Global sonication of the human intracranial space via a jumbo planar transducer.

Contrary to conditioning a Focused Ultrasound (FUS) beam to sonicate a localized region of the human brain, the goal of this investigation was to explore the prospect of distributing homogeneous ultrasound energy over the entire brain space with a large cranium-wide ultrasound beam. Recent ultrasound preclincal studies utilizing large or whole brain stimulation regions create a demand for expanding the treatment envelope of transcranial pulsed-low intensity ultrasound towards Global Brain Sonication (GBS) for potential human investigation. Here, we conduct ultrasound field characterizations when transmitting pulsed ultrasound through human skull specimens using a 1-3 piezocomposite planar transducer operating at 464 kHz with an active single-element surface of 30 × 30 cm. Through computational simulation and hydrophone scanning methodology, ultrasound wave behavior and dose homogeneity in the brain space were evaluated under various trajectories of sonication using the planar transducer. Clinically relevant pulse parameters used for transcranial therapeutic ultrasound applications were used in the experiments. Simulations and empirical testing revealed that dose homogeneity and acoustic intensity over the brain space are influenced by sonication trajectory, skull lens effects, and acoustic wave reflections. The transducer can emit a spatial peak pulse average intensity of 4.03 W/cm2 (0.24 MPa) measured in the free-field at 464 kHz with electrical power of 1 kW. The simulation showed that approximately 99 % of the cranial volume was exposed with <30 % of the maximum external acoustic intensity being transmitted into the skull. The transmission loss across all sonication trajectories is similar to previously reported FUS studies. A marker for GBS dose homogeneity is introduced to score the ultrasound pressure field uniformity in the intracranial space. Results of this study identify the initial challenges of exposing the entire human brain space with ultrasound using a large cranium-wide sonication beam intended for global brain therapeutic modulation.

Modeling of dose and linear energy transfer homogeneity in cell nuclei exposed to alpha particles under various setup conditions.

PURPOSE: Different alpha exposure setups are often used to study the relation between biological responses and LET. This study aimed to estimate the dose heterogeneity and uncertainty in four exposure setups using Geant4 and PARTRAC codes. The importance of the irradiation system characteristics was shown in the context of reporting experimental results, especially in radiobiological studies at the molecular level. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Geant4 was used to estimate the dose distributions in cells grown on a disk exposed to alpha particles penetrating from above and below. The latter setup was simulated without and with a collimator. PARTRAC was used for the validation of Geant4 simulations based on distributions of the number of alpha particles penetrating a round nucleus and the deposited energy. RESULTS: The LET distributions obtained for simulated setups excluding the collimator were wide and non-Gaussian. Using a collimator resulted in a Gaussian LET distribution, but strongly reduced dose rate and dose homogeneity. Comparison between PARTRAC and Geant4 calculations for the cell nucleus exposed to alpha radiation showed an excellent agreement. CONCLUSIONS: The interpretation of results from radiobiological experiments with alpha particles should always cover the characteristics of the experimental setup, which can be done precisely with computational methods.

The dose accumulation and the impact of deformable image registration on dose reporting parameters in a moving patient undergoing proton radiotherapy.

INTRODUCTION: Potential changes in patient anatomy during proton radiotherapy may lead to a deviation of the delivered dose. A dose estimate can be computed through a deformable image registration (DIR) driven dose accumulation. The present study evaluates the accumulated dose uncertainties in a patient subject to an inadvertent breathing associated motion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A virtual lung tumour was inserted into a pair of single participant landmark annotated computed tomography images depicting opposite breathing phases, with the deep inspiration breath-hold the planning reference and the exhale the off-reference geometry. A novel Monte Carlo N-Particle, Version 6 (MCNP6) dose engine was developed, validated and used in treatment plan optimization. Three DIR methods were compared and used to transfer the exhale simulated dose to the reference geometry. Dose conformity and homogeneity measures from International Committee on Radioactivity Units and Measurements (ICRU) reports 78 and 83 were evaluated on simulated dose distributions registered with different DIR algorithms. RESULTS: The MCNP6 dose engine handled patient-like geometries in reasonable dose calculation times. All registration methods were able to align image associated landmarks to distances, comparable to voxel sizes. A moderate deterioration of ICRU measures was encountered in comparing doses in on and off-reference anatomy. There were statistically significant DIR driven differences in ICRU measures, particularly a 10% difference in the relative D98% for planning tumour volume and in the 3 mm/3% gamma passing rate. CONCLUSIONS: T he dose accumulation over two anatomies resulted in a DIR driven uncertainty, important in reporting the associated ICRU measures for quality assurance.

A customizable aluminum compensator system for total body irradiation.

PURPOSE: To develop a simplified aluminum compensator system for total body irradiation (TBI) that is easy to assemble and modify in a short period of time for customized patient treatments. METHODS: The compensator is composed of a combination of 0.3 cm thick aluminum bars, two aluminum T-tracks, spacers, and metal bolts. The system is mounted onto a plexiglass block tray. The design consists of 11 fixed sectors spanning from the patient's head to feet. The outermost sectors utilize 7.6 cm wide aluminum bars, while the remaining sectors use 2.5 cm wide aluminum bars. There is a magnification factor of 5 from the compensator to the patient treatment plane. Each bar of aluminum is interconnected at each adjacent sector with a tongue and groove arrangement and fastened to the T-track using a metal washer, bolt, and nut. Inter-bar leakage of the compensator was tested using a water tank and diode. End-to-end measurements were performed with an ion chamber in a solid water phantom and also with a RANDO phantom using internal and external optically stimulated luminescent detectors (OSLDs). In-vivo patient measurements from the first 20 patients treated with this aluminum compensator were compared to those from 20 patients treated with our previously used lead compensator system. RESULTS: The compensator assembly time was reduced to 20-30 min compared to the 2-4 h it would take with the previous lead design. All end-to-end measurements were within 10% of that expected. The median absolute in-vivo error for the aluminum compensator was 3.7%, with 93.8% of measurements being within 10% of that expected. The median error for the lead compensator system was 5.3%, with 85.1% being within 10% of that expected. CONCLUSION: This design has become the standard compensator at our clinic. It allows for quick assembly and customization along with meeting the Task Group 29 recommendations for dose uniformity.

Verification of the junctional dose for irradiation of the chest wall and supraclavicular regions under the circumstances of advanced technologies.

A single-isocenter half-beam technique is commonly used when irradiating the chest wall and supraclavicular regions in patients with high-risk breast cancer. However, several studies have reported that underdosage can occur at the junction of the chest wall and supraclavicular regions due to a "tongue-and-groove" effect. This study verified the efficacy of an open leaf technique (OL-tech) that involves placing a multileaf collimator 5 mm outside from the beam central axis to remove the effect of the multileaf collimator in a single-isocenter half-beam technique. We compared the junction doses of the OL-tech with those of a conventional technique (C-tech) in square and clinical plans, using 4 and 10 MV x-rays in the Clinac iX and 6 and 10 MV x-rays in the Trilogy accelerators (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA). EBT3 radiochromic films were used for measurements. Measurements were performed at a depth of 3 cm when verifying field matching. The EBT3 films in the square plan indicated junction doses for the C-tech of 78.3% with the Clinac iX accelerator and 73.6% with the Trilogy accelerator. By contrast, the corresponding doses for the OL-tech were 107.2% and 99.8%, respectively. In the clinical plan, the junction doses for the C-tech were 76.5% with the Clinac iX accelerator and 72.6% with the Trilogy accelerator; the corresponding doses for the OL-tech were 108.3% and 101.7%, respectively. As with the square plan, variations in the junction dose were much smaller using the OL-tech than using the C-tech. Our results suggest that the OL-tech can be useful for improving dose homogeneity at the junction of the chest wall and supraclavicular regions.

Comparison of different TBI techniques in terms of dose homogeneity - review study.

Total body irradiation (TBI) is a kind of external beam radiotherapy, used in conjunction with chemotherapy with the purpose of immunosuppression. Since the target in TBI is the whole body, so achieving uniform dose distribution throughout the entire body during TBI is necessary. As recommended by AAPM dose variation must be within ±10% of the prescription dose. With the evidences from literature there is limited substantiation to consider a treatment method better than others, but with regard to the size of the treatment room, workload of the radiotherapy department and prevalent technology used within each treatment department it is recommended to make the suitable and optimum method in each department. In this work, a review study was performed on different TBI techniques with the purpose of assessment and comparison of dose distribution homogeneity in these methods.

Evaluating the positional uncertainty of intrafraction, adjacent fields, and daily setup with the BrainLAB ExacTrac system in patients who are receiving craniospinal irradiation.

PURPOSE: To investigate the daily setup, interfraction motion, variability in the junction areas, and dosimetric effect in craniospinal irradiation (CSI) patients. METHODS: Fifteen CSI patients who had undergone split-field IMRT were followed in the study. Previous, middle, and posttreatment, each target volume position was evaluated using the ExacTrac system. Interfraction and intrafraction motions, the margin of the junction in adjacent targets volumes, and the dosimetric effect of the longitudinal residual error were analyzed. RESULTS: The lowest attainment rate within the tolerance of the initial setup error was 66.79% in six directions. The values of the initial error were within 15 mm (SD 4.5 mm) in the translation direction and 5° (SD 1.3°) in the rotation direction after the transposition of the treatment isocenter. With the guidance of the ExacTrac system, the interfraction and intrafraction residual errors were almost within the tolerance after correction, the margin of CTV-to-PCTV was in the range of target expansion criteria. The residual longitudinal errors resulted in only slight changes in the mean doses of PGTV and PCTV, while the maximum dose of the spinal cord increased by 16.1%. The patients did not exhibit any side-effects by the overall treatment during the follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: Position correction is necessary after setup and the transposition of the treatment isocenter. Intra-fraction motion in the lateral direction should be monitored throughout treatment. The position errors in junction areas are almost within the tolerance after correction. The patients did not exhibit any side-effects by the overall treatment.

Semi-supervised planning method for breast electronic tissue compensation treatments based on breast radius and separation.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to develop and assess a technique for the optimization of breast electronic tissue compensation (ECOMP) treatment plans based on the breast radius and separation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten ECOMP plans for 10 breast cancer patients delivered at our institute were collected for this work. Pre-treatment CT-simulation images were anonymized and input to a framework for estimation of the breast radius and separation for each axial slice. Optimal treatment fluence was estimated based on the breast radius and separation, and a total beam fluence map for both medial and lateral fields was generated. These maps were then imported into the Eclipse Treatment Planning System and used to calculate a dose distribution. The distribution was compared to the original treatment hand-optimized by a medical dosimetrist. An additional comparison was performed by generating plans assuming a single tissue penetration depth determined by averaging the breast radius and separation over the entire treatment volume. Comparisons between treatment plans used the dose homogeneity index (HI; lower number is better). RESULTS: HI was non-inferior between our algorithm (HI = 12.6) and the dosimetrist plans (HI = 9.9) (p-value > 0.05), and was superior than plans obtained using a single penetration depth (HI = 17.0) (p-value < 0.05) averaged over the 10 collected plans. Our semi-supervised algorithm takes approximately 20 seconds for treatment plan generation and runs with minimal user input, which compares favorably with the dosimetrist plans that can take up to 30 minutes of attention for full optimization. CONCLUSIONS: This work indicates the potential clinical utility of a technique for the optimization of ECOMP breast treatments.

Utilizing clinical pathways and web-based conferences to improve quality of care in a large integrated network using breast cancer radiation therapy as the model.

BACKGROUND: Clinical pathways outline criteria for dose homogeneity and critical organ dosimetry. Based upon an internal audit showing suboptimal compliance with dosimetric parameters in whole breast irradiation (WBI), we conducted a mandatory web-based teaching conference for the network. This study reports the impact of this initiative on subsequent treatment plans. METHODS: Radiation treatment plans were collected for the 10 most recent patients receiving WBI at 16 institutions within the UPMC Hillman Cancer Center network. Subsequently, a web-based conference was conducted to educate staff physicians, physicists, and dosimetrists with goals for dose homogeneity and critical organ dosimetry. Six months post-conference, another 10 plans were collected from each site and compared to pre-conference plans for deviations from dosimetric criteria. RESULTS: Dose homogeneity significantly improved after the conference with breast V105% decreasing from 15.6% to 11.2% (p = 0.004) and breast V110% decreasing from 1.3% to 0.04% (p = 0.008). A higher percentage of cases were compliant with dosimetric criteria, with breast V105% > 20% decreasing from 22.5% to 7.5% of cases (p = 0.0002) and breast V110% > 0% decreasing from 13.8% to 4.4% of cases (p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a web-based teaching conference helped improve adherence to clinical pathway dosimetric guidelines for WBI. In radiation oncology networks, this may be an effective model to ensure quality in routine practice and can be extrapolated to other disease sites.

Reducing dose to the lungs through loosing target dose homogeneity requirement for radiotherapy of non small cell lung cancer.

It is important to minimize lung dose during intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) of nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In this study, an approach was proposed to reduce lung dose by relaxing the constraint of target dose homogeneity during treatment planning of IMRT. Ten NSCLC patients with lung tumor on the right side were selected. The total dose for planning target volume (PTV) was 60 Gy (2 Gy/fraction). For each patient, two IMRT plans with six beams were created in Pinnacle treatment planning system. The dose homogeneity of target was controlled by constraints on the maximum and uniform doses of target volume. One IMRT plan was made with homogeneous target dose (the resulting target dose was within 95%-107% of the prescribed dose), while another IMRT plan was made with inhomogeneous target dose (the resulting target dose was more than 95% of the prescribed dose). During plan optimization, the dose of cord and heart in two types of IMRT plans were kept nearly the same. The doses of lungs, PTV and organs at risk (OARs) between two types of IMRT plans were compared and analyzed quantitatively. For all patients, the lung dose was decreased in the IMRT plans with inhomogeneous target dose. On average, the mean dose, V5, V20, and V30 of lung were reduced by 1.4 Gy, 4.8%, 3.7%, and 1.7%, respectively, and the dose to normal tissue was also reduced. These reductions in DVH values were all statistically significant (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences between the two IMRT plans on V25, V30, V40, V50 and mean dose for heart. The maximum doses of cords in two type IMRT plans were nearly the same. IMRT plans with inhomogeneous target dose could protect lungs better and may be considered as a choice for treating NSCLC.

MLC-based penumbra softener of EDW borders to reduce junction inhomogeneities.

Junctions of fields are known to be susceptible to developing cold or hot spots in the presence of even small geometrical misalignments. Reduction of these dose inhomogeneities can be accomplished through decreasing the dose gradients in the penumbra, but currently it cannot be done for enhanced dynamic wedges (EDW). An MLC-based penumbra softener was developed in the developer mode of TrueBeam linacs to reduce dose gradients across the side border of EDWs. The movement of each leaf was individually synchronized with the movement of the dynamic Y jaw to soften the penumbra in the same manner along the entire field border, in spite of the presence of the dose gradient of the EDW. Junction homogeneity upon field misalignment for side-matched EDWs was examined with the MV imager. The fluence inhomogeneities were reduced from about 30% per mm of shift of the field borders for the conventional EDW to about 2% per mm for the softened-penumbra plan. The junction in a four-field monoisocentric breast plan delivered to the Rando phantom was assessed with film. The dose inhomogeneities across the junction in the superior-inferior direction were reduced from about 20% to 25% per mm for the conventional fields to about 5% per mm. The dose near the softened junction of the breast plan with no shifts did not deviate from the conventional plan by more than about 4%. The newly-developed softened-penumbra junction of EDW (and/or open) fields was shown to reduce sensitivity to misalignments without increasing complexity of the planning or delivery. This methodology needs to be adopted by the manufacturers for clinical use.

Prospective study of postoperative whole breast radiotherapy for Japanese large-breasted women: a clinical and dosimetric comparisons between supine and prone positions and a dose measurement using a breast phantom.

BACKGROUND: This prospective study aimed to compare dose volume histograms (DVH) of the breasts and organs at risk (OARs) of whole breast radiotherapy in the supine and prone positions, and frequency and severity of acute and late toxicities were analyzed. METHODS: Early-stage breast cancer patients with large breasts (Japanese bra size C or larger, or the widest measurements of the bust ≥ 95 cm) undergoing partial mastectomy participated in this study. CT-based treatment plans were made in each position, and various dosimetric parameters for the breast and OARs were calculated to compare the supine and prone radiotherapy plans. The actual treatment was delivered in the position regarded as better. RESULTS: From 2009 to 2010, 22 patients were prospectively accrued. Median follow-up period was 58 months. The homogeneity index and lung doses were significantly lower in the prone position (P = 0.008, P < 0.0001 and P < 0.0001, respectively). Cardiac dose showed no significant differences between two positions. By comparing two plans, the prone position was chosen in 77 % of the patients. In the prone position, ≥ grade 2 acute dermatitis were seen in 47 % of patients treated, whereas 20 % of the patients treated in the supine position had grade 2 and no cases of grade 3, although without a statistical significance of the rates of ≥ grade 2 acute dermatitis between the two positions (P = 0.28). The actual dose measurement using a breast phantom revealed significantly higher surface dose of the breast treated in the prone position than that in the supine position. CONCLUSIONS: Breast irradiation in the prone position improves PTV homogeneity and lowers doses to the OARs in the Japanese large-breast patients. However meticulous positioning of the breast in the prone board avoiding the bolus effect is necessary to prevent acute dermatitis.

A retrospective dosimetric comparison of TG43 and a commercially available MBDCA for an APBI brachytherapy patient cohort.

PURPOSE: To compare dosimetry using a contemporary model based dose calculation algorithm (MBDCA) following TG186 recommendations, and the conventional TG43 method in an (192)Ir high dose rate (HDR) accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) patient cohort. METHODS: Data of 38 APBI patients were studied. Dosimetry for the treatment plans was performed using both the TG43 and TG186 dose calculation methods of the Oncentra Brachy v4.4 treatment planning system (TPS). Analysis included indices of clinical interest for the planning target volume (PTV coverage, dose homogeneity, conformity) as well as dose volume histograms (DVH) for the breast, lung, heart, rib and skin. Significance testing of observed differences between TG43 and TG186 results was carried out and the effect of target location to these differences was studied. RESULTS: Statistically significant differences were observed in the values of clinically relevant DVH parameters for the PTV and the organs at risk (OAR), except for the heart. Differences for the PTV are relatively small (<1% for coverage, on the order of 2% for homogeneity and conformity) with a slight TG43 overestimation except for the dose homogeneity. Percentage differences are larger for the rib and lung (on the order of 4% for Dmax and 5% for V10Gy, respectively) and maximum for the skin (on the order of 6% for D10cc), with a correlation of the observed differences with target location. CONCLUSION: While the MBDCA option of the TPS appears to improve dosimetric accuracy, differences from TG43 do not appear to warrant dose prescription changes or treatment protocol amendment..

Comparison of pencil beam-based homogeneous vs inhomogeneous target dose planning for stereotactic body radiotherapy of peripheral lung tumors through Monte Carlo-based recalculation.

This study was conducted to ascertain whether homogeneous target dose planning is suitable for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) of peripheral lung cancer under appropriate breath-holding. For 20 peripheral lung tumors, paired dynamic conformal arc plans were generated by only adjusting the leaf margin to the planning target volume (PTV) edge for fulfilling the conditions such that the prescription isodose surface (IDS) encompassing exactly 95% of the PTV (PTV D95) corresponds to 95% and 80% IDS, normalized to 100% at the PTV isocenter under a pencil beam (PB) algorithm with radiologic path length correction. These plans were recalculated using the x-ray voxel Monte Carlo (XVMC) algorithm under otherwise identical conditions, and then compared. Lesions abutting the parietal pleura or not were defined as edge or island tumors, respectively, and the influences of the target volume and its location relative to the chest wall on the target dose were examined. The median (range) leaf margin required for the 95% and 80% plans was 3.9 mm (1.3 to 5.0) and -1.2 mm (-1.8 to 0.1), respectively. Notably, the latter was significantly correlated negatively with PTV. In the 80% plans, the PTV D95 was slightly higher under XVMC, whereas the PTV D98 was significantly lower, irrespective of the dose calculation algorithm used. Other PTV and all gross tumor volume doses were significantly higher, while the lung doses outside the PTV were slightly lower. The target doses increased as a function of PTV and were significantly lower for island tumors than for edge tumors. In conclusion, inhomogeneous target dose planning using smaller leaf margin for a larger tumor volume was deemed suitable in ensuring more sufficient target dose while slightly reducing lung dose. In addition, more inhomogeneous target dose planning using <80% IDS (e.g., 70%) for PTV covering would be preferable for island tumors.

Different treatment planning protocols can lead to large differences in organ at risk sparing.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Different planning protocols may define varying planning target volume (PTV) dose criteria. We investigated the hypothesis that this could result in differences in organ-at-risk (OAR) sparing. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Volumetric modulated arc therapy plans were created for ten locally advanced head and neck cancer patients following PTV criteria specified by the RTOG, EORTC and institutional (VUmc) protocols. Resulting plans were evaluated on the basis of the homogeneity index, calculated for the boost/elective PTVs as HIB/HIE=100%*(D2%-D98%)/D50% and mean dose to individual and composite salivary (compsal) and swallowing (compswal) OARs. RESULTS: RTOG plans were the most homogeneous, with mean HIB of 8.2±0.9%, compared to 9.5±1.0%/11.6±1.5% for the VUmc/EORTC plans. EORTC plans provided most OAR sparing, with compsal/compswal doses of 24.6±7.7/22.9±4.2Gy, compared to 32.2±9.7/29.9±4.2Gy and 28.4±8.1/24.7±5.3Gy for RTOG and VUmc, respectively. EORTC provided 7.2/7.7Gy mean dose reductions to the contra/ipsilateral parotid glands compared to RTOG. CONCLUSIONS: Different planning protocols resulted in different levels of PTV dose homogeneity. We observed differences of up to ⩾7Gy in composite and individual mean OAR doses. This could influence rates of toxicity and should be taken into account when comparing clinical studies. A consensus should be reached between major trial groups on appropriate PTV parameters.

Dosimetric Comparison of 6MV and 10MV Photons for Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy treatment (IMRT) of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer / 昆明医科大学学报

Objective To compare the effects of 6MV and 10MV-X-ray intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) on non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) . Methods We randomly selected 20 patients with NSCLC, 6MV and 10MV X-ray were used respectively for each NSCLC patient with IMRT plan design, the ADAC Pinnacle 8.0f treatment planning system was applied to provide the convolution/iteration algorithm, for the same target IMRT plan design with two kinds of energy. By comparing the dose volume histogram (DVH),PTV parameter (Dmean, Dmin and Dmax), conformal index (CI) and homogeneity index (HI),we analyzed the metrology parameters . Results 6MV and 10MV radiation therapy plan DVH, PTV parameters,CI,HI and isodose line was similar,no statistically significant differences. But target dose homogeneity and the degree of target coverage in high dose of 6MV plan was better than that in 10MV plan. Endanger organs (OAR) such as normal lung tissue, heart, esophagus and spinal cord had basically same dose amount. Conclusion 6MV X-ray plan may be the better choice of radiotherapy on NSCLC.

Accelerated partial breast irradiation using external beam radiotherapy-A feasibility study based on dosimetric analysis.

AIM: To investigate the feasibility of using External Beam radiotherapy for accelerated partial breast irradiation by a comparative tumour and normal tissue dose volume analysis with that of high dose rate interstitial brachytherapy. BACKGROUND: Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation (APBI) is more clinically appealing because of the reduced treatment course duration and the irradiated area. Brachytherapy application is more dependent on the clinician's expertise when it is practised free hand without image guidance and a template. It happens to be an invasive procedure with the use of local anaesthesia which adds patient discomfort apart from its cost compared to External Beam Radiotherapy. But APBI with brachytherapy is more commonly practised procedure compared to EBRT owing to its previous reults. Hence in this research study, we intend to explore the use of EBRT with the radiobiological corrections for APBI in the place of brachytherapy. It is done as a dosimetric comparison of Brachytherapy treatment plans with that of EBRT plans. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The computed tomography images of 15 patients undergoing ISBT planning were simulated with conformal photon fields. Various dose volume parameters of each structure were obtained from the DVH generated in the brachytherapy and the simulated external beam planning which can correlate well with the late toxicity. The plan quality indices such as conformity index and homogeneity index for the target volume were computed from the dosimetric factors. The statistical p values for CI, HI and normal tissue dosimetric parameters were calculated and the confidence levels achievable were analysed. The dose prescribed in brachytherapy was 3400cGy in ten fractions. The equivalent prescription dose for the external beam radiotherapy planning was 3000cGy in five fractions applied with radiobiological correction. RESULTS: All the fifteen patients were with complete lung data and six were with left sided tumours having complete cardiac data. The lung dosimetry data and the cardiac dosimetry data of the patients were studied. Lower percentages of lung and cardiac V 20 and V 5 volumes were obtained with conformal planning. The conformity of radiation dose to the tumour volume was akin to the interstitial brachytherapy planning. Moreover the external beam planning resulted in more homogenous dose distribution. For the sampled population, the statistical analysis showed a confidence level of 95% for using EBRT as an alternate to multi catheter ISBT. CONCLUSION: The EBRT planning for Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation was found to be technically feasible in the institution where the interstitial brachytherapy happens to be the only available technique as evident from the dose volume parameters and the statistical analysis.

Dose distribution homogeneity in two TBI techniques-Analysis of 208 irradiated patients conducted in Stanislaw Leszczynski Memorial Hospital, Katowice.

BACKGROUND: To analyze and compare dose distribution homogeneity in selected points (especially in the chest wall region) for patients irradiated with two different TBI techniques to achieve a uniform total dose (excluding lungs area) specified in the range of 11.4-14.0 Gy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From August 2000 to December 2009, a group of 158 patients was treated by the use of 15 MV photon irradiation consisting of six fractions: four opposed lateral and two anterior-posterior/posterior-anterior (AP/PA). Patients were irradiated with the fraction dose of 2 Gy twice a day for 3 consecutive days. The prescribed dose to PC point (specified at intersection of the beam axis with the mid-plane of the patient irradiated laterally) was 12 Gy. Since January 2010 until closing the study, another group of 50 patients was treated according to a modified protocol. The treatment was carried out in six lateral fractions only, twice a day, for three following days and a lateral lung shield was used for a part of total irradiation time. The measurements of doses in 20 selected points of patient's body were carried out by means of MOSFET detectors. RESULTS: The modified TBI technique allows to achieve an expected homogenous dose in the points of interest similar to that obtained by using the initial protocol. The calculated and measured in vivo doses met the specified range of 11.4-14 Gy for both applied TBI protocols. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that for all patients the homogenous dose distribution in the specified range was achieved.

Improved Breast Irradiation Techniques Using Multistatic Fields or Three Dimensional Universal Compensators / 대한방사선종양학회지

PURPOSE: In order to improve dose homogeneity and to reduce acute toxicity in tangential whole breast radiotherapy, we evaluated two treatment techniques using multiple static fields or universal compensators. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 1) Multistatic field technique : Using a three dimensional radiation treatment planning system, Adac Pinnacle 4.0, we accomplished a conventional wedged tangential plan. Examining the isodose distributions, a third field which blocked overdose regions was designed and an opposing field was created by using an automatic function of RTPS. Weighting of the beams was tuned until an ideal dose distribution was obtained. Another pair of beams were added when the dose homogeneity was not satisfactory. 2) Universal compensator technique : The breast shapes and sizes were obtained from the CT images of 20 patients who received whole breast radiation therapy at our institution. The data obtained were averaged and a pair of universal physical compensators were designed for the averaged data. DII (Dose Inhomogeneity Index : percentage volume of PTV outside 95-105% of the prescribed dose), Dmax (the maximum point dose in the PTV) and isodose distributions for each technique were compared. RESULTS: The multistatic field technique was found to be superior to the conventional technique, reducing the mean value of DII by 14.6% ( p value<0.000) and the Dmax by 4.7% ( p value<0.000). The universal compensator was not significantly superior to the conventional technique since it decreased Dmax by 0.3% ( p value=0.867) and reduced DII by 3.7% ( p value=0.260). However, it decreased the value of DII by maximum 18% when patients' breast shapes fitted in with the compensator geometry. CONCLUSION: The multistatic field technique is effective for improving dose homogeneity for whole breast radiation therapy and is applicable to all patients, whereas the use of universal compensators is effective only in patients whose breast shapes fit inwith the universal compensator geometry, and thus has limited applicability.