Self-efficacy and locus of control as transdiagnostic factors in Middle Eastern refugees.

Background: Many refugees report high levels of psychopathology. As a countermeasure, some psychological interventions aim at targeting mental health difficulties in refugees transdiagnostically. However, there is a lack of knowledge about relevant transdiagnostic factors in refugee populations.Objective: To inform intervention efforts empirically, we investigated whether self-efficacy and locus of control are transdiagnostically associated with symptoms of depression, anxiety, somatisation, psychological distress, and a higher-order psychopathology factor ('p') in Middle Eastern refugees residing in Germany.Method: In total, 200 Middle Eastern refugees took part in this cross-sectional study, comprising 160 male and 40 female refugees. Participants were, on average, 25.56 years old (SD = 9.19), and 182 (91%) originally came from Syria, while remaining refugees were from Iraq or Afghanistan. They completed measures of depression, anxiety, somatisation, self-efficacy, and locus of control.Results: In multiple regression models adjusting for demographic factors (gender and age), self-efficacy and external locus of control were transdiagnostically related to depression, anxiety, somatic symptoms, psychological distress, and a higher-order psychopathology factor. Internal locus of control had no detectable effect in these models.Conclusions: Self-efficacy and external locus of control appear critical in the mental health of refugees and may be important mechanisms in overcoming posttraumatic stress and resettlement stressors. Our findings support the need to target self-efficacy and external locus of control as transdiagnostic factors of general psychopathology in Middle Eastern refugees.

Middle Eastern refugees report high levels of psychopathology.Transdiagnostic interventions are often applied, yet knowledge about relevant transdiagnostic factors is scarce.Self-efficacy and external locus of control emerged as relevant transdiagnostic factors.

Anxiety Sensitivity and Tobacco Use: A Transdiagnostic Approach / La sensibilidad a la ansiedad y el consumo de tabaco: un enfoque transdiagnóstico

Background: In recent years, several studies have found a relationship between transdiagnostic variables, such as anxiety sensitivity (AS) and tobacco use and smoking cessation. Method: In this line, the aim was twofold: 1) to analyze sex differences in variables related to tobacco and AS and 2) to examine the mediating effect of AS. For this purpose, the sample consisted of 340 smokers (Mage = 33.59 years, SD = 11.98, 68.5% women). Results: The results showed that men smoked more cigarettes per day and women had higher levels of total, physical, and cognitive AS. The structural equation model confirmed that AS is a mediator variable between the number of cigarettes per day and nicotine dependence, and the number of previous cessation attempts. Conclusions: These findings suggest that transdiagnostic variables, such as AS, and sex differences, must be taken into account in smoking cessation interventions. (AU)

Antecedentes: En los últimos años, diversos estudios han encontrado relación entre variables transdiagnósticas, como la sensibilidad a la ansiedad (SA) y el consumo de tabaco y dejar de fumar. Método: En esta línea, el objetivo ha sido doble: 1) analizar las diferencias de género en variables relacionadas con el tabaco y la SA y 2) examinar el efecto mediador de la SA. Para ello, la muestra consistió en 340 fumadores (Medad = 33.59 años, DT = 11.98, 68.5% mujeres). Resultados: Los resultados mostraron que los hombres fumaban más cigarrillos al día y las mujeres presentaban mayores niveles de SA total, física y cognitiva. El modelo de ecuaciones estructurales confirma que la SA es una variable mediadora entre el número de cigarrillos al día y la dependencia a la nicotina y el número de intentos previos de dejar de fumar. Conclusiones: Estos resultados sugieren que hay que tener en cuenta variables transdiagnósticas como la SA y las diferencias de género en las intervenciones para dejar de fumar. (AU)

Moving beyond psychiatric diagnosis and the medical framework towards social recovery: an interview with Jim van Os / Para além do diagnóstico psiquiátrico e do modelo médico, na busca pelo "recovery" social: uma entrevista com Jim van Os / Au-delà du diagnostic psychiatrique et du modèle médical vers le social recovery: un entretien avec Jim van Os / Más allá del diagnóstico psiquiátrico y del modelo médico hacia en la búsqueda del social recovery: una entrevista con Jim van Os

There is a growing realization in the field of psychiatry that we are unable to free ourselves of the constraints imposed by our concepts, as well as to move beyond them. Thus, the field demands not only more robust empirical evidence but also a more sophisticated conceptual framework, which would allow for critical and innovative thinking to conceive and to build better models of mental health care. In this spirit, we present a very thought-provoking interview with Dutch psychiatrist Jim van Os, encompassing biographical issues from his academic background as well as his ideas on recovery and the Dutch experience of the recovery colleges as a "shadow mental health system" in the Netherlands. Adopting a critical stance on psychiatric diagnosis and the validity of group-level comparisons in evidence-based psychiatry, and in line with the ideals of the recovery movement, van Os points out that the process of healing should surpass symptom reduction. For him, it should take into account the long-term process of developing resilience, learning to deal with suffering through interactions with other people, building up new perspectives, goals, and existential purposes. In other words, he emphasizes the idea of social recovery and favors the thought that mental health professionals should try to "help people to relate better to their mental variation and offer them ways of doing that differently."

Há uma crescente percepção no campo da psiquiatria de que somos incapazes de nos liberar das restrições impostas pelos conceitos do campo, bem como ir além deles. Assim, o campo demanda não somente evidências empíricas mais robustas, mas também um quadro de referências conceituais que permita um pensamento crítico e inovador que conceba e construa modelos mais apropriados de cuidado à saúde mental. Nesse espírito, apresentamos uma entrevista provocativa com o psiquiatria holandês Jim van Os, abrangendo desde questões sobre sua formação acadêmica até suas ideias sobre recovery e sobre a experiência dos recovery colleges na Holanda como "um sistema de saúde mental invisível". Adotando uma posição crítica sobre o diagnóstico psiquiátrico e a validade das comparações grupais preconizadas pela medicina baseada em evidências, e em sintonia com o movimento conhecido como recovery, van Os destaca que o processo de cura deve ir além da redução de sintomas. Para ele, é preciso levar em conta o longo processo de desenvolvimento de resiliência, aprendendo com os outros a lidar com o sofrimento, e construindo novas perspectivas, objetivos e propósitos existenciais. Em outras palavras, a ênfase recai sobre a ideia de social recovery e favorece a ideia de que profissionais de saúde mental devem "ajudar as pessoas a se relacionarem melhor com suas variações psicológicas e oferecer a elas formas diferentes de chegar até isso."

Il y a une perception croissante dans le champ de la psychiatrie selon laquelle nous ne sommes pas en mesure de nous libérer des contraintes imposées par les concepts de ce domaine, encore moins de les dépasser. Ainsi, le champ de la psychiatrie exigerait non seulement des évidences empiriques plus solides, mais aussi un cadre de références conceptuelles procurant une pensée critique et novatrice capable de concevoir et de construire des modèles plus appropriés aux soins de santé mentale. Dans cette démarche, nous présentons un entretien provocateur avec le psychiatre néerlandais Jim van Os, couvrant des questions sur son parcours universitaire, ainsi que ses idées sur le recovery, et sur l'expérience des recovery colleges aux Pays-Bas en tant que « système de santé mentale invisible ¼. C'est en adoptant une démarche critique à l'égard du diagnostic psychiatrique et de la validité des comparaisons de groupes préconisées par la médecine fondée sur les preuves et en accord avec le mouvement connu sous le nom de recovery que van Os souligne que le processus de guérison doit aller au-delà de la réduction des symptômes. Pour lui, il faut prendre en compte le long mouvement de développement de la résilience, de sorte à apprendre d'autrui comment faire face à la souffrance, pour construire de nouvelles perspectives, de nouveaux objectifs et de nouvelles finalités existentielles. Ses contributions soulignent le concept de social recovery et favorisent l'idée selon laquelle les professionnels de la santé mentale devraient «aider les gens à mieux gérer leurs variations psychologiques et leur proposer différentes façons d'y parvenir¼.

Hay una percepción creciente, en el campo de la psiquiatría, de que somos incapaces de librarnos de las restricciones impuestas por los conceptos del campo, así como también de ir más allá de ellas. Por lo tanto, el campo demanda no solamente evidencias empíricas más robustas, sino un marco de referencias conceptuales que permita un pensamiento crítico e innovador que conciba y construya modelos más apropiados de cuidado de la salud mental. En ese sentido, presentamos una provocadora entrevista con el psiquiatra holandés Jim van Os, abarcando, desde cuestiones sobre su formación académica hasta sus ideas sobre recovery y la experiencia de los recovery colleges en Holanda como "un sistema de salud mental invisible". Adoptando una postura crítica sobre el diagnóstico psiquiátrico y la validez de las comparaciones grupales defendidas por la medicina basada en evidencias, y alineado con el movimiento conocido como recovery, van Os destaca que el proceso de curar debe ir más allá de la reducción de los síntomas. Para él, es necesario considerar el largo proceso de desarrollo de la resiliencia, aprendiendo a lidiar con el sufrimiento a través de la interacción con los otros y construyendo nuevas perspectivas, objetivos y propósitos existenciales. En otras palabras, el énfasis recae sobre la idea del social recovery, favoreciendo la noción de que los profesionales de la salud mental deben "ayudar a las personas a relacionarse mejor con sus variaciones psicológicas y ofrecerles diferentes formas para llegar a ello".