ABSTRACT
Objective@#Application of Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute evaluation protocols-12 approved guideline 2nd edition (CLSI EP12-A2) and EP15-A2 documents in the performance evaluation of Adenovirus IgM CLIA microparticles.@*Methods@#Referring to the EP15-A2 method , three samples of high and low concentration were selected. Each sample test was repeated 4 times one day for 5 days, and the total imprecision was calculated. Referring to the EP12-A2 method , samples of C50, C50-20% and C50+ 20% were prepared and repeated 40 times, to verify C50±20% bounds the C5~C95 interval. Compared with diagnostic accuracy criteria, the sensitivity and specificity were calculated. Compared with ELISA method , the concordance rate and Kappa value were calculated.@*Results@#The total imprecision CV (%) was less than 8%, lower than that announced by manufacturer. C50±20% concentration fall outside the C5~C95 interval. Compared with diagnostic accuracy criteria, the sensitivity was 100% (95%CI: 79.6%~100%), specificity was 97.8% (95%CI: 94.5%~99.1%), Kappa value was 0.871. Compared with ELISA method , the positive concordance rate was 66.7%(95%CI: 53.6%~77.7%), negative concordance rate was 97.4%(95%CI: 95.4%~98.5%)total concordance rate was 93.9%(95%CI: 91.6%~95.6%), Kappa value was 0.678.@*Conclusions@#The performance of Adenovirus IgM CLIA microparticles can meet clinical requirements.
ABSTRACT
Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) is a crucial serum marker for the diagnosis of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. It is imperative to compare test results from different detection methods based on different principles. Four methods, chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay (CMIA), electrochemiluminescent immunoassay (ECLIA), enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and golden immunochromato-graphic assay (GICA) were applied to test the HBsAg level in 250 specimens. According to the EP12-A2 and EP15-A2 documents from Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI), the concentration at which repeated results are 50% positive (C50) of HBsAg detected by CMIA, ECLIA, ELISA and GICA was 0.05, 0.08, 0.15 and 15.0IU/ml, respectively. When the detection concentration of HBsAg was 0.5IU/ml, the imprecision degree of CMIA, ECLIA and ELISA was 8.1%, 5.9% and 14.9% respectively. When detecting high HBsAg level (≥20.0IU/ml) and HBsAg negative specimens, the consistency of the four methods was high, while for the low level (0.05-20.0IU/ml), the consistency was poor (except for the CMIA and ECLIA, P<0.05). When evaluation of the four methods in qualitative diagnosis of HBsAg level in the 116,455 specimens, there was no significant discrepancy among CMIA, CMIA and ECLIA, however, GICA was significantly different from the other 3 methods. Compared with CMIA, the false negative rate of ECLIA, ELISA and GICA was 0.2%, 1.3% and 12.3% respectively. In conclusion, GICA was only suitable for the preliminary screening of HBsAg positive individuals and ELISA can be applied to the qualitative diagnosis of HBsAg. Both CMIA and ECLIA were suitable for the quantitative determination of HBsAg.