Immediate sphincter repair following fistulotomy for anal fistula: does it impact the healing rate and septic complications?

PURPOSE: Fistulotomy is considered the most effective treatment for anal fistula; however, it carries a risk of incontinence. Sphincteroplasty in the setting of fistulotomy is not standard practice due to concerns regarding healing and potential infectious complications. We aimed to compare the outcomes of patients who underwent fistulotomy with primary sphincteroplasty to those who did not undergo repair. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of consecutive patients who underwent fistulotomy for cryptoglandular anal fistula. All operations were performed by one colorectal surgeon. Sphincteroplasty was performed for patients perceived to be at higher risk for continence disturbance. The main outcome measures were the healing rate and postoperative septic complications. RESULTS: In total, 152 patients were analyzed. Group A (fistulotomy with sphincteroplasty) consisted of 45 patients and group B (fistulotomy alone) included 107 patients. Both groups were similar in age (P=0.16) and sex (P=0.20). Group A had higher proportions of multiple fistulas (26.7% vs. 6.5%, P<0.01) and complex fistulas (mid to high transsphincteric, 37.8% vs. 10.3%; P<0.01) than group B. The median follow-up time was 8 weeks. The overall healing rate was similar in both groups (93.3% vs. 90.6%, P=0.76). No significant difference between the 2 groups was noted in septic complications (6.7% vs. 3.7%, P=0.42). CONCLUSION: Fistulotomy with primary sphincter repair demonstrated a comparable healing rate to fistulotomy alone, without an increased risk of postoperative septic complications. Further prospective randomized studies are needed to confirm these findings and to explore the functional outcomes of patients who undergo sphincteroplasty.

Rectovaginal Fistulas Not Involving the Rectovaginal Septum Should Be Treated Like Anal Fistulas: A New Concept and Proposal for a Reclassification of Rectovaginal Fistulas.

Background: Many rectovaginal fistulas(RVF), especially low RVF, do not involve/penetrate the RV-septum, but due to lack of proper nomenclature, such fistulas are also managed like RVF (undertaking repair of RV-septum) and inadvertently lead to the formation of a high RVF (involving RV-septum) in many cases. Therefore, REctovaginal Fistulas, Not Involving the Rectovaginal Septum, should be Treated like Anal fistulas(RENISTA) to prevent any risk of injury to the RV septum. This concept(RENISTA) was tested in this study. Methods: RVFs not involving RV-septum were managed like anal fistulas, and the RV-septum was not cut/incised. MRI, objective incontinence scoring, and anal manometry were done preoperatively and postoperatively. High RVF (involving RV-septum) were excluded. Results: Twenty-seven patients with low RVF (not involving RV-septum) were operated like anal fistula[age:35.2±9.2 years, median follow-up-15 months (3-36 months)]. 19/27 were low fistula[<1/3 external anal sphincter(EAS) involved] and fistulotomy was performed, whereas 8/27 were high fistula (>1/3 EAS involved) and underwent a sphincter-sparing procedure. Three patients were excluded. The fistula healed well in 22/24 (91.7%) patients and did not heal in 2/24 (8.3%). The healing was confirmed on MRI, and there was no significant change in mean incontinence scores and anal pressures on tonometry. RV-septum injury did not occur in any patient. Conclusions: RVF not involving RV-septum were managed like anal fistulas with a high cure rate and no significant change in continence. RV-septum injury or formation of RVF with septum involvement did not occur in any patient. The RENISTA concept was validated in the present study. A new classification was developed to prevent any inadvertent injury to the RV-septum.

Endoscopic Hemostatic Treatment with a Novel Self-Assembling Peptide Gel for Precut Fistulotomy-Related Bleeding.

Introduction: Precut fistulotomy is of interest as one of the salvage techniques for selective bile duct cannulation using endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Of the various endoscopic treatments reported to date for bleeding associated with papillotomy incision, endoscopic hemostasis treatment with a novel self-assembling peptide (SAP) matrix-forming gel (TDM-621) (3-D Matrix Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) remains only insufficiently reported in the literature. Case Presentation: We herein report 6 cases of precut fistulotomy-related bleeding successfully treated with endoscopic hemostasis treatment with TDM-621, i.e., 5 and 1 cases during and after precut fistulotomy, respectively, in 2 males and 4 females aged 68-96 years (mean age, 85 years), 3 of whom had been on antithrombotic drugs. Types of bleeding treated included oozing bleeding (n = 5) and oozing bleeding from a visible vessel (n = 1). In all cases, complete hemostasis was achieved with TDM-621 without causing rebleeding. Conclusion: Endoscopic hemostasis with TDM-621 may prove effective for precut fistulotomy-related bleeding and represent a potential modality of first choice in hemostasis. In addition, endoscopic hemostasis with combined modality therapy using TDM-621 and endoscopic hemoclips may prove effective for bleeding from visible vessels.

Estudio observacional nacional sobre tratamiento quirúrgico de fístula anal: ¿tiene impacto en los resultados el tipo de hospital? / National observational study about the surgical treatment of anal fistula: does the kind of hospital modify the results?

Introducción: En algunos procedimientos quirúrgicos se ha demostrado que la centralización en hospitales de alto volumen mejora los resultados obtenidos. Sin embargo, este punto aún no ha sido estudiado en los pacientes que son intervenidos por una fístula anal (FA). Material y métodos: Se realizó un estudio multicéntrico retrospectivo en el que se incluyeron los pacientes operados de FA durante el año 2019 en 56 centros españoles. Se hizo un análisis uni y multivariante para analizar la relación entre el tamaño del lugar, el porcentaje de curación de la fístula y el desarrollo de incontinencia fecal (IF). Resultados: Se incluyeron en el estudio a 1.809 pacientes. La cirugía se llevó a cabo en un hospital pequeño en 127 usuarios (7,0%), uno mediano en 571 (31,6%) y uno grande en 1.111 (61,4%). Tras un seguimiento medio de 18,9 meses, 72,3% de los participantes (1.303) se consideraron curados y 132 (7,6%) presentaron IF. El porcentaje de los rehabilitados de la FA fue de 74,8, 75,8 y 70,3% (p = 0,045) en los centros pequeño, mediano y grande, respectivamente. En cuanto a la IF no se evidenciaron diferencias significativas según el tipo de lugar (4,8, 8,0 y 7,7%, respectivamente, p = 0,473). En el análisis multivariante no se observó relación entre el tamaño del hospital y la curación de la fístula o el desarrollo de IF. Conclusión: Los resultados de curación e IF posoperatoria en los pacientes sometidos a una cirugía por FA fueron independientes del volumen hospitalario.(AU)

Introduction: Performing the surgical procedure in a high-volume center has been seen to be important for some surgical procedures. However, this issue has not been studied for patients with an Anal Fistula (AF). Material and methods: A retrospective multicentric study was performed including the patients who underwent AF surgery in 2019 in 56 Spanish hospitals. A univariate and multivariate analysis was performed to analyse the relationship between hospital volume and AF cure and Fecal Incontinence (FI). Results: 1809 patients were include. Surgery was performed in a low, middle, and high-volume hospitals in 127 (7.0%), 571 (31.6%) y 1111 (61.4%) patients respectively. After a mean follow-up of 18.9 months 72.3% (1303) patients were cured and 132 (7.6%) developed FI. The percentage of patients cured was 74.8%, 75.8% and 70.3% (p=0.045) for low, middle, and high-volume hospitals. Regarding FI, no statistically significant differences were observed depending on the hospital volume (4.8%, 8.0% and 7.7% respectively, p=0.473). Multivariate analysis didńt observe a relationship between AF cure and FI. Conclusion: Cure and FI in patients who underwent AF surgery were independent from hospital volume.(AU)

National observational study about the surgical treatment of anal fistula: Does the kind of hospital modify the results?

INTRODUCTION: Performing the surgical procedure in a high-volume center has been seen to be important for some surgical procedures. However, this issue has not been studied for patients with an anal fistula (AF). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective multicentric study was performed including the patients who underwent AF surgery in 2019 in 56 Spanish hospitals. A univariate and multivariate analysis was performed to analyse the relationship between hospital volume and AF cure and fecal incontinence (FI). RESULTS: 1809 patients were include. Surgery was performed in a low, middle, and high-volume hospitals in 127 (7.0%), 571 (31.6%) y 1111 (61.4%) patients respectively. After a mean follow-up of 18.9 months 72.3% (1303) patients were cured and 132 (7.6%) developed FI. The percentage of patients cured was 74.8%, 75.8% and 70.3% (p = 0.045) for low, middle, and high-volume hospitals. Regarding FI, no statistically significant differences were observed depending on the hospital volume (4.8%, 8.0% and 7.7% respectively, p = 0.473). Multivariate analysis didnt observe a relationship between AF cure and FI. CONCLUSION: Cure and FI in patients who underwent AF surgery were independent from hospital volume.

Contemporary management of anorectal fistula.

Anorectal fistula is a common, chronic condition, and is primarily managed surgically. Herein, we provide a contemporary review of the relevant etiology and anatomy anorectal fistula, treatment recommendations that summarize relevant outcomes and alternative considerations, in particular when to refer to a fistula expert.

Characteristics and post-operative outcomes of surgery for fistula-in-ano managed at a tertiary care hospital in Sri Lanka: a retrospective study.

OBJECTIVES: Management of fistula-in-ano is associated with recurrence and, occasionally, with anal incontinence. We investigated the clinical characteristics and outcomes of fistula-in-ano. METHODS: We included patients with fistula-in-ano managed at a tertiary care center (2016-2021). We collected clinical characteristics and 1-year outcomes using questionnaires. The chi-square test was used in statistical analysis. RESULTS: In total, 284 patients (231 men, 81.3%; median age 39.5 [range: 7-73] years) were included. Most patients had simple fistulae (n = 191, 67.3%). Transphincteric (n = 110, 38.7%) fistulae were the most common type, followed by intersphinteric fistulae (n = 103, 36.6%). Fistulotomy (n = 157, 55.3%) was the most common procedure. Follow-up details were traceable in 157 (55.3%) patients. At 1 year, the overall healing rate was 88.5% (n = 136). There was no association between type of surgical procedure and incontinence. The mean Vaizey score, used to assess anal incontinence, was 0.84 (range: 0-14). Incontinence was observed in 32 patients (20.9%), and flatus incontinence was the most common type (n = 17, 53.1%). Complex fistulae were associated with higher recurrence rates than simple fistulae (32.6% vs. 2.8%). CONCLUSION: The healing rate in surgical treatment of fistula-in-ano was 88.5%, with acceptable complication rates. There was no association between surgical procedure type and incontinence.

A comparative study between high ligation of the inter-sphincteric fistula tract via lateral Approach Versus Fistulotomy and primary sphincteroplasty in High Trans-Sphincteric Fistula-in-Ano: a randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Trans-sphincteric fistula management is very challenging and everyday new techniques are introduced to reach the safest and the most effective technique. In this study two of the most effective techniques are compared based on their post-operative outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of high ligation of the inter-sphincteric fistula tract by lateral approach (modified LIFT) and Fistulotomy and primary sphincteroplasty (FIPS) in the management of high trans-sphincteric fistula regarding their post-operative outcomes in the form of post-operative pain, time of wound healing in weeks, wound infection, incontinence and recurrence within one year. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The current study is single-blind, prospective, randomized, controlled, single-center trial conducted from June 2020 to June 2022 in the colorectal surgical unit of Ain Shams University Hospitals, which included 80 patients presented with high trans-sphincteric perianal fistula 55 (68.75%) males and 25 (31.25%) including a one-year follow-up postoperative. RESULTS: There were 80 patients in our study 40 patients in each group. The mean age of group (I) is 46.65 with standard deviation 6.6. while, in group (II) the mean age is 45.85 with standard deviation 6.07 (p = 0.576). From the included 80 patients 55(68.7%) were males and 25 (31.25%) were females (p = 0.469). Regarding, postoperative wound infection occurred in 2(5%) Patients in group (I) and 7(17.5%) patients in group (II) (p = 0.154). There were no cases of incontinence in group I. However, there were 6(15%) cases of incontinence to gases only scored by Wexner score 3/20 in group II (p = 0.026) and its significant difference between the two techniques. Postoperative pain was assessed for one week duration by the visual analogue score (VAS) from 0 to 10 in which, zero is the least and 10 is the maximum. In group (I) 18(45%) patients scored their pain mild from 1 to 3, 20(50%) patients scored their pain moderate from 4 to 6 and 2(5%) patients scored severe pain from 7 to 9. While, in group (II) 14(35%) patients scored their pain mild from 1 to 3, 22(55%) patients their pain moderate from 4 to 6 and 4(10%) patients scored their pain severe from 7 to 9 (p = 0.275). Recurrence in one-year follow-up occurred in 13(32.5%) patients in group (I) about 7 patients had recurrence in the form of inter-sphincteric fistula and 6 patients in the form of trans-sphincteric fistula. While, in group II recurrence occurred in 1 (2.5%) patient in the form of subcutaneous fistula at the healing site (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Fistulotomy and primary sphincteroplasty is an effective and preferred technique for the trans-sphincteric fistula repair with high statistically significant lower incidence of recurrence in one-year follow-up as compared to modified LIFT technique. Although, there is higher incidence regarding incontinence to gases only post-operative. This work recommends fistulotomy and primary sphincter reconstruction procedure in high trans-sphincteric perianal fistulas to be more popular, to be implemented as a corner stone procedure along various and classic operations for such cases as it's easy, feasible.

Analysis of Ambulatory Proctologic Surgery for Simple Anal Fistulas in Terms of Recovery, Complications, Recurrence, and Cost.

Background Ambulatory anorectal surgeries have increased in the last few years. This clinical study aimed to compare general operating room conditions with outpatient procedures for simple anal fistulas in terms of healing success, recurrence, cost, complications, and sustainability. Methodology Only primary fistulotomy and seton application for simple anal fistulas were retrospectively analyzed. Results Two-hundred fifty patients (73.7%) were male, and 89 (26.3%) were female. Sixty patients (17.7%) were treated in the operating room, and 279 (82.3%) were treated in the outpatient clinic conditions. Of the ambulatory surgeries, 160 patients underwent fistulotomy and 119 patients loose seton. On the other hand, 34 patients underwent fistulotomy and 26 patients loose seton in operating room conditions. No significant difference was found between the groups according to the distribution of age, gender, complications, and recurrence (P > 0.05). Cost-effectiveness assessment according to the place (ambulatory/operating room) and type of operation (fistulotomy/loose seton) reveals that ambulatory surgery provides significantly more savings (P < 0.001). Conclusions For simple anal fistulas, ambulatory anorectal surgery is a safe approach that can be performed at a lower cost than operating room conditions.

Anal fistulotomy with one-stage shaped skin grafting for intersphincter anal fistulas: study protocol on a multicentre randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Anal fistulas are mainly treated via surgery. They can be difficult to treat without surgical intervention. Numerous procedures, such as fistulectomy and fistulotomy, are performed to treat anal fistulas and achieve good effects. However, the wounds created through fistulectomy and fistulotomy take a long time to heal. Therefore, a multicentre randomised controlled trial (RCT) is proposed to study the efficacy of one-stage shaped skin grafting at the surgical wound to heal low simple intersphincter anal fistulas. METHODS: This study is a multicentre, hospital-based RCT. It will be performed at three hospitals. A total of 104 patients with low simple intersphincter anal fistulas who meet the inclusion criteria will be included in this trial and will be allocated randomly to two groups (test and control groups). The patients in the test group will receive one-stage anal fistulotomy surgery combined with shaped skin grafting, and those in the control group will undergo anal fistulotomy only. All the operations will be performed by attending colorectal surgeons or surgeons of a higher level. Effectiveness and safety indicators will be observed, recorded and analysed. DISCUSSION: Anal fistulotomy can heal low simple intersphincter anal fistulas effectively and safely with a low recurrence rate. Skin grafts promote wound epithelisation significantly. We believe that skin grafting can treat low simple intersphincter fistulas with a short healing time. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Register, ChiCTR2000039174. Registered on 28 October 2020.

A Comparison of Laser and Fistulotomy Techniques in the Treatment of Fistula-in-Ano.

Background Anal fistulas are a common complication of perianal abscesses. The treatment of anal fistulas is challenging, with persistent and high recurrence rates. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of laser ablation compared to fistulotomy in the treatment of anal fistulas. Materials and methods The patients were examined for external and internal openings of the fistula, its number, length, type, relationship with the sphincters, and any previous history of abscess or proctological surgery. The surgical procedures, complications, incontinence, recurrence, and recovery time were evaluated and compared between the two groups. The laser ablation group received an intermittent laser application at a wavelength of 1470 nm and 10 watts for three seconds, while the fistulotomy group underwent cutting of the fistula tract with electrocautery while keeping a stylet in place. Results A total of 253 patients were included in this retrospective study, with 149 patients undergoing fistulotomy and 104 patients undergoing laser ablation. The patients were evaluated based on the type, number, and location of internal and external openings, and the length of the fistula tract according to the Parks classification. The mean follow-up period was 9.0±4.3 months. The results showed that the laser group had a shorter time to return to work and less postoperative pain compared to the fistulotomy group. However, the recurrence rate was higher in the laser group. The recurrence rate was also found to be higher in patients with low transsphincteric fistulas and in patients with diabetes mellitus. Conclusion Our study findings indicate that while laser ablation may be associated with less pain and quicker recovery time, it may also have a higher recurrence rate compared to fistulotomy. We believe that laser ablation is a valuable option for surgeons to consider early on in the treatment process, especially in cases where fistulotomy is not suitable.

Safety and feasibility of opening window fistulotomy as a new precutting technique for primary biliary access in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis (PEP) is the most common and serious complication of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. To prevent this event, a unique precutting method, termed opening window fistulotomy, was performed in patients with a large infundibulum as the primary procedure for biliary cannulation, whereby a suprapapillary laid-down H-shaped incision was made without touching the orifice. This study aimed to assess the safety and feasibility of this novel technique. METHODS: One hundred and ten patients were prospectively enrolled in this study. Patients with a papillary roof size ≥10 mm underwent opening window fistulotomy for primary biliary access. In addition, the incidence of complications and success rate of biliary cannulation were evaluated. RESULTS: The median size of the papillary roof was 6 mm (range, 3-20 mm). Opening window fistulotomy was performed in 30 patients (27.3%), none of whom displayed PEP. Duodenal perforation was recorded in one patient (3.3%), which was resolved by conservative treatment. The cannulation rate was high (96.7%, 29/30 patients). The median duration of biliary access was 8 minutes (range, 3-15 minutes). CONCLUSION: Opening window fistulotomy demonstrated its feasibility for primary biliary access by achieving great safety with no PEP complications and a high success rate for biliary cannulation.

Surgery of Simple and Complex Anal Fistulae in Adults: A Review of the Literature for Optimal Surgical Outcomes.

Anal fistulas are common anorectal conditions, and surgery is the primary treatment option. In the last 20 years of literature, there exist a large number of surgical procedures, especially for the treatment of complex anal fistulas, as they present more recurrences and continence problems than simple anal fistulas. To date, there are no guidelines for choosing the best technique. We conducted a recent literature review, mainly the last 20 years, based on the PubMed and Google Scholar medical databases, with the goal of identifying the surgical procedures with the highest success rates, lowest recurrence rates, and best safety profiles. Clinical trials, retrospective studies, review articles, comparative studies, recent systematic reviews, and meta-analyses for various surgical techniques, as well as the latest guidelines of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland, and the German S3 guidelines on simple and complex fistulas were reviewed. According to the literature, there is no recommendation for the optimal surgical technique. The etiology, complexity, and many other factors affect the outcome. In simple intersphincteric anal fistulas, fistulotomy is the procedure of choice. In simple low transsphincteric fistulas, the patient's selection is crucial in order to perform a safe fistulotomy or another sphincter-saving technique. The healing rate in simple anal fistulas is higher than 95% with low recurrence and without significant postoperative complications. In complex anal fistulas, only sphincter-saving techniques should be used; the optimal outcomes are obtained by the ligation of the intersphincteric fistulous tract (LIFT) and rectal advancement flaps. Those techniques assure high healing rates of 60-90%. The novel technique of the transanal opening of the intersphincteric space (TROPIS) is under evaluation. The novel sphincter-saving techniques of fistula laser closure (FiLac) and video-assisted anal fistula treatment (VAAFT) are safe, with reported healing rates ranging from 65% to 90%. Surgeons should be familiar with all sphincter-saving techniques in order to face the variability of the fistulas-in-ano. Currently, there is no universally superior technique that can treat all fistulas.

Would Surgeons Like to Be Submitted to Anal Fistulotomy? An International Web-Based Survey.

Traditional fistulotomy is the most performed surgical procedure in anal fistula surgery. We conducted an international online survey to explore colorectal surgeons' opinions and preferences on fistulotomy. Considering the healing and continence impairment rates reported in the literature, surgeons were invited to answer as a hypothetic patient susceptible to being submitted to fistulotomy for low and high anal fistula. A total of 767 surgeons completed the survey from 72 countries. The majority of respondents were consultants, having treated more than 20 anal fistulas in the last year. Most of them declared that anal fistula would be able to negatively affect quality of life and would be worried/anxious about it. Taking into account all aspects, 87.5% and 37.8% of respondents would agree to be treated with a fistulotomy in case of a low and high fistula, respectively, with an acceptance rate that varied worldwide. At multivariate analysis, factors correlated to the acceptance of anal fistulotomy were male gender (p = 0.003), practice of less than 20 fistula operations during last year (p = 0.020), and low fistula (p < 0.001). Surgeons recognized the extreme complexity of this approach. This study highlighted the necessity of an accurate patients' selection and the adoption of alternative strategy to reduce the risk of anal continence impairment.

Clinical benefit of early precut sphincintroterotomy for difficult biliary cannulation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

OBJECTIVES: A precut procedure is sometimes required for difficult biliary cannulation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). However, it is unclear whether the biliary access rate has improved for early precut procedures compared to conventional techniques. This study aimed to identify the benefit of early precut sphincterotomy in cases showing difficult biliary access. METHODS: Between April 2017 and August 2021, consecutive patients who underwent precutting for difficult biliary cannulation were retrospectively enrolled. The outcomes of early (≤ 10 min from start of cannulation) and delayed (> 10 min) precut groups were evaluated. All adverse events were defined according to Cotton criteria. RESULTS: A total of 70 patients were enrolled in this study. The biliary cannulation rate for a first ERCP was significantly higher in the early compared to delayed precut group (95% vs. 73.3%; P = 0.015). A difference in overall cannulation rate between the two groups was not observed (97.5% vs. 83.3%; P > 0.05). Significantly higher rates of prophylactic pancreatic stents were described in the delayed compared to early precut group (36.7% vs. 12.5%; P = 0.009). Significant differences in the frequency of pancreatitis, bleeding, penetration, and perforation were not noted between the two groups. Overall, the success rate was statistically significant between the experienced and less experienced endoscopists (87.2% vs. 63.9%; P = 0.017). CONCLUSIONS: Early precutting within 10 min from the start of cannulation in ERCP is safe and effective in cases with a difficult biliary cannulation, and can improve the biliary cannulation rate.

Fistulotomy versus Fistulectomy for Fistula-in-Ano: A Randomized Prospective Study.

Background Fistula-in-ano is common surgical ailment yet challenging to treat. Current management remains majorly dependent on two conventional surgical options (fistulotomy and fistulectomy), surgeon's preference, and their experience. Methods This prospective, randomized study was conducted to compare fistulotomy with fistulectomy in the management of patients with simple fistula-in-ano. Fifty patients were recruited and randomized into two groups each containing 25 patients: group I was managed by fistulotomy and group II was managed by fistulectomy. The outcomes of the study include operating time, postsurgery hospital stay, wound healing time, postoperative pain, and postoperative complications. Results Of the 50 patients, 11 (22%) were female and 39 (78%) were male with a mean age of 40.62 ± 12.86 years. The operating time in patients in the fistulotomy group was 21.96 ± 1.90 minutes and in the fistulectomy group was 31.32 ± 2.99 minutes ( p ≤ 0.001). The mean postsurgical hospital stay in the fistulotomy group was 1.32 ± 0.47 days and in the fistulectomy group was 2.32 ± 0.69 days ( p ≤ 0.001), respectively. Mean Visual Analog Scale score was higher in fistulectomy when compared with the fistulotomy at 6 hours and at discharge ( p ≤ 0.05). Postoperative complications were also found to be less in fistulotomy patients compared with patients who underwent fistulectomy. Conclusion In comparison to a fistulectomy, fistulotomy has a slight edge in terms of operating time, postsurgery hospital stay, wound healing time, postoperative pain, and postoperative complications. Fistulotomy yielded better results than fistulectomy and we recommend fistulotomy procedure as a treatment of choice in patients with simple low lying fistula-in-ano.

Non-Locatable Internal Opening in Anal Fistula Associated with Acute Abscess and Its Definitive Management by Garg Protocol.

Background: Definitive management of acute fistula-abscess (anal fistulas associated with acute abscess) is gaining popularity against the two-staged approach (early abscess drainage with deferred fistula management). However, locating an internal opening (IO) in acute fistula-abscess can be difficult. A recent protocol (Garg protocol) has been shown to be effective in managing anal fistulas with non-locatable IO. Purpose: To test the efficacy of the Garg protocol in managing acute fistula-abscess with non-locatable IO. Methods: Patients with acute fistula-abscess operated by a definitive procedure were included. A preoperative MRI was done in all patients. Patients in whom the IO was non-locatable after clinical, MRI, and intraoperative examination were managed by the three-step Garg protocol. Garg protocol: 1) Reassessment of MRI; 2) In non-horseshoe fistulas, the IO was assumed to be at the point where the fistula tract reached closest to the sphincter-complex; 3) In horseshoe fistulas, the IO was assumed to be located in the midline (anterior or posterior as per the horseshoe location). Low fistulas were treated by fistulotomy and high fistulas by a sphincter-sparing procedure. The long-term healing rate and change in continence (Vaizey scores) were evaluated. Results: A total of 201 patients with acute fistula-abscess were operated over six years, and 19 were lost to follow-up. A total of 182 patients (154-males) were followed up (median-37 months). The IO was locatable in 133/182 (73.1%) (control group) and was non-locatable in 49/182 (26.9%) (study group). The study group was managed as per the Garg protocol. The age, sex-ratio, and fistula parameters were comparable in both groups. The long-term healing rate was 112/133(84.2%) in the IO-locatable group and 43/49 (87.8%) in the IO-non-locatable group (p=0.64, not-significant). The objective continence scores did not change significantly after surgery in both groups. Conclusion: Acute fistula-abscess with non-locatable IO can be managed successfully by the Garg protocol without any risk of incontinence.

Interventional inflammatory bowel disease: endoscopic therapy of complications of Crohn's disease.

Endoscopic therapy for inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) or IBD surgery-associated complications or namely interventional IBD has become the main treatment modality for Crohn's disease, bridging medical and surgical treatments. Currently, the main applications of interventional IBD are (i) strictures; (ii) fistulas and abscesses; (iii) bleeding lesions, bezoars, foreign bodies, and polyps; (iv) post-operative complications such as acute and chronic anastomotic leaks; and (v) colitis-associated neoplasia. The endoscopic treatment modalities include balloon dilation, stricturotomy, strictureplasty, fistulotomy, incision and drainage (of fistula and abscess), sinusotomy, septectomy, banding ligation, clipping, polypectomy, endoscopic mucosal resection, and endoscopic submucosal dissection. The field of interventional IBD is evolving with a better understanding of the underlying disease process, advances in endoscopic technology, and interest and proper training of next-generation IBD interventionalists.

Comparison between recent sphincter-sparing procedures for complex anal fistulas-ligation of intersphincteric tract vs transanal opening of intersphincteric space.

Complex anal fistulas are difficult to treat. The main reasons for this are a higher recurrence rate and the risk of disrupting the continence mechanism because of sphincter involvement. Due to this, several sphincter-sparing procedures have been developed in the last two decades. Though moderately successful in simple fistulas (50%-75% healing rate), the healing rates in complex fistulas for most of these procedures has been dismal. Only two procedures, ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract and transanal opening of intersphincteric space have been shown to have good success rates in complex fistulas (60%-95%). Both of these procedures preserve continence while achieving high success rates. In this opinion review, I shall outline the history, compare the pros and cons, indications and contraindications and future application of both these procedures for the management of complex anal fistulas.

Incision and Drainage With Primary Fistulotomy of Perianal Abscess Is Safe and Effective in Neonates: A Long-Term Follow-Up Study.

Objective: Perianal abscess (PA) in neonates is poorly understood, and its management remains controversial. The aim of this study was to compare incision and drainage (ID) with or without primary fistulotomy in the management of neonatal first-time PA. Methods: A retrospective comparative study was conducted for neonates with first-time PA treated with incision and drainage with primary fistulotomy (IDF) vs. ID between 2008 and 2017. Results: In total, 138 patients (137 boys and 1 girl) were identified; 65 in the IDF group and 73 in the ID group. The median follow-up was 6.5 years (range 4-13 years). Baseline characteristics were similar between the 2 groups. The cure rate in the IDF group (98.5%, 64/65) was significantly higher than that in the ID group (80.8%, 59/73; p = 0.001). The rate of fistula formation in the IDF group (1.5%, 1/65) was significantly lower than that in the ID group (13.7%, 10/73; p = 0.01). The rate of abscess recurrence was not statistically different (p = 0.12), even though the IDF group (0%, 0/65) seemed to have a better outcome than the ID group (5.5%, 4/73). No fecal incontinence was observed in any of our patients. Conclusions: First-time PA in neonates can be treated safely and effectively by the IDF or by ID alone. The former may be advantageous over the latter in terms of the rate of cure and fistula formation.