ABSTRACT
Introducción: Desde los inicios de este siglo se ha producido un notable incremento mundial de la tasa de incidencia del cáncer de tiroides, el cual generalmente tiene un curso larvado y asintomático. Objetivo: Profundizar en el conocimiento de los aspectos novedosos del diagnóstico oportuno y tratamiento personalizado del cáncer tiroideo. Desarrollo: El cáncer tiroideo es la enfermedad maligna más frecuente del sistema endocrino. En las últimas décadas, su incidencia se ha incrementado aceleradamente, aunque la mortalidad se ha mantenido baja. El descubrimiento y desarrollo de nuevas técnicas de imágenes, inmunológicas y moleculares, han permitido estudiar en profundidad la neoplasia de la tiroides. Esto ha favorecido avanzar en los aspectos que más han modificado la nueva actitud respecto al diagnóstico oportuno y su tratamiento. Conclusiones: En años recientes, los avances de las investigaciones básicas, clínicas y traslacionales (aplicación real de los conocimientos básicos en la práctica clínica), han transformado antiguos conceptos relacionados con el cáncer tiroideo y han dotado de nuevas herramientas para el diagnóstico oportuno y tratamiento personalizado.
Introduction: Since the beginning of this century there has been a notable increase worldwide in the incidence rate of thyroid cancer, which generally has a latent and asymptomatic course. Objectives: To deepen the knowledge of the novel aspects of timely diagnosis and treatment of thyroid cancer. Development: Thyroid cancer is the most frequent malignant disease of the endocrine system. In recent decades, its incidence has increased rapidly, although mortality has remained low. The discovery and development of new imaging, immunological and molecular techniques have made it possible to study thyroid neoplasm in depth. This has favored advancing in the aspects that have most modified the new attitude regarding timely diagnosis and its treatment. Conclusions: In recent years, advances in basic, clinical and translational research have transformed old concepts related to thyroid cancer and have equipped with new tools for timely diagnosis and personalized treatment.
ABSTRACT
Objetivo: Evaluar los patrones de práctica clínica de urólogos portugueses en el manejo de pacientes incluidos en un protocolo de vigilancia activa.IntroducciónEl cáncer de próstata (CaP) es una enfermedad heterogénea, con un alto porcentaje de adenocarcinomas indolentes y con una probabilidad baja de convertirse en una enfermedad sintomática o potencialmente mortal. La vigilancia activa (VA) es una forma de tratamiento conservador, empleado con el objetivo de limitar el sobretratamiento de los pacientes con CaP de bajo riesgo. A lo largo de los años, la experiencia con VA ha ido aumentado considerablemente, siendo actualmente el manejo estándar en algunos países. Sin embargo, no existe, a día de hoy, un protocolo universal.MétodosEncuesta electrónica anónima de ámbito nacional, sobre los hábitos y prácticas en materia de VA entre urólogos portugueses. La encuesta constaba de 12preguntas y fue enviada por vía electrónica a los 368 miembros actuales de la Asociación Portuguesa de Urología.ResultadosSe encuestó a 56 urólogos (15,21% de respuestas), distribuidos geográficamente de manera uniforme y categorizados según los años de experiencia y el número de pacientes con CaP tratados mensualmente. La gran mayoría de los encuestados recomienda la VA a sus pacientes, en particular en el caso de pacientes de grado 1 de la ISUP, con un nivel sérico de PSA es inferior a 20 ng/ml. No se cuestiona el cumplimiento de los programas de VA por parte de los pacientes, pero la morbilidad psicológica de albergar la enfermedad es un factor preocupante. Según la mayoría de los encuestados, los protocolos de vigilancia propuestos por las guías internacionales son adecuados y suficientes, pero se ponen de manifiesto algunas limitaciones en cuanto a la disponibilidad de la resonancia magnética de forma periódica y al requerimiento de nuevas biopsias (AU)
Objectiv: To examine clinical practice patterns in locally managing patients under an active surveillance protocol among Portuguese urologists.IntroductionProstate cancer (PCa) is a heterogeneous disease with many prostate adenocarcinomas being indolent and a low probability of ever causing symptoms or death. Active surveillance (AS) is a form of conservative management aimed to reduce over-treatment for low-risk PCa patients. Over the years, experience with AS has grown considerably and is now standard in some countries, however a universal protocol still does not exist.MethodsNationwide anonymous e-survey concerning habits and practices on AS among Portuguese urologists, that consisted of 12questions and was sent electronically to all 368 current members of the Portuguese Urological Association.Results56 urologists were surveyed (15.21% answer rate), evenly distributed geographically and allocated according to years of experience as well as number of PCa patients managed monthly. The vast majority of respondents recommends AS to their patients, particularly ISUP grade 1 patients, whose PSA serum level is bellow 20ng/mL. Observance of AS programs by patients was not in question but concerns exist over psychological morbidity while harboring disease. Majority believed that international guidelines surveillance protocols were adequate and sufficient, but there are some constraints concerning availability of periodic MRIs and re-biopsy needs (AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Watchful Waiting , Urologists/statistics & numerical data , Prostatic Neoplasms/therapy , Surveillance in Disasters , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Surveys and Questionnaires , Portugal , BiopsyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To examine clinical practice patterns in locally managing patients under an active surveillance protocol among Portuguese urologists. INTRODUCTION: Prostate cancer (PCa) is a heterogeneous disease with many prostate adenocarcinomas being indolent and a low probability of ever causing symptoms or death. Active surveillance (AS) is a form of conservative management aimed to reduce over-treatment for low-risk PCa patients. Over the years, experience with AS has grown considerably and is now standard in some countries, however a universal protocol still does not exist. METHODS: Nationwide anonymous e-survey concerning habits and practices on AS among Portuguese urologists, that consisted of twelve questions and was sent electronically to all 368 current members of the Portuguese Urological Association. RESULTS: 56 urologists were surveyed (15.21% answer rate), evenly distributed geographically and allocated according to years of experience as well as number of PCa patients managed monthly. The vast majority of respondents recommends AS to their patients, particularly ISUP grade 1 patients, whose PSA serum level is bellow 20 ng/mL. Observance of AS programs by patients was not in question but concerns exist over psychological morbidity while harboring disease. Majority believed that international guidelines surveillance protocols were adequate and sufficient, but there are some constraints concerning availability of periodic MRIs and re-biopsy needs. CONCLUSIONS: AS seems to be sustained in urologist clinical practice, although patients still lag to adhere and choose for active treatment. AS may not be an easy choice for patients and clinicians due to uncertainty of disease progression, risk of loss to follow-up and repeated biopsies but is also a cause for anxiety, depression, uncertainty and a perception of danger.
Subject(s)
Prostatic Neoplasms , Watchful Waiting , Biopsy , Humans , Male , Portugal/epidemiology , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , UrologistsABSTRACT
ABSTRACT Objectives: to analyze the effects of nursing professionals' behavior in adverse event following immunization surveillance. Methods: a cross-sectional study of 384 participants who received vaccines. Information on vaccination history, administered vaccines and vaccination guidelines were analyzed. Descriptive and bivariate analyzes were performed using simple logistic regression (unadjusted Odds Ratio). Results: guidelines on events (PR=1.8; p=0.001) and conducts regarding their occurrence (PR=1.7; p=0.001) are activities that influence adverse event following immunization surveillance. More than half of participants did not receive guidance on the vaccines administered, the events and the conduct in case of an occurrence. Only 38.5% were instructed about the vaccines administered and 40.6% about adverse events. In the presence of an event, 29.9% reported that they sought services for notification. Conclusions: proper screening, providing guidance on vaccines and adverse events are essential preventive measures to strengthen adverse event following immunization surveillance.
RESUMEN Objetivos: analizar los efectos del comportamiento de los profesionales de enfermería en la vigilancia de eventos adversos posvacunación. Métodos: estudio transversal con 384 participantes que recibieron vacunas. Se analizó la información sobre el historial de vacunación, las vacunas administradas y las pautas de vacunación. Se realizaron análisis descriptivos y bivariados mediante regresión logística simple (Odds Ratio no ajustada). Resultados: las guías sobre eventos (RP=1,8; p=0,001) y las conductas en cuanto a su ocurrencia (RP=1,7; p=0,001) son actividades que influyen en la vigilancia de eventos adversos tras la vacunación. Más de la mitad de los participantes no recibieron orientación sobre las vacunas administradas, los eventos y la conducta en caso de ocurrencia. Solo el 38,5% recibió instrucciones sobre las vacunas administradas y el 40,6% sobre los eventos adversos. Ante la presencia del evento, el 29,9% informó que solicitó servicios de notificación. Conclusiones: realizar un cribado adecuado, orientar sobre las vacunas y los eventos adversos son medidas preventivas fundamentales para fortalecer la vigilancia de los eventos adversos posvacunación.
RESUMO Objetivos: analisar os efeitos das condutas dos profissionais de enfermagem na vigilância de eventos adversos pós-vacinação. Métodos: estudo transversal, com 384 participantes que receberam vacinas. Analisadas informações de antecedentes vacinais, vacinas administradas e orientações sobre vacinação. Realizadas análises descritivas e bivariada, por meio de regressão logística simples (Odds Ratio não ajustada). Resultados: as orientações sobre os eventos (RP=1.8; p=0,001) e as condutas frente a sua ocorrência (RP=1.7; p=0,001) são atividades que influenciam a vigilância dos eventos adversos pós-vacinação. Mais da metade dos participantes não recebeu orientações sobre as vacinas administradas, os eventos e as condutas em caso de ocorrência. Somente 38,5% foram orientados sobre as vacinas administradas e 40,6%, sobre os eventos adversos. Na presença do evento, 29,9% relataram que procuraram os serviços para notificação. Conclusões: realizar triagem adequada, orientar a respeito das vacinas e dos eventos adversos são medidas preventivas essenciais para fortalecer a vigilância de eventos adversos pós-vacinação.
