Chemistry and crystal engineering.

Recent studies published in the Chemistry and crystal engineering section of IUCrJ emphasize developments both in methodology and techniques as well as the diverse range of classes of compounds being studied and of problems being tackled.

Representation of Women Among Cardiothoracic Surgery Editorial Boards: Trends Over the Past Two Decades.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to examine representation of women on CT journal editorial boards over the past two decades to identify changes over time compared to women CT surgeon and trainee representation, and to highlight additional opportunities for improvement. METHODS: The editorial boards of two high impact CT journals were reviewed from 2000 to 2023. Data on editorial board positions including editors-in-chief, associate/deputy editors, feature editors, and general members of the editorial board were abstracted. The proportion of women editors was assessed. Data were compared to publicly available information from the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) on physician specialty by sex. RESULTS: Of 3,460 editorial positions, 332 (9.6%) were held by women. Women occupied 2.2% (n=1/45) of editor-in-chief positions, 13.2% (n=78/592) of senior editor positions, 11.5% (n=33/287) of feature editor positions, and 8.3% (n=221/2,663) of general editorial board positions. The proportion of women holding any editorial board position significantly increased from 2.4% in 2000 to 18.2% in 2023 (p=0.01). Overall, editorial board representation increased at a mean ± standard deviation rate of 0.7%±1.3% per year, not significantly different from the growth of practicing women CT surgeons at 0.3%±0.5% per year (p=0.584). DISCUSSION: Representation of women on CT journal editorial boards has increased commensurate with the increasing proportion of practicing women CT surgeons, though remains at 16%. Work remains to continue the recruitment of women to CT surgery as well as to identify the key elements that can support them in positions of leadership.

Assessing the H-Indexes of Editorial Board Members in Ophthalmology Journals Published in Türkiye.

Objectives: The focus of this study was to assess and compare the h-indexes of editorial board members from eight ophthalmology journals in Türkiye and explore the potential correlations between these indexes and the sub-specialties of board members. Methods: Conducted in December 2023, this cross-sectional study utilized publicly available data from Google Scholar (GS), Web of Science, and Scopus. The h-index and number of publications by editorial board members from eight Turkish ophthalmology journals were analyzed. Statistical analysis for this study involved the use of SPSS, employing descriptive statistics, one-way analysis of variance, and post hoc tests for group comparisons. Results: Of the 415 editorial board members, 26 were not ophthalmologists and 12 worked abroad; the credentials of 10 could not be verified. A total of 367 authors were evaluated, revealing significant differences in publication numbers and h-indices among the different subspecialties. Notably, the retinal specialists demonstrated higher productivity. Variability in citation counts was observed across databases, with GS having the widest range. Differences were also noted in the publication and h-index among the editorial boards of different journals. Conclusion: The h-index and number of publications effectively reflected the active status of ophthalmology authors. This study contributes valuable information regarding Turkish ophthalmology journals and their editorial boards, serving as an inspiration for young ophthalmologists. These findings underscore the diverse successes of ophthalmologists across subspecialties, encouraging the exploration of less-explored areas in academic pursuits.

Editorial. / Od Redakcji.

No summary.

[Éditorial. De la médecine curative à la médecine préventive sous tous ses aspects]. / Éditorial. De la médecine curative à la médecine préventive sous tous ses aspects.

/.

/.

Gender Representation Trends in Cardiothoracic Surgery Journal Editorial Boards.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to characterize chronologic trends of gender composition of major cardiothoracic surgery journal editorial boards in the current era. METHODS: A cross-sectional analysis was performed of gender representation in editorial board members of two North American cardiothoracic surgery journals from 2008 to 2023. Member names and roles were collected from available monthly issues. Validated software programming was used to classify gender. The annual proportion of women representation was compared to the thoracic surgery workforce. RESULTS: During the study period, 558 individuals (3,641 names) were identified, 14.3% of whom were women. The total number of editorial board women increased for both journals. The proportion of women also increased from 2.5% (3/118) in 2008 to 17.8% (71/399) in 2023 (P < .001), exceeding the percentage of women in the thoracic surgery workforce which increased from 3.8% in 2007 to 8.3% in 2021 (P < .001). The average duration of participation was longer for men than for women (53.8 vs 44.5 months, P = .01). Women in editorial board senior roles also increased from 3.3% (1/30) in 2008 to 28.6% (42/147) in 2023 (P < .001), almost triple the increase in non-designated roles from 2.3% (2/88) in 2008 to 11.5% (29/252) in 2023 (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: In recent years, the appointment of women to high-impact cardiothoracic surgery journal editorial boards and senior roles have proportionally exceeded the overall representation of women in cardiothoracic surgery. These findings indicate progress in inclusive efforts and offer insight towards reducing academic gender disparities.

How to be a good reviewer: A step-by-step guide for approaching peer review of a scientific manuscript.

Objectives: The peer review process is critical to maintaining quality, reliability, novelty, and innovation in the scientific literature. However, the teaching of scientific peer review is rarely a component of formal scientific or clinical training, and even the most experienced peer reviewers express interest in continuing education. The objective of this review article is to summarize the collective perspectives of experienced journal editors about how to be a good reviewer in a step-by-step guide that can serve as a resource for the performance of peer review of a scientific manuscript. Methods: This is a narrative review. Results: A review of the history and an overview of the modern-day peer review process are provided with attention to the role played by the reviewer, including important reasons for involvement in scientific peer review. The general components of a scientific peer review are described, and a model for how to structure a peer review report is provided. These concepts are also summarized in a reviewer checklist that can be used in real-time to develop and double-check one's reviewer report before submitting it. Conclusions: Peer review is a critically important service for maintaining quality in the scientific literature. Peer review of a scientific manuscript and the associated reviewer's report should assess specific details related to the accuracy, validity, novelty, and interpretation of a study's results. We hope that this article will serve as a resource and guide for reviewers of all levels of experience in the performance of peer review of a scientific manuscript.

Addressing metallosis in knee arthroplasty: From diagnostic challenges to innovative treatments.

In this editorial, we comment on the article by Toro et al published in the recent issue of World Journal of Orthopedics. This editorial review provides a comprehensive exploration of the landscape surrounding knee arthroplasty metallosis, focusing on key aspects ranging from the mechanisms influencing susceptibility to clinical implications and advanced treatment strategies. We elucidate the complex interplay of implant design, patient-specific variables, and wear-related processes contributing to metallosis. Furthermore, we seek to shed light on diagnostic challenges, the necessity of a multidisciplinary approach, and the imperative for vigilant implant surveillance. Uni-on-uni revision, as a targeted treatment modality, is discussed, highlighting its potential to address metallosis in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). There is a need for heightened awareness among clinicians regarding the subtle presentations of metallosis, coupled with the limitations of traditional imaging techniques. Addressing metallosis requires a collaborative, multidisciplinary approach to effectively navigate the complexities associated with this complication. Furthermore, the review emphasizes the evolving paradigm of personalized care, with uni-on-uni revision emerging as a promising surgical solution. In conclusion, the editorial outlines the dynamic nature of knee arthroplasty metallosis and its multifaceted impact on clinical practice. It calls for ongoing collaboration, education, and integration of innovative solutions to enhance diagnostic accuracy, proactive management, and overall patient outcomes in the realm of UKA.

Metastatic clear cell sarcoma of the pancreas: From diagnosis to treatment.

This article presents a comprehensive case report on an uncommon instance of metastatic clear cell sarcoma (CCS) originating from the pancreas. The high mortality rate of pancreatic carcinoma underscores the importance of precise diagnosis and early detection. The authors report a novel case of CCS with pancreatic metastasis, detailing successful surgical intervention through distal pancreatectomy and splenectomy, resulting in favourable outcomes. This study highlights the standard role of surgery in treating advanced CCS and emphasizes preoperative imaging and thorough patient history assessment. This article also underscores the necessity for long-term surveillance due to the potential for recurrence or metastasis. Despite the favourable recovery postsurgery, the absence of subsequent follow-up evaluation prompts consideration of the need for extended monitoring. This article raises questions about the nature of the pancreatic lesion and suggests the possibility of a primary lesion. Further evidence is crucial to establish the correlation between the features related to the development of the patient's primary and metastatic tumours. In conclusion, this study offers valuable insights into metastatic CCS of the pancreas, highlighting the importance of regular postoperative follow-up for improved outcomes through early detection and intervention.

[Éditorial. La radiothérapie dix ans après]. / Éditorial. La radiothérapie dix ans après.

/.

/.

Consolidated Reporting Guidelines for Prognostic and Diagnostic Machine Learning Models (CREMLS).

The number of papers presenting machine learning (ML) models that are being submitted to and published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research and other JMIR Publications journals has steadily increased. Editors and peer reviewers involved in the review process for such manuscripts often go through multiple review cycles to enhance the quality and completeness of reporting. The use of reporting guidelines or checklists can help ensure consistency in the quality of submitted (and published) scientific manuscripts and, for example, avoid instances of missing information. In this Editorial, the editors of JMIR Publications journals discuss the general JMIR Publications policy regarding authors' application of reporting guidelines and specifically focus on the reporting of ML studies in JMIR Publications journals, using the Consolidated Reporting of Machine Learning Studies (CREMLS) guidelines, with an example of how authors and other journals could use the CREMLS checklist to ensure transparency and rigor in reporting.

Gender Parity Analysis of the Editorial Boards of Influential Dermatology Journals: Cross-Sectional Study.

This study underscores the persistent underrepresentation of women in academic dermatology leadership positions by examining the gender composition of editorial boards across top dermatology journals, emphasizing the urgent need for proactive strategies to promote diversity, equity, and inclusion.