeons should be cautious in the early stages of introducing fully HA-coated stems.

Open reduction and internal fixation of irreducible displaced femoral neck fracture with femoral Neck System: a preliminary study.

BACKGROUND: Most displaced femoral neck fractures can achieve satisfactory anatomical reduction by closed reduction, but there are still some that cannot reset satisfactorily after closed reduction, and open reduction are required. Such fractures that cannot be repositioned successfully by closed reduction are called irreducible displaced femoral neck fractures in this study. The objective of our study was to evaluate the efficacy of direct anterior incision with the Femoral Neck System in the treatment of irreducible displaced femoral fractures. METHODS: A total of 16 young and middle-aged patients with irreducible displaced femoral neck fractures involving Garden type III and IV were treated using Femoral Neck System fixation by open reduction through Direct Anterior Approach between January 2020 to September 2021. Functional outcomes and postoperative complications were assessed during follow-up. Clinical outcomes were evaluated by the Hip Harris score. The postoperative reduction was evaluated by the Garden Index. Observe postoperative complications. RESULTS: All patients were followed up with a mean follow-up time of 21.1(12-30) months, and according to radiological results, all patients achieved fracture healing, with a mean healing time of 4.25 months. All 16 patients received grade Garden I and II reductions, and there was no significant difference in the anteroposterior Garden reduction index between the first day after surgery (166.13 ± 5.61) and the 12th month after surgery(164.94 ± 4.49) (P>0.05) and no significant difference in lateral Garden index between the first day after surgery(171.06 ± 4.46) and the 12th month after surgery(169.38 ± 3.98) (P<0.05). According to the Hip Harris score scale, 13 patients received excellent and 3 patients received good. The postoperative Hip Harris Score(17.19 ± 4.8) was significantly higher than the preoperative score(92.19 ± 3.4), and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). No or mild femoral neck shortness occurred in 12 (75%) patients, moderate shortening occurred in 3 (18.75%) patients, and severe shortening occurred in 1 (6.25%) patient. None of the patients experienced femoral head necrosis, fracture nonunion, or incision infection. One patient developed deep venous thrombosis of the lower extremity. CONCLUSIONS: The Direct Anterior Approach combined with Femoral Neck System is an excellent treatment for irreducible displaced femoral neck fracture and achieved good functional outcomes and anatomical reduction with low complications.

Total hip arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty in the treatment of active elderly patients over 75 years with displaced femoral neck fractures: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Femoral neck fractures are associated with substantial morbidity and mortality for older adults. Total hip arthroplasty (THA) and hemiarthroplasty (HA) are widely used in elderly patients with displaced femoral neck fractures (DFNF), but there is still controversy refering to the optimal chose for the management of DFNF in active elderly patients. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study that incorporates medical record review with an outcomes management database. 73 patients who underwent HA and 66 patients who underwent THA were identified from January 2015 to December 2017. Data of age, gender, BMI, comorbidity status, operation time, blood loss, hospitalization time, in-hospital complication were collected and analyzed. Clinical follow-up and radiographic examinations were performed at approximately five years, and hip complications, Harris Hip Score (HHS) and EuroQol-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) were assessed. RESULTS: Preoperative general data of sex, age, BMI and charlson comorbidity score of THA group(n=55) has no statistically significant difference with that of HA group. Patients treated by THA had significantly longer operation time (105.5 vs 76.7 minutes; P < 0.001), more blood loss (524.1 vs 350.1 ml; P < 0.001) and longer hospitalization time (15.8 vs 13.8 days; P < 0.001). There was no significant differences between two groups in complications (32.7% vs 25.8%, P=0.432). No patients died during the hospitalization. After five years, only 33 patients in the THA group and 34 patents in the HA group were still alive, and the fraction surviving were not statistically significant between two groups (60.0% vs 54.8%, P> 0.05). The differences in hip function in favor of THA appeared to increase after the five-year follow-up, and the difference was significant in terms of the total Harris hip score (81.3 vs 73.1, P < 0.001) as well as in the dimensions of pain (38.9 vs 35.9, P=0.033), function (33.7 vs 29.2, P=0.001), absence of deformity (4.0 vs 3.9, P=0.023) and range of motion (4.6 vs 4.2, P=0.008). There was no significant differences between groups in hip dislocation rate (6.1% vs 0.0%, P=0.239). The erosion rate of hip joint in the THA group was significantly lower than that of the HA group (0.0% vs 26.5%, P=0.002). The health-related quality of life, according to EQ-5D index score, was found to be higher (0.69 vs 0.63, P= 0.001) in the THA group than the HA group after five years. CONCLUSION: THA may be a preferred management option for active elderly patients over 75 years. The more extensive surgery of THA is not associated with higher in-hospital complication rate or mortality rate. These patients can benefit from THA in terms of hip function and quality of life. TRIAL REGISTRATION: No.

Comparative Study Between Closed Reduction Internal Fixation Alone Versus Closed Reduction Internal Fixation and Addition of Muscle Pedicle Bone Graft for Prevention of Osteonecrosis in Cases of Displaced Femoral Neck Fractures.

Background: In patients of less than 60 years of age, osteosynthesis is the treatment of choice for displaced femoral neck fractures (Garden 3 and 4). Most of these fractures unite well but chances of osteonecrosis are quite high even after early operations and till date there is no well-defined method of prediction and prevention of osteonecrosis. Vascularized bone graft may prevent the development of osteonecrosis. Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective case control study done in an urban Medical College in eastern India and tried to evaluate efficacy of addition of quadratus femoris muscle pedicle bone graft in cases of osteosynthesis comparing the results of cases treated with closed reduction and internal fixation alone for femoral neck fractures We have taken into consideration 45 consecutive cases from each group with identical demographic background and of very similar age pattern of 20 years to 60 years.For further reference, we will describe Group I for closed reduction and CHS/DHS only, and Group II for closed reduction CHS and quadratus femoris muscle pedicle graft. Results: Satisfactory bony union occurred in 42 out of 45 follow-up patients in Group 1 (93.3%) and 43 out of 45 patients in Group 2. (95.5%) In 2- to 10-year follow-up period, eight patients (18.6%) developed osteonecrosis in Group I, and in Group 2, in the same period, there were no cases of osteonecrosis. Conclusion: Addition of quadratus femoris muscle pedicle bone graft is a very effective procedure for prevention of osteonecrosis when we attempt osteosynthesis by closed reduction and internal fixation for displaced femoral neck fractures.

Patients with femoral neck fractures treated by bipolar hemiarthroplasty have superior to unipolar hip function and lower erosion rates and pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies.

PURPOSE: We assessed acetabular erosion, hip function, quality of life (QoL), pain, deep infection, mortality, re-operation and dislocation rates in patients with displaced femoral neck fractures (dFNFs) treated with unipolar versus bipolar hemiarthroplasty at different postoperative time points. METHODS: Relevant Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) were identified, following comprehensive literature research in Medline, Cochrane Central and Scopus databases, from conception until August 31th, 2021 and analyzed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. RESULTS: Database research retrieved 120 studies; sixteen met eligibility criteria, providing 1813 (1814 hips) evaluable patients. Acetabular erosion was significantly higher for unipolar group at 6 and 12 months (p = 0.02 and p = 0.01 respectively). Patients in the bipolar group presented significantly better hip function at 12 and 24 months (p = 0.02 and p = 0.04 respectively). Postoperative pain was significantly less in the bipolar group at 12, 24 and 48 months (p = 0.01). No statistically significant differences were found regarding the postoperative rates of deep infection, mortality, re-operation and dislocation. CONCLUSION: This study showed that patients with dFNFs treated with bipolar hemiarthroplasty have lower acetabular erosion rates at 6 and 12 months postoperatively, better hip function at 12 and 24 months, better QoL and less pain, when compared with unipolar. No statistically significant difference could be established regarding deep infection, mortality, re-operation and dislocation rates.

Who, if anyone, may benefit from a total hip arthroplasty after a displaced femoral neck fracture?: a post hoc subgroup analysis of the HEALTH trial.

AIMS: The aim of this study was to explore the functional results in a fitter subgroup of participants in the Hip Fracture Evaluation with Alternatives of Total Hip Arthroplasty versus Hemiarthroplasty (HEALTH) trial to determine whether there was an advantage of total hip arthroplasty (THA) versus hemiarthroplasty (HA) in this population. METHODS: We performed a post hoc exploratory analysis of a fitter cohort of patients from the HEALTH trial. Participants were aged over 50 years and had sustained a low-energy displaced femoral neck fracture (FNF). The fittest participant cohort was defined as participants aged 70 years or younger, classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists grade I or II, independent walkers prior to fracture, and living at home prior to fracture. Multilevel models were used to estimate the effect of THA versus HA on functional outcomes. In addition, a sensitivity analysis of the definition of the fittest participant cohort was performed. RESULTS: There were 143 patients included in the fittest cohort. Mean age was 66 years (SD 4.5) and 103 were female (72%). No clinically relevant differences were found between the treatment groups in the primary and sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSION: This analysis found no differences in functional outcomes between HA and THA within two years of displaced low-energy FNF in a subgroup analysis of the fittest HEALTH patients. These findings suggest that very few patients above 50 years of age benefit in a clinically meaningful way from a THA versus a HA early after injury.Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(8):611-617.

Outcomes and survival of a modern dual mobility cup and uncemented collared stem in displaced femoral neck fractures at a minimum 5-year follow-up.

INTRODUCTION: The choice of implant type for total hip replacement in the treatment of femoral neck fractures remains debated. Some authors advocate for the systematic use of cemented stems, while others do not use dual mobility first-line. We therefore conducted a retrospective study using a dual mobility cup (DMC) and an uncemented collared stem (UCS) in order to: (1) confirm the low dislocation rate in this indication, (2) assess other surgical complications, in particular periprosthetic fractures, (3) ensure that these benefits are maintained over time, at a minimum follow-up of 5 years and, (4) assess the rate of revision of the implants. HYPOTHESIS: Our hypothesis was that the dual mobility dislocation rate for the treatment of femoral neck fractures was lower than for bipolar hemiarthroplasties or single mobility hip prostheses. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective study of 244 femoral neck fractures (242 patients) treated with DMC and UCS was conducted, between 2013 and 2014. The mean age was 83±10 years (60-104). The occurrence of dislocation, periprosthetic fracture, infection of the surgical site, loosening, reoperation and revision were investigated. The HOOS Joint Replacement (JR) score was collected. The cumulative incidence with mortality was used as a competing risk. RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 6 years±0.5 (5-7). At the last follow-up, 108 patients (50%) had died. Twenty-three patients (9.5%) were lost to follow-up. One case of symptomatic aseptic loosening of DMC was observed. The cumulative incidence of dislocations and periprosthetic fractures at 5 years were 2% (95% CI: 0.9-5.4) and 3% (95% CI: 1.2-6), respectively. The 5-year cumulative incidence of surgical site infections was 3.5% (95% CI: 1.8-7). The cumulative incidence of reoperations at 5 years was 7% (95% CI: 4.5-11). The causes of reoperation were periprosthetic fracture (n=6), infection (n=8), postoperative hematoma (n=2) and cup malposition (n=2). The cumulative incidence of a revision at 5 years was 2.7% (95% CI: 1.2-6). The cumulative incidence of a surgical complication from any cause at 5 years was 9% (95% CI: 6.7-14.8). The mean HOOS JR score was 79±5 (52-92). DISCUSSION: The cumulative incidence of dislocation at 5 years is low and other surgical complications (including periprosthetic fractures) do not increase during this period for DMC associated with UCS, in femoral neck fractures. The use of this type of implant is reliable in the treatment of femoral neck fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV; retrospective study without control group.

A three-dimensional measurement based on CT for the posterior tilt with ideal inter-and intra-observer reliability in non-displaced femoral neck fractures.

Posterior tilt is associated with prognosis of non-displaced femoral neck fractures (FNFs). Knowledge of their association is critical and informs surgeons whether to choose internal fixation or arthroplasty in treatment of non-displaced FNFs. This study aimed to design a novel three-dimensional (3D) posterior tilt measurement and evaluate the intra- and inter-observer variability compared to two-dimensional (2D) measurement proposed by Palm. We hypothesized that 3D measurement would be more accurate and realistic with higher reliability. To test the hypothesis, three observers measured the posterior tilt on the radiographs of 50 non-displaced FNFs, twice with both methods. Intra- and inter-observer reliability for each measurement method used were determined. The measured angle was divided into two categories, at the cut-off of 20° for clinical practice simulation. Intra- and inter-observer reliability were identified for clinical effectiveness. The results indicated that inter- and intra-observer reliability for 3D measurement and its classification was almost perfect with an intraclass coefficient of 0.995 (0.994) and a kappa value of 0.927(0.947), respectively. Conversely, a substantial inter- and intra-observer reliability for the 2D measurement was obtained with an interclass coefficient of 0.764 as well as an intraclass coefficient of 0.773. The clinical validity for 2D measurement showed slight inter-reliability and moderate intra-reliability with a kappa value of 0.192 and 0.587, respectively. Hence, the novel 3D measurement appears to be more reliable with a strong inter- and intra-observer reliability measurement. Further clinical studies are needed to carry out to validate this hypothesis.

Who Restores Hip Biomechanics More Effectively after a Femoral Neck Fracture? Comparison of Total Hip Arthroplasties Performed by Either Hip Surgeons or Orthopaedic Residents.

BACKGROUND: This study aims to analyze the ability to restore hip biomechanics in patients who undergo total hip arthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures operated by either hip surgeons (HSs) or orthopaedic residents (ORs). METHODS: We retrospectively compared 95 patients treated by HSs (group A) with 110 patients treated by ORs (group B). Leg-length discrepancy, femoral offset (FO), center of rotation (COR), acetabular inclination, and acetabular anteversion were evaluated on postoperative radiographs using the healthy contralateral hip as control. RESULTS: The median leg-length discrepancy was 2 mm for both groups (P = .74). The leg length was increased in 54% of the HS group and 57% of the OR group (P = .13). The median FO difference of groups A and B were 7 mm and 5.5 mm, respectively (P = .14). FO was increased in 80% of the HS group and 69% of the OR group (P = .19). Median discrepancies of the horizontal and vertical CORs were not statistically relevant, with P-values of .69 and .14, respectively. The horizontal COR was slightly medialized in 58% of the HS group and 53% of the OR group (P = .003). The vertical COR was slightly proximal in 66% of the HS group and 76% of the OR group (P = .28). The median acetabular inclination angles of groups A and B were 41° and 40°, respectively (P = .62). The median anteversion angle was 19° for both groups (P = .89). CONCLUSIONS: The horizontal COR was the only measurement with statistical significance. To conclude, ORs under supervision are as reliable as HSs to properly restore hip biomechanics in patients who undergo total hip arthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures.

Hemiarthroplasty versus total arthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly: meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

INTRODUCTION: Displaced femoral neck fractures (FNF) are complicated by high mortality rates and continue to represent an important cause of disability, having a negative impact on patient mobility and physical independence. The purpose of this study was to update and analyse current outcomes and evidence concerning hip hemiarthroplasty (HHA) versus total hip arthroplasty (THA) for displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly. Thus, a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials was conducted. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This meta-analysis was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. In October 2019, the following databases were accessed: Embase, Google Scholar, Pubmed, Scopus. All randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing total hip arthroplasty versus hip hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures were included in the present study. For the statistical analysis and the methodological quality assessment, the Review Manager Software 5.3 (The Nordic Cochrane Collaboration, Copenhagen) and STATA/MP Software 14.1 (StataCorp, College Station, TX) were used. RESULTS: Data from 2325 (1171 HHA vs 1154 THA) patients were collected. The mean follow-up was 58.12 months. The HHA group reported lower values of the mean Harris hip score (EE 3.22; p = 0.2), surgical duration (EE 21.75; p < 0.0001), length of the hospitalization stay (EE 0.8; p = 0.4). The HHA group evidenced lower dislocations rate (OR 1.78; p = 0.01, Fig. 4), but higher rate of acetabular erosion (OR 0.08; p = 0.0006). At a mean of 58.12 ± 52.8 months follow-up, revisions rate scored reduced in the THA group (OR 0.76; p = 0.2). Subgroup analysis of RCTs < 5 years follow-up revealed reduced revision in favour of the HHA group (OR 2.19; p = 0.03), while subgroup analysis of RCTs > 5 years follow-up revealed reduced revision in favour of the THA group (OR 0.25; p = 0.0003). The Kaplan-Meier curve detected similarity of patients survivorship between the two groups (HR 1.06; p = 0.3). CONCLUSION: For the elderly population, both HHA and THA are valid solutions to treat displaced femoral neck fractures, with comparable survivorship. HHA detected reduced dislocations, while for THA a lower risk of acetabular erosion and further revision surgeries were reported. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I, meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Hemiarthroplasty vs Total Hip Arthroplasty for the Management of Displaced Neck of Femur Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Displaced femoral neck fractures (DFNF) are common and can be treated with osteosynthesis, hemiarthroplasty (HA), or total hip arthroplasty (THA). There is no consensus as to which intervention is superior in managing DFNF. METHODS: Studies were identified through a systematic search of the MEDLINE database, EMBASE database, and Cochrane Controlled Trials. Included studies were randomized or controlled trials (1966 to August 2018) comparing THA with HA for the management of DFNF. (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO Identifier: CRD42018110057). RESULTS: Seventeen studies were included totaling 1364 patients (660 THA and 704 HA). THA was found to be superior to HA in terms of risk of reoperation, Harris Hip Score and Quality of Life (Short Form 36). Overall, the risk of dislocation was greater in THA group than HA in the first 4 years, after which there was no difference. There was no difference between THA and HA in terms of mortality or infection. CONCLUSION: Overall, THA appears to be superior to HA. THA should be the recommended intervention for DFNF in patients with a life expectancy >4 years and in patients younger than 80 years. However, both HA and THA are reasonable interventions in patients older than 80 years and with shorter life expectancy.

DHS osteosynthesis with internal bone grafting in unstable delayed presented intracapsular neck femur fractures.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess fracture union and complications following use of dynamic hip screw (DHS) with internal bone grafting in treatment of unstable delayed presented intracapsular neck femur fractures in patients younger than 65 years of age. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty two patients with displaced intracapsular neck femur fractures(Garden III and IV, Pauwels III, with comminution) with delayed presentation (15-60 days) in the 45-65 year age group (mean 54.4±10.2 years) were included in this study. All patients were treated with dynamic sliding hip screw with closed cancellous bone grafting through a tunnel of a triple reamer. The average time to union was 3.8 months (3-5 months). Satisfactory union was achieved in all patients except two. One case developed avascular necrosis of the femoral head. Other complications were coxa vara in two, shortening of less than 10mm in three cases but there were no cases of infection or implant failure. Excellent results were achieved in 27, good/fair in 4 and poor in 1 patient. CONCLUSION: Osteosynthesis with DHS and primary cancellous bone grafting in indicated cases is a simple, providing biological stimulation for early union. Failure in a particular case can be treated with any appropriate second procedure.

Postoperative fever after hemiarthroplasty in elderly patients over 70 years of age with displaced femoral neck fracture: Necessity of routine workup?

OBJECTIVES: Displaced femoral neck fracture in elderly patients has been treated with hemiarthroplasty as the treatment of choice. Fever following HA is common in these elderly patients. The aim of this study was to determine which post-HA fever workup could be beneficial in this group of patients. METHODS: A total of 272 consecutive patients aged ≥70 years undergoing HA for displaced femoral neck fracture were retrospectively investigated. Postoperative fever (POF) was defined as any recorded body temperature ≥38°C in the early postoperative period. POF in each patient was characterized by the maximum temperature, the day of the first fever, and frequency of fever, stratified as either single or multiple fever spikes. Medical records were reviewed to identify positive fever workups and febrile complications. RESULTS: Of 272 patients, 135 (49.6%) developed POF. A total of 428 routine diagnostic tests were performed in all patients with POF, of which only 57 tests (13.3%) were positive. Urinalysis showed the highest positive rate (21.9%), followed by urine culture (14.3%), chest x-ray (12.6%), and blood culture (1.1%). The most common febrile complication was pneumonia (12.6%), followed by urinary tract infection (8.1%). On multivariate logistic regression for positive workups, only fever after postoperative day (POD) 2 was a risk factor for positive chest x-ray (OR 3.86, p=0.016) and urine culture (OR 5.04, p=0.019). Moreover, fever after POD 2 (OR 6.93, p<0.0001) and multiple fever spikes (OR 2.92, p=0.026) were independent predictors of infectious febrile complications. CONCLUSIONS: Routine workup for POF following hemiarthroplasty in elderly patients with displaced femoral neck fracture is not warranted. However, for fever after POD 2 and multiple fever spikes, chest x-ray and urinalysis would be necessary to rule out the two most common febrile complications such as pneumonia and urinary tract infection.

Unstable intertrochanteric versus displaced femoral neck fractures treated with cementless bipolar hemiarthroplasty in elderly patients; a comparison of 80 matched patients.

BACKGROUND: While hemiarthroplasty (HA) is considered the treatment of choice for displaced femoral neck (FN) fractures in elderly patients, HA has been partly performed as an alternative treatment option for unstable intertrochanteric (IT) fractures. However, there is a paucity of data regarding the risk and availability of HA for unstable IT fractures compared to HA for displaced FN fractures in elderly patients. Therefore, we performed this case-control study to determine whether HA for unstable IT fractures provides clinical results and survival comparable to HA for displaced FN fractures in elderly patients. HYPOTHESIS: HA for unstable IT fractures in elderly patients provides clinical results and 1-year survival comparable to HA for displaced FN fractures in the same aging group. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified 80 patients aged 75years or older, who underwent cementless bipolar HA for unstable IT fracture (AO/OTA type 31-A2.2/3 and A3.3). Their clinical results and 1-year survival were compared to the matched control group of 80 patients with displaced FN fractures (Garden type 3 and 4) treated with the same procedure. Perioperative results, postoperative complications, and 1-year survival were investigated between the two groups. Functional outcome was assessed by walking status and Harris hip score (HHS) 6months after surgery. RESULTS: Operating time was significantly longer in the IT group than the FN group (97.3min [50 to 255] vs. 79.3min [40 to 175], P=0.016). However, the two groups did not significantly differ regarding perioperative results, such as total blood loss, transfusion, intraoperative fracture, length of hospital stay, and postoperative complication. No statistically significant differences in walking status and HHS were observed between the groups. No significant difference in cumulative survival was observed between the two groups (P=0.836), with a 1-year survival rate of 80% (95% confidence interval [CI], 71.8 to 87.5) in the IT group and 82% (95% CI, 73.1 to 89.4) in the FN group. CONCLUSION: HA for unstable IT fractures in elderly patients showed clinical results and 1-year survival comparable to HA as the treatment of choice for displaced FN fractures in the same aging group. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, case-control study.

Cemented hemiarthroplasty in traumatic displaced femoral neck fractures and deep vein thrombosis: is there really a link?

INTRODUCTION: Traumatic displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly can be treated with cemented or uncemented hemiarthroplasty with good outcomes. Earlier studies reported a higher incidence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) associated with cemented prostheses in elective total hip or knee arthroplasty. In addition, the hypercoagulable state after a traumatic femoral neck fracture and possible thrombogenic properties of bone cement could put these patients at greater risk for thromboembolism. We aimed to compare the incidence of DVT and progression to pulmonary embolism (PE) or mortality in cemented and uncemented hemiarthroplasty. METHODS: The data of 271 patients treated with cemented or uncemented hemiarthroplasty after a traumatic displaced femoral neck fracture was retrospectively analysed for the incidence of DVT. The level of thrombosis, progression to PE and mortality were compared. RESULTS: There were 133 (49.1%) patients with cemented hemiarthroplasty, while 138 (50.9%) had uncemented hemiarthroplasty. The patients had an average age of 76.6 (range 53-99) years and 11 (4.1%) patients had DVT. There were no significant differences in development of DVT, level of thrombosis, PE and mortality regardless of whether a cemented or an uncemented prosthesis was used. CONCLUSION: Cemented hemiarthroplasty is not associated with higher risks of DVT, PE or mortality in patients with traumatic displaced femoral neck fracture. Cemented prostheses can be safely used for this group of patients.

[PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED STUDY ON TREATMENT OF DISPLACED FEMORAL NECK FRACTURES WITH PERCUTANEOUS COMPRESSION PLATE].

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of percutaneous compression plate (PCCP) and hollow compression screw in the treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures. METHODS: Between January 2010 and June 2014, 70 patients with displaced femoral neck fractures were randomly divided into 2 groups. After reduction, fracture was fixed with PCCP in 35 cases (group A) and with hollow compression screw in 35 cases (group B). There was no significant difference in the gender, age, cause, side and type of fractures, time from injury to operation, associated disease, pre-operative Harris score and visual analogue scale (VAS) score between 2 groups (P>0.05). The operation time, intra-operative blood loss, fracture healing time, fracture reduction quality, time of rehabilitation and weightloading; complication, post-operative Harris score and post-operative VAS score were compared between 2 groups. RESULTS: The incisions healed by first intention. All patients were followed up 13-34 months (mean, 23.7 months). There were significant differences in operation time, intra-operative blood loss, and fracture healing time between 2 groups (P<0.05). There was no significant in the fracture reduction quality between 2 groups (P>0.05). Avascular necrosis of the femoral head occurred in 2 cases of group A after operation (fracture reduction quality: grade IV); and avascular necrosis of the femoral head occurred in 4 cases of group B after operation (fracture reduction quality: grade I in 2 cases, grade Ⅱ in 1 case, grade Ⅲ in 1 case, and grade IV in 1 case), nonunion in 1 case, and screw loosening in 3 cases; and there was significant difference in the incidence of bone nonunion and avascular necrosis of the femoral head between 2 groups (χ2=-3.997, P=0.046). Difference was significant in fracture reduction quality in the patients with avascular necrosis of the femoral head and nonunion between 2 groups (χ2=1.991, P=0.047）. The time of rehabilitation and weight-loading of group A was significantly earlier than that of group B (P<0.05); the Harris and VAS scores of group A were significantly better than those of group B at 12 months after operation (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: PCCP for treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures has better static stability and better sliding dynamic pressure effect than hollow compression screw, and it can provide earlier rehabilitation and weight-loading postoperatively and obviously decrease the incidence of bone nonunion and avascular necrosis of the femoral head, but avascular necrosis of the femoral head still occur in patients with poor reduction or comminuted fracture.

PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED STUDY ON TREATMENT OF DISPLACED FEMORAL NECK FRACTURES WITH PERCUTANEOUS COMPRESSION PLATE / 中国修复重建外科杂志

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of percutaneous compression plate (PCCP) and hollow compression screw in the treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures.

Cemented hemiarthroplasty in traumatic displaced femoral neck fractures and deep vein thrombosis: is there really a link?

<p><b>INTRODUCTION</b>Traumatic displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly can be treated with cemented or uncemented hemiarthroplasty with good outcomes. Earlier studies reported a higher incidence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) associated with cemented prostheses in elective total hip or knee arthroplasty. In addition, the hypercoagulable state after a traumatic femoral neck fracture and possible thrombogenic properties of bone cement could put these patients at greater risk for thromboembolism. We aimed to compare the incidence of DVT and progression to pulmonary embolism (PE) or mortality in cemented and uncemented hemiarthroplasty.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>The data of 271 patients treated with cemented or uncemented hemiarthroplasty after a traumatic displaced femoral neck fracture was retrospectively analysed for the incidence of DVT. The level of thrombosis, progression to PE and mortality were compared.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>There were 133 (49.1%) patients with cemented hemiarthroplasty, while 138 (50.9%) had uncemented hemiarthroplasty. The patients had an average age of 76.6 (range 53-99) years and 11 (4.1%) patients had DVT. There were no significant differences in development of DVT, level of thrombosis, PE and mortality regardless of whether a cemented or an uncemented prosthesis was used.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>Cemented hemiarthroplasty is not associated with higher risks of DVT, PE or mortality in patients with traumatic displaced femoral neck fracture. Cemented prostheses can be safely used for this group of patients.</p>