GLP1R (glucagon-like-peptide-1 incretin receptor), diabetes and obesity phenotypes: An in silico approach revealed new pathogenic variants.

OBJECTIVE: Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor belongs to the B family of G protein-coupled receptors, serving as a binding protein in membranes and is widely expressed in human tissues. Upon stimulation by its agonist, the glucagon-like peptide-1, the receptor plays a role in glucose metabolism, enhancing insulin secretion, and regulating appetite in the hypothalamus. Mutations in the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor gene can lead to physiological changes that may explain phenotypic variations in individuals with obesity and diabetes. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate missense variants of the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor gene. METHODS: Data mining was performed on the single nucleotide polymorphism database, retrieving a total of 16,399 variants. Among them, 356 were missense. These 356 variants were analyzed using the PolyPhen-2 and filtered based on allele frequency, resulting in 6 pathogenic variants. RESULTS: D344E, A239T, R310Q, R227H, R421P, and R176G were analyzed using four different prediction tools. The D344E and A239T resulted in larger amino acid residues compared to their wild-type counterparts. The D344E showed a slightly destabilized structure, while A239T affected the transmembrane helices. Conversely, the R310Q, R227H, R421P, and R176G resulted in smaller amino acid residues than the wild-type, leading to a loss of positive charge and increased hydrophobicity. Particularly, the R421P, due to the presence of proline, significantly destabilized the α-helix structure and caused severe damage to the receptor. CONCLUSION: Elucidating the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor variants and their potentially detrimental effects on receptor functionality can contribute to an understanding of metabolic diseases and the response to available pharmacological treatments.

Body weight loss and glycemic control on the outcomes of patients with NAFLD. The role of new antidiabetic agents.

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is currently the most common cause of chronic liver disease worldwide affecting a third of adults and 12% of children in Western countries. In around 50-60%% of cases, NAFLD and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) coexist and act synergistically to increase the risk of adverse hepatic and extra-hepatic outcomes. T2DM is a strong risk factor for rapid progression of NAFLD to nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), cirrhosis or hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), which have become frequent indications of liver transplantation. The pathophysiology of NAFLD is complex and its relationship with T2DM is bidirectional, where lipotoxicity and insulin resistance (IR), act as the strongest pillars. To date, no pharmacological treatment has been approved for NAFLD. However, there is an intense research with numerous drugs focused on reversing inflammation and liver fibrosis through modulation of molecular targets without good results. It has been known for some time that weight reduction >10% is associated to histological improvement of NAFLD. Recently, glycemic control has been shown to induce similar results. Diet and physical exercise for weight reduction have limitations, so alternative methods (pharmacologic, endoscopic or surgical) may be required. Currently, new antidiabetic drugs inducing weight loss, have been recently approved for the treatment of obesity. Nevertheless, their therapeutic effects on NAFLD have not been extensively studied. We will review here, recently published data on the effects of weight loss and glycemic control on the histological and metabolic parameters of NAFLD and recent published data on therapeutic studies of NAFLD with new antidiabetic drugs.

PPARα and PPARß/δ are negatively correlated with proinflammatory markers in leukocytes of an obese pediatric population.

BACKGROUND: Obesity configures a pathophysiological profile that predisposes the development of metabolic and cardiovascular diseases, critically impacting public health. The chronic dysregulation of immuno-metabolic components triggered by pediatric obesity is a common but scarcely understood aspect of the disease. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) are a group of transcription factors essential for energy and immune homeostasis of different tissues. Besides, the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R) activation influences insulin secretion, but also regulates the cytokine profile possibly mediated through a PPAR isotype. However, the role of PPARs and GLP-1R in leukocytes from obese pediatric patients remains unclear. Therefore, we examined the expression of PPARs isotypes and GLP-1R in leukocytes, and its correlation with metabolic, hormonal, inflammatory, and anthropometric markers in an obese pediatric population. RESULTS: Obese children and adolescents presented a significant increase in anthropometric and body composition parameters, TG, VLDL, TG/HDL, android fat (%)/gynoid fat (%) (A/G%) index, and HOMA score when compared with the control group. Obese participants exhibited a pro-inflammatory profile with an augment of IL-8 (p = 0,0081), IL-6 (p = 0,0005), TNF-α (p = 0,0004), IFN-γ (p = 0,0110), MCP-1 (p = 0,0452), and adipsin (p = 0,0397), whereas displayed a reduction of adiponectin (p = 0,0452). The expression of PPARα and GLP-1R was lower in the leukocytes from obese participants than in lean subjects. Furthermore, PPARα correlates negatively with TNF-α (p = 0,0383), while GLP-1R did not show correlation with any inflammatory variable. However, both receptors correlate negatively with the abdominal skinfold. Although PPARß/δ expression was similar between groups, it was negatively associated with IL-8 levels (p = 0,0085). CONCLUSIONS: PPARα and PPARß/δ expression are negatively correlated with the proinflammatory markers TNF-α and IL-8, respectively, suggesting participation in the regulation of inflammation which was observed to be altered in pediatric obesity. Furthermore, PPARα and GLP-1R are downregulated in leukocytes from obese participants. The low expression of both receptors is correlated with an increase in abdominal skinfold, suggesting a role in fat distribution that could indirectly affect cytokine secretion from different immune and adipose cells, likely triggering an inflammatory profile as a consequence of obesity. Altogether, these findings may impact the understanding and implementation of PPARα or GLP-1R agonists in the clinic.