Effect of Thalamic versus Pallidal Deep Brain Stimulation on Head Tremor in Dystonic and Essential Tremor Patients-A Retrospective Video-Blinded Study.

BACKGROUND: Head tremor is common in dystonia syndromes and difficult to treat. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a therapeutic option in medically-refractory cases. In most DBS-centers, the globus pallidus internus (GPi) is targeted in patients with predominant dystonia and the ventrointermediate nucleus of the thalamus (Vim) in predominant tremor. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of GPi- versus Vim-DBS in dystonic or essential head tremor. METHODS: All patients with dystonia or essential tremor (ET) (n = 381) who underwent DBS surgery at our institution between 1999 and 2020 were screened for head tremor in our database according to predefined selection criteria. Of the 33 patients meeting inclusion criteria tremor and dystonia severity were assessed at baseline, short- (mean 10 months) and long-term follow-up (41 months) by two blinded video-raters. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients with dystonic head tremor received either GPi- (n = 12) or Vim-stimulation (n = 10), according to the prevailing clinical phenotype. These two groups were compared with 11 patients with ET, treated with Vim-stimulation. The reduction in head tremor from baseline to short- and long-term follow-up was 60-70% and did not differ significantly between the three groups. CONCLUSIONS: GPi-DBS effectively and sustainably reduced head tremor in idiopathic dystonia. The effect was comparable to the effect of Vim-DBS on head tremor in dystonia patients with predominant limb tremor and to the effect of Vim-DBS on head tremor in ET.

Idiopathic and structural episodic nonintentional head tremor in dogs: 100 cases (2004-2022).

BACKGROUND: Although idiopathic episodic head tremor (IEHT) in dogs is well-known, little is known about structural brain lesions causing structural episodic head tremor (SEHT). HYPOTHESIS/OBJECTIVES: Describe semiology, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings and outcome of dogs with IEHT or SEHT. We hypothesized that structural lesions affecting the middle cranial fossa or mesencephalic aqueduct could lead to SEHT. ANIMALS: One hundred dogs with IEHT (n = 71) or SEHT (n = 29). METHODS: Retrospective, multicenter, study of dogs with episodic (nonintentional) head tremor and brain MRI between 2004 and 2022. RESULTS: Lesions on MRI in SEHT dogs were localized to the middle cranial fossa (15/29), cerebrocortex (3/29), brainstem (2/29), fourth ventricle (1/29) or multifocal (8/29) with thalamus involvement (6/8). Secondary compression of the mesencephalic aqueduct (19/29), third ventricle or interthalamic adhesion or both (14/29) was common. The most common underlying condition in dogs with SEHT was a pituitary mass. Dogs with SEHT were older, had additional neurological signs and were more likely to be euthanized after diagnosis (P < .001 for all) compared to IEHT dogs. Two SEHT dogs had only tremor. In IEHT dogs, 8/10 owners reported that the tremor decreased or abated over time (range, 106-2315 days) without treatment. Tremor remission occurred in SEHT dogs treated for underlying meningoencephalitis. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Presence of additional neurological signs and older age may indicate an underlying structural cause for episodic (nonintentional) head tremor involving the mesencephalic aqueduct, third ventricle, interthalamic adhesion or some combination of these. An intracranial structural abnormality cannot be excluded in dogs with normal neurological examination.

Essential and dystonic head tremor: More similarities than differences.

INTRODUCTION: Head tremor is a common symptom of essential tremor (ET) and cervical dystonia (CD). In clinical practice, it is often difficult to distinguish between these two conditions, especially in cases where head tremor predominates. OBJECTIVES: To investigate which clinical and instrumental methods best differentiate ET and CD in patients with head tremor. METHODS: 65 patients were included, of which 23 were diagnosed with ET and head tremor (HT+), 21 with ET without head tremor (HT-) and 21 with CD and dystonic head tremor. 22 healthy volunteers served as controls. All patients were examined using the rating scales for ET (TETRAS), cervical dystonia (TWSTRS), and ataxia (SARA). The Somatosensory Temporal Discrimination Threshold (STDT) was defined as the shortest interval in which an individual recognizes two tactile stimuli as temporally separated. RESULTS: TETRAS and SARA scores were higher in the HT+ group compared with HT- and CD, with no significant difference between mild head tremor subscores in HT+ and CD. In most HT+ and CD patients, head tremor disappeared supine. The STDT values were significantly higher in the HT+ group compared with controls. CONCLUSION: While TWSTRS contributed to assess dystonia severity, the scales of tremor and ataxia were not helpful in differentiating head tremor syndromes. The cessation of head tremor in the supine position could be related to the overall mild head tremor scores in both groups. Increased SARA scores and STDT values in HT+ patients suggest a possible role of cerebellar involvement and altered somatosensory timing that merit further verification.

French validation of the Quality of life in Essential Tremor Questionnaire (QUEST) and the Essential Tremor Embarrassment Assessment (ETEA).

Two scales have been developed and validated in English to evaluate the impact of tremor on daily life, namely Quality of life in Essential Tremor Questionnaire (QUEST) and Essential Tremor Embarrassment Assessment (ETEA). The psychometric properties of the French version of these two scales were assessed for 117 patients with head tremor. Both scales showed excellent acceptability, very good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha coefficient>0.8) and reproducibility (Lin concordance coefficient>0.8), satisfactory external validity and satisfactory sensitivity to change. In conclusion, the French versions of QUEST and ETEA are comprehensive, valid and reliable instruments for assessing patients with head tremor.

Very-Low-Frequency Spike-Wave Complex Partial Motor Seizure Mimicking Canine Idiopathic Head Tremor Syndrome in a Dog.

Canine idiopathic head tremor syndrome (CIHTS) represents a benign condition characterized by episodic, uncontrolled movement of the head. Even though the condition might be an expression of a partial motor epilepsy, to date, there is a limited number of studies describing the electroencephalographic features. In this report, we describe the case of a dog diagnosed with partial motor epilepsy resembling CIHTS symptomatology, a new slow spike-wave complex pattern similar to that of Lennox-Gastaut syndrome in humans identified on electroencephalographic examination. We also studied the efficacy of phenobarbitone therapy over a period of two years.

Exploring the heterogeneous morphometric data in essential tremor with probabilistic modelling.

Essential tremor (ET) is a prevalent movement disorder characterized by marked clinical heterogeneity. Here, we explored the morphometric underpinnings of this cross-subject variability on a cohort of 34 patients with right-dominant drug-resistant ET and 29 matched healthy controls (HCs). For each brain region, group-wise morphometric data was modelled by a multivariate Gaussian to account for morphometric features' (co)variance. No group differences were found in terms of mean values, highlighting the limits of more basic group comparison approaches. Variance in surface area was higher in ET in the left lingual and caudal anterior cingulate cortices, while variance in mean curvature was lower in the right superior temporal cortex and pars triangularis, left supramarginal gyrus and bilateral paracentral gyrus. Heterogeneity further extended to the right putamen, for which a mixture of two Gaussians fitted the ET data better than a single one. Partial Least Squares analysis revealed the rich clinical relevance of the ET population's heterogeneity: first, increased head tremor and longer symptoms' duration were accompanied by broadly lower cortical gyrification. Second, more severe upper limb tremor and impairments in daily life activities characterized the patients whose morphometric profiles were more atypical compared to the average ET population, irrespective of the exact nature of the alterations. Our results provide candidate morphometric substrates for two different types of clinical variability in ET. They also demonstrate the importance of relying on analytical approaches that can efficiently handle multivariate data and enable to test more sophisticated hypotheses regarding its organization.

Does Head Tremor Predict Postural Instability After Bilateral Thalamic Stimulation in Essential Tremor?

Essential tremor (ET) may present with head tremor (HT), of presumed cerebellar nature. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) targeting the ventral intermediate (Vim) nucleus of the thalamus is a highly effective therapy for medication-refractory ET. However, stimulation-related side effects may include cerebellar abnormalities, such as postural instability. This retrospective cohort study evaluated the risk of post-Vim DBS postural instability (primary outcome measure) in patients with versus without head tremor (HT vs. nHT). The primary outcome measure, namely post-DBS postural instability, was assessed in both groups using a Wilcoxon rank sum t-test. The time to postural instability was determined using Cox proportional hazards regression analysis adjusted for age and sex. Out of 30 patients analyzed during the follow up period, there was similar postural instability detected in HT (9/14, 64%) and nHT patients (11/16, 69%) at 24 months post-Vim DBS (p=0.82), adjusted hazard ratio[aHR]=0.82, p=0.69). These data suggest that the presence or absence of HT does not have an impact on postural instability after bilateral Vim DBS in patients with ET.

Non-motor features of essential tremor with midline distribution.

BACKGROUND: Midline essential tremor (Mid-ET) is a distinctive group of essential tremor (ET) in which tremor affects the neck, jaw, tongue, and/or voice. For long, it has been considered as an ultimate stage of the disease and a marker of its severity. However, recent studies pointed its complexity in terms of non-motor presentation. Thus, we aimed to investigate the non-motor signs (NMS) in Mid-ET. DESIGN: We conducted a cross-sectional study in a tertiary neurology referral center including ET patients classified into two groups based on the presence or not of midline tremor (Mid-ET vs. No-Mid-ET). We assessed NMS using the non-motor severity scale (NMSS), a large battery of cognitive tests, clinical and electrophysiological study of the autonomic nervous system along with the evaluation of sleep disturbances. RESULTS: A total of 163 patients were included: Mid-ET (n = 79) and No-Mid-ET (n = 84) matched in gender and age of onset. Mid-ET patients had higher proportion of late-onset ET (> 60 years old, p = 0.002) and more extrapyramidal signs (p = 0.005). For NMS, Mid-ET was marked with cognitive dysfunction (p = 0.008). The hallmarks of the neuropsychiatric profile of Mid-ET were executive dysfunction (p = 0.004), attention problems (p < 0.000), episodic memory impairment (p = 0.003), and greater depression (p = 0.010). The presence of RBD was a trait of Mid-ET (p = 0.039). In both Mid-ET and No-Mid-ET phenotypes, clinical and neurophysiological dysautonomia correlated with cognitive dysfunction. CONCLUSION: Mid-ET patients had greater cognitive dysfunction, depression, RBD, higher proportion of late-onset ET, and more extrapyramidal signs. Taken all together, these findings could provide a redesigned insight into the underlying physiopathology of Mid-ET indicative of a greater cerebellar dysfunction.

Is essential tremor a family of diseases or a syndrome? A family of diseases.

It is now well-established that essential tremor (ET) can manifest with different clinical presentations and progressions (i.e., upper limb tremor, head tremor, voice tremor, lower limb tremor, task- or position-specific tremor, or a combination of those). Common traits and overlaps are identifiable across these different subtypes of ET, including a slow rate of progression, a response to alcohol and a positive family history. At the same time, each of these manifestations are associated with specific demographic, clinical and treatment-response characteristics suggesting a family of diseases rather than a spectrum of a syndrome. Here we summarize the most important clinical, demographic, neuropathological and imagingfeatures of ET and of its subtypes to support ET as a family of identifiable conditions. This classification has relevance for counseling of patients with regard to disease progression and treatment response, as well as for the design of therapeutic clinical trials.

Quantification of Head Tremors in Medical Conditions: A Comparison of Analyses Using a 2D Video Camera and a 3D Wireless Inertial Motion Unit.

This study compares two methods to quantify the amplitude and frequency of head movements in patients with head tremor: one based on video-based motion analysis, and the other using a miniature wireless inertial magnetic motion unit (IMMU). Concomitant with the clinical assessment of head tremor severity, head linear displacements in the frontal plane and head angular displacements in three dimensions were obtained simultaneously in forty-nine patients using one video camera and an IMMU in three experimental conditions while sitting (at rest, counting backward, and with arms extended). Head tremor amplitude was quantified along/around each axis, and head tremor frequency was analyzed in the frequency and time-frequency domains. Correlation analysis investigated the association between the clinical severity of head tremor and head linear and angular displacements. Our results showed better sensitivity of the IMMU compared to a 2D video camera to detect changes of tremor amplitude according to examination conditions, and better agreement with clinical measures. The frequency of head tremor calculated from video data in the frequency domain was higher than that obtained using time-frequency analysis and those calculated from the IMMU data. This study provides strong experimental evidence in favor of using an IMMU to quantify the amplitude and time-frequency oscillatory features of head tremor, especially in medical conditions.

Head tremor in cervical dystonia: Quantifying severity with computer vision.

BACKGROUND: Head tremor (HT) is a common feature of cervical dystonia (CD), usually quantified by subjective observation. Technological developments offer alternatives for measuring HT severity that are objective and amenable to automation. OBJECTIVES: Our objectives were to develop CMOR (Computational Motor Objective Rater; a computer vision-based software system) to quantify oscillatory and directional aspects of HT from video recordings during a clinical examination and to test its convergent validity with clinical rating scales. METHODS: For 93 participants with isolated CD and HT enrolled by the Dystonia Coalition, we analyzed video recordings from an examination segment in which participants were instructed to let their head drift to its most comfortable dystonic position. We evaluated peak power, frequency, and directional dominance, and used Spearman's correlation to measure the agreement between CMOR and clinical ratings. RESULTS: Power averaged 0.90 (SD 1.80) deg2/Hz, and peak frequency 1.95 (SD 0.94) Hz. The dominant HT axis was pitch (antero/retrocollis) for 50%, roll (laterocollis) for 6%, and yaw (torticollis) for 44% of participants. One-sided t-tests showed substantial contributions from the secondary (t = 18.17, p < 0.0001) and tertiary (t = 12.89, p < 0.0001) HT axes. CMOR's HT severity measure positively correlated with the HT item on the Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale-2 (Spearman's rho = 0.54, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate a new objective method to measure HT severity that requires only conventional video recordings, quantifies the complexities of HT in CD, and exhibits convergent validity with clinical severity ratings.

Longitudinal evaluation of patients with isolated head tremor.

INTRODUCTION: Isolated head tremor, a pathological condition characterized by head tremor without dystonic postures or tremor in other body parts, has recently been suggested to be a form of dystonia. It is however still unclear whether isolated head tremor precedes dystonia or remains unmodified overtime. METHODS: We enrolled 20 patients with isolated head tremor. For each patient, we assessed videos recorded at enrollment and after 5 years. The videotapes were reviewed by two independent experienced movement disorder specialists who evaluated and scored tremor and CD severity using the Fahn-Tolosa-Marin Clinical Rating Scale for Tremor and the revised Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS), respectively. RESULTS: Upon enrollment, all 20 patients showed isolated head tremor. Mean tremor severity was 2.7 ± 0.9 as measured using the Fahn-Tolosa-Marin Clinical Rating Scale for Tremor total score. At the 5-year follow-up examination, 15 (75%) of the 20 patients with isolated head tremor showed dystonic postures in the neck, while the remaining 5 patients (25%) had only isolated head tremor. Mean severity of dystonia as measured using the TWSTRS-2 total score was 11.8 ± 3.6. Head tremor severity was unchanged between baseline and the 5-year follow-up examination (p > 0.05). At the follow-up examination, no patients had tremor or dystonia in a body part other than the neck, nor did they develop bradykinesia or other parkinsonian signs. CONCLUSIONS: Our longitudinal study demonstrated that patients with isolated head tremor may develop cervical dystonia over time.

From null to midline: changes in head posture do not predictably change head tremor in cervical dystonia.

Introduction: A common view is that head tremor (HT) in cervical dystonia (CD) decreases when the head assumes an unopposed dystonic posture and increases when the head is held at midline. However, this has not been examined with objective measures in a large, multicenter cohort. Methods: For 80 participants with CD and HT, we analyzed videos from examination segments in which participants were instructed to 1) let their head drift to its most comfortable position (null point) and then 2) hold their head straight at midline. We used our previously developed Computational Motor Objective Rater (CMOR) to quantify changes in severity, amplitude, and frequency between the two postures. Results: Although up to 9% of participants had exacerbated HT in midline, across the whole cohort, paired t-tests reveal no significant changes in overall severity (t = -0.23, p = 0.81), amplitude (t = -0.80, p = 0.43), and frequency (t = 1.48, p = 0.14) between the two postures. Conclusions: When instructed to first let their head drift to its null point and then to hold their head straight at midline, most patient's changes in HT were below the thresholds one would expect from the sensitivity of clinical rating scales. Counter to common clinical impression, CMOR objectively showed that HT does not consistently increase at midline posture in comparison to the null posture.

Does Raising the Arms Modify Head Tremor Severity in Cervical Dystonia?

Background: A defining characteristic of dystonia is its position-dependence. In cervical dystonia (CD), sensory tricks ameliorate head tremor (HT). But it remains unknown whether raising the arms alone has the same impact. Methods: We analyzed data collected from patients enrolled by the Dystonia Coalition. For 120 patients with HT, we assessed how raising their arms without touching their head changed their HT severity. Results: Forty-eight out of 120 patients exhibited changes in HT severity when raising their arms. These patients were more likely to exhibit decreases in HT severity (N = 35) than increases (N = 13, χ2 (1, N = 48) = 10.1, p = 0.002). Demographic factors and sensory trick efficacy were not significant predictors of whether HT severity changed when raising their arms. Discussion: Raising the arms without touching the head is a posture that can reduce HT severity in some CD patients. Our results extend the concept of position-dependent motor symptoms in CD to include the position of the arms. Highlights: Head tremor (HT) is a prevalent symptom of cervical dystonia (CD) that can often be disabling. This study demonstrates that raising the arms without touching the head is a posture that can reduce HT severity in some CD patients. Our findings also identify a novel form of position-dependence in CD.

Response to "isolated head tremor: A DAT SPECT and somatosensory temporal discrimination study."

In response to Ferrazano and colleagues' observation of normal DAT binding in patients with isolated head tremor but with abnormal STDT, we report normal 123-IBZM SPECT in a cohort of patients with adult-onset idiopathic focal dystonia with cervical dystonia and their unaffected first-degree relatives both with normal and abnormal TDTs. We discuss molecular imaging findings in dystonia.

Evolving resting head tremor in parkinsonism: Clinicopathological study of a case.

INTRODUCTION: Resting limb tremor (RLT) is a well known feature in parkinsonism. There is very little information on resting head tremor (RHT) in parkinsonism, and none in pathologically confirmed cases. The association between RLT and RHT remains uncertain. METHODS: A Caucasian male developed upper limb tremor and voice changes at age 70. He was first assessed at our clinic at age 72. At age 73 he developed resting head tremor (RHT) which prevented him from falling asleep. His status was documented in longitudinal follow-up at our clinic. He had a total of 14 clinical evaluations and four videos made over 6 years. Autopsy of the brain and spinal cord was performed. RESULTS: The resting head tremor improved on antiparkinsonian drugs and resolved completely after four years. Coincident with RHT remission, the upper limb tremor worsened and interfered with feeding, and his lower limb resting tremor became more pronounced. During his course he developed slow, scanning speech and all the cardinal motor findings of parkinsonism. There was no ophthalmoplegia. Post-mortem neuropathological examination revealed prominent progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) changes and minor Lewy body pathology. CONCLUSION: This is the first autopsy confirmed case of parkinsonism with RHT. He had dual pathology. Dissociation between RHT and RLT indicates that the oscillatory brain centers for the two were different in this case.

Long-Term Successful Outcome of Dystonic Head Tremor after Bilateral Deep Brain Stimulation of the Ventral Intermediate and Ventro-Oral Internus Nuclei: A Case Report and Literature Review of Dystonic Head Tremor.

Head tremor in patients with dystonia is referred to as dystonic tremor. During surgical treatment, numerous targets may be selected, including the internal segment of the globus pallidus and the ventral intermediate (Vim) nucleus; however, there is no consensus concerning the most effective treatment target. We report herein a case of dystonic head tremor in which improvement persisted for 5 years after deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the bilateral thalamic Vim and ventro-oral internus (Voi) nuclei. The patient, a 67-year-old woman, has a horizontal head tremor associated with cervical dystonia that had been resistant to drug treatment over 3 years. Immediately following surgery, dystonia and tremor symptoms had completely improved. Voice volume declined and dysarthria occurred but improved upon adjusting the stimulation conditions. Over 5 years, both head tremor and cervical dystonia have been completely controlled, and no other obvious complications have been observed. As the Voi nucleus receives pallidothalamic projections involved in dystonia and the Vim nucleus receives cerebellothalamic projections involved in tremors, stimulating these 2 nuclei with the same electrode appears reasonable in the treatment of dystonic tremor. This case suggests that Vim-Voi DBS may be effective for treating dystonic head tremor.