Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Publication year range
1.
Iran Endod J ; 5(3): 117-20, 2010.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23130036

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Adequate root canal seal following retreatment is essential for a successful outcome. Resilon/Epiphany (R/E) obturation system has been introduced as a substitute for conventional gutta-percha/sealer method. This in vitro study compared the amount of apical microleakage of R/E with gutta-percha/AH26 (GP/AH26) sealer as secondary root canal filling following retreatment in human teeth. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty human single-rooted lower premolar teeth were selected. After preparing them with ProTaper rotary NiTi instruments, all the canals were obturated using GP/AH26 sealer. After 10 days, all the samples were retreated using the same rotary NiTi instruments. The samples were divided randomly into two experimental groups A and B (n=20) and positive and negative control groups (n=5). In group A, all canals were obturated using GP/AH26 sealer and in group B all canals were obturated using R/E. After one week incubation in 37˚C with 100% humidity, the amount of apical microleakage was evaluated with fluid filtration model. All the apical microleakage data were analyzed with Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS: The mean amounts of apical microleakage were 0.317 ± 0.287 and 0.307 ± 0.281 µL/8min (fluid pressure=30 cm H2O) in experimental group A and B respectively; the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: R/E seems to be a good alternative for retreatment as a secondary root canal filling material. However, Resilon/Epiphany obturation system does not completely avert microleakage.

2.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM (Western Pacific) | ID: wpr-405698

ABSTRACT

This article was to study the micro-leakage of 3 different root canal sealers (Endomethasone, AH-Plus and GuttaFlow) by fluid filtration test, and to observe the micro-structure between walls of root canal and the sealers by SEM. The results indicated that the micro-leakage of GuttaFlow was the least and Endomethasone was the most. Statistics difference were found between all the groups. Different root canal sealer got different micro-structure between walls of root canal and sealers. So we consider that the canal sealing ability of GuttaFlow is the best among these sealers.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...