Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Publication year range
1.
Viszeralmedizin ; 31(2): 112-6, 2015 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26989381

ABSTRACT

Diverticulitis is one of the leading indications for elective colonic resections although there is an ongoing controversial discussion about classification, stage-dependent therapeutic options, and therapy settings. As there is a rising trend towards conservative therapy for diverticular disease even in patients with a complicated form of diverticulitis, we provide a compact overview of current surgical therapy principles and the remaining questions to be answered.

2.
Ann Coloproctol ; 30(5): 216-21, 2014 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25360428

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The role of surgery in the management of diverticular disease after an episode of acute diverticulitis (AD) managed in a conservative form is evolving. Age, number of episodes of AD, type of episode, and symptoms after the episodes are factors related to the need for elective surgery. The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety of conservative management and the risk factors for emergency surgery after a first episode of AD managed without surgery. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 405 patients diagnosed as having had a first episode of AD. Sixty-nine patients underwent emergency surgery on the first admission, and 69 patients had an elective operation in the follow-up (group A). The remaining 267 patients were managed initially without surgery (group B). Thirteen of these 267 patients needed a further urgent surgical procedure. Factors involved in the decision of elective surgery and the probability of emergency surgery after the first episode of AD managed without surgery were evaluated in relation to demographic factors, risk factors, presence of recurrences, and type of the first episode. RESULTS: Patients, mean age was 62.7 years, 71 were aged less than 51, and 151 were males. The mean follow-up for patients with nonoperative management was 91.2 months. An elective operation was performed in 69 patients. Compared to patients in group B, those in group A more frequently had a first episode of complicated acute diverticulitis (CAD) (37.1% vs. 16.4%; P = 0.000) and were more likely to be smokers (46.3% vs. 19.3%; P = 0.000) and to suffer more than one episode of AD (42% vs. 26.9%; P = 0.027). Nonoperative management was chosen for 267 patients, but 13 patients needed an emergency operation later. In the multivariate analysis, we found a significant relation between the presence of CAD in the first episode and the need for emergency surgery. There were no differences in surgical mortality between the patients in the two groups, but patients treated with elective surgery had a higher rate of stoma than patients treated non-operatively (7.2% vs. 1.4%; P = 0.028); this difference was not observed in the subgroup of patients with CAD (15.3% vs. 6.8%; P = 0.458). CONCLUSION: After an episode of AD, nonoperative management is safe because fewer than 5% of patients will need an emergent procedure in a subsequent attack of AD. A first episode of CAD is the only risk factor for emergency surgery in patients managed conservatively.

3.
Annals of Coloproctology ; : 216-221, 2014.
Article in English | WPRIM (Western Pacific) | ID: wpr-192656

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The role of surgery in the management of diverticular disease after an episode of acute diverticulitis (AD) managed in a conservative form is evolving. Age, number of episodes of AD, type of episode, and symptoms after the episodes are factors related to the need for elective surgery. The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety of conservative management and the risk factors for emergency surgery after a first episode of AD managed without surgery. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 405 patients diagnosed as having had a first episode of AD. Sixty-nine patients underwent emergency surgery on the first admission, and 69 patients had an elective operation in the follow-up (group A). The remaining 267 patients were managed initially without surgery (group B). Thirteen of these 267 patients needed a further urgent surgical procedure. Factors involved in the decision of elective surgery and the probability of emergency surgery after the first episode of AD managed without surgery were evaluated in relation to demographic factors, risk factors, presence of recurrences, and type of the first episode. RESULTS: Patients, mean age was 62.7 years, 71 were aged less than 51, and 151 were males. The mean follow-up for patients with nonoperative management was 91.2 months. An elective operation was performed in 69 patients. Compared to patients in group B, those in group A more frequently had a first episode of complicated acute diverticulitis (CAD) (37.1% vs. 16.4%; P = 0.000) and were more likely to be smokers (46.3% vs. 19.3%; P = 0.000) and to suffer more than one episode of AD (42% vs. 26.9%; P = 0.027). Nonoperative management was chosen for 267 patients, but 13 patients needed an emergency operation later. In the multivariate analysis, we found a significant relation between the presence of CAD in the first episode and the need for emergency surgery. There were no differences in surgical mortality between the patients in the two groups, but patients treated with elective surgery had a higher rate of stoma than patients treated non-operatively (7.2% vs. 1.4%; P = 0.028); this difference was not observed in the subgroup of patients with CAD (15.3% vs. 6.8%; P = 0.458). CONCLUSION: After an episode of AD, nonoperative management is safe because fewer than 5% of patients will need an emergent procedure in a subsequent attack of AD. A first episode of CAD is the only risk factor for emergency surgery in patients managed conservatively.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Demography , Diverticulitis , Diverticulitis, Colonic , Emergencies , Follow-Up Studies , Mortality , Multivariate Analysis , Recurrence , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors
4.
Article in Korean | WPRIM (Western Pacific) | ID: wpr-14353

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Because of the difficulties in making the preoperative diagnosis of diverticulitis, most patients with cecal diverticulitis have been operated on under the preoperative diagnosis of acute appendicitis. However, controversy about the treatment exists when physicians are confronted with a cecal diverticulitis. The purpose of this study is to investigate the proper treatment of cecal diverticulitis that's misdiagnosed as acute appendicitis. METHODS: We reviewed 58 cases of cecal diverticulitis that underwent emergency operation as acute appendicitis, according to classified option of treatment. RESULTS: Of the 58 patients (82.8%), 48 were treated by appendectomy without manipulation of the cecal diverticulitis (conservative treatment, CT group), and 10 cases (17.2%) were treated by surgical resection (diverticulectomy or segmental resection of bowel) of the cecal diverticulitis (operative treatment, OT group). The difference of demographic figures was not significant between the CT and OT groups (P>0.05). However, the length of the postoperative hospital stay and the rate of complications were statistically superior for the CT group (mean hospital stay: 7.5+/-2.1 days; rate of complications: n=2/48; 4.2%) compared to the OT group (mean hospital stay: 14.0+/-7.5 days, rate of complication: n= 3/10; 30.0%) (P0.05). CONCLUSION: Given the above clinical results, we could suggest that appendectomy with postoperative antibiotic therapy is an effective management strategy for cecal diverticulitis that's misdiagnosed as acute appendicitis.


Subject(s)
Humans , Appendectomy , Appendicitis , Cecum , Diagnosis , Diverticulitis , Emergencies , Length of Stay , Recurrence
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...