BMAL1 Regulates Glucokinase Expression Through E-Box Elements In Vitro.

The organization of a circadian system includes an endogenous pacemaker system, input pathways for environmental synchronizing (entraining) stimuli, and output pathways through which the clock regulates physiological and behavioral processes, for example, the glucose-sensing mechanism in the liver. The liver is the central regulator of metabolism and one of our peripherals clocks. In mammals, central to this pacemaker are the transcription factors Circadian Locomotor Output Cycles Kaput (CLOCK) and BMAL1 (Brain and Muscle ARNT-Like 1). BMAL1 dimerizes with CLOCK, and this heterodimer then binds to the E-box promoter elements (CACGTG) present in clock and clock-controlled genes (CCGs). However, we are just beginning to understand how output pathways and regulatory mechanisms of CCGs are involved in rhythmic physiological processes. Glucokinase (GCK) is a fundamental enzyme in glucose homeostasis, catalyzing the high Km phosphorylation of glucose and allowing its storage. Moreover, gck is a dependent circadian gene. This study aims to determine the contribution of clock genes to hepatic gck expression and to define the specific role of E-box sequences on the circadian regulation of hepatic gck. Results showed that gck expression follows a circadian rhythm in rat hepatocytes in vitro. Accordingly, bmal1 expression induces the glucokinase circadian rhythmic expression in hepatocytes and the analysis of human and rat gck promoters, indicating the presence of E-box regions. Moreover, the basal activity of gck promoter was increased by clock/bmal1 co-transfection but inhibited by Period1/Period2 (per1/per2) co-transfection. Thus, the data suggest that the clock proteins tightly regulate the transcriptional activity of the gck promoter.

ZEB1-activated Notch1 promotes circulating tumor cell migration and invasion in lung squamous cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC) is recognized as the major subtypes of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are critical players in tumor metastasis. A molecular profiling of CTCs has previously identified notch receptor 1 (Notch1) as an important mediator in NSCLC. Therefore, we investigate Notch1 roles in LUSC and its related mechanisms. METHODS: The serum levels of Notch1 were measured by reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR). The CTCs isolated from blood samples were characterized via an immunofluorescence method. Cell motion was determined using Transwell chambers. The regulatory relationship between Notch1 and zinc finger E-box-binding homeobox 1 (ZEB1) was verified by chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) and luciferase reporter assays. The protein levels were detected by western blotting. RESULTS: Higher Notch1 expression in patients with LUSC than that in normal controls was observed. Notch1 knockdown inhibited cell motion and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT). ZEB1 transcriptionally activated Notch1. ZEB1 upregulation exacerbated the malignant phenotypes of CTCs. CONCLUSION: ZEB1-activated Notch1 promotes malignant phenotypes of CTCs in LUSC and indicates poor prognosis.

SPARC Induces E-Cadherin Repression and Enhances Cell Migration through Integrin αvß3 and the Transcription Factor ZEB1 in Prostate Cancer Cells.

Secreted protein acidic and rich in cysteine (SPARC), or osteonectin, is a matricellular protein that modulates interactions between cells and their microenvironment. SPARC is expressed during extracellular matrix remodeling and is abundant in bone marrow and high-grade prostate cancer (PCa). In PCa, SPARC induces changes associated with epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), enhancing migration and invasion and increasing the expression of EMT transcriptional factor Zinc finger E-box-binding homeobox 1 (ZEB1), but not Zinc finger protein SNAI1 (Snail) or Zinc finger protein SNAI2 (Slug). It is unknown whether the SPARC-induced downregulation of E-cadherin in PCa cells depends on ZEB1. Several integrins are mediators of SPARC effects in cancer cells. Because integrin signaling can induce EMT programs, we hypothesize that SPARC induces E-cadherin repression through the activation of integrins and ZEB1. Through stable knockdown and the overexpression of SPARC in PCa cells, we demonstrate that SPARC downregulates E-cadherin and increases vimentin, ZEB1, and integrin ß3 expression. Knocking down SPARC in PCa cells decreases the tyrosine-925 phosphorylation of FAK and impairs focal adhesion formation. Blocking integrin αvß3 and silencing ZEB1 revert both the SPARC-induced downregulation of E-cadherin and cell migration enhancement. We conclude that SPARC induces E-cadherin repression and enhances PCa cell migration through the integrin αvß3/ZEB1 signaling pathway.

Reciprocal Relationship Between Calcium Signaling and Circadian Clocks: Implications for Calcium Homeostasis, Clock Function, and Therapeutics.

In animals, circadian clocks impose a daily rhythmicity to many behaviors and physiological processes. At the molecular level, circadian rhythms are driven by intracellular transcriptional/translational feedback loops (TTFL). Interestingly, emerging evidence indicates that they can also be modulated by multiple signaling pathways. Among these, Ca2+ signaling plays a key role in regulating the molecular rhythms of clock genes and of the resulting circadian behavior. In addition, the application of in vivo imaging approaches has revealed that Ca2+ is fundamental to the synchronization of the neuronal networks that make up circadian pacemakers. Conversely, the activity of circadian clocks may influence Ca2+ signaling. For instance, several genes that encode Ca2+ channels and Ca2+-binding proteins display a rhythmic expression, and a disruption of this cycling affects circadian function, underscoring their reciprocal relationship. Here, we review recent advances in our understanding of how Ca2+ signaling both modulates and is modulated by circadian clocks, focusing on the regulatory mechanisms described in Drosophila and mice. In particular, we examine findings related to the oscillations in intracellular Ca2+ levels in circadian pacemakers and how they are regulated by canonical clock genes, neuropeptides, and light stimuli. In addition, we discuss how Ca2+ rhythms and their associated signaling pathways modulate clock gene expression at the transcriptional and post-translational levels. We also review evidence based on transcriptomic analyzes that suggests that mammalian Ca2+ channels and transporters (e.g., ryanodine receptor, ip3r, serca, L- and T-type Ca2+ channels) as well as Ca2+-binding proteins (e.g., camk, cask, and calcineurin) show rhythmic expression in the central brain clock and in peripheral tissues such as the heart and skeletal muscles. Finally, we discuss how the discovery that Ca2+ signaling is regulated by the circadian clock could influence the efficacy of pharmacotherapy and the outcomes of clinical interventions.

Knockdown of ZEB1 reverses cancer stem cell properties in prostate cancer cells.

Prostate cancer (PCa) is the second most diagnosed type of cancer in men worldwide. Advanced PCa is resistant to conventional therapies and high recurrence has been associated with high rates of metastasis. Cancer stem cells (CSCs) have been proposed to be responsible for this, due to their ability of self­renewal and differentiation into other cell types. Zinc finger E­box­binding homeobox 1 (ZEB1), a transcription factor involved in the regulation of epithelial­mesenchymal transition (EMT), has been associated with the activation of several mechanisms that lead to resistance to treatment. As recent evidence has shown that CSCs may originate from non­CSCs during EMT, it was hypothesized that knocking down ZEB1 expression in PCa cell lines could revert some properties associated with CSCs. Using lentiviraltransduction, ZEB1 expression was silenced in the PCa DU145 and LNCaP cell lines. The mRNA and protein expression levels of key canonical CSC markers (Krüppel­like factor 4, SOX2, CD44 and CD133) were determined using reverse transcription­-quantitative PCR and western blot analysis, respectively. In addition, the colony forming ability of the ZEB1­knockdown cells was evaluated, and the type of colonies formed (holoclones, paraclones and meroclones) was also characterized. Finally, the ability to form prostatospheres was evaluated in vitro. It was found that in ZEB1­knockdown DU145 cells, the expression levels of CSC phenotype markers (CD44, CD133 and SOX2) were decreased compared with those in the control group. Furthermore, ZEB1­knockdown cells exhibited a lower ability to form prostatospheres and to generate colonies. In conclusion, stable silencing of ZEB1 reversed CSC properties in PCa cell lines. Since ZEB1 is associated with malignancy, therapy resistance and a CSC phenotype in PCa cell lines, targeting ZEB1 may be a key factor to eradicate CSCs and improve the prognosis of patients with advanced PCa.

Expression Profiling Identifies TWIST2 Target Genes in Setleis Syndrome Patient Fibroblast and Lymphoblast Cells.

Background: Setleis syndrome (SS) is a focal facial dermal dysplasia presenting with bilateral temporal skin lesions, eyelash abnormalities and absent meibomian glands. SS is a rare autosomal recessive disorder caused by mutations in the TWIST2 gene, which codes for a transcription factor of the bHLH family known to be involved in skin and facial development. Methods: We obtained gene expression profiles by microarray analyses from control and SS patient primary skin fibroblast and lymphoblastoid cell lines. Results: Out of 983 differentially regulated genes in fibroblasts (fold change ≥ 2.0), 479 were down-regulated and 509 were up-regulated, while in lymphoblasts, 1248 genes were down-regulated and 73 up-regulated. RT-PCR reactions confirmed altered expression of selected genes. Conclusions: TWIST2 is described as a repressor, but expression profiling suggests an important role in gene activation as well, as evidenced by the number of genes that are down-regulated, with a much higher proportion of down-regulated genes found in lymphoblastoid cells from an SS patient. As expected, both types of cell types showed dysregulation of cytokine genes. These results identify potential TWIST2 target genes in two important cell types relevant to rare disorders caused by mutations in this bHLH gene.

CRTAM is negatively regulated by ZEB1 in T cells.

T cell activation leads to the induction of genes that are required for appropriate immune responses. This includes CRTAM (Class-I MHC-restricted T cell associated molecule), a protein that plays a key role in T cell development, proliferation, and generating cell polarity during activation. We previously characterized the CRTAM promoter and described how AP-1 family members are important for inducing CRTAM expression upon antigenic activation. Here, we show that CRTAM is a molecular target for ZEB1 (zinc finger E-box-binding protein), a homeodomain/Zn finger transcription factor. Overexpression of ZEB1 repressed CRTAM promoter activity, as well as endogenous CRTAM levels in human T cells. ZEB1-mediated transcriptional repression was abolished when E-box-like elements in the CRTAM promoter are mutated. In summary, ZEB1 functions as a transcriptional repressor for the CRTAM gene in both non-stimulated and stimulated T cells, thereby modulating adaptive immune responses.