Association analysis of DNA methylation and the tissue/developmental expression of the FUT3 gene in Meishan pigs.

Porcine α-1,3-fucosyltransferase (FUT3), as a member of the fucosyltransferase family, plays an important role in the resistance of the piglet intestine to pathogenic microbial infection. To further investigate the tissue/developmental expression of FUT3 and its regulatory mechanism, we analyzed changes in the expression of FUT3 in the duodenal tissues of Meishan pigs at different ages and found that the expression of FUT3 showed a decreasing trend with increasing age. In addition, bisulfite sequencing identified nine methylated CpG sites in the FUT3 core promoter (-500 âˆ¼ -206) region. Therein, the methylation level at the mC-9 site located in FUT3 showed a significantly negative association with mRNA expression (P < 0.05). A further dual-luciferase assay demonstrated that methylation at the mC-9 site of the FUT3 promoter inhibited its transcriptional activity. Then, we confirmed the binding of Sp1 to the FUT3 promoter using RNA knockdown and a ChIP-qPCR assay. Our findings indicate that DNA methylation at the mC-9 site may inhibit the binding of the transcription factor Sp1, thus regulating the developmental expression of the FUT3 gene in the duodenum, providing some theoretical basis for the FUT3 gene as an important candidate marker of disease resistance in Meishan pigs.

Divergence in phenotyping and genotyping analysis of the Lewis histo-blood group system.

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the red blood cell (RBC) Lewis phenotypes by simple haemagglutination technique and molecular genotyping in healthy individuals. BACKGROUND: The expression of Lewis antigen on RBCs is dependent on the interaction of FUT3 and FUT2 genes. Complexity of the genetic control of Lewis antigen expression and the error-prone nature of Lewis phenotyping result in non-genuine RBC Lewis phenotypes, which could be misleading. MATERIALS AND METHODS: ABO blood group and RBC Lewis phenotypes were determined by conventional haemagglutination tube techniques. FUT2 and FUT3 genotypes were analysed by polymerase chain reaction and direct DNA sequencing. The RBC Lewis phenotypes were also inferred from the FUT2 and FUT3 genotyping results. RESULTS: The frequencies of RBC Lewis phenotypes typed by the conventional tube test were Le(a+b-) 19.63%, Le(a-b+) 49.32% and Le(a-b-) 31.05%, whereas the frequencies inferred from the FUT2 and FUT3 genotypes were Le(a+b-) 20.09%, Le(a-b+), 59.82%; Le(a-b-), 17.81%; and Le(a+b+), 5 (2.28%). The Le(a+b+) phenotype was not detected by the tube test, and a significant difference was observed in the frequencies of the determined Le(a-b-) and Le(a-b+) phenotypes. CONCLUSION: The phenotyping and genotyping of Lewis blood group system reveal a high rate of discordance in the frequencies of Lewis phenotypes among the healthy individuals.

Estimation of genetic variation in the Secretor and Lewis genes in Iranian hospitalized children.

BACKGROUND: The Secretor (FUT2) and lewis gene (FUT3) are in charge of the construction of histo-blood group antigens, which act as a receptor for some Pathogenes. This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of five significant single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in Iranian children. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, 102 blood samples collected from hospitalized children. The FUT2 gene region was amplified and sequenced to explore rs1047781 and rs601338, and the FUT3 gene region was amplified to explore rs28362459, rs812936, rs778986 SNPs. RESULTS: In FUT2 gene, Se358,428 that produces Se phenotype with 63% (0.53 - 0.72) prevalence, was the most common genotype. For FUT3 gene Le59,202,314 with 80% prevalence was most common genotype (0.71 - 0.87). CONCLUSION: This study genotyped Secretor and Lewis genes and designated SNPs' distinct distribution in Iran, and clarified at-risk groups for certain diseases.

FUT3 and FUT2 genotyping and glycoconjugate profile Lewisb as a protective factor to Toxoplasma gondii infection.

The interaction between the ABO, FUT2 and FUT3 genes results in the synthesis of different glycoconjugates profiles expressed in gastrointestinal tract. Moreover, the protozoan Toxoplasma gondii, which causes toxoplasmosis, utilizes this organ as an infection route. We analyzed the frequencies of the different glycoconjugate profiles which were determined by phenotyping ABO and genotyping the status secretor (FUT2; substitution G428A) and Lewis (FUT3; substitution T202C and C314T) histo-blood systems, assessed by PCR-RFLP and PCR-SSP, respectively. A total of 244 pregnant women (G1: Seropositive; G2: Seronegative) for IgG T. gondii antibodies were enrolled. IgG anti-T. gondii antibodies were determined by ELISA. G1 was composed of 158 (64.8%) sample and G2 by 86 (36.2%). The glycoconjugate profile was accessed in 151 seropositive and 85 seronegative samples by the combination of ABO and Lewis phenotyping as well as FUT2 and FUT3 genotyping. In G1, 36 (22.8%) presented the glycoconjugate profile ALeb, 5 (3.3%) A, 13 (8.6) BLeb, 1 (0.6%) B, 41 (27.1%) Leb, 13(8.6%) H, 38(25.2%) Lea and 4 (2.6%) Lec. G2 was composed of 13 (15.3%) of ALeb, 15 (17.6%) BLeb, 1 (1.2%) B, 42 (49,4%) Leb and 14 (16.5) Lea. H and Lec glycoconjugate profiles were not found in G2. The frequencies of the glycoconjugates profiles Leb (p = 0.001) and H (p = 0.005) were significantly different compared between G1 and G2. The glycoconjugate profile H inferred from the ABO phenotyping and FUT3 and FUT2 genotyping is associated with infection by T. gondii in pregnant women and the Leb profile appears to protect the infection by this parasite.

Lewis histo-blood group system phenotyping and genotyping reveal divergence in the association of Le(a-b-) phenotype and type 1 diabetes.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The red blood cell Le(a-b-) phenotype was proposed as risk factor for type 1 diabetes, but contradictory results were published elsewhere. This study re-examined the potential association between Lewis histo-blood group system and type 1 diabetes. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients and controls of both sexes, Caucasians and non-Caucasians, matched by sex, geographical origin and ethnicity were evaluated. The red blood cell Lewis phenotypes were identified by gel column agglutination and also inferred from the FUT2 and FUT3 genotyping. RESULTS: The Le(a-b-) phenotype was prevalent in patients with type 1 diabetes, and the Le(a-b+) phenotype was prevalent in controls when both were determined by gel columns agglutination. No differences were observed in the frequencies of the Le(a-b-) phenotype inferred from the FUT2 and FUT3 genotyping between patients and controls. CONCLUSIONS: The Lewis red blood cell phenotyping and genotyping reveal divergence in the association of Le(a-b-) phenotype and type 1 diabetes.

Evaluation of the Genotypes of the Lewis Blood Group in a Korean Population Using Direct Sequencing

BACKGROUND: The FUT2 and FUT3 genes determine the Lewis phenotype of red blood cells (RBCs). Recently, the Lewis genes, the secretor genes, and several mutations that cause Lewis negative and nonsecretor phenotypes have been identified. The purpose of this study was to analyze the gene frequency of FUT2 and FUT3 in a Korean population by comparing the use of the direct sequencing method to the use of the polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) method for mutation detection in the FUT2 and FUT3 genes. METHODS: RBCs and peripheral blood leukocytes were obtained from 225 apparently healthy volunteers to determine the phenotype and genotype of the FUT2 and FUT3 genes. Lewis phenotypes were determined on K3EDTA-stablized fresh blood samples using the column agglutination method. Lewis blood group genotyping was performed by use of the direct sequencing method. For the detection of T59G, C357T, and A385T mutations, the PCR-RFLP method was performed. RESULTS: The frequencies of the Lewis blood group phenotype were 12.4% for Le(a+b-), 70.7% for Le(a-b+), 11.1% for Le(a-b-) and 5.8% for Le(a+b+), respectively. Direct Sequencing of the FUT2 gene identified 92.2% C357T, 56.9% A385T, 0.4% G244A mutations and 1.8% del396. Direct Sequencing of the FUT3 gene identified 46.9% T59G, 30.4% G508A, 1.1% T202C, 1.1% C314T, 0.7% A1029G, 3.0% T1067A and 13.3% G1242A mutations. The PCR-RFLP method results were discordant in nine cases (1 case for C357T, 4 cases for A385T and 2 cases for T59G) as compared to the direct sequencing method results. CONCLUSION: We have determined the frequencies of FUT2 and FUT3 gene mutations in a Korean population. The use of the direct sequencing method was more accurate than the use of the PCR-RFLP method for the determination of the genotype of the FUT2 and FUT3 genes.

Evaluation of the RBC Lewis Blood Group Phenotypes and Genotypes of the FUT3 and FUT2 Gene / 대한진단검사의학회지

BACKGROUND: The Lewis and secretor gene determine the Lewis phenoytpe. Conventional Lewis blood grouping is difficult because of the presence of nongenuine Lewis negative individuals. Recently, the Lewis gene (FUT3), the secretor gene (FUT2), and several mutations that cause the Lewis negative and the nonsecretor phenotypes were identified. The purpose of this study was to compare Lewis phenotypes determined by commercially available three pairs of monoclonal antibodies with the Lewis and secretor genotypes. METHODS: RBCs for phenotyping and peripheral blood leukocytes for genotyping of FUT3 and FUT2 gene were obtained from 184 apparently healthy volunteers. Lewis phenotypes were determined on K3EDTA-stablized fresh blood samples using three pairs of commercially available monoclonal antibodies, one of which was the column agglutination method and the others were the tube agglutination methods. Lewis blood group genotyping was performed by the polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) method to detect T59G, G428A, C357T, and A385T mutations. RESULTS: The frequencies of the Lewis blood group phenotype were Le(a+b-) 15.0%, Le(a-b+) 65.8%, Le(a-b-) 14.8%, and Le(a+b+) 4.3%, respectively. The Lewis blood group phenotypes determined by three pairs of monoclonal antibodies were 93.5%, 93.5% and 89.1% in accordance with the genotypes. The frequencies of Le, le, Se and se alleles were 64.4%, 35.6%, 48.6%, and 51.4% and we have newly detected 4 cases with only one A385T mutation. All of the Le(a+b+) phenotype cases have both C357T, and A385T homozygotic mutations. CONCLUSIONS: The PCR method may be effectively used for the genotyping of the FUT3 and FUT2 genes and offers an attractive alternative to Lewis phenotyping using hemagglutination method.