Niños hospitalizados con influenza en un hospital pediátrico de Argentina durante 2019-2022: ¿qué ha cambiado luego de la pandemia por COVID-19? / Children with influenza admitted at a children's hospital in Argentina in the 2019­2022 period: What has changed after the COVID-19 pandemic?

Introducción. Durante 2020 y 2021, la circulación de los virus influenza se mantuvo por debajo de lo esperado en todo el mundo. En Argentina, en el año 2022 observamos una circulación ininterrumpida de influenza todo el año. Nuestros objetivos fueron describir los patrones de circulación y las características clínicas de niños internados con influenza. Población y métodos. Estudio retrospectivo, analítico, observacional. Se incluyeron todos los niños internados en un centro pediátrico con detección del virus influenza durante los años 2019-2022. Resultados. Se internaron 138 pacientes en 4 años; en 2019 se observó una tasa del 4,5/1000 egresos hospitalarios mientras que en 2022, fue del 15,1/1000. En 2020 y 2021 no hubo casos. En el 2019 la mayoría de los casos ocurrieron en invierno, la causa de la internación fue la infección respiratoria aguda baja (IRAB) en el 79 % y se detectó influenza A en el 92 % de los casos. En el 2022, la mayoría de los casos ocurrieron en primavera, el 62 % presentó IRAB y en el 56 % se detectó influenza A. Ambos períodos tuvieron similares frecuencias de vacunación y de comorbilidades. Conclusiones. En el 2022 se registraron más internaciones por influenza, lo que podría corresponder a que se realizaron métodos diagnósticos moleculares, que son más sensibles, y se observó un cambio en la estacionalidad con más casos en primavera. En 2019 predominó influenza A en infecciones del tracto respiratorio inferior, mientras que en el 2022 influenza A y B fueron similares, y hubo más formas extrapulmonares.

Introduction. During 2020 and 2021, the circulation of influenza virus remained below expectations worldwide. In Argentina, in 2022, we observed an uninterrupted circulation of influenza all year round. Our objectives were to describe the circulation patterns and clinical characteristics of hospitalized children with influenza. Population and methods. Retrospective, analytical, observational study. All children with influenza virus admitted to a children's hospital during the 2019­2022 period were included. Results. A total of 138 patients were admitted over 4 years; in 2019, the rate of hospital discharges was 4.5/1000, compared to 15.1/1000 in 2022. No cases were recorded in 2020 and 2021. In 2019, most cases were observed in the winter; in 79%, the cause was acute lower respiratory tract infection (ALRTI); influenza A was detected in 92%. In 2022, most cases occurred in the spring; 62% developed ALRTI; and influenza A was detected in 56%. Similar rates of vaccination and comorbidities were observed in both periods. Conclusions. In 2022, more hospitalizations due to influenza were recorded, which may have correlated with the use of more sensitive molecular diagnostic testing and a change in seasonality, with more cases observed in the spring. In 2019, influenza A predominated in lower respiratory tract infections, while in 2022, cases of influenza A and B were similar, with more extra-pulmonary forms.

Vaccination against seasonal flu in childhood and adolescence. Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Vaccines and Immunizations of the Spanish Association of Pediatrics (CAV-AEP) for the 2024-2025 season.

The flu is a constant threat that can sometimes cause severe forms of disease. The highest incidence rates by age group occur in children under 15 years of age, especially in those under 5 years, in whom the rate of hospitalization is also similar to the population aged 65 years and older. In addition, children are the main transmitters of the infection. In Spain, 5 influenza vaccines are authorized for the paediatric age group: three inactivated tetravalent vaccines harvested from fertilised eggs, one tetravalent inactivated vaccine obtained from cell cultures and one attenuated tetravalent vaccine for intranasal administration, which will become trivalent in the 2024-2025 season by excluding the B Yamagata lineage as recommended by the WHO. The CAV-AEP recommends systematic vaccination in children aged 6-59 months, children and adolescents belonging to risk groups, people who can transmit the flu to groups at risk of complicated flu, and household contacts or close family of infants under 6 months. From 2 years of age, the intranasal attenuated vaccine is preferred due to its greater acceptability and thus contribution to greater vaccination coverage. The CAV-AEP also considers that vaccination against influenza of healthy children and adolescents aged 5-18 years is advisable, as it provides individual protection and promotes protection at the family and community levels. It is especially important to vaccinate all health care professionals against influenza as well as pregnant women at any time during pregnancy.

Vaccination in pregnancy. Consensus document of the CAV-AEP and the SEGO.

During pregnancy, physiological changes in the immune response make pregnant women more susceptible to serious infection, increasing the risk for the mother as well as the foetus, newborn and infant. All women should be correctly and fully vaccinated as they enter their reproductive years, especially against diseases such as tetanus, hepatitis B, measles, rubella and varicella. In addition to the recommended vaccines, in risk situations, inactivated vaccines could be administered to women who were not correctly vaccinated before, while attenuated vaccines are contraindicated. Despite the fact that vaccination during pregnancy is a very important preventive measure and the existing recommendations from public health authorities, scientific societies and health professionals, the vaccination coverage could clearly be improved, especially against influenza and SARS-CoV-2, so any health professional involved in the care of pregnant women should proactively recommend these vaccines. The Spanish Association of Pediatrics (AEP), through its Advisory Committee on Vaccines, and the Spanish Society of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (SEGO) recommend vaccination against the following diseases during pregnancy: against influenza and COVID-19, in any trimester of pregnancy and during the postpartum period (up to 6 months post birth) in women not vaccinated during pregnancy; against pertussis, with the Tdap vaccine, between weeks 27 and 36 of gestation (in the CAV-AEP recommendations, preferably between weeks 27 and 28); and against RSV, with RSVPreF, between weeks 24 and 36 of gestation, preferably between weeks 32 and 36.

Vacunación en el embarazo. Documento de consenso del CAV-AEP y la SEGO / Vaccination in pregnancy. Consensus document of the CAV-AEP and the SEGO

Durante el embarazo, los cambios fisiológicos en la respuesta inmunitaria favorecen que las gestantes sean más susceptibles a infecciones graves, tanto para ellas como para el feto, el recién nacido y el lactante. Todas las mujeres deberían entrar en el período reproductivo con su calendario vacunal correctamente cumplimentado, sobre todo en lo que respecta a enfermedades como tétanos, hepatitisB, sarampión, rubeola y varicela. Además de las vacunas recomendadas, en situaciones de riesgo las vacunas inactivadas podrían ser administradas en aquellas mujeres que no estuvieran correctamente inmunizadas con anterioridad, mientras que las atenuadas están contraindicadas.A pesar de que la vacunación durante el embarazo es una medida preventiva muy importante, y de las recomendaciones de autoridades sanitarias, sociedades científicas y profesionales sanitarios, las coberturas vacunales son claramente mejorables, especialmente en lo que respecta a gripe y COVID-19, por lo que todo profesional sanitario que atienda a la embarazada debe ser proactivo en aconsejarlas.La Asociación Española de Pediatría (AEP), a través de su Comité Asesor de Vacunas (CAV), y la Sociedad Española de Ginecología y Obstetricia (SEGO) recomiendan las siguientes vacunaciones durante la gestación: frente a gripe y COVID-19, en cualquier trimestre del embarazo, y durante el puerperio (hasta los 6meses) en aquellas que no hubieran sido vacunadas durante la gestación; frente a tosferina con Tdpa, entre las 27 y 36 semanas de gestación (el CAV-AEP da preferencia entre las 27 y 28 semanas); y frente al VRS con RSVPreF, entre las 24 y 36 semanas de gestación, de preferencia entre las 32 y 36 semanas. (AU)

During pregnancy, physiological changes in the immune response make pregnant women more susceptible to serious infection, increasing the risk for the mother as well as the foetus, newborn and infant. All women should be correctly and fully vaccinated as they enter their reproductive years, especially against diseases such as tetanus, hepatitisB, measles, rubella and varicella. In addition to the recommended vaccines, in risk situations, inactivated vaccines could be administered to women who were not correctly vaccinated before, while attenuated vaccines are contraindicated.Despite the fact that vaccination during pregnancy is a very important preventive measure and the existing recommendations from public health authorities, scientific societies and health professionals, the vaccination coverage could clearly be improved, especially against influenza and SARS-CoV-2, so any health professional involved in the care of pregnant women should proactively recommend these vaccines.The Spanish Association of Pediatrics (AEP), through its Advisory Committee on Vaccines (CAV), and the Spanish Society of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (SEGO) recommend vaccination against the following diseases during pregnancy: against influenza and COVID-19, in any trimester of pregnancy and during the postpartum period (up to 6months post birth) in women not vaccinated during pregnancy; against pertussis, with the Tdap vaccine, between weeks 27 and 36 of gestation (in the CAV-AEP recommendations, preferably between weeks 27 and 28); and against RSV, with RSVPreF, between weeks 24 and 36 of gestation, preferably between weeks 32 and 36. (AU)

Diagnóstico por amplificación isotérmica de ácidos nucleicos. Oportunidad para la farmacia comunitaria / Diagnosis by isothermal amplification of nucleic acids. Opportunity for community pharmacy

Esta revisión se centra en describir nuevos sistemas de diagnóstico molecular de tipo POC disponibles en el mercado que pueden implementarse fácilmente en farmacias comunitarias y tienen el potencial de ampliar la cartera de servicios farmacéuticos y hacer una contribución significativa a la mejora de la salud pública.El conocimiento de nuevas técnicas de diagnóstico molecular distintas de la PCR es relativamente desconocido. Sin embargo, las opciones disponibles son diversas y han alcanzado suficiente madurez tecnológica para su uso a gran escala. La pandemia de SARS-CoV-2 ha sacado al mercado pruebas de diagnóstico que, en algunos casos, se han utilizado exclusivamente en investigación durante décadas.La tecnología isotérmica de amplificación de ácidos nucleicos sigue evolucionando y es probable que en los próximos años seamos testigos de un aumento exponencial de su uso, así como del desarrollo de nuevas mejoras que simplifiquen y reduzcan aún más el coste de cada ensayo.Igualmente, no podemos obviar el hecho de que durante la pandemia de COVID-19, el público se ha habituado a autodiagnosticarse a través de canales de distribución masiva como las farmacias comunitarias, lo que puede abrir el sector a otras enfermedades —como las de transmisión sexual o salud animal—, el control de alimentos, la contaminación del agua y del aire (hongos) o la presencia de alérgenos.El conocimiento de estas nuevas tecnologías es esencial estrategia de vigilancia tecnológica e inteligencia competitiva del sector farmacéutico.(AU)

Importancia de los Centros Nacionales de Gripe en la vigilancia de virus aviares de alta patogenicidad. El momento para One-Healthes ahora / Importance of National Influenza Centers in the surveillance of highly pathogenic avian viruses. The time for One-Health is now

Desde el año 1996 el subtipo de gripe aviar de alta patogenicidad A(H5N1) ha estado casi de forma ininterrumpida causando brotes en aves salvajes y domésticas, además de casos en seres humanos con una mortalidad cercana al 50%. Sin embargo, los años de mayor circulación han sido precisamente los años posteriores a la pandemia de COVID-19, en los que se han registrado diversos casos en humanos en lugares donde nunca antes habían aparecido, además de múltiples casos en mamíferos salvajes, domésticos y peri domésticos, que entrañan cierta preocupación por el riesgo que puede suponer para el salto del virus al ser humano través de cadenas de transmisión de mayor o menor extensión. El brote actual de A(H5N1) nos muestra que el concepto One-Health debe estar más vivo que nunca para aunar esfuerzos entre profesionales de diferentes sectores de la sanidad humana, animal y medio ambiental para evitar o minimizar estos riesgos, de tal forma que los laboratorios de referencia como los Centros Nacionales de Gripe dispongan de los medios humanos y materiales para ofrecerinformación rápida y relevante en el menor tiempo posible antes emergencias de este tipo. Las herramientas de diagnóstico y seguimiento que se deben utilizar en estos casos deben estar disponibles para cualquier eventualidad, y llegar más allá de los datos básicos debe ser una premisa indispensable para poder hacer un seguimiento pormenorizado que sirva para acotar brotes, limitar la difusión de la enfermedad, y ayudar al diseño de futuras vacunas pandémicas frente a virus aviares. (AU)

Since 1996, the highly pathogenic avian influenza subtype A(H5N1) has been causing almost uninterrupted outbreaks in wild and domestic birds, as well as cases in humans with a mortality rate close to 50%. However, the years of greatest circulation have been precisely the years following the COVID-19 pandemic, in which several cases have been recorded in humans in places where they had never appeared before, in addition to multiple cases in wild, domestic and peri-domestic mammals, which raise some concern about the risk that the virus may jump to humans through chains of transmission of greater or lesser extent. The current outbreak of A(H5N1) shows us that the One-Health concept should be more alive than ever to join efforts between professionals from different sectors of human, animal and environmental health to avoid or minimize these risks, so that reference laboratories such as the National Influenza Centers have the human and material resources to provide rapid and relevant information in the shortest possible time before emergencies of this type. The diagnostic and monitoring tools to be used in these cases must be available for any eventuality, and going beyond the basic data must be an indispensable premise to be able to carry out a detailed monitoring that serves to limit outbreaks, limit the spread of the disease, and help in the design of future pandemic vaccines against avian viruses. (AU)

Efectividad de la vacuna antigripal para prevenir casos graves de gripe. Temporada 2022/2023 / Effectiveness of influenza vaccine in preventing severe cases of influenza: Season 2022/2023

Introducción: La gripe supone una importante carga en términos de morbimortalidad, siendo la vacunación una de las medidas más efectivas para su prevención. Por lo que el objetivo de este estudio es conocer la efectividad de la vacuna antigripal para prevenir casos de gripe grave en los pacientes ingresados en un hospital de tercer nivel durante la temporada 2022/23. Metodología: Estudio de casos y controles. Se incluyeron todos los pacientes hospitalizados con resultado positivo en una RT-PCR de gripe. Se consideró caso a aquellos que cumplieron criterio de caso grave (neumonía, sepsis, fallo multiorgánico, ingreso en la UCI o exitus). Quienes no los cumplían se consideraron controles. Se calculó la efectividad vacunal (EV) para prevenir los casos graves y su intervalo de confianza al 95%. Resultados: Un total de 403 pacientes ingresaron con gripe confirmada. Noventa y ocho (24,3%) de ellos desarrollaron gripe grave. Del total, el 50,6% fueron varones y el 47,1% fueron mayores de 65 años. La EV ajustada por tipo de gripe, edad y ciertas comorbilidades fue del 40,6% (−21,9-71,1). En un análisis segmentado, la vacuna de la gripe resultó efectiva para la prevención de los casos graves en todas las categorías. Resultó especialmente relevante en el grupo de 65 años o más (EVa=60,9%; −2,0-85,0) y en los pacientes con gripe A (EVa=56,7%; 1,5-80,9). Conclusiones: La vacunación antigripal redujo notablemente la aparición de casos graves de gripe en los pacientes hospitalizados, por tanto, sigue siendo la principal estrategia para reducir la morbimortalidad y los costes asociados.(AU)

Introduction: Influenza poses a significant burden in terms of morbidity and mortality, with vaccination being one of the most effective measures for its prevention. Therefore, the aim of this study is to determine the effectiveness of the influenza vaccine in preventing cases of severe influenza in patients admitted to a tertiary hospital during the 2022/23 season. Methods: Case-control study. All hospitalised patients with a positive result in an RT-PCR for influenza were included. Those who met the criteria for a severe case (pneumonia, sepsis, multi-organ failure, admission to ICU or exitus) were considered cases. Those who did not meet these criteria were considered controls. Vaccine effectiveness (VE) to prevent severe cases and its 95% confidence interval were calculated. Results: A total of 403 patients were admitted with confirmed influenza. Of these, 98 (24.3%) developed severe influenza. Of the total, 50.6% were men and 47.1% were over 65 years of age. VE adjusted for influenza type, age and certain comorbidities was 40.6% (−21.9 to 71.1). In a segmented analysis, influenza vaccine was effective in preventing severe cases in all categories. It was particularly relevant in the 65+ age group (VEa=60.9%; −2.0 to 85.0) and in patients with influenza A (VEa=56.7%; 1.580.9). Conclusion: Influenza vaccination markedly reduced the occurrence of severe cases of influenza in hospitalised patients, therefore, it remains the main strategy to reduce morbidity and mortality and associated costs.(AU)

Effectiveness of influenza vaccine in preventing severe cases of influenza: Season 2022/2023.

INTRODUCTION: Influenza poses a significant burden in terms of morbidity and mortality, with vaccination being one of the most effective measures for its prevention. Therefore, the aim of this study is to determine the effectiveness of the influenza vaccine in preventing cases of severe influenza in patients admitted to a tertiary hospital during the 2022/23 season. METHODS: Case-control study. All hospitalised patients with a positive result in an RT-PCR for influenza were included. Those who met the criteria for a severe case (pneumonia, sepsis, multi-organ failure, admission to ICU or exitus) were considered cases. Those who did not meet these criteria were considered controls. Vaccine effectiveness (VE) to prevent severe cases and its 95% confidence interval were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 403 patients were admitted with confirmed influenza. Of these, 98 (24.3%) developed severe influenza. Of the total, 50.6% were men and 47.1% were over 65 years of age. VE adjusted for influenza type, age and certain comorbidities was 40.6% (-21.9 to 71.1). In a segmented analysis, influenza vaccine was effective in preventing severe cases in all categories. It was particularly relevant in the 65+ age group (VEa = 60.9%; -2.0 to 85.0) and in patients with influenza A (VEa = 56.7%; 1.5-80.9). CONCLUSION: Influenza vaccination markedly reduced the occurrence of severe cases of influenza in hospitalised patients, therefore, it remains the main strategy to reduce morbidity and mortality and associated costs.

COVID -19: On the threshold of the fifth year. The situation in Spain / COVID-19: A las puertas del quinto año

Despite having emerged from pandemic status, the incidence of COVID-19 episodes has recently increased in Spain, including pediatric cases and admissions to Intensive Care Units. Several recombinant variants are circulating among us, particularly XBB arising from two Omicron BA.2 sublineages with mutations in the genes encoding the spicule proteins that could increase binding to the ACE2 receptor and be more prone to immune escape. Faced with these, 3 pharmaceutical companies have developed vaccines adapted to the XBB.1.5 sublineage that are already available for administration in our setting with risks that should not be different from those of previous mRNA vaccines and with clearly favorable benefit/risk ratios. They should be applied to patients with potential for poor COVID-19 evolution and to collectives that have a particular relationship of proximity with them. Their application should be understood not only from a perspective of individual convenience but also from that of collective responsibility. The most convenient seems to be a simultaneous immunization of COVID-19 and influenza in our environment. In the therapeutic aspect, there is little to expect right now from antisera, but the already known antiviral drugs are still available and indicated, although their efficacy will have to be reevaluated due to their impact on populations that are mostly immunized and with a better prognosis than in the past. In our opinion, it is necessary to continue to make a reasonable and timely use of masks and other non-pharmacological means of protection. (AU)

Pese a haber salido de la situación de pandemia, la incidencia de episodios de COVID-19 ha aumentado recientemente en España, incluidos los casos pediátricos y los ingresos en Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos. Circulan entre nosotros diversas variantes recombinantes, particularmente la XBB surgidas de dos sublinajes Omicron BA.2 con mutaciones en los genes que codifican las proteínas de la espícula y que pudieran aumentar la unión al receptor ACE2 y ser más propensas al escape inmune. Frente a ellas, 3 empresas farmacéuticas han elaborado vacunas adaptadas al sublinaje XBB.1.5 que ya se encuentran disponibles para su administración en nuestro medio con riesgos que no deben ser diferentes a los de las vacunas mRNA previas y con relaciones beneficio/riesgos claramente favorables. Deben aplicarse a pacientes con potencial de mala evolución de COVID-19 y a los colectivos que tienen una particular relación de proximidad con ellos. Su aplicación debe ser entendida no sólo desde una perspectiva de conveniencia individual sino desde la de la responsabilidad colectiva. Lo más conveniente parece hacer una inmunización simultánea de COVID-19 y gripe en nuestro medio. En el aspecto terapéutico hay poco que esperar ahora mismo de los antisueros pero siguen estando disponibles e indicados los fármacos antivirales ya conocidos aunque su eficacia tendrá que reevaluarse por su impacto en poblaciones mayoritariamente inmunizadas y con pronóstico mejor que las de tiempos pasados. A nuestro juicio, es necesario seguir haciendo un uso razonable y puntual de mascarillas y otros medios no farmacológicos de protección. (AU)

Eficacia y seguridad de la vacunación antigripal pediátrica: una revisión sistemática / Efficacy and safety of pediatric flu vaccination: a systematic review

Introducción. Los a corren un mayor riesgo de infección por influenza en comparación con la población general. La Organización Mundial la Salud y las recomendaciones del Comité Asesor de Vacunas de la Asociación Española de Pediatría contemplan la vacunación anual como la forma más eficaz de prevenir la enfermedad. Por lo tanto, el propósito de esta revisión fue actualizar la información sobre eficacia y seguridad en la vacuna antigripal en niños y adolescentes. Material y métodos. Una búsqueda en cuatro bases de datos electrónicas (Scopus, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, MedLine / PubMed, Google Scholar y Cochrane), así como una búsqueda manual para identificar investigaciones originales publicadas entre 2012 y 2022. Se adoptaron las directrices de análisis (PRISMAcR) como elemento de informe preferido para revisiones sistemáticas. Resultados. Se incluyeron siete artículos de investigación originales donde se identificaron dos temas de la vacunación antigripal en niños/adolescentes sanos y con patologías. La eficacia (entre un 30% y un 80% aproximadamente) varió en función de la vacuna utilizada y los subtipos circulantes. La mayoría de las reacciones adversas fueron de intensidad leve y el evento adverso local más común informado fue dolor en el sitio de la inyección. Conclusiones. Destacamos positivamente la seguridad de la vacunación antigripal pediátrica en los estudios analizados, por el contrario, con respecto a la eficacia de la vacunación antigripal, observamos una amplia variabilidad de resultados. Existe una clara necesidad de seguir realizando estudios de eficacia y seguridad en el niño. (AU)

Introduction. Children are at a higher risk of influenza infection compared to the general population. The World Organization Health and recommendations of the Vaccine Advisory Committee of the Spanish Association of Pediatrics contemplate annual vaccination as the most effective way to prevent the disease. Therefore, the purpose of this review was to update information on efficacy and safety in the anti -shed vaccine in children and adolescents. Material and methods. A search in four electronic databases (Scopus, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Medline / Pubmed, Google Scholar and Cochrane), as well as a manual search to identify original research published between 2012 and 2022. The guidelines of ANALYSIS (PRISMACR) as a preferred report element for systematic reviews. Results. Seven original research articles were included where two issues of antigripal vaccination were identified in healthy children/adolescents and with pathologies. The efficacy (between approximately 30% and 80%) varied depending on the vaccine used and circulating subtypes. Most adverse reactions were mild intensity, and the most common local adverse event was pain in the injection site. Conclusions. We positively highlight the safety of pediatric flu vaccination in analyzed studies, on the contrary, with respect to the efficacy of flu vaccination, we observe a wide variability of results. There is a clear need to continue conducting efficacy and safety studies in the child. (AU)

Respiratory syncytial virus infection in adults: Differences with influenza.

INTRODUCTION: Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) causes an acute respiratory illness similar to influenza, although there are few data comparing both of them in adults. The existence of clinical differences between these two infections could have implications for their management. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective observational cohort study including 63 adults with positive PCR for RSV and 221 for influenza during winter 2018-2019. Epidemiological, clinical characteristics and outcomes were contrasted between both groups. RESULTS: Compared to influenza, RSV-positive patients presented a higher association with active neoplasia (OR=2.9; 95% CI: 1.2-6.9), dependence for basic activities of daily living (OR=3.4; 95% CI: 1.4-8.2) and immunosuppression due to chronic glucocorticoid administration (OR=7.6; 95% CI: 1.6-36.1). At diagnosis, fever was less common (OR=0.3; 95% CI: 0.2-0.7), and C-reactive protein level ≥100mg/l was more frequent (OR=2.1; 95% CI: 1.0-4.5). They developed bacterial co-infection by Staphylococcus aureus in a higher proportion (OR=8.3; 95% CI: 1.5-46.9) and presented a greater need for admission to the intensive care unit (OR=5.4; 95% CI: 1.4-19.2). CONCLUSION: RSV is an important cause of respiratory illness in adults during the influenza season. It especially affects vulnerable patients with chronic underlying diseases, and has a higher morbidity than influenza. For all these reasons, specific detection, prevention and treatment of RSV is necessary in order to reduce the consumption of health care resources due to RSV disease in adults.

"Valha-nos a Providência!": festas e ritos católicos em tempos epidêmicos, Salvador-BA, Brasil, 1918-1919 / "God for us!": Catholic festivals and rites in times of epidemics, Salvador-BA, Brasil, 1918-1919

Resumo O artigo analisa as reações dos católicos vinculados às associações leigas na cidade do Salvador, no período da gripe espanhola (1918) e da varíola (1919). Os jornais foram as principais fontes utilizadas para a identificação das festas e dos ritos, tanto dos praticados para pedir a intercessão dos santos quanto daqueles que foram suspensos em função da necessidade de isolamento social. Apesar de ambas as doenças serem transmissíveis e do curto espaço de tempo entre as duas epidemias, a análise das fontes evidenciou diferentes reações dos fiéis quanto às medidas de proteção e busca da cura.

Abstract This article analyzes the reactions of Catholics linked to lay associations in the city of Salvador, in the period of the Spanish flu (1918) and smallpox (1919). Newspapers were the main sources used to identify the festivals and rites, both those practiced to ask for the intercession of the saints, and those that were suspended due to the need for social isolation. In spite of both diseases being transmissible and the short interval between the two epidemics, the analysis of the sources showed different reactions from the faithful regarding the measures of protection and the search for a cure.

A gripe em Portugal. O caso da gripe russa (1889-1890) / The influenza in Portugal. The case of russian flu (1889-1890)

Este trabalho trata da gripe em Portugal, dando particular destaque à gripe russa. Não será abordada a “gripe espanhola”, dada a profusão de estudos já publicados nos últimos anos sobre esta pandemia. O nosso objetivo consiste em mostrar a antiguidade da doença em Portugal, bem como a sua recorrência ao longo dos séculos, incluindo na contemporaneidade, quando a gripe alcançou maior incidência. Os periódicos e as publicações médicas são a principal base do nosso trabalho, que pretende ser um contributo para o estudo de uma doença que não tem merecido a atenção que, decerto, é devida, designadamente da parte da História.(AU)

This work deals with influenza in Portugal, with particular emphasis on the Russian flu. The Spanish flu will not be addressed, given the profusion of studies already published in recent years on this pandemic. Our objective is to show the antiquity of the disease in Portugal, as well as its recurrence over the centuries, including in contemporary times, when the flu reached a higher incidence. Medical journals and publications are the main basis of our work, which aims to be a contribution to the study of a disease Grathat has not received the attention it certainly deserves, namely from the part of History.(AU)

[Adaptation and validation of the MoVac-flu scale on motivation towards the flu vaccine]. / Adaptación y validación de la escala MoVac-flu sobre motivación hacia la vacuna de la gripe.

OBJECTIVE: To translate, adapt and validate the psychometric properties of MoVac-flu scale in order to be used in Spanish. METHOD: The present research was an analytical observational study of cross-cultural adaptation and validation into Spanish of the MoVac-flu scale. It has been carried out between the months of March and July 2022. The sample size was 142 people who were obtained by consecutive sampling. The processes used for the adaptation have been translation, validation by a committee of experts, back-translation and pilot test. For validation, the psychometric properties of reliability, internal consistency, appearance validity, content validity, utility and ceiling-floor effect have been verified. RESULTS: The internal consistency of the MoVac-flu scale in its version translated into Spanish was high, showing a McDonald's ω of 0.914. CONCLUSIONS: The MoVac-flu scale in Spanish allows to measure the degree of motivation towards vaccination against influenza in the adult population.

Glomerulonefritis aguda posinfecciosa asociada al virus de la gripe B y enterovirus / Postinfectious acute glomerulonephritis associated to influenza B virus and enterovirus

La glomerulonefritis aguda posinfecciosa (GNAPI) es una lesión inflamatoria con afectación principal del glomérulo generada por una infección extrarrenal. Su patogenia es inmune, desencadenada por gran variedad de gérmenes: bacterias, virus y hongos. La causa más frecuente es la glomerulonefritis posestreptocócica (GNAPE). El caso que presentamos fue causado por gripe B y enterovirus, agentes etiológicos de presentación poco frecuente, con manifestación clínica similar a una glomerulonefritis posestreptocócica. Concluimos que, ante una clínica de síndrome nefrítico, se deben tener en cuenta los antecedentes víricos, para hacer un diagnóstico precoz (AU)

Acute post-infectious glomerulonephritis (APIGN) is an inflammatory lesion with main involvement of the glomerulus triggered by an extrarenal infection. Its pathogenesis is immune, triggered by a wide variety of germs: bacteria, viruses and fungi. The most common cause is poststreptococcal glomerulonephritis (PSAGN). The case that we present was associated to influenza B and enterovirus, etiological agents of infrequent presentation, with clinical manifestations similar to post-streptococcal glomerulonephritis. We conclude that, when faced with a nephritic syndrome clinic, the viral history should be taken into account to make an early diagnosis. (AU)

Nuevos y viejos aspectos de la gripe / Old and new aspects of influenza

La gripe es una enfermedad infecciosa clásica que, a través de la continua variación que experimentan los virus que la producen, nos impone nuevos retos que debemos solventar con la mayor celeridad posible. La pandemia de COVID-19 ha modificado sustancialmente el comportamiento de la gripe y de otros virus respiratorios, y en los próximos años tendremos que convivir con un nuevo patógeno que probablemente interactuará con los existentes bajo un prisma que de momento no alcanzamos a vislumbrar. Sin embargo, los conocimientos previos a la pandemia nos permiten focalizar en los aspectos que se deben modificar para que la gripe sea un reto asumible a futuro. En esta revisión se hace hincapié en los aspectos más relevantes de la epidemiología, la carga de enfermedad, el diagnóstico y la prevención mediante vacunas, y cómo fluyen las tendencias científicas y clínicas en dichos aspectos desde lo anteriormente conocido a los retos futuros (AU)

Influenza is a classic infectious disease that, through the continuous variation of the viruses that produce it, imposes new challenges that we must solve as quickly as possible. The COVID-19 pandemic has substantially modified the behavior of influenza and other respiratory viruses, and in the coming years we will have to coexist with a new pathogen that will probably interact with existing pathogens in a way that we cannot yet glimpse. However, knowledge prior to the pandemic allows us to focus on the aspects that must be modified to make influenza an acceptable challenge for the future. In this review, emphasis is placed on the most relevant aspects of epidemiology, disease burden, diagnosis, and vaccine prevention, and how scientific and clinical trends in these aspects flow from the previously known to future challenges (AU)

Impacto y características de la gripe nosocomial a lo largo de 10 temporadas en un hospital universitario de tercer nivel / Impact and characteristics of hospital-acquired influenza over 10 seasons in a third-level university hospital

Objetivos: Analizar las características de los pacientes con gripe nosocomial, compararlas con las de los enfermos con diagnóstico de gripe comunitaria para estudiar posibles diferencias e identificar posibles factores de riesgo asociados a este tipo de gripe. Pacientes y métodos: Estudio observacional, transversal y retrospectivo de los pacientes hospitalizados con diagnóstico microbiológico de gripe en un hospital universitario de tercer nivel durante 10 temporadas, de 2009 a 2019. Se definió como gripe nosocomial aquella infección cuyos síntomas comenzaron 72 h después del ingreso hospitalario y se analizó su incidencia, características y consecuencias. Resultados: Se incluyó a un total de 1.260 pacientes hospitalizados con diagnóstico microbiológico de gripe, de los cuales 110 (8,7%) fueron nosocomiales. Los pacientes con gripe adquirida en el hospital eran más jóvenes (71,74±16,03 años; p=0,044), tuvieron una estancia hospitalaria mayor (24,25±20,25 días; p<0,001), tenían con mayor frecuencia antecedentes de enfermedades pulmonares crónicas (p=0,010), inmunodeficiencias (p<0,001) y se asociaron con mayor desarrollo de sobreinfección bacteriana (p<0,001), distrés respiratorio (p=0,003) e ingreso en la unidad de cuidados intensivos (UCI) (p<0,001). En el análisis por regresión logística multivariante se identificaron como factores de riesgo independientes: inmunodeficiencia (ORa=2,33; IC 95%: 1,47-3,60); ingreso en UCI (ORa=4,29; IC 95%: 2,23-10,91); desarrollo de sobreinfección bacteriana (ORa=1,64; IC 95%: 1,06-2,53) y de distrés respiratorio (ORa=3,88; IC 95%: 1,23-12,23).Conclusiones: La gripe nosocomial es más frecuente en los pacientes con antecedentes de inmunodeficiencia. Además, los enfermos con gripe hospitalaria tienen un riesgo aumentado de sobreinfección bacteriana, ingreso en UCI y desarrollo de distrés respiratorio.(AU)

Objectives: To analyze the characteristics of patients with nosocomial flu, to compare them with patients with community-acquired influenza to study possible differences and to identify possible risk factors associated with this type of flu. Patients and methodsObservational, cross-sectional and retrospective study of hospitalized patients with a microbiological confirmation of influenza in a third-level university hospital over 10seasons, from 2009 to 2019. Nosocomial influenza was defined as that infection whose symptoms began 72h after hospital admission, and its incidence, characteristics and consequences were further analyzed. Results: A total of 1260 hospitalized patients with a microbiological diagnosis of influenza were included, which 110 (8.7%) were nosocomial. Patients with hospital-acquired influenza were younger (71.74±16.03 years, P=0.044), had a longer hospital stay (24.25±20.25 days, P<0.001), had more frequently a history of chronic pulmonary pathologies (P=0.010), immunodeficiency (P<0.001), and were associated with greater development of bacterial superinfection (P<0.001), respiratory distress (P=0.003), and admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) (P<0.001). In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, the following characteristics were identified as independent risk factors: immunodeficiency (ORa=2.33; 95% CI: 1.47-3.60); ICU admission (ORa=4.29; 95% CI: 2.23-10.91); bacterial superinfection (ORa=1.64; 95% CI: 1.06-2.53) and respiratory distress (ORa=3.88; 95% CI: 1.23-12.23). Conclusions: Nosocomial influenza is more common in patients with a history of immunodeficiency. In addition, patients with hospital-acquired influenza had an increased risk of bacterial superinfection, admission to the ICU, and development of respiratory distress.(AU)

Efficacy and effectiveness of influenza vaccination in healthy children. A review of current evidence / Eficacia y efectividad de la vacunación frente a la gripe en niños sanos. Una revisión de la evidencia actual

Influenza is common in healthy children and adolescents and is associated with a high rate of hospitalization in this group, especially for those <5 years. Although the WHO has recommended vaccination in children under 5 years of age since 2012, it is really implemented in few countries today. The aim of this paper was to review the available evidence on the efficacy/effectiveness of influenza vaccination in healthy children <18 years of age through a non-systematic search of studies conducted between 2010 and 2020. Despite the high variability in results due to differences in design, vaccine type and season included in the 41 selected studies, statistically significant studies show efficacy values for the influenza vaccine of between 25.6% and 74.2%, and effectiveness from 26% to 78.8%. Although a systematic review would be necessary to corroborate the evidence, this review suggests that paediatric vaccination is generally an effective measure for preventing influenza in healthy children in line with international organisms’ recommendations.(AU)

La gripe tiene una elevada incidencia en niños y adolescentes sanos, y se asocia a una alta tasa de hospitalización, especialmente en los < 5 años. Desde 2012, la Organización Mundial de la Salud recomienda la vacunación en < 5 años, pero pocos países aplican hoy esta recomendación. El objetivo de este documento es revisar la evidencia disponible sobre la eficacia/efectividad de la vacunación antigripal en niños sanos < 18 años mediante una búsqueda no sistemática de estudios entre 2010-2020. A pesar de la gran variabilidad en los resultados debido a las diferencias de diseño, tipo de vacuna y temporada incluidos en los 41 estudios seleccionados, aquellos con significación estadística muestran valores de eficacia para la vacuna antigripal del 25,6% y al 74,2%, y de efectividad del 26% al 78,8%. Aunque sería necesaria una revisión sistemática para corroborar la evidencia, esta revisión sugiere que la vacunación pediátrica es globalmente una medida eficaz/efectiva para prevenir la gripe en niños sanos, en línea con las recomendaciones de organismos internacionales.(AU)

Acontecimientos adversos en embarazadas con la vacuna tetravalente contra la gripe obtenida de cultivos celulares / Adverse events in pregnant women with the tetravalent influenza vaccine obtained from cell cultures

La vacunación de la gripe en embarazadas muestra una clara relación beneficio/riesgo. En la actualidad se están desarrollando vacunas contra la gripe utilizando nuevas plataformas. Es imprescindible analizar la seguridad de estas nuevas vacunas en este grupo poblacional, infrarrepresentado en los ensayos clínicos. En la temporada 2019-2020 se aconsejó una vacuna obtenida en cultivo celular a las embarazadas en 2comunidades autónomas. Se recogió información de los centros de vacunación y de farmacovigilancia de ambas comunidades. La tasa de notificación de casos de acontecimientos adversos tras la vacunación en embarazadas fue de 4,02/100.000 dosis administradas y, en mujeres de 18 a 64 años no embarazadas, de 5,9/100.000 dosis administradas. La tasa de acontecimientos adversos notificados fue de 8,04 y 17,74, respectivamente. No se notificaron abortos espontáneos, prematuridad ni malformaciones fetales. Este análisis señala la seguridad en embarazadas de la vacuna de la gripe obtenida de cultivos celulares.(AU)

Influenza vaccination in pregnant women shows a clear benefit/risk ratio. Influenza vaccines are currently being developed using new platforms. It is essential to analyze the safety of these new vaccines in this population group, underrepresented in clinical trials. In the 2019-2020 season, a vaccine obtained in cell culture was recommended to pregnant women in 2autonomous communities. Information is collected from the vaccination and pharmacovigilance centers of both communities. The reporting rate of adverse events after vaccination in pregnant women was 4.02/100,000 doses administered, and in non-pregnant women aged 18-64 years it was 5.9/100,000 doses administered. The rate of adverse events reported was 8.04 and 17.74, respectively. No spontaneous abortions, prematurity or fetal malformations were reported. This analysis suggests the safety in pregnant women of the influenza vaccine obtained from cell cultures.(AU)

Vaccination trends in people with HIV infection participanting in the hospital-based survey of patients infected with HIV, 2006-2021.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the trend in hepatitis A, hepatitis B, pneumococcal, tetanus and seasonal influenza vaccination in people with HIV infection and to analyse associated factors. METHODS: The Hospital Survey of Patients with HIV, an annual cross-sectional study conducted on a fixed day (2006-2021), was used. Inpatients and outpatients were included. Trends in vaccination and associated factors were analysed using logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 8643 participants were included. Vaccination rates increased to 65.3% for hepatitis A, 83.7% for hepatitis B, 49.3% for tetanus, 68.9% for pneumococcal and 74.5% for seasonal influenza in 2021. Factors positively associated with vaccination were older age for pneumococcal and influenza vaccination; higher educational level for hepatitis A and tetanus; living in a closed institutions or prison for tetanus, pneumococcal and influenza; and having acquired HIV through sex between men for hepatitis A, B and pneumococcal. In addition, being on antiretroviral treatment and having a high CD4 count were positively associated with vaccination for all these diseases. Factors inversely associated with vaccination were being older (hepatitis A, B and tetanus), being an immigrant (tetanus and seasonal influenza) and being an injection drug user/ex-user for hepatitis A and B. CONCLUSIONS: Vaccination in people with HIV has increased in the study period. The results are in line with the recommendations in this population, although there is still room to reach the established vaccination indicators.