It Is Necessary to Pay Attention to Where the Pcom Originate from the Aneurysm to Treat with FD.

Objective With the expansion of indications of flow diverter (FD) for cerebral aneurysms, FD placement for posterior communicating artery (Pcom) aneurysms has been approved. However, it is controversial whether Pcom aneurysms should be treated with FD or not. In this study, we report the outcome of FD treatment for Pcom aneurysms in Japan. Materials and Methods We retrospectively analyzed 36 patients with 38 aneurysms treated with FD placement for Pcom aneurysms between 2015 and 2021 in our hospital. We divided our cases into complete occlusion (CO) and non-CO groups. And we extracted contributing factors to CO using multivariate analysis. We also compared the complications rate among the three types of FDs. Results CO was obtained in 29 cases (79.3%), and complications were observed in 3 cases (7.9%). Multivariate analysis revealed that the type of Pcom branch from the aneurysmal dome was a significant factor contributing to CO (odds ratio: 0.0052, 95% confidence interval 0.000048-0.584, p = 0.029). In terms of complications, complication rate was significantly higher in the Flow-Redirection Endoluminal Device (FRED) group ( p = 0.0491). Conclusion The outcome for Pcom aneurysms treated by FD was acceptable. When treating, we must pay attention to where Pcom originates. Achieving CO with FD is difficult for aneurysms where the Pcom branches from the dome. Furthermore, when treating Pcom aneurysms with FRED, it is necessary to be careful about thromboembolic complications.

Intracranial Aneurysms Managed by Parent Artery Reconstruction Using Tubridge Flow Diverter study: 1-year outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: Previous randomized controlled trials have reported a significantly higher occlusion rate of large and giant aneurysms when utilizing the Tubridge flow diverter (FD). In the present trial, the safety and efficacy of the Tubridge FD in treating unruptured internal carotid artery (ICA) or vertebral artery (VA) aneurysms were assessed in a real-world setting. METHODS: The Intracranial Aneurysms Managed by Parent Artery Reconstruction Using Tubridge Flow Diverter (IMPACT) study is a prospective, multicenter, single-arm clinical trial assessing the efficacy of the Tubridge FD in the management of unruptured aneurysms located in the ICA or VA. The primary endpoint was the complete occlusion (Raymond-Roy class 1) rate at the 1-year follow-up. The secondary endpoints included the technical success rate, the successful occlusion rate of the aneurysm, which is the degree of aneurysm embolization scored as Raymond-Roy class 1 or 2, major (> 50%) in-stent stenosis, and incidence of disabling stroke or neurological death associated with the target aneurysms. RESULTS: This study included 14 interventional neuroradiology centers, with 200 patients and 240 aneurysms. According to angiographic core laboratory assessment, 205 (85.4%) aneurysms were located in the ICA, 34 (14.2%) in the VA, and 1 (0.4%) in the middle cerebral artery. Additionally, 189 (78.8%) aneurysms were small (< 10 mm). At the 12-month follow-up, the total occlusion rate was 79.0% (166/210, 95% CI 72.91%-84.34%). Additionally, the occurrence of disabling stroke or neurological death related to the specified aneurysms was 1% (2/200). CONCLUSIONS: The 1-year results from the IMPACT trial affirm the safety record of use of the Tubridge FD in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms in real-world scenarios. These results reveal low morbidity and mortality rates of 3.5% and 1.5%, respectively. Furthermore, they provide evidence of the effectiveness of the Tubridge FD, as demonstrated by the complete occlusion achieved in 166 of 210 (79%) cases.

Impact of Various Non-Contrast-Enhanced MRA Techniques on Lumen Visibility in Vascular Flow Models with a Surpass Evolve Flow Diverter.

BACKGROUND: Silent MRA has shown promising results in evaluating the stents used for intracranial aneurysm treatment. A deep learning-based denoising and deranging algorithm was recently introduced by GE HealthCare. The purpose of this study was to compare the performance of several MRA techniques regarding lumen visibility in silicone models with flow diverter stents. METHODS: Two Surpass Evolve stents of different sizes were implanted in two silicone tubes. The tubes were placed in separate boxes in the straight position and in two different curve configurations and connected to a pulsatile pump to construct a flow loop. Using a 3.0T MRI scanner, TOF and silent MRA images were acquired, and deep learning reconstruction was applied to the silent MRA dataset. The intraluminal signal intensity in the stent (SIin-stent), in the tube outside the stent (SIvessel), and of the background (SIbg) were measured for each scan. RESULTS: The SIin-stent/SIbg and SIin-stent/SIv ratios were higher in the silent scans and DL-based reconstructions than in the TOF images. The stent tips created severe artefacts in the TOF images, which could not be observed in the silent scans. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that the DL reconstruction algorithm improves the quality of the silent MRA technique in evaluating the flow diverter stent patency.

Dual Antiplatelet Non-Responder: Resistance to Clopidogrel and Ticagrelor.

Background: Dual antiplatelet therapy is often required for neurointerventional procedures, especially when a stent or flow diverter is placed in the cervical and intracranial vessels. Patients are usually started on aspirin and clopidogrel given the simplicity of the once daily regimen with reasonable cost. Unfortunately, about a third of patients do not show the desired antiplatelet response to clopidogrel and another agent needs to be introduced. Ticagrelor is a potent antiplatelet medication that has a favorable pharmacological profile and has emerged as a reliable alternative to clopidogrel in recent years. Despite ticagrelor non-responders being rare, they do exist, and identification of these patients is important. Results: A 74-year-old female was incidentally found to harbor a right posterior communicating aneurysm which was successfully treated electively with stent-assisted coiling. Platelet inhibition testing revealed non-responsiveness to Clopidogrel. Ticagrelor was initiated but the patient's platelet reactivity unit remained in the normal range. Management algorithms to maximize a patient's ticagrelor response by facilitating enteral absorption were applied but no platelet inhibition was achieved. The patient was eventually identified as a true ticagrelor non-responder. Conclusion: Resistance to antiplatelet medication can result in devastating complications with permanent neurological deficits. Ticagrelor non-responders are rare but do exist. Platelet inhibition testing should be part of the preprocedural workup for neurointerventions.

Preclinical in vitro and in vivo results of the new silk vista flow diverter with P8RI coating.

BACKGROUND: Flow diverting stents (FDS) have transformed the treatment of intracranial aneurysms; however, their metallic structure associated with their intra-luminal positioning hamper angiographic and clinical outcomes. Therefore, there is a need to develop FDS with optimized surfaces that reduce thrombogenicity while promoting the healing process and endothelialization. METHODS: P8RI, a peptide mimicking the CD31 protein, was previously developed and grafted onto Silk Vista (SV) FDS. P8RI-SV and bare-SV were used in vitro in a blood loop model to test their hemocompatibility using human whole blood and in vivo using the rabbit elastase model for optical coherence tomography (OCT) comparisons of neointimal formation at day 5 and day 28. RESULTS: After blood loop incubation, P8RI-SV showed significant reduction in fibrin binding (p=0.004) and platelet adhesion (p=0.041) compared with bare-SV. Similarly, derivative markers measured in blood, thromboxane B2 (platelet activation) and Thrombin-Antithrombin III complexes (coagulation activation), were also significantly reduced in the P8RI-SV group (both p=0.002). In vivo, complete or near-complete occlusion was reached in all aneurysms (n=6) at day 28. Excellent rate of stent-coverage ratio was obtained at day 5 (89.3% (79.1%-98.7%)) comparable to the observation at day 28 (91.8% (79.1%-100%); p=0.44). These rates were significantly higher compared with bare-SV at day 5 (77.8% (58.3%-86.8%); p<0.001) and at day 28 (67.7% (52.6%-88.9%); p<0.0001). CONCLUSION: In vitro results confirm enhanced hemocompatibility with a significant anti-thrombotic effect of the P8RI-SV. In vivo results provide evidence of rapid neo-intimal growth reaching near-complete tissue healing as early as day 5 in a rabbit model.

Comparing the safety and effectiveness of overlapping stents with flow diverters for unruptured vertebral artery dissecting aneurysms.

BACKGROUND: Endovascular treatment for vertebral artery dissecting aneurysms (VADAs) includes overlapping stents and flow diverters. This study compared the safety and effectiveness of overlapping stents and flow diverters for unruptured VADAs. METHODS: We retrospectively enrolled patients with unruptured VADAs who underwent overlapping stents or flow diverters at two tertiary hospitals in South Korea. The primary clinical outcome was the occurrence of stroke. The primary angiographic outcomes (>12 months) were categorized as regression, no decrease in size, recanalization, or stent occlusion, of which only regression was defined as a favorable angiographic outcomes. RESULTS: Of the 146 patients with VADAs, 25 (17.1%) had flow diverters and 121 (82.9%) had overlapping stents. For the primary angiographic outcomes over 12 months, the rate of favorable angiographic outcomes for flow diverters was 81.8% and for overlapping stents (triple stents) was 98.8% (P=0.006). In the multivariale analysis, after adjusting for partially thrombosed aneurysms, aneurysm shape, non-dominant vessel, posterior inferior cerebellar artery involvement, and procedure type, overlapping stents (triple stents) was not associated with favorable angiographic outcomes compared with flow diverters (OR 7.040, 95% CI 0.549 to 90.294; P=0.134), but partially thrombosed aneurysms was inversely associated with favorable angiographic outcomes (OR 0.056, 95% CI 0.005 to 0.589; P=0.016). The primary clinical outcome followed up to the last angiography did not occur in all patients. CONCLUSION: There was no difference in safety and effectiveness between overlapping stents and flow diverters in unruptured VADAs. Further endovascular treatment studies are needed regarding the association of partially thrombosed aneurysms with unfavorable angiographic outcomes.

Ruptured Vertebral Artery Dissection Treated with Endovascular Intervention.

OBJECTIVE: A retrospective study of cases of endovascular treatment of dissection of the vertebral artery with subarachnoid hemorrhage was conducted. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Data were 11 cases of vertebral artery dissecting aneurysm (VADA) among 291 consecutive subarachnoid hemorrhage patients who underwent clipping or endovascular treatment at Ota Memorial Hospital. Classified into 4 patterns based on the location of the dissection and posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA): pre-PICA, post-PICA, involved PICA, and non-PICA. And one of the cases had bilateral vertebral artery dissection, and computational fluid dynamics analysis was included in the study. RESULTS: Ruptured VADA occurred in 11 of the 291 patients (3.8%). Endovascular treatment was performed in 8 of these 11 patients. Postoperative diffusion-weighted imaging detected no high-intensity lesions and no postoperative ischemic complications or rebleeding occurred in any patient. In a case of bilateral VADA, computational fluid dynamics analysis of very low or high wall shear stress at the dissection, low aneurysm formation indicator, and high oscillatory shear index may be considered rupture factors. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment strategies for each branching pattern of PICA can prevent rupture and avoid ischemic complications. And prediction of the rupture side is important in patients with bilateral dissection to consider the appropriate treatment and timing.

Stent-to-vessel diameter ratio is associated with in-stent stenosis after flow-diversion treatment of intracranial aneurysms.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Flow-diversion treatment for intracranial aneurysms has been associated with the development of in-stent stenosis (ISS) for unclear reasons. We assess whether the size of the stent relative to that of the vessel (the stent-to-vessel diameter ratio, or SVR) may be predictive of the development of ISS after treatment with flow diverters. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients with unruptured intracranial aneurysms who underwent flow-diversion treatment using either the Pipeline or Tubridge embolization device from September 2018 to September 2022. The relationship between SVR and ISS was analyzed. Multiple logistic regression models were used to determine the significant predictors. RESULTS: A total of 458 patients with 481 aneurysms were included. In a mean angiographic follow-up of 10.73 ± 3.97 months, ISS was detected in 68 cases (14.1 %). After adjusting for candidate variables, a higher distal SVR (DSVR) was associated with an increased risk of ISS (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 3.420, 95 % confidence interval [CI] = 1.182 - 9.889, p = 0.023). We conducted a subgroup analysis of the two different flow diverters to assess the effects of their individual characteristics. Our results showed a significant association between the DSVR and the incidence of ISS in both the Pipeline (aOR = 4.033, 95 % CI = 1.156-14.072, p = 0.029) and Tubridge groups (aOR = 11.981, 95 % CI=1.005-142.774, p = 0.049). CONCLUSION: A higher DSVR was associated with an increased risk of ISS. This may help neurointerventionalists select an appropriate stent size when conducting flow-diversion treatment for intracranial aneurysms.

Endovascular Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysm: The Importance of the Rheological Model in Blood Flow Simulations.

Hemodynamics in intracranial aneurysm strongly depends on the non-Newtonian blood behavior due to the large number of suspended cells and the ability of red blood cells to deform and aggregate. However, most numerical investigations on intracranial hemodynamics adopt the Newtonian hypothesis to model blood flow and predict aneurysm occlusion. The aim of this study was to analyze the effect of the blood rheological model on the hemodynamics of intracranial aneurysms in the presence or absence of endovascular treatment. A numerical investigation was performed under pulsatile flow conditions in a patient-specific aneurysm with and without the insertion of an appropriately reconstructed flow diverter stent (FDS). The numerical simulations were performed using Newtonian and non-Newtonian assumptions for blood rheology. In all cases, FDS placement reduced the intra-aneurysmal velocity and increased the relative residence time (RRT) on the aneurysmal wall, indicating progressive thrombus formation and aneurysm occlusion. However, the Newtonian model largely overestimated RRT values and consequent aneurysm healing with respect to the non-Newtonian models. Due to the non-Newtonian blood properties and the large discrepancy between Newtonian and non-Newtonian simulations, the Newtonian hypothesis should not be used in the study of the hemodynamics of intracranial aneurysm, especially in the presence of endovascular treatment.

Evaluation of flow diverters for cerebral aneurysm therapy: recommendations for imaging analyses in clinical studies, endorsed by ESMINT, ESNR, OCIN, SILAN, SNIS, and WFITN.

BACKGROUND: Multiple studies and meta-analyses have described the technical and clinical outcomes in large cohorts of aneurysm patients treated with flow diverters (FDs). Variations in evaluation methodology complicate making comparisons among studies, hinder understanding of the device behavior, and pose an obstacle in the assessment of further advances in FD therapy. METHODS: A multidisciplinary panel of neurointerventionalists, imaging experts, and neuroradiologists convened with the goal of establishing consensus recommendations for the standardization of image analyses in FD studies. RESULTS: A standardized methodology is proposed for evaluating and reporting radiological outcomes of FD treatment of intracranial aneurysms. The recommendations include general imaging considerations for clinical studies and evaluations of longitudinal changes, such as neointimal lining and stenosis. They cover standards for classification of aneurysm location, morphology, measurements, as well as the assessment of aneurysm occlusion, wall apposition, and neck coverage. These reporting standards further define four specific braid deformation patterns: foreshortening, fish-mouthing, braid bump deformation, and braid collapse, collectively termed 'F2B2'. CONCLUSIONS: When widely applied, standardization of methods of measuring and reporting outcomes will help to harmonize the assessment of treatment outcomes in clinical studies, help facilitate communication of results among specialists, and help enable research and development to focus on specific aspects of FD techniques and technology.

Treatment Outcomes of PED for Unruptured Aneurysms of Internal Carotid Artery: Comparison of PED-Flex and PED-Shield.

There is a lack of data regarding the safety and effectiveness of implanting the Pipeline Embolization Device with Shield technology (PED-Shield) compared with the previous generation of Pipeline (PED-Flex). This retrospective single-center study aimed to compare treatment outcomes between the PED-Shield and PED-Flex for treating unruptured internal carotid artery aneurysms. The PED-Flex was used in 62 procedures (67 aneurysms, 59 patients) and the PED-Shield in 53 procedures (59 aneurysms, 58 patients). The mean aneurysm diameter was significantly lower in the PED-Shield group than in the PED-Flex group (11.9 ± 7.0 mm vs. 15.2 ± 6.9 mm, p < 0.001). At the 12-month follow-up, the complete angiographic occlusion rate was 72.1% and 72.3% in the PED-Flex and PED-Shield groups, respectively (p = 0.9808). Limited to aneurysms larger than 10 mm, 70.6% and 68.0%, respectively (p = 0.8175). The incidence of more than three high signal intensity areas on diffusion-weighted imaging after treatment was significantly lower in the PED-Shield group than in the PED-Flex group (27.7% vs. 67.7%; p < 0.001). Limited to aneurysms larger than 10 mm, 41.1% and 69.6%, respectively (p < 0.0117). Symptomatic ischemic complications occurred within 30 days of four PED-Flex procedures (6.5%) and one PED-Shield procedure (2.0%) (p = 0.2315). Limited to aneurysms larger than 10 mm, 1.8% and 3.2%, respectively (p = 0.6677). The incidence of mRS score worsening at 6 months was 3.2% and 1.9% in the PED-Flex and PED-Shield groups, respectively (p = 0.6534). The PED-Shield can achieve outcomes equivalent to or better than the PED-Flex. Further large-scale studies are warranted to confirm our findings.

Exploring the relationship between case volume and intracranial aneurysm treatments with flow-diverters and flow-disruptors: Insights from the 2020 to 2021 Database of the German Society for Interventional Radiology National Registry in Germany.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Intracranial aneurysm treatment using flow-diverters and flow-disruptors requires a higher level of expertise when compared to more traditional methods. Our hypothesis was that the procedural success and the rate of complications are dependent on the annual case load of a center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Conducting a retrospective analysis on the Database of the German Society for Interventional Radiology for the years 2020 to 2021, we examined flow-diverter and flow-disruptor procedures. We categorized centers into four groups according to their annual case load and proceeded to analyze success rates, complication rates, and fluoroscopy times across these centers. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were observed among the groups in both flow-diverter and flow-disruptor cases concerning fluoroscopy time and the incidence of technical complications. However, within the subgroup of flow-disruptor cases, centers with lower case load exhibited significantly higher rates of hemorrhagic and clinically relevant complications. Additionally, it was noted that the rate of therapeutic success in the flow-diverter group significantly increased in centers with higher case volumes. CONCLUSION: Our findings support the intention towards centralization of medical care especially for complex neuroendovascular procedures. Furthermore, our findings are an argument to further develop a standardized educational and procedural algorithm based on defined case numbers and training modules for complex neurovascular procedures as already implemented by the Database of the German Society for Interventional Radiology.

Evaluation of flow diverter use in acutely ruptured vertebral artery dissecting Aneurysms: A focus on safety and efficacy for rapid Aneurysm obliteration.

OBJECTIVE: Flow diverter device (FDD) has emerged as the reconstruction technique for treating ruptured dissecting vertebral artery Aneurysms (VADA), but data on feasibility regarding re-rupture risk and timing of Aneurysm obliteration following FDD treatment is still limited. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of FDD in the treatment of VADAs presenting with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients with ruptured VADA presenting with subarachnoid hemorrhage who underwent FDD placement at our institution between 2015 and 2023. Patient demographic data, Aneurysm configuration, and occlusion status were analyzed. RESULTS: Thirteen patients with SAH from VADA rupture underwent FDD implantation. The average size of the largest diameter of the Aneurysm was 11.2 mm (range 6.5-21 mm). Eight of 13 (61.5 %) patients had their Aneurysms completely obliterated within 2 weeks after the procedure. The small dissecting Aneurysm (d = 0.636, p = 0.002) and degree of intra-Aneurysmal contrast stasis (d = 0.524, p = 0.026) were associated with rapid Aneurysm occlusion, according to the Somer's d coefficient. There were no ischemic or hemorrhagic complications at the average clinical follow-up of 28.4 months (range 5-67 months) and average angiographic follow-up of 20.1 months (range 3-60 months). A favorable outcome (mRS 0-2) was achieved in 12 patients (92.3 %). CONCLUSIONS: FDD is safe and effective for the reconstruction of acutely ruptured VADAs. In addition, our study emphasizes that small dissecting Aneurysms tend to be rapidly obliterated after flow diversion, which eliminates the risk of re-rupture during the acute phase of subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Quantitative analysis of hemodynamic changes induced by the discrepancy between the sizes of the flow diverter and parent artery.

The efficacy of flow diverters is influenced by the strut configuration changes resulting from size discrepancies between the stent and the parent artery. This study aimed to quantitatively analyze the impact of size discrepancies between flow diverters and parent arteries on the flow diversion effects, using computational fluid dynamics. Four silicone models with varying parent artery sizes were developed. Real flow diverters were deployed in these models to assess stent configurations at the aneurysm neck. Virtual stents were generated based on these configurations for computational fluid dynamics analysis. The changes in the reduction rate of the hemodynamic parameters were quantified to evaluate the flow diversion effect. Implanting 4.0 mm flow diverters in aneurysm models with parent artery diameters of 3.0-4.5 mm, in 0.5 mm increments, revealed that a shift from oversized to undersized flow diverters led to an increase in the reduction rates of hemodynamic parameter, accompanied by enhanced metal coverage rate and pore density. However, the flow diversion effect observed transitioning from oversizing to matching was less pronounced when moving from matching to undersizing. This emphasizes the importance of proper sizing of flow diverters, considering the benefits of undersizing and not to exceed the threshold of advantages.

A clinical comparative study of dual LVIS devices and single flow diversion stenting for the treatment of unruptured V3-V4 vertebral artery dissection.

PURPOSE: This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of using overlapping low-profile visualized intraluminal support (LVIS) devices and flow diversion (FD) for the treatment of unruptured vertebral artery dissection (VAD) in the V3-V4 segments. METHODS: The clinical and imaging data of 71 patients with unruptured VAD in the V3-V4 segments who underwent either dual LVIS stenting (d-LVIS group) or single FD stenting (FD group) at our center from September 2014 to December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: Immediate postoperative angiography revealed no significant difference in the degree of occlusion between the two groups in treating vertebral artery dissecting aneurysms (with or without noncompact coiling). However, the d-LVIS group had significantly higher fluoroscopy exposure time and total radiation exposure dose compared to the FD group. During the perioperative period, two cases of pontine infarction and one case of acute thrombosis were encountered. One patient died from subarachnoid hemorrhage during the follow-up period. For dissecting the aneurysm, angiographic follow-up (8.56 ± 1.96 months) showed similar healing outcomes between the two groups (with or without noncompact coiling). However, seven patients (7/40, 17.5%) showed poor healing and one patient showed mild in-stent stenosis. For simple dissection, angiographic follow-up (8.78 ± 1.83 months) showed patent lumens in both groups, with all dissections healing well, and two patients having mild in-stent stenosis. CONCLUSION: Both methods could effectively treat unruptured VAD in V3-V4 segments. Nevertheless, simple FD implantation is relatively easier to perform and involves lower radiation exposure.

Contour Neurovascular System for endovascular embolization of cerebral aneurysms: a multicenter cohort study of 10 European neurovascular centers.

BACKGROUND: Intrasaccular devices have become increasingly popular in the treatment of cerebral aneurysms, particularly at the bifurcation. Here we evaluate the Contour Neurovascular System, an intrasaccular device for the endovascular treatment of cerebral aneurysms, in a multicenter cohort study, the largest to the best of our knowledge. METHODS: Consecutive patients with intracranial aneurysms treated with the Contour Neurovascular System between February 2017 and October 2022 at 10 European neurovascular centers were prospectively collected and retrospectively reviewed. Patient and aneurysm characteristics, procedural details, and angiographic and clinical outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: During the study period, 279 aneurysms (median age of patients 60 years, IQR 52-68) were treated with Contour. In 83.2% of patients the device was placed electively, whereas the remaining patients were treated in the setting of acute subarachnoid hemorrhage. The most common locations were the middle cerebral artery (26.5%) followed by the anterior communicating region (26.2%). Median aneurysm dome and neck size were 5.2 mm (IQR 4.2-7) and 3.9 mm (IQR 3-5). Contour size 7 (39%) and 9 (25%) were most used. Thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications occurred in 6.8% and 0.4% of aneurysms, respectively. Raymond-Roy 1 and 2 occlusions at last follow-up were achieved in 63.2% and 28.3%, respectively, resulting in adequate occlusion of 91.5% of aneurysms. CONCLUSION: This is the largest multicenter study reporting the outcome on the Contour Neurovascular System. At 1 year, the self-evaluated data on safety and efficacy are comparable to data of existing intrasaccular devices. Contour is a promising technology in the treatment of cerebral aneurysms.

Quantitative evaluation of the effects of flow diverter treatment on aneurysm hemodynamics using time-resolved rotational angiography.

BACKGROUND: There have been immense advancements in the hardware and software of digital subtraction angiography systems over the last several years. These advancements continue to make progress toward the goals of offering better visualization and reducing radiation exposure. A newer advancement in this arena is presenting three-dimension data over time resulting in four-dimensional-digital subtracted angiography visualization. We have evaluated these protocols related to the evaluation of the treatment of intracranial aneurysms with pipeline flow diversion. METHODS: Four-dimensional-digital subtracted angiography imaging was acquired on an Artis Q Biplane angiographic system (Siemens Healthcare AG, Forchheim, Germany). A six second four-dimensional-digital subtracted angiography protocol was performed pre and post flow diverter placement. Pre and post reconstructed images were sent through a dedicated prototype research workstation (Syngo X-Workplace; Siemens Healthineers AG) for further flow evaluation. RESULTS: The treatment of an aneurysm with flow diversion led to a filling delay of 0.278 ± 0.422 s inside the aneurysms, whereas distal to the aneurysms the filling of the vessel segment occurred earlier post procedural (negative filling delay of -0.15 ± 0.31 s. The flow ratio inside the aneurysm decreased to 63.6 ± 23% of its pre-treatment value and distal to the aneurysm the flow remained substantially the same (flow ratio: 95.6 ± 0.29%). Data showed a relative filling delay of the aneurysm normalized to the distal vessel of 0.43 ± 0.36 s. The relative flow ratio of the aneurysm in comparison to the distal parent vessel was 72.2 ± 31%. CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of a four-dimensional-digital subtracted angiography acquisition allows assessment of the effects of flow diversion treatment on aneurysm hemodynamic parameters and shows a significant decrease in flow inside the aneurysm compared to the parent vessel distal to the aneurysm.

Treatment of intracranial aneurysms with large-diameter (≥5.5 mm) Derivo Embolization Devices, with particular focus on 7 and 8 mm diameter devices.

OBJECTIVE: There are few studies on flow diverters with diameters >5 mm. We present our preliminary experience with the 5.5-8 mm Derivo Embolization Device (DED) implants for the treatment of cerebral aneurysms. METHODS: A consecutive series of 26 patients (median age: 60 years) treated for 32 aneurysms in 26 procedures was retrospectively analyzed for procedural characteristics, complications, and mid-term angiographic results. RESULTS: The median aneurysm size was 10.5 mm, 2 of 30 (6%) aneurysms were ruptured and 9 (28%) had a fusiform or dissecting morphology. DED implantation was performed in the internal carotid artery in 18 of 26 (69%) procedures and in the vertebrobasilar artery in 8 (31%). Device deployment failed in 1 (4%) procedure. The 7 and 8 mm implants were successfully deployed in 5 cases. Additional balloon angioplasty or stent implantation was performed in 3 (12%) cases to improve wall apposition. Complications included 1 (4%) major stroke and 2 (8%) minor strokes. Angiographic follow up at a mean of 6 months showed complete occlusion in 8 of30 (27%) aneurysms and favorable occlusion in 14 (47%). CONCLUSIONS: The use of large diameter DEDs was safe and feasible. The mid-term occlusion rates are acceptable considering the complex subset of aneurysms studied. Further studies are warranted to define the indications for large-diameter DEDs and to evaluate their long-term efficacy.

Evaluation of Hemodynamic Alterations after Flow Diverter Placement using the AneurysmFlowTM tool.

Background: AneurysmFlow (Phillips Healthcare) is the flow measurement tool, utilizing an optical flow-based algorithm from DSA, lacks sufficient published studies. This study aimed to assess the significance of flow velocity changes and the Mean Aneurysm Flow Amplitude (MAFA) ratio in evaluating outcomes following flow-diverting treatments. Methods: Between June 2021 and October 2022, 41 patients with 42 aneurysms underwent FDS treatment with AneurysmFlow measu-rement at the Bach Mai Radiology Center. Results: The tool achieved a 90.5% success rate in 38 out of 42 patients. Most aneurysms (89.5%) were small to medium-sized (<10 mm), and a decrease in flow velocity post-stent deployment was ob-served in 78.9% of cases. Conversely, 21.1% showed increased flow, mainly in aneurysms smaller than 5 mm. No significant association was found between flow changes or MAFA ratio and aneurysm size characteristics. Twenty-two patients (59.5%) underwent re-examination at 6 months, revealing no correlation in MAFA ratio between completely and incompletely occluded aneurysms. Conclusions: Our current investigation, primarily centered on small and medium-sized aneurysms, did not uncover any link between quantitative flow changes assessed using the AneurysmFlow software and the occlusion status of aneurysms at the 6-month follow-up post-flow diverter treatment. Larger case series with extended follow-up imaging are necessary to further explore these findings.

Comparison of Pipeline embolization device versus Tubridge embolization device in unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a multicenter, propensity score matched study.

BACKGROUND: Flow diverter devices (FDs) are increasingly used for treating unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs), but limited studies compared different FDs. OBJECTIVE: To conduct a propensity score matched analysis comparing the Pipeline embolization device (PED) and Tubridge embolization device (TED) for UIAs. METHODS: Patients with UIAs treated with either PED or TED between July 2016 and July 2022 were included. Propensity score matching was performed to adjust for age, sex, comorbidities, smoking, drinking, aneurysm size, morphology, neck, location, parent artery diameter, adjunctive coiling, and angiographic follow-up duration. Perioperative complications and clinical and angiographic outcomes were compared after matching. RESULTS: 735 patients treated by PED and 290 patients treated by TED were enrolled. Compared with the PED group, patients in the TED group had a greater number of women and patients with ischemia, a smaller proportion of vertebrobasilar and non-saccular aneurysms, a smaller size and neck, and fewer adjunctive coils and overlapping stents, but a larger parent artery diameter and lumen disparities. After adjusting for these differences, 275 pairs were matched. No differences were found in perioperative complications (4.4% vs 2.5%, P=0.350), in-stent stenosis (16.0% vs 15.6%, P>0.999), or favorable prognosis (98.9% vs 98.5%, P>0.999). However, PED showed a trend towards better complete occlusion over a median 8-month angiographic follow-up (81.8% vs 75.3%, P=0.077). CONCLUSION: Compared with PED, TED provides a comparable rate of perioperative and short-term outcomes. Nevertheless, a better occlusion status in the PED group needs to be further verified over a longer follow-up period.