Strategies to determine positive anti-SARS-CoV-2 memory T lymphocyte response during the evolution of an epidemic.

During SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, the assessment of immune protection of people at risk of severe infection was an important goal. The appearance of VOCs (Variant of Concern) highlighted the limits of evaluating immune protection through the humoral response. While the humoral response partly loses its neutralizing activity, the anti-SARS-CoV-2 memory T cell response strongly cross protects against VOCs becoming an indispensable tool to assess immune protection. We compared two techniques available in laboratory to evaluate anti-SARS-CoV-2 memory T cell response in a cohort of infected or vaccinated patients with different levels of risk to develop a severe disease: the ELISpot assay and the T-Cell Lymphocyte Proliferation Assay respectively exploring IFNγ production and cell proliferation. We showed that the ELISpot assay detected more anti-Spike memory T cell response than the Lymphocyte Proliferation Assay. We next observed that the use of two different suppliers as antigenic source in the ELISpot assay did not affect the detection of anti-Spike memory T cell response. Finally, we explored a new approach for defining the positivity threshold, using unsupervised mixed Gaussian modeling, challenging the traditional ROC curve used by the supplier. That will be helpful in endemic situation where it could be difficult to recruit "negative" patients.

SARS-CoV-2-specific T cell responses: a comparative analysis between QuantiFERON SARS-CoV-2, T-SPOT.COVID, and an in-house Omicron ELISpot.

BACKGROUND: T cell immunity plays a pivotal role in mitigating the severity of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Therefore, reliable functional T cell assays are required to evaluate severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)-specific T cell immunity in specific patient populations. METHODS: We recruited a cohort of 23 healthcare workers who received their bivalent Omicron BA.1 / ancestral mRNA booster vaccination or were infected with the Omicron variant at a median of 144 days and 227 days before blood collection, respectively. In this cohort, we compared the performances of two widely utilized commercial SARS-CoV-2 interferon-gamma release assays (IGRAs), i.e., QuantiFERON SARS-CoV-2 and T-SPOT.COVID, and an in-house designed Omicron enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISpot). RESULTS: The QuantiFERON SARS-CoV-2 and T-SPOT.COVID assays detected SARS-CoV-2 spike-specific T cells in 34.8 % and 21.7 % of participants, respectively. Moreover, our in-house designed ELISpot that included Omicron BA.4 and BA.5 full-spike peptides detected T cell responses in 47.8 % of participants and was strongly associated with the T-SPOT.COVID. CONCLUSION: The evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 T cell immunity using commercially accessible assays may yield disparate outcomes as results from different assays are not directly comparable. A specific Omicron ELISpot should be considered to assess Omicron-specific T cell immunity.

Multiparametric analysis of the specific immune response against SARS-CoV-2.

BACKGROUND: SARS-CoV-2, which causes COVID-19, has killed more than 7 million people worldwide. Understanding the development of postinfectious and postvaccination immune responses is necessary for effective treatment and the introduction of appropriate antipandemic measures. OBJECTIVES: We analysed humoral and cell-mediated anti-SARS-CoV-2 immune responses to spike (S), nucleocapsid (N), membrane (M), and open reading frame (O) proteins in individuals collected up to 1.5 years after COVID-19 onset and evaluated immune memory. METHODS: Peripheral blood mononuclear cells and serum were collected from patients after COVID-19. Sampling was performed in two rounds: 3-6 months after infection and after another year. Most of the patients were vaccinated between samplings. SARS-CoV-2-seronegative donors served as controls. ELISpot assays were used to detect SARS-CoV-2-specific T and B cells using peptide pools (S, NMO) or recombinant proteins (rS, rN), respectively. A CEF peptide pool consisting of selected viral epitopes was applied to assess the antiviral T-cell response. SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies were detected via ELISA and a surrogate virus neutralisation assay. RESULTS: We confirmed that SARS-CoV-2 infection induces the establishment of long-term memory IgG+ B cells and memory T cells. We also found that vaccination enhanced the levels of anti-S memory B and T cells. Multivariate comparison also revealed the benefit of repeated vaccination. Interestingly, the T-cell response to CEF was lower in patients than in controls. CONCLUSION: This study supports the importance of repeated vaccination for enhancing immunity and suggests a possible long-term perturbation of the overall antiviral immune response caused by SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Epitope mapping and a candidate vaccine design from canine distemper virus.

Background: Canine distemper (CD) is a worldwide spread disease that has been described in 12 families of mammals, especially in the Carnivora order, being better studied in domestic canines where vaccination represents the best means of control. CD is controlled by vaccination, but many cases of the disease still occur in vaccinated animals. Aim: The aim of this work was to study antigen-specific epitopes that can subsidize the development of a new vaccine approach. Methods: Mapping of T cell reactive epitopes for CD virus (CDV) was carried out through enzyme-linked immunospot assays using 119 overlapped synthetic peptides from the viral hemagglutinin protein, grouped in 22 pools forming a matrix to test the immune response of 32 animals. Results: Evaluations using the criteria established to identify reactive pools, demonstrated that 26 animals presented at least one reactive pool, that one pool was not reactive to any animal, and six pools were the most frequent among the reactive peptides. The crisscrossing of the most reactive pools in the matrix revealed nine peptides considered potential candidate epitopes for T cell stimulation against the CDV and those were used to design an in-silico protein, containing also predicted epitopes for B cell stimulation, and further analyzed using immune epitope databases to ensure protein quality and stability. Conclusion: The final in silico optimized protein presents characteristics that qualify it to be used to develop a new prototype epitope-based anti-CDV vaccine.

Virus-specific antibody secreting cells reside in the peritoneal cavity and systemic immune sites of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) challenged intraperitoneally with salmonid alphavirus.

The development and persistence of antibody secreting cells (ASC) after antigenic challenge remain inadequately understood in teleosts. In this study, intraperitoneal (ip) injection of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) with salmonid alphavirus (WtSAV3) increased the total ASC response, peaking 3-6 weeks post injection (wpi) locally in the peritoneal cavity (PerC) and in systemic lymphoid tissues, while at 13 wpi the response was only elevated in PerC. At the same time point a specific ASC response was induced by WtSAV3 in PerC and systemic tissues, with the highest frequency in PerC, suggesting a local role. Inactivated SAV (InSAV1) induced comparatively lower ASC responses in all sites, and specific serum antibodies were only induced by WtSAV3 and not by InSAV1. An InSAV1 boost did not increase these responses. Expression of immune marker genes implies a role for PerC adipose tissue in the PerC immune response. Overall, the study suggests the Atlantic salmon PerC as a secondary immune site and an ASC survival niche.

In-vivo and ex-vivo tests for culprit drugs identification in severe cutaneous adverse drugs reactions.

Drug causality assessment in severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs) remains challenging. We investigated the usefulness of in-vivo drug patch tests (PT), ex-vivo interferon (IFN)-γ enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISpot) assay, and lymphocyte transformation test (LTT) in 30 SCARs patients within the past 36 months. Drug PT yielded a 20% positivity rate (n = 6), while IFN-γ ELISpot and LTT showed positive rates of 56.67% (n = 17) and 41.38% (n = 12), respectively. Combining the three tests resulted in an overall positive rate of 66.67% (n = 20) of cases. IFN-γ ELISpot offered additional positivity, especially with oxypurinol. Employing a combined diagnostic approach may enhance the chances of obtaining a positive result.

Detection of virus-specific T cells via ELISpot corroborates early diagnosis in human Borna disease virus 1 (BoDV-1) encephalitis.

BACKGROUND: Within endemic regions in southern and eastern Germany, Borna disease virus 1 (BoDV-1) causes rare zoonotic spill-over infections in humans, leading to encephalitis with a high case-fatality risk. So far, intra-vitam diagnosis has mainly been based on RT-qPCR from cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and serology, both being associated with diagnostic challenges. Whilst low RNA copy numbers in CSF limit the sensitivity of RT-qPCR from this material, seroconversion often occurs late during the course of the disease. CASE PRESENTATION: Here, we report the new case of a 40 - 50 year-old patient in whom the detection of virus-specific T cells via ELISpot corroborated the diagnosis of BoDV-1 infection. The patient showed a typical course of the disease with prodromal symptoms like fever and headaches 2.5 weeks prior to hospital admission, required mechanical ventilation from day three after hospitalisation and remained in deep coma until death ten days after admission. RESULTS: Infection was first detected by positive RT-qPCR from a CSF sample drawn four days after admission (viral load 890 copies/mL). A positive ELISpot result was obtained from peripheral blood collected on day seven, when virus-specific IgG antibodies were not detectable in serum, possibly due to previous immune adsorption for suspected autoimmune-mediated encephalitis. CONCLUSION: This case demonstrates that BoDV-1 ELISpot serves as additional diagnostic tool even in the first week after hospitalisation of patients with BoDV-1 encephalitis.

Evaluation of T Cell Response to SARS-CoV-2 in Kidney Transplant Recipients Receiving Monoclonal Antibody Prophylaxis and the Utility of a Bivalent mRNA Vaccine Booster Dose.

Monoclonal antibodies have been administered to kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) with a poor or non-responder status to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. The cellular response to SARS-CoV-2 has been poorly studied in this context. We assessed the T cell response to SARS-CoV-2 in 97 patients on the day of the injection of tixagevimab/cilgavimab using an IFNγ enzyme-linked immunospot assay (ELISPOT). Among the 97 patients, 34 (35%) developed COVID-19 before the injection. Twenty-nine (85.3%) had an ELISPOT compatible with a SARS-CoV-2 infection. There was no difference between KTRs under belatacept or tacrolimus treatment. Sixty-three patients (64.9%) had no known COVID-19 prior to the ELISPOT, but nine (14.3%) had a positive ELISPOT. In 21 KTRs with a positive ELISPOT who received a booster dose of a bivalent mRNA vaccine, median antibody titers and spike-reactive T cells increased significantly in patients under tacrolimus but not belatacept. Our study emphasizes the potential usefulness of the exploration of immune cellular response to SARS-CoV-2 by ELISPOT. In KTRs with a positive ELISPOT and under CNI therapy, a booster dose of mRNA vaccine seems effective in inducing an immune response to SARS-CoV-2.

SARS-CoV-2 cellular and humoral responses in vaccine-naive individuals during the first two waves of COVID-19 infections in the southern region of The Netherlands: a cross-sectional population-based study.

With the emergence of highly transmissible variants of concern, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) still poses a global threat of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) resurgence. Cellular responses to novel variants are more robustly maintained than humoral responses, and therefore, cellular responses are of interest in assessing immune protection against severe disease in the population. We aimed to assess cellular responses to SARS-CoV-2 at the population level. IFNγ (interferon γ) responses to wild-type SARS-CoV-2 were analyzed using an ELISpot assay in vaccine-naive individuals with different humoral responses: Ig (IgM and/or IgG) seronegative (n = 90) and seropositive (n = 181) with low (<300 U/mL) or high (≥300 U/mL) humoral responses to the spike receptor binding domain (anti-S-RBD). Among the seropositive participants, 71.3% (129/181) were IFNγ ELISpot positive, compared to 15.6% (14/90) among the seronegative participants. Common COVID-19 symptoms such as fever and ageusia were associated with IFNγ ELISpot positivity in seropositive participants, whereas no participant characteristics were associated with IFNγ ELISpot positivity in seronegative participants. Fever and/or dyspnea and anti-S-RBD levels were associated with higher IFNγ responses. Symptoms of more severe disease and higher anti-S-RBD responses were associated with higher IFNγ responses. A significant proportion (15.6%) of seronegative participants had a positive IFNγ ELISpot. Assessment of cellular responses may improve estimates of the immune response to SARS-CoV-2 in the general population. IMPORTANCE: Data on adaptive cellular immunity are of interest to define immune protection against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 in a population, which is important for decision-making on booster-vaccination strategies. This study provides data on associations between participant characteristics and cellular immune responses in vaccine-naive individuals with different humoral responses.

Assessing Antigen-Specific T Cell Responses Through IFN-γ Enzyme-Linked Immune Absorbent Spot (ELISpot).

T cells are instrumental in protecting the host against invading pathogens and the development of cancer. To do so, they produce effector molecules such as granzymes, interleukins, interferons, and perforin. For the development and immunomonitoring of therapeutic applications such as cell-based therapies and vaccines, assessing T cell effector function is paramount. This can be achieved through various methods, such as 51Cr release assays, flow cytometry, and enzyme-linked immune absorbent spot (ELISpot) assays. For T cell ELISpots, plates are coated with antibodies directed against the effector molecule of interest (e.g., IFN-g). Subsequently, peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) or isolated T cells are cultured on the plate together with stimuli of choice, and the production of effector molecules is visualized via labeled detection antibodies. For clinical studies, ELISpot is currently the gold standard to determine antigen-specific T cell frequencies. In contrast to 51Cr release assays, ELISpot allows for the exact enumeration of responding T cells, and compared to flow cytometry, ELISpot is more cost-effective and high throughput. Here, we optimize and describe, in a step-by-step fashion, how to perform a controlled IFN-γ ELISpot experiment to determine the frequency of responding or antigen-specific T cells in healthy human volunteers. Of note, this protocol can also be employed to assess the frequency of antigen-specific T cells induced in, e.g., vaccination studies or present in cellular products.

Lymphocyte Function at Baseline Could Be a New Predictor of Tumor Burden following Six Cycles of Radium-223 Therapy in Patients with Metastasized, Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.

Previous data indicate that one cycle of treatment with radium-223 (223Ra) did not significantly impair lymphocyte function in patients with metastasized, castration-resistant prostate cancer. The aim of the current study was to assess in 21 patients whether six cycles of this therapy had an effect on lymphocyte proliferation and interferon-γ and interleukin (IL)-10 ELISpot results. Lymphocyte proliferation after stimulation with microbial antigens and the production of interferon-γ continuously decreased after six cycles of radionuclide therapy, reaching statistical significance (p < 0.05) at months 1, 2, 4, and/or 6 after therapy. One month after the last cycle of therapy, 67% of patients showed a decrease in tumor burden. The tumor burden correlated negatively with IL-10 secretion at baseline, e.g., after stimulation with tetanus antigen (p < 0.0001, r = -0.82). As determined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, tetanus-specific IL-10 spots at baseline had the highest predictive value (p = 0.005) for tumor burden at month 6, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.90 (sensitivity 100%, specificity 78%). In conclusion, we observed an additive effect of treatment with 223Ra on immune function and found that IL-10 secretion at baseline predicted tumor burden at month 6 after treatment.

Routine evaluation of HBV-specific T cell reactivity in chronic hepatitis B using a broad-spectrum T-cell epitope peptide library and ELISpot assay.

BACKGROUND: The clinical routine test of HBV-specific T cell reactivity is still limited due to the high polymorphisms of human leukocyte antigens (HLA) in patient cohort and the lack of universal detection kit, thus the clinical implication remains disputed. METHODS: A broad-spectrum peptide library, which consists of 103 functionally validated CD8+ T-cell epitopes spanning overall HBsAg, HBeAg, HBx and HBpol proteins and fits to the HLA polymorphisms of Chinese and Northeast Asian populations, was grouped into eight peptide pools and was used to establish an ELISpot assay for enumerating the reactive HBV-specific T cells in PBMCs. Totally 294 HBV-infected patients including 203 ones with chronic hepatitis B (CHB), 13 ones in acute resolved stage (R), 52 ones with liver cirrhosis (LC) and 26 ones with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) were detected, and 33 CHB patients were longitudinally monitored for 3 times with an interval of 3-5 months. RESULTS: The numbers of reactive HBV-specific T cells were significantly correlated with ALT level, HBsAg level, and disease stage (R, CHB, LC and HCC), and R patients displayed the strongest HBV-specific T cell reactivity while CHB patients showed the weakest one. For 203 CHB patients, the numbers of reactive HBV-specific T cells presented a significantly declined trend when the serum viral DNA load, HBsAg, HBeAg or ALT level gradually increased, but only a very low negative correlation coefficient was defined (r = - 0.21, - 0.21, - 0.27, - 0.079, respectively). Different Nucleotide Analogs (NUCs) did not bring difference on HBV-specific T cell reactivity in the same duration of treatment. NUCs/pegIFN-α combination led to much more reactive HBV-specific T cells than NUCs monotherapy. The dynamic numbers of reactive HBV-specific T cells were obviously increasing in most CHB patients undergoing routine treatment, and the longitudinal trend possess a high predictive power for the hepatitis progression 6 or 12 months later. CONCLUSION: The presented method could be developed into an efficient reference method for the clinical evaluation of cellular immunity. The CHB patients presenting low reactivity of HBV-specific T cells have a worse prognosis for hepatitis progression and should be treated using pegIFN-α to improve host T-cell immunity.

Important Considerations for ELISpot Validation.

The ELISpot assay has a solid place in the immune monitoring field for over 40 years. It is an assay that can assess the function of single immune cells in a straightforward and easy-to-learn approach. Its use in basic research, translational, and clinical work has been documented in countless publications. Harmonization guidelines and invaluable tools for optimal assay performance and evaluation exist. However, the validation of an established ELISpot protocol has been left to diverse opinions about how to interpret and tackle typical validation parameters. This chapter addresses important considerations for ELISpot validation, including the interpretations of validation parameters for a meaningful description of assay performance.

Comparing Flow Cytometry and ELISpot for Detection of IL-10, IL-6, and TNF Alpha on Human PBMCs.

ELISpot and flow cytometry are two methods often utilized side-by-side for detecting secreted and intracellular cytokines, respectively. Each application has its own advantages and challenges. ELISpot is more sensitive compared to ELISA and appears to be more consistent in detecting IL-10 production than flow cytometry. ELISpot can be used for detecting the secretion of multiple cytokines but not from the same cells simultaneously, whereas flow cytometry allows for the concurrent detection of multiple intracellular cytokines by the same cells. Flow cytometry is a convenient technique allowing for the detection of many cytokines at the same time in a population of cells. The restimulation cocktails used for cytokine detection in flow cytometry are hard on cells and lead to decreased cell viability. Using a live dead dye allows for the exclusion of dead cells when analyzing data. We illustrated the differences between ELISpot and flow cytometry by stimulating cells with two toll-like receptor (TLR) agonists, LPS or Pam3CSK4. Both activators increase production of various cytokines, including IL-10, IL-6, and TNF-alpha. The TLR2 antagonist, MMG-11, was used to inhibit this increased cytokine production. We observed some inhibition of IL-6 and IL-10 from Pam3CSK4 stimulation in the presence of MMG-11 by flow cytometry. TNF-α remains largely unchanged as its basal expression is high, but there is some reduction in the presence of MMG-11 for both methods. However, IL-10 was difficult to detect by ELISpot given the low seeding density. Overall, both ELISpot and flow cytometry are good methods for detecting secreted and intracellular cytokines, respectively, and should be used as complimentary assays.

Reagent Tracker™ Platform Verifies and Provides Audit Trails for the Error-Free Implementation of T-Cell ImmunoSpot® Assays.

ELISPOT and FluoroSpot assays, collectively called ImmunoSpot assays, permit to reliable detection of rare antigen-specific T cells in freshly isolated cell material, such as peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC). Establishing their frequency within all PBMC permits to assess the magnitude of antigen-specific T-cell immunity; the simultaneous measurement of their cytokine signatures reveals these T-cells' lineage and effector functions, that is, the quality of T-cell-mediated immunity. Because of their unparalleled sensitivity, ease of implementation, robustness, and frugality in PBMC utilization, T-cell ImmunoSpot assays are increasingly becoming part of the standard immune monitoring repertoire. For regulated workflows, stringent audit trails of the data generated are a requirement. While this has been fully accomplished for the analysis of T-cell ImmunoSpot assay results, such are missing for the wet laboratory implementation of the actual test performed. Here we introduce a solution for enhancing and verifying the error-free implementation of T-cell ImmunoSpot assays.

Detection of SARS-CoV-2-Specific Cells Utilizing Whole Proteins and/or Peptides in Human PBMCs Using IFN-Æ´ ELISPOT Assay.

SARS-CoV-2 continues to threaten global public health, making COVID-19 immunity studies of utmost importance. Waning of antibody responses postinfection and/or vaccination and the emergence of immune escape variants have been ongoing challenges in mitigating SARS-CoV-2 morbidity and mortality. While a tremendous amount of work has been done to characterize humoral immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 virus and vaccines, cellular immunity, mediated by T cells, is critical for efficient viral control and protection and demonstrates high durability and cross-reactivity to coronavirus variants. Thus, ELISPOT, a standard assay for antigen-specific cellular immune response assessment, allows us to evaluate SARS-CoV-2-specific T-cell response by quantifying the frequency of SARS-CoV-2-specific cytokine-secreting cells in vitro. We have outlined a detailed procedure to study T-cell recall responses to SARS-CoV-2 in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) following infection and/or vaccination using an optimized IFN-γ ELISPOT assay. Our methodologies can be adapted to assess other cytokines and are a useful tool for studying other viral pathogen and/or peptide-specific T-cell responses.

The Applications of ELISpot in the Identification and Treatment of Various Forms of Tuberculosis and in the Cancer Immunotherapies.

ELISpot (enzyme-linked immunospot) is a powerful immunological tool for the detection of cytokine-secreting cells at a single-cell resolution. It is widely used for the diagnosis of various infectious diseases, e.g., tuberculosis and sarcoidosis, and it is also widely used in cancer immunotherapy research. Its ability to distinguish between active and latent forms of tuberculosis makes it an extremely powerful tool for epidemiological studies and contact tracing. In addition to that, it is a very useful tool for the research and development of cancer immunotherapies. ELISpot can be employed to assess the immune responses against various tumor-associated antigens, which could provide valuable insights for the development of effective therapies against cancers. Furthermore, it plays a crucial role to the evaluation of immune responses against specific antigens that not only could aid in vaccine development but also assist in treatment monitoring and development of therapeutic and diagnostic strategies. This chapter briefly describes some of the applications of ELISpot in tuberculosis and cancer research.

Frequencies of SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein-Specific Memory B Cells in Human PBMCs, Quantified by ELISPOT Assay.

Vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 with coronavirus vaccines that elicit protective immune responses is critical to the prevention of severe disease and mortality associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Understanding the adaptive immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 infection and/or vaccination will continue to aid in the development of next-generation vaccines. Studies have shown the important role of SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies for both disease resolution and prevention of COVID-19 serious sequelae following vaccination. However, antibody responses are short-lived, highlighting the importance of studying antigen-specific B-cell responses to better understand durable immunity and immunologic memory. Since the spike protein is the main target of antibody-producing B cells, we developed a SARS-CoV-2 memory B cell ELISPOT assay to measure the frequencies of spike-specific B cells after COVID-19 infection and/or vaccination. Here, we describe in detail the methodology for using this ELISPOT assay to quantify SARS-CoV-2 spike-specific memory B cells produced by infection and/or vaccination in human PBMC samples. Application of this assay may help better understand and predict SARS-CoV-2 recall immune responses and to develop potential B cell correlates of protection at the methodological level.