Monitorización de la glucemia en el paciente crítico adulto: tipo de muestra y método de análisis. Revisión sistemática y metanálisis / Blood glucose monitoring in critically ill adult patients: Type of sample and method of analysis. Systematic review and meta-analysis

IntroducciónLa guía clínica para el manejo de la sepsis recomienda usar muestras de sangre arterial para el control glucémico. Un estudio multicéntrico en 86 unidades de cuidados intensivos españolas reveló que el 85,4% de estas utilizaban punción capilar.ObjetivoAnalizar la fiabilidad de la glucemia comparando diferentes muestras sanguíneas (arterial, venosa, capilar) e instrumentos (glucómetros, gasómetros, laboratorio central). Secundariamente, estimar el efecto de variables confusoras y el rendimiento de los instrumentos de medición determinados por las diferentes normas de calidad.MetodologíaRevisión sistemática y metanálisis con búsqueda en las bases de datos PubMed, CINAHL y Embase en septiembre-2021 y septiembre-2022, sin límites temporales ni idiomáticos. Fuentes de literatura gris: DART-Europe, OpenGrey y Google Académico. Resultados resumidos mediante síntesis cualitativa (descripción de resultados, características de los estudios) y cuantitativa (metanálisis para evaluar la diferencia de medias estandarizadas). Calidad metodológica de artículos evaluada con Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2. Protocolo: https://osf.io/ DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/T8KYP.ResultadosSe incluyeron un total de 32 artículos y 5.451 pacientes. No se obtuvieron discrepancias entre muestras arteriales con glucómetro vs. laboratorio (sesgo [IC95%]: 0,01 [−0,12 a 0,14] mg/dL). En cambio, muestras arteriales con gasómetro sí sobreestimaron de forma significativa (sesgo [IC95%]: 0,12 [0,01 a 0,24] mg/dL). La misma tendencia presentan capilares con glucómetro, aunque no de forma significativa (sesgo [IC95%]: 0,07 [−0,02 a 0,15] mg/dL). Hay discrepancia entre los estudios sobre el efecto del hematocrito y el equilibrio ácido-base. El mayor consenso se da en la poca concordancia del glucómetro con muestras capilares vs. laboratorio en presencia de shock y soporte vasopresor, situación de fallo renal o durante el tratamiento con vitamina C.Conclusiones... (AU)

IntroductionThe clinical guideline for the management of sepsis recommends using arterial blood samples for glycaemic control. A multicentre study in 86 Spanish intensive care units revealed that 85.4% of these used capillary puncture.ObjectiveTo analyse the reliability of glycaemia by comparing different blood samples (arterial, venous, capillary) and instruments (glucometers, gasometers, central laboratory). Secondarily, to estimate the effect of confounding variables and the performance of measuring instruments as determined by different quality standards.MethodologySystematic review and meta-analysis with search in PubMed, CINAHL and Embase databases in September-2021 and September-2022, with no time or language limits. Grey literature sources: DART-Europe, OpenGrey and Google Scholar. Results summarised by qualitative (description of results, study characteristics) and quantitative (meta-analysis to assess standardised mean difference) synthesis. Methodological quality of articles assessed with Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2. Protocol: https://osf.io/ DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/T8KYP.ResultsA total of 32 articles and 5451 patients were included. No discrepancies were obtained between arterial glucometer vs. laboratory samples (bias [95%CI]: 0.01 [−0.12 to 0.14] mg/dL). In contrast, arterial samples with a gasometer did significantly overestimate (bias [95%CI]: 0.12 [0.01 to 0.24] mg/dL). The same trend is seen in capillaries with a glucometer, although not significantly (bias [95%CI]: 0.07 [−0.02 to 0.15] mg/dL). There is discrepancy between studies on the effect of haematocrit and acid-base balance. The greatest consensus is on the poor agreement of glucometer with capillary vs. laboratory samples in the presence of shock and vasopressor support, renal failure or during vitamin C treatment.Conclusions... (AU)

Monitorización de la glucemia en el paciente crítico adulto: tipo de muestra y método de análisis. Revisión sistemática y metanálisis / Blood glucose monitoring in critically ill adult patients: Type of sample and method of analysis. Systematic review and meta-analysis

IntroducciónLa guía clínica para el manejo de la sepsis recomienda usar muestras de sangre arterial para el control glucémico. Un estudio multicéntrico en 86 unidades de cuidados intensivos españolas reveló que el 85,4% de estas utilizaban punción capilar.ObjetivoAnalizar la fiabilidad de la glucemia comparando diferentes muestras sanguíneas (arterial, venosa, capilar) e instrumentos (glucómetros, gasómetros, laboratorio central). Secundariamente, estimar el efecto de variables confusoras y el rendimiento de los instrumentos de medición determinados por las diferentes normas de calidad.MetodologíaRevisión sistemática y metanálisis con búsqueda en las bases de datos PubMed, CINAHL y Embase en septiembre-2021 y septiembre-2022, sin límites temporales ni idiomáticos. Fuentes de literatura gris: DART-Europe, OpenGrey y Google Académico. Resultados resumidos mediante síntesis cualitativa (descripción de resultados, características de los estudios) y cuantitativa (metanálisis para evaluar la diferencia de medias estandarizadas). Calidad metodológica de artículos evaluada con Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2. Protocolo: https://osf.io/ DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/T8KYP.ResultadosSe incluyeron un total de 32 artículos y 5.451 pacientes. No se obtuvieron discrepancias entre muestras arteriales con glucómetro vs. laboratorio (sesgo [IC95%]: 0,01 [−0,12 a 0,14] mg/dL). En cambio, muestras arteriales con gasómetro sí sobreestimaron de forma significativa (sesgo [IC95%]: 0,12 [0,01 a 0,24] mg/dL). La misma tendencia presentan capilares con glucómetro, aunque no de forma significativa (sesgo [IC95%]: 0,07 [−0,02 a 0,15] mg/dL). Hay discrepancia entre los estudios sobre el efecto del hematocrito y el equilibrio ácido-base. El mayor consenso se da en la poca concordancia del glucómetro con muestras capilares vs. laboratorio en presencia de shock y soporte vasopresor, situación de fallo renal o durante el tratamiento con vitamina C.Conclusiones... (AU)

IntroductionThe clinical guideline for the management of sepsis recommends using arterial blood samples for glycaemic control. A multicentre study in 86 Spanish intensive care units revealed that 85.4% of these used capillary puncture.ObjectiveTo analyse the reliability of glycaemia by comparing different blood samples (arterial, venous, capillary) and instruments (glucometers, gasometers, central laboratory). Secondarily, to estimate the effect of confounding variables and the performance of measuring instruments as determined by different quality standards.MethodologySystematic review and meta-analysis with search in PubMed, CINAHL and Embase databases in September-2021 and September-2022, with no time or language limits. Grey literature sources: DART-Europe, OpenGrey and Google Scholar. Results summarised by qualitative (description of results, study characteristics) and quantitative (meta-analysis to assess standardised mean difference) synthesis. Methodological quality of articles assessed with Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2. Protocol: https://osf.io/ DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/T8KYP.ResultsA total of 32 articles and 5451 patients were included. No discrepancies were obtained between arterial glucometer vs. laboratory samples (bias [95%CI]: 0.01 [−0.12 to 0.14] mg/dL). In contrast, arterial samples with a gasometer did significantly overestimate (bias [95%CI]: 0.12 [0.01 to 0.24] mg/dL). The same trend is seen in capillaries with a glucometer, although not significantly (bias [95%CI]: 0.07 [−0.02 to 0.15] mg/dL). There is discrepancy between studies on the effect of haematocrit and acid-base balance. The greatest consensus is on the poor agreement of glucometer with capillary vs. laboratory samples in the presence of shock and vasopressor support, renal failure or during vitamin C treatment.Conclusions... (AU)

Family burden after critical illness: the forgotten caregivers / La sobrecarga familiar tras una enfermedad crítica: los cuidadores olvidados

Objective To determine the incidence of primary caregiver burden in a cohort of family members of critically ill patients admitted to ICU and to identify risk factors related to its development in both the patient and the family member. Design Prospective observational cohort study was conducted for 24 months. Setting Hospital Universitario Clínico San Cecilio, Granada. Patients The sample was the primary caregivers of all patients with risk factors for development of PICS (Post-Intensive Care Syndrome). Interventions The follow-up protocol consisted of evaluation 3 months after discharge from the ICU in a specific consultation. Main variables of interest The scales used in patients were Barthel, SF-12, HADS, Pfeiffer, IES-6 and in relatives the Apgar and Zarit. Results A total of 93 patients and caregivers were included in the follow-up. 15 relatives did not complete the follow-up questionnaires and were excluded from the study. The incidence of PICS-F (Family Post Intensive Care Syndrome) defined by the presence of primary caregiver burden in our cohort of patients is 34.6% (n=27), 95% CI 25.0−45.7. The risk factors for the development of caregiver burden are the presence of physical impairment, anxiety or post-traumatic stress in the patient, with no relationship found with the characteristics studied in the family member. Conclusions One out of 3 relatives of patients with risk factors for the development of PICS presents at 3 months caregiver burden. This is related to factors dependent on the patient's state of health. (AU)

Objetivo Determinar la incidencia de la sobrecarga del cuidador principal en una cohorte de familiares de pacientes críticos ingresados en UCI e identificar los factores de riesgo relacionados con su desarrollo tanto en el paciente como en el familiar. Diseño Estudio de cohortes observacional prospectivo durante 24 meses. Ámbito Hospital Universitario Clínico San Cecilio de Granada. Pacientes La muestra estuvo compuesta por los cuidadores principales de todos los pacientes con factores de riesgo para el desarrollo de SPCI (Síndrome Post-Cuidados Intensivos). Intervenciones El protocolo de seguimiento consistió en la evaluación a los 3 meses del alta de la UCI en una consulta específica. Variables de interés principales Las escalas utilizadas fueron Barthel, SF-12, HADS, Pfeiffer, IES-6, Apgar y Zarit. Resultados Un total de 93 pacientes y cuidadores fueron incluidos en el seguimiento. 15 cuidadores no completaron los cuestionarios de seguimiento y fueron excluidos del estudio. La incidencia de PICS-F (Síndrome Post-Cuidados Intensivos Familiar) definido por la presencia de sobrecarga del cuidador en nuestra cohorte es del 34,6% (n=27), IC 95% 25,0–45,7. Los factores de riesgo para el desarrollo del mismo son la presencia de deterioro físico, ansiedad o estrés postraumático en el paciente, no encontrándose relación con las características estudiadas en el familiar. Conclusiones Uno de cada 3 familiares de pacientes con factores de riesgo para el desarrollo de SPCI presenta a los 3 meses sobrecarga del cuidador, relacionándose con factores dependientes del estado de salud del paciente. (AU)

Comparación del riesgo nutricional alto por tres variantes del puntaje NUTrICen pacientes críticos ventilados / High nutritional risk by three variants of NUTRIC score in critically ventilated patients

Introducción: las variantes del puntaje NUTRIC con o sin biomarcadores inflamatorios, modificada sin interleucina-6 (IL-6) (NUTRICm), conproteína C reactiva (PCR) en lugar de IL-6, dicotómica (NUTRICpcr1) o en terciles (NUTRICpcr2), se propusieron para evaluar el riesgo nutricional(RN) en pacientes críticos. Sin embargo, la valoración del RN alto podría no ser uniforme entre dichos puntajes.Objetivos: comparar la valoración del RN alto por NUTRICm y las dos variantes del NUTRICpcr.Material y métodos: análisis de una cohorte prospectiva de pacientes ventilados previa al COVID-19. El acuerdo se analizó mediante la prueba deKappa y la discriminación de la mortalidad por regresión logística. La proporción de pacientes de RN alto se comparó con la prueba Chi-cuadrado.Resultados: se analizaron 550 pacientes. Mediana (RIQ) de edad y APACHE II: 44 (28-58) años y 17 (12-22) puntos, patología traumática predo-minante (38,2 %) y mortalidad en Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos (UCI) del 32,5 %. La concordancia fue alta entre NUTRICm y NUTRICpcr1 (Kappa= 0,81) y menor entre NUTRICm y NUTRICpcr2 (Kappa = 0,60). El AUCROC (IC 95 %) del NUTRICm, NUTRICpcr1 y NUTRICpcr2 para discriminarmortalidad fue de 0,695 (0,495-0,591), 0,693 (0,495-0,591) y 0,685 (0,495-0,591), respectivamente. El RN alto mostró diferencias significa-tivas entre NUTRICm y NUTRICpcr1 (19,8 % vs. 14,4 %, p 0,0243), y fue mayor entre NUTRICm y NUTRICpcr2 (19,8 vs. 9,8 %, p < 0,0001).Conclusión: las tres variantes del NUTRIC estudiadas discriminan la mortalidad en forma similar. Sin embargo, el NUTRICm, sin biomarcadorinflamatorio, clasifica más pacientes como de RN alto.(AU)

Introduction: variants of the NUTRIC score with or without inflammatory biomarkers, modified without interleukin 6 (IL-6) (NUTRICm), withC-reactive protein (CRP) instead of IL-6, dichotomous (NUTRICpcr1) or in tertiles (NUTRICpcr2), were proposed to assess nutritional risk (NR) incritical patients. However, the assessment of the high NR might not be uniform between these scores.Objectives: to compare the assessment of the high NR by NUTRICm and the two variants of the NUTRICpcr.Material and methods: analysis of a prospective cohort of patients ventilated prior to COVID-19. Agreement was analyzed using the Kappa testand mortality discrimination by logistic regression. The proportion of patients with high NR was compared with the Chi-square test.Results: five hundred and fifty patients were analyzed. Median (IQR) age and APACHE II: 44 (28-58) years and 17 (12-22) points, predominanttraumatic pathology (38.2 %) and Intensive Care Unit (ICU) mortality of 32.5 %. The concordance was high between NUTRICm and NUTRICpcr1(Kappa = 0.81) and lower between NUTRICm and NUTRICpcr2 (Kappa = 0.60). The AUCROC (95 % CI) of NUTRICm, NUTRICpcr1 and NUTRI-Cpcr2 to discriminate mortality was 0.695 (0.495-0.591), 0.693 (0.495-0.591) and 0.685 (0.495-0.591), respectively. The tall NB showedsignificant differences between NUTRICm and NUTRICpcr1 (19.8 % vs 14.4 %, p 0.0243), being greater between NUTRICm and NUTRICpcr2(19.8 vs 9.8 %, p < 0.0001).Conclusion: the three NUTRIC variants studied discriminate mortality in a similar way. However, the NUTRICm, without an inflammatory biomarker,classifies more patients as high nutritional risk.(AU)

Effectiveness of a specific follow up program for the management of the mental components of post-intensive care syndrome and chronic pain after COVID-19: results from the PAIN-COVID randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Critical COVID-19 survivors are at risk of developing Post-intensive Care Syndrome (PICS) and Chronic ICU-Related Pain (CIRP). We determined whether a specific care program improves the quality of life (QoL) of patients at risk of developing PICS and CIRP after COVID-19. METHODS: The PAIN-COVID trial was a parallel-group, single-centre, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial. The intervention consisted of a follow up program, patient education on PICS and pain, and a psychological intervention based on Rehm's self-control model in patients with abnormal depression scores (≥8) in the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at the baseline visit. QoL was evaluated with the 5-level EQ 5D (EQ 5D 5 L), mood disorders with the HADS, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) with the PCL-5 checklist, and pain with the Brief Pain Inventory short form, the Douleur Neuropathique 4 questionnaire, and the Pain Catastrophizing Scale. The primary outcome was to determine if the program was superior to standard-of-care on the EQ visual analogue scale (VAS) at 6 months after the baseline visit. The secondary outcomes were EQ VAS at 3 months, and EQ index, CIRP incidence and characteristics, and anxiety, depression, and PTSD at 3 and 6 months after baseline visits. CONCLUSIONS: This program was not superior to standard care in improving QoL in critical COVID-19 survivors as measured by the EQ VAS. However, our data can help establish better strategies for the study and management of PICS and CIRP in this population. TRIAL REGISTRATION: # NCT04394169, registered on 5/19/2020.

[High nutritional risk by three variants of NUTRIC score in critically ventilated patients]. / Comparación del riesgo nutricional alto por tres variantes del puntaje NUTRIC en pacientes críticos ventilados.

Introduction: Introduction: variants of the NUTRIC score with or without inflammatory biomarkers, modified without interleukin 6 (IL-6) (NUTRICm), with C-reactive protein (CRP) instead of IL-6, dichotomous (NUTRICpcr1) or in tertiles (NUTRICpcr2), were proposed to assess nutritional risk (NR) in critical patients. However, the assessment of the high NR might not be uniform between these scores. Objectives: to compare the assessment of the high NR by NUTRICm and the two variants of the NUTRICpcr. Material and methods: analysis of a prospective cohort of patients ventilated prior to COVID-19. Agreement was analyzed using the Kappa test and mortality discrimination by logistic regression. The proportion of patients with high NR was compared with the Chi-square test. Results: five hundred and fifty patients were analyzed. Median (IQR) age and APACHE II: 44 (28-58) years and 17 (12-22) points, predominant traumatic pathology (38.2 %) and Intensive Care Unit (ICU) mortality of 32.5 %. The concordance was high between NUTRICm and NUTRICpcr1 (Kappa = 0.81) and lower between NUTRICm and NUTRICpcr2 (Kappa = 0.60). The AUCROC (95 % CI) of NUTRICm, NUTRICpcr1 and NUTRICpcr2 to discriminate mortality was 0.695 (0.495-0.591), 0.693 (0.495-0.591) and 0.685 (0.495-0.591), respectively. The tall NB showed significant differences between NUTRICm and NUTRICpcr1 (19.8 % vs 14.4 %, p 0.0243), being greater between NUTRICm and NUTRICpcr2 (19.8 vs 9.8 %, p < 0.0001). Conclusion: the three NUTRIC variants studied discriminate mortality in a similar way. However, the NUTRICm, without an inflammatory biomarker, classifies more patients as high nutritional risk.

Introducción: Introducción: las variantes del puntaje NUTRIC con o sin biomarcadores inflamatorios, modificada sin interleucina-6 (IL-6) (NUTRICm), con proteína C reactiva (PCR) en lugar de IL-6, dicotómica (NUTRICpcr1) o en terciles (NUTRICpcr2), se propusieron para evaluar el riesgo nutricional (RN) en pacientes críticos. Sin embargo, la valoración del RN alto podría no ser uniforme entre dichos puntajes.. Objetivos: comparar la valoración del RN alto por NUTRICm y las dos variantes del NUTRICpcr. Material y métodos: análisis de una cohorte prospectiva de pacientes ventilados previa al COVID-19. El acuerdo se analizó mediante la prueba de Kappa y la discriminación de la mortalidad por regresión logística. La proporción de pacientes de RN alto se comparó con la prueba Chi-cuadrado. Resultados: se analizaron 550 pacientes. Mediana (RIQ) de edad y APACHE II: 44 (28-58) años y 17 (12-22) puntos, patología traumática predominante (38,2 %) y mortalidad en Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos (UCI) del 32,5 %. La concordancia fue alta entre NUTRICm y NUTRICpcr1 (Kappa = 0,81) y menor entre NUTRICm y NUTRICpcr2 (Kappa = 0,60). El AUCROC (IC 95 %) del NUTRICm, NUTRICpcr1 y NUTRICpcr2 para discriminar mortalidad fue de 0,695 (0,495-0,591), 0,693 (0,495-0,591) y 0,685 (0,495-0,591), respectivamente. El RN alto mostró diferencias significativas entre NUTRICm y NUTRICpcr1 (19,8 % vs. 14,4 %, p 0,0243), y fue mayor entre NUTRICm y NUTRICpcr2 (19,8 vs. 9,8 %, p < 0,0001). Conclusión: las tres variantes del NUTRIC estudiadas discriminan la mortalidad en forma similar. Sin embargo, el NUTRICm, sin biomarcador inflamatorio, clasifica más pacientes como de RN alto.

Family burden after critical illness: the forgotten caregivers.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence of primary caregiver burden in a cohort of family members of critically ill patients admitted to ICU and to identify risk factors related to its development in both the patient and the family member. DESIGN: Prospective observational cohort study was conducted for 24 months. SETTING: Hospital Universitario Clínico San Cecilio, Granada. PATIENTS: The sample was the primary caregivers of all patients with risk factors for development of PICS (Post-Intensive Care Syndrome). INTERVENTIONS: The follow-up protocol consisted of evaluation 3 months after discharge from the ICU in a specific consultation. MAIN VARIABLES OF INTEREST: The scales used in patients were Barthel, SF-12, HADS, Pfeiffer, IES-6 and in relatives the Apgar and Zarit. RESULTS: A total of 93 patients and caregivers were included in the follow-up. 15 relatives did not complete the follow-up questionnaires and were excluded from the study. The incidence of PICS-F (Family Post Intensive Care Syndrome) defined by the presence of primary caregiver burden in our cohort of patients is 34.6% (n=27), 95% CI 25.0-45.7. The risk factors for the development of caregiver burden are the presence of physical impairment, anxiety or post-traumatic stress in the patient, with no relationship found with the characteristics studied in the family member. CONCLUSIONS: One out of 3 relatives of patients with risk factors for the development of PICS presents at 3 months caregiver burden. This is related to factors dependent on the patient's state of health.

Blood glucose monitoring in critically ill adult patients: type of sample and method of analysis. Systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: The clinical guideline for the management of sepsis, recommends using arterial blood samples for glycaemic control. A multicentre study in 86 Spanish intensive care units (ICU) revealed that 85.4% of ICUs used capillary puncture. OBJECTIVE: To analyse the reliability of glycaemia by comparing different blood samples (arterial, venous, capillary) and instruments (glucometers, gasometers, central laboratory). Secondarily, to estimate the effect of confounding variables and the performance of measuring instruments as determined by different quality standards. METHODOLOGY: Systematic review and meta-analysis with search in PubMed, CINAHL and Embase databases in September-2021 and September-2022, with no time or language limits. Grey literature sources: DART-Europe, OpenGrey and Google Scholar. Results summarised by qualitative (description of results, study characteristics) and quantitative (meta-analysis to assess standardised mean difference) synthesis. Methodological quality of articles assessed with Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2). PROTOCOL: https://osf.io/ DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/T8KYP. RESULTS: A total of 32 articles and 5451 patients were included. No discrepancies were obtained between arterial glucometer vs laboratory samples [bias (95%CI): 0.01 (-0.12 to 0.14) mg/dL]. In contrast, arterial samples with a gasometer did significantly overestimate [bias (95%CI): 0.12 (0.01 to 0.24) mg/dL]. The same trend is seen in capillaries with a glucometer, although not significantly [bias (95%CI): 0.07 (--0.02 to 0.15) mg/dL]. There is discrepancy between studies on the effect of haematocrit and acid-base balance. The greatest consensus is on the poor agreement of glucometer with capillary vs laboratory samples in the presence of shock and vasopressor support, renal failure or during vitamin C treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence to date recommends the use of arterial blood with a blood glucose meter for better reliability of glycaemic analysis and less effect of possible confounding variables, frequently present in the critically ill adult patient.

Disminución de la debilidad muscular adquirida en una unidad de cuidados intensivos con la implementación de un protocolo multicomponente: ensayo clínico cuasiexperimental

Introducción. La debilidad adquirida en las unidades de cuidados intensivos es una complicación frecuente de los pacientes con enfermedades críticas, que puede tener un impacto negativo en su pronóstico a corto y a largo plazo. Objetivos. Evaluar si la utilización de un protocolo multicomponente, que incluye movilidad activa temprana, manejo efectivo del dolor, reducción de la sedación, medidas no farmacológicas para prevenir el delirium, estimulación cognitiva y apoyo familiar, puede disminuir la incidencia de debilidad adquirida en las unidades de cuidados intensivos al momento del egreso del paciente. Materiales y métodos. Se trata de un ensayo clínico, no aleatorizado, en dos unidades de cuidados intensivos mixtas de un hospital de tercer nivel. Los participantes fueron pacientes mayores de 14 años con ventilación mecánica invasiva por más de 48 horas. Se aplicó como intervención un protocolo multicomponente y como control se utilizó el cuidado usual o estándar. Resultados. Ingresaron 188 pacientes al estudio, 82 al grupo de intervención y 106 al grupo control. La tasa de debilidad adquirida en las unidades de cuidados intensivos al egreso de la unidad fue significativamente menor en el grupo de intervención (41,3 % versus 78,9 %, p<0,00001). La mediana del puntaje de movilidad al momento del alta de la unidad de cuidados intensivos fue mayor en el grupo de intervención (3,5 versus 2, p<0,0138). No se encontraron diferencias estadísticamente significativas en las medianas de días libres de respiración mecánica asistida, ni de unidad de cuidados intensivos al día 28, tampoco en la tasa de mortalidad general al egreso del hospital (18 versus 15 días, p<0,49; 18,2 % versus 27,3 %, p<0,167). Conclusiones. Un protocolo multicomponente que incluía movilidad activa temprana tuvo un impacto significativo en la reducción de la debilidad adquirida en las unidades de cuidados intensivos al egreso en comparación con el cuidado estándar.

Introduction. Intensive care unit-acquired weakness is a frequent complication that affects the prognosis of critical illness during hospital stay and after hospital discharge. Objectives. To determine if a multicomponent protocol of early active mobility involving adequate pain control, non-sedation, non-pharmacologic delirium prevention, cognitive stimulation, and family support, reduces intensive care unit-acquired weakness at the moment of discharge. Materials and methods. We carried out a non-randomized clinical trial in two mixed intensive care units in a high-complexity hospital, including patients over 14 years old with invasive mechanical ventilation for more than 48 hours. We compared the intervention -the multicomponent protocol- during intensive care hospitalization versus the standard care. Results. We analyzed 82 patients in the intervention group and 106 in the control group. Muscle weakness acquired in the intensive care unit at the moment of discharge was less frequent in the intervention group (41.3% versus 78.9%, p<0.00001). The mobility score at intensive unit care discharge was better in the intervention group (median = 3.5 versus 2, p < 0.0138). There were no statistically significant differences in the invasive mechanical ventilation-free days at day 28 (18 versus 15 days, p<0.49), and neither in the mortality (18.2 versus 27.3%, p<0.167). Conclusion. A multi-component protocol of early active mobility significantly reduces intensive care unit-acquired muscle weakness at the moment of discharge.

Relationship between handgrip strength and inspiratory muscles with the success of the spontaneous breathing trial

Introduction: In critically ill patients on mechanical ventilation, the loss of inspiratory and peripheral muscle strength is associated with prolonged mechanical ventilation and failed weaning. Objective: To determine the relationship between handgrip strength and inspiratory muscle strength with the success of the Spontaneous Breathing Trial in adults with ventilatory support greater than 48 hours. Methodology: Prospective observational cross-sectional study performed at a tertiary hospital in Colombia. Handgrip strength and Maximal Inspiratory Pressure were measured once a day before Spontaneous Breathing Trial testing. Pearson's test and Cohen's D test were used to analyze correlations. Results: A total of 51 patients were included, 57% male, with a mean age of 51.9±20 years. A positive correlation was identified between Maximal Inspiratory Pressure and grip strength; and a negative correlation between grip strength and Maximal Inspiratory Pressure with the days of stay in the intensive care unit, (r -0.40; p<0.05) and (r -0.45; p<0.05). Conclusions: Handgrip strength and Maximal Inspiratory Pressure were positively correlated with Spontaneous Breathing Trial success. The importance of these measures to guide ventilator disconnection processes is highlighted.

Introducción: En el paciente críticamente enfermo con ventilación mecánica, la pérdida de la fuerza de los músculos inspiratorios y periféricos se asocia con ventilación mecánica prolongada y destete fallido. Objetivo: Determinar la relación entre la fuerza de prensión manual y la fuerza de músculos inspiratorios con el éxito de la prueba de respiración espontánea en adultos con soporte ventilatorio mayor a 48 horas. Metodología: Estudio prospectivo observacional de corte transversal realizado en un hospital de tercer nivel en Colombia. La fuerza de prensión manual y la presión inspiratoria máxima se midieron una vez al día antes de la prueba de prueba de respiración espontánea. Se utilizaron la prueba de Pearson y la prueba D de Cohen para analizar las correlaciones. Resultados: Se incluyeron 51 pacientes, 57 % de sexo masculino, con una edad promedio de 51,9 ± 20 años. Se identificó una correlación positiva entre Presión Inspiratoria Máxima y fuerza de la mano; y una correlación negativa entre la fuerza de la mano y la Presión Inspiratoria Máxima con los días de estancia en la Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos, (r -0,40; p < 0,05) y (r -0,45;p < 0,05). Conclusiones: La fuerza de prensión manual y la Presión Inspiratoria Máxima se correlacionaron positivamente con el éxito de la Prueba de Respiración Espontánea. Se destaca la importancia de estas mediciones para guiar procesos de desconexión del ventilador.

[Prognostic utility of inflammatory indexes in critically ill newborns]. / Utilidad pronóstica de los índices inflamatorios en recién nacidos críticamente enfermos.

Background: Critically ill newborns (NB) are susceptible to serious complications due to their immature immune system. Objective: To know the prognostic utility of inflammatory indexes in critically ill NBs. Material and methods: Observational, analytical, longitudinal, prospective study. We included NBs hospitalized, critically ill and non-critically ill, who had a complete blood count at 12 hours of life (initial) and within 24 hours prior to discharge due to improvement or death (final). Systemic immune-inflammatory Index (SII), Neutrophil/Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) and Platelets/Lymphocyte Ratio (PLR) were analyzed. There was follow-up from birth to discharge. Results: 211 patients of 33 (32-34) weeks of gestation, weight 1.569 (1.480-1.720) kg. 106 critical NB and 105 non-critical NB, with 50 deaths in the former group, were analyzed. The final NLR ≥ 1.38 (sensitivity [S] 58%, specificity [Sp] 58%, AUC 0.60 [p 0.006]) identified critically ill NBs compared to non-critical ill NBs; final NLR ≥ 1.84 (S 71%, Sp 71%, AUC 0.79 [p < 0.0001]) identified critically ill NBs who died compared to all those who survived; final SII ≥ 255.411 x 103 (S 55%, Sp 56%, AUC 0.60 [p 0.047]) and final NLR ≥ 1.75 (S 76%, Sp 76%, AUC 0.84 [p < 0.0001]) identified critical NBs who died from those who survived. Conclusion: The final NLR predicts which NBs may perish with respect to all who survive. The final NLR and SII predict among critically ill NBs who may die.

Introducción: los recién nacidos (RN) críticamente enfermos son susceptibles de mal pronóstico debido a su sistema inmunitario inmaduro. Objetivo: conocer la utilidad pronóstica de los índices inflamatorios en RN críticamente enfermos. Material y métodos: estudio observacional, analítico, longitudinal, prospectivo. Incluimos RN hospitalizados, críticamente enfermos y no críticos, que contaran con biometría hemática completa a las 12 horas de vida (inicial) y dentro de las 24 horas previas al egreso por mejoría o defunción (final). Se analizó el Índice inmunosistémico (IIS), neutrófilos linfocitos (INL) y plaquetas linfocitos (IPL). Hubo seguimiento desde el nacimiento hasta el egreso. Resultados: se analizaron 211 pacientes, de 33 (32-34) semanas de gestación, peso 1.569 (1.480-1.720) kg; 106 RN críticos y 105 no críticos, con 50 defunciones en los primeros. El INL final ≥ 1.38 (sensibilidad [S] 58%, especificidad [E] 58%, ABC 0.60 [p 0.006]) identificó RN críticamente enfermos con respecto a RN no críticos; INL final ≥1.84 (S 71%, E 71%, ABC 0.79 [p < 0.0001]) identificó RN críticamente enfermos que fallecieron con respecto a todos los que sobrevivieron; el IIS final ≥ 255.411 x 103 (S 55%, E 56%, ABC 0.60 [p 0.047]) e INL final ≥ 1.75 (S 76%, E 76%, ABC 0.84 [p < 0.0001]) identificaron a RN críticamente enfermos que fallecieron con respecto a los que sobrevivieron. Conclusiones: el INL final predice que RN pueden fallecer con respecto a todos los que sobreviven. El INL y el IIS finales predicen entre los RN críticamente enfermos quiénes pueden fallecer.

Nutritional support in the critical ill patient: Requirements, prescription and adherence.

INTRODUCTION: In critically ill patients, nutritional support is a challenge in terms of both estimating their requirements and ensuring adherence to the prescribed treatment. OBJECTIVE: To assess the association between requirements, prescription and adherence to energy and protein supplementation based on the phase of disease in critically ill patients. SAMPLE AND METHODS: We conducted a prospective, observational and analytical study in patients aged 0-18 years admitted to the paediatric intensive or intermediate care unit in 2020-2021. We collected data on demographic and anthropometric characteristics and the phase of disease (acute phase [AP] vs. non-acute phase [nAP]), in addition to prescribing (P) (indication of nutritional support), basal metabolic rate (BMR, Schofield equation), adherence to nutritional support (A) and protein requirements (R), and calculated the following ratios: P/BMR, P/R, A/BMR, A/R, and A/P. RESULTS: The sample included 131 participants with a median age of 16 (4.5) months, of who 128 (97.7%) had comorbidities and 13 (9.9%) were in the AP. Comparing the phases of disease (AP vs. nAP), the median values for energy supplementation were P/BMR, 0.5 (IQR, 0.1-1.4) vs. 1.3 (IQR, 0.9-1.8) (P = 0.0054); A/BMR, 0.4 (IQR, 0-0.6) vs. 1.2 (IQR, 0.8-1.7) (P = 0.0005); A/P, 0.7 (IQR, 0-0.9) vs. 1 (IQR, 0.8-1) (P = 0.002), and for protein were P/R, 0.7 (IQR, 0-1.1) vs. 1.2 (0.9-1.6) (P = 0.0009); A/R 0.3 (IQR, 0-0.6) vs. 1.1 (IQR, 0.8-1.5) (P = 0.0002); A/P 0.7 (IQR, 0-1) vs. 1(IQR, 0.8-1) (P = 0.002). We found AP/nAP ratios greater than 110% for energy in the P/BMR (4 patients [30.8%]/72 patients [61%]; P = 0.007), A/BMR (3 [23%]/63 [53.4%]; P = 0.009) and A/P (1 [7%]/3 [2.5%]; P = 0.007). As for protein, more than 1.5 g/kg/day was prescribed in 3 patients (23.1%) in the AP and 71 (60.1%) in the nAP. We found adherence to the prescribed intake in 2 (15.4%) patients in the AP and 66 (56%) in the nAP. We found a correlation coefficient of 0.6 between the energy P/R and the protein P/R. Prescribed support was discontinued in 7 patients (53.8%) in the AP and 31 (26.3%) in the nAP (P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of adherence to prescribed nutritional support was high in patients in the nAP of the disease. Overfeeding was frequent, more so in the nAP. We identified difficulties in adhering to prescribed support, chief of which was the discontinuation of feeding.

Soporte nutricional en el paciente crítico: requerimiento, prescripción y cumplimiento / Nutritional support in the critical ill patient: Requirements, prescription and adherence

Introducción: El soporte nutricional en el paciente crítico es un desafío tanto en la estimación de requerimientos como en el cumplimiento de su prescripción. Objetivo: Evaluar las relaciones entre la prescripción, el requerimiento y el cumplimiento del soporte nutricional de energía y proteínas según la fase de la enfermedad en el paciente crítico. Pacientes y método: Estudio observacional, analítico, de datos obtenidos a través de reclutamiento prospectivo (2020-2021), pacientes de 0-18 años hospitalizados en la unidad de cuidados intensivos o intermedios pediátrica. Se obtuvieron datos demográficos, antropométricos y del estado agudo (FA)/no agudo (FNA) de la enfermedad. Se determinaron la prescripción (P) (indicación nutricional), el gasto energético basal (GEB) (fórmula de Schofield), el cumplimiento (C) de soporte nutricional, el requerimiento (R) proteico, creándose las siguientes relaciones: P/GEB, P/R, C/GEB, C/R, C/P. (AU)

Introduction: In critically ill patients, nutritional support is a challenge in terms of both estimating their requirements and ensuring adherence to the prescribed treatment. Objective: To assess the association between requirements, prescription and adherence to energy and protein supplementation based on the phase of disease in critically ill patients. Sample and methods: We conducted a prospective, observational and analytical study in patients aged 0-18years admitted to the paediatric intensive or intermediate care unit in 2020-2021. We collected data on demographic and anthropometric characteristics and the phase of disease (acute phase [AP] vs. non-acute phase [nAP]), in addition to prescribing (P) (indication of nutritional support), basal metabolic rate (BMR, Schofield equation), adherence to nutritional support (A) and protein requirements (R), and calculated the following ratios: P/BMR, P/R, A/BMR, A/R, and A/P. (AU)

Effectiveness of closed blood sampling systems in intensive care patients: a scoping review.

BACKGROUND: Anemia associated with blood extraction for diagnostic purposes is a highly prevalent entity in intensive care units (ICU) for adults. The evidence recommends its prevention through different strategies, among which we can find the use of closed blood sampling systems (CBSS). Different experimental studies support the use of these devices. OBJECTIVE: To identify knowledge gaps regarding the effectiveness of CBSS in ICU patients. METHODS: Scoping review with search in PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, Cochrane Library and Joanna Briggs Institute databases, between September-2021 and September-2022. No time, language, or other limits were applied to ensure the recovery of all relevant studies. Gray literature sources: DART-Europe, OpenGrey and Google Scholar. Two researchers independently reviewed titles and abstracts and assessed full texts against the inclusion criteria. The following data was extracted for each study: design and sample, inclusion and exclusion criteria, variables, type of CBSS, results and conclusions. RESULTS: 18 articles were included in the final review, 11 clinical trials (RCTs) published between 1992 and 2014. Three systematic reviews were found, but they only analyzed the effect of CBSS in reducing blood loss, hemoglobin stabilization, and the need for transfusion. Five of the RCTs analyzed the risk of infection, one catheter complications, and two alterations in blood pressure readings. CONCLUSIONS: The use of CBSS is recommended to reduce blood loss in ICUs. However, there are discrepancies about their ability to prevent anemia and/or the need for blood transfusion. Its use does not increase catheter-related infection rates or alter the measurement of mean arterial pressure.

Arterial cannulation in adult critical care patients: A comparative study between ultrasound guidance and palpation technique / Canulación arterial en pacientes adultos de cuidados críticos: un estudio comparativo entre la guía ecográfica y la técnica palpatoria

Objective To compare first attempt success rate for ultrasound-guided (USG) versus direct palpation (DP) for radial, femoral, and dorsalis pedis artery cannulations in adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Design Prospective randomized clinical trial. Setting Mixed adult ICU of a University Hospital. Participants Adult patients (≥18 years) admitted to the ICU requiring invasive arterial pressure monitoring were included. Exclusion criteria were patients with a pre-existing arterial line and cannulated with other than a 20-gauge cannula for radial and dorsalis pedis artery. Intervention Comparison of arterial cannulation by USG versus palpation technique in radial, femoral and dorsalis pedis arteries. Main variables of interest Primary outcome was first attempt success rate, secondary outcomes were assessing time for cannulations, number of attempts, overall success rate, complications, and comparison of two techniques on patients requiring vasopressor. Results 201 patients were enrolled in study, with 99 randomized to DP group and 102 to USG group. Arteries (radial, dorsalis pedis, femoral) cannulated in both groups were comparable (P = .193). Arterial line was placed on first attempt in 85 (83.3%) in USG group versus 55 (55.6%) in DP group (P = .02). Cannulation time in USG group was significantly shorter compared to DP group. Conclusions In our study, USG arterial cannulation, compared to palpatory technique, had a higher success rate at first attempt and a shorter cannulation time (AU)

Objetivo Comparar la tasa de éxito al primer intento de la técnica eco-dirigida (USG) versus la técnica palpatoria para la canulación de la arteria radial, femoral y dorsal del pie en pacientes adultos de la unidad de cuidados intensivos (UCI). Diseño Ensayo clínico aleatorizado prospectivo. Ámbito UCI mixta de adultos de un Hospital Universitario. Participantes Se incluyeron pacientes adultos (≥18 años) ingresados en la UCI que requirieron monitorización invasiva de la presión arterial. Los criterios de exclusión fueron la presencia de un catéter arterial preexistente y canulados con una cánula distinta del calibre 20 para la arteria radial y dorsal del pie. Intervención Comparación de la canulación arterial por USG versus la técnica palpatoria en la arteria radial, femoral y pedia. Principales variables de interés El resultado primario fue la tasa de éxito al primer intento; los resultados secundarios fueron evaluar el tiempo requerido para lograr una canulación exitosa, el número de intentos, la tasa de éxito general, las complicaciones y la comparación de dos técnicas en pacientes que requirieron vasopresores. Resultados 201 pacientes fueron reclutados en el estudio, con 99 aleatorizados al grupo DP y 102 al grupo USG. El número de canulaciones en las tres arterias fue similar entre ambos grupos (P = ,193). La línea arterial se colocó en el primer intento en 85 (83,3%) en el grupo USG versus 55 (55,6%) en el grupo DP (P = ,02). El tiempo de canulación en el grupo USG fue significativamente menor en comparación con el grupo de DP. Conclusiones En nuestro trabajo, la canulación arterial ecodirigida, en comparación con la técnica palpatoria, tuvo una mayor tasa de éxito al primer intento y un menor tiempo de canulación (AU)

Glucometrics in the first week of critical illness and its association with mortality / Glucometría en la primera semana de enfermedad crítica y su asociación con la mortalidad

Objective Evaluation of glucometrics in the first week of ICU stay and its association with outcomes. Design Prospective observational study. Setting Mixed ICU of teaching hospital. Patients Adults initiated on insulin infusion for 2 consecutive blood glucose (BG) readings ≥180mg/dL. Main variables of interest Glucometrics calculated from the BG of first week of admission: hyperglycemia (BG>180mg/dL) and hypoglycemia (BG<70mg/dL) episodes; median, standard deviation (SD) and coefficient of variation (CV) of BG, glycemic lability index (GLI), time in target BG range (TIR). Factors influencing glucometrics and the association of glucometrics to patient outcomes analyzed. Results A total of 5762 BG measurements in 100 patients of median age 55 years included. Glucometrics: hyperglycemia: 2253 (39%), hypoglycemia: 28 (0.48%), median BG: 169mg/dL (162–178.75), SD 31mg/dL (26–38.75), CV 18.6% (17.1–22.5), GLI: 718.5 [(mg/dL)2/h]/week (540.5–1131.5) and TIR 57% (50–67). Diabetes and higher APACHE II score were associated with higher SD and CV, and lower TIR. On multivariate regression, diabetes (p=0.009) and APACHE II score (p=0.016) were independently associated with higher SD. Higher SD and CV were associated with less vasopressor-free days; lower TIR with more blood-stream infections (BSI). Patients with higher SD, CV and GLI had a higher 28-day mortality. On multivariate analysis, GLI alone was associated with a higher mortality (OR 2.99, p=0.04). Conclusions Glycemic lability in the first week in ICU patients receiving insulin infusion is associated with higher mortality. Lower TIR is associated with more blood stream infections (AU)

Objetivo Evaluación de la glucometría en la primera semana de estancia en la UCI y su asociación con los resultados. Diseño Estudio observacional prospectivo. Ámbito UCI mixta de hospital docente. Pacientes Adultos que iniciaron una infusión de insulina para dos lecturas consecutivas de glucosa en sangre (GS) ≥180mg/dl. Principales variables de interés Glucometría calculada a partir de la GS de la primera semana de ingreso: episodios de hiperglucemia (GS >180mg/dl) e hipoglucemia (GS <70mg/dl); mediana, desviación estándar (DE) y coeficiente de variación (CV) de GS, índice de labilidad glucémica (ILG), tiempo en el rango objetivo de GS (TIR). Resultados Se incluyeron un total de 5.762 GS en 100 pacientes con una mediana de edad de 55años. Glucometría: hiperglucemia: 2.253 (39%), hipoglucemia: 28 (0,48%), mediana GS: 169mg/dl, DE 31mg/dl, CV 18,6%, ILG: 718,5 [(mg/dl)2/h]/semana, TIR 57%. La diabetes y una puntuación APACHEII más alta se asociaron con una DE y un CV más altos y una TIR más baja. En la regresión multivariada, la diabetes (p=0,009) y la puntuación APACHEII (p=0,016) se asociaron de forma independiente con una DE más alta. La DE y el CV más altos se asociaron con menos días sin vasopresores; menor TIR, con más infecciones del torrente sanguíneo (ITS). En el análisis multivariado, el ILG solo se asoció con una mayor mortalidad (OR: 2,99, p=0,04). Conclusiones La labilidad glucémica en la primera semana en pacientes de UCI que reciben infusión de insulina se asocia con mayor mortalidad. Una TIR más baja se asocia con más ITS (AU)

Halogenated anesthetics vs intravenous hypnotics for short and long term sedation in the intensive care unit: A meta-analysis / Anestésicos halogenados vs. hipnóticos intravenosos para sedación a corto y largo plazo en la unidad de cuidados intensivos: un metaanálisis

Objective To comprehensively assess peer-reviewed studies using volatile (VA) or intravenous (i/v) anesthetics for sedation in intensive care units (ICUs), with the hypothesis that the type of sedation may have an impact on survival and other clinically relevant outcomes. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and non-randomized trials. Setting ICUs. Participants Critically ill and postoperative patients. Interventions None. Measurements and main results Studies comparing VA versus i/v anesthetics used in the ICU settings were independently systematically searched. Finally, 15 studies (1520 patients of predominantly surgical profile needed VA sedation for less than 96h) were included. VA had no impact on all-cause mortality (very low quality of evidence, Odds Ratio=0.82 [0.60–1.12], p=0.20). However, VA were associated with a reduction in duration of mechanical ventilation (p=0.03) and increase in ventilator-free days (p<0.001). VA also reduced postoperative levels of cardiac troponin (24h), time to extubation (p<0.001) and awakening (p=0.04). Conclusions In this meta-analysis, volatile sedation vs propofol caused the increase in ventilator-free days, the reduction in the duration of mechanical ventilation, time to extubation and the troponin release in medical or surgical ICU patients, while in surgical ICU patients the time to awakening was shortened (AU)

Objetivos Evaluar exhaustivamente los estudios revisados por pares que utilizan anestésicos volátiles (AV) o intravenosos (iv) para sedación en unidades de cuidados intensivos (UCI), con la hipótesis de que el tipo de sedación puede tener un impacto en la supervivencia y otros resultados clínicamente relevantes. Diseño Revisión sistemática y metaanálisis de ensayos aleatorizados y no aleatorizados. Ámbito UCI. Pacientes Se incluyeron críticamente enfermos y postoperatorios. Intervenciones Ninguna. Mediciones y resultados principales Los estudios que comparaban los AV vs. los anestésicos iv utilizados en la UCI se buscaron de forma independiente y sistemática. Finalmente, se incluyeron 15 estudios (1.520 pacientes de perfil predominantemente quirúrgico necesitaron sedación de AV durante menos de 96h). El AV no tuvo impacto en la mortalidad por cualquier causa (calidad de los datos probatorios muy baja, Odds Ratio=0,82 [0,60-1,12], p=0,20). Sin embargo, el AV se asoció con una reducción de la duración de la ventilación mecánica (p=0,03) y aumento de los días sin ventilación mecánica (p<0,001). La AV también redujo los niveles postoperatorios de troponina cardíaca (24 horas), el tiempo hasta la extubación (p<0,001) y el despertar (p=0,04). Conclusiones En este metaanálisis, la sedación volátil vs. propofol causó el aumento de los días sin ventilación, la reducción de la duración de la ventilación mecánica, el tiempo hasta la extubación y la liberación de troponina en pacientes de la UCI médica o quirúrgica, mientras que en pacientes de la UCI quirúrgica el tiempo hasta el despertar se acortó (AU)

Analysis of adherence to an early mobilization protocol in an intensive care unit: Data collected prospectively over a period of three years by the clinical information system / Análisis de adherencia a un protocolo de movilización precoz en una unidad de cuidados intensivos: datos recopilados prospectivamente durante un periodo de tres años por el sistema de información clínica

Objective To determinate the adherence and barriers of our early mobilization protocol in patients who had received mechanical ventilation >48h in routine daily practice through clinical information system during all Intensive Care Unit (ICU) stay. Design Observational and prospective cohort study. Setting Polyvalent ICU over a three-year period (2017–2019). Patients Adult patients on mechanical ventilation >48h who met the inclusion criteria for the early mobilization protocol. Interventions None. Main variables of interest Demographics, adherence to the protocol and putative hidden adherence, total number of mobilizations, barriers, artificial airway/ventilatory support at each mobilization level and adverse events. Results We analyzed 3269 stay-days from 388 patients with median age of 63 (51–72) years, median APACHE II 23 (18–29) and median ICU stay of 10.1 (6.2–16.5) days. Adherence to the protocol was 56.6% (1850 stay-days), but patients were mobilized in only 32.2% (1472) of all stay-days. The putative hidden adherence was 15.6% (509 stay-days) which would increase adherence to 72.2%. The most common reasons for not mobilizing patients were failure to meeting the criteria for clinical stability in 241 (42%) stay-days and unavailability of physiotherapists in 190 (33%) stay-days. Adverse events occurred in only 6 (0.4%) stay-days. Conclusions Data form Clinical Information System showed although adherence was high, patients were mobilized in only one-third of all stay-days. Knowing the specific reason why patient were not mobilized in each stay-day allow to develop concrete decisions to increase the number of mobilizations (AU)

Objetivo Determinar la adherencia y barreras del protocolo de movilización precoz en pacientes que recibieron ventilación mecánica >48 horas en la práctica diaria habitual a través del sistema de información clínica durante toda su estancia en Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos (UCI). Diseño Estudio observacional y prospectivo. Ámbito UCI polivalente durante un periodo de tres años (2017-2019). Pacientes Se incluyeron pacientes adultos en ventilación mecánica > 48 horas que cumplieron los criterios de inclusión del protocolo. Intervenciones Ninguna. Variables principales Se aplicaron variables demográficas, adherencia y adherencia oculta, número total de movilizaciones, barreras, tipo vía aérea artificial/soporte ventilatorio en cada nivel de movilización y eventos adversos. Resultados Analizamos 3.269 días de estancia de 388 pacientes con una mediana de edad de 63 (51-72) años, mediana de APACHE-II 23(18-29) y estancia en UCI mediana de 10,1 (6,2-16,5) días. La adherencia al protocolo fue del 56,6% (1.850 días de estancia), pero los pacientes se movilizaron solo el 32,2% (1.472) de todos los días de estancia. La adherencia oculta fue del 15,6% (509 días de estancia), aumentando la adherencia al 72,2%. Las causas más comunes para la no movilización fueron el incumplimiento de los criterios de estabilidad clínica en 241 (42%) días de estancia y la falta de disponibilidad de fisioterapeutas en 190 (33%) días de estancia. Los eventos adversos ocurrieron en solo 6 (0,4%) días de estancia. Conclusiones Aunque la adherencia fue alta, los pacientes se movilizaron en solo un tercio de todos los días de estancia. Conocer el motivo específico por el cual los pacientes no fueron movilizados permite desarrollar decisiones concretas para incrementar el número de movilizaciones (AU)

Clinical presentation and outcomes of acute heart failure in the critically ill patient: A prospective, observational, multicentre study / Presentación clínica y resultados de la insuficiencia cardíaca aguda en el paciente crítico: estudio prospectivo, observacional y multicéntrico

Aims To assess the clinical profile and factors associated with 30-day mortality in patients with acute heart failure (AHF) admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). Design Prospective, multicentre cohort study. Scope Thirty-two Spanish ICUs. Patients Adult patients admitted to the ICU between April and June 2017. Intervention Patients were classified into three groups according to AHF status: without AHF (no AHF); AHF as the primary reason for ICU admission (primary AHF); and AHF developed during the ICU stay (secondary AHF). Main variables of interest Incidence of AHF and 30-day mortality. Results A total of 4330 patients were included. Of these, 627 patients (14.5%) had primary (n=319; 7.4%) or secondary (n=308; 7.1%) AHF. Among the main precipitating factors, fluid overload was more common in the secondary AHF group than in the primary group (12.9% vs 23.4%, p<0.001). Patients with AHF had a higher risk of 30-day mortality than those without AHF (OR 2.45; 95% CI: 1.93–3.11). APACHE II, cardiogenic shock, left ventricular ejection fraction, early inotropic therapy, and diagnostic delay were independently associated with 30-day mortality in AHF patients. Diagnostic delay was associated with a significant increase in 30-day mortality in the secondary group (OR 6.82; 95% CI 3.31–14.04). Conclusions The incidence of primary and secondary AHF was similar in this cohort of ICU patients. The risk of developing AHF in ICU patients can be reduced by avoiding modifiable precipitating factors, particularly fluid overload. Diagnostic delay was associated with significantly higher mortality rates in patients with secondary AHF (AU)

Objetivos Evaluar el perfil clínico y los factores asociados con la mortalidad a 30 días en pacientes con insuficiencia cardíaca aguda (ICA) ingresados en Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos (UCI). Diseño Prospectivo, multicéntrico. Ámbito 32 UCI españolas. Pacientes Pacientes adultos ingresados en UCI entre abril y junio de 2017. Intervención Los pacientes se clasificaron en tres grupos según el estado de la ICA: sin ICA (no ICA), ICA como motivo principal de ingreso en UCI (ICA-primaria), e ICA desarrollada durante la estancia en UCI (ICA-secundaria). Principales variables de interés Incidencia de ICA y mortalidad a los 30 días. Resultados Se incluyeron 4.330 pacientes, de estos, 627 (14,5%) tenían ICA-primaria (n = 319; 7,4%) o secundaria (n = 308; 7,1%). Entre los principales factores precipitantes, la sobrecarga hídrica fue más común en el grupo ICA-secundaria que el ICA-primaria (12,9 vs. 23,4%, p < 0,001). Los pacientes con ICA tuvieron un mayor riesgo de mortalidad que los que no tenían ICA (OR 2,45; IC 95%: 1,93-3,11). APACHE II, choque cardiogénico, fracción de eyección del ventrículo izquierdo, tratamiento precoz con inotrópicos y el retraso diagnóstico se asociaron de forma independiente con la mortalidad en los pacientes con ICA. El retraso diagnóstico se asoció con un aumento significativo de mortalidad en el grupo secundario (OR 6,82; IC 95%: 3,31-14,04). Conclusiones La incidencia de ICA primaria y secundaria fue similar. El riesgo de desarrollar ICA en pacientes críticos puede reducirse evitando factores precipitantes modificables, en particular la sobrecarga de líquidos. El retraso diagnóstico se asoció con mayor mortalidad en pacientes con ICA-secundaria (AU)

Arterial cannulation in adult critical care patients: A comparative study between ultrasound guidance and palpation technique.

OBJECTIVE: To compare first attempt success rate for ultrasound-guided (USG) versus direct palpation (DP) for radial, femoral, and dorsalis pedis artery cannulations in adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients. DESIGN: Prospective randomized clinical trial. SETTING: Mixed adult ICU of a University Hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Adult patients (≥18 years) admitted to the ICU requiring invasive arterial pressure monitoring were included. Exclusion criteria were patients with a pre-existing arterial line and cannulated with other than a 20-gauge cannula for radial and dorsalis pedis artery. INTERVENTION: Comparison of arterial cannulation by USG versus palpation technique in radial, femoral and dorsalis pedis arteries. MAIN VARIABLES OF INTEREST: Primary outcome was first attempt success rate, secondary outcomes were assessing time for cannulations, number of attempts, overall success rate, complications, and comparison of two techniques on patients requiring vasopressor. RESULTS: 201 patients were enrolled in study, with 99 randomized to DP group and 102 to USG group. Arteries (radial, dorsalis pedis, femoral) cannulated in both groups were comparable (P = .193). Arterial line was placed on first attempt in 85 (83.3%) in USG group versus 55 (55.6%) in DP group (P = .02). Cannulation time in USG group was significantly shorter compared to DP group. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, USG arterial cannulation, compared to palpatory technique, had a higher success rate at first attempt and a shorter cannulation time. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY OF INDIA NUMBER: CTRI/2020/01/022989.