Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 68
Filter
1.
Cir Cir ; 92(2): 276-282, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38782380

ABSTRACT

The endoscopic treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) has evolved significantly in the past 20 years. Current practices include devices specifically designed for GERD. Newer techniques aim to use less extra equipment, to be less costly, and to use accessories readily available in endoscopy units, as well as using standard endoscopes to apply such techniques. It is of utmost importance to properly select the patients for endoscopic therapy, and it should be done in a multidisciplinary approach.


El tratamiento endoscópico de la enfermedad por reflujo gastroesofágico (ERGE) ha evolucionado significativamente en los últimos 20 años. Las prácticas actuales incluyen dispositivos diseñados específicamente para la ERGE. Las técnicas más nuevas tienen como objetivo utilizar menos equipos adicionales, ser menos costosos y utilizar accesorios fácilmente disponibles en las unidades de endoscopia, así como utilizar endoscopios estándar para aplicar dichas técnicas. Es de suma importancia seleccionar adecuadamente a los pacientes para la terapia endoscópica, y debe hacerse en un enfoque multidisciplinario.


Subject(s)
Gastroesophageal Reflux , Gastroesophageal Reflux/surgery , Gastroesophageal Reflux/therapy , Humans , Esophagoscopy/methods , Fundoplication/methods , Patient Selection , Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal/methods
2.
Rev. gastroenterol. Perú ; 44(1): 41-51, ene.-mar. 2024. tab, graf
Article in Spanish | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1560048

ABSTRACT

RESUMEN Un adecuado abordaje de la enfermedad por reflujo gastroesofágico refractaria (rERGE) es imprescindible para lograr el éxito terapéutico. Desde la definición precisa de rERGE hasta la detallada caracterización de sus fenotipos, establecerá el camino hacia la personalización de la terapia óptima para cada paciente. En esta revisión narrativa de la literatura, se busca proporcionar una síntesis actualizada de la utilidad de las diversas herramientas diagnósticas y explorar el amplio espectro de opciones terapéuticas, tanto médicas como invasivas disponibles para esta condición.


ABSTRACT An adequate approach to refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease (rGERD) is essential for achieving therapeutic success. From the precise definition of rGERD to the detailed characterization of its phenotypes, it will pave the way for the customization of optimal therapy for each patient. In this narrative literature review, the aim is to provide an updated synthesis of the utility of various diagnostic tools and explore the wide range of therapeutic options, both medical and invasive, available for this condition.

3.
Cir. Esp. (Ed. impr.) ; 102(1): 25-31, Ene. 2024. ilus, tab
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-229699

ABSTRACT

Introducción: La cirugía antirreflujo se asocia con frecuencia a tasas significativas de recurrencia y complicaciones, habiéndose propuesto varias técnicas quirúrgicas para minimizarlas. El objetivo del estudio es evaluar los resultados a tres años de una funduplicatura con disección extensa de la unión esofagogástrica (UEG). Métodos: Estudio observacional retrospectivo que incluyó a 178 pacientes con enfermedad por reflujo gastroesofágico (ERGE) o hernia de hiato (HH) a los que se les realizó una funduplicatura con disección extensa de la UEG entre 2015 y 2020. La recidiva herniaria, los síntomas y la calidad de vida al primer año y a los tres siguientes de la cirugía fueron evaluados mediante tránsito baritado, endoscopia y cuestionarios para síntomas y calidad de vida (Gastro Esophageal Reflux Disease-Health Related Quality of Life [GERD-HRQL]). Resultados: La tasa de pirosis fue de 7,5 y 10,7% al año y a los tres siguientes, respectivamente, regurgitación de 3,8 y 6,9% y disfagia de 3,7 y 7,6%. La presencia de hernia hiatal se evidenció preoperatoriamente en 55,1% y en 7,8 y 9,6% en el seguimiento y la mediana de la escala GERD-HRQL fue de 27, 2 y 0, respectivamente. No aparecieron casos de telescopaje de la funduplicatura ni síntomas que sugieran lesión vagal. No se encontraron diferencias al comparar los distintos tipos de funduplicatura en términos de recidiva del reflujo, complicaciones o recurrencia de la hernia. Conclusiones: La funduplicatura con disección extensa de la UEG contribuye a su correcto posicionamiento y mejor anclaje, lo que asocia bajas tasas de recidiva herniaria y del reflujo, así como disminuye la posibilidad de telescopaje y lesión vagal.(AU)


Introduction: Antireflux surgery is commonly associated with significant recurrence and complication rates, and several surgical techniques have been proposed to minimize them. The aim of this study is to evaluate the results of a fundoplication with extensive dissection of the esophagogastric junction 1 and 3 years after the procedure.Methods: Retrospective observational study including 178 patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease or hiatal hernia who underwent fundoplication with extensive dissection of the esophagogastric junction between 2015 and 2020. Hernia recurrence, symptoms and quality of life at 1 and 3 years after surgery were assessed by barium transit, endoscopy and questionnaires for symptoms and quality of life (GERD-HRQL). Results: Heartburn rate was 7.5% and 10.7% at 1 and 3 years respectively, regurgitation 3.8% and 6.9% and dysphagia was 3.7% and 7.6%. The presence of hiatal hernia was evident preoperatively in 55.1% and in 7.8% and 9.6% at follow-up and the median GERD-HRQL scale was 27, 2 and 0, respectively. There were no cases of slippage of the fundoplication or symptoms suggestive of vagal injury. No differences were found when comparing the different types of fundoplication in terms of reflux and recurrence or complications. Conclusions: Fundoplication with extensive dissection of the esophagogastric junction contributes to correct positioning and better anchorage of the fundoplication, which is associated with low rates of hiatal hernia and reflux recurrence, as well as absence of slippage and lower possibility of vagal injury.(AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Esophagogastric Junction/surgery , Hernia, Hiatal , Gastroesophageal Reflux , Prevalence , Heartburn , Retrospective Studies , General Surgery
4.
Cir Esp (Engl Ed) ; 102(1): 25-31, 2024 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38141845

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Antireflux surgery is commonly associated with significant recurrence and complication rates, and several surgical techniques have been proposed to minimize them. The aim of this study is to evaluate the results of a fundoplication with extensive dissection of the esophagogastric junction 1 and 3 years after the procedure. METHODS: Retrospective observational study including 178 patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease or hiatal hernia who underwent fundoplication with extensive dissection of the esophagogastric junction between 2015 and 2020. Hernia recurrence, symptoms and quality of life at 1 and 3 years after surgery were assessed by barium transit, endoscopy and questionnaires for symptoms and quality of life (GERD-HRQL). RESULTS: Heartburn rate was 7.5% and 10.7% at 1 and 3 years respectively, regurgitation 3.8% and 6.9% and dysphagia was 3.7% and 7.6%. The presence of hiatal hernia was evident preoperatively in 55.1% and in 7.8% and 9.6% at follow-up and the median GERD-HRQL scale was 27, 2 and 0 respectively. There were no cases of slippage of the fundoplication or symptoms suggestive of vagal injury. No differences were found when comparing the different types of fundoplication in terms of reflux and recurrence or complications. CONCLUSIONS: Fundoplication with extensive dissection of the esophagogastric junction contributes to correct positioning and better anchorage of the fundoplication, which is associated with low rates of hiatal hernia and reflux recurrence, as well as absence of slippage and lower possibility of vagal injury.


Subject(s)
Gastroesophageal Reflux , Hernia, Hiatal , Laparoscopy , Humans , Fundoplication/methods , Hernia, Hiatal/surgery , Quality of Life , Treatment Outcome , Laparoscopy/methods , Gastroesophageal Reflux/etiology , Esophagogastric Junction/surgery
5.
Article in English | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1535957

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Two parameters of high-resolution esophageal manometry are used to observe the function of the esophagogastric junction (EGJ): the anatomical morphology of the EGJ and contractile vigor, which is evaluated with the esophagogastric junction contractile integral (EGJ-CI). To date, how these parameters behave in different gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) phenotypes has not been evaluated. Materials and methods: An analytical observational study evaluated patients with GERD confirmed by pH-impedance testing and endoscopy undergoing high-resolution esophageal manometry. The anatomical morphology of the EGJ and EGJ-CI was assessed and compared between reflux phenotypes: acid, non-acid, erosive, and non-erosive. Results: 72 patients were included (63% women, mean age: 54.9 years), 81.9% with acid reflux and 25% with erosive esophagitis. In the latter, a decrease in EGJ-CI (median: 15.1 vs. 23, p = 0.04) and a more significant proportion of patients with type IIIa and IIIb EGJ (83.3% vs 37.1%, p < 0.01) were found. No significant differences existed in the manometric parameters of patients with and without acid and non-acid reflux. Conclusion: In our population, EGJ-CI significantly decreased in patients with erosive GERD, suggesting that it could be used to predict this condition in patients with GERD. This finding is also related to a higher proportion of type III EGJ and lower pressure at end-inspiration of the lower esophageal sphincter in this reflux type.


Introducción: Para observar la función de la unión esofagogástrica (UEG) se utilizan dos parámetros de la manometría esofágica de alta resolución: la morfología anatómica de la UEG y el vigor contráctil, el cual se evalúa con la integral de contractilidad distal de la unión esofagogástrica (IC-UEG). Hasta el momento, no se ha evaluado cómo se comportan estos parámetros en los diferentes fenotipos de enfermedad por reflujo gastroesofágico (ERGE). Metodología: Estudio observacional analítico en el que se evaluaron pacientes con ERGE confirmado por pH-impedanciometría y endoscopia, llevados a manometría esofágica de alta resolución. Se evaluó la morfología anatómica de la UEG y la IC-UEG, y se comparó entre los diferentes fenotipos de reflujo: ácido, no ácido, erosivo y no erosivo. Resultados: Se incluyó a 72 pacientes (63% mujeres, edad media: 54,9 años), 81,9% con reflujo ácido y 25% con esofagitis erosiva. En este último grupo se encontró una disminución de la IC-UEG (mediana: 15,1 frente a 23, p = 0,04) y una mayor proporción de pacientes con UEG tipo IIIa y IIIb (83,3% frente a 37,1%, p < 0,01). No se encontraron diferencias significativas en los parámetros manométricos de los pacientes con y sin reflujo ácido y no ácido. Conclusión: En nuestra población, la IC-UEG estuvo significativamente disminuida en los pacientes con ERGE erosivo, lo que sugiere que podría ser utilizada como un predictor de esta condición en pacientes con ERGE. Este hallazgo también se relaciona con mayor proporción de UGE tipo III y menor presión al final de la inspiración del esfínter esofágico inferior en este tipo de reflujo.

6.
Rev. gastroenterol. Perú ; 43(4)oct. 2023.
Article in Spanish | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1536370

ABSTRACT

La cápsula inalámbrica para medir el reflujo gastroesofágico o tambien conocida como cápsula de pHmetría, es una técnica utilizada en la monitorización ambulatoria del reflujo. Esta cápsula es introducida mediante una guía al esofágo y se coloca mediante un sistema de succión y anclaje a la mucosa esofágica. De alli, se comunica con un dispositivo externo mediante señales de radio para registrar la actividad del ácido gástrico en el esófago durante un período determinado de tiempo. A diferencia de la técnica convencional, que implica la inserción de un tubo a través de la nariz hasta el esófago, la cápsula inalámbrica puede ser una alternativa más cómoda y tolerable para los pacientes, lo que podría mejorar la adherencia al procedimiento. Sin embargo, algunos pacientes pueden presentar dolor torácico tras la colocación de la cápsula de pHmetría. Presentamos el caso de una mujer con cuadro clínico de reflujo gastroesofágico, con colocación capsula de pHmetría inalámbrica, lo cual generó dolor torácico severo que precisó la retirada de la cápsula vía endoscópica.


The wireless capsule to measure gastroesophageal reflux, also known as pH monitoring capsule, is a technique used in ambulatory reflux monitoring. This capsule is introduced through a guide into the esophagus and is placed using a suction system and anchored to the esophageal mucosa. From there, it communicates with an external device using radio signals to record the activity of gastric acid in the esophagus over a specified period of time. Unlike the conventional technique, which involves inserting a tube through the nose into the esophagus, the wireless capsule may be a more comfortable and tolerable alternative for patients, potentially improving adherence to the procedure. In some cases, patients may present chest pain after placement of the pH monitoring capsule, however there is little evidence about the etiology and management. We present the case of a woman with a clinical picture of gastroesophageal reflux, with pH monitoring capsule placement, which resulted in severe chest pain that required endoscopic capsule removal.

7.
Cir Cir ; 91(3): 403-410, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37441725

ABSTRACT

The advancement of knowledge in pathophysiology and underlying etiologies of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) has allowed the development of the concept of disease beyond the acidity of reflux. The variability in the symptom presentation and the response to treatment cannot be attributed only to reflux composition, since esophageal factors, such as structural, mechanical, biochemical, and physiological aspects, play an important role. The proposed personalized approach to GERD uses a stepwise approach that optimizes performance and phenotypic outcome while minimizing invasiveness, risk, and cost. Throughout the staggered approach to determine the GERD phenotype, clinicians may choose to stop further testing and continue treatment if available information identifies a different GERD phenotype. Since not all phenotypes GERD are the same and not all treatments are appropriate for all patients, therapeutic strategies must be personalized according to their phenotype.


El avance del conocimiento sobre la fisiopatología y la etiología subyacentes a la enfermedad por reflujo gastroesofágico (ERGE) ha permitido que el desarrollo de esta se extienda más allá de la acidez del reflujo. La variabilidad en la presentación de los síntomas y la respuesta al tratamiento no se puede atribuir solo a la composición del reflujo, ya que factores esofágicos, como aspectos estructurales, mecánicos, bioquímicos y fisiológicos, desempeñan un papel importante. El enfoque personalizado propuesto para la ERGE utiliza un método gradual que optimiza el rendimiento y el resultado fenotípico, y minimiza la invasividad, el riesgo y el costo. A lo largo del método escalonado para determinar el fenotipo de la ERGE, los médicos pueden optar por detener las pruebas adicionales y continuar con el tratamiento si la información disponible identifica un fenotipo de ERGE distinto. Dado que la ERGE no es la misma y no todos los tratamientos disponibles para controlarla son apropiados para todos los pacientes, las estrategias terapéuticas deben personalizarse de acuerdo con su fenotipo.


Subject(s)
Gastroesophageal Reflux , Humans , Gastroesophageal Reflux/etiology , Gastroesophageal Reflux/diagnosis , Retrospective Studies
8.
Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 46(6): 455-461, 2023.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36273654

ABSTRACT

AIM: To investigate the mucoadhesive strength and barrier effect of Esophacare® (Atika Pharma SL, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria) in an ex vivo model of gastro-oesophageal reflux. METHODS: An ex vivo evaluation through the Falling Liquide Film Technique with porcine esophagi was performed, compared to a positive control (Ziverel®; Norgine, Amsterdam), after different washing periods with saline, acidified saline (pH 1.2) and acidified saline with pepsin (2000U/mL). RESULTS: The adhesive mean strength on the oesophageal mucosa of Esophacare was 94.7 (6.0)%, compared to 27.6 (19.1)% of the positive control (p<0.05). These results were homogeneous across the different washes and throughout the tissue. The area covered by 1mL of Esophacare, and its respective persistence after washing was also assessed, yielding a mean global persistence of 74.29 (19.7)% vs. 18.9 (12.3)% for the control (p<0.05). In addition, after 30min exposure to acidified saline with pepsin, Esophacare shows a protective effect on the oesophageal mucosa, detectable histologically: preserved integrity and structure of the apical layers was observed, as well as reduced permeability to the washing solution. CONCLUSIONS: Esophacare shows an adhesive strength close to 100%, irrespective of the washing solution applied or the oesophageal region studied. Histologically, it reduces the abrasive effects of the acidic solution on the oesophageal epithelium, reducing permeability to the washing solution. The results in this ex vivo model of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) support its therapeutic potential.


Subject(s)
Esophagitis, Peptic , Esophagitis , Gastroesophageal Reflux , Humans , Pepsin A/therapeutic use , Esophagitis/pathology , Gastroesophageal Reflux/drug therapy , Hydrogen-Ion Concentration
9.
Repert. med. cir ; 32(1): 92-96, 2023. tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS, COLNAL | ID: biblio-1526557

ABSTRACT

La enfermedad por reflujo gastroesofágico (ERGE) se manifiesta cuando el quimo gástrico refluye al esófago y pasa de ser fisiológico a sintomático y patológico. Es frecuente a nivel mundial y de difícil abordaje diagnóstico debido a la multitud de síntomas y presentaciones, haciendo que su enfoque terapéutico sea complejo. Existen múltiples opciones de tratamiento siendo el farmacológico basado en inhibidores de bomba de protones (IBP) la piedra angular. El manejo quirúrgico está descrito pero reservado a ciertos pacientes específicos. La terapia endoscópica surge como otra opción con indicaciones similares a la cirugía, pero con las ventajas propias de los procedimientos endoscópicos. Se han descrito varias técnicas endoluminales con pobres resultados, que no se han logrado popularizar.


Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) occurs when gastric chyme refluxes back into the esophagus and changes from physiologic to symptomatic and pathologic. It is common worldwide and is difficult to diagnose due to the diversity of symptoms and presentations, making its therapeutic approach complex. Although there are multiple treatment options, proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) have been the mainstay of pharmacological management of GERD. Surgical treatment is described but is used in selected patients. Endoscopic therapy emerges as another option with similar indications as surgery, featuring the advantages of endoscopic procedures. Several endoluminal techniques have been described showing poor results, thus their generalized use has not been achieved.


Subject(s)
Humans
10.
Gac. méd. Méx ; 158(6): 432-438, nov.-dic. 2022. tab, graf
Article in Spanish | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1430374

ABSTRACT

Resumen Introducción: Una encuesta nacional en población abierta mostró que la enfermedad por reflujo gastroesofágico (ERGE) tiene alta prevalencia en México. Objetivo: Comparar la eficacia y seguridad de dos isómeros, dexrabeprazol (10 mg) versus esomeprazol (20 mg), en el tratamiento de la ERGE durante cuatro semanas. Métodos: Ensayo clínico fase III, aleatorizado, multicéntrico, prospectivo, doble ciego, en dos grupos que incluyeron 230 pacientes. Resultados: Con ambos tratamientos se observó disminución estadísticamente significativa en la severidad de los síntomas de ERGE (pirosis, regurgitación, dolor epigástrico y disfagia), evaluados mediante una escala visual análoga. La puntuación promedio de dexrabeprazol en el Cuestionario de Carlsson-Dent a los 28 días fue de 2.12 y la de esomeprazol de 3.02. Ambos tratamientos fueron efectivos, sin diferencia estadísticamente significativa (p < 0.05). En el Cuestionario de Salud SF-36 se observó que ambos mejoraron la puntuación en la calidad de vida, sin diferencia significativa. Ambos medicamentos fueron bien tolerados y el perfil de incidencia de eventos adversos fue bajo. Conclusiones: En el tratamiento de ERGE no erosiva, el uso de 10 mg/día de dexrabeprazol es tan efectivo como 20 mg/día de esomeprazol, con la ventaja de que la dosis es menor con un adecuado perfil de seguridad.


Abstract Introduction: A national survey in the general population showed that gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is highly prevalent in Mexico. Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of two isomers, dexrabeprazole (10 mg) vs. esomeprazole (20 mg), in the treatment of GERD for four weeks. Methods: Randomized, multicenter, prospective, double-blind phase III clinical trial in two groups that included 230 patients. Results: A statistically significant decrease in the severity of GERD symptoms (heartburn, regurgitation, epigastric pain and dysphagia), evaluated using a visual analogue scale, was observed with both treatments. Mean score for dexrabeprazole on Carlsson-Dent questionnaire at 28 days was 2.12, and for esomeprazole, 3.02. Both treatments were effective, with no statistically significant difference being recorded (p < 0.05). On SF-36 health questionnaire, both were observed to improve the quality-of-life score, with no significant difference being identified. Both drugs were well tolerated, and the adverse event incidence profile was low. Conclusions: In the treatment of non-erosive GERD, the use of dexrabeprazole at 10 mg/day is as effective as esomeprazole 20 mg/day, with the advantage that the dose is lower with an appropriate safety profile.

11.
Pediatr. aten. prim ; 24(93)ene. - mar. 2022. tab
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-210309

ABSTRACT

Introducción: el gold standard para el diagnóstico de reflujo ácido en Pediatría es la pHmetría 24 horas. La ecografía ha demostrado ser una técnica incruenta y existen pocos estudios que la comparen con la pHmetría. Métodos: estudio prospectivo, observacional y analítico. Se realizó estudio ecográfico a pacientes con indicación de pHmetría, y previa a esta. Se determinaron variables ecográficas propuestas por el grupo de ecografía de la SEGHNP (Gomes 1991 modificado), considerando la presencia de reflujo ácido patológico si tenía dos o más parámetros alterados. Resultados: se incluyeron 32 pacientes, 68,8% (n = 22) varones, entre 1 mes y 13 años. Tenían pHmetría patológica el 59,3% (n = 19). El diagnóstico de reflujo por ecografía según lo propuesto por la SEGHNP no se relacionó con el diagnóstico de reflujo ácido por pHmetría (p = 0,169). La ecografía presentó una sensibilidad de 60% y una especificidad del 61,5%, con valor predictivo positivo (VPP) de 70,58% y valor predictivo negativo de 53,3%. Al analizar cada variable ecográfica y compararla con la presencia de reflujo por pHmetría no hubo datos significativos. Sin embargo, un ángulo de Hiss patológico y una longitud del esófago abdominal menor de 1,3 cm se asociaron estadísticamente con reflujo ácido por pHmetría (p = 0,033), obteniendo un VPP, cociente de probabilidad positivo y probabilidad preprueba positiva altos (88,9%; 5,47; 89,1%, respectivamente), con proporción de falsos positivos bajo (7,7%). Conclusión: en nuestra población estudiada, los criterios ecográ9 (AU)ficos propuestos por la SEGHNP no se relacionan con pHmetría patológica, pero si la presencia de un esófago abdominal menor de 1,3 cm junto a un ángulo de Hiss mayor de 110°


Introduction: the gold standard for diagnosis of acid reflux in paediatric patients is 24-hour pH monitoring. Ultrasound is a non-invasive technique and few studies have compared it with pH monitoring.Methods: prospective, observational and analytical study. We performed an ultrasound examination in patients in whom pH monitoring was indicated before performance of the latter test. We analysed the sonographic variables proposed by the Ultrasound Group of the SEGHNP (modified Gomes 1991 criteria), with 2 or more abnormal sonographic parameters indicating the presence of pathological acid reflux.Results: the study included 32 patients, 68.8% (n = 22) male, aged 1 month to 13 years. The results of pH monitoring were pathological in 59.3% (n = 19). We did not find an association between the sonographic diagnosis of reflux according to the criteria proposed by SEGHNP and the diagnosis of reflux based on pH monitoring (p = 0.169). We found a sensitivity of 60% and a specificity of 61.5% with the use of ultrasound, with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 70.58% and a negative predictive value of 53.3%. When we compared each ultrasound variable separately to the presence of reflux determined by pH monitoring, we did not find any significant associations. However, we found a statistically significant association between the combination of an angle of His in the pathological range and an abdominal oesophagus length of less than 1.3 cm on ultrasound and the detection of acid reflux by pH monitoring (p = 0.033), with a high PPV, positive likelihood ratio and pre-test probability (88.9%, 5.47 and 89.1%, respectively) and a low false-positive rate (7.7%).Conclusion: in our sample, we did not find an association between the... (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Infant, Newborn , Infant , Child, Preschool , Child , Adolescent , Gastroesophageal Reflux/diagnostic imaging , Ultrasonography , Hydrogen-Ion Concentration , Sensitivity and Specificity , Prospective Studies , Manometry
12.
Rev Gastroenterol Mex (Engl Ed) ; 87(4): 420-431, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34794927

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION AND AIMS: Due to its different clinical manifestations, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) requires diverse diagnostic and therapeutic interventions. The aim of the study was to evaluate the degree of agreement among Latin American specialists, with respect to the management of GERD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted through a survey with 42 statements (22 related to diagnosis and 20 to treatment) applied to 56 specialists from Latin America. There were 4 possible statement responses: in complete agreement, in partial agreement, in partial disagreement, and in complete disagreement. Reproducibility, level of agreement, and concordance were measured through the Kappa statistic. RESULTS: The response rate was 81% (47/56). General concordance was low, given that there was complete concordance in only 12 statements (28.6%). There was partial concordance in 22 statements (52.4%) and no concordance in 8 (19%). The following themes had the most disagreement: the performance of endoscopy before beginning treatment, the use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in patients with extraesophageal symptoms and with no typical symptoms, and the combined use of PPIs and prokinetics. CONCLUSIONS: In the present study, we found that there was agreement among the Latin American specialists for the diagnosis and management of GERD in less than one-third of the recommendations considered standard. The low concordance could be related to the fact that the availability of diagnostic tools and medications, as well as the prevalence of GERD phenotypes, is different in each country.


Subject(s)
Gastroesophageal Reflux , Humans , Cross-Sectional Studies , Reproducibility of Results , Gastroesophageal Reflux/therapy , Gastroesophageal Reflux/drug therapy , Proton Pump Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal
13.
Gac Med Mex ; 158(6): 423-429, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36657136

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: A national survey in the general population showed that gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is highly prevalent in Mexico. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of two isomers, dexrabeprazole (10 mg) vs. esomeprazole (20 mg), in the treatment of GERD for four weeks. METHODS: Randomized, multicenter, prospective, double-blind phase III clinical trial in two groups that included 230 patients. RESULTS: A statistically significant decrease in the severity of GERD symptoms (heartburn, regurgitation, epigastric pain and dysphagia), evaluated using a visual analogue scale, was observed with both treatments. Mean score for dexrabeprazole on Carlsson-Dent questionnaire at 28 days was 2.12, and for esomeprazole, 3.02. Both treatments were effective, with no statistically significant difference being recorded (p < 0.05). On SF-36 health questionnaire, both were observed to improve the quality-of-life score, with no significant difference being identified. Both drugs were well tolerated, and the adverse event incidence profile was low. CONCLUSIONS: In the treatment of non-erosive GERD, the use of dexrabeprazole at 10 mg/day is as effective as esomeprazole 20 mg/day, with the advantage that the dose is lower with an appropriate safety profile.


INTRODUCCIÓN: Una encuesta nacional en población abierta mostró que la enfermedad por reflujo gastroesofágico (ERGE) tiene alta prevalencia en México. OBJETIVO: Comparar la eficacia y seguridad de dos isómeros, dexrabeprazol (10 mg) versus esomeprazol (20 mg), en el tratamiento de la ERGE durante cuatro semanas. MÉTODOS: Ensayo clínico fase III, aleatorizado, multicéntrico, prospectivo, doble ciego, en dos grupos que incluyeron 230 pacientes. RESULTADOS: Con ambos tratamientos se observó disminución estadísticamente significativa en la severidad de los síntomas de ERGE (pirosis, regurgitación, dolor epigástrico y disfagia), evaluados mediante una escala visual análoga. La puntuación promedio de dexrabeprazol en el Cuestionario de Carlsson-Dent a los 28 días fue de 2.12 y la de esomeprazol de 3.02. Ambos tratamientos fueron efectivos, sin diferencia estadísticamente significativa (p < 0.05). En el Cuestionario de Salud SF-36 se observó que ambos mejoraron la puntuación en la calidad de vida, sin diferencia significativa. Ambos medicamentos fueron bien tolerados y el perfil de incidencia de eventos adversos fue bajo. CONCLUSIONES: En el tratamiento de ERGE no erosiva, el uso de 10 mg/día de dexrabeprazol es tan efectivo como 20 mg/día de esomeprazol, con la ventaja de que la dosis es menor con un adecuado perfil de seguridad.


Subject(s)
Esomeprazole , Gastroesophageal Reflux , Humans , Esomeprazole/adverse effects , Rabeprazole/therapeutic use , Prospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Gastroesophageal Reflux/drug therapy
14.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34294483

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION AND AIMS: Due to its different clinical manifestations, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) requires diverse diagnostic and therapeutic interventions. The aim of the study was to evaluate the degree of concordance among Latin American specialists, with respect to the management of GERD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted through a survey with 42 statements (22 related to diagnosis and 20 to treatment) applied to 56 specialists from Latin America. There were 4 possible statement responses: in complete agreement, in partial agreement, in partial disagreement, and in complete disagreement. Reproducibility, level of agreement, and concordance were measured through the Kappa statistic. RESULTS: The response rate was 81% (47/56). General concordance was low, given that there was complete concordance in only 12 statements (28.6%). There was partial concordance in 22 statements (52.4%) and no concordance in 8 (19%). The following themes had the most disagreement: the performance of endoscopy before beginning treatment, the use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in patients with extraesophageal symptoms and with no typical symptoms, and the combined use of PPIs and prokinetics. CONCLUSIONS: In the present study, we found that there was agreement among the Latin American specialists for the diagnosis and management of GERD in less than one-third of the recommendations considered standard. The low concordance could be related to the fact that the availability of diagnostic tools and medications, as well as the prevalence of GERD phenotypes, are different in each country.

15.
Rev. colomb. gastroenterol ; 36(1): 73-80, ene.-mar. 2021. graf
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1251524

ABSTRACT

Resumen La enfermedad por reflujo gastroesofágico (ERGE) se define como el tránsito anormal del contenido gástrico hacia el esófago, que se da por una alteración de la barrera antirreflujo, causando síntomas o complicaciones. Para su correcto diagnóstico y abordaje terapéutico, se requiere de la integración de hallazgos clínicos, endoscópicos y monitorización del pH esofágico en 24 horas con o sin impedanciometría, la cual debe ser realizada con especificaciones técnicas, y su interpretación debe basarse en la mejor evidencia clínica disponible, con el objetivo de tener diagnósticos precisos que permitan tomar las mejores decisiones con los pacientes. Recientemente, en el Consenso de Lyon se han incorporado nuevas directrices para el diagnóstico de ERGE por monitorización de pH esofágico, las cuales se revisan en este artículo.


Abstract Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is defined as the abnormal transit of gastric contents into the esophagus. It is caused by an alteration of the anti-reflux barrier, causing multiple symptoms or complications. In order to achieve accurate diagnosis and proper therapeutic approach, integration of clinical findings, endoscopic findings and 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring, with or without impedancometry, is required. These tests must be performed following technical specifications and their interpretation must be based on the best clinical evidence available to obtain accurate diagnoses that allow making the best decisions to the benefit of patients. Recently, the Lyon Consensus incorporated new guidelines for the diagnosis of GERD by esophageal pH monitoring, which are reviewed in this paper.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Therapeutics , Gastroesophageal Reflux , Electric Impedance , Esophageal pH Monitoring , Disease
16.
Rev. colomb. reumatol ; 27(supl.1): 44-54, Oct.-Dec. 2020. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1341323

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a systemic autoimmune disease in which gastrointestinal manifestations are a frequent complication. Gastrointestinal involvement is present in up to 90 % of patients. The most affected areas are the esophagus and the anorectal tract. Reflux, heartburn and dysmotility are the leading causes of gastrointestinal discomfort. Disordered anorectal function can occur early in the course of SSc and is an important factor in the development of fecal incontinence. Current recommendations to treat gastrointestinal disorders in SSc include the use of proton pump inhibitors, prokinetics and rotating antibiotics. This review discusses the proposed pathophysiological mechanisms, the clinical presentation, the different diagnostic techniques and the current management of the involvement of each section of the gastrointestinal tract in SSc.


RESUMEN La esclerosis sistémica (ES) es una enfermedad autoinmune sistémica en la que las manifestaciones gastrointestinales son una complicación frecuente. El compromiso gastrointestinal está presente hasta en 90% de los pacientes. Las áreas más afectadas son el esófago y el tracto anorrectal. El reflujo, la pirosis y la dismotilidad son las principales causas de malestar gastrointestinal. La función anorrectal alterada puede presentarse temprano en el curso de la ES y es un factor importante en el desarrollo de incontinencia fecal. Las recomendaciones actuales para tratar los trastornos gastrointestinales en la ES incluyen el uso de inhibidores de la bomba de protones, procinéticos y de antibióticos en forma rotativa. Esta revisión discute los mecanismos fisiopatológicos propuestos, la presentación clínica, las diferentes técnicas de diagnóstico y el manejo actual del compromiso de cada sección del tracto gastrointestinal en la ES.


Subject(s)
Humans , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Scleroderma, Systemic , Gastrointestinal Diseases , Autoimmune Diseases , Causality , Diagnosis
17.
Rev. cuba. estomatol ; 57(2): e1775, abr.-jun. 2020. tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS, CUMED | ID: biblio-1126498

ABSTRACT

RESUMEN Introducción: La enfermedad por reflujo gastroesofágico es un trastorno funcional, multifactorial, del tracto gastrointestinal superior. Las alteraciones bucales han sido consideradas como parte de sus manifestaciones extraesofágicas. Objetivo: Determinar las alteraciones bucales encontradas en pacientes con enfermedad por reflujo gastroesofágico. Métodos: Se realizó un estudio observacional descriptivo en 37 pacientes con diagnóstico de enfermedad por reflujo gastroesofágico. Las variables analizadas fueron: edad, sexo, presencia de alteración, signos y síntomas, y localización. Se confeccionó base de datos con registros, se calcularon las frecuencias absolutas y porcentajes. Resultados: El 48,6 por ciento de los pacientes presentó alguna alteración bucal, como sensación de ardor o urente (40,5 por ciento) y eritema (35,1 por ciento). Entre las regiones afectadas se encontraron paladar blando/úvula (72,2 por ciento) y lengua (61,1 por ciento). Conclusiones: Casi la mitad de los pacientes afectados por reflujo gastroesofágico presentó alguna manifestación bucal. Las más frecuentemente encontradas fueron: la sensación de ardor o urente, eritema, sensación de boca seca y ulceraciones. Las localizaciones más frecuentes fueron paladar blando/úvula y lengua(AU)


ABSTRACT Introduction: Gastroesophageal reflux disease is a functional multifactorial disorder of the upper gastrointestinal tract. Oral alterations are considered to be extraesophageal manifestations of this disease. Objective: Determine the oral alterations found in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Methods: An observational descriptive study was conducted of 37 patients diagnosed with gastroesophageal reflux disease. The variables analyzed were age, sex, presence of alteration, signs and symptoms, and location. A database was developed with the information recorded, and absolute frequencies and percentages were estimated. Results: Of the patients studied, 48.6 percent had some sort of oral alteration, such as a burning sensation (40.5 percent) and erythema (35.1 percent). The regions affected included the soft palate / uvula (72.2 percent) and the tongue (61.1 percent). Conclusions: Almost half of the patients affected by gastroesophageal reflux had some sort of oral manifestation, the most common of which were a burning sensation, erythema, a dry mouth sensation and ulcerations. The most common locations were the soft palate / uvula and the tongue(AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Oral Manifestations , Gastroesophageal Reflux/diagnosis , Epidemiology, Descriptive , Observational Studies as Topic
18.
Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 43(6): 310-321, 2020.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32229033

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The clinical impact of head-of-bed elevation in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease is unclear, because of inconsistency and methodological limitations of previous studies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A randomised single-blind single-centre controlled clinical trial with a 2x2 cross-over design, in 39 pharmacologically treated patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Active intervention was to use a head-of-bed-elevation of 20cm for 6 weeks and then to sleep without inclination for 6 additional weeks, with a wash-out of 2 weeks between periods. The primary outcome was a change ≥10% in RDQ score and secondary outcomes were a change ≥10% in SF-36 score, patient preference and frequency of adverse events. RESULTS: 27 (69.2%) patients who used the intervention reached the primary outcome vs 13 (33.3%) patients in the control group (RR: 2.08; 95 CI%: 1.19 - 3.61). No effect was found in SF-36 score (RR: 1.11; 95% CI: 0.47 - 2.60). Preference favouring the intervention was 77.1% and adverse event proportion was 54.0%. CONCLUSION: Head-of-bed elevation improved reflux symptoms but there was no effect on quality of life. The finding of a non-optimal risk-benefit ratio warrants additional studies before this intervention can be recommended (IBELGA, ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02706938).


Subject(s)
Gastroesophageal Reflux/drug therapy , Posture , Adult , Aged , Beds , Cross-Over Studies , Female , Gastroesophageal Reflux/prevention & control , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Single-Blind Method , Sleep
19.
Rev. Fac. Med. Hum ; 20(2): 281-286, abr.- jun. 2020.
Article in English, Spanish | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1120774

ABSTRACT

Objetivo: Determinar la relación entre enfermedad por reflujo gastroesofágico y asma bronquial en población pediátrica en el hospital Nacional del Niño entre los años 2017-2018. Métodos: Se realizó un estudio observacional analítico tipo casos y controles no emparejado de razón 1 caso para 2 controles, con un total de 45 casos y 90 controles, se realizó un muestreo probabilístico aleatorio simple, con una recolección retrospectiva para las variables asma bronquial, ERGE, esofagitis inducida por ERGE, prematuridad, lactancia materna interrumpida, sexo y edad. Se realizó un modelo de regresión logística bivariado y múltiple para la obtención del Odds Ratio para la fuerza de asociación. Resultados: Se encontró una diferencia estadísticamente significativa para ERGE (p=0,002), siendo 33,33% y 11,11% para los casos y controles, así como para lactancia interrumpida (p=0,013); por análisis de regresión logística múltiple las variables ERGE (OR 4,27, p=0,003, IC 1,64-10,92) y lactancia materna interrumpida (OR 2,74, P=0,011, IC 1,26-5,97) presentaron relación para asma bronquial. Conclusión: Se encontró una relación entre ERGE y asma bronquial la cual puede ser extrapolada a la población pediátrica de la ciudad de Lima, este es el primer artículo publicado al respecto a nivel nacional, se recomiendan estudios prospectivos para determinar causalidad.


Objective: To determine the relationship between gastroesophageal reflux disease and bronchial asthma in the pediatric population of the National Children's Hospital Breña headquarters between the years 2017-2018. Methods: An analytical observational study of cases and controls was not matched, with a ratio of 1 case to 2 controls, with a total of 45 cases and 90 controls, a simple random probability sampling was performed, with a retrospective collection for the variables bronchial asthma, GERD, GERD-induced esophagitis, prematurity, interrupted breastfeeding, sex and age. A bivariate and multiple logistic regression model was performed to obtain the Odds Ratio for the strength of association. Results: A statistically significant difference was found for GERD (p = 0.002), being 33.33% and 11.11% for cases and controls, as well as for interrupted lactation (p = 0.013); by multiple logistic regression analysis the variables GERD (OR 4.27, p = 0.003, CI 1.64-10.92) and interrupted breastfeeding (OR 2.74, P = 0.011, CI 1.26-5.97 ) presented a relationship for bronchial asthma. Conclusion: A relationship was found between GERD and bronchial asthma which can be extrapolated to the pediatric population of the city of Lima, this is the first article published in this regard at the national level, prospective studies are recommended to determine causality.

20.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31103135

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is one of the most common diseases, but is still a challenge to cure. Different medical treatments are used, first of all Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), however these are sometimes ineffective and long-term intake can lead to underestimated complications. Recently, some studies investigated the role of inspiratory muscle training (IMT) in the medical treatment of GERD. It seems that IMT is able to increase the pressure generated by the lower oesophageal sphincter (LES), reduce spontaneous releases of LES, acid exposure, use of PPIs, and improve symptoms and quality of life for GERD patients. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of IMT in association with myofunctional therapy exercises of swallowing set by Daniel Garliner (m-IMT) on the symptoms of patients with non-erosive gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (NERD). METHODS: Twenty-one adult patients with NERD were enrolled from May to December 2017 and performed m-IMT over a period of 4 weeks. Before and after treatment, all the patients completed the following questionnaires: GERD oesophageal symptomatology (GERDQ), extra-oesophageal GERD symptomatology (RSI), quality of life (GERD-Health Related Quality of Life Questionnaire (GERD-HRQL), and underwent laryngeal endoscopy. RESULTS: Nineteen patients completed m-IMT. GERDQ (from 8.36±3.94 to 1.7±3.41; p<.05), RSI (from to 21.68±10.26 to 6.93±8.37; p<.05) and GERDHRQL (from 25.68±16.03 to 8.4±11.06; p<.05) the questionnaire scores significantly reduced after treatment. In addition, the laryngeal endoscopy score greatly improved (from 14.24±4.15 to 7.4±1.77; p<.05). CONCLUSIONS: m-IMT is a low cost therapy without side effects. It could be useful in association with PPI or alone for selected GERD cases and for mild NERD forms, in association with diet. Further studies are required to prove the effects of m-IMT on GERD symptoms and decide the best treatment schedule.


Subject(s)
Breathing Exercises/methods , Gastroesophageal Reflux/therapy , Myofunctional Therapy/methods , Adult , Combined Modality Therapy/methods , Esophageal Sphincter, Lower/physiology , Female , Gastroesophageal Reflux/complications , Gastroesophageal Reflux/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Laryngoscopy , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Positioning/methods , Quality of Life , Supine Position/physiology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Symptom Assessment/methods , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...