Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Publication year range
1.
Infectio ; 24(4): 266-269, oct.-dic. 2020. tab, graf
Article in Spanish | LILACS, COLNAL | ID: biblio-1114881

ABSTRACT

Resumen Introducción: La endocarditis fúngica es una enfermedad infecciosa agresiva e infrecuente, considerada una emergencia en los servicios hospitalarios. Se ha evidenciado una incidencia de 0-12% del total de las admisiones pediátricas por endocarditis infecciosa. La mortalidad por Candida spp se encuentra alrededor del 50-80% en todos los casos. La Candida lusitaniae afecta principalmente a pacientes inmunocomprometidos, con uso de dispositivos intravasculares y el empleo de antibióticos de amplio espectro. Reporte de caso: Se presenta el caso de un lactante menor quien es diagnosticado con fungemia y endocarditis infecciosa por Candida lusitaniae en válvula nativa posterior a cirugía de corrección por transposición de grandes vasos. Discusión y Conclusiones: La endocarditis infecciosa por Candida lusitaniae es una entidad poco frecuente, con una prevalencia menor al 2% constituyéndose un escenario desafiante en la práctica clínica. Se describen las características de un lactante menor quien presentó endocarditis fúngica ya definidas en la literatura mundial. Es imprescindible la detección temprana y una intervención terapéutica vertiginosa; puesto que, la persistencia del inoculo, la resistencia antimicótica y el retraso en el diagnóstico conllevan a una condición amenazante para la vida del paciente.


Abstract Introduction: Fungal infective endocarditis is an aggressive and infrequent disease, considered an emergency in hospital services. Candida mortality is around 50-80% in all cases. The Candida lusitaniae mainly affects immunocompromised patients with chronic venous access and the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. Case report: A minor infant is presented who is diagnosed with fungemia and infective endocarditis due to Candida lusitaniae in a native valve secondary to surgery by transposition of large vessels. Discussion and Conclusions: Candida lusitaniae infectious endocarditis is very rare, with a prevalence of less than 2% constituting a challenging scenario in clinical practice. The characteristics of fungemia and endocarditis already defined in the world literature are described. Early detection and a vertiginous therapeutic intervention are essential, since; latent infection, antifungal resistance and delay in diagnosis lead to a threatening condition for the patient's life.


Subject(s)
Humans , Infant , Candida , Endocarditis , Fungemia , Echinocandins , Infections/complications , Anti-Bacterial Agents
2.
Rev Iberoam Micol ; 33(4): 187-195, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27067875

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although over the past decade the management of invasive fungal infection has improved, considerable controversy persists regarding antifungal prophylaxis in solid organ transplant recipients. AIMS: To identify the key clinical knowledge and make by consensus the high level recommendations required for antifungal prophylaxis in solid organ transplant recipients. METHODS: Spanish prospective questionnaire, which measures consensus through the Delphi technique, was conducted anonymously and by e-mail with 30 national multidisciplinary experts, specialists in invasive fungal infections from six national scientific societies, including intensivists, anesthetists, microbiologists, pharmacologists and specialists in infectious diseases that responded to 12 questions prepared by the coordination group, after an exhaustive review of the literature in the last few years. The level of agreement achieved among experts in each of the categories should be equal to or greater than 70% in order to make a clinical recommendation. In a second term, after extracting the recommendations of the selected topics, a face-to-face meeting was held with more than 60 specialists who were asked to validate the pre-selected recommendations and derived algorithm. MEASUREMENTS AND PRIMARY OUTCOMES: Echinocandin antifungal prophylaxis should be considered in liver transplant with major risk factors (retransplantation, renal failure requiring dialysis after transplantation, pretransplant liver failure, not early reoperation, or MELD>30); heart transplant with hemodialysis, and surgical re-exploration after transplantation; environmental colonization by Aspergillus, or cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection; and pancreas and intestinal transplant in case of acute graft rejection, hemodialysis, initial graft dysfunction, post-perfusion pancreatitis with anastomotic problems or need for laparotomy after transplantation. Antifungal fluconazole prophylaxis should be considered in liver transplant without major risk factors and MELD 20-30, split or living donor, choledochojejunostomy, increased transfusion requirements, renal failure without replacement therapy, early reoperation, or multifocal colonization or infection with Candida; intestinal and pancreas transplant with no risk factors for echinocandin treatment. Liposomal amphotericin B antifungal prophylaxis should be considered in lung transplant (inhalant form) and liver transplant with major risk factors. Antifungal prophylaxis with voriconazole should be considered in lung transplant, and heart transplant with hemodialysis, surgical re-exploration after transplantation, environmental colonization by Aspergillus, or CMV infection. CONCLUSIONS: The management of antifungal prophylaxis in solid organ transplant recipients requires the application of knowledge and skills that are detailed in our recommendations and the algorithm developed therein. These recommendations, based on the DELPHI methodology, may help to identify potential patients, standardize their management and improve overall prognosis.


Subject(s)
Antifungal Agents/therapeutic use , Mycoses/prevention & control , Organ Transplantation , Postoperative Complications/microbiology , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Premedication , Algorithms , Humans , Prospective Studies
3.
Rev. chil. infectol ; 28(5): 399-403, oct. 2011. tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: lil-603075

ABSTRACT

Fungi, particularly yeasts, have become important opportunistic pathogens that can be resistant to antifungal agents or develop resistance. To address this problem, new molecules such as echinocandins, have been developed. Susceptibility to anidulafungin was studied in yeasts isolated previous to the introduction of this drug in Chile. One hundred strains of different yeast species isolated from invasive fungal infections during 2007 and 2008 were studied. Susceptibility testing of anidulafungin was performed by broth microdilution according to CLSI. All strains were susceptible to anidulafungin. MIC50 and MIC90 were 0.125 µg/mL and 1 µg/mL, respectively. Compared to other yeasts, C. parapsilosis showed a slight increase in the MICs for anidulafungin (MIC50, 1 µg/mL, MIC90, 2 µg/mL), but remained within the susceptible range. Both, fluconazole resistant (8) and dose dependant susceptible strains (16) were susceptible to anidulafungin. In vitro, this echinocandin appears to be an effective therapeutic alternative.


Los hongos, especialmente las levaduras, se han transformado en importantes patógenos oportunistas y algunos de ellos tienen o desarrollan resistencia a los antifúngicos. Para enfrentar esta problemática se han desarrollado nuevas moléculas, como las equinocandinas. Este trabajo evaluó la susceptibilidad in vitro a anidula-fungina en levaduras obtenidas previo a la incorporación de este antifúngico en Chile. Para ello, se seleccionaron 100 cepas de diversas especies aisladas de enfermedad fúngica invasora durante los años 2007 y 2008 en Chile, a las cuales se les midió la susceptibilidad in vitro por micro-dilución en caldo para anidulafungina según CLSI. Todas las cepas fueron sensibles a anidulafungina con CIM50 y CIM90 de 0,125 µg/mL y 1 µg/mL, respectivamente. Se detectó un ligero aumento de las CIM en C. parapsilosis respecto a las otras levaduras (CIM50 de 1 µg/mL y CIM90 de 2 µg/mL) considerándose estos valores en el rango de sensibilidad. La correlación de la susceptibilidad frente a fluconazol evidenció que cepas resistentes (n: 8) y sensibles dosis dependientes (n: 16) fueron sensibles a anidulafungina. Esta equinocandina aparece, in vitro, como una alternativa terapeutica efectiva frente a las levaduras aisladas en nuestros pacientes.


Subject(s)
Humans , Antifungal Agents/pharmacology , Candida/drug effects , Echinocandins/pharmacology , Chile , Candida/classification , Candida/isolation & purification , Microbial Sensitivity Tests
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...