The comparison of postoperative outcomes in Morton's neuroma excision between plantar versus dorsal approach: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Current literature lacks comprehensive information comparing the clinical outcomes of plantar and dorsal approaches for Civinini-Morton syndrome, also known as Morton's neuroma. This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate and compare the clinical outcomes of neurectomy for Morton's neuroma, focusing on the differences between the plantar and dorsal approach. METHODS: Our comprehensive literature review adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and utilized databases including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library. Data investigated in this study included postoperative sensory loss, scar tenderness, reoperation, histopathology, complications, pain score, patient satisfaction, functional scores, and time to weight bearing. RESULTS: Total eight studies were included in this study. In aggregate, 237 neuromas underwent excision using the plantar approach, while 312 neuromas were treated via the dorsal approach. A significantly higher rate of postoperative reduced sensory was found in the dorsal group: 48.5 % (64/132) Vs. 62.0 % (80/129) with the relative ratio (RR) of 0.79 (95 % CI, 0.64-0.97). A significantly higher rate of postoperative scar tenderness was noted in the plantar group: 16.7 % (32/192) Vs. 6.2 % (14/225) with the RR of 2.27 (95 % CI, 1.28-4.04). Regarding the histopathology, 99.3 % (143/144) and 97.1 % (134/138) accuracy rate was confirmed in the plantar approach and dorsal approach, respectively, with the RR of 1.02 (95 % CI, 0.98-1.07). Overall reoperations and complications were not different between groups at 5.3 % (10/189) and 8.8 % (19/216) in the plantar group versus 6.1 % and 12.0 % (35/291) in dorsal group. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend detailed discussions with patients prior to surgery to weigh the advantages and disadvantages of each approach.

Laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy guided by indocyanine green fluorescence: A cranial-dorsal approach.

BACKGROUND: Advancements in laparoscopic technology and a deeper understanding of intrahepatic anatomy have led to the establishment of more precise laparoscopic hepatectomy (LH) techniques. The indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence navigation technique has emerged as the most effective method for identifying hepatic regions, potentially overcoming the limitations of LH. While laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy (LLH) is a standardized procedure, there is a need for innovative strategies to enhance its outcomes. AIM: To investigate a standardized cranial-dorsal strategy for LLH, focusing on important anatomical markers, surgical skills, and ICG staining methods. METHODS: Thirty-seven patients who underwent ICG fluorescence-guided LLH at Qujing Second People's Hospital between January 2019 and February 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The cranial-dorsal approach was performed which involves dissecting the left hepatic vein cephalad, isolating the Arantius ligament , exposing the middle hepatic vein, and dissecting the parenchyma from the dorsal to the foot in order to complete the anatomical LLH. The surgical methods, as well as intra- and post-surgical data, were recorded and analyzed. Our hospital's Medical Ethics Committee approved this study (Ethical review: 2022-019-01). RESULTS: Intraoperative blood loss during LLH was 335.68 ± 99.869 mL and the rates of transfusion and conversion to laparotomy were 13.5% and 0%, respectively. The overall incidence of complications throughout the follow-up (median of 18 months; range 1-36 months) was 21.6%. No mortality or severe complications (level IV) were reported. CONCLUSION: LLH has the potential to become a novel, standardized approach that can effectively, safely, and simply expose the middle hepatic vein and meet the requirements of precision surgery.

Dorsal Approach for Management of Proximal Interphalangeal Joint Flexion Contracture.

Proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint contracture is a common, difficult clinical problem that can arise from minor trauma. Management is difficult because outcomes are unpredictable and often poor, due to residual flexion deformities postoperatively. The dorsal approach for flexion contracture of the PIP joint is not discussed in present literature. In this technique guide, we wish to describe and explain the rationale for a dorsal approach. In our experience, a dorsal approach allows for ease of access to all pathologic structures, with simple positioning of the digit to allow access to volar structures, as well as when addressing more than one digits with a PIP contracture. Finally, similar to the midaxial approach, the dorsal approach also eliminates any volar soft tissue concerns and need for supplemental coverage.

Dorsal approach for isolated volar fracture-dislocation of the base of the second metacarpal: A case report.

BACKGROUND: We report a case with the displacement of an articular fracture fragment of the base of the second metacarpal from the ulnar to the volar side, treated via the dorsal approach. The dorsal approach can be a good option not only because it allows direct observation of ligament damage and fixation of bone fragments but also because the thin subcutaneous tissue makes the approach easier. CASE SUMMARY: A 45-year-old man with a right hand injury visited the hospital. A small bone fragment was identified using plain radiography. Lateral radiography revealed the fragment as lying over the volar aspect of the carpometacarpal (CMC) joint. Computed tomography revealed that approximately one-third of the CMC joint surface of the second metacarpal was damaged. We provisionally diagnosed an intra-articular fracture with significant CMC joint instability and performed open reduction and internal fixation. We made a dorsal longitudinal incision over the CMC joint between the second and third metacarpals. The dorsal ligament of the third CMC joint was torn. We thought it had been dislocated to the volar side and spontaneously reduced to that position. There are only few reports of volar dislocation of CMC joint fractures, particularly of the second and third metacarpals; our report is unique as our patient had an intact interosseous ligament between the second and third metacarpals. CONCLUSION: Although past reports have used a palmar approach, the dorsal approach is a good option for these cases.

Effect of surgical approach on the treatment of Morton's neuroma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Surgical resection of Morton's neuroma includes dorsal and plantar approaches. However, there is no consensus on the choice of approach in clinic. The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the surgical results of dorsal and plantar approaches. METHODS: The literatures of PubMed, Cochrane library, Embase and Web of Science were searched on April 26th, 2023. A systematic review was performed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. The data were extracted after screening the literature and evaluating the quality of the methodology included in the study. The RevMan5.4 software was used to analyze and calculate the OR value and 95% confidence interval. RESULTS: A total of 7 randomized controlled trials and comparative studies were published, of which only 5 were included. There were 158 feet via plantar approach (plantar group, PG) and 189 via dorsal approach (dorsal group, DG). There was no significant difference between PG and DG in overall adverse events, sensory problems, incision infection and deep vein thrombosis (p > 0.05). In terms of scar problems, PG showed more than DG (OR, 2.90[95%CI, 1.40 to 5.98]; p = 0.004). Other outcome indicators such as visual analogue scale (VAS) scores and American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scores were difficult to be included in the comparison. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the relatively low quality and small amount of available evidence, the meta-analysis conducted produces a hypothesis that the frequency of adverse events in surgical treatment of Morton's neuroma, dorsal approach and plantar approach may be the same, but the types are different. More high-level evidence is needed to further verify this hypothesis.

[Distal radius fracture-tactic and approach]. / Distale Radiusfrakturen ­ Taktik und Zugangswahl.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of surgical treatment is fracture healing with restored alignment, rotation, and joint surface. Stable fixation allows for functional postoperative aftercare. INDICATIONS: Displaced intra- and extra-articular fractures which either could not be adequately reduced or in which a secondary displacement is to expected due to instability criteria. The following factors are considered instability criteria: age > 60 years, female, initial dorsal displacement > 20°, dorsal comminution, radial shortening > 5 mm, palmar displacement. CONTRAINDICATIONS: The only absolute contraindication is if the patient is deemed unfit for surgery due to concerns regarding anesthesia. Old age is a relative contraindication, as it is currently debated whether older patients benefit from the operation. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: The surgical technique is guided by the fracture pattern. Palmar plating is most commonly performed. If the joint surface needs to be visualized, a dorsal approach (in combination with another approach or alone) or arthroscopically assisted fixation should be chosen. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: In general, a functional postoperative regime can be carried out after plate fixation with mobilization without weightbearing. Short-term splinting can provide pain relief. Concomitant ligamentous injuries and fixations, which are not stable enough for functional aftercare (such as k­wires) require a longer period of immobilization. RESULTS: Provided the fracture is reduced correctly, osteosynthesis improves functional outcome. The complication rate ranges between 9 and 15% with the most common complication being tendon irritation/rupture and plate removal. Whether surgical treatment holds the same benefits for patients > 65 years as for younger patients is currently under debate.

Combined approach versus single Henry approach for fixation of die-punch distal radius fractures: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Distal radius fracture (DRF) is one of the most common orthopaedic-related traumas. DRF patients with die-punch fractures have a higher risk of loss of reduction, poorer functional outcomes, and increased risk of complications even after open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). According to the three-column theory, the lunate fossa is an important part of the intermediate column for load bearing. When the distal radius fracture involves the lunate fossa, adequate anatomical reduction can have an important impact on the prognosis of wrist function. Herein, we used the combined volar and dorsal approach, and the dorsal approach was used to assist in bone grafting or dorsal plate fixation in reducing fractures. We compare the combined approach versus the Henry approach for the fixation of die-punch distal radius fractures. METHODS: We reviewed patients who were admitted for surgery for die-punch fractures from January 2016 to June 2021. The patients were followed-up after surgery to measure and evaluate their Gartland-Werley wrist score, wrist range of motion (ROM), and follow-up imaging data. RESULTS: There were 21 patients in the volar locking plate (VLP) group and 10 patients in the combined approach group. The majority of fractures in the VLP and combined approach groups were AO B and C fractures, respectively. The cause of injury and AO fracture classification showed significant differences between the two groups, and there was no difference in age or sex between the two groups. There was no significant difference in ROM between the two groups, but the VLP group presented a better Gartland-Werley score and volar tilt angle, and the combined group presented better maintenance in radial height and articular congruity. CONCLUSIONS: Reduction through the combined palmar and dorsal approach supplemented by bone grafting or dorsal plate fixation is an effective method for the treatment of die-punch distal radius fractures, which provides a new option for the treatment of die-punch fractures.

Usefulness of cranio-dorsal approach for laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy.

Most surgeons perform laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy (Lap LLS) using the caudo-peripheral approach (C-P approach). However, recently, a cranio-dorsal approach (C-D approach) has been applied to various types of hepatectomy owing to its advantage of preventing split injury. No studies yet have compared the perioperative outcomes of Lap LLS using each approach. Therefore, this study aimed to determine whether the C-D approach is useful for Lap LLS by comparing its perioperative outcomes with the C-P approach. Data of patients who underwent Lap LLS in our institution between 2010 and 2022 for liver tumors were retrospectively collected. We compared the perioperative outcomes of Lap LLS using a conventional C-P approach, which transects hepatic parenchyma in the caudo-peripheral direction and a C-D approach, which transects hepatic parenchyma in the cranio-caudal direction. All surgeries were performed only by board-certified expert surgeons to minimize technical bias. Furthermore, the perioperative procedures employed at our institution remained unchanged throughout the study period. A total of 36 patients were included in the study (C-P approach, n = 25; C-D approach, n = 11). The C-D approach showed a significantly shorter operation time than the C-P approach (median, 225 min vs. 262 min, p = 0.04). In addition, the C-D approach showed significantly lower blood loss than the C-P approach (median, 20 mL vs. 100 mL, p < 0.01). Other parameters, such as morbidity and hospital stay, were comparable between groups. The C-D approach could offer better surgical outcomes than the conventional C-P approach.

Pain and rehabilitation after total hip arthroplasty are approach dependent: results 6 weeks and 2 years after surgery in a multisurgeon, single-center, and prospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was the evaluation of pain, function, and overall satisfaction after total hip arthroplasty (THA) using three different standard surgical approaches (DAA (direct anterior approach), lateral, and posterior approach) 2 years postoperatively. Additionally, we compared the results with recently published results of the same study population 6 weeks postoperatively. METHODS: In a multisurgeon, prospective, single-center cohort study, a total of initial 188 patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty (THA) between February 2019 and April 2019 were analyzed on pain, function, and satisfaction within the first days, 6 weeks, and 2 years postoperatively according to three different approaches (DAA, lateral, and posterior approach). Our research group recently published results directly and 6 weeks postoperatively. We evaluated the same study collectively 2 years postoperatively and compared the results with the data 6 weeks postoperatively. One hundred twenty-five patients could be included. Outcome parameters for the present study were the pain level according to the visual analogue scale (VAS), the modified Harris hip score (mHHS), and an overall satisfaction scale 2 years postoperatively. RESULTS: Mean overall satisfaction 2 years postoperatively was 9.7 ± 1 (3-10). Satisfaction was significantly better for the DAA than for the lateral approach (p = 0.005). There were no significant differences between the lateral and posterior approaches (p = 0.06) and between the DAA and the posterior approaches (p = 0.11). In total, the mean pain level was 0.4 ± 0.9 (0-5) at 6 weeks and 0.5 ± 1.1 (0-7) at 2 years postoperatively (p = 0.3). Regarding the different approach groups, pain levels 6 weeks and 2 years postoperatively were significantly lower for the DAA than for the lateral approach (p = 0.02). There were no significant differences between DAA and posterior approach (p = 0.05) and the lateral and posterior approach (p = 0.26). The mean mHHS significantly increased from 84.7 + 14.5 (37.4-100) 6 weeks to 95 + 12.5 (23.1-100.1) 2 years postoperatively (p < 0.0001). Regarding the different approaches, mHHS was significantly higher for the DAA than for the lateral approach (p = 0.03). Differences between the DAA and the posterior approach (p = 0.11) and between the lateral and posterior approaches (p = 0.24) were insignificant. CONCLUSION: At 2 years postoperative, DAA showed significantly better overall satisfaction, pain level, and mHHS than the lateral approach. The differences between DAA and the posterior approach and lateral and posterior approaches were insignificant. Whether the superior results of the DAA to the lateral approach persist over a longer period must be clarified by further studies. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study, level of evidence 2.

Minimally Invasive Fixation with Dorsal Suspension Button and Volar Plate in Distal Radius Fractures with Dorsal Die Punch Fragments: A Preliminary Study.

Objective The objective of the study is to analyze the clinical and radiological results obtained using a minimally invasive fixation technique with a volar locking plate and a suspension system with a dorsal button in distal articular radius fractures with dorsal comminution. Materials and Methods Six patients with distal radius fractures, between 19 and 68 years of age, were included in the study. Mean follow-up was of 15 weeks. Range of motion (ROM) in flexion, extension, radial deviation, ulnar deviation, pronation, supination, the strength in kilograms, and values on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH), and Mayo Wrist Score (MWS) scales were evaluated at 4, 8, and 12 weeks postoperative. Correction of anteroposterior diameter of the radius and concordance between postoperative anteroposterior diameter and the contralateral wrist diameter were evaluated radiologically. Results The following mean values were obtained at 12 weeks postoperative: ROM in flexion: 40.5°, ROM in extension: 49.5°, ROM in radial deviation: 24.5°, ROM in ulnar deviation: 15°, ROM in pronation: 87°, ROM in supination: 89°, strength: 37.5 kg, pain in VAS scale: 2 points, DASH: 54.5 points, and MWS: 67.5 points. At 12 weeks postoperative, the mean correction of anteroposterior diameter was 0.49 mm. The anteroposterior diameter and that of the contralateral wrist were strongly correlated. Conclusion Fixation with the volar locking plate and dorsal suspension button could be considered an alternative to dorsal plate fixation for treatment of distal radius fractures with comminution or associated dorsal die punch fragments.

WITHDRAWN: Long-term follow-up results of a dorsal approach to complex dorsal metacarpophalangeal dislocation.

PURPOSE: The present study aimed to examine the dorsal approach to complex MCP joint dislocation and to compare our clinical results with others reported in the literature.This article has been withdrawn at the request of the author(s) and/or editor. The Publisher apologizes for any inconvenience this may cause. The full Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal can be found at https://www.elsevier.com/about/policies/article-withdrawal

Post-operative dysphagia following ventral cervical approach: complication or side-effect? Retrospective analysis and review of the literature.

OBJECTIVE: To ameliorate the clinical decision-making process when debating between a ventral or dorsal cervical approach by elucidating whether post-operative dysphagia be regarded as a complication or a transient side effect. METHODS: A literature review of studies comparing complication rates following ventral and dorsal cervical approaches was performed. A stratified complication rate excluding dysphagia was calculated and discussed. A retrospective cohort of patients operated for degenerative cervical myelopathy in a single institution comprising 665 patients was utilized to analyze complication rates using a uniform definition for dysphagia. RESULTS: Both the ventral and the dorsal approach groups exhibited comparable neurological improvement rates. Since transient dysphagia was not considered a complication, the dorsal approach was associated with higher level of overall complications. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Inconsistencies in the definition of dysphagia following ventral cervical surgery impedes the interpretation of trials comparing dorsal and ventral complication rates. A uniform definition for complications and side effects may enhance the validity of medical trials.

Caudodorsal approach combined with in situ split for laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy (LRPS) was technically challenging and lack of standardization. There were some approaches for LRPS, such as caudal approach and dorsal approach. During our practice, we initiated pure LRPS using the caudodorsal approach with in situ split and present several advantages of this method. METHODS: From April 2018 to December 2021, consecutive patients who underwent pure LRPS using the caudodorsal approach with in situ split at our institution entered into this retrospective study. The key point of the caudodorsal approach was that the right hepatic vein was exposed from peripheral branches toward the root and the parenchyma was transected from the dorsal side to ventral side. Specially, the right perihepatic ligaments were not divided to keep the right liver in situ before parenchymal dissection for each case. RESULTS: 11 patients underwent pure LRPS using the caudodorsal approach with in situ split. There were 9 hepatocellular carcinoma, 1 sarcomatoid hepatocellular carcinoma, and 1 hepatic hemangioma. Five patients had mild cirrhosis and 1 had moderate cirrhosis. All the procedures were successfully completed laparoscopically. The median operative time was 375 min (range of 290-505 min) and the median blood loss was 300 ml (range of 100-1000 ml). Five patients received perioperative blood transfusion, of which 1 patient received autologous blood transfusion and 2 patients received blood transfusion due to preoperative moderate anemia. No procedure was converted to open surgery. Two patients who suffered from postoperative complications, improved after conservative treatments. The median postoperative stay was 11 days (range of 7-25 days). No postoperative bleeding, hepatic failure, and mortality occurred. CONCLUSION: The preliminary clinical effect of the caudodorsal approach with in situ split for LRPS was satisfactory. Our method was feasible and expected to provide ideas for the standardization of LRPS. Further researches are required due to some limitations of this study.

Analysis of left hepatolithiasis treated with cranial-dorsal approach laparoscopic anatomic left hemihepatectomy / 中华肝胆外科杂志

Objective:To study the safety and feasibility of anatomic left hemihepatectomy via cranial-dorsal approach in the treatment of left hepatolithiasis.Methods:Clinical data of 47 patients with left intrahepatic bile duct stones who underwent cranial-dorsal approach laparoscopic anatomic left hemihepatectomy in Hunan People's Hospital from October 2016 to June 2022 were retrospectively analyzed, including 15 males and 32 females, aged (56.45±1.37) years old. The operative time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative liver function and complications were analyzed. Patients were followed up by telephone and outpatient review.Results:All 47 patients successfully underwent laparoscopic surgery without conversion. The median operative time was 260 (range, 160-440) min. The median intraoperative blood loss was 100 ml (range, 20-400 ml). The total bilirubin, alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels were 15.7 (11.7, 21.9) μmol/L, 126.6 (91.7, 168.5) U/L, and 151.1 (98.0, 212.4) U/L on postoperative day (POD) 1, respectively, and decreased to 12.6 (9.6, 16.2) μmol/L, 97.9 (60.7, 156.9) U/L, 54.2 (40.0, 104.1) U/L on POD 3, respectively. The median postoperative hospital stay was 7 (range, 4-24) d. Postoperative abdominal effusion and infection occurred in one patient, and the complication rate was 2.1% (1/47). Postoperative CT review found residual stones in common bile duct in one patient [2.1% (1/47)]. No stone recurrence or death occurred during postoperative follow-up.Conclusion:Anatomic left hemihepatectomy via cranial-dorsal approach is a safe and feasible surgery for the treatment of left hepatolithiasis.

Palmar lunate dislocation with Tran scaphoid fracture dislocation and trapezium fracture-A case report of rare fracture presentation.

Peri lunate and lunate dislocations are rare injuries associated with high energy impacts on a hyperextended and outstretched wrist. One-fourth (of peri lunate dislocations are missed at the initial presentation. We report a case of volar lunate dislocation along with proximal pole scaphoid and trapezium fracture in a patient who presented with high energy trauma. After the initial reduction of the dislocated lunate, he underwent open reduction internal fixation and soft tissue repair using through volar and dorsal approach. This was followed by K-wire removal and aggressive physiotherapy activities. At the end of three months he regained full movements with no recurrence of dislocation. Overall Peri lunate/lunate dislocation are one of the most important differential diagnosis in high energy injuries which requires immediate attention to prevent the potential risk of avascular necrosis of lunate, scaphoid leading to secondary osteoarthritis. As the injury transitions occurs from a dorsal peri lunate to a palmer lunate pattern, the most likely mechanism involved is a sheer fracture of the proximal pole of the scaphoid by the dorsal lip of the distal radius.

Kaplan's Lesion: A Case Report On The Complex Dislocation Of The Index Finger In A Weightlifter.

Background: Complex Dislocation of the metacarpophalangeal joint of the hand is a rare and unusual injury. These are also called as Kaplan's Lesion. They are divided into complex/irreducible and simple/reducible dislocation. Two approaches exist regarding their surgical intervention. We present a case of a 36-year-old weightlifter who presented to us with this uncommon entity and who was successfully treated with a dorsal approach. This case is presented to highlight the occurrence of this dislocation along with a brief discussion on its etiopathogenesis and management.

Plantar and dorsal approaches for excision of morton's neuroma: a comparison study.

BACKGROUND: Morton's neuroma is a painful enlargement of the plantar digital nerve between the metatarsal heads that causes pain of the forefoot. Several approaches have been used to treat Morton's neuroma, each of them having distinct advantages and disadvantages. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to investigate and compare the clinical outcomes of neurectomy in the treatment of Morton's neuroma through plantar and dorsal approaches. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 20 patients with a mean age of 48.5 ± 13.0 years (range: 19-66 years) who underwent excision of a Morton's neuroma that did not respond to conservative treatment were retrospectively analysed from June 2014 to June 2021. All the neurectomies were performed using a plantar or dorsal approach. Outcomes were evaluated using visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scores, the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM), and complications. The appearance index (AI) was also used to assess the influence of foot appearance on the quality of life after surgery. RESULTS: Eight patients underwent neurectomy by the dorsal approach, and 12 patients underwent neurectomy by the plantar approach. The average follow-up time was 28.9 ± 12.9 months (range: 15-72 months). No statistically significant difference was found between the dorsal and plantar approach groups with respect to postoperative pain measured by the VAS score. The postoperative AOFAS scores and FAAM outcomes were not significantly different between the groups. The complications reported in the dorsal approach group were significantly less than those of the plantar group, mainly discomfort in wearing shoes. The AI of the plantar group and the dorsal group were significantly different. CONCLUSION: The excision of the Morton's neuroma by both the dorsal and plantar approach resulted in satisfactory outcomes. However, the foot appearance after surgery by the plantar approach had less influence on the quality of life than that using the dorsal approach. Our recommendation is that surgeons should choose the approach they are most familiar with and with which they are most confident in performing. In addition, the plantar approach is recommended if the patient needs a better appearance.

Comparison of Anterior vs. Dorsal Approach for Spinal Accessory to Suprascapular Nerve Transfer in Patients With a Brachial Plexus Injury and Its Outcome on Shoulder Function.

Background Brachial plexus injuries are frequently encountered in the domain of plastic surgery, mostly secondary to road traffic accidents, gunshot injuries, or falls from a height. Many modalities have been described in the management, depending on the level and duration of the injury. C5, C6 and C5, C6, C7 are two common patterns in which nerve repair and transfers are described. At our center, we practice spinal accessory to suprascapular nerve transfer in all patients with upper trunk brachial plexus injury. There are two described approaches for the spinal accessory nerve to suprascapular nerve transfer, i.e. anterior or dorsal. The rationale for doing the posterior approach is that this approach avoids damaging the suprascapular nerve at its entrance in the suprascapular notch under the suprascapular ligament during exploration due to traction. Materials and methods This is a retrospective study with a consecutive sampling of 23 patients presenting at Liaquat National Hospital, Karachi, with upper trunk brachial plexus injuries during the time period from January 2016 to December 2017, i.e. two years. We divided these 23 patients into two groups, one with the anterior approach and the other with a dorsal approach for spinal accessory to suprascapular nerve transfer for shoulder abduction. The mean duration of post-surgical follow-up was from 18 to 24 months and recovery and functional outcomes were assessed. Results Out of the 23 patients that were included, 10 patients were operated on with an anterior approach and 13 with a posterior approach. Fifty percent (50%) of patients operated with the anterior approach and 84% of patients with the posterior showed the best motor grade recovery of M4, respectively, with better performance in patients with the posterior approach as compared to the anterior approach. Conclusion We advocate taking a posterior approach for spinal accessory to suprascapular nerve transfer for shoulder abduction, as it has shown better results with reliable outcomes concerning shoulder abduction, angle of abduction, and range of motion.

Minimally Invasive Dorsal Approach in the Surgery of Giant Thoracic Disk Herniation: Technical Note and Clinical Case Report.

BACKGROUND: Giant thoracic disk herniations are calcified hernias that fill >40% of the spinal canal and result in myelopathy with associated neurologic symptoms. This is a fairly rare abnormality that requires surgical treatment. Currently, there is no unambiguous opinion about the surgical approach to the treatment for this pathology. It is believed that the most effective method is the anterior approach (minithoracotomy or thoracoscopic approach), which reduces the risks of spinal cord injury but is associated with the risks of damage to the lungs, pleura, and major vessels. A giant thoracic disk herniation is also quite large. METHODS: We describe the case of a 60-year-old female patient with a giant thoracic disk herniation. Complete removal of the hernia through a minimally invasive dorsal approach was performed, followed by stabilization. In this case, we used 3-dimensional planning with the help of Surgical Theater, as well as intraoperative neuromonitoring. We also used the ZEISS QEVO, a microinspection tool to aid in resection. RESULTS: No complications have been registered after the surgery. In this case, surgery resulted in a curative treatment outcome for the patient. CONCLUSIONS: The minimally invasive dorsal approach in the surgery of giant thoracic herniated disks can be successfully used in neurosurgical practice. With this approach, it may be possible to avoid dorsal stabilization, but this requires additional research.

A versatile method for dorsal-approach plantar plate repair using standard operative instruments.

BACKGROUND: The plantar plate is an important static stabilizer of the lesser metatarsophalangeal joints, and disruptions of the plantar plate can lead to significant instability and lesser toe deformities. In recent years, direct plantar plate repair has been proposed. Although direct repair via a dorsal approach is attractive, a torn plantar plate is small and difficult to access using regular instruments in a restricted operative field. METHODS: In this report, a unique method for plantar plate repairs was used to repair various configurations of plantar plate tears with standard operative instruments that are available in most operating rooms. RESULTS: Using this method, 10 patients underwent plantar plate repairs, and the mean follow-up period was 24 (range, 14-38) months. The mean visual analog scale score for pain preoperatively was 4.1 (range, 0-6) and decreased to 0.6 (range, 0-3) at last follow-up. Postoperatively, the mean visual analog scale score for satisfaction was 9.6 (range, 8-10) and the mean American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society forefoot score was 88.8 (range, 75-100). CONCLUSIONS: Our study proposes an inexpensive and versatile method for plantar plate repair via a dorsal approach that uses standard operative instruments. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT04949685 . July 2, 2021 - Retrospectively registered, LEVEL OF CLINICAL EVIDENCE: 4.