AI-based Fully-Automated Stress Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction as a Prognostic Marker in Patients Undergoing Stress-CMR.

AIM: To determine in patients undergoing stress CMR whether fully automated stress artificial intelligence (AI)-based left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEFAI) can provide incremental prognostic value to predict death above traditional prognosticators. MATERIEL AND RESULTS: Between 2016 and 2018, we conducted a longitudinal study that included all consecutive patients referred for vasodilator stress CMR. LVEFAI was assessed using AI-algorithm combines multiple deep learning networks for LV segmentation. The primary outcome was all-cause death assessed using the French National Registry of Death. Cox regression was used to evaluate the association of stress LVEFAI with death after adjustment for traditional risk factors and CMR findings.In 9,712 patients (66±15 years, 67% men), there was an excellent correlation between stress LVEFAI and LVEF measured by expert (LVEFexpert) (r=0.94, p<0.001). Stress LVEFAI was associated with death (median [IQR] follow-up 4.5 [3.7-5.2] years) before and after adjustment for risk factors (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.84 [95% CI, 0.82-0.87] per 5% increment, p<0.001). Stress LVEFAI had similar significant association with death occurrence compared with LVEFexpert. After adjustment, stress LVEFAI value showed the greatest improvement in model discrimination and reclassification over and above traditional risk factors and stress CMR findings (C-statistic improvement: 0.11; NRI=0.250; IDI=0.049, all p<0.001; LR-test p<0.001), with an incremental prognostic value over LVEFAI determined at rest. CONCLUSION: AI-based fully automated LVEF measured at stress is independently associated with the occurrence of death in patients undergoing stress CMR, with an additional prognostic value above traditional risk factors, inducible ischemia and LGE.

Prescription patterns of SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with type 2 diabetes and heart failure with reduced ejection fracture admitted to a tertiary care centre in Ontario, Canada.

OBJECTIVE: To assess early adoption patterns of SGLT2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) in eligible patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and heart failure with reduced ejection fracture (HFrEF) and identify gaps in practice. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of patients with T2DM and HFrEF admitted with decompensated heart failure to The Ottawa Hospital under Cardiology or GIM from June 2019-May 2021 was conducted. Patterns were assessed at 8-months intervals (1 period before the release of Diabetes Canada 2020 guidelines and 2 periods afterwards). Baseline patient characteristics, co-morbidities and prescriber information was collected. RESULTS: Of the 98 patients that met the inclusion criteria, 36.7% had a prescription for an SGLT2i either on admission, discharge or follow-up. Trends showed a gradual increase over time. On admission, 9.8% of patients were on an SGLT2i in period 1, 19.2% in period 2 and 23.3% in period 3. Patients receiving a prescription for SGLT2i on discharge were 0.0% in period 1, 10.0% in period 2 and 9.5% in period 3, all which were admitted under Cardiology. On follow-up, 13.9% of eligible patients were started on an SGLT2i in period 1, 21.1% in period 2 and 35.0% in period 3. Endocrinology was the main prescriber of SGLT2i in the outpatient setting, followed by Cardiology. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, trends show a slow but steady increase in early prescriptions of SGLT2i. However, most eligible patients were not started on therapy during our study period with variability in practice between specialties, highlighting opportunities to boost uptake in the future.

Anti-obesity medications in the management of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: available evidence and next STEPS.

Obesity is associated with an increased risk of incident heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and, among patients with existing heart failure, is associated with worse quality of life, higher symptom burden, and more HF hospitalizations. Anti-obesity medication (AOM) semaglutide has been shown to be efficacious at both causing intentional weight loss and improving HF symptom burden, with some evidence to suggest that HF clinical events may also be reduced. Additional ongoing trials of AOM in patients with cardiovascular disease, including HFpEF, will further improve insight into the potential role of managing obesity to improve HF status among patients with HFpEF and obesity.

Tricuspid Regurgitation in Patients With Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction: JACC State-of-the-Art Review.

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Important risk factors for the development of HFpEF are similar to risk factors for the progression of tricuspid regurgitation (TR), and both conditions frequently coexist and thus is a distinct phenotype or a marker for advanced HF. Many patients with severe, symptomatic atrial secondary TR have been enrolled in current transcatheter device trials, and may represent patients at an advanced stage of HFpEF. Management of HFpEF thus may affect the pathophysiology of TR, and the physiologic changes that occur following transcatheter treatment of TR, may also impact symptoms and outcomes in patients with HFpEF. This review discusses these issues and suggests possible management strategies for these patients.

Mavacamten in Right Ventricular Outflow Tract Obstruction.

Right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) obstruction is a rare complication of ventricular hypertrophy in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). This study presents an unusual case of a patient with HCM with severe RVOT obstruction that was relieved successfully through the use of mavacamten.

Coronary Artery Disease Is A Stronger Predictor of All-Cause Mortality Than Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Among Patients With Newly Diagnosed Heart Failure: Insights From the WDHR.

BACKGROUND: In patients with newly diagnosed heart failure (HF) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <50%, little is known whether LVEF per se or presence of coronary artery disease (CAD) provides independent prognostic information on all-cause mortality. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using the WDHR (Western Denmark Heart Registry), we identified 3620 patients with newly diagnosed HF and LVEF 10% to 49% referred for first-time coronary angiography as part of general workup of HF. Patients were stratified by LVEF (10%-35% versus 36%-49%) and presence of CAD. We estimated 10-year all-cause mortality risk and calculated hazard ratios adjusted for relevant comorbidities and risk factors (aHRs). CAD was present in 1592 (44%) patients. Lower LVEF was associated with a relative 15% increased 10-year mortality: 37% for LVEF 36% to 49% versus 42% for LVEF 10% to 35% (aHR, 1.15 [95% CI, 0.99-1.34]). This result did not change when stratified into those with CAD (52% versus 56%; aHR, 1.11 [95% CI, 0.91-1.35]) and those without CAD (27% versus 33%; aHR, 1.24 [95% CI, 0.97-1.57]). In comparison, presence and extent of CAD were associated with a relative 43% increased 10-year mortality (CAD versus no CAD, 55.0% versus 31.5%; aHR, 1.43 [95% CI, 1.25-1.64]). Compared with a matched general population, excess mortality risk was higher for patients with HF and CAD (54.7% versus 26.3%; aHR, 2.10 [95% CI, 1.85-2.39]) versus those with HF and no CAD (31.4% versus 17.2%; aHR, 1.76 [95% CI, 1.52-2.02]). CONCLUSIONS: Among newly diagnosed patients with HF and LVEF <50%, presence and extent of CAD are associated with substantial higher all-cause mortality risk than lower LVEF.

Are Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors the Cherry on Top of Cardio-Oncology Care?

The increasing aging of the population combined with improvements in cancer detection and care has significantly improved the survival and quality of life of cancer patients. These benefits are hampered by the increase of cardiovascular diseases being heart failure the most frequent manifestation of cardiotoxicity and becoming the major cause of morbidity and mortality among cancer survivor. Current strategies to prevent cardiotoxicity involves different approaches such as optimal management of CV risk factors, use of statins and/or neurohormonal medications, and, in some cases, even the use of chelating agents. As a class, SGLT2-i have revolutionized the therapeutic horizon of HF patients independently of their ejection fraction or glycemic status. There is an abundance of data from translational and observational clinical studies supporting a potential beneficial role of SGLT2-i in mitigating the cardiotoxic effects of cancer patients receiving anthracyclines. These findings underscore the need for more robust clinical trials to investigate the effect on cardiovascular outcomes of the prophylactic SGLT2-i treatment in patients undergoing cancer treatment.

Heart Failure With Improved Ejection Fraction: Prevalence, Predictors, and Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy.

Recently, a new category of heart failure with improved ejection fraction (HFimpEF) has emerged in the classification system. This is defined as the subgroup of patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) whose left ventricular ejection fraction has recovered partially or completely, with no specific cut-off values established yet in the guidelines. In our review, we aim to provide an overview of prevalence, predictors, mechanism of remodeling, and management strategies regarding HFimpEF. These patients constitute a sizeable cohort among patients with reduced ejection fraction. Certain patient characteristics including younger age and female gender, absence of comorbid conditions, low levels of biomarkers, and non-ischemic etiology were identified as positive predictors. The heart undergoes significant maladaptive changes post failure leading to adverse remodeling influenced etiology and duration. Goal-directed medical therapy including beta-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) have notably improved cardiac function by inducing reverse remodeling. Despite a more favorable prognosis compared to HFrEF, patients with improved ejection fraction (EF) still face clinical events and reduced quality of life, and remain at risk of adverse outcomes. Although the evidence is scarce, it is advisable to continue treatment modalities despite improvement in EF, including device therapies, to prevent relapse and clinical deterioration. It is imperative to conduct further research to understand the mechanism leading to EF amelioration and establish guidelines to identify and direct management strategies.

Considerations in the Diagnosis and Management of Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Left Heart Disease.

Pulmonary hypertension associated with left heart disease (PH-LHD) remains the most common cause of pulmonary hypertension globally. Etiologies include heart failure with reduced and preserved ejection fraction and left-sided valvular heart diseases. Despite the increasing prevalence of PH-LHD, there remains a paucity of knowledge about the hemodynamic definition, diagnosis, treatment modalities, and prognosis among clinicians. Moreover, clinical trials have produced mixed results on the usefulness of pulmonary vasodilator therapies for PH-LHD. In this expert review, we have outlined the critical role of meticulous hemodynamic evaluation and provocative testing for cases of diagnostic uncertainty. Therapeutic strategies-pharmacologic, device-based, and surgical therapies used for managing PH-LHD-are also outlined. PH-LHD in advanced heart failure, and the role of mechanical circulatory support in PH-LHD is briefly explored. An in-depth understanding of PH-LHD by all clinicians is needed for improved recognition and outcomes among patients with PH-LHD.

Spironolactone Reduces the Risk of Death in Veterans With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction.

BACKGROUND: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a complex syndrome increasing in prevalence and affecting millions worldwide but with limited evidence-based therapies. Results from explanatory clinical trials suggest that spironolactone may help to improve outcomes in patients with HFpEF. We sought to investigate the effectiveness of spironolactone in reducing death and hospitalization outcomes for patients with HFpEF in a real-world setting. METHODS AND RESULTS: We used electronic health records from the US Veterans Affairs (VA) health care system between 2002 and 2012 to identify patients with HFpEF who were followed longitudinally through 2014 using a validated algorithm. Among our HFpEF cohort that is 96% men, 85% White individuals, and aged 74±11 years, 3690 spironolactone users and 49 191 nonusers were identified and followed for a median of 2.9 (interquartile range [IQR], 1.5-2.4) and 3.3 (IQR, 1.6-5.9) years, respectively. We evaluated the effect of spironolactone use on all-cause death and number of days hospitalized per year for heart failure or for any cause by fitting generalized estimating equation-based Poisson and negative binomial models. Crude rates of 10.3 versus 13.5 deaths and 394.0 versus 485.9 days hospitalized were observed per 100 person-years for spironolactone users versus nonusers, respectively. After multivariable adjustment, there was a 21% reduction (95% CI, 13-29; P<0.0001) in rate of all-cause death among spironolactone users compared with nonusers and no statistically significant difference in days hospitalized for all causes or heart failure. CONCLUSIONS: In a real-world national cohort of patients with HFpEF, spironolactone use reduced all-cause death and demonstrated a favorable trend in reducing the burden of hospitalizations.

Ventriculo-arterial (VA) coupling and fQRS as new selection criteria for primary prevention ICD placement.

For decades, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF < 35%) has been a mainstay for identifying heart failure (HF) patients most likely to benefit from an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). However, LVEF is a poor predictor of sudden cardiac death (SCD) and ignores 50% of HF patients with mildly reduced and preserved LVEF. The current international guidelines for primary prophylaxis ICD therapy are inadequate. Instead of LVEF, which is not a good measure of LV contractility or hemodynamic characterization, we hypothesize ventriculo-arterial (VA) coupling combined with fragmented QRS (fQRS) will improve risk stratification and patient suitability for an ICD. Quantifying cardiac and aortic mechanics, and predicting active arrhythmogenic substrate, from varying fQRS morphologies, may help to stratify ischemic and non-ischemic patients with different functional capacities and predisposition for lethal arrhythmias. We propose HF patients with a low physiological reserve may not benefit from ICD therapy, whereas those patients with higher reserves and extensive arrhythmogenic substrate may benefit. Our hypothesis combining VA coupling with fQRS changes has the potential to widen HF patient participation (low and high LVEF) and advance personalized medicine for HF patients at high risk of SCD.

Prognostic impact of new-onset atrial fibrillation in myocardial infarction with and without improved ejection fraction.

AIMS: Improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction (impEF) often presents in contemporary acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients. New-onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF) during AMI is an important predictor of subsequential heart failure (HF), while its impact on the trajectory of post-MI left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and prognostic implication in patients with and without impEF remains undetermined. We aimed to investigate the prognostic impacts of NOAF in AMI patients with and without impEF. METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive AMI patients without a prior history of AF between February 2014 and March 2018 with baseline LVEF ≤ 40% and had ≥1 LVEF measurement after baseline were included. ImpEF was defined as a baseline LVEF ≤ 40% and a re-evaluation showed both LVEF > 40% and an absolute increase of LVEF ≥ 10%. Persistently reduced EF (prEF) was defined as the second measurement of LVEF either ≤40% or an absolute increase of LVEF < 10%. The primary endpoint was a major adverse cardiac event (MACE) that was composed of cardiovascular death and HF hospitalization. Cox regression analysis and competing risk analysis were performed to assess the association of post-MI NOAF with MACE. Among 293 patients (mean age: 66.6 ± 11.3 years, 79.2% of males), 145 (49.5%) had impEF and 67 (22.9%) developed NOAF. Higher heart rate (odds ratio [OR]: 0.84, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.73-0.97; P = 0.015), prior MI (OR: 0.25, 95% CI: 0.09-0.69; P = 0.008), and STEMI (OR: 0.40, 95% CI: 0.21-0.77; P = 0.006) were independent predictors of post-MI impEF. Within up to 5 years of follow-up, there were 22 (15.2%) and 53 (35.8%) MACE in patients with impEF and prEF, respectively. NOAF was an independent predictor of MACE in patients with impEF (hazard ratio [HR]: 7.34, 95% CI: 2.49-21.59; P < 0.001) but not in those with prEF (HR: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.39-1.55; P = 0.483) after multivariable adjustment. Similar results were obtained when accounting for the competing risk of all-cause death (subdistribution HR and 95% CIs in impEF and prEF were 6.47 [2.32-18.09] and 0.79 [0.39-1.61], respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The NOAF was associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular outcomes in AMI patients with impEF.

Incidence of Coronary Artery Disease After Permanent Pacemaker Implantation: A Hospital-based Study from East India.

Bradyarrhythmias, characterized by heart rates of <60 bpm due to conduction issues, carry risks of sudden cardiac death and falls. Pacemaker implantation is a standard treatment, but the interplay between bradyarrhythmias, coronary artery disease (CAD), and patient attributes requires further exploration. This study was a retrospective hospital record-based study that analyzed data from 699 patients who underwent pacemaker implantation for symptomatic bradyarrhythmias between February 2019 and February 2022. Clinical parameters, coronary angiography (CAG) findings, ejection fraction, and indications for pacemaker implantation were documented. The relationship between CAD severity, specific bradyarrhythmias, and ejection fraction was explored. Statistical analysis included chi-squared tests and t tests. The mean age of the study population (n = 699) was 66.75 years (male:female ratio, 70:30), with 77.2% having type 2 diabetes and 61.6% being hypertensive. The majority of patients had minor or non-obstructive CAD (61.8%), followed by normal CAG findings (25.75%) and obstructive CAD (12.45%). Complete heart block (CHB) was the primary indication for pacemaker implantation (55.2%), followed by sick sinus syndrome (22.3%). The results did not show any association between ejection fraction and CAG findings. Patients who presented with CHB had a higher incidence of obstructive CAD, indicating greater severity. This study sheds light on the intricate interplay between severe bradyarrhythmias, CAD, and patient characteristics. Our analysis revealed no statistical significance between obstructive CAD and the need for a permanent pacemaker. This makes us question our practice of maintaining a low threshold for coronary angiography during pacemaker implantation. The observed low yield and anticoagulation protocol reassure us of the choice to delay this diagnostic intervention. These insights can guide tailored management strategies, enhancing clinical care approaches for patients with severe bradyarrhythmias necessitating pacemaker implantation.

Beyond quadruple therapy: the potential roles for ivabradine, vericiguat, and omecamtiv mecarbil in the therapeutic armamentarium.

Quadruple therapy is effective for patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, providing significant clinical benefits, including reduced mortality. Clinicians are now in an era focused on how to initiate and titrate quadrable therapy in the early phase of the disease trajectory, including during heart failure hospitalization. However, patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction still face a significant "residual risk" of mortality and heart failure hospitalization. Despite the effective implementation of quadruple therapy, high mortality and rehospitalization rates persist in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, and many patients cannot maximize therapy due to side effects such as hypotension and renal dysfunction. In this context, ivabradine, vericiguat, and omecamtiv mecarbil may have adjunct roles in addition to quadruple therapy (note that omecamtiv mecarbil is not currently approved for clinical use). However, the contemporary use of ivabradine and vericiguat is relatively low globally, likely due in part to the under-recognition of the role of these therapies as well as costs. This review offers clinicians a straightforward guide for bedside evaluation of potential candidates for these medications. Quadruple therapy, with strong evidence to reduce mortality, should always be prioritized for implementation. As second-line therapies, ivabradine could be considered for patients who cannot achieve optimal heart rate control (≥ 70 bpm at rest) despite maximally tolerated beta-blocker dosing. Vericiguat could be considered for high-risk patients who have recently experienced worsening heart failure events despite being on quadrable therapy, but they should not have N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide levels exceeding 8000 pg/mL. In the future, omecamtiv mecarbil may be considered for severe heart failure (New York Heart Association class III to IV, ejection fraction ≤ 30%, and heart failure hospitalization within 6 months) when current quadrable therapy is limited, although this is still hypothesis-generating and requires further investigation before its approval.

Verification of haemoglobin level to prevent worsening of prognosis in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction patients from the PURSUIT-HFpEF registry.

AIMS: Anaemia has been reported as poor predictor in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of changes in haemoglobin (Hb) from discharge to 1 year after discharge on the prognosis using a lower cut-off value of Hb than the World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. METHODS AND RESULTS: First, 547 HFpEF cases were divided into two groups, Hb < 11.0 g/dL (n = 218) and Hb ≥ 11.0 g/dL (n = 329), according to Hb at discharge, and further were divided according to Hb 1 year after discharge into Hb < 11.0 g/dL (G1, n = 113), Hb ≥ 11.0 g/dL (G2, n = 105), Hb < 11.0 g/dL (G3, n = 66), and Hb ≥ 11.0 g/dL (G4, n = 263), respectively. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) was defined as composite of all-cause death and heart failure readmission after a visit 1 year after discharge. The cut-off value of Hb was analysed by the receiver operating characteristics curve that predicts MACE. We examined the incidence rate of MACE between G4 and other subgroups and verified predictors of improving or worsening anaemia and covarying factors with change in Hb. In multivariate Cox proportional hazard model, MACE was significantly higher in G3 with worsening anaemia from Hb ≥ 11.0 g/dL to <11.0 g/dL than G4 with persistently Hb ≥ 11 g/dL (adjusted hazard ratio (HR): 3.14 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.76-5.60], P < 0.001). MACE was not significantly different between G2 with improving anaemia from Hb < 11.0 g/dL to ≥ 11.0 g/dL and G4 (adjusted HR: 1.37 [95% CI, 0.68-2.75], P = 0.38). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, independent predictors of improving anaemia were male [odds ratio (OR): 0.45], chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR: 10.3), prior heart failure hospitalization (OR: 0.38), and estimated glomerular filtration rate (OR: 1.04). Independent predictors of worsening anaemia were age (OR: 1.07), body mass index (BMI) (OR: 0.86), clinical frailty scale score (OR: 1.29), Hb at discharge (OR: 0.63), and use of angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin II receptor blocker (OR: 2.76). In multivariate linear regression analysis, covarying factors with change in Hb were BMI (ß = -0.098), serum albumin (ß = 0.411), and total cholesterol (ß = 0.179). CONCLUSIONS: Change in haemoglobin after discharge using a lower cut-off value than WHO criteria has prognostic impact in patients with HFpEF.

Predictive value of early-phase heart rate reduction for subsequent recovery of left ventricular systolic function in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.

INTRODUCTION: Predictors of heart failure with recovered ejection fraction (HFrecEF) remain to be fully elucidated. This study investigated the impact of heart rate and its change on the recovery of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). MATERIAL AND METHODS: From 398 outpatients who had a history of hospitalisation for heart failure, 138 subjects diagnosed as HFrEF (LVEF < 40%) on heart failure hospitalisation were enrolled and longitudinally surveyed. During follow-up periods more than one year, 64 and 46 patients were identified as HFrecEF (improved LVEF to ≥ 40% and its increase of ≥ 10 points) and persistent HFrEF, respectively. RESULTS: In the overall subjects, the reduction of heart rate through the observation periods was closely correlated with the improvement of LVEF (r = -0.508, p < 0.001). Heart rate on hospital admission for heart failure was markedly higher in patients with HFrecEF (112 ± 26 bpm) than in those with persistent HFrEF (90±18 bpm). Whereas heart rate at the first outpatient visit after discharge was already lower in the HFrecEF group (80 ± 13 vs. 85 ± 13 bpm in the persistent HFrEF group). A multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the decrease in heart rate from admission to the first visit after discharge was a significant determinant of HFrecEF (p < 0.001), independently of confounding factors such as ischemic heart disease and baseline LVEF and left ventricular dimension. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that heart rate reduction in the early phase after heart failure onset is a powerful independent predictor of the subsequent recovery of LVEF in HFrEF patients.

Non-invasive pulse arrival time is associated with cardiac index in pediatric heart transplant patients with normal ejection fraction.

OBJECTIVE: Cardiac Index (CI) is a key physiologic parameter to ensure end organ perfusion in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). Determination of CI requires invasive cardiac measurements and is not routinely done at the PICU bedside. To date, there is no gold standard non-invasive means to determine CI. This study aims to use a novel non-invasive methodology, based on routine continuous physiologic data, called Pulse Arrival Time (PAT) as a surrogate for CI in patients with normal Ejection Fraction. Approach: Electrocardiogram (ECG) and photoplethysmogram (PPG) signals were collected from beside monitors at a sampling frequency of 250 samples per second. Continuous PAT, derived from the ECG and PPG waveforms was averaged per patient. Pearson's correlation coefficient was calculated between PAT and CI, PAT and heart rate (HR), and PAT and ejection fraction (EF). Main Results: Twenty patients underwent right heart cardiac catheterization. The mean age of patients was 11.7±5.4 years old, ranging from 11 months old to 19 years old, the median age was 13.4 years old. HR in this cohort was 93.8±17.0 beats per minute. The average EF was 54.4±9.6%. The average CI was 3.51±0.72 L/min/m2, with ranging from 2.6 to 4.77 L/min/m2. The average PAT was 0.31±0.12 seconds. Pearson correlation analysis showed a positive correlation between PAT and CI (0.57, p < 0.01). Pearson correlation between HR and CI, and correlation between EF and CI was 0.22 (p = 0.35) and 0.03 (p = 0.23) respectively. The correlation between PAT, when indexed by HR (i.e. PAT × HR), and CI minimally improved to 0.58 (p < 0.01). Significance: This pilot study demonstrates that PAT may serve as a valuable surrogate marker for CI at the bedside, as a non-invasive and continuous modality in the PICU. The use of PAT in clinical practice remains to be thoroughly investigated. .

Performance and failure of right ventricle to pulmonary artery conduit in congenital heart disease.

INTRODUCTION: Surgical implantation of a right ventricle to pulmonary artery (RV-PA) conduit is an important component of congenital heart disease (CHD) surgery but with limited durability leading to re-intervention. Current single-center, retrospective, cohort study is reporting results of surgically implanted RV-PA conduits in a consecutive series of children and adults with CHD. METHODS: Patients with CHD referred for RV-PA conduits surgical implantation (October 1997 and January 2022) have been included. Primary outcome was conduit failure defined as peak gradient above 64mmHg/severe regurgitation/need for conduit-related interventions. Longitudinal echocardiographic studies were available for mixed-effect linear regression analysis. RESULTS: Two-hundred and fifty-two patients were initially included. One hundred and forty-nine patients were elegible for follow-up data collection. After a median follow-up time of 49 months the primary study endpoint occurred in 44 (29%) patients. Multivariable Cox regression model identified adult age (>18 years) at implantation and pulmonary homograft as protective factors (HR 0.11, 95% CI 0.02-0.47 and HR 0.34, 95% CI 0.16-0.74, respectively). Fever within 7 days of surgical conduit implantation was a risk factor for early (within 24 months) failure (OR 4.29, 95% CI 1.41-13.01). Longterm use of oral anticoagulant was independently associated with slower progression of peak echocardiographic gradient across conduits (mixed effect linear regression p-value 0.027). CONCLUSION: In patients with CHD, surgically implanted RV-PA conduit failure is faster in children and after non-homograft conduit implantation. Early fever after surgery is a strong risk factor for early failure. Longterm anticoagulation seems to exert a protective effect.

Exercise training improves exercise capacity and quality of life in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Aims: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is associated with high morbidity and mortality, and there are limited proven therapeutic strategies. Exercise has been shown to be beneficial in several studies. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of exercise on functional, physiological, and quality-of-life measures. Methods and results: A comprehensive search of Medline and Embase was performed. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of adult HFpEF patients with data on exercise intervention were included. Using meta-analysis, we produced pooled mean difference (MD) estimates with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) with Review Manager (RevMan) software for the peak oxygen uptake (VO2), Minnesota living with heart failure (MLWHF) and, other diastolic dysfunction scores. A total of 14 studies on 629 HFpEF patients were included (63.2% female) with a mean age of 68.1 years. Exercise was associated with a significant improvement in the peak VO2 (MD 1.96 mL/kg/min, 95% CI 1.25-2.68; P < 0.00001) and MLWHF score (MD -12.06, 95% CI -17.11 to -7.01; P < 0.00001) in HFpEF. Subgroup analysis showed a small but significant improvement in peak VO2 with high-intensity interval training (HIIT) vs. medium-intensity continuous exercise (MCT; MD 1.25 mL/kg/min, 95% CI 0.41-2.08, P = 0.003). Conclusion: Exercise increases the exercise capacity and quality of life in HFpEF patients, and high-intensity exercise is associated with a small but statistically significant improvement in exercise capacity than moderate intensity. Further studies with larger participant populations and longer follow-up are needed to confirm these findings and elucidate potential differences between high- and medium-intensity exercise.