Predictors for reintervention and survival during long-term follow-up after TEVAR for descending thoracic aortic aneurysm.

BACKGROUND: Several studies have reported short- and intermediate-term outcomes after TEVAR for descending thoracic aortic aneurysm (DTAA), however, reports on long-term (10 years) outcomes are sparse. Therefore, the aim of this study was to analyze predictors impacting long-term outcome following thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for DTAA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Databases from four academic institutions were reviewed and consecutive cases of TEVAR for DTAA between 1999 and 2021 were included in this retrospective multicenter study (Case series). Ethical approval from Institutional review board was obtained and patient demographics, treatment data as well as follow-up information were retrieved and analyzed. RESULTS: 305 patients (mean age 72±10 years) treated with TEVAR for degenerative DTAA with mean aortic diameter of 64mm were identified. Altogether 445 endografts were implanted via femoral access (93%) with a technical success of 94%. Operative mortality, stroke rate and rate of spinal cord ischemia were 6% (5% for intact, 12% for ruptured DTAA), 4% and 3%, respectively. Kaplan-Meier estimates for overall survival rates were 76%, 59% and 34% at 1, 5 and 10 years and freedom from reintervention rates were 84%, 73% and 58% at 1, 5 and 10 years, respectively. In multivariate analysis, ASA grade 3-5 and non-elective case were identified as predictors for death, wheres as fusiform DTAA, proximal landing zone 2 and hypertension but not device generation were predictive for reintervention. CONCLUSION: This is to date the largest study reporting long-term (10 years) outcome on TEVAR for DTAA. We found acceptable rates for long-term survival and freedom-from reintervention that were independent of endovascular device generation.

The Impact of Revascularization Strategy on Clinical Failure, Hemodynamic Failure and Chronic Limb Threatening Ischemia Symptoms in the BEST-CLI Trial.

OBJECTIVES: Sustained clinical and hemodynamic benefit following revascularization for chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) is needed to resolve symptoms and prevent limb loss. We sought to compare rates of clinical and hemodynamic failure as well as resolution of initial and prevention of recurrent CLTI following endovascular (ENDO) vs bypass (OPEN) revascularization in the BEST-CLI trial. METHODS: As planned secondary analyses of the BEST-CLI trial, we examined the rates of A) clinical failure (a composite of all-cause death, above-ankle amputation, major reintervention, and degradation of WIfI stage); B) hemodynamic failure (a composite of above-ankle amputation, major and minor reintervention to maintain index limb patency, failure to initially increase or a subsequent decrease in ankle brachial index of 0.15 or toe brachial index of 0.10, and radiographic evidence of treatment stenosis or occlusion); C) time to resolution of presenting CLTI symptoms; and D) incidence of recurrent CLTI. Time-to-event analyses were by intention-to-treat assignment in both trial cohorts (cohort 1: suitable single segment great saphenous vein [SSGSV], N=1434; cohort 2: lacking suitable SSGSV, N= 396) and multivariate stratified Cox regression models were created. RESULTS: In cohort 1, there was a significant difference in time to clinical failure (log-rank p<0.001), hemodynamic failure (log-rank p<0.001), and resolution of presenting symptoms (log-rank p=0.009) in favor of OPEN. In cohort 2, there was a significantly lower rate of hemodynamic failure (log-rank p=0.006) favoring OPEN, and no significant difference in time to clinical failure or resolution of presenting symptoms. Multivariate analysis revealed that assignment to OPEN was associated with significantly lower risk of clinical and hemodynamic failure in both cohorts, and a significantly higher likelihood of resolving initial and preventing recurrent CLTI symptoms in cohort 1, including after adjustment for key baseline patient covariates (end stage renal disease (ESRD), prior revascularization, smoking, diabetes, age>80, WIfI stage, tissue loss, infrapopliteal disease). Factors independently associated with clinical failure included age>80 in cohort 1 and ESRD across both cohorts. ESRD was associated with hemodynamic failure in cohort 1. Factors associated with slower resolution of presenting symptoms included diabetes in cohort 1 and WIfI stage in cohort 2. CONCLUSIONS: Durable clinical and hemodynamic benefit following revascularization for CLTI is important to avoid persistent and recurrent CLTI, reinterventions and limb loss. When compared with ENDO, initial treatment with OPEN surgical bypass, particularly with available saphenous vein, is associated with improved clinical and hemodynamic outcomes and enhanced resolution of CLTI symptoms.

Endovascular Revascularization versus Open Surgical Revascularization as the First Strategy for Arterial Acute Mesenteric Ischemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This paired meta-analysis aimed to compare the mortality and morbidity of endovascular revascularization (EVR) and open surgical revascularization (OSR) as the first strategy for arterial acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI). METHODS: This systematic review and meta-analysis were performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. A systematic search strategy was performed to identify eligible studies using the following databases: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library database from inception to December 31, 2023, with restriction to the English language, and the end search date was January 2, 2024. The primary outcome was short-term mortality. Secondary outcomes included bowel resection, second-look laparotomy, and short bowel syndrome (SBS). The counter-enhanced funnel plot and the Peters test were used to assess bias. Outcomes were reported as odds ratio (OR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) using the Mantel-Haenszel method. The GRADE classification was utilized to estimate the certainty of evidence. RESULTS: A total of 11 studies (1141 patients) comparing EVR versus OSR for arterial AMI were identified and analyzed. The mean age of 61.9 - 73.6 years and 45.1% of the patients were male. Compared with OSR, EVR as the first treatment may not reduce short-term mortality (OR 0.79; 95% CI, 0.50-1.25; p = 0.31; very low certainty) and second-look laparotomy (OR 1.00; 95% CI, 0.30-3.36; p = 0.99; very low certainty). However, EVR may be associated with reduced bowel resection (OR 0.42; 95% CI, 0.20-0.88; p = 0.022; very low certainty) and SBS (OR 0.39; 95% CI, 0.21-0.75; p = 0.005; very low certainty). The meta-regression revealed that the mortality regarding EVR versus OSR was not significantly impacted by thrombotic etiology (-0.002; 95% CI, -0.027 to 0.022, p = 0.85), whereas significantly impacted by the publication year (0.076; 95% CI, 0.069 to 0.145, p = 0.031). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with OSR, EVR as the first treatment for arterial AMI may not reduce short-term mortality and second-look laparotomy. Future multicenter randomized controlled trials are urgently needed to confirm these results.

A Combination Technique of N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate and Minimal Coils with Flow Control for Parent Artery Occlusion of a Giant Internal Carotid Artery Aneurysm: A Technical Note.

Parent artery occlusion for large or giant internal carotid artery aneurysms remains a necessary procedure in the era of flow diverters. Endovascular parent artery occlusion is currently performed using detachable balloons or coils, which are difficult to obtain or costly. At our institution, we have devised a technique for combining n-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate and coils with flow control to solve this problem. Patients who underwent parent artery occlusion for large or giant internal carotid artery aneurysms with a follow-up period of more than 12 months were included. Imaging outcomes were evaluated for complete or incomplete aneurysmal occlusion and with or without aneurysmal shrinkage. The clinical outcome was based on changes in the modified Rankin Scale. Ten patients (ten aneurysms) were included. Their average age and average follow-up period were 68.4 years and 36 months, respectively. Complete occlusion and favorable clinical outcome were observed in all cases. The parent artery occlusion using a combination of coils and n-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate with flow control technique is effective for both imaging and clinical outcomes.

Clinical Comparison of Drug-Coated Balloon and Drug-Eluting Stent for Femoropopliteal Lesions in Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia With Wounds.

BACKGROUND: Endovascular therapy (EVT) with devices such as drug-coated balloons (DCBs) and drug-eluting stents (DESs) for atherosclerotic disease in the femoropopliteal (FP) artery has been established. However, EVT using drug-based devices for chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) remains challenging. The optimal device for FP lesions in patients with CLTI remains unknown. This study compared the clinical efficacy of DCB and DES in patients with CLTI and FP lesions.Methods and Results: This retrospective single-center study included 539 consecutive patients (562 lesions) treated with EVT between January 2018 and December 2022; 166 patients with CLTI and Rutherford Class 5 or 6 wounds underwent EVT with DCB or DES. Clinical outcomes were compared between 53 pairs after propensity score matching. There were no significant differences between the DCB and DES groups in the incidence of complete wound healing without death or major amputation (84.8% vs. 80.2%, respectively; P=0.99), primary patency (69.4% vs. 75.6%, respectively; P=0.65), and freedom from target lesion revascularization at 1 year (78.6% vs. 78.0%, respectively; P=0.92). Multivariate analysis showed that complete wound healing at 1 year is negatively associated with hemodialysis and Wound, Ischemia, and foot Infection Stage 4, but positively associated with Global Limb Anatomic Staging System FP Grade 3 or 4. CONCLUSIONS: No significant differences in clinical outcomes were found between DCB and DES for patients with CLTI and FP lesions.

Endovascular repair of bilateral common iliac artery aneurysms using intraoperative positioning system.

Intraoperative positioning system (IOPS; Centerline Biomedical, Inc) is a novel technology that allows for real-time intravascular navigation of endovascular devices using an electromagnetic field. In this report, we describe the use of IOPS for effective treatment of bilateral common iliac artery aneurysms with endovascular aortoiliac repair using iliac branch endoprostheses. Our experience suggests that this technology has the potential to reduce radiation and contrast use in endovascular procedures, although its application is currently limited. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first reported case of bilateral internal iliac cannulations for iliac branch endoprosthesis placement using IOPS.

Anaphylactoid reactions during implantation of polymer-filled ring stent grafts for treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Polymer ring stent grafts from Endologix are reliable to treat challenging abdominal aortic aneurysm anatomy (hostile neck and tortuous or narrow iliac arteries). Rare cases of anaphylactoid reactions have been reported during the filing time of the graft rings due to polymer leakage. Management with amines, an antihistamine drug, and supportive care quickly stabilized both of our patients, which permitted the continuation and completion of their surgery. In our experience, there was no death-related events nor negative impact on patients surgical and clinical outcomes. We report on polymer leakage using the Ovation IX and ALTO stent grafts resulting in an anaphylactoid reaction.

Intermediate catheter use is associated with intraprocedural rupture during coil embolization of ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a retrospective propensity score-matched study.

Introduction: An intermediate catheter (IMC) may pose a risk of intraprocedural rupture (IPR) during coil embolization of ruptured intracranial aneurysms (RIAs), because the pressure on the microcatheter and coil might be more direct. To verify this hypothesis, this study explored whether use of an IMC might correlate with an increased rate of IPR during coil embolization for RIAs. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 195 consecutive aneurysms in 192 patients who underwent initial coil embolization for saccular RIAs at our institution between January 2007 and December 2023. Patients were divided into two groups with aneurysms treated either with an IMC (IMC group) or without an IMC (non-IMC group). To investigate whether IMC use increased the rate of IPR, a propensity score-matched analysis was employed to control for age, sex, maximal aneurysm size, neck size, bleb formation, aneurysm location, proximal vessel tortuosity, balloon-assisted coiling, type of microcatheter, and type of framing coil. Results: Ultimately, 43 (22%) coil embolization used IMC. In univariate analysis, the incidence of IPR was significantly higher in the IMC group compared with the non-IMC group (14.0 vs. 3.3%, p = 0.016). Propensity score matching was successful for pairs of 26 aneurysms in the IMC group and 52 aneurysms in the non-IMC group. The incidence of IPR was still significantly higher in the IMC group than in the non-IMC group (23.1 vs. 3.8%, p = 0.015). No significant differences in the incidences of ischemic complications and IMC-related parent artery dissection were observed between the two groups. Discussion: When using IMC for coil embolization of RIAs, the surgeons should be more careful and delicate in manipulating the microcatheter and inserting the coils to avoid IPR.

Multi-organ Thromboembolic Crisis: A Case Report of Concomitant Stroke, Myocardial Infarction, and Pulmonary Embolism.

Management of acute coronary syndrome (ACS), cerebrovascular accident (CVA), and pulmonary embolism (PE) necessitates prompt intervention, as delayed treatment may lead to severe consequences. Each of these conditions presents significant challenges and carries a high risk of morbidity and mortality. We present the case of an 86-year-old female with a history of stage 4 urothelial carcinoma metastasized to the lungs, who presented to the emergency department (ED) with acute ischemic stroke (AIS), ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), and bilateral PE. We propose the term "multi-organ thromboembolic crisis" (MOTEC) to streamline the communication and management approach for patients experiencing critical thromboembolic events affecting multiple organ systems.

Outcomes of Endovascular Aneurysm Repair (EVAR) Compared to Open Repair in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: An Umbrella Meta-Analysis.

This umbrella meta-analysis aims to investigate two surgical treatments for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA): endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) and open surgery repair (OSR). Our study aims to elucidate the 30-day mortality rate, reintervention rates, and aneurysm-related mortality in EVAR versus OSR for AAA.  We conducted a comprehensive assessment of meta-analyses (n = 34 articles) comparing EVAR and OSR for AAA. We adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) protocol and considered statistical significance at P ≤ 0.05. For the 30-day mortality rate, a pooled odds ratio (pOR) of 0.59 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.45-0.77, P = 0.0001, and I2 = 98%) indicates that EVAR was associated with a lower risk of mortality compared to OSR. For reintervention rates, a pOR of 1.33 (95% CI = 0.98-1.82, P = 0.11, and I2 = 90%). In aneurysm-related mortality, a pOR of 0.78 (95% CI = 0.63-0.97, P = 0.03, and I2 = 43%). In postoperative rupture of aneurysm, a pOR of 3.28 (95% CI = 2.16-4.98, P < 0.00001, and I2 = 50%). Furthermore, when analyzing systemic complications, only for visceral ischemia, significant results showed lower odds for EVAR, with a pOR of 0.57 (95% CI = 0.40-0.80, P = 0.001, and I2 = 0%) was found.  EVAR is better in terms of short-term mortality rate and aneurysm-related mortality. Furthermore, EVAR is still a safer procedure in elective settings, as the studies we included recruited patients for this setting. However, given the high reintervention rates and recent developments in surgical techniques and materials, more recent data and extensive research are needed.

Delivery-First Strategy Followed by Endovascular Repair to Treat Pregnant Woman With Acute Complicated Type B Aortic Dissection.

Objective: Aortic dissection, a rare but serious condition, requires timely diagnosis and treatment. Case report: A case report involving a 33-year-old female with Stanford type B aortic dissection at 32 + 3 weeks gestational age highlights the importance of being alert to the symptoms and signs of this condition, particularly in patients with hypertension or a history of connective tissue disorders. The case report suggests a delivery first strategy followed by TEVAR procedure as the preferred approach for managing aortic dissection in pregnancy. This approach can alleviate pressure on the aorta, reduce the risk of rupture, and provide time for stabilization and preparation for the TEVAR procedure. Conclusion: The case report emphasizes the criticality of recognizing and treating aortic dissection in pregnant patients promptly, given its potential life-threatening impact on both mother and fetus.

Management of Thrombosis in a Patient with Three Thrombophilic Disorders.

Combined thrombophilia represents 7.8-8.3% of the patients with thrombophilia and confers a higher risk for thrombosis development and recurrence. Here, we present a 17-year-old boy carrier of three congenital thrombophilias, two severe (type I antithrombin deficiency and type I protein S deficiency) and one prothrombotic polymorphism (prothrombin G20210A), all in heterozygosis. He developed an extensive deep venous thrombosis in lower left limb, reaching proximal inferior vena cava and contralateral iliac vein, in the setting of prolonged rest. Endovascular therapy with local thrombolytic agent infusion followed by mechanical thrombectomy was performed, achieving a favorable clinical and radiological evolution. Antithrombin replacement to achieve levels between 80% and 120% with heparin administration was used during the endovascular procedure. The patient is currently asymptomatic and maintains indefinite anticoagulation with warfarin, keeping an appropriate anticoagulation range (international normalized range between 2.5 and 3.5).

A Huge High-Flow Aneurysmal Renal Arteriovenous Malformation Treated With Endovascular Transcatheter Embolization.

Renal arteriovenous anomalies are uncommon. They are characterized by an abnormal vascular connection that usually bypasses the capillary bed. Most are acquired arteriovenous fistulas (AVF) while the rest are congenital or idiopathic arteriovenous malformations (AVM). AVF are usually caused by renal interventions, trauma, or neoplastic processes. They can lead to hypertension, heart failure, hematuria, and renal insufficiency. A 69-year-old woman presented with arrhythmia, tachycardia, mild ankle edema, and increasing fatigue. Right kidney color Doppler ultrasound confirmed the presence of a huge AVM with a blood flow of 9 L/minute and a dilated, 35 mm in diameter, right renal vein. Two months later, an attempt to embolize the AVM failed as the Amplatzer™ Vascular Plug II (Abbott Laboratories, Chicago, Illinois, United States) migrated to the pulmonary circulation and was later removed. Complete embolization was achieved by implanting two Amplatzer Vascular Plug IIs, various embolization coils, histoacryl glue, and lipiodol. Control angiography revealed significant stenosis in the right subclavian artery endovascular access, which was managed with BeGraft (Bentley InnoMed GmbH, Hechingen, Germany) and Zilver (Cook Group Incorporated, Bloomington, Indiana, United States) stents. The patient was discharged on the third postoperative day, all her symptoms resolved, and she reported eventual recovery. Three months later, the patient was operated on due to a 40x58 mm pseudoaneurysm at the right femoral access site. Thus, renal AVMs should be included as a potential alternative diagnosis for various symptoms such as hematuria and hypertension resistant to medication. Endovascular embolization is a less-invasive, safer, and more effective option than open surgery but has a risk of complications. Success requires fully occluding the shunted vessel, preventing embolic material migration, and preserving normal arterial branches. It depends on selecting adequate techniques and embolic materials individually, based on etiology and precise vascular anatomy assessment.

Microsurgical and endovascular treatment of large and giant aneurysms of the anterior circulation: A systematic review.

Introduction: Large and Giant intracranial aneurysms (LGIAs) have become the paradigm for which endovascular techniques do not provide satisfactory results. Yet, microsurgery is followed by non-negligible rates of morbimortality. This scenario may have changed since the introduction of flow-diversion devices. Research question: Contemporary and standardised revision on microsurgical and endovascular results, with emphasis on anterior circulation LGIAs. Materials and methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in two databases (PubMed and Embase) on treatment outcomes of LGIAs of the anterior circulation, after the introduction of flow-diverters 2008/01/01, till 2023/05/20. Small case series (<5 cases), series including >15% of posterior circulation aneurysms, and studies not reporting clinical and/or angiographic outcomes were excluded. Results: 44 relevant studies (observational cohorts) were identified, including 2923 LGIAs predominantly from anterior circulation. Mean follow-up 22 (±20) months. 1494 (51%) LGIAs were treated endovascularly and 1427 (49%) microsurgically. According to the random effects model, pooled rates of favourable clinical outcomes were 85.8% (CI 95% 82.6-88.4), complete occlusion 69.4% (CI 95% 63.7-7.46), complications 19.6% (CI 95%16-23.9) and mortality 5.6% (CI 95% 4.4-7.1). Focusing on type of treatment, occlusion rates are higher with microsurgical (842/993, 85% vs 874/1,299, 67%), although good outcomes are slightly more frequent with endovascular (1045/1,135, 92% vs 1120/1,294, 87%). Discussion and conclusions: According to contemporary data about occlusion rates, functional outcomes, and complications, primary or secondary treatment of LGIAs of the anterior circulation seems justified. Microsurgical occlusion rates are higher in LGIAs. An expert consensus on reporting complications and management strategies is warranted.

Differentiation of Acute Internal Carotid Artery Occlusion Etiology on Computed Tomography Angiography: Diagnostic Tree for Preparing Endovascular Treatment.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: This study aimed to identify the imaging characteristics and discriminate the etiology of acute internal carotid artery occlusion (ICAO) on computed tomography angiography (CTA) in patients with acute ischemic stroke. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated consecutive patients who underwent endovascular thrombectomy for acute ICAO. Contrast filling of the extracranial ICA in preprocedural CTA was considered apparent ICAO. Non-contrast filling of the extracranial ICA was evaluated according to the contrast-filled lumen configuration, lumen margin and location, Hounsfield units of the non-attenuating segment, and presence of calcification or an intimal flap. Digital subtraction angiography findings were the reference standard for ICAO etiology and the occlusion site. A diagnostic tree was derived using significant variables according to pseudo-occlusion, atherosclerotic vascular disease (ASVD), thrombotic occlusion, and dissection. RESULTS: A total of 114 patients showed apparent ICAO (n = 21), pseudo-occlusion (n = 51), ASVD (n = 27), thrombotic occlusion (n = 9), or dissection (n = 6). Most pseudo-occlusions (50/51, 98.0%) showed dependent locations with ill-defined contrast column margins and classic flame or beak shapes. The most common occlusion site of pseudo-occlusion was the petro-cavernous ICA (n = 32, 62.7%). Apparent ICAO mainly appeared in cases with occlusion distal to the posterior communicating artery orifice. ASVD showed beak or blunt shapes in the presence of low-density plaques or dense calcifications. Dissection revealed flame- or beak-shaped appearances with circumscribed margins. Thrombotic occlusions tended to appear blunt-shaped. The decision-tree model showed a 92.5% overall accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: CTA characteristics may help diagnose ICAO etiology. We provide a simple and easy decision-making model to inform endovascular thrombectomy.

Perianeurysmal vasogenic oedema (PAVO): A single centre 10-year retrospective review.

INTRODUCTION: Perianeurysmal Vasogenic Oedema (PAVO) is a rare but important complication of endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Many potential risk factors have been identified including age, aneurysm size, aneurysm location, immunological profile, type of coil used, diabetes, hypertension, and smoking. PAVO can cause persistent post-procedural symptoms, subsequently increasing post-embolization morbidity. METHODS: A 10-year retrospective review was conducted between 2011 and 2021 at Royal Preston Hospital, Preston, UK. RESULTS: We identified 8 patients that fit our inclusion criteria. This included 6 (75%) females and 2 (25%) males. The mean age was 64. All patients had anterior circulation aneurysms with the middle cerebral artery (MCA) being the most common site. The mean aneurysm size was 12 mm. Our patients were managed with a range of endovascular techniques. One patient had pre-treatment PAVO while 7 patients had post-embolization PAVO. Five patients were symptomatic, and 3 cases were asymptomatic with only radiological evidence of PAVO. Five patients were managed with varying courses of dexamethasone. PAVO resolution was achieved in 4 cases. The oedema significantly improved in 3 cases, but transiently progressed in 1 case. CONCLUSIONS: PAVO is a rare but important complication of endovascular management of intracranial aneurysms. We have shown that patients can be effectively managed with steroids with resultant oedema regression and symptomatic improvement. Many risk factors have been associated with PAVO, but further research is needed to better understand their role in PAVO development and help develop other therapeutic options.

A case of dural arteriovenous fistula at the craniocervical junction successfully treated by transvenous embolization.

Arteriovenous fistula (AVF) occurring within the craniocervical junction (CCJ) is an uncommon vascular anomaly. A 56-year-old man presented with cervical pain and gait disturbances. Computed tomography revealed a hematoma in the epidural space at the cervical spinal level. Subsequent cerebral angiography revealed an epidural shunt at the CCJ, leading to a diagnosis of epidural AVF (EDAVF). Transvenous embolization, performed under general anesthesia, successfully resolved the shunt. Transarterial embolization of CCJ-EDAVFs carries a substantial risk of ischemic complications. Conversely, transvenous embolization poses a lower risk of ischemic complications and has potential as a beneficial treatment option for CCJ-EDAVFs. Herein, we present a unique case of CCJ-EDAVF that was successfully treated with transvenous embolization.

Surgical clipping and endovascular treatments for small or very small anterior communicating artery aneurysms: A comparative pooled analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Small and very small anterior communicating artery (ACoA) aneurysms pose a complex challenge in neurosurgery and interventional neuroradiology due to their critical location and potential for severe consequences upon rupture. Surgical clipping has been a traditional approach, but it presents challenges requiring precision and expertise. Endovascular treatment has emerged as an alternative, offering minimally invasive techniques with potential advantages. This study aims to comprehensively compare outcomes and efficacy between surgical clipping and endovascular treatment for small or very small ACoA aneurysms. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to perform a meta-analysis of small or very small anterior communicating artery aneurysms comparing surgical clipping and endovascular treatments. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted, including studies reporting on both treatment modalities. Eligible studies were identified through PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases. Pooled analyses with 95% confidence intervals were used to compare treatment effects, and statistical analysis followed PRISMA guidelines. RESULTS: Thirteen studies with 637 patients were included. Endovascular treatment, predominantly coiling, was performed in 60.3% of patients, while 39.7% underwent surgical management. Endovascular treatment exhibited an 18% retreatment rate, contrasting with 0% in the surgery group. Mortality rates were 3% and 6% for endovascular and surgical treatments, respectively. Overall complications occurred in 1.8% of patients, with intraoperative rupture and cerebral infarction being the most common. CONCLUSION: In summary, our study indicates a comparable outcome between surgical clipping and endovascular treatment for small ACoA aneurysms, with the former showing a lower retreatment rate. Decision factors include surgeon expertise, healthcare context, and patient age. Further research is needed to refine treatment strategies, considering variations in aneurysm status and evolving techniques.

Impact of Infrapopliteal Revascularisation Establishing In Line Flow to the Wound in Patients with Chronic Limb Threatening Ischaemia.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the impact of infrapopliteal (IP) revascularisation establishing in line flow to the wound (IFW) on wound healing in chronic limb threatening ischaemia (CLTI), using a core laboratory assessment for wounds and in line flow. METHODS: The Wound-directed Angiosome RevasculaRIzation apprOach to patients with cRitical limb iSchaemia (WARRIORS) multicentre observational study enrolled patients with CLTI with tissue loss undergoing IP revascularisation in Japan, with scheduled two year follow up. The primary outcome measure was complete wound healing, defined as achievement of complete epithelialisation of all wounds without major amputation. IP revascularisation establishing IFW was defined as revascularisation after which a tibiopedal artery that actually fed an injured pedal unit was patent. The incidence of wound healing was compared between the IFW and non-IFW groups using inverse probability of treatment weighting based on the propensity score. RESULTS: A total of 440 patients with CLTI (median age, 75 years; male, 64.1%; diabetes mellitus, 72.0%; dialysis, 57.7%) with tissue loss (Wound, Ischemia, and foot Infection stage 4, 66.4%) who underwent IP revascularisation (endovascular procedure, n = 304; bypass grafting, n = 136) between October 2017 and June 2020 were registered. During a median follow up of 23.6 months, 51.1% achieved wound healing. Successful IP revascularisation with IFW was achieved in 68.2%. After analysis, the IFW group had a higher incidence of wound healing than the non-IFW group (34.5 vs. 16.1 per 100 person years; p = .030). The association of IFW with wound healing was not statistically different between patients undergoing bypass grafting and those undergoing an endovascular procedure (p for interaction = .38). There was no statistically significant interaction effect between IFW and direct revascularisation for wound healing (p for interaction = .51). CONCLUSION: IP revascularisation establishing IFW was statistically significantly associated with a higher wound healing rate in patients with CLTI.

Preoperative and intraoperative tirofiban during endovascular thrombectomy in large vessel occlusion stroke due to large artery atherosclerosis.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to investigate the efficacy and safety of preoperative versus intraoperative tirofiban in patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) due to large artery atherosclerosis (LAA). METHODS: This is a retrospective multicenter cohort study based on the RESCUE-RE (Registration Study for Critical Care of Acute Ischemic Stroke After Recanalization) trial enrolling patients with anterior circulation LVO classified as LAA within 24 h of onset. Patients were divided into three groups: preoperative tirofiban (PT), intraoperative tirofiban (IT), and no tirofiban (NT). Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance baseline characteristics. The efficacy outcomes included 90-day functional independence (modified Rankin Scale score = 0-2) and early partial recanalization (EPR; defined as a modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score = 1-2a). The safety outcomes included symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH). RESULTS: A total of 104 matched triplets were obtained through PSM. Compared with NT, PT increased 90-day functional independence (60.8% vs. 42.3%, p = 0.008) and EPR (42.7% vs. 18.3%, p < 0.001) rate, with a tendency to increase the asymptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (aICH) proportion (28.8% vs. 18.3%, p = 0.072). Compared with IT, PT had a higher 90-day functional independence (60.8% vs. 45.2%, p = 0.025) and EPR (42.7% vs. 20.2%, p = 0.001) rate, with no significant difference in sICH (14.4% vs. 7.7%, p = 0.122) and aICH (28.8% vs. 21.2%, p = 0.200). Compared with NT, IT had a lower 90-day mortality rate (9.6% vs. 24.0%, p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Tirofiban shows good adjuvant therapy potential in acute ischemic stroke-LVO due to LAA patients. PT is associated with higher rates of EPR and better therapeutic efficacy. In addition, EPR may be a potential way to improve prognosis.