Pseudoephedrine-induced Fixed Drug Eruption in a Scuba Diver With Recurrent Palmoplantar Exfoliation.

Objectives: This report presents a case of pseudoephedrine-induced nonpigmented bullous fixed drug eruption (NBFDE) manifesting as recurrent palmoplantar exfoliation in a scuba diver. It emphasizes the importance of considering drug allergies in the differential diagnosis when divers present with peeling hands and soles. Methods: A 38-year-old female scuba diver experiencing recurrent palmoplantar exfoliation underwent a clinical evaluation, patch testing, an interferon-gamma enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISpot) assay, and graded drug challenges with pseudoephedrine and phenylephrine. Results: Patch testing yielded negative results; however, the ELISpot assay indicated a strong immune response to pseudoephedrine. A graded challenge involving pseudoephedrine successfully reproduced the symptoms, confirming a diagnosis of pseudoephedrine-induced NBFDE. Subsequently, a challenge with phenylephrine elicited a milder reaction, suggesting it as a potential alternative medication for the patient. Conclusions: This case highlights NBFDE as a potential cause of skin peeling in scuba divers who are allergic to pseudoephedrine. It emphasizes the importance of considering drug allergies when diagnosing palmoplantar exfoliation in divers and underscores the need for a thorough evaluation of medication use in this group. Alternative medications and management strategies should be considered for divers with a pseudoephedrine allergy to prevent ear barotrauma while minimizing the risk of adverse skin reactions.

Fixed Drug Eruption on the Penis Due to Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole: A Case Report.

A fixed drug eruption (FDE) is a common dermatological drug side effect but can go unnoticed. It is characterized by an oval-circular erythematous patch, sometimes with itching and burning pain localized in many parts of the body, such as the face, lips, torso, limbs, and anogenital area. Its diagnosis is generally clinical, but it can be mistaken for other dermatological diseases seen in primary care, like balanitis, genital herpes, and lichen planus. It can be a diagnostic challenge for primary care physicians when it is not considered. We present a 26-year-old man who developed an FDE in the penis with intense itching and burning pain during his labor hours after 15 minutes of consuming an oral dose of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for a gastrointestinal infection. The patient was treated with topical corticosteroids twice per day and educated to avoid the use of the antibiotic again. In the next few days, the symptoms fully resolved, and he developed post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation in the area. The primary management of an FDE is immediate discontinuation of the offending drug and use of topical corticosteroids to prevent possible generalized reactions and recurrence of lesions. Therefore, the primary care physician should consider this condition in his or her diagnosis when new dermatologic lesions occur after exposure to a new drug.

Independent risk factor of drug eruption in immune checkpoint inhibitors treated liver cancer patients: high systemic immune-inflammation index.

PURPOSE: The clinical application of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has significantly improved the prognosis of liver cancer patients. However, drug eruption associated with ICI monotherapy or combination therapy not only impacts the quality of life and treatment progress of liver cancer patients but also poses a potential threat to their lives. The study aims to investigate the risk factors of drug eruption in liver cancer patients undergoing ICIs in real-world settings. METHODS: We retrospectively collected data from liver cancer patients who underwent ICI therapies at the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University between 2021 and 2022. A propensity score matching (PSM) method was employed to match 31 liver cancer patients with ICI-related drug eruption (drug eruption group) to 228 liver cancer patients without immune-related adverse reactions (control group) in a 1:2 ratio, creating two groups of patients with comparable baseline characteristics. Subsequently, logistic regression analysis was then conducted to analyze the clinical risk factors associated with drug eruption caused by ICIs. RESULTS: Before PSM, there were statistically significant differences between the drug eruption group (31 cases) and the control group (228 cases) in two variables: Child-Pugh liver function classification and presence of vascular invasion (both p < 0.05). However, after PSM, no statistically significant differences were found in the clinical variables between the drug eruption group (28 cases) and the control group (52 cases). Univariate analysis revealed significantly higher levels of aspartate amino-transferase, alanine aminotransferase, glutamyl transpeptidase, and systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) and a significantly lower rate of liver cancer resection surgery before immunotherapy in liver cancer patients with drug eruption compared to the control group (p < 0.05). Multivariate analysis indicated that an elevated SII level before immunotherapy was significantly associated with the occurrence of drug eruption in liver cancer patients treated with ICIs (p < 0.05). The predictive performance of SII before immunotherapy in liver cancer patients for ICI-related drug eruption yielded an area under the receiver operator characteristic curve of 0.852, with a critical value of 749.189. Sensitivity and specificity were determined as 85.7% and 75%, respectively (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Elevated systemic immune-inflammation index is identified as a risk factor for drug eruption occurrence in liver cancer patients treated with ICI therapies.

Lichenoid Drug Eruption Secondary to Adalimumab: A Case Report.

Adalimumab, an anti-tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), is widely prescribed for many autoimmune diseases and chronic inflammatory skin diseases such as hidradenitis suppurative, psoriasis, etc. We report a case of lichenoid drug eruption secondary to adalimumab, a rare side effect, in a 62-year-old female with ulcerative colitis. The skin eruption appeared two weeks after initiating adalimumab. A skin biopsy was taken, and the histopathological findings correlated with a lichenoid drug eruption. Although rare, drug-induced lichen planus has been associated with adalimumab. Early recognition and a high index of suspicion are key in the prompt management of these cases. The discontinuation of adalimumab must be carefully weighed against its therapeutic benefits, as the discontinuation might trigger a severe form of inflammation in the primary autoimmune disease being treated. Extreme caution, early intervention, and a multidisciplinary approach are best for the overall well-being and optimal care of the individual.

Oral lichenoid drug eruption due to osimertinib for lung cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR) are linked with side effects involving skin and mucosa. Herein, we present a unique case of oral lichenoid drug eruption (LDE) in a patient treated with osimertinib. CASE REPORT: A 75-year-old woman was diagnosed with metastatic EGFR-mutated lung adenocarcinoma, and started on osimertinib 80 mg PO daily. At 24 months of therapy, the patient developed a painful, red, and white striated oral lesion involving the left buccal mucosa and the adjacent buccal aspect of gingivae. Biopsy showed oral LDE. Causality assessment between osimertinib and the oral LDE via Naranjo Adverse Drug Reaction probability scale revealed a score of 5. MANAGEMENT AND OUTCOME: Osimetinib discontinuation was not felt to be in the best interest of the patient. Therefore, diphenhydramine HCL mouthwash every 6 h PRN (before meals) was started. Spicy and hot foods were discontinued. At a four-week follow-up visit, the patient reported moderate improvement in her symptoms. CONCLUSION: Oral LDEs are considered premalignant lesions as they can transform into squamous cell carcinoma; therefore, regular follow-up is needed. Awareness of this potential side effect of osimertinib would also prevent unnecessary (and potentially costly) work-up and lead to its prompt diagnosis and treatment.

Clinicopathologic features of pityriasis rosea-like drug eruption secondary to imatinib: A case report and review of the literature.

Pityriasis rosea is an acute, self-limited exanthem that typically occurs in adolescence and young adulthood, classically featuring ovoid erythematous and scaly lesions on the trunk and proximal extremities. While its cause is not definitively known, the classic form of pityriasis rosea may result from the reactivation of latent human herpesvirus (HHV) infections (HHV-6 and HHV-7). Interestingly, drug eruptions that clinically and/or histopathologically resemble pityriasis rosea have also been reported. These pityriasis rosea-like drug eruptions tend to occur at an older age and have a shorter duration than the classic type. As there are different management paradigms, the distinction between classic pityriasis rosea and the mimicking drug eruption is important to recognize. Herein, we report a case of a pityriasis rosea-like drug eruption that occurred in association with imatinib mesylate treatment for chronic myeloid leukemia. We also review the clinicopathologic features of reported cases of pityriasis rosea-like drug eruption, including those due to imatinib. While the clinical morphology of the cutaneous drug-related eruption mimics the lesions seen in classic pityriasis rosea, the presence of unique histopathologic findings, including necrotic keratinocytes, interface dermatitis, and eosinophils, may aid in distinction.

Enfortumab vedotin-induced cutaneous eruption: Ring mitotic figures as a distinctive histopathologic feature.

Enfortumab vedotin (EV), a nectin-4-binding agent that affects microtubules, has become standard therapy for advanced urothelial carcinoma. The agent, now given in combination with pembrolizumab, frequently induces cutaneous reactions. Here, we report a severe EV-induced cutaneous eruption. A 58-year-old woman with metastatic urothelial carcinoma developed a rash after receiving simultaneous first doses of EV and pembrolizumab. The eruption began on the flank and spread to involve her trunk and extremities with prominent involvement of folds, including the axillae and medial thighs. Skin biopsy revealed extensive vacuolar alteration of the basal epidermis and numerous epidermal keratinocytic mitotic figures, often suprabasilar, including ring and "starburst" forms. The findings supported a diagnosis of EV-induced eruption. With EV cessation and systemic corticosteroids, the rash resolved over a few weeks. Pembrolizumab was restarted as monotherapy, and the patient's cancer showed a significant radiographic treatment response at 3 months. An emerging literature of small series and case reports, largely from oncologic literature, presents the histopathology of EV-induced cutaneous eruption as a vacuolar interface dermatitis with the inconsistently reported feature of arrested mitotic figures. This case study demonstrates distinctive clinical and histopathologic features of EV-induced eruption, which may inform dermatologic and oncologic management.

Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis Caused by Eribulin.

Eribulin, a chemotherapy drug classified as a microtubule inhibitor, is known to target cell microtubule structures, impeding cancer cell growth and spread. This paper discusses a rare case of toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) induced by eribulin in a patient with angiosarcoma, marking it as an uncommon adverse reaction. This patient developed severe mucosal and skin lesions after the third dose of eribulin. Laboratory tests and a skin biopsy confirmed the diagnosis of TEN. The patient responded well to steroid therapy, although skin eruptions reoccurred with further eribulin treatment. This case highlights the need for further study on the immunological effects of eribulin, especially concerning severe drug eruptions potentially related to its impact on microtubule dynamics and immune cell functions.

Clinical Profile of Patients with Lichenoid Drug Eruption: A Observational Study.

Background: Lichenoid drug eruption (LDE) is an uncommon cutaneous adverse drug reaction, where a variety of drugs used in day-to-day clinical practice have been implicated. Objective: To describe the clinico-demographic characteristics of patients with LDE and to identify the most likely drugs involved. Methods: In this prospective, observational study, consecutive patients with LDE presenting to the dermatology department of a tertiary teaching hospital were included. The clinico-demographic profile of patients with LDE and implicated drugs was noted. Treatment of drug reaction along with outcome was also documented. Naranjo adverse drug reaction probability scale was used for causality assessment of the drug reactions. A thorough literature review on LDE was also undertaken due to the paucity of existing literature. Results: A total of 15 patients (11 males and 4 females) with LDE were evaluated. Their age ranged from 37 to 61 years, with a mean of 51.53 ± 7.59 years. Anti-hypertensive medications (40%) were the most common culprit agent, followed by antitubercular drugs (33.4%), anti-diabetic agents (13.3%), and others (13.3%). The latent period (time from drug initiation to the appearance of a cutaneous eruption) varied from 15 days to 6 months (mean 2.2 months). Cutaneous involvement was generalized in 73.4% and photo-distributed lesions in 26.6%. Drug provocation test was done to identify the culprit drug. According to the Naranjo adverse drug reaction probability scale, one-third of LDEs were "definite," whereas two-thirds were designated as "probable." Conclusion: LDE is more common in the elderly population. The latent period is comparatively longer in LDE than in other common drug reactions. Prompt recognition and withdrawal of suspected drug are essential to minimize disease morbidity.

Fixed drug eruption secondary to etoricoxib.

Fixed drug eruptions (FDE) are adverse cutaneous drug reactions and a form of delayed type 4 hypersensitivity reaction characterised by recurrent lesions at the same site each time a specific drug is taken. They most commonly result in cutaneous lesions presenting as an erythematous round or oval macule or plaque. FDEs have rarely been reported to affect oral mucous membranes and tend to have a bullous or aphthous-like appearance with erythema. Almost half of patients report an increase in the severity of symptoms with prolonged exposure to the offending medication. The most commonly attributed classes of drug are antibiotics (tetracyclines and sulphonamides) alongside non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Cutaneous adverse reactions to etoricoxib, a highly selective COX-2 inhibitor, have been reported. Here we describe an adverse reaction restricted to the oral mucosa.

Pregabalin-induced delayed cutaneous hypersensitivity reaction occurring after 40 days of use: a case report.

Pregabalin is the first-line treatment for neuropathic pain. Cases of cutaneous hypersensitivity reactions caused by pregabalin generally occur within 2 weeks of initiating medication. We report a rare case of a delayed cutaneous hypersensitivity reaction caused by pregabalin, which was confirmed by a drug provocation test. A 72-year-old man with severe herpes zoster neuralgia developed maculopapular drug eruption covering 80% to 90% of his total body surface area after 40 days of combined multidrug analgesia. A drug provocation test for pregabalin was positive. The time interval between initiating medication and the onset of the patient's rash was the longest and he also had the largest area of skin affected compared with patients with a similar condition in previous related reports. Remaining vigilant for possible adverse cutaneous hypersensitivity reactions during treatment is important because of the long-term course of pregabalin treatment for neuropathic pain.

A Clinico-Epidemiological Study of Cutaneous Adverse Drug Reactions in a Tertiary Care Centre of Eastern India.

Background: Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are major problems in the drug therapy. Cutaneous adverse drug reactions (CADRs) are the most common ADRs. The pattern of CADRs differs among various drugs. Aims: To record various morphological patterns of CADRs and their causal relationships among patients attending in a tertiary care centre. Materials and Methods: An observational, cross-sectional, clinical study was conducted for a duration of one and a half years in a tertiary care centre in eastern India. Patients presenting with suspected CADRs were included if drug identity could be ascertained. Clinical profiling and drug history were recorded, and causality assessment was carried out as per the Naranjo scale. Result: The commonest CADR in our study was fixed drug eruption (FDE) 48.61%, followed by SJS-TEN spectrum 16.66%, maculopapular rash 11.11% and so on. Severe cutaneous adverse drug reactions (SCARs) such as SJS, TEN, SJS-TEN Overlap, AGEP and DRESS accounted for 18 cases (25%). The most common culprit drugs were antimicrobials (54.16%), followed by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (15.27%) and anticonvulsants (12.5%). Most of the CADRs were in probable category. Conclusion: The pattern of CADRs and the drugs causing them in our study population are similar to some previous studies but somewhat different from most of the previous Indian studies. The incidence of SCARs was significantly higher than in previous other studies in India and abroad.

Prostaglandin E-induced polycyclic cutaneous eruption with geometric features.

Prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) is a substance produced by the patent ductus arteriosus that keeps it open. PGE1 can be a lifesaving drug for infants born with ductus-dependent congenital heart disease (CHD) where there is a block of blood flow to the lungs or transposition of great arteries. We present a case of a 36-week, 2-day gestation neonate with CHD who developed bright erythematous annular and polycyclic patches on day 2 of PGE1 administration. When PGE1 dosing was decreased, the rash resolved on its own. Our case demonstrates that PGE1 treatment may not need to be interrupted.

HLA-B*57:01-dependent intracellular stress in keratinocytes triggers dermal hypersensitivity reactions to abacavir.

Specific human leukocyte antigen (HLA) polymorphisms combined with certain drug administration strongly correlate with skin eruption. Abacavir hypersensitivity (AHS), which is strongly associated with HLA-B*57:01, is one of the most representative examples. Conventionally, HLA transmits immunological signals via interactions with T cell receptors on the cell surface. This study focused on HLA-mediated intracellular reactions in keratinocytes that might determine the onset of skin immunotoxicity by drug treatments. Abacavir exposure resulted in keratinocytes expressing HLA-B*57:01 exhibiting endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress responses, such as immediate calcium release into the cytosol and enhanced HSP70 expression. In contrast, keratinocytes expressing HLA-B*57:03 (closely related to HLA-B*57:01) did not show these changes. This indicated that HLA-B*57:01 has a specific intracellular response to abacavir in keratinocytes in the absence of lymphocytes. Furthermore, abacavir exposure in HLA-B*57:01-expressing keratinocytes elevated the expression of cytokines/chemokines such as interferon-γ, interleukin-1ß, and CCL27, and induced T lymphoblast migration. These effects were suppressed by ER stress relief using 4-phenylbutyrate (4-PB). HLA-B*57:01-transgenic mice also exhibited ER stress in epidermal areas following abacavir administration, and abacavir-induced skin toxicity was attenuated by the administration of 4-PB. Moreover, abacavir bound to HLA-B*57:01 within cells and its exposure led to HLA-B*57:01 protein aggregation and interaction with molecular chaperones in the ER of keratinocytes. Our results underscore the importance of HLA-mediated intracellular stress responses in understanding the onset of HLA-B*57:01-mediated AHS. We provide the possibility that the intracellular behavior of HLA is crucial for determining the onset of drug eruptions.