Comparison between endoscopic mucosal resection with a cap and endoscopic submucosal dissection for rectal neuroendocrine tumors.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare the safety and efficacy of endoscopic mucosal resection with a cap (EMR-c) with those of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for rectal neuroendocrine tumors (R-NETs) ≤ 15 mm in diameter, and to analyze the risk factors of incomplete resection. METHODS: A total of 122 patients who underwent EMR-c or ESD for R-NETs at the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University between February 2007 and December 2020 were invovled in this study. The clinical outcomes of two groups were compared and evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 122 patients with 128 R-NETs underwent endoscopic resection (EMR-c, 80; ESD, 48). In terms of duration of operation, EMR-c was significantly shorter than ESD (p < 0.001). Univariate analysis and multivariate analysis suggested that tumor diameter ≥ 8 mm was an independent risk factor for incomplete resection in patients with R-NETs in this study. CONCLUSIONS: Both EMR-c and ESD were safe and effective treatments for R-NETs ≤ 15 mm in diameter. In addition, tumor diameter ≥ 8 mm was an independent risk factor for incomplete resection.

Simple scoring system for the diagnosis of superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Differentiating superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors (SNADETs) that harbor malignant potential is important. We developed a simple scoring system and investigated whether it enables the differentiation of low-grade adenoma and high-grade adenoma/adenocarcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively enrolled 197 consecutive patients with 207 SNADETs who underwent endoscopic resection at NTT Medical Center Tokyo between March 2016 and May 2019. Endoscopic findings were compared between Vienna Classification (VCL) C3 and C4/5 lesions. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to develop a scoring system to identify VCL C4/5 lesions. The efficacy of our scoring system was elucidated among five novice and five expert endoscopists. RESULTS: Of 207 SNADETs, 66 and 141 lesions were pathologically diagnosed as VCL C3 and C4/5. A multivariate logistic regression analysis identified a tumor diameter of 10-19 mm (OR, 3.81; 95% CI, 1.02-14.2; P = 0.04), a tumor diameter ≥20 mm (OR, 95.2; 95% CI, 10.4-871.0; P < 0.001), a red color (OR, 14.5; 95% CI, 3.55-59.6; P < 0.001), the presence of irregular surface pattern (OR, 12.4; 95% CI, 3.00-51.4; P < 0.001), and the presence of irregular vessel pattern (OR, 13.7; 95% CI, 4.03-46.6; P < 0.001) as independent significant predictors of VCL C4/5. Considering these results, we developed a scoring system. Using an appropriate cutoff value, the diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity and specificity were calculated as 92%, 95% and 93%. The average diagnostic accuracy did not differ between novice and expert endoscopists (86% vs 87%, P = 0.76). CONCLUSIONS: Our scoring system was useful for differentiating VCL C3 and C4/5 lesions. UMIN Clinical Trials (No. 000039063).

Risk factors of delayed bleeding after endoscopic resection of superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors and prevention by over-the-scope and conventional clipping.

OBJECTIVES: This study was aimed to reveal risk factors for delayed bleeding after endoscopic resection (ER) of superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors (SNADETs) and at exploring measures to prevent this complication. METHODS: A total of 235 consecutive patients with 249 SNADETs who had undergone ER were enrolled in this study. They were divided into two groups: OTSC group, consisting of the initial 114 cases in which the defects were closed only using OTSCs; and OTSC-c group, consisting of the later 135 cases in which conventional clips were additionally used to cover the inverted submucosa after post-procedure defect closure using OTSCs. The therapeutic outcomes were then compared between the OTSC and OTSC-c groups. RESULTS: All lesions were successfully resected en-bloc, and the R0 resection rate was 92.4%. The complete defect closure rate was 90.0% and no delayed perforation occurred when successful defect closure was achieved. The rate of delayed bleeding was significantly higher in the OTSC group than in OTSC-c group (11.4% vs. 1.5%, P = 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analyses revealed that tumor location distal to the ampulla (OR 10.0; 95% CI 1.24-81.0, P = 0.03) and use of a DOAC (OR 8.83; 95% CI 1.13-68.7, P = 0.04) were significant independent predictors of delayed bleeding. Propensity score-matching analysis revealed that additional use of conventional clips was associated with a significantly reduced risk of delayed bleeding (P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Additional use of conventional clips after prophylactic defect closure using OTSCs appears to be useful to reduce the risk of delayed bleeding after ER of SNADETs. UMIN Clinical Trials (No. 000035478).

Comparison of endoscopic mucosal resection with a cap and endoscopic submucosal dissection in the treatment of smaller gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms / 中华消化内镜杂志

Data of 55 cases of gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms (G-NENS) with diameter ≤12 mm in the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from August 2014 to August 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the methods of endoscopic resection, the patients were divided into two groups: the endoscopic mucosal resection with a cap (EMR-C) group (35 cases) and the endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) group (20 cases). The results showed that the success rates of operation, the whole resection rates and the complete resection rates were all 100.0% in the two groups. Compared with the ESD group, the EMR-C group had a shorter median operation time (12.00 min VS 28.35 min, P<0.001), less mean hospitalization costs (21 165.19 yuan VS 28 400.35 yuan, P=0.004), and a similar overall incidence of complications [2.86% (1/35) VS 0, P=1.000]. By March 2020, the recurrence rate of EMR-C group and ESD group were 28.6% (10/35) and 15.0% (3/20), respectively, without significant difference ( P=0.418). It is suggested that for G-NENS with diameter ≤12 mm, without muscular invasion, lymph node metastasis or distant metastasis, EMR-C and ESD are both safe and effective, but EMR-C has more advantages in terms of operation time and hospitalization costs.