Endoscopic dilation using two guidewires: a novel approach for establishing access tract during percutaneous nephrolithotomy under ultrasonographic guidance.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a novel endoscopic dilation (END) method during percutaneous nephrolithotomy under ultrasonographic guidance. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of 138 patients who underwent percutaneous nephrolithotomy from June 2020 to December 2021. The patients were divided into three groups based on the method of nephrostomy tract creation: those who underwent fascial Amplatz serial fascial dilation (AMD) (n = 45), one-shot dilation (OSD) (n = 45), and END (n = 48). For END, a 20-Fr dilator with sheath was accessed over the first guidewire. A second guidewire was inserted into the collecting system via the endoscope. The nephroscope was then accessed to enlarge the renal puncture point using both guidewires. Demographic variables and important intraoperative and postoperative findings were compared among the three groups. RESULTS: The preoperative characteristics were similar among the three groups. The END group had a significantly shorter access time than both the AMD and OSD groups and significantly less severe hemoglobin loss than the OSD group. There were no significant differences in the other important perioperative findings. CONCLUSION: Use of this novel END method with two guidewires may be associated with less blood loss and a reduced access time.

Double guide-wire technique versus transpancreatic biliary sphincterotomy for difficult biliary cannulation: Real life experience from a referral center.

BACKGROUND: During ERCP for biliary indication, when a difficult bile duct (BD) cannulation occurs, with unintended access to the main pancreatic duct (PD), both double guidewire technique (DGW) and transpancreatic biliary sphincterotomy (TPBS) can be performed. We aimed to compare the technical success and adverse events (AEs) rate of these techniques. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients with naïve papillae referred to the Pancreas Institute of Verona from January 2016 and July 2021 to undergo ERCP for biliary indications was performed. RESULTS: Overall, 202 patients (53.5% males, mean age 67.2 years) were evaluated (96 DGW, 106 TPBS). Malignant biliary stricture was the most common ERCP indication (78.2%). The rate of success in deep biliary cannulation was significantly higher in the DGW group (94.8%) compared to TPBS (79.2%) at the first attempt (p = 0.001). This result was also confirmed in the subgroup of patients with malignant distal stricture (72/77, 93.5% vs 63/80, 78.8%, p = 0.01). No significant difference in AEs rate, particularly in PEP incidence was found between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: DGW demonstrated a higher success rate and similar safety profile compared with TPBS in difficult biliary cannulation. Based on this retrospective study, DGW should be preferred over TPBS in case of unintended PD cannulation. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm our results.

Double guidewire technique (DGT): Optimising endovascular revision of juxta-anastomotic stenosis in AV-fistulae: A retrospective analysis.

BACKGROUND: Arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is the preferred angioaccess for haemodialysis but suffers from a high stenosis rate, juxta-anastomotic stenosis (JAS) being the most frequent. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) of JAS would have some advantage (such as mini-invasive and vein sparing treatment), but higher recurrence rate is observed as compared to surgery. We report results of juxta anastomotic stenosis PTA using the 'double guide technique' (DGT) as described by Turmel-Rodrigues, in a selected cohort from our Vascular Access Centre. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January to June 2018, 25 consecutive patients were treated by DGT. By means of retrograde access through the outflow vein by a 6 F introducer, two guide wires were navigated: one into proximal radial artery (GW1), the other into distal artery (GW2). GW2 was used to dilate juxta-anastomotic vein and anastomotic area with 6 mm high-pressure balloon, while by GW1 juxta-anastomotic artery was dilated with 4 mm semi-compliant balloon. Mean diameter of balloons were 6.7 and 4.1 mm for venous and arterial tract dilatation. Follow up was carried out up to 12 months. Prospectively collected data were analysed retrospectively. RESULTS: One-year primary and secondary patency was 52% and 95% respectively. Recurrence rate was 0.56 procedure/pt/year. Mean access blood flow at 12 months was 830 ml/min. CONCLUSION: Double Guidewire Technique is an effective and minimally invasive procedure. By avoiding under dilation of JAS the recurrence rate resulted quite satisfactorily in our population.

Double-guidewire technique for endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder stenting.

Highlight Endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder stenting is effective for acute cholecystitis with high surgical risk. However, looping of the guidewire in the cystic duct sometimes impedes placement of the stent. Nakahara and colleagues present a case of successful endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder stenting after straightening the looped guidewire using a double-guidewire technique.

A Prospective Multicenter Randomized Feasibility Trial of Double-guidewire Techniques for Difficult Biliary Cannulation Comparing a New Double-guidewire-supported Sphincterotome (MagicTome) to a Conventional Device.

Objective To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the double-guidewire technique (DGT) using a new double-guidewire-supported sphincterotome (MagicTome) for patients who required endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for biliary cannulation. Methods This prospective multicenter randomized feasibility trial involved patients with difficult biliary cannulation at any of the three study sites from June 2017 to October 2018. Patients were assigned to the DGT with MagicTome (MDGT) initially performed group and the conventional DGT (CDGT) initially performed group. The success rates of biliary cannulation by MDGT and CDGT and the ERCP-related complications were evaluated. Results Twenty-eight patients were included in this study. No significant difference was observed in the success rates of first attempts and crossover attempts between the groups (p=0.69 and p=1.00). Furthermore, no significant difference was observed in the success rate of biliary cannulation between MDGT and CDGT (62.5% and 75.0%, respectively; p=0.48). CDGT was successful in two of four patients with malignant biliary obstruction. MDGT was successful in all four patients with malignant biliary obstruction, including the two for whom CDGT was unsuccessful. Post-ERCP pancreatitis occurred in only one MDGT case. Conclusion MDGT is safe for biliary cannulation and can be used in cases where biliary cannulation by CDGT is difficult.

Biliary Cannulation in Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiography: How to Tackle the Difficult Papilla.

BACKGROUND: In the setting of a naïve papilla, biliary cannulation is a key step in successfully performing endoscopic retrograde cholangiography. Difficult biliary cannulation (DBC) is associated with an increased risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis and failure of the whole procedure. SUMMARY: Recommendations for biliary cannulation can be divided into (a) measures to reduce the likelihood of a difficult papilla situation a priori and (b) rescue techniques in case the endoscopist is actually facing DBC. (a) Careful inspection of the papillary anatomy and optimizing its accessibility by scope positioning is fundamental. A sphincterotome in combination with a soft-tip hydrophilic guidewire rather than a standard catheter with a standard guidewire should be used in most situations. (b) The most important rescue techniques are needle-knife precut, double-guidewire technique, and transpancreatic sphincterotomy. In few cases, anterograde cannulation techniques are needed. To this regard, the EUS-guided biliary drainage followed by rendezvous is increasingly used as an alternative to percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage. Key Messages: Biliary cannulation can be accomplished with alternative retrograde or less frequently by salvage anterograde techniques, once conventional direct cannulation attempts have failed. Considering recent favorable data for the early use of transpancreatic sphincterotomy, an adopted version of the 2016 European Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) algorithm on biliary cannulation is proposed.

Combination prevention of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis in patients undergoing double-guidewire assisted biliary cannulation: A case-control study with propensity score matching.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Rectal indomethacin and pancreatic duct stenting (PDS) are recommended for the prevention of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis (PEP). However, the effects of the combination of the two methods on preventing PEP are controversial. We hypothesized that some group of difficult patients might benefit from the combination of indomethacin plus PDS (IP) compared with indomethacin alone (IN). METHODS: Patients with native papilla who underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in eight tertiary hospitals were screened. They were enrolled if the cannulation proved difficult and post-procedure indomethacin was administered. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance the baseline characteristics between IP and IN groups. The primary outcome was PEP. RESULTS: Among 4456 patients with available cannulation-related data, 1889 (42.4%) patients had difficult cannulation and received indomethacin. After PSM, both IP and IN groups included 332 patients. PEP was comparable between the two groups (12.7% vs 10.2%, P = 0.329). By subgroup analysis, the PEP rate was found to be lower in the IP group than in the IN group (7.3% vs 18.2%, P = 0.026) in patients undergoing double-guidewire technique (DGT). The results of an additional analysis using PSM in DGT patients were consistent with the subgroup analysis results (7.8% vs 19.4%, P = 0.036). CONCLUSIONS: The current study indicated that the combined prevention of PEP with indomethacin plus PDS was useful in PEP prevention in patients undergoing DGT. Other groups of patients with difficult cannulation may not benefit from the combination strategy.

A preliminary study of double guidewire technique combined with pancreatic duct stenting in preventing post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis / 中华消化内镜杂志

To study the preventive effects of double guidewire technique combined with pancreatic duct stenting in preventing post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis (PEP). Patients receiving ERCP were divided into the treatment group and the control group by random number table. In the treatment group, double guidewire technique combined with pancreatic duct stenting was applied. In the control group, selective biliary intubation was applied in the conventional way. The intubation time, PEP, hyperamylasemia and bleeding incidence were analyzed between the two groups. A total of 80 patients were enrolled in this study from January 2016 to December 2018. There were 40 cases in the treatment group and 39 cases in the control group. In the treatment group, the mean intubation time was 384±102 seconds. No PEP or bleeding during and after the operation occurred, but hyperamylasemia occurred in 2 cases. In the control group, the mean intubation time was 427±115 seconds. Hyperamylasemia occurred in 6 cases, PEP occurred in 3 cases, and 1 case of intraoperative bleeding happened in the control group. The incidence of PEP [0 VS 7.7%(3/39)]and hyperamylasemia [5.0% (2/40)VS 15.4%(6/39)] were lower in the treatment group (both P<0.05). Double guidewire technique combined with pancreatic duct stenting can successfully perform selective bile duct intubation and effectively prevent PEP.

Learning curve of double-guidewire technique by trainees during hands-on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography training.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Double-guidewire technique (DWT) has been successfully performed by experts in difficult biliary cannulation as an advanced technique. This study aimed to define the learning curve and safety of DWT by trainees during hands-on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) training. METHODS: Patients were eligible for inclusion in the study if the biliary cannulation was difficult and the pancreatic duct was inadvertently cannulated. DWT was performed by two trainees randomly under trainers' guidance. The primary outcome was the success rate of DWT biliary cannulation of trainees. Cumulative sum analysis was used to generate visual learning curves. RESULTS: A total of 60 patients with difficult cannulation were enrolled. The main indications for ERCP were common bile duct stones (65%) and biliary stricture (31.7%). The learning curve analysis showed that to achieve a 70% rate of successful DWT, 12 procedures were needed for trainee A and 15 for trainee B. Higher targeted success rate of DWT could be achieved if the number of DWT procedures increased. Compared with the early stage of learning DWT (case 1 to 15 for each trainee), trainees had significantly higher DWT success rate in the late stage (36.7% [11/30] vs 80% [24/30], P = 0.001). The final success rate of cannulation was 98.3% (59/60). The overall rate of post-ERCP pancreatitis and adverse events was 6.7% (4/60) and 8.3% (5/60), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Double-guidewire technique was safely performed by two novel trainees during hands-on ERCP training. Fifteen procedures may be enough for trainees to achieve the competency of performing DWT. (Clinicaltrials.gov number: NCT03707613).

Comparison between double guidewire technique and transpancreatic sphincterotomy technique for difficult biliary cannulation / 中华消化内镜杂志

Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of double guidewire technique ( DGT ) with transpancreatic sphincterotomy ( TPS) in cannulation of difficult biliary. Methods The data of patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography from January 2014 to January 2016 in our hospital were retrospectively studied. DGT or TPS was performed on patients with difficult biliary cannulation and frequent unintended pancreatic cannulation. The cannulation success rate, cannulation time and complications of DGT and TPS were compared. Results Data of 237 patients with difficult biliary cannulation were collected, including 135 using DGT and 102 using TPS. The cannulation success rate was 79. 3％ (107/135) in DGT and 90. 2％ (92/102) in TPS (P=0. 023). The cannulation time was 8. 8±2. 7 min in DGT and 4. 7±1. 3 min in TPS (P=0. 017). The overall incidence of complications was 8. 9％(12/135) in DGT and 8. 8％ (9/102) in TPS (P=0. 986). Conclusion For patients with difficult biliary cannulation, TPS has higher success rate, shorter cannulation time, and similar complication rate compared with DGT. Endoscopists with skilled TPS procedure could select TPS as a preferred method in difficult biliary cannulation.

Double guidewire endoscopic technique, a major evolution in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: Results of a retrospective study with historical controls comparing two therapeutic sequential strategies.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Endoscopic access to the common bile duct (CBD) remains difficult in 10% of cases, requiring alternative techniques .CBD access was difficult after either five unsuccessful attempts, five unintentional insertions into the pancreatic duct or >10-min-long unsuccessful attempts. This retrospective study with historical controls aimed to evaluate the benefit of the double guidewire (DGW) technique after failure of standard CBD cannulation. METHODS: From January 2012 to December 2014, all patients requiring therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with difficult access to CBD were included in a Studied group. This group was compared to a historical ERCP control group from January 2009 to December 2011. In the Studied group, a sequential strategy including DGW technique was done when the guidewire was unintentionally passed into the pancreatic duct. In the control group, only pre-cut technique was used. RESULTS: Among the 538 patients with naive papilla eligible for ERCP, 73 had difficult CBD access. Successful CBD access rate was higher in the Studied group: 91% (50/55) versus 67% (12/18) P = 0.0215. Complication rates were similar in both groups: 28% versus 20%, P = 0.5207. LOS was shorter in the Studied group (9.2 ± 8.5 vs 14.4 ± 7.4 days, P = 0.0028). Post-ERCP cholangitis were lower in the Studied group: 2% (1/55) versus 22% (4/18), P = 0.0118. CONCLUSION: After standard cannulation failure, DGW technique increased successful CBD access rate and decreased LOS without increasing complications.

Comparison of sequential pancreatic duct guidewire placement technique and needle knife precut sphincterotomy for difficult biliary cannulation.

OBJECTIVE: Pancreatic duct guidewire placement (PDGP) includes double guidewire technique (DGT) and transpancreatic sphincterotomy (TPS). DGT can be switched to TPS with ease due to the existing guidewire in the pancreatic duct. In this study, we aimed to combine DGT and TPS as a single technique, named sequential PDGP, and to compare its performance with needle knife precut sphincterotomy (NKPS) in treating difficult biliary cannulation (BC). METHODS: A total of 83 patients with difficult BC were enrolled in this study. Of these, 63 underwent sequential PDGP and 20 underwent NKPS. Cannulation success rate, cannulation time and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)-related complications were prospectively recorded and compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Successful BC was achieved in 88.9% (56/63) of the patients in the sequential PDGP group compared with 70.0% (14/20) in the NKPS group (P = 0.095). Cannulation time was 7.49 ± 5.03 min in the sequential PDGP group and 10.60 ± 7.24 min in the NKPS group (P = 0.086). Post-ERCP pancreatitis occurred in 12.7% of patients in the sequential PDGP group and 10.0% in the NKPS group (P = 1.000). There was no significant difference in the rates of other complications (bleeding, perforation and cholangitis) between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Sequential PDGP is a safe and effective alternative method to NKPS in cases of difficult BC. In those with failed standard cannulation, sequential PDGP can be considered when the guidewire is inadvertently inserted into the pancreatic duct or can be placed in the pancreatic duct without difficulty.

Needle-knife fistulotomy vs double-guidewire technique in patients with repetitive unintentional pancreatic cannulations.

AIM: To compare the success rates and adverse events of early needle-knife fistulotomy (NKF) and double-guidewire technique (DGT) in patients with repetitive unintentional pancreatic cannulations. METHODS: From a total of 1650 patients admitted for diagnostic or therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) at a single tertiary care hospital (Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, South Korea) between January 2009 and December 2012, 134 (8.1%) patients with unsuccessful biliary cannulation after 5 min trial of conventional methods, together with 5 or more repetitive unintentional pancreatic cannulations, were enrolled in the study. Early NKF and DGT groups were assigned 67 patients each. In the DGT group, NKF was performed for an additional 7 min if successful cannulation was not achieved. RESULTS: The success rates with early NKF and the DGT were 79.1% (53/67) and 44.8% (30/67) (P < 0.001), respectively. The incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) was lower in the early NKF group than in the DGT group [4.5% (3/67) vs 14.9% (10/67), P = 0.041]. The mean cannulation times in the early NKF and DGT groups after assignment were 257 s and 312 s (P = 0.013), respectively. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that early NKF should be considered as the first approach to selective biliary cannulation in patients with repetitive unintentional pancreatic cannulations.

Comparison between double-guidewire technique and transpancreatic sphincterotomy technique for difficult biliary cannulation.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The aim of the present study was to compare the effectiveness and complications of the double-guidewire technique (DWT) with the transpancreatic sphincterotomy (TPS) technique. METHODS: From January 2013 to December 2014, 366 consecutive endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) procedures were carried out. Of 366 procedures, 354 procedures were carried out in patients with native major papilla biliary cannulation. A total of 279 consecutive therapeutic ERCP were included in the study and data of included patients were collected retrospectively. One hundred and thirty-seven procedures (49.1%) were done with DWT and 142 procedures (50.9%) were done with TPS for patients with difficult cannulation. The results and complications of ERCP were compared. RESULTS: Success rate of first-attempt cannulation was 62.0% in the DWT group and 81.0% in the TPS group (P = 0.00). Final rate of successful cannulation of the two biliary cannulation techniques was 86.9% and 90.8%, respectively (P = 0.09). Cannulation time in the DWT group was 7.8 ± 1.7 min compared with 3.7 ± 2.3 min in the TPS group (P = 0.00). Overall incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP), hemorrhage, perforation and cholangitis was 1.8%, 1.1%, 0.4% and 1.1%, respectively. Adverse event rate was 2.19% in the DWT group and 7.04% in the TPS group (P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: DWT and TPS procedures were safe and effective. Overall cannulation rate was similar between the groups. Although DWT had a longer cannulation time, it could be considered the preferred technique in patients with failed standard cannulation for lower adverse event rate.

Is the double-guidewire technique superior to the pancreatic duct guidewire technique in cases of pancreatic duct opacification?

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Pancreatic duct guidewire placement (P-GW) techniques include both the injection cannulation technique with a contrast medium and wire-guided cannulation without contrast injection for selective biliary cannulation; the latter is the so-called "double-guidewire technique" (D-GW). The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes between P-GW and D-GW for biliary cannulation. METHODS: The procedures for biliary cannulation with a naïve papilla were performed in a total of 363 cases. We divided the patients chronologically, according to the time period during which the procedures were performed, into two groups: group A, P-GW performed from March 2008 to June 2009; and group B, D-GW performed from July 2009 to December 2010. The success rates and complication rates were evaluated in each group. RESULTS: Biliary cannulation was successful in 31 (81.6%) patients in the P-GW group and 34 patients (82.9%) in the D-GW group. The onsets of postendoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis (PEP) occurred in the P-GW and D-GW groups were four (10.5%) and three (7.3%) patients, respectively, and all were mild cases (P = 0.616). The frequency of hyperamylasemia and the serum amylase level tended to be lower in the D-GW group than in the P-GW group (P = 0.213). There was a statistically significant difference on the onsets of PEP in the GW and non-GW groups (P = 0.04, 8.9% and 1.1%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Both the D-GW and P-GW techniques were equally effective for difficult biliary cannulation. Furthermore, the complication rates, including PEP, were similar in both techniques. A prospective randomized trial is warranted.