Uterine tube evisceration during drainage tube removal - A rare case report.

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE: Drainage tubes are commonly used to remove unwanted fluid after surgery. However, they are not indicated in all situations, and there is no evidence to support their common utilization. CASE PRESENTATION: A 31-year-old woman at 38 weeks of gestation with a history of five cesarean sections presented with lower abdominal pain following a tonic-clonic epileptic seizure. Emergency surgery was performed due to fetal distress, and the uterus was found to be ruptured. After delivering the baby and closing the uterus, a drainage tube was inserted into the pouch of Douglas. Two days after surgery, the right ampulla and infundibulum were eviscerated from the drain site during the drainage tube removal. A second surgery was performed to reduce the herniated uterine tube. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: Drainage tubes are typically easily removed without complications. Some reported complications related to drainage tube removal include herniation, anchoring and suctioning of the uterine tube to the drainage tube, knotting with the colonic epiploica, and fracturing and retraction of the drainage tube due to adhesions. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first reported case of uterine tube evisceration during drainage tube removal. CONCLUSION: Evisceration after drainage tube removal is very rare. We believe that this is the first report of immediate evisceration after the removal process. Such complications can be avoided with more restricted instructions for the use of drainage tubes and more researches on the reasons for these complications.

An Analysis of Preoperative Inflammatory Indicators That Influence the Drainage Tube Retention Time in Patients with Breast Cancer Surgery.

Objective: The study was aimed to investigate the influence factor between preoperative inflammatory indicators and drainage tube retention time in patients with breast cancer. Methods: This retrospective study enrolled 121 patients with breast cancer who were undergoing surgery between October 2020 and June 2021. The enumeration data were used the Chi-square test, and the measurement data were used the t-test analysis. The univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were performed to access the risk factors for affecting drainage tube retention time in patients with breast cancer. The receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was performed to test the prediction effect of the model. Results: Through the median extraction time of postoperative drainage tube retention time, all patients were divided into two groups: drainage tube retention time (DTRT) < 13 (d) and drainage tube retention time (DTRT) ≥ 13 (d). The results showed that type of surgery, total lymph nodes (TLN), pathological T stage, NLR were related to the drainage tube retention time (P<0.05). Moreover, the univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis performed that Hb, type of surgery, pathological T stage, chest wall drainage tube, NRI were the independent risk predictors of affecting drainage tube retention time. Furthermore, a significant correlation existed between NRI and drainage tube retention at different times (P < 0.05). Conclusion: NRI is an independent risk factor for postoperative drainage tube extraction time and can effectively predict the probability of drainage tube retention time. Thus, it can also provide personalized nursing intervention for patients with breast cancer after drainage tube retention time and the rehabilitation process.

Chest tube removal at different gas flows in prolonged air leak: a randomized non-inferiority trial.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the safety and feasibility of removing drainage tubes at larger size of air leak in patients with prolonged air leak after pulmonary surgery. METHODS: Ninety-five patients who underwent pulmonary surgery with prolonged air leak in our centre were enrolled in this randomized controlled, single-centre, non-inferiority study. The drainage tube was clamped with a stable size of air leak observed over the last 6 h, which was quantified by gas flow rate using the digital drainage system. The control group (n = 48) and the study group (n = 46) had their drainage tube clamped at 0-20 ml/min and 60-80 ml/min, respectively. We continuously monitored clinical symptoms, conducted imaging and laboratory examinations, and decided whether to reopen the drainage tube. RESULTS: The reopening rate in the study group was not lower than that in the control group (2.08% vs 6.52%, P > 0.05). The absolute difference in reopening rate was 4.44% (95% confidence interval -0.038 to 0.126), with an upper limit of 12.6% below the non-inferiority margin (15%). There were significant differences in the length of stay [16.5 (13-24.75) vs 13.5 (12-19.25), P = 0.017] and the duration of drainage [12 (9.25-18.50) vs 10 (8-12.25), P = 0.007] between the control and study groups. No notable differences were observed in chest X-ray results 14 days after discharge or in the readmission rate. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with prolonged air leak, removing drainage tubes at larger size of air leak demonstrated similar safety compared to smaller size of air leak, and can shorten both length of stay and drainage duration. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Name of registry: Gas flow threshold for safe removal of chest drainage in patients with alveolar-pleural fistula prolonged air leak after pulmonary surgery. Registration number: ChiCTR2200067120. URL: https://www.chictr.org.cn/.

Talc slurry pleurodesis in patients with secondary intractable pneumothorax: A phase 2 study.

BACKGROUND: Secondary pneumothorax, which occurs most commonly in the elderly, is caused by underlying diseases. Cardiac dysfunction and other organ inefficiencies may render surgical repair impossible. Such non-operative and poor-risk cases are targets for pleurodesis, which involves the instillation of chemicals or irritants to the thoracic cavity through injection, bronchoscopic bronchial occlusion, or other procedures. Sterile graded talc has been used for pleurodesis mainly in Europe and the United States; however, only a few studies and case series investigating this topic have been published. This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of talc slurry pleurodesis. METHODS: Patients with inoperable secondary intractable pneumothorax, who were not candidates for surgical repair, were recruited. Four grams of sterilized talc was suspended in 50 mL of physiological saline and injected through a tube into the pleural cavity. Additional 50 mL of saline was subsequently injected through the same channel to clean the residual saline in the injection tube. Another additional talc instillation was allowed to control persistent air leakage. The primary endpoint was the proportion of drainage tube removal within 30 days after talc pleurodesis. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients were included in this study. In 23 out of 28 patients, the drainage tube could be removed within 30 days of talc instillation (82.1 %, 95 % CI = 63.1-93.9), exceeding the threshold of 36.0 % (p < 0.0001). The most common event was pain (11/28 patients, 39.3 %). CONCLUSIONS: Talc slurry pleurodesis is effective for intractable secondary pneumothorax, with minor side effects.

Efficacy of transanal drainage tube placement in preventing anastomotic leakage after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in patients with ulcerative colitis.

BACKGROUND: Transanal drainage tube (TDT) is used to prevent anastomotic leakage after surgery for rectal cancer. However, it remains unclear whether intraoperative TDT placement is also useful in preventing anastomotic leakage after ileal pouch-anal or ileal pouch-anal canal anastomosis (IPAA) in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of intraoperative TDT placement in preventing anastomotic leakage after IPAA in patients with UC. METHODS: Patients with UC who underwent proctectomy with IPAA in the study institution between January 2000 and December 2021 were enrolled in this retrospective cohort study. The relationship between TDT placement and anastomotic leakage was evaluated by logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: The study population included 168 patients. TDT was placed intraoperatively in 103 of the 168 patients (61.3%). The rate of anastomotic leakage was significantly lower in the TDT group than in the non-TDT group (7.8% vs 18.5%, p = 0.037). Reoperation was not needed in any patient in the TDT group whereas two reoperations were necessary in the non-TDT group (3.1%). By logistic regression analysis, intraoperative TDT placement was an independent protective factor for anastomotic leakage. CONCLUSIONS: TDT placement was significantly associated with anastomotic leakage of IPAA in patients with UC undergoing surgery. Although two-stage surgery with ileostomy is usually preferred in UC surgery, our findings suggest that TDT placement might contribute to the improvement of postoperative outcomes after UC surgery.

How to do it: rescue duct-to-duct biliary reconstruction techniques to avoid severe biliary complications of hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma.

There are few reports on duct-to-duct biliary reconstruction for complex liver resection with limited bile duct resection. We performed duct-to-duct biliary reconstruction in two patients undergoing limited bile duct resection where Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy (HJ) was difficult. An external biliary drainage tube was placed routinely at the anastomotic site to prevent stenosis. In case 1, the tumor-infiltrated part of the left hepatic duct (LHD) was resected and the LHD was repaired using duct-to-duct reconstruction with interrupted sutures. In case 2, after the tumor-infiltrated part of the LHD and posterior hepatic duct (PHD) were resected, T-tube reconstruction was performed on the PHD, and the LHD was anastomosed using interrupted sutures for the posterior wall and a round ligament patch for the anterior wall. Our literature review suggests that an external biliary drainage tube with stenting over the anastomosis may reduce the risk of biliary complications.

Design and application of small-diameter closed thoracic drainage tube fixation following lung wedge resection: A randomised prospective study.

BACKGROUND: The use of indwelling closed thoracic drainage tubes in the wedge resection of the lungs is of great significance to postoperative recovery. However, there are potential risks. OBJECTIVE: To explore the design feasibility and application effect of triple-buffer-system-fixed small-diameter (18 F) thoracic closed drainage tubes following lung wedge resection. METHODS: A total of 136 patients with indwelling thoracic drainage tubes following pulmonary wedge resection were recruited, with 70 patients allocated to the control group and 66 to the experimental group. The drainage tube in the experimental group was fixed with the triple-buffer system, while that in the control group was fixed using the conventional lifting platform method. The incidence of unplanned extubation, the indwelling time of the drainage tube and the time and material costs, as well as information regarding any subcutaneous emphysema and skin tension blisters, were recorded following the operation. The pain and degree of comfort were assessed using a chi-square test and a rank sum t-test to compare the differences between the two groups. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in terms of age, gender and sweating between the two groups. Compared with the control group, the unplanned extubation rate of the experimental group was lower (χ2= 8.513; P= 0.004), the indwelling time of the drainage tube was shorter (t= 2.108; P= 0.037), the cumulative material cost was lower (t= 3.778; P< 0.001), the time cost was also lower (Z= 2.717; P= 0.008), the degree of comfort was higher (Z= 2.752; P= 0.006), and the degree of pain was lower (Z= 4.019; P< 0.001). The incidence of subcutaneous emphysema was significantly lower in the experimental group than in the control group (χ2= 8.513; P= 0.004). CONCLUSION: The use of the triple-buffer system to fix small-diameter (18 F) thoracic closed drainage tubes can reduce the unplanned extubation rate, indwelling time of the drainage tube and the incidence of adverse reactions.

Precise placement of a triple-cavity drainage tube by guide wire exchange method for esophagojejunal anastomotic fistula after gastrectomy.

This is a letter to the editor on a study by Ding et al. on the role of the three-tube method via precise interventional placement for esophagojejunal anastomotic fistula after gastrectomy. They suggest using transnasal insertion of abscess drainage catheter, jejunal decompression tube, and jejunal nutrition tube under fluoroscopy as a simple, minimally invasive, effective, and safe method for treating esophagojejunal anastomotic fistula. Compared to Ding et al.'s method, we presented a new procedure for the esophagojejunal anastomotic fistula. In this procedure, we precisely place a homemade triple-cavity drainage tube by guide wire exchange method near the esophagojejunal anastomotic fistula for continuous irrigation and negative pressure suction, which can provide adequate drainage and result in fistula's self-healing. This procedure can also be performed at bedside without any anesthesia; therefore, it is a more simple, minimally invasive, effective, and safe treatment for esophagojejunal anastomotic fistula.

T­tube versus internal drainage tube in laparoscopic common bile duct exploration.

The 203 patients who underwent laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for choledocholithiasis were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into internal drainage tube group (n=87) and T-tube group (n=116). Total bilirubin, direct bilirubin, alanine aminotransferase (AST), aspartate aminotransferase (ALT), the diameter of common bile duct, number of stones, operation time, intraoperative bleeding, postoperative hospital stay and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups. Possible influencing factors were selected as independent variables, and the operation mode was selected as the dependent variable for multifactor unconditional logistic regression analysis. There were no significant differences in the sex, age, total bilirubin, direct bilirubin, AST, ALT, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospital stay and postoperative biliary leaks between the two groups (P>0.05). The diameter of the common bile duct was smaller and the incidence of multiple stones in the common bile duct was lower in the internal drainage tube group compared with that in the T-tube group (P<0.05). The results of multifactor unconditional logistic regression analysis demonstrated that the diameter of the common bile duct and the number of stones in the common bile duct were associated with the operation mode as influencing factors. In conclusion, Patients with multiple stones in the common bile duct or with a wide diameter of the common bile duct are more likely to have T-tube placed rather than an internal drainage tube.

Which treatment strategy is optimal for acute left-sided malignant colonic obstruction? A Bayesian meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to determine the best treatment for acute left-sided malignant colonic obstruction (ALMCO) among emergency surgery (ES), self-expanding metallic stent (SEMS), transanal drainage tube (TD), and decompressive stoma (DS). METHOD: Articles that compared two or more treatments of ALMCO were searched from PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase. Network meta-analyses were performed to calculate the outcomes of primary anastomosis, stoma creation, morbidity, mortality, and 5-year survival. RESULTS: Fifty-one articles met inclusion criteria. TD was the optimal treatment in performing primary anastomosis [probability of ranking first (Pro-1) 0.96], while ES was the worst [probability of ranking fourth (Pro-4) 0.99]. More permanent stoma was formed in ES and TD groups than in SEMS and DS groups [OR (95%CI): TD vs SEMS: 4.12 (1.89, 9.45); TD vs DS: 3.39 (1.46, 8.75); ES vs DS: 2.55 (1.73, 4.17); SEMS vs ES: 0.33 (0.24, 0.42)]. More morbidity occurred in ES group than in SEMS group [OR (95%CI): ES vs SEMS: 1.44 (1.14, 1.82)]. Besides, SEMS was ranked first in avoiding infection (Pro-4 0.95). For in-hospital mortality, ES was ranked first (Pro-1 0.93). TD was ranked first in recurrence (Pro-1 0.97) and metastasis (Pro-1 0.98). There was no discrepancy in 5-year overall and disease-free survival among all strategies. CONCLUSION: SEMS as a bridge to surgery reduces stoma formation, and morbidity especially the infection rate with relatively great oncological outcomes. Therefore, SEMS should be recommended first for ALMCO in the medical center with experience and conditions.

The effect of reinforcing sutures and trans-anal drainage tube on the outcome of laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer: propensity score­matched analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer is currently the predominant treatment modality for rectal tumors, with an ongoing focus on reducing the incidence of postoperative complications. In an effort to decrease the occurrence of anastomotic leakage, two additional steps worth considering are reinforcing the anastomosis with a barbed suture and retaining an anal drain as part of the procedure. The results of the operation were analyzed by comparing them to cases where the anastomosis was performed with a stapler alone. METHODS: This study retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent laparoscopic radical rectal cancer surgery between July 2020 and March 2023. The patients were categorized into three cohorts based on the postoperative management following instrumented anastomosis: cohort A, the instrumented anastomosis alone group; cohort B, the reinforced suture group; and cohort C, the reinforced suture and indwelling transanal drainage tube group. Propensity score matching was performed twice in a 1:1 ratio, comparing cohort B to cohort A and cohort C to cohort B. The objective was to compare the benefits and drawbacks among the different groups in terms of operative time, postoperative outcomes and operative costs. RESULTS: 529 patients with laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer were eligible for inclusion. the instrumented anastomosis alone group, reinforced suture group and the reinforced suture and indwelling transanal drainage tube group were performed in 205 patients, 198 patients and 126 patients, respectively. Cohort A and Cohort B differed in three variables after PSM: total operative time (p = 0.018), postoperative hospital stay (p < 0.001) and incidence of anastomotic leakage (p = 0.038). Cohort B had a longer total operative time, shorter postoperative hospital stay and a lower incidence of anastomotic leakage. Similarly, cohort C had less postoperative drainage (P = 0.01) and a longer postoperative hospital stay (P = 0.003) when cohort B and cohort C were matched for propensity scores. There was no significant difference in the cost of surgery between the three cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: The incorporation of barbed suture reinforcement significantly reduces the occurrence of postoperative anastomotic leakage in rectal cancer surgeries. On the other hand, although trans-anal drainage was used as an additional measure to the reinforcement suture of the anastomosis, the utilization of trans-anal drainage tubes does not demonstrate a significant improvement in surgical outcomes.

Transanal drainage tube for the prevention of anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Background: Anastomotic leakage (AL) is a serious complication of anterior resection for rectal cancer. The use of transanal drainage tubes (TDT) during surgery to prevent AL remains controversial. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to determine the efficacy of TDT in reducing AL. Methods: Relevant data and studies published from inception until November 1, 2022, were retrieved from PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases to compare the incidence of AL after anterior resection for rectal cancer with and without TDT. Results: This meta-analysis included 5 RCTs comprising 1385 patients. The results showed that the intraoperative use of TDT could not reduce the incidence of AL after rectal cancer surgery (risk ratio [RR], 0.91; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.52-1.59; p = 0.75). A subgroup analysis of different degrees of AL revealed that TDT did not reduce the incidence of postoperative grade B AL (RR, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.67-2.09; p = 0.56) but decreased the incidence of grade C AL (RR, 0.28; 95% CI: 0.12-0.64; p = 0.003). Further, TDT did not reduce the incidence of AL in patients with rectal cancer and a stoma (RR, 2.40; 95% CI, 1.01-5.71; p = 0.05). Conclusion: TDT were ineffective in reducing the overall incidence of AL, but they might be beneficial in reducing the incidence of grade C AL in patients who underwent anterior resection. However, additional multicenter RCTs with larger sample sizes based on unified control standards and TDT indications are warranted to validate these findings.

Postoperative intractable leg pain caused by dislocation of drainage tube.

Background: A wide variety of conditions can cause recurrent postoperative lumbar radiculopathy. Case Description: A 49-year-old female developed sudden recurrent postoperative right leg pain after a right-sided L5S1 microdiskectomy for a herniated disc. Emergent magnetic resonance and computed tomography studies demonstrated migration of the drainage tube into the right L5S1 lateral recess compromising the S1 nerve root. Following drain removal, the patient's right reg pain immediately resolved. Conclusion: Migration of a lumbar wound drain into the operated lateral recess following a lumbar diskectomy may result in acute, recurrent/intractable radicular pain that was readily resolved with drain removal.

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy after transcatheter arterial embolisation for haemobilia due to a pseudoaneurysm in the gallbladder: A case report.

Pseudoaneurysms of the cystic artery are a rare but significant complication of acute cholecystitis. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy may be a safe alternative to open cholecystectomy in such cases. We report the case of a female patient in her seventies, who presented with anaemia, jaundice, and hepatic dysfunction during hospitalisation for right knee pyogenic arthritis. The patient had no pain in the right upper quadrant. Her serum haemoglobin level was 6.5 g/dL, and upper gastrointestinal endoscopy revealed no abnormalities. Six days later, jaundice worsened, and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography revealed bloody bile. An endoscopic biliary drainage tube was inserted at the discretion of the gastroenterology department. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography revealed a haematoma in the gallbladder and a pseudoaneurysm in the lateral wall of the gallbladder. On the same day, the endoscopic biliary drainage tube was replaced with an endoscopic nasobiliary drainage tube, which indicated the degree of haemorrhage and enabled lavage of the lumen in cases of obstruction. The next day, angiography revealed a pseudoaneurysm of the deep branch of the cystic artery and coil embolisation was performed at the periphery of the cystic artery. Uninterrupted laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed. Although laparoscopic cholecystectomy is difficult when bleeding is uncontrolled, it was safely performed following haemostasis using transcatheter arterial embolisation. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is feasible in haemodynamically stable patients with cystic artery pseudoaneurysms after transcatheter arterial embolisation.

Drainage Tube Placement for the Management of Rebleeding After Vascular Embolization in a Patient With Neurofibromatosis Type 1.

Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF-1), a hereditary disease caused by a mutation of a gene on chromosome 17q11.2, is associated with manifestations in several organs. Although infrequent, vascular abnormalities are a complication of NF-1, and they are the second most common cause of death in patients with NF-1. Repairing the nutrient artery and achieving hemostasis are difficult once the artery has failed, thereby resulting in poor treatment outcomes. Herein, we report a case of a patient with NF-1 who presented with an enormous cervical hematoma caused by bleeding from a branch of the external carotid artery. Vascular embolization was performed initially; however, rebleeding from the embolized site occurred. Following the removal of the hematoma, drainage tube placement was effective in preventing micro-bleeding. Thus, drainage tube placement may be an effective treatment option in patients with rebleeding.

Feasibility of Biliary Drainage Using a Novel Integrated Biliary Stent and Nasobiliary Drainage Catheter System for Acute Cholangitis.

Background Acute cholangitis is caused by cholestasis and bacterial infection, and if exacerbated, sepsis may occur and be fatal. Biliary drainage is recommended for acute cholangitis regardless of severity, except in some cases of mild acute cholangitis, in which antibiotics are effective. A novel integrated device comprising a biliary drainage stent and a nasobiliary drainage tube, called the UMIDAS NB stent (UMIDAS Inc., Kanagawa, Japan), was developed. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of biliary drainage using the UMIDAS NB stent outside type for acute cholangitis in clinical practice. Methods Patients with acute cholangitis with common bile duct stones or distal biliary strictures who underwent biliary drainage with the UMIDAS NB stent outside type at our institution between January 2022 and December 2022 were examined retrospectively. The UMIDAS NB stent outside type was placed transpapillary using endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Patients with biliary drainage stent placement other than the UMIDAS NB stent outside type on the same ERCP session and patients with acute cholecystitis were excluded. Results A total of 13 patients were included in this study. The severity of cholangitis was mild in four cases, moderate in five, and severe in four. There were eight cases of common bile duct stones and five cases of pancreatic cancer. The stent diameter was 7 French scale (Fr) in five cases and 8.5 Fr in eight cases. The median procedure time was 20 minutes. Clinical success was achieved in all 13 patients (100%). No treatment-related adverse events were observed. Unintended removal of the nasobiliary drainage tube was not observed. There were no cases of biliary drainage stent dislocation with nasobiliary drainage tube removal. Conclusions Although the sample size was small, our study demonstrated that biliary drainage with the UMIDAS NB stent outside type was effective and safe for patients with acute cholangitis who had common bile duct stones or distal biliary strictures, regardless of the severity of cholangitis.

The "Tube Submarine Technique": a safe and easy technique to place an external drainage tube during hepaticojejunostomy in minimally invasive surgery.

PURPOSE: Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is a standard procedure for various pancreatic head lesions. Recently, minimally invasive surgery (MIS), including laparoscopic PD (LPD) or robotic PD (RPD), has been widely performed. The hepaticojejunostomy (HJ) technique in MIS is more difficult than that in open procedures, and the placement of an external drainage tube (EDT) is not common in MIS owing to its complicated procedure. Here, we demonstrate the "Tube Submarine Technique" (TST) to facilitate EDT placement without hampering the anastomotic maneuver in MIS. METHODS: After resection of the MIS-PD, the jejunal stump was extracted from the umbilical incision, and a small jejunostomy was performed. A retrograde insertion of the EDT was carried out from this hole towards the jejunal stump. A 4-0 suture was applied through the tip and neighboring side hole, and ligated with a margin of approximately 1-2 cm without needle release. The needle was passed through the anterior jejunal limb wall from the inside to the outside, and the tube was placed into the jejunal limb like a submarine and fixed to the anterior inside wall. After posterior wall suturing during HJ in MIS, the tube-fixing suture was cut immediately below the knot, the tube-like surface of the submarine was pulled up from the jejunal hole and inserted into the bile duct. RESULTS: The procedure of tube fixation inside the jejunal limb and tube surfacing was safe and easy with no complications. CONCLUSION: The TST can significantly help in the placement of an EDT in MIS.

Postoperative ST-segment elevation caused by mechanical compression of the native right coronary artery by a pericardial drainage tube.

ST-segment elevation is often the first remarkable sign of postoperative cardiac ischaemia. It requires prompt diagnostic measures and an early treatment to improve the patient's outcome. We describe a case of early postoperative ST-segment elevation due to mechanical compression of the native right coronary artery by a pericardial drainage tube in a patient after replacement of the ascending aorta.