Safety of edoxaban for delayed bleeding in gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures with a high risk of bleeding.

Objectives: There are limited reports on the safety of gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures in individuals taking edoxaban, one of the direct oral anticoagulants. We clarified the incidence of delayed bleeding in patients who were on edoxaban in the perioperative period of gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures with a high risk of bleeding. Methods: This was an investigator-initiated, single-center, open-label, prospective, single-arm study. Patients on warfarin or edoxaban undergoing endoscopy with a high risk of bleeding were enrolled from June 2018 to September 2021. Warfarin was replaced with edoxaban in patients on warfarin. Patients taking other direct oral anticoagulants, and antiplatelet drugs, were excluded. The primary endpoint was severe delayed bleeding (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [CTCAE] grades III-V) and the secondary endpoints included thromboembolism, all adverse events, any delayed bleeding (CTCAE grades I or II), and hospital stay durations. Results: Twenty-one patients on edoxaban underwent high-risk endoscopy. Three cases (14%) experienced CTCAE grade III delayed bleeding, requiring endoscopic hemostasis. No CTCAE grade I-II delayed bleeding or thromboembolic events occurred. Cholangitis and aspiration pneumonia (conservatively treated) occurred during the hospital stay. The median length of hospital stay was 8 days (range 3-24 days). Patients with delayed bleeding had higher systolic blood pressure at admission and longer hospital stays. Conclusions: The delayed bleeding incidence in high-risk endoscopic procedures for patients on edoxaban was acceptable. Higher blood pressure may be associated with increased risk, but further research is needed.

Effect of spray COAG mode on hemostasis in colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection using inverse probability of treatment weight analysis.

Objective: Swift and forced COAG with an electrosurgical knife are commonly used for intraoperative hemostasis in colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). If bleeding cannot be stopped using an electrosurgical knife, cauterization is attempted using hemostatic forceps. Since April 2022, our hospital has started using Spray COAG for intraoperative hemostasis for colorectal ESD. This study aimed to provide evidence of the efficacy of Spray COAG for intraoperative hemostasis. Methods: Colorectal ESD was performed for 320 lesions at our hospital. Of these, 307 were included; 145 and 162 lesions were operated before and after the introduction of Spray COAG, respectively. Spray COAG was used after the change. The primary endpoint was the change in the frequency of use of hemostatic forceps after the introduction of Spray COAG; the secondary endpoint was the change in the prevalence of postoperative complications after the introduction of Spray COAG. It should be noted that the Spray COAG mode was employed solely for hemostasis and not for dissection, while the Swift COAG mode was utilized for dissection in the After Spray COAG group. Statistical analysis was conducted using IPTW analysis. Results: The frequency of use of hemostatic forceps was significantly decreased after the introduction of Spray COAG (odds ratio = 0.12, 95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 0.06-0.23, p < 0.001). The prevalence of post-ESD electrocoagulation syndrome significantly decreased (odds ratio = 0.43, 95%CI: 0.22-0.88, p = 0.02). No significant differences were observed between the intraoperative and postoperative perforations or rate of postoperative bleeding. Conclusion: Spray COAG reduced the frequency of hemostatic forceps use in colorectal ESD.

Prediction of post-ESD esophageal stricture by a nomogram and risk factor analysis of ineffective oral steroids prophylaxis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Several risk models for esophageal stricture after endoscopic submucosal dissection have been developed. However, some of them did not include the use of steroids in the risk analysis. Glucocorticoid sensitivity mediated by glucocorticoid receptor expression has not been discussed in this condition. METHODS: Clinical and endoscopic characteristics were included in the logistic regression model to establish a nomogram for stenosis prediction. The score for each risk factor was estimated. Risk factors of ineffective oral steroid prophylaxis were analyzed and glucocorticoid receptor expressions were detected by immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: Three hundred fourteen patients of endoscopic submucosal dissection for esophageal superficial neoplasms were included to develop the nomogram. The circumferential range(≤ 3/4, 3/4-1 or the whole circumference), longitudinal diameter reached 4 cm (yes or not) and lesion location (the cervical and upper thoracic part, the middle thoracic part or the lower thoracic part) consisted of the nomogram. Patients have a high risk of esophageal stricture if they have a total point greater than 36. In the simplified risk score model, the corresponding cutoff score was 1. 92 patients with oral steroid prophylaxis were separately analyzed and the circumferential mucosal defect involving 7/8 or more was an independent risk factor of ineffective prevention (OR 12.2, 95%CI 5.27-28.11). The expression of glucocorticoid receptor ß was higher in the stricture group (p = 0.042 for AOD; p = 0.016 for the scoring system). CONCLUSIONS: We established a nomogram for esophageal stricture prediction. Depending on the characteristics of lesions, it is possible to estimate the risk of stricture under routine post-ESD treatments (no steroids or oral steroids). Alternative treatments should be considered if the risk is extremely high, especially for patients with mucosal defects involving 7/8 or more of circumference in which oral steroid treatment tends to be ineffective. The higher glucocorticoid receptor ß may indicate potential glucocorticoid resistance.

Clinical efficacy analysis of endoscopic band electrocision ligation surgical method in the treatment of small submucosal tumors of the gastric fundus.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare and analyze the clinical effects of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and endoscopic band electrocision ligation (EEL) in the removal of gastric submucosal tumors (SMTs). METHOD: We analyzed the clinical data of 130 patients with gastrointestinal SMTs (diameter ≤10 mm) who underwent endoscopic resection, including 62 cases in the EEL group and 68 in the ESD group, and compared indicators such as surgical time, intraoperative and postoperative complications, postoperative hospital stay, and surgical cost, between the EEL and ESD group. RESULTS: EEL surgery time (8.9 ± 1.1 min) was significantly shorter than the ESD group (62.3 ± 2.8 min) (p < .05), EEL surgery cost (5126.8 ± 26.5 yuan) was significantly lower than the ESD group (15721.3 ± 39.6 yuan) (p < .05), and intraoperative blood loss was also markedly lower in the EEL group (5.6 ± 1.7 ml) compared to the ESD group (42.3 ± 3.5 ml) (p < .05). There was no statistically significant difference in postoperative hospitalization time or postoperative complication incidence between the two groups (p > .05). CONCLUSIONS: In treating gastric muscular, mucosal, or submucosal tumors with a diameter of less than 10 mm, the EEL surgical method was superior to the ESD surgical method in terms of surgical time, intraoperative blood loss, and cost. There was no difference in hospital stay and postoperative complication rate between the two methods, which was worthy of clinical application.

Experimental study of magnetic hydrogel assisted magnetic anchorguided endoscopic submucosal dissection in colonic tumors.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a well-established treatment for gastrointestinal tumors and enables en bloc resection. Adequate counter traction with good visualization is important for safe and effective dissection. OBJECTIVE: Based on magnetic anchor-guided endoscopic submucosal dissection (MAG-ESD), we would like to explore the feasibility of magnetic hydrogel as an internal magnetic anchor that can be injected into the submucosa through an endoscopic needle to assist colonic endoscopic submucosal dissection. METHODS: This prospective trial was conducted on 20 porcine colons ex vivo. We injected magnetic hydrogel into submucosa of the porcine colons ex vivo for MAG-ESD to evaluate the traction effect and operation satisfaction. RESULTS: Magnetic hydrogel assisted ESD was successfully performed on 20 porcine colons ex vivo. Adequate counter traction with good visualization was successfully obtained during the procedure of dissection. CONCLUSION: Magnetic hydrogel assisted MAG-ESD is feasible and effective.

Endoscopic ultrasound classification for prediction of endoscopic submucosal dissection resectability: PREDICT classification.

Background and study aims The safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been reported, and the risk of lymph node metastasis is low for colorectal cancer if depth of invasion is the only non-curative factor on histological evaluation. ESD is increasingly performed even if submucosal (SM) invasion is suspected. However, reports about endoscopic findings for the criteria to predict ESD resectability remain limited. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) can directly visualize the tomographic image of the gastrointestinal wall and may help predict ESD resectability. Therefore, we investigated the possibility of predicting ESD resectability using EUS. Patients and methods We compared the association between EUS findings and pathological results for gastric or colorectal lesions with suspected SM invasion using white light endoscopy between June 2020 and January 2023. EUS findings were grouped based on the status of the underlying the tumor, as follows: Type I, submucosal layer was observed with reproducibility; Type II, submucosal layer not fully visible; and Type III, submucosal layer disrupted and muscularis propria (MP) layer thickened. Results Forty-one gastric cancer and 22 colorectal cancer cases were analyzed. The proportions of pathological VM0 (no tumor exposed on any vertical margin) for ESD-resected specimens were 89% and 33% for Type I and II, respectively, ( P ≤ 0.01). The proportions of cancer involving MP or deeper were significantly higher for Type II/III than for Type I (41% vs 0%, P ≤ 0.01). Conclusions EUS may have an important role in predicting ESD resectability of gastric and colorectal cancers suspected of having SM invasion.

Vonoprazan vs. Proton Pump Inhibitors for Treatment and Prevention of Gastric and/or Duodenal Ulcers: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Although Vonoprazan, a potassium-competitive acid blocker, is superior to proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in treating Helicobacter pylori and erosive esophagitis, its efficacy for treating gastric and/or duodenal ulcers remains controversial. This meta-analysis summarizes the efficacy and safety of Vonoprazan vs. PPI for treating and preventing gastric and/or duodenal ulcers. METHODS: Only randomized controlled trials randomizing gastric and/or duodenal ulcer patients, regardless of etiology, into Vonoprazan or any PPI and indexed in Embase, Medline, and CENTRAL until March 2, 2024 were searched. Primary outcomes were ulcer healing rates at Weeks 2, 4, 6, and 8 and recurrence rates at Week 24. Other outcomes included shrinkage rates, any adverse events (AEs), serious AEs (SAEs), and risks of delayed bleeding and perforation. The overall risk ratio (RR) and mean difference were pooled using the random-effects model. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 (RoB2) Tool. RESULTS: Fifteen studies comprising 43 reports were included in the analysis. Healing rates of gastric and/or duodenal ulcers were similar in both Vonoprazan and PPI groups at all weeks (Week 2 RR 1.02 [95% CI 0.89-1.16]; Week 4 0.99 [95% CI 0.95-1.04]; Week 6 1.00 [95% CI 0.96-1.03]; Week 8 0.99 [95% CI 0.95-1.03]). The recurrence prevention of peptic ulcers was not different in Vonoprazan 10 mg (RR 0.48; 95% CI 0.18-1.27) or 20 mg (0.60; 95% CI 0.28-1.30) to PPI. Shrinkage rates, any AEs, SAEs, and risks of delayed bleeding and perforation were similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: Vonoprazan is not significantly better than PPI in treating and preventing gastric and/or duodenal ulcers.

Usefulness of an ultrathin endoscope in esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Background and study aims Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is sometimes challenging because of stenosis and scarring. We examined the use of an ultrathin endoscope for esophageal ESD, which is difficult using conventional endoscopes. Patients and methods A designated transparent hood and ESD knife for ultrathin endoscopes have been developed and clinically introduced. Esophageal ESD was performed on 303 lesions in 220 patients in our hospital from February 2021 to February 2023. Of them, an ultrathin endoscope was used on 26 lesions in 23 cases. The safety and utility of an ultrathin endoscope in esophageal ESD were retrospectively verified. Results All 26 lesions were resected en bloc, and serious complications such as perforation, massive bleeding, or pneumonia, were not observed. Lesions were found on the anal side of the stenosis and over the scarring in 38.6% (10/26) and 50% (13/26) of participants, respectively. Moreover, 46.2% of participants (12/26) had lesions on the cervical esophagus. The total procedure time was 64.1 ± 37.7 minutes, but the average time from oral incision to pocket creation was 121.2 ± 109.9 seconds. Conclusions Ultrathin endoscopes may be useful for difficult esophageal ESD.

Efficacy and safety of radial incision and cutting for nonsurgical refractory benign esophageal stricture.

Background and study aims Radial incision and cutting (RIC) was established to improve refractory esophageal anastomotic strictures but its efficacy and safety for nonsurgical refractory strictures remain unclear. To evaluate the usefulness of RIC in nonsurgical refractory strictures, we retrospectively compared outcomes between nonsurgical and surgical strictures. Patients and methods We retrospectively studied 54 consecutive patients who were initially treated with RIC for refractory benign esophageal stricture. The study variables included dysphasia score improvement rate, frequency of repeated RIC, cumulative patency rate, cumulative stricture improved rate, and adverse events(AEs), which were compared between nonsurgical (n = 21) and surgical (n = 33) stricture groups. Results Immediately after RIC, 90.5% of patients in the nonsurgical group and 84.8% of patients in the surgical group had improvement in dysphagia ( P = 0.69). The frequency of intervening repeated RIC was 42.9% in the nonsurgical group and 42.4% in the surgical group ( P = 0.98). During median follow-up of 22.3 months (range, 1.0-175.0), the cumulative patency rate ( P = 0.23) and cumulative stricture improvement rate ( P = 0.14) but there was not statistical difference between the two groups. Despite a low cumulative stricture improvement rate (9.5%) at 6 months after the first RIC in the nonsurgical group, 57.7% of patients no longer required endoscopic balloon dilatation at 2 years. The cumulative stricture improvement rate was significantly lower in patients with a history of radiation therapy. No severe AEs were observed in the nonsurgical group. Conclusions RIC for nonsurgical refractory benign esophageal stricture is an effective and safe treatment option.

Endoscopic submucosal resection (ESD) and endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) via balloon-assisted enteroscopy (BAE) in small bowel subepithelial lesions: experience in treating fifteen cases.

AIM: The study objective was to evaluate the primary feasibility of endoscopic submucosal resection (ESD) and endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) via balloon-assisted enteroscopy (BAE) to treat small bowel subepithelial lesions (SELs). METHOD: A retrospective case series study was performed. The first fifteen consecutive patients who underwent ESD (n = 10) and EFTR (n = 5) via BAE to remove small bowel SELs from November 2016 to December 2023 were included. The main outcome measures were the technique success rate, operative time and complication rate. RESULTS: This research focused on 15 cases of jejunoileal SELs, four cases of lipomyoma, three cases of ectopic pancreas, two cases of NETs, three cases of benign fibrous tumours and three cases of angioma. The overall technique success rate was 86.7%, with 100% (10/10) and 60% (3/5) for BAE-ESD and BAE-EFTR, respectively, in removing small bowel SELs. Two cases of EFTR failed, as the BAE operation was unsuitable for tumour resection and suture repair of a perforated wound. No serious bleeding or any postoperative complications occurred. The median time of endoscopic resection via BAE for SELs was 44 min (range 22-68 min). CONCLUSION: ESD and EFTR via BAE might be alternative choices for treating small SELs in the small bowel, with the advantages of clear and accurate positioning and minimal invasiveness. However, its superiority over surgery still needs to be further investigated.

Lymphovascular invasion is a dominant risk factor for lymph node metastasis in T2 rectal cancer.

Background and study aims Surgical resection is standard treatment of T2 rectal cancer due to risk of concomitant lymph node metastases (LNM). Local resection could potentially be an alternative to surgical treatment in a subgroup of patients with low risk of LNM. The aim of this study was to identify clinical and histopathological risk factors of LNM in T2 rectal cancer. Patients and methods This was a retrospective registry-based population study on prospectively collected data on all patients with T2 rectal cancer undergoing surgical resection in Sweden between 2009 and 2021. Potential risk factors of LNM, including age, gender, resection margin, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), histologic grade, mucinous cancer, and perineural invasion (PNI) were analyzed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression. Results Of 1607 patients, 343 (21%) with T2 rectal cancer had LNM. LVI (odds ratio [OR] = 4.21, P < 0.001) and age < 60 years (OR = 1.80, P < 0.001) were significant and independent risk factors. However, PNI (OR = 1.50, P = 0.15), mucinous cancer (OR = 1.14, P = 0.60), histologic grade (OR = 1.47, P = 0.07) and non-radical resection margin (OR = 1.64, P = 0.38) were not significant risk factors for LNM in multivariate analyses. The incidence of LNM was 15% in the absence of any risk factor. Conclusions This was a large study on LNM in T2 rectal cancer which showed that LVI is the dominant risk factor. Moreover, low age constituted an independent risk factor, whereas gender, resection margin, PNI, histologic grade, and mucinous cancer were not independent risk factors of LNM. Thus, these findings may provide a useful basis for management of patients after local resection of early rectal cancer.

Clinical audit of endoscopic sub-mucosal dissection performed for complex lateral spreading colorectal tumors from a region non-endemic for colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic resection is currently the treatment of choice for laterally spreading tumors (LSTs). Endoscopic sub-mucosal dissection (ESD) can achieve higher enbloc resection and R0 resection, albeit at a slightly higher risk of complications. Given scarce data on ESD from India, we performed a retrospective analysis of our experience with colorectal ESD (CR-ESD) to know its clinical efficacy and complications as well as to assess the learning curve of CR-ESD in non-endemic-areas. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of prospectively maintained datasheet performed. All patients with large (>2cm), complex or recurrent colorectal LST who underwent ESD at our center between 2012 and 2021 were included in the study. Various baseline lesion-related parameters, procedure-related parameters, enbloc resection (ER) rates, R0 margins and adverse event rates were retrieved. CUSUM analysis was performed to calculate the minimum required procedures to achieve competency in CR-ESD. RESULTS: Total 149 patients were included in the study; mean patient age was 61.36±18.21 years. Most patients had lesions in rectum (n=102; 68.5%) followed by sigmoid colon (n=25; 16.8%). The mean lesion size was 46.62 ± 25.46 mm and the mean procedure duration for ESD was 219.30 ± 150.05 min. ER was achieved in 94.6% of lesions. R0 resection was achieved in 132 patients (88.6%). Overall, six (4%) adverse events were noted, of which one required surgical intervention. As many as 105 patients (70.5%) had adenomatous lesions on histology. Seventy-four patients underwent follow-up colonoscopy, of which three had a recurrence of adenomatous lesions and five had post-resection stricture requiring endoscopic dilation. CUSUM curve analysis calculated the learning curve for ESD was 47 resections for ER and 55 for the occurrence of AEs, with a composite CUSUM at 47 procedures. CONCLUSION: CR-ESD even in non-endemic area is associated with high en bloc resection rates, R0 resection rates and acceptable complication profile. Approximately 50 cases of CR-ESD are required to achieve competency.

The Derivation and External Validation of a Fibrosis Risk Model for Colorectal Tumours Undergoing Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection.

Background: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is an advanced technique that can become more challenging in the presence of submucosal fibrosis. Predicting the grade of fibrosis is important in order to identify technically difficult ESD. Aims and Methods: Our study aimed to derive and validate a prediction model to determine the preoperative degree of submucosal fibrosis in colorectal tumours undergoing ESD. A predictive model was developed to derive the probability of an increasing submucosal fibrosis in the derivation cohort and then externally validated. Results: 309 patients (age: 68 ± 10.9 years) underwent colorectal ESD between January 2016 and June 2020. F0, F1, and F2 fibroses were reported in 196 (63.4%), 70 (22.6%), and 43 (13.9%) cases, respectively. R0 resection was found in 266 (87%) lesions. At multivariable analysis in the derivation cohort, lesion morphology (OR = 0.37 and CI = 0.14-0.97 for LST-NG vs. 0-Is; OR = 0.29 and CI = 0.1-0.87 for the LST mixed type vs. 0-Is; and OR = 0.32 and CI = 0.1-1.03 for LST-G vs. 0-Is) and increasing size (OR = 1.02 and CI = 1.01-1.04 for a 1 mm increase) were significantly associated with an increasing degree of fibrosis. The model had fair discriminating ability in the derivation group (AUROC = 0.61 and CI = 0.52-0.69 for F1-F2 vs. F0 fibroses; AUROC = 0.61 and CI = 0.45-0.77 for F2 vs. F0-F1 fibroses) and in the validation group (AUROC = 0.71 and CI = 0.59-0.83 for F1-F2 vs. F0 fibroses; AUROC = 0.65 and CI = 0.52-0.77 for F2 vs. F0-F1 fibroses). Conclusions: Our findings introduce a new tool for the stratification of ESD technical difficulty based on lesion size and morphological characteristics which could become crucial during the procedure's planning process.

Traction-Assisted Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of a Gastric Subepithelial Tumor: A Case Report.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is considered curative for patients with early gastrointestinal cancers. However, it is a technically challenging procedure that can be time-consuming and associated with complications such as bleeding and perforation. Traction devices and techniques have been developed to mitigate these risks and reduce procedure times. Most traction devices are unavailable in New Zealand, and traction techniques have not been widely utilized due to the precision required for successful outcomes. We report the first case of traction-assisted ESD performed in New Zealand for a gastric submucosal tumor. The procedure was successfully performed using the clip with rubber band traction technique. The lesion was resected en bloc, and histology confirmed an R0, curative resection. There were no complications, and the total procedure time was 54 minutes. In conclusion, traction techniques can be effectively employed for ESD in lesions with difficult submucosal access. They contribute to safer dissections and reduced procedure times.

Outcome after colorectal full-thickness resection and management of recurrence.

Background and study aims Endoscopic full-thickness resection (eFTR) allows treatment of "difficult to resect" lesions not amenable to conventional endoscopic methods. Efficacy and safety of the system have already been proven in numerous studies. Follow-up data on outcome of colorectal eFTR and management of recurrences are still rare. Patients and methods All patients undergoing colorectal eFTR at our institution with at least one endoscopic follow-up examination were retrospectively analyzed. The primary endpoint was the rate of recurrent or residual lesions (RRLs) and the secondary endpoint was the rate of late adverse events (AEs). We further aimed to identify risk factors for RRLs and to describe their management. Results Between November 2014 and 2021, 141 patients underwent eFTR at University Medical Center Freiburg. Ninety-one patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Indications for eFTR were non-lifting adenoma (n = 65), subepithelial tumors (n = 18) and early carcinoma (n = 8). The median follow-up period was 17 months (range, 2-86). The overall RRL rate was 9.9% (9/91). A significant proportion of RRLs (6/9, 66%) were detected late. All RRLs occurred in the group of non-lifting adenoma, corresponding to a RRL rate of 13.8% in this subgroup. Thirty-three percent (3/9) were initially treated by hybrid eFTR. Of the RRLs, 66.6% could were successfully treated endoscopically. On χ2 analysis, the hybrid eFTR technique ( P = 0.006) was associated with a higher rate of RRL. No late AEs occurred. Conclusions The rate of RRL after colorectal eFTR is low and the majority could be treated endoscopically. For non-lifting adenomas and early carcinomas, close follow-up is mandatory to detect late recurrence. Long-term outcomes after hybrid eFTR need further investigation.

Endoscopic removal of gastrointestinal lesions by using third space endoscopy techniques.

The concept of submucosal space, or rather the "third space", located between the intact mucosal flap and the muscularis propria layer of the gastrointestinal tract, represents a tunnel that the endoscopist could use to perform interventions in the muscularis propria layer or breech it to enter the mediastinum or the peritoneal cavity without full thickness perforation. The tunnel technique can be used both for the removal of mucosal tumours, called endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection (ESTD), for the removal of subepithelial tumours (SELs), called submucosal tunnelling endoscopic resection (STER), and for the removal of extra-luminal lesions (for example in the mediastinum or in the rectum), called submucosal tunnelling endoscopic resection for extraluminal tumours (STER-ET). Aim of this updated narrative review, is to summarize the evidences that analyses indications, and outcomes of tunnelling techniques for the treatment of above mentioned lesions.

Navigating the learning landscape: Comprehensive training in third space endoscopy - training, techniques, and practical recommendations.

Third space endoscopy (TSE), including ESD, POEM, or STER are advanced procedures requiring precise endoscopic control and tissue recognition. Despite its increasing adoption, evidence-based curricula, and standardized training protocols for TSE are lacking. This review explores training methods, cognitive skills, and technical proficiency requirements for endoscopists performing TSE, with a primary emphasis on POEM. Generally, it seems wise to recommend a step-up approach to TSE training, starting with ex-vivo models or POEM simulators; mechanical and virtual reality (VR) simulators are commonly used during early training. Preclinical training involving ex-vivo and live animal models is suggested to prepare trainees for safe and effective procedures. Studies suggest varying numbers of procedures for training, with approximately 20-40 cases needed before a first plateau is achieved in terms of complications and speed. The duration of on-patient clinical training varies depending on prior experience. Mentorship programs, workshops, and case discussions may facilitate dynamic knowledge transfer. In addition, adverse event management is a crucial aspect of any TSE training program. Existing evidence supports the use of preclinical models and emphasizes the importance of specialized training programs for TSE in alignment with our proposed step-up training approach. This review outlines practical recommendations for the theoretical knowledge and technical skills required before commencing TSE training, covering clinical understanding, diagnostic and outcome assessment, procedural requirements, and the role of mentorship programs.

Transcecal endoscopic appendectomy for management of complex appendiceal polyps extending into the appendiceal orifice.

Background and study aims Endoscopic resection of appendiceal orifice (AO) polyps extending inside the appendiceal lumen is challenging given the inability to determine polyp lateral margins and risk of appendicitis. Transcecal endoscopic appendectomy (TEA) ensures en bloc resection of these complex polyps. Patients and methods This case series includes patients who underwent TEA by a single endoscopist in the United States. Technical success was defined as achieving complete removal of the appendix along with AO polyp in an en bloc fashion. Results In total, nine patients were included (mean age 69.7 ± 9.6 years). The average appendix size was 4.07 ± 2.02 cm. Technical success was achieved in 100% of the patients. The average procedure length was 118.1 ± 44.21 minutes. The en bloc resection rate, R0 resection rate, and curative resection rates were 100%. Patients were observed for an average of 3.1 ± 1.6 days. One patient developed loculated fluid collection 9 days post procedure, which resolved on its own with oral antibiotic therapy. No other adverse events were recorded. Conclusions This was an early study of the feasibility of TEA in the United States. This novel technique, in early-stage development, is potentially safe and associated with a minimal risk profile in expert hands. Further prospective studies are needed to standardize the technique.

Loop9 closure technique for mucosal defects after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (with video).

Background and study aims Mucosal defect closure after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has the potential to reduce the occurrence of delayed adverse events (AEs) such as bleeding and perforation. This study aimed to assess the feasibility and effectiveness of the Loop9 method for closing mucosal defects following colorectal ESD. Patients and methods A retrospective single-center study was conducted using prospectively collected data from May 2020 to March 2023. Loop9 was deployed through a single instrument channel and anchored with clips at the defect site. Closure was accomplished by tightening the loop and deploying additional conventional clips as needed for complete closure. The primary outcome was complete closure rate, with secondary outcomes including the sustained closure rate at 4 to 5 days post-ESD, closed defect size, closure time, number of additional clips, and incidence of delayed AEs. Results This study included 118 cases. Complete closure was achieved in 96.6% of cases (114/118) with a sustained closure rate of 93.9% (107/114). The median size of the closed mucosal defects was 30 mm (interquartile range [IQR]: 25-38, range: 15-74). The median closure time was 14 minutes (IQR: 11.25-17), and the median number of additional clips deployed was six (IQR: 4-7). Stenosis requiring balloon dilatation was observed in one patient; however, there were no instances of post-ESD bleeding or delayed perforation. Conclusions The Loop9 method proved feasible and effective for closing mucosal defects following colorectal ESD, achieving high rates of complete and sustained closure.