Prognostic factors in childhood vitiligo.

BACKGROUND: Vitiligo is a multifactorial disease characterized by the progressive loss of melanocytes. The worldwide prevalence ranges from 0.5% to 2%, and in children from 0% to 2.16%. The objective of this study was to determine the variables associated with progression of vitiligo. METHODS: A retrospective cohort was carried out where a random sample of records of pediatric patients with vitiligo from January 2016 to December 2020 was analyzed. The variables were studied: age at onset, sex, hereditary family history, personal history of thyroid diseases, time of evolution, classification, Köebner phenomena, mucosal vitiligo, halo nevus, premature graying and the presence of other dermatoses. The final state was classified as progression, stability, partial remission and complete remission. RESULTS: 574 children with vitiligo; 290 (50.5%) women, 284 (49.5%) men. Non-segmental vitiligo in 324 (56.4%), segmental vitiligo in 250 (43.6%). Mean age of onset 8.7 years (SD: 4.54). Median evolution time 6 months (25th percentile of 3 months and 75th percentile of 24 months). Family history 27 (4.70%). Thyroid disease 7 (1.21%). Evolution remained stable in 44 (7.7%), 68 (11.8%) had progression, 32 (5.6%) complete remission, 222 (38.7%) partial remission and 208 (36.2%) one consultation. Non-segmental vitiligo was obtained p < 0.028, younger age of onset p < 0.000, and none skin comorbidities p < 0.009. CONCLUSIONS: The variables that were associated with a more progression were non-segmental vitiligo, early ages at the onset of the disease, and not presenting with other skin diseases.

INTRODUCCIÓN: El vitiligo es una enfermedad multifactorial caracterizada por la pérdida de melanocitos. La prevalencia mundial oscila entre el 0.5% y el 2%, y en niños entre el 0% y el 2.16%. El objetivo de este estudio fue determinar las características clínicas asociadas a la progresión del vitiligo. MÉTODOS: En una cohorte retrospectiva se analizó una muestra aleatoria de expedientes de pacientes con vitiligo de 0-18 años de edad, de enero de 2016 a diciembre de 2020. Se estudiaron la edad de inicio, el sexo, los antecedentes heredofamiliares, el antecedente personal de enfermedades tiroideas, el tiempo de evolución, la clasificación, el fenómeno de Köebner, el vitiligo en mucosas, el halo nevo, el encanecimiento prematuro y la relación con otras dermatosis. El estado final se clasificó en progresión, estabilidad, remisión parcial y remisión completa. RESULTADOS: 574 niños con vitiligo; 290 (50.5%) mujeres y 284 (49.5%) varones. Vitiligo no segmentario en 324 (56.4%), vitiligo segmentario en 250 (43.6%). Edad promedio de aparición 8.7 años (DE: 4.54). Mediana de tiempo de evolución 6 meses (percentil 25 de 3 meses y percentil 75 de 24 meses). Se encontraron antecedentes familiares en 27 (4.70%). Enfermedad tiroidea en 7 (1.21%). En la evolución permanecieron estables 44 (7.7%), progresaron 68 (11.8%), remisión completa 32 (5.6%), remisión parcial 222 (38.7%) y una consulta 208 (36.2%). Se obtuvo p < 0.028 en vitiligo no segmentario, p < 0.000 en menor edad de aparición y p < 0.009 en comorbilidad cutánea. CONCLUSIONES: Las variables que se asociaron a progresión fueron vitiligo no segmentario, edad temprana de inicio y no cursar con otras enfermedades cutáneas.

Prognostic value of anti-IFI16 autoantibodies in pulmonary arterial hypertension and mortality in patients with systemic sclerosis / Valor pronóstico de los autoanticuerpos anti-IFI16 en la hipertensión arterial pulmonar y en la mortalidad en los pacientes con esclerodermia sistémica

Objectives: To determine the diagnostic value of anti-interferon gamma inducible protein 16 (IFI16) autoantibodies in systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients negative for all tested SSc-specific autoantibodies (SSc-seronegative patients) and to evaluate the clinical significance of these autoantibodies, whether isolated or in the presence of anti-centromere autoantibodies (ACA). Methods: Overall, 58 SSc-seronegative and 66 ACA-positive patients were included in the study. All patients were tested for anti-IFI16 autoantibodies by an in-house direct ELISA. Associations between clinical parameters and anti-IFI16 autoantibodies were analysed. Results: Overall, 17.2% of SSc-seronegative and 39.4% of ACA-positive patients were positive for anti-IFI16 autoantibodies. Anti-IFI16 autoantibodies were found only in patients within the limited cutaneous SSc (lcSSc) subset. A positive association between anti-IFI16 positivity and isolated pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) was found (odds ratio [OR]=5.07; p=0.014) even after adjusting for ACA status (OR=4.99; p=0.019). Anti-IFI16-positive patients were found to have poorer overall survival than negative patients (p=0.032). Cumulative survival rates at 10, 20 and 30 years were 96.9%, 92.5% and 68.7% for anti-IFI16-positive patients vs. 98.8%, 97.0% and 90.3% for anti-IFI16-negative-patients, respectively. Anti-IFI16-positive patients also had worse overall survival than anti-IFI16-negative patients after adjusting for ACA status in the multivariate Cox analysis (hazard ratio [HR]=3.21; p=0.043). Conclusion: Anti-IFI16 autoantibodies were associated with isolated PAH and poorer overall survival. Anti-IFI16 autoantibodies could be used as a supplementary marker of lcSSc in SSc-seronegative patients and for identifying ACA-positive patients with worse clinical outcome. (AU)

Objetivos: Determinar el valor diagnóstico de los autoanticuerpos anti-interferon gamma inducible protein 16 (IFI16) en los pacientes con esclerodermia sistémica (SSc) negativos para todos los autoanticuerpos específicos de SSc (pacientes SSc seronegativos) y evaluar el significado clínico de estos autoanticuerpos, aislados o en combinación con autoanticuerpos anticentrómero (ACA). Métodos: Se incluyeron 58 pacientes SSc seronegativos y 66 pacientes ACA positivos. Todos los pacientes se testaron para los autoanticuerpos anti-IFI16 mediante un ELISA directo «in-house». Las asociaciones entre parámetros clínicos y los autoanticuerpos anti-IFI16 fueron analizadas. Resultados: En total, el 17,2% de los pacientes SSc seronegativos y el 39,4% de los pacientes ACA positivos fueron positivos para anti-IFI16. Los autoanticuerpos anti-IFI16 se detectaron solamente en los pacientes con la forma limitada cutánea de SSc (lcSSc). Se encontró una asociación entre la positividad de anti-IFI16 y la hipertensión arterial pulmonar (HAP) aislada (odds ratio [OR]: 5,07; p=0,014), incluso cuando se ajustó el análisis a la presencia o ausencia de ACA (OR: 4,99; p=0,019). Los pacientes anti-IFI16 positivos mostraron una peor supervivencia general que los pacientes negativos (p=0,032). Las ratios de supervivencia acumulada a 10, 20 y 30 años fueron respectivamente del 96,9, 92,5 y 68,7% para los pacientes anti-IFI16 positivos frente al 98,8, 97,0 y 90,3% para los anti-IFI16 negativos. Los pacientes anti-IFI16 positivos también tenían una supervivencia general menor que los pacientes anti-IFI16 negativos tras ajustar para la presencia o ausencia de ACA mediante análisis multivariado de Cox (hazard ratio [HR]: 3,21; p=0,043)... (AU)

Identification of prognostic factors for survival in patients with metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma in a Mexican population.

INTRODUCTION AND AIMS: Gastric adenocarcinoma is among the high-ranking tumors, with respect to frequency and mortality, worldwide. The inflammatory process and immune system activity are associated with oncologic control. Our aim was to identify whether the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and other variables are prognostic factors for survival in patients with metastatic gastric cancer in a Mexican population. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients diagnosed with metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma, hospitalized within the time frame of December 2011 to 2021, were analyzed. The NLR, PLR, and albumin and hemoglobin levels obtained from blood samples were calculated. Functional status (ECOG and Karnofsky), sex, histology, and the presence of signet ring cells were also considered possible prognostic factors. Each factor's prognostic value for overall survival was determined through univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: The study included 956 patients diagnosed with metastatic gastric cancer, of whom 494 (51.7%) were men and 462 (48.3%) were women. The main histologic finding was diffuse adenocarcinoma (n = 619, 64.7%), followed by intestinal adenocarcinoma (n = 293, 30.6%), and the presence of signet ring cells was found in 659 (68.9%) patients. Diagnostic laparoscopy was performed on 238 patients (24.9%) to confirm peritoneal carcinomatosis. The multivariate analysis showed that an NLR above 3.2 (HR 1.51, 95% CI 1.27-1.8; p < 0.001), albumin below 3.5 g/dl (HR 1.25, CI 1.06-1.47; p = 0.006), and an ECOG performance status of 2 or higher (HR 1.39, CI 1.10-1.76; p = 0.005) were independent factors that predicted a lower survival rate, whereas a Karnofsky score above 70% (HR 0.69, CI 0.53-0.91; p = 0.008) was associated with a better survival rate. Lastly, the PLR was not statistically significant in the multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The NLR, nutritional status assessed through albumin measurement, and functional status can act as independent prognostic survival factors in hospitalized Mexican patients diagnosed with metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma and be taken into account during therapeutic decision-making.

Prognostic value of anti-IFI16 autoantibodies in pulmonary arterial hypertension and mortality in patients with systemic sclerosis.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the diagnostic value of anti-interferon gamma inducible protein 16 (IFI16) autoantibodies in systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients negative for all tested SSc-specific autoantibodies (SSc-seronegative patients) and to evaluate the clinical significance of these autoantibodies, whether isolated or in the presence of anti-centromere autoantibodies (ACA). METHODS: Overall, 58 SSc-seronegative and 66 ACA-positive patients were included in the study. All patients were tested for anti-IFI16 autoantibodies by an in-house direct ELISA. Associations between clinical parameters and anti-IFI16 autoantibodies were analysed. RESULTS: Overall, 17.2% of SSc-seronegative and 39.4% of ACA-positive patients were positive for anti-IFI16 autoantibodies. Anti-IFI16 autoantibodies were found only in patients within the limited cutaneous SSc (lcSSc) subset. A positive association between anti-IFI16 positivity and isolated pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) was found (odds ratio [OR]=5.07; p=0.014) even after adjusting for ACA status (OR=4.99; p=0.019). Anti-IFI16-positive patients were found to have poorer overall survival than negative patients (p=0.032). Cumulative survival rates at 10, 20 and 30 years were 96.9%, 92.5% and 68.7% for anti-IFI16-positive patients vs. 98.8%, 97.0% and 90.3% for anti-IFI16-negative-patients, respectively. Anti-IFI16-positive patients also had worse overall survival than anti-IFI16-negative patients after adjusting for ACA status in the multivariate Cox analysis (hazard ratio [HR]=3.21; p=0.043). CONCLUSION: Anti-IFI16 autoantibodies were associated with isolated PAH and poorer overall survival. Anti-IFI16 autoantibodies could be used as a supplementary marker of lcSSc in SSc-seronegative patients and for identifying ACA-positive patients with worse clinical outcome.

Have we improved postoperative and long-term outcomes of liver surgery for colorectal cancer metastasis? Analysis of 1736 hepatectomies performed over 3 decades in a single center.

INTRODUCTION: Surgery is the only potentially curative treatment for colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLM) and its indication and results have varied in the last 30 years. METHODS: All patients operated on for CRLM in our centre from 1990 to 2021 were prospectively collected, establishing 3 subgroups based on the year of the first surgery: group A 1990-1999, group B 2000-2010, group C 2011-2021. Clinical characteristics and the results of survival, recurrence and prognostic factors were compared. RESULTS: 1736 hepatectomies were included (Group A n = 208; Group B n = 770; Group C n = 758). Patients in group C had better survival at 5 and 10 years (A 40.5%/28.2%; B 45.9%/32.2%; C 51.6%/33.1%, p = 0.013), although there were no differences between groups in overall recurrence at 5 and 10 years (A 73%/75.7%; B 67.6%/69.2%, and C 63.9%/66%, p = 0.524), nor in liver recurrence (A 46.4%/48.2%; B 45.8%/48.2%; and C 44.4%/48.4%, p = 0.899). An improvement was observed in median survival after recurrence, being 19 months, 23 months, and 31 months (groups A, B and C respectively). Prognostic factors of long-term survival changed over the 3 study periods. The only ones that remained relevant in the last decade were the presence of >4 liver metastasis, extrahepatic disease at the time of hepatectomy, and intraoperative blood transfusion. CONCLUSIONS: Survival after surgery for CRLM has improved significantly, although this cannot be explained by a reduction in overall and hepatic recurrence, but rather by an improvement in post-recurrence survival. Involvement of the resection margin has lost prognostic value in the last decade.

Factores pronósticos y la influencia en la supervivencia de operados de cáncer de pulmón en el Hospital Universitario General Calixto García / Prognostic Factors and their Influence of Patients Operated on for Lung Cancer at Hospital Universitario General Calixto García

Introducción: El cáncer de pulmón ocupa el primer lugar entre las causas de mortalidad por cáncer a nivel mundial y solamente el 15,6 por ciento de los que padecen esta enfermedad sobreviven los 5 años. Objetivo: Evaluar la influencia de los factores pronósticos en la supervivencia de operados por cáncer de pulmón. Métodos: Estudio observacional descriptivo, tipo serie de casos de 107 enfermos operados en el Hospital Universitario General Calixto García en el período 2015-2020. Se utilizaron las variables tipo histológico, estadio clínico, estado físico e intervención quirúrgica. Resultados: Predominó el sexo masculino en edades entre 60-69 años, con antecedentes de hipertensión arterial y tabaquismo. Los síntomas que predominaron fueron la disnea, la tos y el dolor torácico. Las etapas clínicas más frecuentes fueron en orden: IIIA, IIB, IIA y las variantes histopatológicas adenocarcinoma y epidermoide. La técnica quirúrgica más empleada fue la lobectomía. Conclusiones: Los factores pronósticos de mayor significación estadística son la comorbilidad, la presencia de síntomas y el diagnóstico tardío. Los factores pronósticos relacionados con el tumor y el tratamiento quirúrgico con adyuvancia tienen una alta repercusión en la supervivencia(AU)

Introduction: Lung cancer ranks first among the causes of cancer mortality worldwide and only 15.6 percent of those with this disease survive the 5 years. Objective: To assess the influence of prognostic factors on the survival of patients operated on for lung cancer. Methods: A descriptive observational study of case series was carried out with 107 patients operated on at Hospital Universitario General Calixto García in the period 2015-2020. The variables histological type, clinical stage, physical condition and surgical intervention were used. Results: There was a predominance of the male sex, aged 60-69 years, with a history of arterial hypertension and smoking. The predominant symptoms were dyspnea, cough and chest pain. The most frequent clinical stages were IIIA, IIB, IIA, in that order; and the predominant histopathological variants were adenocarcinoma and epidermoid. The most commonly used surgical technique was lobectomy. Conclusions: The prognostic factors of greatest statistical significance are comorbidity, presence of symptoms and late diagnosis. Prognostic factors related to the tumor or the adjuvant surgical treatment have a high impact on survival(AU)

Survival Analysis and Prognostic Factors in a Case Series of 148 Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphomas. / Análisis de supervivencia y factores pronósticos en una serie de 148 casos de linfomas cutáneos de células T.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Cutaneous T-cell lymphomas (CTCL) such as mycosis fungoides (MF) and Sézary syndrome (SS) are rare lymphomas with varying prognoses. The aim of the study was to describe the survival of a cohort of patients with MF/SS and evaluate the prognostic factors impacting disease survival. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All cases of MF/SS diagnosed from 2008 through 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The demographic variables, histological parameters, and analytical data were analyzed too. Progression-free survival (PFS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 148 cases were included. A total of 121 (82%) and 27 cases were diagnosed with MF, and SS, respectively. A total of 37 patients (25%) experienced progression at some point disease progression. The median PFS and median DSS were 127 and 135 months, respectively. Age >60 years, diagnosis of SS, the presence of large cell transformation (LCT) at diagnosis, folliculotropism in early stages, high Ki-67 expression, the presence of the clonal T-cell receptor (TCR) in blood, elevated LDH and B2M levels, and advanced stages (IIB, IVA, T3, T4, N3/Nx) were associated with worse prognosis across the entire cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Stage IVA and the presence of LCT at diagnosis stood out as independent factors of unfavorable prognosis. LCT was the variable that most significantly impacted the patients' survival and was closely associated with tumor skin involvement and stage IIB.

Influence of anesthetic blockades on recurrence and spread of breast cancer / Influencia de los bloqueos anestésicos en la recidiva y diseminación del cáncer de mama

Introduction: Historically, pathological and laboratory factors are considered in the prognosis of breast cancer. Tumor resection surgery constitutes the main treatment, but paradoxically, the surgical manipulation and perioperative immunosuppression may predispose to cancer dissemination. Locoregional anesthetic techniques would avoid this immunosuppression, thus improving the oncologic outcomes of surgery. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic influence of locoregional anesthesia on breast cancer dissemination and recurrence after surgery. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed on 165 centrolobulillar breast cancer patients, scheduled for non-reconstructive breast oncologic surgery between 2012 and 2015. These patients were treated with conservative surgery under general anesthesia (control group, n = 81) or combined anesthesia with a locoregional block (n = 84). Data were collected on age, tumor type (size, stage, lymph node infiltration), immunohistochemical factors (hormone receptors), procedure (duration, technique), anesthesia (general anesthesia or associated with regional blockade), complications, survival, and recurrence. Results: Statistical analysis demonstrated no significative differences in age, weight, sex, ASA status, and surgical technique and duration. Tumor recurrence was recorded in 6 patients (4 in the general group and 2 in the locoregional group) 1 year after surgery, and 6 (4 in the general group and 2 in the locoregional group) 5 years after. No significant differences between groups in morbi-mortality were found. Conclusions: Following the interfascial analgesic technique, a lower rate of tumor recurrence was observed, but no significant differences. (AU)

Introducción: Históricamente, se han considerado los factores patológicos y de laboratorio para pronosticar el cáncer de mama. La cirugía de resección tumoral constituye el tratamiento principal pero, paradójicamente, la manipulación quirúrgica y la inmunosupresión perioperatoria pueden predisponer a la diseminación del cáncer. Las técnicas anestésicas locorregionales evitarían esta inmunosupresión, mejorando por tanto los resultados oncológicos de la cirugía. El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar la influencia pronóstica de la anestesia locorregional en la diseminación y recidiva del cáncer de mama tras la cirugía. Métodos: Se realizó un estudio de cohorte retrospectivo de 165 pacientes de cáncer de mama centrolobulillar, programadas para cirugía oncológica de mama no reconstructiva entre 2012 y 2015. Dichas pacientes fueron tratadas con cirugía conservadora bajo anestesia general (grupo control, n = 81) o anestesia combinada con bloqueo locorregional (n = 84). Se recopilaron datos sobre edad, tipo de tumor (tamaño, estado, infiltración ganglionar), factores inmunohistoquímicos (receptores hormonales), procedimiento (duración, técnica), anestesia (anestesia general o anestesia asociada a bloqueo regional), complicaciones, supervivencia y recidiva. Resultados: El análisis estadístico no mostró diferencias significativas en cuando a edad, peso, sexo, estatus ASA, técnica quirúrgica y duración. Se registró la recidiva tumoral en 6 pacientes (4 en el grupo general y 2 en el grupo locorregional) transcurrido un año de la cirugía, y 6 pacientes (4 en el grupo general y 2 en el grupo locorregional) transcurridos cinco años. No se encontraron diferencias significativas entre los grupos en términos de morbi-mortalidad. Conclusiones: Tras la técnica analgésica interfascial, se observó una tasa de recidiva tumoral inferior, aunque sin diferencias significativas. (AU)

Three-Year Survival in a Cohort of Women with Breast Cancer from an Insurance Company in Cali, 2017-2020 / SUPERVIVENCIA A TRES AÑOS EN UNA COHORTE DE MUJERES CON CÁNCER DE MAMA DE UNA ASEGURADORA EN CALI 2017-2020

INTRODUCTION: Breast cancer, in particular, is a significant concern in public health due to its high mortality rate. This research focuses on understanding the factors related to the 3-year survival of women with breast cancer in Cali, contributing to addressing this health challenge. OBJECTIVE: To determine the socio-demographic, clinical, and healthcare-related factors associated with the 3-year survival of women with breast cancer affiliated with an insurance provider in Cali from 2017 to 2020. This study aims to generate scientific evidence for decision-making within the insurance provider and the region. METHODOLOGY: A study was conducted in women with breast cancer in Cali to identify factors linked to 3-year survival. Data from a cohort of women with breast cancer affiliated with an insurance provider were analyzed, applying inclusion and exclusion criteria. Socio-demographic, clinical, and healthcare-related factors were assessed. Data were collected from secondary sources and analyzed to determine variables associated with survival. Ethical and confidentiality considerations were adhered to throughout the process. RESULTS: The most significant finding of our study, based on a three-year follow-up of 140 women with breast cancer, is the alarming mortality rate of 21.4%. We emphasize the importance of diagnosing the disease at its early stages, which can make a difference in the survival and prognosis of patients. CONCLUSION: The study highlights the high vulnerability of the cohort of women with breast cancer affiliated with the insurance provider. Although a longer survival time was observed in certain groups, the mortality rate remains significant.

INTRODUCCIÓN: El cáncer de mama, en particular, es una preocupación significativa en la salud pública debido a su alta mortalidad. Esta investigación se centra en comprender los factores relacionados con la supervivencia a 3 años de mujeres con cáncer de mama en Cali, contribuyendo a abordar este desafío de salud. OBJETIVO: determinar los factores socio demográficos, clínicos y de atención en salud asociados a la supervivencia a 3 años de mujeres con cáncer de mama afiliadas a una aseguradora en Cali 2017-2020, generando evidencia científica para la toma de decisiones tanto en la aseguradora como en la región. METODOLOGIA: Se realizó un estudio en mujeres con cáncer de mama en Cali para identificar factores vinculados a la supervivencia a 3 años. Se analizaron datos de una cohorte de mujeres con cáncer de mama afiliadas a una aseguradora, aplicando criterios de inclusión y exclusión. Se evaluaron factores sociodemográficos, clínicos y de atención en salud. Los datos se recopilaron de fuentes secundarias y se analizaron para determinar las variables relacionadas con la supervivencia. Se cumplieron consideraciones éticas y de confidencialidad en el proceso. RESULTADOS: El hallazgo más significativo de nuestro estudio, basado en un seguimiento de tres años a 140 mujeres con cáncer de mama, es la alarmante tasa de mortalidad del 21.4%. Destacamos la importancia de diagnosticar la enfermedad en sus estadios iniciales, lo que puede marcar la diferencia en la supervivencia y el pronóstico de las pacientes. CONCLUSION: Estudio destaca la alta vulnerabilidad de la cohorte de mujeres con cáncer de mama afiliadas a la EAPB. Aunque se observó un mayor tiempo de supervivencia en ciertos grupos, la tasa de mortalidad sigue siendo significativa.

Revisión de revisiones sistemáticas de factores pronóstico para infección protésica / Overview of systematic reviews of risk factors for prosthetic joint infection

Introducción: La infección protésica es una de las complicaciones más graves en cirugía ortopédica, por lo que es importante detectar factores relacionados con su aparición. Las revisiones sistemáticas (RS) pronósticas detectan y evalúan factores relacionados con enfermedades, lo que permite una mejor predicción de los riesgos y la implementación de medidas preventivas. Aunque estas RS pronósticas son cada vez más frecuentes, su campo metodológico presenta algunas lagunas de conocimiento. Objetivo: Realizar una revisión de RS de factores pronósticos para infección protésica y describir la evidencia sintetizada. Secundariamente, evaluar el riesgo de sesgo y la calidad metodológica. Material y métodos: Búsqueda bibliográfica en 4bases de datos (en mayo de 2021) para identificar RS pronósticas que evaluaran factores pronósticos para infección protésica. Evaluamos el riesgo de sesgo mediante ROBIS y la calidad metodológica con la herramienta modificada AMSTAR-2. Se realizó un estudio de solapamiento entre RS. Resultados: Incluimos 23 RS que valoraban 15 factores asociados con la infección protésica; de ellos, 13 mostraron asociación significativa. Los más estudiados fueron obesidad, corticoides intraarticulares, tabaquismo y glucemia elevada. El solapamiento entre RS fue elevado para obesidad y muy alto para corticoides intraarticulares, tabaquismo y glucemia elevada. El riesgo de sesgo fue considerado bajo en 8 RS (34,7%), pero la herramienta de evaluación metodológica demostró una baja calidad en general. Conclusiones: La identificación de factores procedimentales modificables ofrecen mejores resultados a los pacientes. Sin embargo, muchas RS son redundantes. La evidencia en factores pronósticos en cirugía ortopédica es débil debido al alto riesgo de sesgo y a la calidad metodológica limitada.(AU)

Background: Prosthetic joint infection is one of the most serious complications in orthopedics. Prognostic systematic reviews (SR) detecting and assessing factors related to prosthetic joint infection, allow better prediction of risk and implementation of preventive measures. Although prognostic SR are increasingly frequent, their methodological field presents some knowledge gaps. Purpose: To carry out an overview of SR assessing risk factors for prosthetic joint infection, describing and synthesizing their evidence. Secondarily, to assess the risk of bias and methodological quality. Material and methods: We conducted a bibliographic search in 4databases (May 2021) to identify prognostic SR evaluating any risk factor for prosthetic joint infection. We evaluated risk of bias with the ROBIS tool, and methodological quality with a modified AMSTAR-2 tool. We computed the overlap degree study between included SR. Results: Twenty-three SR were included, studying 15 factors for prosthetic joint infection, of which, 13 had significant association. The most frequently studied risk factors were obesity, intra-articular corticosteroids, smoking and uncontrolled diabetes. Overlapping between SR was high for obesity and very high for intra-articular corticoid injection, smoking and uncontrolled diabetes. Risk of bias was considered low in 8SRs (34.7%). The modified AMSTAR-2 tool showed important methodological gaps. Conclusions: Identification of procedural-modifiable factors, such as intra-articular corticoids use, can give patients better results. Overlapping between SR was very high, meaning that some SR are redundant. The evidence on risk factors for prosthetic joint infection is weak due to high risk of bias and limited methodological quality.(AU)

[Translated article] Overview of systematic reviews of risk factors for prosthetic joint infection / Revisión de revisiones sistemáticas de factores pronóstico para infección protésica

Introducción: La infección protésica es una de las complicaciones más graves en cirugía ortopédica, por lo que es importante detectar factores relacionados con su aparición. Las revisiones sistemáticas (RS) pronósticas detectan y evalúan factores relacionados con enfermedades, lo que permite una mejor predicción de los riesgos y la implementación de medidas preventivas. Aunque estas RS pronósticas son cada vez más frecuentes, su campo metodológico presenta algunas lagunas de conocimiento. Objetivo: Realizar una revisión de RS de factores pronósticos para infección protésica y describir la evidencia sintetizada. Secundariamente, evaluar el riesgo de sesgo y la calidad metodológica. Material y métodos: Búsqueda bibliográfica en 4bases de datos (en mayo de 2021) para identificar RS pronósticas que evaluaran factores pronósticos para infección protésica. Evaluamos el riesgo de sesgo mediante ROBIS y la calidad metodológica con la herramienta modificada AMSTAR-2. Se realizó un estudio de solapamiento entre RS. Resultados: Incluimos 23 RS que valoraban 15 factores asociados con la infección protésica; de ellos, 13 mostraron asociación significativa. Los más estudiados fueron obesidad, corticoides intraarticulares, tabaquismo y glucemia elevada. El solapamiento entre RS fue elevado para obesidad y muy alto para corticoides intraarticulares, tabaquismo y glucemia elevada. El riesgo de sesgo fue considerado bajo en 8 RS (34,7%), pero la herramienta de evaluación metodológica demostró una baja calidad en general. Conclusiones: La identificación de factores procedimentales modificables ofrecen mejores resultados a los pacientes. Sin embargo, muchas RS son redundantes. La evidencia en factores pronósticos en cirugía ortopédica es débil debido al alto riesgo de sesgo y a la calidad metodológica limitada.(AU)

Background: Prosthetic joint infection is one of the most serious complications in orthopedics. Prognostic systematic reviews (SR) detecting and assessing factors related to prosthetic joint infection, allow better prediction of risk and implementation of preventive measures. Although prognostic SR are increasingly frequent, their methodological field presents some knowledge gaps. Purpose: To carry out an overview of SR assessing risk factors for prosthetic joint infection, describing and synthesizing their evidence. Secondarily, to assess the risk of bias and methodological quality. Material and methods: We conducted a bibliographic search in 4databases (May 2021) to identify prognostic SR evaluating any risk factor for prosthetic joint infection. We evaluated risk of bias with the ROBIS tool, and methodological quality with a modified AMSTAR-2 tool. We computed the overlap degree study between included SR. Results: Twenty-three SR were included, studying 15 factors for prosthetic joint infection, of which, 13 had significant association. The most frequently studied risk factors were obesity, intra-articular corticosteroids, smoking and uncontrolled diabetes. Overlapping between SR was high for obesity and very high for intra-articular corticoid injection, smoking and uncontrolled diabetes. Risk of bias was considered low in 8SRs (34.7%). The modified AMSTAR-2 tool showed important methodological gaps. Conclusions: Identification of procedural-modifiable factors, such as intra-articular corticoids use, can give patients better results. Overlapping between SR was very high, meaning that some SR are redundant. The evidence on risk factors for prosthetic joint infection is weak due to high risk of bias and limited methodological quality.(AU)

[Translated article] Overview of systematic reviews of risk factors for prosthetic joint infection.

BACKGROUND: Prosthetic joint infection is one of the most serious complications in orthopedics. Prognostic systematic reviews (SRs) detecting and assessing factors related to prosthetic joint infection, allow better prediction of risk and implementation of preventive measures. Although prognostic SRs are increasingly frequent, their methodological field presents some knowledge gaps. PURPOSE: To carry out an overview of SR assessing risk factors for prosthetic joint infection, describing and synthesizing their evidence. Secondarily, to assess the risk of bias and methodological quality. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a bibliographic search in 4 databases (May 2021) to identify prognostic SR evaluating any risk factor for prosthetic joint infection. We evaluated risk of bias with the ROBIS tool, and methodological quality with a modified AMSTAR-2 tool. We computed the overlap degree study between included SR. RESULTS: Twenty-three SRs were included, studying 15 factors for prosthetic joint infection, of which, 13 had significant association. The most frequently studied risk factors were obesity, intra-articular corticosteroids, smoking and uncontrolled diabetes. Overlapping between SR was high for obesity and very high for intra-articular corticoid injection, smoking and uncontrolled diabetes. Risk of bias was considered low in 8 SRs (34.7%). The modified AMSTAR-2 tool showed important methodological gaps. CONCLUSIONS: Identification of procedural-modifiable factors, such as intra-articular corticoids use, can give patients better results. Overlapping between SR was very high, meaning that some SRs are redundant. The evidence on risk factors for prosthetic joint infection is weak due to high risk of bias and limited methodological quality.

Papel de los factores inflamatorios sistémicos en los tumores neuroendocrinos gastroenteropancreáticos (TNE-GEP) tratados con péptidos marcados con radionúclidos (PRRT): de la biología a la teragnosis / Role of systemic inflammatory factors in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) treated with peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT): From biology to theragnosis

Objetivo Los índices inflamatorios sistémicos se han validado como indicadores de inflamación sistémica como marcadores predictivos de mal pronóstico para diversas enfermedades oncológicas. Sin embargo, se desconoce el impacto pronóstico de los marcadores de inflamación sistémica en pacientes con tumores neuroendocrinos gastroenteropancreáticos (TNE-GEP) tratados con péptidos marcados con radionúclidos (PRRT). Métodos Realizamos un estudio observacional, retrospectivo, multicéntrico de 40 pacientes con TNEs-GEP y TNE de origen desconocido tratados con PRRT entre el 2016 y el 2020. Los marcadores inflamatorios sistémicos se calcularon de la siguiente manera: relación neutrófilos a linfocitos (NLR)=recuento de neutrófilos/recuento de linfocitos, relación de monocitos a linfocitos (MLR)=recuento de monocitos/recuento de linfocitos, relación de plaquetas a linfocitos (PLR)=recuento de plaquetas/recuento de linfocitos, relación de albúmina a linfocitos (ALR)=niveles de albúmina/recuento de linfocitos y relación derivada de neutrófilos a linfocitos (dNLR)=recuento de neutrófilos/(recuento de leucocitos – recuento de neutrófilos). Se utilizaron datos analíticos basales pretratamiento y después de la segunda dosis para el cálculo de los distintos índices. Resultados La mediana de edad fue de 63 años (rango 41-85), el 55% eran hombres. Los valores de corte de referencia para NLR fueron 2,61, para MLR 0,31, para PLR 110,14, para ALR 2,39 y para dNLR 1,71. Los valores de corte después de la segunda dosis fueron, para NLR 2,3, para MLR 0,3, para PLR 131,61, ALR 4,16 y dNLR 1,48. La mediana de la sobrevivencia libre de progresión (SLP) fue de 21,7 meses (IC del 95%: 10,7-32,8 m) y la supervivencia global (SG) fue de 32,1 meses (IC del 95%: 19,6-44,7 m), la SLP fue más corta en pacientes con NLR elevado (p=0,001), ALR (0,03) y dNLR (p=0,001) en el análisis basal. La tasa de control de enfermedad (DCR) fue del 81% y la tasa de respuesta objetiva (ORR) del 18% (AU)

Aim Systemic inflammatory factors have been validated as indicators of ongoing systemic inflammation that could be predictive markers of poor prognosis for oncological outcomes. However, the prognostic impact of systemic inflammation markers is unknown in patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) treated with peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT). Methods We conducted an observational, retrospective, multicentric study of 40 patients with GEP or unknown origin NETs treated with PRRT between 2016 and 2020. The systemic inflammatory markers were calculated as follows: neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR)=neutrophil count/lymphocyte count, monocyte to lymphocyte ratio (MLR)=monocyte count/lymphocyte count, platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR)=platelet count/lymphocyte count, albumin to lymphocyte ratio (ALR)=albumin levels/lymphocyte count and derived Neutrophil to Lymphocyte ratio (dNLR)=neutrophil count/(leucocytes count – neutrophils count). Baseline analysis and after the second dose were used for the calculation of different ratios. Results The median age was 63 years (range 41–85), 55% were male. The baseline cut-off values for NLR were 2.61, for MLR 0.31, for PLR 110.14, for ALR 2.39 and for dNLR 1.71. The cut-off values after the 2° dose were, for NLR 2.3, for MLR 0.3, for PLR 131.61, ALR 4.16, and dNLR 1.48. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 21.7 months (95% CI 10.7–32.8 months) and overall survival (OS) was 32.1 months (95% CI 19.6–44.7 months), PFS was shorter in patients with elevated NLR (P=0.001), ALR (0.03), and dNLR (P=0.001) in baseline analysis. DCR was 81% and ORR 18%. Conclusions In GEP or unknown origin NETs treated with PRRT, we have identified the predictive and prognostic impact of baseline systemic inflammatory factors (AU)

Role of systemic inflammatory factors in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) treated with peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT): From biology to theragnosis.

AIM: Systemic inflammatory factors have been validated as indicators of ongoing systemic inflammation that could be predictive markers of poor prognosis for oncological outcomes. However, the prognostic impact of systemic inflammation markers is unknown in patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) treated with peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT). METHODS: We conducted an observational, retrospective, multicentric study of 40 patients with GEP or unknown origin NETs treated with PRRT between 2016 and 2020. The systemic inflammatory markers were calculated as follows: neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR)=neutrophil count/lymphocyte count, monocyte to lymphocyte ratio (MLR)=monocyte count/lymphocyte count, platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR)=platelet count/lymphocyte count, albumin to lymphocyte ratio (ALR)=albumin levels/lymphocyte count and derived Neutrophil to Lymphocyte ratio (dNLR)=neutrophil count/(leucocytes count - neutrophils count). Baseline analysis and after the second dose were used for the calculation of different ratios. RESULTS: The median age was 63 years (range 41-85), 55% were male. The baseline cut-off values for NLR were 2.61, for MLR 0.31, for PLR 110.14, for ALR 2.39 and for dNLR 1.71. The cut-off values after the 2° dose were, for NLR 2.3, for MLR 0.3, for PLR 131.61, ALR 4.16, and dNLR 1.48. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 21.7 months (95% CI 10.7-32.8 months) and overall survival (OS) was 32.1 months (95% CI 19.6-44.7 months), PFS was shorter in patients with elevated NLR (p=0.001), ALR (0.03), and dNLR (p=0.001) in baseline analysis. DCR was 81% and ORR 18%. CONCLUSIONS: In GEP or unknown origin NETs treated with PRRT, we have identified the predictive and prognostic impact of baseline systemic inflammatory factors.

Impacto de los días transcurridos desde el inicio de los síntomas hasta la hospitalización en la mortalidad hospitalaria por COVID-19: el tiempo importa / Impact of days elapsed from the onset of symptoms to hospitalization in COVID-19 in-hospital mortality: Time matters

Antecedentes La COVID-19 muestra diferentes fases clínicas y fisiopatológicas a lo largo del tiempo. El efecto de los días transcurridos desde el comienzo de los síntomas (DTCS) hasta la hospitalización sobre los factores pronósticos de la COVID-19 sigue siendo incierto. Analizamos el impacto en la mortalidad de los DTCS hasta la hospitalización y cómo se comportan otros factores pronósticos independientes al tener en cuenta dicho tiempo transcurrido. Métodos En este estudio de cohortes nacional retrospectivo se incluyó a pacientes con COVID-19 confirmada entre el 20 de febrero y el 6 de mayo de 2020. Los datos se recopilaron en un registro normalizado de captura de datos en línea. Se realizó una regresión de Cox uni y multifactorial en la cohorte general y el modelo multifactorial final se sometió a un análisis de sensibilidad en un grupo de presentación precoz (PP) < 5 DTCS y otro de presentación tardía (PT) ≥ 5 DTCS). Resultados En el análisis se incluyó a 7.915 pacientes con COVID-19, 2.324 en el grupo de PP y 5.591 en el de PT. Los DTCS hasta la hospitalización fueron un factor pronóstico independiente de mortalidad intrahospitalaria en el modelo de regresión de Cox multifactorial junto con otras nueve variables. Cada incremento en un DTCS supuso una reducción del riesgo de mortalidad del 4,3% (RRI = 0,957; IC 95%, 0,93-0,98). En cuanto a las variaciones de otros factores predictivos de la mortalidad en el análisis de sensibilidad, únicamente el índice de comorbilidad de Charlson siguió siendo significativo en el grupo de PP, mientras que únicamente el dímero D lo siguió siendo en el grupo de PT. Conclusiones Al atender a pacientes con COVID-19 hay que tener en cuenta los DTCS hasta la hospitalización porque la necesidad de hospitalización precoz confiere un mayor riesgo de mortalidad. Los diferentes factores pronósticos varían con el tiempo y deberían estudiarse dentro de un marco temporal fijo de la enfermedad (AU)

Background COVID-19 shows different clinical and pathophysiological stages over time. Theeffect of days elapsed from the onset of symptoms (DEOS) to hospitalization on COVID-19prognostic factors remains uncertain. We analyzed the impact on mortality of DEOS to hospital-ization and how other independent prognostic factors perform when taking this time elapsedinto account. Methods This retrospective, nationwide cohort study, included patients with confirmed COVID-19 from February 20th and May 6th, 2020. The data was collected in a standardized online datacapture registry. Univariate and multivariate COX-regression were performed in the generalcohort and the final multivariate model was subjected to a sensitivity analysis in an earlypresenting (EP; <5 DEOS) and late presenting (LP; ≥5 DEOS) group. Results 7915 COVID-19 patients were included in the analysis, 2324 in the EP and 5591 in theLP group. DEOS to hospitalization was an independent prognostic factor of in-hospital mortalityin the multivariate Cox regression model along with other 9 variables. Each DEOS incrementaccounted for a 4.3% mortality risk reduction (HR 0.957; 95% CI 0.93---0.98). Regarding variationsin other mortality predictors in the sensitivity analysis, the Charlson Comorbidity Index onlyremained significant in the EP group while D-dimer only remained significant in the LP group. Conclusion When caring for COVID-19 patients, DEOS to hospitalization should be consideredas their need for early hospitalization confers a higher risk of mortality. Different prognosticfactors vary over time and should be studied within a fixed timeframe of the disease (AU)

Overview of systematic reviews of risk factors for prosthetic joint infection. / Revisión de revisiones sistemáticas de factores pronóstico para infección protésica.

BACKGROUND: Prosthetic joint infection is one of the most serious complications in orthopedics. Prognostic systematic reviews (SR) detecting and assessing factors related to prosthetic joint infection, allow better prediction of risk and implementation of preventive measures. Although prognostic SR are increasingly frequent, their methodological field presents some knowledge gaps. PURPOSE: To carry out an overview of SR assessing risk factors for prosthetic joint infection, describing and synthesizing their evidence. Secondarily, to assess the risk of bias and methodological quality. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a bibliographic search in 4databases (May 2021) to identify prognostic SR evaluating any risk factor for prosthetic joint infection. We evaluated risk of bias with the ROBIS tool, and methodological quality with a modified AMSTAR-2 tool. We computed the overlap degree study between included SR. RESULTS: Twenty-three SR were included, studying 15 factors for prosthetic joint infection, of which, 13 had significant association. The most frequently studied risk factors were obesity, intra-articular corticosteroids, smoking and uncontrolled diabetes. Overlapping between SR was high for obesity and very high for intra-articular corticoid injection, smoking and uncontrolled diabetes. Risk of bias was considered low in 8SRs (34.7%). The modified AMSTAR-2 tool showed important methodological gaps. CONCLUSIONS: Identification of procedural-modifiable factors, such as intra-articular corticoids use, can give patients better results. Overlapping between SR was very high, meaning that some SR are redundant. The evidence on risk factors for prosthetic joint infection is weak due to high risk of bias and limited methodological quality.

Impact of days elapsed from the onset of symptoms to hospitalization in COVID-19 in-hospital mortality: time matters.

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 shows different clinical and pathophysiological stages over time. The effect of days elapsed from the onset of symptoms (DEOS) to hospitalization on COVID-19 prognostic factors remains uncertain. We analyzed the impact on mortality of DEOS to hospitalization and how other independent prognostic factors perform when taking this time elapsed into account. METHODS: This retrospective, nationwide cohort study, included patients with confirmed COVID-19 from February 20th and May 6th, 2020. The data was collected in a standardized online data capture registry. Univariate and multivariate COX-regression were performed in the general cohort and the final multivariate model was subjected to a sensitivity analysis in an early presenting (EP; <5 DEOS) and late presenting (LP; ≥5 DEOS) group. RESULTS: 7915 COVID-19 patients were included in the analysis, 2324 in the EP and 5591 in the LP group. DEOS to hospitalization was an independent prognostic factor of in-hospital mortality in the multivariate Cox regression model along with other 9 variables. Each DEOS increment accounted for a 4.3% mortality risk reduction (HR 0.957; 95% CI 0.93-0.98). Regarding variations in other mortality predictors in the sensitivity analysis, the Charlson Comorbidity Index only remained significant in the EP group while D-dimer only remained significant in the LP group. CONCLUSION: When caring for COVID-19 patients, DEOS to hospitalization should be considered as their need for early hospitalization confers a higher risk of mortality. Different prognostic factors vary over time and should be studied within a fixed timeframe of the disease.

Linfoma no Hodgkin de células B primario de mama. Reporte de caso y revisión de la literatura / Primary breast B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma of the breast. Case Report and review of the literature

Objetivos: Reportar un caso de linfoma no Hodgkin de células B primario de mama (LPM) y realizar una revisión de la literatura de su diagnóstico y tratamiento. Materiales y métodos: Se reporta el caso de una paciente de 80 años que acudió a una institución privada de referencia en México por un LPM. Además, se diagnosticó un melanoma primario de hígado, mediante biopsia dirigida y estudio de patología. La paciente recibió tratamiento con R-CHOP (rituximab, ciclofosfamida, doxorrubicina, vincristina y prednisona), cuadrantectomía, resección de cadenas ganglionares y radioterapia. La paciente presenta adecuada respuesta del LPM, sin embargo, el segundo tumor primario progresa llevando a la paciente a cuidados paliativos. Se realizó una búsqueda bibliográfica en Medline vía PubMed, LILACS y Google Scholar. Se incluyeron estudios de cohortes, reportes y series de casos en pacientes con LPM que abordaran el diagnóstico, tratamiento y pronóstico de esta patología, publicados en inglés y español entre los años 2000 a 2022. Resultados: Se identificaron 23 títulos, de los cuales 17 cumplieron con los criterios de inclusión, estos fueron reportes de caso y series de caso. La mayoría de las pacientes recibió un esquema quimioterapéutico R-CHOP, el cual se complementó con radioterapia. Cerca del 80 % presentó remisión completa. El sitio más frecuente de recaída fue el sistema nervioso central. La sobrevida a 5 años fue del 83,6 % en los estudios incluidos. Conclusiones: En la actualidad, el esquema CHOP -con o sin rituximab- es el más empleado y el único que ha mostrado tener un impacto positivo en la supervivencia, este suele acompañarse de radioterapia. Se requieren más estudios clínicos aleatorizados para establecer de manera más clara la efectividad y seguridad de estos tratamientos.

Objectives: To report a case of primary breast B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (PBL) and to conduct a literature review of its diagnosis and treatment. Material and methods: Case report of an 80-year-old female patient who presented to a private referral institution in Mexico, with PBL. She was also diagnosed with primary liver melanoma by means of targeted biopsy and pathology testing. The patient received treatment with R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone), quadrantectomy, lymph node dissection and radiotherapy. The PBL showed good response but, because of progression of the second primary tumor, the patient went on to receive palliative care. A review of the literature was conducted in Medline via PubMed, LILACS and Google Scholar. Cohort studies, case reports and case series in patients with PBL that discussed diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of this disease, published in English and Spanish between 2000 and 2022, were included. Results: Overall, 23 titles were identified, of which 17 consisting of case reports and case series met the inclusion criteria. The majority of patients received R-CHOP as chemotherapy regimen, with irradiation as adjunct therapy. Close to 80 % went into complete remission. The most frequent site of recurrence was the central nervous system. Five-year survival was 83.6 % in the included studies. Conclusions: At present, the CHOP regimen, with or without rituximab and usually accompanied by radiotherapy, is the most widely used and the only one that has shown a positive impact on survival. Additional randomized clinical trials are needed in order to gain a clearer insight into the effectiveness and safety of these treatments.

Análisis estadístico implicativo para identificar factores pronósticos de mortalidad por linfomas en niños y adolescentes

Fundamento: el análisis estadístico implicativo surgió en los años 80 para resolver problemas de la didáctica de las matemáticas. Recientemente se fundamentó su empleo en las Ciencias Médicas para identificar factores de riesgo y pronósticos. Objetivo: evaluar la utilidad del análisis estadístico implicativo en la identificación de los factores pronósticos que más inciden en la mortalidad por linfomas en niños y adolescentes. Método: se realizó un estudio de casos y controles en niños y adolescentes con diagnóstico de linfoma Hodgkin y no Hodgkin atendidos en el Hospital Docente Pediátrico Sur Dr. Antonio María Béguez César de Santiago de Cuba en el período de enero 2008 a enero 2021. Se analizó como variable dependiente el estado del paciente fallecido o vivo al momento del estudio y como covariables se tomaron: el estadio de mal pronóstico, la presencia de síntomas B, el subtipo histológico, la presencia de tres o más sitios extraganglionares, la metástasis, edad y presencia de masa tumoral. Se aplicaron dos técnicas estadísticas, la regresión logística binaria y el análisis estadístico implicativo. Resultados en los casos fue más frecuente el linfoma no Hodgkin mientras que en los controles predominó el Hodgkin. Ambas técnicas reconocieron el subtipo histológico y la afectación extraganglionar como factores pronósticos desfavorables. El análisis estadístico implicativo reconoció además el estadio y la presencia de metástasis. Conclusión: el análisis estadístico implicativo es una técnica que complementa la regresión logística binaria en la identificación de factores pronósticos, lo que permite mejor comprensión de la causalidad.

Background: the implicative statistical analysis arose in the 80s to solve problems in the didactics of mathematics. Its use in the Medical Sciences to identify risk factors and prognoses was recently founded. Objective: to evaluate the usefulness of the implicative statistical analysis in the identification of the prognostic factors that most affect mortality from lymphomas in children and adolescents. Method: a case-control study was carried out in children and adolescents diagnosed with Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma treated at the Dr. Antonio María Béguez César Sur Pediatric Teaching Hospital in Santiago de Cuba from January 2008 to January 2021. The state of the deceased or alive patient at the time of the study was analyzed as the dependent variable and the following were taken as covariates: poor prognosis stage, presence of B symptoms, histological subtype, presence of three or more extranodal sites, metastasis, age and presence of tumor mass. Two statistical techniques were applied: binary logistic regression and implicative statistical analysis. Results: non-Hodgkin's lymphoma was more frequent in the cases, while Hodgkin's lymphoma predominated in the controls. Both techniques recognized the histological subtype and extranodal involvement as unfavorable prognostic factors. The implicative statistical analysis also recognized the stage and the presence of metastases. Conclusion: the implicative statistical analysis is a technique that complements the binary logistic regression in the identification of prognostic factors, which allows a better understanding of causality.

Análisis de supervivencia e identificación de factores pronósticos de metástasis hepáticas de cáncer colorrectal tras resección hepática / Survival analysis and identification of prognostic factors in colorectal liver metastasis after liver resection

Introducción: El único tratamiento curativo para las metástasis hepáticas de cáncer colorrectal es la cirugía. La identificación de factores pronósticos nos permite individualizar el tratamiento de estos pacientes, mejorando sus resultados oncológicos a largo plazo. El objetivo de nuestro estudio es identificar la supervivencia y los factores pronósticos de pacientes sometidos a tratamiento quirúrgico de metástasis hepáticas de cáncer colorrectal. Métodos: Se trata de un estudio retrospectivo de todos los casos de hepatectomías por metástasis hepáticas de cáncer colorrectal, operadas en un hospital de tercer nivel en España, entre los años 2010 y 2018. Se realizó análisis de supervivencia univariante con las curvas de supervivencia Kaplan-Meier. Mediante el modelo multivariante regresión de Cox se determinaron los factores pronósticos asociados a la supervivencia global. Resultados: La supervivencia global y supervivencia libre de enfermedad de nuestra serie, a los 5 años fue del 43% y del 33%, respectivamente. En el análisis de supervivencia, las características de las metástasis hepáticas (números, tamaño mayor, distribución bilobar y enfermedad extrahepática) y postoperatorias (transfusión sanguínea, complicaciones graves y margen afecto), así como el KRAS no mutado resultaron estadísticamente significativos. No obstante, después de aplicar la regresión de Cox, solo se identificaron 5 factores de riesgo independientes: mutación del KRAS, metástasis hepáticas >4cm, transfusión intraoperatoria, complicaciones graves y margen afecto. Conclusiones: En nuestro grupo de pacientes hemos observado que el tamaño>4cm de la metástasis hepáticas, la transfusión intraoperatoria, las complicaciones posquirúrgicas graves y el margen afecto se mantienen como factores pronósticos tradicionales vigentes. Mientras que el biomarcador KRAS cobra un valor predictivo importante como factor pronóstico de supervivencia. (AU)

Introduction: Liver resection is the only curative treatment for colorectal liver metastasis. The identification of predictive factors leads to personalize patient management to enhance their long-term outcomes. This population-based study aimed to characterize factors associated with, and survival impact of patients who received hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastasis. Methods: A retrospective cohort study of all the hepatectomies for colorectal liver metastasis performed at third-level hospital of Spain (2010–2018) was conducted. The Kaplan–Meier method was used for survival analyses. Multivariable Cox and regression models were used to determine prognostic factors associated with overall survival. Results: The 5-year overall survival and disease-free survival were 42 and 33%, respectively. Survival analysis showed that metastasis features (number, largest size, distribution, and extrahepatic disease) and postsurgical factors (transfusion, major complications, and positive margin resection), as well as non-mutated KRAS, showed a significant association with survival. Otherwise, on multivariate analysis, only 5 independent risk factors were identified: major size metastasis>4cm, RAS mutation, positive margin resection, intraoperative transfusion, and major complications. Conclusions: According to our findings, major size metastasis>4cm, intraoperative transfusion, and major postoperative complications continue to be traditional prognostic factors. Meanwhile, the KRAS biomarker has a powerful impact as a survival prognostic factor. (AU)