Using a Nice knot to simplify and strengthen closed reduction in displaced distal clavicle fracture: a technical note.

A displaced distal clavicle fracture often necessitates surgical intervention, with various open and closed reduction options. Open reduction is easier but raises blood supply concerns, while closed reduction can involve complex deforming forces with differing displacement vectors. Herein, we demonstrate how a Nice knot with its sliding and self-locking qualities can be used to make closed reduction easier and the alignment more secure. A case report illustrates this Nice knot application in a 61-year-old male with a distal clavicle fracture. The Nice knot's ability to be loosened and retightened ensured more precise alignment in this case. The Nice knot technique is a versatile option for easier and more secure distal clavicle fracture management.

Biomechanical evaluation of fixation of the coracoclavicular stand-alone cow-hitch suture reconstruction in comparison to two established techniques for highly unstable distal clavicle fractures (Neer type V).

Background: Treatment of displaced distal clavicle fractures with bony avulsion of the coracoclavicular (CC) ligaments often warrants surgical fixation, yet a gold standard surgical technique is to be defined. The purpose of this study was to compare the biomechanical fixation strength of a new fixation technique, the CC stand-alone cow-hitch suture reconstruction, and to compare this technique with a clavicle hook plate and a lateral locking plate with CC suture reconstruction. Methods: Simulated Neer type V distal clavicle fractures of the clavicle were created in 18 cadaveric shoulders, which were matched by age and gender in 3 groups: (1) clavicle hook plate (group HP), (2) lateral locking plate fixation with CC suture reconstruction (group LPCC), and (3) CC stand-alone suture reconstruction using the cow-hitch technique (group CH). After preconditioning with 25 N for 10 cycles, the specimens were cycled in the coronal plane for 500 cycles from 10N to 70N. Displacement and ultimate load to failure were documented and analyzed with the data acquisition system. Results: There was a significant difference in the fracture displacement during cyclic loading between the LPCC group and the HP group (0.6 vs. 1.7 mm; P = .02) and between the CH and HP groups (0.5 vs. 1.7 mm; P = .004). Fracture displacement was not different between the LPCC and the CH groups (P = .544). The CH group and the LPCC group showed a significantly higher stiffness compared to the HP group (P < .001 and P = .003, respectively). The CH group showed a significantly higher ultimate load to failure compared with the HP group (429 vs. 172 N; P = .005) and showed a tendency toward higher ultimate load to failure when compared with the LPCC group (429 vs. 258 N; P = .071). Conclusion: The CC stand-alone cow-hitch suture reconstruction and the locking plate with CC reconstruction showed higher fixation strength compared with the hook plate for simulated Neer type V distal clavicle fractures. There was a tendency of higher ultimate load to failure with the cow-hitch technique compared with the lateral locking plate with CC suture reconstruction, and given the potential advantages of less soft tissue stripping, metal-free fixation, low costs, and simple surgical technique, clinical application of the all-suture CC reconstruction using the cow-hitch for Neer type V distal clavicle fractures appears warranted.

[Effectiveness of Kirschner wire fixation and coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction with suture anchor in treatment of Cho type â ¡C distal clavicle fractures].

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of Kirschner wire fixation and coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction with suture anchor in the treatment of Cho type ⅡC distal clavicle fractures. Methods: The data of 17 patients with Cho type ⅡC distal clavicular fractures, who were treated with Kirschner wire fixation and coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction with suture anchor between June 2019 and June 2021, was retrospectively analyzed. There were 11 males and 6 females with an average age of 38.7 years (range, 19-72 years). The fractures were caused by falling in 12 cases and traffic accident in 5 cases. All patients had fresh closed fractures. The interval from injury to operation was 1-5 days (mean, 2.6 days). The preoperative injury severity score (ISS) was 6-27 (mean, 10.2). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, hospital stay, fracture healing, and postoperative complications were analyzed. The shoulder joint function was evaluated by disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) score and Constant score at last follow-up. Results: All operations were completed successfully. The operation time was 20-50 minutes (mean, 31.6 minutes). The intraoperative blood loss was 30-100 mL (mean, 50.6 mL). The hospital stay was 4-9 days (mean, 5.3 days). All incisions healed by first intention. All patients were followed up 12-16 months (mean, 13 months). All clavicle fractures healed, and the healing time was 8-15 weeks (mean, 11 weeks). No complications such as fracture displacement or nonunion caused by internal fixation failure occurred. During the follow-up, skin irritation caused by the Kirschner wire withdrawal occurred in 3 cases. The Kirschner wires were removed after fracture healing in 17 patients. At last follow-up, the Constant score of shoulder joint was 90-100 (mean, 98.2). The DASH score was 0-10 (mean, 1.5). Conclusion: Kirschner wire fixation combined with coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction with suture anchor in the treatment of Cho type ⅡC distal clavicle fractures has less postoperative complications and slight complications. It is convenient to remove the internal fixator. The Kirschner wire does not fix the distal clavicle fracture through the acromion, which has little effect on shoulder joint function and can obtain good effectiveness.

Osteosynthesis using scorpion plate for nonunion of distal clavicle fracture with small distal bone fragment: A case report.

Distal clavicle nonunion is a relatively common complication of unstable, displaced distal clavicle fractures; however, its standard surgical procedure has not been fully established. We describe a case of symptomatic nonunion of a distal clavicle fracture with a very small distal bone fragment that was treated with a scorpion plate. A 63-year-old man presented with left shoulder pain after a bicycle fall 5 months earlier. Plain radiographs and computed tomography revealed atrophic nonunion of the distal clavicle with a small distal bone fragment measuring 12 mm in length. Shoulder pain interfered with his work and daily life; therefore, we scheduled surgery. After releasing the nonunion site, cancellous bone was grafted from the iliac crest. We placed a scorpion plate with two grasping arms that fixed the distal clavicular fragment without straddling the acromioclavicular joint. One year postoperatively, his pain subsided, and bone union was confirmed. Our case presents a surgical procedure for treating the nonunion of distal clavicle fractures using a scorpion plate and an autologous bone graft. This procedure is especially beneficial for cases with small distal bone fragments, because the grasping arms of the scorpion plate allow secure fixation of the distal bone fragment and bone graft without further fragmentation.

Hook plate fixation of Neer type II distal clavicle fractures results in satisfactory patient-reported outcomes but complications and revisions are high.

BACKGROUND: Surgical treatment of distal clavicle fractures Neer type II is challenging. A gold standard has not yet been established, thus various surgical procedures have been described. The purpose of this study is to report the radiological and clinical outcomes using hook plate fixation in Neer type II distal clavicle fractures. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed data of 53 patients who underwent hook plate fixation between December 2009 and December 2019 with ≥ 2 years of follow-up. Patients with preexisting pathologies or concomitant injuries of the ipsilateral shoulder were excluded. Pre- and postoperative coracoclavicular distance (CCD), bony union and patient-reported outcomes were collected, including the Constant Score (CS) and Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV). Complications and revisions were recorded. RESULTS: At a mean final follow-up of 6.2 years, mean SSV was 91.0% (range, 20-100) and mean CS was 80.9 points (range, 25-99). The mean preoperative CCD was 19.0 mm (range, 5.7-31.8), the mean postoperative CCD was 8.2 mm (range, 4.4-12.2) and the mean CCD following hardware removal was 9.7 mm (range, 4.7-18.8). The loss of reduction following hardware removal was statistically significant (P = 0.007). Eleven (20.8%) patients had complications, with 5 cases of deep or superficial infection (9.4%), four non-unions (7.5%), one periosteosynthetic fracture, one postoperative seroma, one implant failure and one symptomatic acromioclavicular joint arthritis (all 1.9%). A total of 10 patients (18.9%) underwent revision surgery at a mean of 113 (range, 7-631) days. CONCLUSION: Medium-term patient-reported outcomes for hook plate fixation of Neer type II distal clavicle fractures are satisfactory; however, one in five patients suffers a complication with the majority of them requiring revision surgery.

Classification of Distal Clavicle Fractures and Indications for Conservative Treatment.

Management of distal clavicle fractures depends on a clear understanding of the injury's proximity to the ligamentous attachments joining the clavicle and scapula. Various classification systems have been proposed to guide treatment. Despite this, controversy between operative and nonoperative management remains for certain fracture patterns. Patient-specific factors, concomitant injuries, fracture characteristics (displacement, shortening, and rotation) should all be considered when deciding on treatment. When nonoperative management is indicated, patients should be immobilized in a sling for 2 weeks, followed by gradual range of motion, and strengthening exercises.

Operative Management for Displaced Distal Clavicle Fractures.

This article reviews techniques and outcomes of surgical fixation for distal clavicle fractures. Near 100% union has been reported for several techniques. The most common are locked plating, coracoclavicular fixation and a combination of plating with CC fixation. Hook plates are useful for particular fracture patterns, but there can be complications specific to this implant. Low-profile constructs are favored due to the high rates of symptomatic hardware. Fixation of subacute and chronic injuries can provide reliable functional improvements, but is inferior to acute fixation. Surgery is generally the treatment of choice for displaced fractures in athletes.

＜Editors' Choice＞ Hook plate fixation versus locking plate fixation for distal clavicle fracture: a multicenter propensity score-matched study.

Hook plate fixation and locking plate fixation are two standard internal fixation implants for treating distal clavicle fractures. We aimed to clarify the following: 1) Does the locking plate offer better clinical outcomes than the hook plate? 2) Is bone union better with a locking plate than hook plate? and 3) Are complications different between the locking plate and hook plate? We conducted a retrospective multicenter study of 338 patients who underwent surgery from 2014 to 2018 in our 10 hospitals, which comprise the TRON group. Of them, 208 patients treated using any plates were eligible. After 30 patients were excluded for various reasons, 178 patients were included. We classified them into two groups, locking plate group (Group L) and hook plate group (Group H), using propensity score matching. We confirmed bone union with an X-ray, evaluated the UCLA shoulder score, and compared the frequency of complications. After matching, Group L and Group H included 49 patients each. The UCLA score was higher in Group L than in Group H at each follow-up point. We confirmed bone union in all patients in Group L, but it was not confirmed in three patients (6.1%) in Group H. No statistically significant differences were observed except for plate migration, which was observed in nine patients (18.4%) in Group H but in no patients in Group L. The postoperative UCLA score was significantly better in Group L. We recommend the locking plate as a surgical treatment for distal clavicle fractures.

Accelerated rehabilitation in treating neer type V distal clavicle fractures using anatomical locking plates with coracoclavicular ligament augmentation.

Background: There is still no gold standard treatment for Neer type V distal clavicle fractures. This study was designed to evaluate the therapeutic effects of accelerated rehabilitation in treating Neer type V fractures using anatomical locking plate (ALP) fixation with additional coracoclavicular (CC) ligament augmentation. Methods: In this retrospective study, patients who underwent ALP fixation with additional suture anchor fixation of acute Neer type V distal clavicle fracture from January 2016 to January 2021 were reviewed. Injury radiography and computed tomography (CT) were performed to determine the Neer classification. All patients performed standardized early rehabilitation exercises after surgery and were followed up for more than 12 months. The Constant-Murley score (CMS); the disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) questionnaire; visual analog scale (VAS); and the percentage of modified CC distance (MCCD%) were evaluated at the last follow-up. Results: Thirty-two patients were included in this study. The mean follow-up time was 31.1 ± 10.4 months. All patients achieved bone union 6-8 weeks (7.2 ± 0.7 weeks) after surgery and were allowed to return to normal daily life. No surgery-related complications occurred in any case. The MCCD% value at the last follow-up (104.7% ± 8.5%) significantly decreased compared with preoperative MCCD% value (162.8% ± 7.2%) (p < 0.001), indicating that all patients achieved ideal fracture reduction. And all patients obtained satisfactory shoulder joint function with a mean CMS of 97.1 ± 2.6, a mean DASH score of 1.6 ± 1.3, and a mean VAS score of 0.4 ± 0.6. Conclusion: This study has demonstrated that ALP fixation with additional suture anchor fixation is a promising strategy for accelerated rehabilitation in treating patients with Neer type V fracture.

A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the use of hook plates and superior plates in the treatment of displaced distal clavicle fractures.

INTRODUCTION: Non-operative treatment of displaced distal clavicle fractures results in high non-union and yet there is no consensus on superior treatment modality. While there are a number of different techniques available for fixation, hook plate (HP) has been used most commonly. A number of modern techniques, including superior plate (SP), have shown less complications but equivocal union rate and shoulder function. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to compare the outcome of HP fixation with superior plate in surgical fixation of displaced distal clavicle fractures. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A review of the online databases MEDLINE and Embase was conducted on 15 January 2021 according to PRISMA guidelines. The review was registered prospectively in the PROSPERO database. Clinical studies reporting union rate, complications and shoulder function were included. The studies were appraised using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) tool. RESULTS: The search strategy identified 42 studies eligible for inclusion with a total of 1,261 patients. These included 17 hook-plate case series (n = 573), 18 superior plate case series, of which 6 used SP alone (n = 223) and 12 SP and simultaneous CCLR case series (n = 189), and 7 studies comparing HP and SP (n = 276). The overall complication rate was significantly higher with HP when compared to SP [(32.7% vs 12.7%; OR 6.31 (95% CI: 2.67-14.91)]. The overall union rates in the case series appeared comparable in the current SR; HP 96.4%, SP 96.9% and SP with simultaneous CCLR 97.9%. Shoulder function was most commonly assessed using CM score and the mean ranged from 83.8 to 97.2 in HP, 89 to 98 in SP group and 90.6 to 97.6 in SP with CCLR. Meta-analysis of CM score failed to show a significant difference for HP versus SP (pooled weighted mean difference was 2.67 (95% CI: - 0.09 to 5.43) with a trend to favour SP fixation. CONCLUSION: The current review has demonstrated that HP, SP alone or with CCLR all offer excellent union rate and appear to provide comparative functional outcomes. However, HP is associated with significantly higher complication rates.

Open coraco-clavicular ligament reconstruction (CCLR) in treatment of displaced distal clavicle fractures has low complication rate and excellent union rate: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: It is well established that non-operative treatment of displaced distal clavicle fractures (DDCF) leads to a high non-union rate. A number of open surgical treatments in the past have shown good to excellent outcomes including shoulder function and union rate. Despite this there is no consensus on the outcome of open coraco-clavicular ligament reconstruction (CCLR). The aim of this systematic review was to assess the union rate, complications and shoulder function of open CCLR techniques in the treatment of DDCF. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A review of the online databases MEDLINE and Embase was conducted on 1 January 2021 according to PRISMA guidelines. The review was registered prospectively in the PROSPERO database. Clinical studies reporting union rate, complications and shoulder function were included. The studies were appraised using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) tool. RESULTS: The search strategy identified 18 studies eligible for inclusion with a total of 330 patients. These included 12 retrospective case series and 5 nonrandomized retrospective comparative studies and one RCT. All but one study reported on shoulder function, while all the studies reported on union rate and complications. The overall shoulder function was good to excellent using Constant-Murley score. The overall union rate was 97.6% and complication rate was 7.6%. CONCLUSION: Open CCLR for displaced distal clavicle fractures that have a disruption of CC ligament, is a reliable treatment with excellent union rate and good to excellent shoulder functional scores. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV; Systematic review.

Comparison of functional outcome and complications of locking plate versus coracoclavicular fixation in the treatment of unstable distal clavicle fractures: the multicenter, propensity-matched TRON study.

PURPOSE: This multicenter, retrospective study aimed to compare clinical outcomes and complications between locking plate fixation and new coracoclavicular (CC) fixation for patients with unstable distal clavicle fracture. METHODS: We included 142 patients in this TRON study. The mean follow-up was 15.5 (6-31) months. The patients were divided into two groups: the locking plate group (Group L) and CC fixation group (Group C). To adjust for baseline differences between the groups, a propensity score algorithm was used to match two groups in a 1:1 ratio. After matching, we compared operation time and the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) shoulder score at 3 and 6 months postoperatively and at last follow-up as clinical outcomes and the rate of complications. RESULTS: After matching, 20 cases from each group remained. Operation time was shorter in Group C (75 [22, 111] vs. 100 [38, 120] min; P = 0.023). At 3 months postoperatively, UCLA score in Group C was better, but no significant differences between the groups were found at 6 months and last follow-up after surgery. The rate of complications was not significantly different between the groups. CONCLUSION: CC fixation might be equivalent to locking plate fixation in clinical outcome, and the operation time is shorter than that required for locking plate fixation.

[There is no difference in clinical outcomes in patients with distal Neer II and Neer V clavicle fractures treated with or without coracoclavicular augmentation systems]. / No existe diferencia en desenlaces clínicos en pacientes con fracturas de clavícula distal Neer II y Neer V tratados con o sin sistemas de aumentación coracoclavicular.

INTRODUCTION: the use of coracoclavicular augmentation systems together with locking plates in the treatment of unstable distal clavicle fractures (Neer II and Neer V) is controversial. MATERIAL AND METHODS: patients with unstable distal clavicle fractures treated between 2013-2022 were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were divided into two groups: patients treated with locking plates (P group) and patients treated with locking plates and coracoclavicular augmentation systems (PCC group). Postoperative complications, modified preoperative and final coracoclavicular distance (CC), and outcomes on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (Quick DASH) were recorded. RESULTS: 16 of 23 patients were treated with plates only, and 7 of 23 were treated with plates and coracoclavicular augmentation systems. One case showed no fracture consolidation, and there was one case of cutaneous infection. The mean final CC distance was 23.7 in the P group and 22.1 in the PCC group. The mean VAS score was 1.3 in both the P and PCC groups, while the mean Quick DASH score was 5.5 in the P group and 8.1 in the PCC group. No significant differences were found in CC distance, VAS or Quick DASH scores. CONCLUSION: the use of locking plates is likely sufficient in the management of unstable distal clavicle fractures, as there were no significant differences in functional outcomes in this study when coracoclavicular augmentation systems were used together with locking plates.

INTRODUCCIÓN: el uso de sistemas de aumentación coracoclaviculares en combinación con placas bloqueadas en el tratamiento de las fracturas de clavícula distal inestables es controvertido. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: se han revisado retrospectivamente los pacientes con fracturas distales de clavícula inestables tratados entre 2013-2022 en Hospital Clínic de Barcelona. Se dividieron a los pacientes en dos grupos: pacientes tratados con placas bloqueadas (grupo P) y pacientes tratados con placas bloqueadas y sistemas de aumentación coracoclaviculares (grupo PCC). Se registraron las complicaciones postoperatorias, distancia CC (coracoclavicular) modificada preoperatoria y final, así como los resultados en la escala visual analógica (EVA) y en el Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (Quick DASH). RESULTADOS: de un total de 23 pacientes, 16 se trataron sólo con placas y siete con placas y sistemas de aumentación coracoclaviculares. Se observó ausencia de consolidación en un caso e infección cutánea en otro. La distancia CC final media fue de 23.7 mm en el grupo P y de 22.1 mm en el grupo PCC. La media de la EVA fue de 1.3 en ambos grupos, mientras que el Quick DASH tuvo media de 5.5 en el grupo P y de 8.1 en el grupo PCC. No se encontraron diferencias significativas en la distancia CC, en la EVA ni en el Quick DASH. CONCLUSIÓN: los resultados sugieren que el uso de placas bloqueadas es probablemente suficiente en el manejo de las fracturas de clavícula distales inestables, sin observar diferencias significativas en los resultados funcionales al agregar sistemas de aumentación coracoclavicular.

Effectiveness of Kirschner wire fixation and coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction with suture anchor in treatment of Cho type ⅡC distal clavicle fractures / 中国修复重建外科杂志

OBJECTIVE@#To evaluate the effectiveness of Kirschner wire fixation and coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction with suture anchor in the treatment of Cho type ⅡC distal clavicle fractures.@*METHODS@#The data of 17 patients with Cho type ⅡC distal clavicular fractures, who were treated with Kirschner wire fixation and coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction with suture anchor between June 2019 and June 2021, was retrospectively analyzed. There were 11 males and 6 females with an average age of 38.7 years (range, 19-72 years). The fractures were caused by falling in 12 cases and traffic accident in 5 cases. All patients had fresh closed fractures. The interval from injury to operation was 1-5 days (mean, 2.6 days). The preoperative injury severity score (ISS) was 6-27 (mean, 10.2). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, hospital stay, fracture healing, and postoperative complications were analyzed. The shoulder joint function was evaluated by disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) score and Constant score at last follow-up.@*RESULTS@#All operations were completed successfully. The operation time was 20-50 minutes (mean, 31.6 minutes). The intraoperative blood loss was 30-100 mL (mean, 50.6 mL). The hospital stay was 4-9 days (mean, 5.3 days). All incisions healed by first intention. All patients were followed up 12-16 months (mean, 13 months). All clavicle fractures healed, and the healing time was 8-15 weeks (mean, 11 weeks). No complications such as fracture displacement or nonunion caused by internal fixation failure occurred. During the follow-up, skin irritation caused by the Kirschner wire withdrawal occurred in 3 cases. The Kirschner wires were removed after fracture healing in 17 patients. At last follow-up, the Constant score of shoulder joint was 90-100 (mean, 98.2). The DASH score was 0-10 (mean, 1.5).@*CONCLUSION@#Kirschner wire fixation combined with coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction with suture anchor in the treatment of Cho type ⅡC distal clavicle fractures has less postoperative complications and slight complications. It is convenient to remove the internal fixator. The Kirschner wire does not fix the distal clavicle fracture through the acromion, which has little effect on shoulder joint function and can obtain good effectiveness.

Distal third clavicle fractures : a nationwide trainee-led collaborative review of current practice.

AIMS: Distal third clavicle (DTC) fractures are increasing in incidence. Due to their instability and nonunion risk, they prove difficult to treat. Several different operative options for DTC fixation are reported but current evidence suggests variability in operative fixation. Given the lack of consensus, our objective was to determine the current epidemiological trends in DTC as well as their management within the UK. METHODS: A multicentre retrospective cohort collaborative study was conducted. All patients over the age of 18 with an isolated DTC fracture in 2019 were included. Demographic variables were recorded: age; sex; side of injury; mechanism of injury; modified Neer classification grading; operative technique; fracture union; complications; and subsequent procedures. Baseline characteristics were described for demographic variables. Categorical variables were expressed as frequencies and percentages. RESULTS: A total of 859 patients from 18 different NHS trusts (15 trauma units and three major trauma centres) were included. The mean age was 57 years (18 to 99). Overall, 56% of patients (n = 481) were male. The most common mechanisms of injury were simple fall (57%; n = 487) and high-energy fall (29%; n = 248); 87% (n = 748) were treated conservatively and 54% (n = 463) were Neer type I fractures. Overall, 32% of fractures (n = 275) were type II (22% type IIa (n = 192); 10% type IIb (n = 83)). With regards to operative management, 89% of patients (n = 748) who underwent an operation were under the age of 60. The main fixation methods were: hook plate (n = 47); locking plate (n = 34); tightrope (n = 5); and locking plate and tight rope (n = 7). CONCLUSION: Our study is the largest epidemiological review of DTC fractures in the UK. It is also the first to review the practice of DTC fixation. Most fractures are being treated nonoperatively. However, younger patients, suffering a higher-energy mechanism of injury, are more likely to undergo surgery. Hook plates are the predominantly used fixation method followed by locking plate. The literature is sparse on the best method of fixation for optimal outcomes for these patients. To answer this, a pragmatic RCT to determine optimal fixation method is required.Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(12):953-959.

Hook Plate Versus Distal Locking Plate for the Fixation of Unstable Distal Clavicle Injuries, Outcomes and Complications: A Meta-Analysis.

Numerous interventions are advised for the surgical management of distal clavicle fractures. Hook plate (HP) and distal locking plate (DLP) are among the commonly used techniques; nonetheless, no single procedure is deemed to be the benchmark treatment. Thus, the aim of the study is to conduct a comparative analysis, hopefully, to recommend the superior method between the two operations. PubMed, Embase via Ovid and Web of science were electronically searched between January 2000 and to date for studies directly comparing HP to DLP. Comparative retrospective/prospective and randomized studies were incorporated. Constant-Murley score "CMS" at a minimum of 12 months, pain visual analogue scale "VAS", coracoclavicular distance "CCD" and reported complications were analysed. Review manager software was used for the statistical analyses. The total number of patients was 523; 274 (52.3%) with HP and 249 (47.6%) with DLP, 81 of which were associated with CC reconstruction. The mean follow up was 38.7 and 37.03 months for HP and DLP, respectively. CMS leaned towards the DLP group with no statistically significant difference (P=0.06). VAS was in favour of the DLP with again no statistically significant difference (P=0.12). In terms of CCD, the comparison favoured the HP with a lesser CCD postoperatively and a statistically significant difference (P<0.05). Complications were significantly higher in the HP group (P<0.0001). Contrary to our hypothesis, though HP did show a better radiological outcome; nonetheless, DLP did demonstrate a better functional result with a lesser rate of complications and the ability to retain the implant avoiding a second surgery.

Comparing the Efficacy of Anatomical Locked Plate Fixation with Coracoclavicular Ligament Augmentation to Hook Plate Fixation in Treating Distal Clavicle Fractures.

OBJECTIVE: Hook plate fixation is the traditional method for treating distal clavicle fractures. However, in recent years, locked plate applications have emerged as a promising treatment method. This study aimed to compare the short- and mid-term clinical efficacy of anatomical locked plate fixation with coracoclavicular ligament augmentation using anchor nails to that of hook plate fixation in treating distal clavicle fractures. METHODS: This was a retrospective single-center cohort study investigating patients with distal clavicle fractures treated between January 2016 and February 2019 in Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University. Fifty-nine eligible patients who underwent either anatomical locked plate fixation with coracoclavicular ligament augmentation using anchor nails (LPF&CLA group; 20 patients) or clavicle hook plate fixation (CHPF group; 39 patients) were included. The visual analog scale (VAS) and Constant-Murley shoulder scores were used to assess shoulder function. In addition, the coracoclavicular distance between the affected and unaffected shoulders (ΔCC distance) was measured to assess the reduction. Patients were followed up at 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year postoperatively. The comparisons between the two groups were made using Student's t-test, chi-square test, or Fisher's exact test, if appropriate. RESULTS: Preoperative VAS scores were similar in both groups. At 3- and 6-month follow-up, the VAS score was significantly higher in the CHPF group than in the LPF&CLA group. In contrast, the Constant-Murley shoulder score was significantly lower in the CHPF group than in the LPF&CLA group. When the hook plates were removed, there was no statistical difference in both VAS (0.2 ± 0.4 in LPF&CLA group vs. 0.5 ± 0.5 in CHPF group, p = 0.05) and Constant-Murley shoulder (96.1 ± 3.1 in LPF&CLA group vs. 93.8 ± 5.2 in CHPF group, p = 0.08) scores at the last follow-up. Postoperatively, the ΔCC distance was 2.37 ± 1.93 mm in the LPF&CLA group and -1.56 ± 1.34 mm in the CHPF group. One year after surgery, ΔCC distance increased to 3.96 ± 1.17 mm in the LPF&CLA group and to -0.89 ± 1.39 mm in the CHPF group. CONCLUSION: For distal clavicle fractures in which the coracoclavicular ligament is disrupted, anatomical locked plate fixation with coracoclavicular ligament augmentation achieved better functional recovery and less pain than hook plate fixation at the 6-month follow-up. However, the hook plate provided better reduction throughout the follow-up period and shoulder pain could be relieved using removal surgery. Therefore, locked plates with coracoclavicular ligament augmentation favors post-surgery pain relief while harvesting similar functional outcomes to hook plate fixation.

Clinical analysis of the acromial height-measuring device combined with new-type clavicular hook plate and standard clavicular hook plate in the treatment of Neer type II distal clavicle fractures.

BACKGROUND: Distal clavicular fracture is a shoulder joint injury that is common in clinical settings and is generally surgically treated using the clavicular hook plate technique with a confirmed curative effect. However, symptoms, such as shoulder abduction limitation, shoulder discomfort, and postoperative joint pain, may occur in some patients. To overcome these problems, after a previous study we developed an acromial height-measuring device and a new type of clavicular hook plate. This study aimed to investigate whether an acromial height-measuring device combined with an improved new-type clavicular hook plate can better reduce the incidence of complications and improve postoperative function. To provide patients with better treatment effects, an acromion gauge and clavicular hook plate are used. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on 81 patients with distal clavicular fractures admitted to our hospital. They were divided into experimental and control groups according to different plates, and the Constant-Murley score, visual analogue scale score, incidence of acromion osteolysis, and incidence of subacromial impingement syndrome were compared. RESULTS: Compared with the standard clavicular hook plate, the acromial height-measuring device combined with the new-type clavicular hook plate in the treatment of distal clavicle fractures has a lower incidence of subacromial impingement syndrome with better postoperative functional recovery and quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: We considered the acromial height-measuring device combined with the new clavicular hook plate to be a safe and promising alternative to distal clavicular fractures.

The Accuracy of Distal Clavicle Fracture Classifications-Do We Need an Amendment to Imaging Modalities or Fracture Typing?

Background: Despite its fair-to-moderate reliability, the "modified Neer classification" is widely accepted and used. The purpose of this study was to reevaluate its applicability. Methods: Of n = 59 patients with distal clavicle fractures, fractures were classified on standard radiographs. Afterwards, an MRI examination was performed, and fractures reclassified. The primary outcome parameter was quantifying the rate of misclassification. The secondary outcome parameters were the evaluation of the ligamentous injury constellations. Results: In all cases, the fracture course and ligamental integrity could be assigned to the fracture type. Correction of the classification was necessary in n = 5 (8.5%) cases. In n = 3 (5%) cases, a correction was necessary from Neer I to Craig IIc and thus from conservative to operative treatment. Mean coracoclavicular distance (CCD) in Neer I was 10.2 ± 2.1 mm versus 14.2 ± 3.9 mm in Craig IIc (p = 0.02). The mean fracture angle in Neer I was 25.1 ± 3.3° versus 36.8 ± 4.4° in Craig IIc (p = 0.02). Conclusion: Cross-sectional imaging resulted in higher precision. Nevertheless, recommendations remain for standard radiographs. The CCD and fracture angle should be considered. An angle of >30° can be assumed as a parameter of instability. A previously undescribed fracture type does not seem to exist. The modified Neer classification is an appropriate and complete fracture classification.