Analysis of social determinants of health on emergency department utilization by gunshot wound survivors after level 1 trauma center discharge.

Background: This project analyzed risk factors for emergency department (ED) utilization without readmission within 2 weeks post-discharge for survivors of gun violence. Methods: A hundred gun violence survivors admitted to a Level 1 trauma center were surveyed. Descriptive analyses and group comparisons were conducted between patients who did and did not use the ED. Factors analyzed are rooted in social determinants of health and clinical care related to the index hospitalization. Results: Of the 100 patients, 31 had an ED visit within 6 weeks, although most (87.1%) returned within 2 weeks of discharge. Factors significantly associated (p≤0.05) with a return ED visit included: not having an identified primary care provider, not having friends or family to count on for help, not having enough money to support themselves before return to work, and not feeling able to read discharge instructions. Conclusion: Lack of a primary care provider, low health literacy and social support were associated with increased ED visits without readmission post-discharge. Level of Evidence: Level III, Prognostic and Epidemiological.

Cuidado de enfermagem à pessoa com ferida naAtenção Primária à Saúde: desafios e potências / Nursing care for people with woundsin primary health care: Challenges and strengths / Atención de enfermería a personas conheridas en atención primaria de salud: desafíos y potencias

Objetivo: descrever fatores identificados pelos enfermeiros como desafios e potências no cuidado de enfermagem à pessoa com ferida na Atenção Primária à Saúde. Método: estudo exploratório, descritivo, de abordagem qualitativa, realizado de setembro a novembro de 2022, no Distrito Sanitário Centro de Florianópolis. Utilizou-se para a coleta de dados um questionário on-line, cujos resultados foram analisados com base na análise temática do conteúdo de Bardin. Resultados: o estudo contou com a participação de 29 enfermeiros, dos quais28 (97%) relataram enfrentar desafios, assim como identificaram potências no cotidiano de cuidado à pessoa com ferida. Com base na análise dos dados, emergiram três categorias: "Categoria 1 ­ Desafios e potências relacionadas ao processo de trabalho do enfermeiro"; "Categoria 2 ­ Desafios e potências relacionadas à pessoa com ferida"; e "Categoria 3 ­ Desafios e potências relacionados à infraestrutura e recursos tecnológicos e materiais disponíveis". Conclusão: Os fatores destacados pelos enfermeiros como potências e desafios estão relacionados ao trabalho do enfermeiro, ao indivíduo com ferida e à infraestrutura e recursos tecnológicos e materiais disponíveis. Conhecer esses fatores pode suscitar a implementação de ferramentas para superação dos desafios e promoção das potências, visando fomentar a qualidade dessa prática. (AU)

Objective: We aim to describe factors identified by nurses as challenges and strengths in nursing care for people with wounds in primary health care.Method: This is an exploratory, descriptive, qualitative study conducted from September to November 2022, in the Health District Center of the city of Florianópolis, state of Santa Catarina, Brazil. We used an online questionnaire for data collection, and the results were analyzed based on thematic content analysis according to Bardin. Results: A total of 29 nurses were included in the sample, of which 28 (97%) reported facing challenges as well as identifying strengths in the daily care of individuals with wounds. Based on data analysis, three categories emerged: "Category 1 ­ Challenges and strengths related to the nurse's work process"; "Category 2 ­ Challenges and strengths related to the individual with a wound"; and "Category 3 ­ Challenges and strengths related to available infrastructure, technological resources, and materials."Conclusions: The factors highlighted by nurses as strengths and challenges are related to nursing work focused on the person with a wound and to the available infrastructure, technological resources, and materials. Knowledge of these factors can lead to the implementation of tools to overcome challenges and promote strengths, with the aim of improving the quality of this practice. (AU)

Objetivo: Pretendemos describir los factores identificados por las enfermeras como desafíos y fortalezas en la atención de enfermería para personas con heridas en la atención primaria de salud.Método: Se trata de un estudio exploratorio, descriptivo y cualitativo realizado de septiembre a noviembre de 2022, en el Distrito de Salud Centro de la ciudad de Florianópolis, estado de Santa Catarina, Brasil. Utilizamos un cuestionario en línea para la recopilación de datos, y los resultados fueron analizados según el análisis de contenido temático de Bardin. Resultados: Un total de 29 enfermeras fueron incluidas en la muestra, de las cuales 28 (97%) informaron enfrentar desafíos y también identificar fortalezas en la atención diaria de individuos con heridas. Basándonos en el análisis de datos, surgieron tres categorías: "Categoría 1 ­ Desafíos y fortalezas relacionados con el proceso de trabajo de la enfermera"; "Categoría 2 ­ Desafíos y fortalezas relacionados con el individuo con una herida"; y "Categoría 3 ­ Desafíos y fortalezas relacionados con la infraestructura disponible, recursos tecnológicos y materiales".Conclusiones: Los factores destacados por las enfermeras como fortalezas y desafíos están relacionados con el trabajo de enfermería centrado en la persona con una herida y con la infraestructura disponible, recursos tecnológicos y materiales. El conocimiento de estos factores puede llevar a la implementación de herramientas para superar desafíos y promover fortalezas, con el objetivo de mejorar la calidad de esta práctica. (AU)

Nursing care for people with woundsin primary health care: Challenges and strengths / Cuidado de enfermagem à pessoa com feridana Atenção Primária à Saúde: desafios e potências / Atención de enfermería a personas conheridas en atención primaria de salud: desafíos y potencias

Objetivo: descrever fatores identificados pelos enfermeiros como desafios e potências no cuidado de enfermagem à pessoa com ferida na Atenção Primária à Saúde. Método: estudo exploratório, descritivo, de abordagem qualitativa, realizado de setembro a novembro de 2022, no Distrito Sanitário Centro de Florianópolis. Utilizou-se para a coleta de dados um questionário on-line, cujos resultados foram analisados com base na análise temática do conteúdo de Bardin. Resultados: o estudo contou com a participação de 29 enfermeiros, dos quais28 (97%) relataram enfrentar desafios, assim como identificaram potências no cotidiano de cuidado à pessoa com ferida. Com base na análise dos dados, emergiram três categorias: "Categoria 1 ­ Desafios e potências relacionadas ao processo de trabalho do enfermeiro"; "Categoria 2 ­ Desafios e potências relacionadas à pessoa com ferida"; e "Categoria 3 ­ Desafios e potências relacionados à infraestrutura e recursos tecnológicos e materiais disponíveis". Conclusão: Os fatores destacados pelos enfermeiros como potências e desafios estão relacionados ao trabalho do enfermeiro, ao indivíduo com ferida e à infraestrutura e recursos tecnológicos e materiais disponíveis. Conhecer esses fatores pode suscitar a implementação de ferramentas para superação dos desafios e promoção das potências, visando fomentar a qualidade dessa prática. (AU)

Objective: We aim to describe factors identified by nurses as challenges and strengths in nursing care for people with wounds in primary health care.Method: This is an exploratory, descriptive, qualitative study conducted from September to November 2022, in the Health District Center of the city of Florianópolis, state of Santa Catarina, Brazil. We used an online questionnaire for data collection, and the results were analyzed based on thematic content analysis according to Bardin. Results: A total of 29 nurses were included in the sample, of which 28 (97%) reported facing challenges as well as identifying strengths in the daily care of individuals with wounds. Based on data analysis, three categories emerged: "Category 1 ­ Challenges and strengths related to the nurse's work process"; "Category 2 ­ Challenges and strengths related to the individual with a wound"; and "Category 3 ­ Challenges and strengths related to available infrastructure, technological resources, and materials."Conclusions: The factors highlighted by nurses as strengths and challenges are related to nursing work focused on the person with a wound and to the available infrastructure, technological resources, and materials. Knowledge of these factors can lead to the implementation of tools to overcome challenges and promote strengths, with the aim of improving the quality of this practice. (AU)

Objetivo: Pretendemos describir los factores identificados por las enfermeras como desafíos y fortalezas en la atención de enfermería para personas con heridas en la atención primaria de salud.Método: Se trata de un estudio exploratorio, descriptivo y cualitativo realizado de septiembre a noviembre de 2022, en el Distrito de Salud Centro de la ciudad de Florianópolis, estado de Santa Catarina, Brasil. Utilizamos un cuestionario en línea para la recopilación de datos, y los resultados fueron analizados según el análisis de contenido temático de Bardin. Resultados: Un total de 29 enfermeras fueron incluidas en la muestra, de las cuales 28 (97%) informaron enfrentar desafíos y también identificar fortalezas en la atención diaria de individuos con heridas. Basándonos en el análisis de datos, surgieron tres categorías: "Categoría 1 ­ Desafíos y fortalezas relacionados con el proceso de trabajo de la enfermera"; "Categoría 2 ­ Desafíos y fortalezas relacionados con el individuo con una herida"; y "Categoría 3 ­ Desafíos y fortalezas relacionados con la infraestructura disponible, recursos tecnológicos y materiales".Conclusiones: Los factores destacados por las enfermeras como fortalezas y desafíos están relacionados con el trabajo de enfermería centrado en la persona con una herida y con la infraestructura disponible, recursos tecnológicos y materiales. El conocimiento de estos factores puede llevar a la implementación de herramientas para superar desafíos y promover fortalezas, con el objetivo de mejorar la calidad de esta práctica. (AU)

Telematic Interview in Telepharmacy: a comprehensive guide for pharmacotherapeutic follow-up and and informed drug delivery. / [Artículo traducido] Entrevista telemática en telefarmacia: documento de consenso para el seguimiento farmacoterapéutico y la entrega informada de medicamentos.

Telepharmacy is defined as the practice of remote pharmaceutical care, using information and communication technologies. Given its growing importance in outpatient pharmaceutical care, the Spanish Society of Hospital Pharmacy developed a consensus document, Guía de entrevista telemática en atención farmacéutica, as part of its strategy for the development and expansion of telepharmacy, with key recommendations for effective pharmacotherapeutic monitoring and informed dispensing and delivery of medications through telematic interviews. The document was developed by a working group of hospital pharmacists with experience in the field. It highlights the benefits of telematic interviewing for patients, hospital pharmacy professionals, and the healthcare system as a whole, reviews the various tools for conducting telematic interviews, and provides recommendations for each phase of the interview. These recommendations cover aspects such as tool/platform selection, patient selection, obtaining authorization and consent, assessing technological skills, defining objectives and structure, scheduling appointments, reviewing medical records, and ensuring humane treatment. Telematic interview is a valuable complement to face-to-face consultations but its novelty requires a strategic and formal framework that this consensus document aims to cover. The use of appropriate communication tools and compliance with recommended procedures ensure patient safety and satisfaction. By implementing telematic interviews, healthcare institutions can improve patient care, optimize the use of resources and promote continuity of care.

Guidelines for the development and validation of patient-reported outcome measures: a scoping review.

OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this scoping review were to provide an overview of existing guidelines for the development and validation of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), review them for comprehensiveness and clarity and provide recommendations for their use based on the goals of the instrument developers. DESIGN: Scoping review. METHODS: A literature search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, PsycInfo and Google Scholar up to 2 June 2023 to identify guidelines for the development and validation of PROMs. Screening of records and reports as well as data extraction were performed by two reviewers. To assess the comprehensiveness of the included guidelines, a mapping synthesis was performed and steps to develop and validate a measurement instrument outlined in the included guidelines were mapped to an a priori framework including 20 steps, which was based on the guideline by de Vet et al. RESULTS: A total of 40 guidelines were included. Statistical advice (at least partially) was provided in 98% of the guidelines (39/40) and 88% (35/40) of the guidelines included examples for steps required to develop and validate PROMs. However, 78% (31/40) of the guidelines were not comprehensive and two essential steps in PROM development ('consideration and elaboration of the measurement model' and 'responsiveness') were not included in 80% and 72% of the guidelines, respectively. Three guidelines included all 20 steps and six included almost all steps (≥90% of steps) for developing and validating a PROM. DISCUSSION: Most guidelines on PROM development and validation do not appear to be comprehensive, and some crucial steps are missing in most guidelines. Nevertheless, for some purposes of PROMs, many guidelines provide helpful advice and support. CONCLUSION: At least 15 guidelines may be recommended, including three comprehensive guidelines that can be recommended for the development and validation of PROMs for most purposes (eg, to discriminate between subjects with a particular condition and subjects without that condition, to evaluate the effects of treatments (between a pre and post time-points) or to evaluate a status quo).

Developmental surveillance and screening practices in a pediatric oncology clinic: Initial progress of a quality improvement study.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric cancer patients' oncology teams regularly take on a primary care role, but due to the urgent nature of cancer treatment, developmental screenings may be deprioritized. This leaves patients at risk of developmental diagnoses and referrals being delayed. AIMS: Clarify the current developmental surveillance and screening practices of one pediatric oncology team. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Researchers reviewed charts for patients (n = 66) seen at a pediatric oncology clinic in a suburban academic medical center to determine engagement in developmental screening (including functioning around related areas such as speech, neurocognition, etc.) and referrals for care in these areas. RESULTS: Developmental histories were collected from all patients through admission history and physical examination (H&P), but there was no routinized follow-up. Physicians did not conduct regular developmental screening per American Academy of Pediatrics guidelines for any patients but identified n = 3 patients with needs while the psychology team routinely surveilled all patients seen during this time (n = 41) and identified n = 18 patients as having delays. DISCUSSION: Physicians did not routinely screen for development needs beyond H&P and were inconsistent in developmental follow-up/referrals. Integrated psychologists were key in generating referrals for developmental-based care. However, many oncology patients were not seen by psychologists quickly or at all, creating a significant gap in care during a crucial developmental period. CONCLUSION: The case is made for further routinization of ongoing developmental screening in pediatric oncology care.

Reducing antibiotic use for acute sinusitis in children.

Overview of: Shaikh N, Hoberman A, Shope TR, et al. Identifying children likely to benefit from antibiotics for acute sinusitis: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2023;330:349-58.

Pharmaceutical company payments to NHS trusts.

Overview of: Ozieranski P, Saghy E, Mulinari S. Pharmaceutical industry payments to NHS trusts in England: a four-year analysis of the Disclosure UK database. PLoS One 2023;18:e0290022.

Donanemab in early symptomatic Alzheimer's disease.

Overview of: Sims JR, Zimmer JA, Evans CD, et al. Donanemab in early symptomatic Alzheimer disease: The TRAILBLAZER-ALZ 2 randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2023;330:512-27.

BRCA awareness and testing experience in the UK Jewish population: a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: 1 in 40 UK Jewish individuals carry a pathogenic variant in BRCA1/BRCA2. Traditional testing criteria miss half of carriers, and so population genetic testing is being piloted for Jewish people in England. There has been no qualitative research into the factors influencing BRCA awareness and testing experience in this group. This study aimed to explore these and inform improvements for the implementation of population genetic testing. METHODS: Qualitative study of UK Jewish adults who have undergone BRCA testing. We conducted one-to-one semistructured interviews via telephone or video call using a predefined topic guide, until sufficient information power was reached. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and interpreted using applied thematic analysis. RESULTS: 32 individuals were interviewed (28 carriers, 4 non-carriers). We interpreted five themes intersecting across six time points of the testing pathway: (1) individual differences regarding personal/family history of cancer, demographics and personal attitudes/approach; (2) healthcare professionals' support; (3) pathway access and integration; (4) nature of family/partner relationships; and (5) Jewish community factors. Testing was largely triggered by connecting information to a personal/family history of cancer. No participants reported decision regret, although there was huge variation in satisfaction. Suggestions were given around increasing UK Jewish community awareness, making information and support services personally relevant and proactive case management of carriers. CONCLUSIONS: There is a need to improve UK Jewish community BRCA awareness and to highlight personal relevance of testing for individuals without a personal/family history of cancer. Traditional testing criteria caused multiple issues regarding test access and experience. Carriers want information and support services tailored to their individual circumstances.