Substratifying the risk of covert malignancy in significant rectal polyps: Outcomes from a specialist multidisciplinary team (MDT).

AIM: A treatment strategy for patients with a significant polyp or early colon cancer (SPECC) of the rectum presents a challenge due to the significant rate of covert malignancy and lack of standardized assessment. For this reason, NICE recommends multidisciplinary meetings to improve outcomes. The primary aim of the present study was to report the performance of our specialist early rectal cancer (SERC) multidisciplinary team (MDT) in correctly substratifying the risk of cancer and to discuss the limitations of staging investigations in those patients with "poor outcomes". METHOD: This was a retrospective review of patients referred to our SERC MDT from 2014 to 2019. Lesions were assigned by the MDT to three pre-resection categories (low, intermediate, high) according to the risk of covert malignancy. Resection method and final histology were compared to the pre-resection categories. RESULTS: Of 350 SPECC lesions, 174 were assessed as low-risk, 108 intermediate-risk and 68 high-risk. The cancer incidence was 4.8%, 8.3% and 53%, respectively (15.5% overall). Eight lesions were categorized as low-risk but following piecemeal resection were found to be malignant. Five lesions, three of which were categorized as high-risk, were ultimately benign following conventional surgery. One pT1sm1 cancer, removed by anterior resection, may have been treated by local excision. CONCLUSION: A total of 83% of malignant polyps were triaged to an en bloc resection technique and surgical resection avoided for nearly all benign lesions. However, 12 patients from this cohort were deemed to have a poor outcome because of miscategorization. Further comparative research is needed to establish the optimum strategy for rectal SPECC lesion assessment. ORIGINALITY STATEMENT: There is currently no consensus for staging significant polyps of the rectum. This paper reports the effectiveness of a specialist early rectal cancer MDT to correctly risk-stratify significant rectal polyps. It underscores the importance of accurate categorization for treatment decision-making, while acknowledging the limitations of current staging modalities.

Local Excision for organ preservation in early REctal cancer with No Adjuvant treatment (LORENA Trial): prospective observational study protocol.

INTRODUCTION: Local resection (LR) is an alternative to total mesorectal excision (TME) that avoids its associated morbidity to the detriment of oncological radicality in early stages of rectal cancer. There are several conditioning factors for the success of this strategy, such as poor prognosis histological factors (PPHF), involvement of resection margins, clinical under staging, or complications that may lead to the indication for radical surgery with TME. PATIENTS AND METHOD: An international multicenter prospective observational open-label study has been designed. Consecutive patients diagnosed with early rectal cancer (cT1N0 on MRI +/- endorectal ultrasound) whose lower limit is a maximum of 2 cm proximal to the ano-rectal junction will be included. The primary objective of the study is to determine the overall prevalence of PPHF after LR and requiring TME or postoperative radio-chemotherapy. DISCUSSION: The prevalence of PPHF conditioning the success of LR in early distal rectal cancer has been scarcely studied in the literature, and there are very few prospective data. Considering the increasing interest in the watch and wait strategy in rectal cancer and its possible application in early-stage tumors, it seems necessary to know this information. The results of this study will help guide clinical practice in patients with early distal rectal cancer. It will also provide quality information for the design of future comparative studies to improve organ preservation success in these patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05927584.

Oncological outcomes of local excision versus radical surgery for early rectal cancer in the context of staging and surveillance: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Local resection (LR) methods for rectal cancer are generally considered in the palliative setting or for patients deemed a high anaesthetic risk. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare oncological outcomes of LR and radical resection (RR) for early rectal cancer in the context of staging and surveillance assessment. METHODS: A literature search of MEDLINE, Embase and Emcare databases was performed for studies that reported data on clinical outcomes for both LR and RR for early rectal cancer from January 1995 to April 2023. Meta-analysis was performed using random-effect models and between-study heterogeneity was assessed. The quality of assessment was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for observational studies and the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool for randomised controlled trials. RESULTS: Twenty studies with 12,022 patients were included: 6,476 patients had LR and 5,546 patients underwent RR. RR led to an improvement in 5-year overall survival (OR 1.84; 95 % CI 1.54-2.20; p < 0.0001; I2 20 %) and local recurrence (OR 3.06; 95 % CI 2.02-4.64; p < 0.0001; I2 39 %) when compared to LR. However, when staging and surveillance methods were clearly adopted in LR cases, there was an improvement in R0 rates (96.7 % vs 85.6 %), 5-year disease-free survival (93.0 % vs 77.9 %) and overall survival (81.6 % vs 79.0 %) compared to when staging and surveillance was not reported/performed. CONCLUSIONS: LR may be appropriate for selected patients without poor prognostic factors in early rectal cancer. This study also highlights that there is currently no single standardised staging or surveillance approach being adopted in the management of early rectal cancer. A more specified and standardised preoperative staging for patient selection as well as clinical and image-based surveillance protocols is needed.

Radical versus Local Surgical Excision for Early Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: Radical excision (RE) for rectal cancer carries a higher risk of mortality and morbidity, while local excision (LE) could decrease these postoperative risks. However, the long-term benefit of LE is still debatable. Aim: To study the effectiveness of LE versus RE in T1 and T2 rectal cancer. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted using key databases like PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov. Only cohort studies and randomized controlled trials were included. RevMan 5.4 tool was used for data analysis. Both clinical and statistical heterogeneity of the studies were assessed, and I2 >75% was considered as highly heterogeneous. The primary outcomes being measured were 5-year overall survival (OS) and 5-year disease free survival (DFS). A subgroup analysis of patients with T1-only was also conducted, without adjuvant chemo/radiotherapy. Results: A total of 18 studies were included for final meta-analysis. Four were RCTs, while the other 15 were retrospective cohort studies. One included study had data from both RCT and non-RCT study groups. Nine studies were multicentered or national studies while nine were unicentral.There was no difference in risk ratio (RR) between OS: RR 0.95, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) [0.91, 0.99] and DFS: RR 0.93, 95% CI [0.87, 1.01]. There were lower hazards ratios in OS: RR 1.41, 95% CI [1.14, 1.74] and DFS: RR 1.95, 95% CI [1.36, 2.78] with radical, as compared to LE. Lower recurrence rate was associated with RE. Random effect model was used due to clinical heterogeneity between studies (different surgical procedures, tumor staging, adjuvant chemo or radiotherapy). Conclusions: LE for early-stage rectal cancer has lower 5-year OS and DFS than RE, with higher local recurrence rate. However, LE is associated with lower early postoperative mortality, morbidity and length of stay as compared to RE.

Early Rectal Cancer and Local Excision: A Narrative Review.

A rise in the incidence of early rectal cancer consequent to bowel-screening programs around the world and an increase in the incidence in young adults has led to a growing interest in organ-sparing treatment options. The rectum, being the most distal portion of the large intestine, is a fertile ground for local excision techniques performed with endoscopic or surgical techniques. Moreover, the advancement in endoscopic optical evaluation and the better definition of imaging techniques allow for a more precise local staging of early rectal cancer. Although the local treatment of early rectal cancer seems promising, in clinical practice, a significant number of patients who could benefit from local excision techniques undergo total mesorectal excision (TME) as the first approach. All relevant prospective clinical trials were identified through a computer-assisted search of the PubMed, EMBASE, and Medline databases until January 2024. This review is dedicated to endoscopic and surgical local excision in the treatment of early rectal cancer and highlights its possible role in current and future clinical practice, taking into account surgical completion techniques and chemoradiotherapy.

Comparing three-dimensional endorectal ultrasound and magnification chromoendoscopy for early rectal neoplasia invasion depth assessment.

INTRODUCTION: Accurate assessment of invasion depth of early rectal neoplasms is essential for optimal therapy. We aimed to compare three-dimensional endorectal ultrasound (3D-ERUS) with magnification chromoendoscopy (MCE) regarding their accuracy in assessing parietal invasion depth (T). METHODS: Patients with middle and distal rectum neoplasms were prospectively included. Two providers blinded to each other's assessment performed 3D-ERUS and MCE, respectively. The T stage assessed through ERUS was compared to the MCE evaluation. The results were compared to the surgical specimen anatomopathological report. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive (PPV), and negative (NPV) predictive values were calculated for the T stage and for the final therapy (local excision or radical surgery). RESULTS: In 8 years, 70 patients were enrolled, and all underwent both exams. MCE and ERUS showed an accuracy of 94.3% and 85.7%, sensitivity of 83.7 and 93.3%, specificity of 96.4 and 83.6%, PPV of 86.7 and 60.9%, and NPV of 96.4 and 97.9%, respectively. Kappa for T stage assessed through ERUS was 0.64 and 0.83 for MCE. CONCLUSION: MCE and 3D-ERUS had good diagnostic performance, but the endoscopic method had higher accuracy. Both methods reliably assessed lesion extension, circumferential involvement, and distance from the anal verge.

Patients' perspectives and the perceptions of healthcare providers in the treatment of early rectal cancer; a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Shared decision-making has become of increased importance in choosing the most suitable treatment strategy for early rectal cancer, however, clinical decision-making is still primarily based on physicians' perspectives. Balancing quality of life and oncological outcomes is difficult, and guidance on patients' involvement in this subject in early rectal cancer is limited. Therefore, this study aimed to explore preferences and priorities of patients as well as physicians' perspectives in treatment for early rectal cancer. METHODS: In this qualitative study, semi-structured interviews were performed with early rectal cancer patients (n = 10) and healthcare providers (n = 10). Participants were asked which factors influenced their preferences and how important these factors were. Thematic analyses were performed. In addition, participants were asked to rank the discussed factors according to importance to gain additional insights. RESULTS: Patients addressed the following relevant factors: the risk of an ostomy, risk of poor bowel function and treatment related complications. Healthcare providers emphasized oncological outcomes as tumour recurrence, risk of an ostomy and poor bowel function. Patients perceived absolute risks of adverse outcome to be lower than healthcare providers and were quite willing undergo organ preservation to achieve a better prospect of quality of life. CONCLUSION: Patients' preferences in treatment of early rectal cancer vary between patients and frequently differ from assumptions of preferences by healthcare providers. To optimize future shared decision-making, healthcare providers should be aware of these differences and should invite patients to explore and address their priorities more explicitly during consultation. Factors deemed important by both physicians and patients should be expressed during consultation to decide on a tailored treatment strategy.

Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer: Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Clinical Features Among Commercially Insured Adults in the United States.

BACKGROUND:  The incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) in patients younger than 50 has been rising over the last several decades, accounting for up to 25% of total cases. Despite the screening age recently being lowered to 45, a significant proportion of cases would still arise at younger ages prior to screening. Nonfamilial early-onset CRC remains a particular concern. Identification of risk factors and clinical features in this age group is needed to improve detection. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort analysis using claims data from the Truven Health MarketScan® Commercial Claims insurance database from 2007 to 2017, patients were identified with colon and rectal cancer, compared across three age groups (ages 18-40, 40-50, and >50), and analyzed for risk factors and clinical features. RESULTS: Female sex was more prevalent in the younger age group compared to age >50 (54% and 51.9% vs. 49.6%), with little change noted between rectal cancer age groups by sex. A higher percentage of younger patients were in the obese age groups compared with older groups for colon cancer, particularly the morbidly obese with BMI >40 (24.94%, 25.75%, and 21.34% in the three age groups). Abdominal pain was a common presenting symptom identified in the age groups <50 compared with age >50 (25% and 19% vs. 14%), along with hematochezia, weight loss, and anemia. CONCLUSIONS: Morbid obesity and female sex may be important risk factors among patients with early-onset CRC. The presence of abdominal pain was more common among the early-onset CRC cohort.

Ensayo clínico multicéntrico para la resección de pólipos rectales mediante un nuevo dispositivo de acceso transanal híbrido laparoendoscópico / Multicenter clinical trial for the resection of rectal polyps using a new laparoendoscopic hybrid transanal access device

Introducción: Los pólipos complejos requieren el uso de técnicas endoscópicas avanzadas o la cirugía mínimamente invasiva para su abordaje. En los pólipos rectales es de especial relevancia llegar a un consenso de cuál es el mejor abordaje de estos para evitar infratratamientos o sobretratamientos que incrementen una morbimortalidad innecesaria. Métodos: Se describe un ensayo clínico piloto con un producto sanitario de primer uso en humanos multicéntrico y prospectivo. Se plantea la hipótesis que UNI-VEC® facilita la cirugía laparoendoscópica transanal para la extirpación de tumores rectales precoces. El objetivo principal es evaluar que es seguro y cumple los requisitos funcionales establecidos. Los secundarios son evaluar resultados, complicaciones y nivel de satisfacción.Resultados: Se reclutaron 16 pacientes en 12 meses con un seguimiento mínimo de dos meses. El tamaño medio ha sido de 3,4 cm, siendo el pólipo mayor de 6 cm. Respecto a la localización, la media se encontraba a 6,6 cm del margen anal. Se realizó resección endoscópica mucosa (REM) (6,3%), disección submucosa endoscópica (DSE) (43,8%), resección espesor completo (REC) (6,3%) y transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) (43,8%). El tiempo medio fueron 73,25 min; 56,3% utiliza una cámara de 30̊ y 43,8% el endoscopio flexible como instrumento de visión. El 56,3% son lesiones benignas y 43,8% malignas. En 87,5% se consigue resección completa. En cuanto a las complicaciones, se presenta sangrado leve (Clavien I) en 25, 6,3 y 21,4% a las 24 h, 48 h y siete días, respectivamente. La continencia se valora según la Escala de Wexner. A los siete días, 60% presentan continencia perfecta, 26,7% IF leve y 13,3% IF moderada. A los 30 días, 66,7% continencia perfecta, 20% IF leve y 13,3% IF moderada. A los dos meses se revisan cuatro de los pacientes que a los 30 días presentaban un Wexner superior al preoperatorio y se demuestra continencia perfecta en 25% de los pacientes, 50% leve y 25% moderada. (AU)

Introduction: Complex polyps require the use of advanced endoscopic techniques or minimally invasive surgery for their approach. In rectal polyps it is of special relevance to reach a consensus on the best approach to avoid under- or overtreatment that increases unnecessary morbidity and mortality. Methods: We describe a prospective, multicenter, pilot clinical trial with a first-in-human medical device. It is hypothesized that UNI-VEC® facilitates transanal laparoendoscopic surgery for the removal of early rectal tumors. The primary objective is to evaluate that it is safe and meets the established functional requirements. Secondary objectives are to evaluate results, complications and level of satisfaction. Results: Sixteen patients were recruited in 12 months with a minimum follow-up of 2 months. The mean size was 3.4 cm with the largest polyp being 6 cm. Regarding location, the mean was 6.6 cm from the anal margin. Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) (6.3%), endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) (43.8%), REC (6.3%) and TAMIS (43.8%) were performed. The mean time was 73.25 min. The 56.3% used a 30° camera and 43.8% used the flexible endoscope as a viewing instrument. The 56.3% were benign lesions and 43.8% malignant. Complete resection is achieved in 87.5%. Regarding complications, mild bleeding (Clavien I) occurred in 25%, 6.3% and 21.4% at 24 h, 48 h and 7 days, respectively. Continence was assessed according to the Wexner scale. At 7 days, 60% showed perfect continence, 26.7% mild FI and 13.3% moderate FI. At 30 days, 66.7% had perfect continence, 20% mild FI and 13.3% moderate FI. At 2 months, 4 patients were reviewed who at 30 days had a Wexner's degree higher than preoperative and perfect continence was demonstrated in 25% of the patients, 50% mild and 25% moderate. (AU)

Clinical consequences of diagnostic variability in the histopathological evaluation of early rectal cancer.

INTRODUCTION: In early rectal cancer, organ sparing treatment strategies such as local excision have gained popularity. The necessity of radical surgery is based on the histopathological evaluation of the local excision specimen. This study aimed to describe diagnostic variability between pathologists, and its impact on treatment allocation in patients with locally excised early rectal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with locally excised pT1-2 rectal cancer were included in this prospective cohort study. Both quantitative measures and histopathological risk factors (i.e. poor differentiation, deep submucosal invasion, and lymphatic- or venous invasion) were evaluated. Interobserver variability was reported by both percentages and Fleiss' Kappa- (ĸ) or intra-class correlation coefficients. RESULTS: A total of 126 patients were included. Ninety-four percent of the original histopathological reports contained all required parameters. In 73 of the 126 (57.9%) patients, at least one discordant parameter was observed, which regarded histopathological risk factors for lymph node metastases in 36 patients (28.6%). Interobserver agreement among different variables varied between 74% and 95% or ĸ 0.530-0.962. The assessment of lymphovascular invasion showed discordances in 26% (ĸ = 0.530, 95% CI 0.375-0.684) of the cases. In fourteen (11%) patients, discordances led to a change in treatment strategy. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that there is substantial interobserver variability between pathologists, especially in the assessment of lymphovascular invasion. Pathologists play a key role in treatment allocation after local excision of early rectal cancer, therefore interobserver variability needs to be reduced to decrease the number of patients that are over- or undertreated.

Endoscopy and MRI for restaging early rectal cancer after neoadjuvant treatment.

AIM: Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) has great potential to downstage rectal cancer. Response assessment has been investigated in locally advanced rectal cancer but not in early stage rectal cancer. The aim is to characterize the diagnostic accuracy of endoscopy performed by surgical endoscopists compared to (diffusion-weighted, DWI) MRI only and a multimodal approach combining (DWI-)MRI and endoscopic information both analysed by an abdominal radiologist for response assessment in early rectal cancer after neoadjuvant CRT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients treated with neoadjuvant CRT for early distal rectal cancer (cT1-3 N0) followed by transanal endoscopic microsurgery were included. Three separate reassessment groups were analysed for response assessment using endoscopic evaluation alone versus (DWI-)MRI alone versus the combination of endoscopy with (DWI-)MRI with a focus on sensitivity and specificity and analysis using receiver operating characteristic curves. RESULTS: Three cohorts (N = 36, N = 25 and N = 25, respectively) were analysed for response assessment. Of the endoscopy cohort, 16 of the 36 patients had a complete response. Area under the curve was 0.69 (0.66-0.74; pooled sensitivity 55.3%, pooled specificity 80.0%). Agreement for scoring separate endoscopic features was poor to moderate. Of the (DWI-)MRI cohort, 11 of the 25 patients had a complete response. Area under the curve for (DWI-)MRI alone was 0.55 (sensitivity 72.7%, specificity 42.9%). The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve improved to 0.68 (sensitivity 90.9%, specificity 75.0%) when (DWI-)MRI was combined with endoscopic information, with 11 out of 25 patients with a complete response. The most accurate response assessment was made by combining endoscopy and (DWI-)MRI with a high negative predictive value (90.9%). CONCLUSION: Good and complete responders after chemoradiation of early stage rectal cancer can be best assessed using a multimodality approach combining endoscopy and (DWI-)MRI.

Multicenter clinical trial for the resection of rectal polyps using a new laparoendoscopic hybrid transanal access device.

INTRODUCTION: Complex polyps require the use of advanced endoscopic techniques or minimally invasive surgery for their approach. In rectal polyps it is of special relevance to reach a consensus on the best approach to avoid under- or overtreatment that increases unnecessary morbidity and mortality. METHODS: We describe a prospective, multicenter, pilot clinical trial with a first-in-human medical device. It is hypothesized that UNI-VEC® facilitates transanal laparoendoscopic surgery for the removal of early rectal tumors. The primary objective is to evaluate that it is safe and meets the established functional requirements. Secondary objectives are to evaluate results, complications and level of satisfaction. RESULTS: 16 patients were recruited in 12 months with a minimum follow-up of 2 months. The mean size was 3.4 cm with the largest polyp being 6 cm. Regarding location, the mean was 6.6 cm from the anal margin. Endoscopic Mucosal Resection (EMR) (6.3%), Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection ESD (43.8%), REC (6.3%) and TAMIS (43.8%) were performed. The mean time was 73.25 min. The 56.3% used a 30° camera and 43.8% used the flexible endoscope as a viewing instrument. The 56.3% were benign lesions and 43.8% malignant. Complete resection is achieved in 87.5%. Regarding complications, mild bleeding (Clavien I) occurred in 25%, 6.3% and 21.4% at 24 h, 48 h and 7 days respectively. Continence was assessed according to the Wexner scale. At 7 days, 60% showed perfect continence, 26.7% mild FI and 13.3% moderate FI. At 30 days, 66.7% had perfect continence, 20% mild FI and 13.3% moderate FI. At 2 months, 4 patients were reviewed who at 30 days had a Wexner's degree higher than preoperative and perfect continence was demonstrated in 25% of the patients, 50% mild and 25% moderate. In no case did rectal perforation or major complications requiring urgent reintervention occur. As for the level of reproducibility, safety, level of satisfaction with the device and evaluation of the blister, the evaluation on a scale of 0-10 (9.43, 9.71, 9.29 and 9.50 respectively). All the investigators have previous experience with transanal devices. CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrates the efficacy and safety of UNI-VEC® for the treatment of rectal lesions. It will facilitate the implementation of hybrid procedures that seek to solve the limitations of pure endoscopic techniques by allowing the concomitant use of conventional laparoscopic and robotic instrumentation with the flexible endoscope.

Local Excision for Early Rectal Cancer.

Local excision is an established treatment for significant benign rectal tumours and early-stage cancers. It provides cure for most patients with pT1 disease, with minimum impact on quality of life. It is particularly suitable for elderly or comorbid patients. Local excision is associated with a risk of local recurrence, and this may vary from 5 to 30%, as determined by pathological risk factors. Recurrent cancer may be challenging to manage, but this may be mitigated by early detection with intensive surveillance and the use of adjuvant radiotherapy. This approach offers a realistic option for organ preservation in carefully selected early-stage disease compared with primary treatment with radiotherapy or total neoadjuvant treatment.

Initial Experience With Trans-anal Minimally Invasive Surgery (TAMIS) for Rectal Polyps and Early Colorectal Cancers at Cumberland Infirmary, Carlisle.

INTRODUCTION: Bowel cancer is the fourth most common type of cancer in the United Kingdom in 2019. Total mesorectal excision is the standard procedure for the removal of rectal tumors, however, it comes with serious side effects. Therefore, less invasive procedures and sphincter preservation techniques have been developed, like conventional trans-anal excision, and trans-anal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM). In 2010, trans-anal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) was introduced as an alternative to TEM, which offers the same benefits as TEM but at a lower cost and without the need for specialized instrumentation. This study aims to assess the practicability and safety of this technique and to report its findings.  Methods: Retrospective data of all patients who underwent TAMIS at Cumberland Infirmary (Carlisle, UK) from July 2017 to July 2022 for large benign rectal polyps or early rectal cancer were collected. Variables collected included patients' age, gender, number of procedures per year, perioperative outcome, and histopathology outcome. The SPSS version 21 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) was used for both descriptive and inferential analyses of the data. RESULTS: During a five-year period, 42 patients underwent TAMIS at Cumberland Infirmary. The primary indication for TAMIS was distal rectal lesions, large rectal polyps up to 120 mm, and early rectal cancer (T1). The median age of the assessed patients at the time of surgery was 71 years with 64.29% (27) male and 35.71% (15) female. The mean operating time was 123 minutes (range 45 to 240 minutes). The surgical and pathological outcome included a mean polyp size of 6 cm (+/- 0.8 cm), a rate of specimen fragmentation at 19.04% (n=8), and a rate of positive margins at 04.76% (n=2), whereas histology of 73.81% (n=31) was tubulovillous adenoma and 11.91% (n=5) was adenocarcinoma. There was no 30-day postoperative mortality, however, the 30-day re-operation rate was 02.39% (n=1) and the recurrence rate which needed further intervention was 26.19% (n=11). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that TAMIS produces positive results. The size of the lesions removed, and the effect of an early learning curve are reflected in the rate of specimen fragmentation and polyp recurrence. Nonetheless, TAMIS is a safe and effective alternative to total mesorectal excision for certain types of rectal lesions and should be used for more proximal and complex rectal lesions.

Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgical Submucosal Dissection: An Efficient Treatment Option for Giant Superficial Neoplastic Lesions of the Rectum.

Introduction: The resection of giant superficial neoplastic lesions of the rectum (>5 cm) is challenging even for experienced specialists. Endoscopic mucosal resection, endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), and transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) have all been used for the treatment of such tumors. However, because of their individual disadvantages, the ideal technique for the treatment of these lesions has yet to be determined. Transanal endoscopic microsurgical submucosal dissection (TEM-ESD) is a recently developed hybrid technique that combines the advantages of conventional TEM and flexible ESD. The aim of our study was to assess the feasibility and outcomes of TEM-ESD for the resection of giant superficial rectal neoplasms. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed all cases of TEM-ESD performed in the Department of Surgery of the Municipal Hospital of Karlsruhe between 2010 and 2020 and isolated 43 patients with superficial rectal lesions >5 cm according to the postoperative histology report. The diagnostic, perioperative, histological, and follow-up data of the patients were analyzed in the form of a retrospective, observational cohort study. Results: We identified 43 cases matching our criteria, including 35 adenomas and 8 occult adenocarcinomas. The median size of the lesions was 75 mm and the median operating time was 81.5 min. En bloc resection was possible in all cases, and histologically complete en bloc resection was confirmed in 29 cases. Five patients presented with postoperative bleeding, 2 of which were treated conservatively, 2 were treated endoscopically, and 1 required revision surgery. The median follow-up period was 15 months. There was no recurrence among patients with adenomas, 1 recurrence of a low-risk carcinoma, and 1 recurrence after the resection of a high-risk carcinoma in a patient that refused further treatment. During the follow-up period, 3 patients developed a stenosis, which was treated endoscopically. Conclusions: TEM-ESD is a feasible and safe therapeutic option for the treatment of giant superficial rectal neoplasms.

Prognosis of Patients Over 60 Years Old With Early Rectal Cancer Undergoing Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery - A Single-Center Experience.

Aim: Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) is widely performed in early rectal cancer. This technique offers greater organ preservation and decreases the risk of subsequent surgery. However, postoperative local recurrence and distant metastasis remain challenges for patients with high-risk pathological factors. This single-center study reports the prognosis of early rectal cancer patients over 60 years old after TEM. Methods: The data of the patients over 60 years old who underwent local anal resection were collected retrospectively. Moreover, the 5-year follow-up data were analyzed to determine the 5-year DFS and OS. Results: 47 early rectal cancer patients over 60 years old underwent TEM. There were 27 patients with high-risk factors and 20 patients without high-risk factors. Two patients underwent radical surgery after TEM and ten patients received adjuvant treatment. Local recurrence occurred in 7 patients, of which 4 underwent salvage surgery. The 5-year progression-free survival rate was 75.6%, which was lower in the high-risk patients group (69.6%) than in the non-high-risk patients group (83.3%) (P>0.05). The 5-year OS was 90.2%, but there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (high-risk patients 87.0%, non-high-risk patients 94.4%). Furthermore, there was no significant difference in DFS and OS between people over and under 70 years old. Conclusion: Some high-risk factor patients over 60 years old do not have inferior 5-year DFS and OS to the non-high-risk patients. TEM is an option for old patients with high surgical risks. Even if postoperative pathology revealed high-risk factors, timely surgical treatment after local recurrence would be beneficial to improve the 5-year DFS and OS.

MDT stage migration in MRI of significant rectal polyps and early rectal cancers.

PURPOSE: To audit the diagnostic accuracy of MRI for staging early and polyp rectal cancers with the purpose of identifying scope for service improvement. METHODS: This is an IRB approved retrospective study of patients who underwent staging MRI for rectal growths followed by upfront TME type surgery or local excision without neoadjuvant therapy between 2018 and 2021. MR-T-stage was compared with surgical histopathology. The degree of stage migration in the multidisciplinary team meetings (MDT) was assessed and training needs were identified. RESULTS: 53 patients (32 males) with a mean (SD) age of 56.7 (13.6) years with 54 rectal lesions and underwent trans-anal excision (n = 18) or upfront surgery (n = 35) were included. Pathology showed < / = pT1 stage in n = 18 and > / = pT2 stage in n = 36. Radio-pathological concordance rate was 38.9% and 74.1%, respectively, for primary reports and MDT reads, respectively, and during MDT, the rates improved by 44.5% and 30.5% for < / = pT1 and > / = pT2 stages ,respectively. The overall T-stage migration rate at MDT was 44.6% (25/54) and the migration rate was higher (61.1%) for < / = pT1 stage lesions. The best sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy of MRI for T-staging was 83.3%, 91.6%, 83.3%, 91.6% and 88.8%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Radio-pathological correlation for MRI T-stage is excellent for MDT reads by experienced radiologists. MDT reads lead to significant down-staging of T-stage in polyp and early rectal cancer thereby improving radio-path correlation.

[Results of total mesorectal excision and transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal adenocarcinoma with submucosal invasion]. / Rezul'taty total'noi mezorektumektomii i transanal'noi endomikrokhirurgii pri adenokartsinomakh pryamoi kishki s invaziei v podslizistyi sloi.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze early and long-term outcomes after total mesorectal excision (TME) and transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) in patients with T1 rectal cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective non-randomized comparative study included 2 groups of patients: group 1 - total mesorectal excision, group 2 - transanal endoscopic microsurgery. In the second group, total mesorectal excision was proposed for patients with tumor invasion depth pT1sm3 and/or lymphovascular invasion and/or low differentiation. If total mesorectal excision was performed as a salvage surgery, the patient was excluded from further analysis. RESULTS: There were 156 patients with rectal adenocarcinoma pT1 between October 2011 and August 2019 (102 cases - TEM, 54 cases - TME). We excluded 10 patients from the TEM group due to salvage surgery. Duration of TEM was 40.0 (34; 50) min, TME - 139 (120; 180) min (p=0.00001). Postoperative hospital-stay was also significantly less in the TEM group (7 (6; 9) vs. 10 (7; 11) days, p=0.00001). Six (6.5%) patients in the TEM group and 1 (1.8%) patient in the TME group developed a local recurrence in pelvic cavity (p=0.1). There were no distant metastases. Disease-free 3-year survival was 92% after TEM and 96% after TME (p=0.058). CONCLUSION: Transanal endoscopic microsurgery is a relatively safe alternative to total mesorectal excision for early rectal cancer.

Can we Save the rectum by watchful waiting or TransAnal surgery following (chemo)Radiotherapy versus Total mesorectal excision for early REctal Cancer (STAR-TREC)? Protocol for the international, multicentre, rolling phase II/III partially randomized patient preference trial evaluating long-course concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus short-course radiotherapy organ preservation approaches.

AIM: Organ-saving treatment for early-stage rectal cancer can reduce patient-reported side effects compared to standard total mesorectal excision (TME) and preserve quality of life. An optimal strategy for achieving organ preservation and longer-term oncological outcomes are unknown; thus there is a need for high quality trials. METHOD: Can we Save the rectum by watchful waiting or TransAnal surgery following (chemo)Radiotherapy versus Total mesorectal excision for early REctal Cancer (STAR-TREC) is an international three-arm multicentre, partially randomized controlled trial incorporating an external pilot. In phase III, patients with cT1-3b N0 tumours, ≤40 mm in diameter, who prefer organ preservation are randomized 1:1 between mesorectal long-course chemoradiation versus mesorectal short-course radiotherapy, with selective transanal microsurgery. Patients preferring radical surgery receive TME. STAR-TREC aims to recruit 380 patients to organ preservation and 120 to TME surgery. The primary outcome is the rate of organ preservation at 30 months. Secondary clinician-reported outcomes include acute treatment-related toxicity, rate of non-operative management, non-regrowth pelvic tumour control at 36 months, non-regrowth disease-free survival at 36 months and overall survival at 60 months, and patient-reported toxicity, health-related quality of life at baseline, 12 and 24 months. Exploratory biomarker research uses circulating tumour DNA to predict response and relapse. DISCUSSION: STAR-TREC will prospectively evaluate contrasting therapeutic strategies and implement new measures including a smaller mesorectal target volume, two-step response assessment and non-operative management for complete response. The trial will yield important information to guide routine management of patients with early-stage rectal cancer.