Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 534
Filter
1.
J. bras. nefrol ; 46(2): e20230036, Apr.-June 2024. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1550489

ABSTRACT

Abstract Introduction: Cardiovascular disease is an important cause of death among patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Valve calcification is a predictor of cardiovascular mortality and coronary artery disease. Objective: To assess heart valve disease frequency, associated factors, and progression in CKD patients. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study on 291 CKD patients at Hospital das Clínicas de Pernambuco. Inclusion criteria were age ≥ 18 with CKD and valve disease, while those on conservative management or with missing data were excluded. Clinical and laboratory variables were compared, and patients were categorized by dialysis duration (<5 years; 5-10 years; >10 years). Statistical tests, including chi-square, Fisher's exact, ANOVA, and Kruskal-Wallis, were employed as needed. Simple and multivariate binary regression models were used to analyze valve disease associations with dialysis duration. Significance was defined as p < 0.05. Results: Mitral valve disease was present in 82.5% (240) of patients, followed by aortic valve disease (65.6%; 86). Over time, 106 (36.4%) patients developed valve disease. No significant association was found between aortic, pulmonary, mitral, or tricuspid valve disease and dialysis duration. Secondary hyperparathyroidism was the sole statistically significant factor for mitral valve disease in the regression model (OR 2.59 [95% CI: 1.09-6.18]; p = 0.031). Conclusion: CKD patients on renal replacement therapy exhibit a high frequency of valve disease, particularly mitral and aortic valve disease. However, no link was established between dialysis duration and valve disease occurrence or progression.


Resumo Introdução: Doenças cardiovasculares são uma causa significativa de morte em pacientes com Doença Renal Crônica (DRC). A calcificação valvar é preditor de mortalidade cardiovascular e doença arterial coronariana. Objetivo: Avaliar a frequência, fatores associados e progressão de valvopatias em pacientes com DRC. Métodos: Coorte retrospectiva com 291 pacientes ambulatoriais no Hospital das Clínicas de Pernambuco. Inclusão: ≥18 anos com DRC e valvopatia; exclusão: tratamento conservador ou dados incompletos. Variáveis clínicas e laboratoriais foram comparadas e categorizadas por tempo de terapia dialítica (TTD): <5 anos, 5-10 anos, >10 anos. Foram aplicados os testes Qui-quadrado, exato de Fisher, ANOVA, Kruskal-Wallis. Associação entre valvopatia e TTD foi avaliada por regressão binária. Significância foi definida como p < 0,05. Resultados: A valvopatia mitral foi encontrada em 82,5% (240) dos casos, seguida da aórtica (65,6%; 86). Houve progressão da doença valvar em 106 (36,4%) pacientes. Não houve associação entre valvopatias aórtica, pulmonar, mitral ou tricúspide e TTD. Hiperparatireoidismo secundário foi a única variável explicativa significativa na regressão para valvopatia mitral (OR 2,59 [IC95%: 1,09-6,18]; p = 0,031). Conclusão: Encontramos alta frequência de valvopatias, especialmente mitral e aórtica, aem pacientes com DRC. Não houve associação entre TTD e valvopatia.

2.
Ann Cardiothorac Surg ; 13(3): 236-243, 2024 May 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38841088

ABSTRACT

For decades, surgeons have recognized the risk of prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) when treating aortic stenosis (AS) with surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). The concept of PPM-or placing a valve that is too small for the cardiac output requirements of the patient-has been associated with worse patient outcomes, including increased risk of death. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has become the standard treatment for most patients with severe symptomatic AS and is associated with improved hemodynamics and lower risks of PPM. Larger surgical valves, stentless, and sutureless technology, and surgical aortic annulus enlargement (AAE) have been employed to avoid severe PPM. However, especially in the small aortic annulus (SAA), TAVR may provide a benefit. Understanding who is at risk for PPM requires preplanning, and cardiac-gated computed tomography (CT) imaging is the standard of care when considering TAVR. It should be standard for all patients with AS. Once SAA is identified, the risk of PPM can be calculated, and an informed decision made on whether to proceed with SAVR or TAVR. In the current TAVR era, younger patients are treated with TAVR driven by patient preference, but with little long-term data to support the practice. Selecting the best valve for the patient is a multifactorial decision often nuanced by anatomical considerations, hemodynamic and durability expectations, and decisions regarding lifetime management that may include placing a second valve. Although PPM may be only one of the factors to consider, the association with elevated mean gradients and worse outcomes certainly makes TAVR a good solution for many patients.

3.
Am J Cardiol ; 2024 Jun 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38897268

ABSTRACT

Tricuspid valve replacement (TVR) with mechanical versus tissue valves remains a controversial subject. To evaluate the long-term effects of types of valves on patient-relevant outcomes, we performed a systematic review with meta-analysis of reconstructed time-to-event data of studies published by March 15, 2024 (according to PRISMA). Twenty-one studies met our eligibility criteria and included 7,166 patients (mechanical: 2,495 patients, 34.8%). Patients who underwent mechanical TVR had lower risk of death in comparison with those who received a tissue valve (HR 0.77; 95%CI 0.70-0.84, P<0.001). Mechanical TVR was associated with lifetime gain as evidence by the restricted mean survival time which was 2.2 years longer in patients who underwent TVR with mechanical valves (12.4 years vs. 10.2 years, P<0.001). Our landmark analysis for reoperations revealed the following: from the timepoint 0 to 7 years, we found no difference in the risk of reoperation between mechanical and tissues valves (HR 0.98; 95%CI 0.60-1.61, P=0.946); however, from the timepoint 7 years onwards, we found that mechanical TVR had a lower risk of reoperation in the follow-up (HR 0.24; 95%CI 0.08-0.72, P=0.001). Meta-regression analysis demonstrated a modulating effect of atrial fibrillation on the association between mechanical valves and mortality; HRs for all-cause death tended to decrease in the presence of populations with larger proportion of atrial fibrillation (P=0.018). In conclusion, our results suggest that TVR with mechanical valves, whenever considered clinically reasonable and accepted by patients as an option, can offer a better long-term survival and lower risk of reoperation in the long run.

4.
Circulation ; 2024 Jun 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38881493

ABSTRACT

Valvular heart disease is a common cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide and has no effective medical therapy. Severe disease is managed with valve replacement procedures, which entail high health care-related costs and postprocedural morbidity and mortality. Robust ongoing research programs have elucidated many important molecular pathways contributing to primary valvular heart disease. However, there remain several key challenges inherent in translating research on valvular heart disease to viable molecular targets that can progress through the clinical trials pathway and effectively prevent or modify the course of these common conditions. In this scientific statement, we review the basic cellular structures of the human heart valves and discuss how these structures change in primary valvular heart disease. We focus on the most common primary valvular heart diseases, including calcific aortic stenosis, bicuspid aortic valves, mitral valve prolapse, and rheumatic heart disease, and outline the fundamental molecular discoveries contributing to each. We further outline potential therapeutic molecular targets for primary valvular heart disease and discuss key knowledge gaps that might serve as future research priorities.

5.
Circ Cardiovasc Interv ; : e013558, 2024 May 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38785079

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Elevated aortic valve gradients are common after transcatheter aortic valve implantation for degenerated surgical aortic valve replacement bioprostheses, but their clinical impact is uncertain. METHODS: A total of 12 122 patients who underwent transcatheter aortic valve implantation-in-surgical aortic valve replacement from November 2011 to December 2019 in the Society of Thoracic Surgery/American College of Cardiology Transvalvular Therapeutics Registry were included. The primary outcome was a composite of 1-year all-cause mortality, stroke, myocardial infarction, or valve reintervention. Secondary outcomes included 1-year all-cause mortality, readmission, and change from baseline 12-question self-administered Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire-Overall Summary Score. Due to nonlinearity observed with restricted cubic splines analysis, a Cox regression analysis with aortic valve mean gradient modeled as a spline-continuous variable (with 20 mm Hg as a cutoff) was used to study the 1-year composite outcome and mortality. RESULTS: The composite outcome occurred most frequently in patients with aortic valve mean gradient ≥30 and <10 mm Hg, as compared with those with 10 to 20 and 20 to 30 mm Hg ranges (unadjusted rates, 13.9%, 12.1%, 7.5%, and 6.5%, respectively; P=0.002). When the mean aortic valve gradient was ≥20 mm Hg, higher gradients were associated with greater risk of the 1-year composite outcome (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.02 [1.02-1.03] per mm Hg; P<0.001) and 1-year mortality (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.02 [1.00-1.03] per mm Hg; P=0.007). Whereas when the mean aortic valve gradient was <20 mm Hg, higher gradients were not significantly associated with the composite outcome (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.99 [0.98-1.003] per mm Hg; P=0.12) but were associated with lower 1-year mortality (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.98 [0.97-0.99] per mm Hg; P=0.007). CONCLUSIONS: The relationship between postprocedural aortic valve mean gradient after transcatheter aortic valve implantation-in-surgical aortic valve replacement and clinical outcomes is complex and nonlinear, with relatively greater adverse events occurring at low and high gradient extremes. Further study of factors mediating the relationship between postprocedural gradients and clinical outcomes, including low-flow states, is necessary.

6.
Open Heart ; 11(1)2024 May 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38782544

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Pre-eclampsia complicates 3-5% of pregnancies worldwide and is associated with adverse outcomes for the mother and the offspring. Pre-eclampsia and heart failure have common risk factors, including hypertension, obesity and diabetes. It is not known whether heart failure increases the risk of pre-eclampsia. This study examines whether pregestational heart failure increases the risk of pre-eclampsia. METHODS: In a registry-based case-cohort study that included all pregnancies in Sweden (n=3 125 527) between 1990 and 2019, all pregnancies with pre-eclampsia (n=90 354) were identified and up to five control pregnancies (n=451 466) for each case were chosen, matched on the mother's birth year. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the impact of heart failure on the risk of pre-eclampsia, with adjustment for established risk factors and other cardiovascular diseases. RESULTS: Women with heart failure had no increased risk for pre-eclampsia, OR 1.02 (95% CI 0.69 to 1.50). Women with valvular heart disease had an increased OR of preterm pre-eclampsia, with an adjusted OR of 1.78 (95% CI 1.04 to 3.06). Hypertension and diabetes were independent risk factors for pre-eclampsia. Obesity, multifetal pregnancies, in vitro fertilisation, older age, Nordic origin and nulliparity were more common among women who developed pre-eclampsia compared with controls. CONCLUSION: Women with heart failure do not have an increased risk of pre-eclampsia. However, women with valvular heart disease prior to pregnancy have an increased risk of developing preterm pre-eclampsia independent of other known risk factors.


Subject(s)
Pre-Eclampsia , Registries , Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Pre-Eclampsia/epidemiology , Pre-Eclampsia/diagnosis , Sweden/epidemiology , Adult , Risk Factors , Risk Assessment/methods , Pregnancy Complications, Cardiovascular/epidemiology , Incidence , Heart Failure/epidemiology , Heart Failure/diagnosis , Heart Failure/etiology , Follow-Up Studies , Case-Control Studies , Retrospective Studies
7.
J Am Heart Assoc ; 13(9): e033872, 2024 May 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38700000

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The mortality risk attributable to moderate aortic stenosis (AS) remains incompletely characterized and has historically been underestimated. We aim to evaluate the association between moderate AS and all-cause death, comparing it with no/mild AS (in a general referral population and in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction). METHODS AND RESULTS: A systematic review and pooled meta-analysis of Kaplan-Meier-derived reconstructed time-to-event data of studies published by June 2023 was conducted to evaluate survival outcomes among patients with moderate AS in comparison with individuals with no/mild AS. Ten studies were included, encompassing a total of 409 680 patients (11 527 with moderate AS and 398 153 with no/mild AS). In the overall population, the 15-year overall survival rate was 23.3% (95% CI, 19.1%-28.3%) in patients with moderate AS and 58.9% (95% CI, 58.1%-59.7%) in patients with no/mild aortic stenosis (hazard ratio [HR], 2.55 [95% CI, 2.46-2.64]; P<0.001). In patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, the 10-year overall survival rate was 15.5% (95% CI, 10.0%-24.0%) in patients with moderate AS and 37.3% (95% CI, 36.2%-38.5%) in patients with no/mild AS (HR, 1.83 [95% CI, 1.69-2.0]; P<0.001). In both populations (overall and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction), these differences correspond to significant lifetime loss associated with moderate AS during follow-up (4.4 years, P<0.001; and 1.9 years, P<0.001, respectively). A consistent pattern of elevated mortality rate associated with moderate AS in sensitivity analyses of matched studies was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Moderate AS was associated with higher risk of death and lifetime loss compared with patients with no/mild AS.


Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Stenosis , Humans , Aortic Valve Stenosis/mortality , Aortic Valve Stenosis/physiopathology , Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery , Severity of Illness Index , Survival Rate/trends , Heart Failure/mortality , Heart Failure/physiopathology , Risk Assessment/methods , Risk Factors , Stroke Volume/physiology , Cause of Death , Time Factors , Female , Aged , Male
9.
Heart ; 2024 Apr 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38649264

ABSTRACT

Valvular heart disease, including calcific or degenerative aortic stenosis (AS), is increasingly prevalent among the older adult population. Over the last few decades, treatment of severe AS has been revolutionised following the development of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Despite improvements in outcomes, older adults with competing comorbidities and geriatric syndromes have suboptimal quality of life outcomes, highlighting the cumulative vulnerability that persists despite valve replacement. Sarcopenia, characterised by loss of muscle strength, mass and function, affects 21%-70% of older adults with AS. Sarcopenia is an independent predictor of short-term and long-term outcomes after TAVR and should be incorporated as a prognostic marker in preprocedural planning. Early diagnosis and treatment of sarcopenia may reduce morbidity and mortality and improve quality of life following TAVR. The adverse effects of sarcopenia can be mitigated through resistance training and optimisation of nutritional status. This is most efficacious when administered before sarcopenia has progressed to advanced stages. Management should be individualised based on the patient's wishes/preferences, care goals and physical capability. Exercise during the preoperative waiting period may be safe and effective in most patients with severe AS. However, future studies are needed to establish the benefits of prehabilitation in improving quality of life outcomes after TAVR procedures.

10.
Arch Cardiovasc Dis ; 117(5): 343-350, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38644069

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are currently the leading cause of maternal death in Western countries. Although multidisciplinary cardio-obstetric teams are recommended to improve the management of pregnant women with CVD, data supporting this approach are scarce. AIMS: To describe the characteristics and outcomes of pregnant patients with CVD managed within the cardio-obstetric programme of a tertiary centre. METHODS: We included every pregnant patient with history of CVD managed by our cardio-obstetric team between June 2017 and December 2019, and collected all major cardiovascular events (death, heart failure, acute coronary syndromes, stroke, endocarditis and aortic dissection) that occurred during pregnancy, peripartum and the following year. RESULTS: We included 209 consecutive pregnancies in 202 patients. CVDs were predominantly valvular heart diseases (37.8%), rhythm disorders (26.8%), and adult congenital heart diseases (22.5%). Altogether, 47.4% were classified modified World Health Organization (mWHO)>II, 66.5% had CARdiac disease in PREGnancy score (CARPREG II)≥2 and 80 pregnancies (38.3%) were delivered by caesarean section. Major cardiovascular events occurred in 16 pregnancies (7.7%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.5-12.2) during pregnancy and in three others (1.5%, 95% CI 0.3-4.1) during 1-year follow-up. Most events (63.1%) occurred in the 16.3% of patients with unknown CVD before pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS: The management of pregnant patients with CVD within a cardio-obstetric team seems encouraging as we found a relatively low rate of cardiovascular events compared to the high-risk profile of our population. However, most of the remaining events occurred in patients without cardiac monitoring before pregnancy.


Subject(s)
Patient Care Team , Pregnancy Complications, Cardiovascular , Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications, Cardiovascular/epidemiology , Pregnancy Complications, Cardiovascular/therapy , Pregnancy Complications, Cardiovascular/diagnosis , Pregnancy Complications, Cardiovascular/mortality , Pregnancy Complications, Cardiovascular/physiopathology , Adult , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated , Risk Assessment , Retrospective Studies , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Cardiovascular Diseases/diagnosis , Cardiovascular Diseases/therapy , Cardiovascular Diseases/mortality , Young Adult
11.
Heart ; 110(13): 908-915, 2024 Jun 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38627021

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Guidelines for the management of cardiovascular disease (CVD) recommend preconception risk stratification and counselling in all women of childbearing age. We assessed the provision of preconception counselling (PCC) among women of reproductive age attending general cardiology outpatient clinics over a 12-month period in two large health boards in Scotland. METHODS AND RESULTS: Electronic health records were reviewed and data on patient demographics, cardiac diagnoses, medication use and the content of documented discussions regarding PCC were recorded. Women were classified according to the modified WHO (mWHO) risk stratification system. Among 1650 women with a cardiac diagnosis included (1 January 2016-31 December 2016), the mean age was 32.7±8.6 years, and 1574 (95.4%) attended a consultant-led clinic. A quarter (402, 24.4%) were prescribed at least one potentially fetotoxic cardiovascular medication. PCC was documented in 10.3% of women who were not pregnant or were unable to conceive at the time of review (159/1548). The distribution of mWHO classification, and proportion of patients within each mWHO category who received any form of PCC, was 15.0% and 6.0% in mWHO class I, 20.2% and 8.7% in mWHO class II, 22.6% and 10.6% in mWHO class II-III, 9.5% and 15.7% in mWHO class III and 3.9% and 19.7% in mWHO class IV. CONCLUSION: PCC is documented infrequently in women of reproductive age with CVD in the general outpatient setting. Education relating to the risks of cardiac disease in pregnancy for clinicians and patients, and tools to support healthcare providers in delivering PCC, is important.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases , Counseling , Preconception Care , Humans , Female , Preconception Care/methods , Scotland/epidemiology , Adult , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control , Risk Assessment/methods , Pregnancy , Retrospective Studies , Young Adult
12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38688452

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Randomized controlled trials comparing transcatheter aortic valve implantation with surgical aortic valve replacement demonstrate conflicting evidence, particularly in low-risk patients. We aim to reevaluate the evidence using trial sequential analysis, balancing type I and II errors, and compare with conventional meta-analysis. METHODS: Databases were searched for randomized controlled trials, which were divided into higher-risk and lower-risk randomized controlled trials according to a pragmatic risk classification. Primary outcomes were death and a composite end point of death or disabling stroke assessed at 1 year and maximum follow-up. Conventional meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis were performed, and the required information size was calculated considering a type I error of 5% and a power of 90%. RESULTS: Eight randomized controlled trials (n = 5274 higher-risk and 3661 lower-risk patients) were included. Higher-risk trials showed no significant reduction in death at 1 year with transcatheter aortic valve implantation (relative risk, 0.93, 95% CI, 0.81-1.08, P = .345). Lower-risk trials suggested lower death risk on conventional meta-analysis (relative risk, 0.67, 95% CI, 0.47-0.96, P = .031), but trial sequential analysis indicated potential spurious evidence (P = .116), necessitating more data for conclusive benefit (required information size = 5944 [59.8%]). For death or disabling stroke at 1 year, higher-risk trials lacked evidence (relative risk, 0.90, 95% CI, 0.79-1.02, P = .108). In lower-risk trials, transcatheter aortic valve implantation indicated lower risk in conventional meta-analysis (relative risk, 0.68, 95% CI, 0.50-0.93, P = .014), but trial sequential analysis suggested potential spurious evidence (P = .053), necessitating more data for conclusive benefit (required information size = 5122 [69.4%]). Follow-up results provided inconclusive evidence for both primary outcomes across risk categories. CONCLUSIONS: Conventional meta-analysis methods may have prematurely declared an early reduction of negative outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation when compared with surgical aortic valve replacement.

13.
Pediatr Cardiol ; 2024 Mar 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38478047

ABSTRACT

While quadricuspid morphology is commonly observed in truncal valves, quadricuspid aortic valves (QAV) are rare and their natural history is not well described. This retrospective study of 37 patients describes the diagnostic associations and morphologic variability of QAVs in children (median age at diagnosis 4.3 y IQR 0-12 y). Associated congenital heart diseases were present in 54% (most commonly tetralogy of Fallot (TOF) and valvar pulmonary stenosis). Among patients with isolated QAV, 11 had genetic syndrome and 5 had skeletal anomalies. Valve morphology was most commonly type B (41%) and A (35%; Hurvitz and Roberts). Dilated aortic root (Z ≥ 2) was present in 5 and dilated ascending aorta in 9 patients at diagnosis. All patients with type C (n = 3) and G (n = 1) had aortic dilation. At diagnosis, >mild AR was rare (n = 1), mild regurgitation was common (n = 12, 32%), >mild AS was rare (n = 2), and mild AS was uncommon (n = 4). Over a median follow-up of 3.3y (IQR 0.9-11y), progression of AR was seen in 2 patients and progression of aortic root or ascending aorta dilation (increase in Z score by ≥ 2) was seen in 5 patients. In conclusion, QAV is a rare congenital anomaly and about half of the cases are found in hearts that are otherwise structurally normal. A relatively high prevalence is seen in patients with TOF, pulmonary stenosis, skeletal deformities, and genetic syndromes. Meticulous evaluation of aortic valve morphology should be conducted on echocardiograms performed for these indications.

14.
Inn Med (Heidelb) ; 65(5): 425-430, 2024 May.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38436690

ABSTRACT

Currently, there is no specific medication approved for the treatment of valvular heart disease per se. Except for secondary mitral valve insufficiency and tricuspid valve insufficiency in pulmonary hypertension, drug therapy for higher-grade valvular heart disease is limited to diuretic therapy for symptom control. Conservative therapy for comorbidities and potential heart failure can be beneficial regardless of the specific valve lesion. In cases of aortic valve stenosis or insufficiency, controlling arterial hypertension is important. Patients with mitral valve stenosis benefit from rhythm and rate control. Diuretics can help reduce regurgitant volume in patients with primary mitral valve insufficiency and tricuspid valve insufficiency. In addition to drug therapy, maintaining functional capacity is crucial for the outcome of patients. Therefore, it is recommended to engage in active physical activity whenever possible, despite the presence of valvular heart disease.


Subject(s)
Heart Valve Diseases , Humans , Heart Valve Diseases/drug therapy , Adult , Conservative Treatment/methods , Diuretics/therapeutic use
15.
J Am Heart Assoc ; 13(7): e033176, 2024 Apr 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38533939

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: It remains controversial whether prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) impacts long-term outcomes after surgical aortic valve replacement. We aimed to evaluate the association of PPM with mortality, rehospitalizations, and aortic valve reinterventions. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed a systematic review with meta-analysis of reconstructed time-to-event data of studies published by March 2023 (according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses). Sixty-five studies met our eligibility criteria and included 122 989 patients (any PPM: 68 332 patients, 55.6%). At 25 years of follow-up, the survival rates were 11.8% and 20.6% in patients with and without any PPM, respectively (hazard ratio [HR], 1.16 [95% CI, 1.13-1.18], P<0.001). At 20 years of follow-up, the survival rates were 19.5%, 12.1%, and 8.8% in patients with no, moderate, and severe PPM, respectively (moderate versus no PPM: HR, 1.09 [95% CI, 1.06-1.11], P<0.001; severe versus no PPM: HR, 1.29 [95% CI, 1.24-1.35], P<0.001). PPM was associated with higher risk of cardiac death, heart failure-related hospitalizations, and aortic valve reinterventions over time (P<0.001). Statistically significant associations between PPM and worse survival were observed regardless of valve type (bioprosthetic versus mechanical valves), contemporary PPM definitions unadjusted and adjusted for body mass index, and PPM quantification method (in vitro, in vivo, Doppler echocardiography). Our meta-regression analysis revealed that populations with more women tend to have higher HRs for all-cause death associated with PPM. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present study suggest that any degree of PPM is associated with poorer long-term outcomes following surgical aortic valve replacement and provide support for implementation of preventive strategies to avoid PPM after surgical aortic valve replacement.


Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Stenosis , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation , Heart Valve Prosthesis , Humans , Female , Aortic Valve/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Valve/surgery , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/methods , Aortic Valve Stenosis/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery , Aortic Valve Stenosis/etiology , Prosthesis Failure , Treatment Outcome , Heart Valve Prosthesis/adverse effects , Risk Factors , Prosthesis Design
17.
Open Heart ; 11(1)2024 Feb 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38417913

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The clinical outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in patients with aortic stenosis (AS) and concomitant active cancer remain insufficiently explored. This study aimed to assess the midterm outcomes of TAVR in patients diagnosed with AS and active cancer. METHODS: Data from the OCEAN-TAVI, a prospective Japanese registry of TAVR procedures, was analysed to compare prognoses and clinical outcomes in patients with and without active cancer at the time of TAVR. RESULTS: Of the 2336 patients who underwent TAVR from October 2013 to July 2017, 89 patients (3.8%) had active cancer, whereas 2247 did not. Among patients with active cancer, 49 had limited-stage cancer (stage 1 or 2). The prevalent cancers identified before TAVR were colon (21%), prostate (18%), lung (15%), liver (11%) and breast (9%). Although the periprocedural complications and 30-day mortality rates were comparable between the groups, the 3-year survival rate after TAVR was notably lower in patients with active cancer (64.7%) than in those without active cancer (74.7%; p=0.016). Nevertheless, the 3-year survival rate of patients with limited-stage cancer (stage 1 or 2) did not significantly differ from those without cancer (70.6% vs 74.7%, p=0.50). CONCLUSIONS: The patients with active cancer exhibited significantly reduced midterm survival rates. However, no distinct disparity existed in those with limited-stage cancer (stage 1 or 2). Although TAVR is a viable treatment in patients with AS with active cancer, the type and stage of cancer and prognosis should be carefully weighed in the decision-making process.


Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Stenosis , Neoplasms , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement , Male , Humans , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/methods , Treatment Outcome , Prospective Studies , Time Factors , Aortic Valve Stenosis/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery , Neoplasms/diagnosis
18.
Herz ; 49(2): 156-164, 2024 Mar.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38240775

ABSTRACT

Aortic valve stenosis is one of the most frequent valvular heart diseases requiring treatment in industrialized countries. The symptom onset is associated with a significantly increased mortality, so that there is a clear indication for treatment in patients with severe, symptomatic aortic valve stenosis; however, data on the optimal treatment of patients with asymptomatic aortic valve stenosis are scarce. Smaller studies in the field of cardiac surgery suggest that early surgical valve replacement is superior to a conservative approach. For this reason, the results of additional adequately powered randomized trials are awaited with great interest. In this year numerous long-term results from randomized comparisons of the two available treatment options (surgical versus transcatheter aortic valve replacement) were published, which will further guide the heart team to find the best treatment approach for each individual.


Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Stenosis , Heart Valve Diseases , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation , Heart Valve Prosthesis , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement , Humans , Aortic Valve Stenosis/diagnosis , Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery , Heart Valve Diseases/surgery , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/adverse effects , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/methods , Aortic Valve/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Valve/surgery , Treatment Outcome , Risk Factors
19.
Circ Cardiovasc Interv ; 17(2): e013424, 2024 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38235546

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Limited data exist regarding the impact of mitral annular calcification (MAC) on outcomes of transcatheter edge-to-edge repair for mitral regurgitation (MR). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 968 individuals (median age, 79 [interquartile range, 70-86] years; 60.0% males; 51.8% with functional MR) who underwent an isolated, first-time intervention. Stratified by MAC extent per baseline transthoracic echocardiogram, the cohort was assessed for residual MR, functional status, all-cause mortality, heart failure hospitalizations, and mitral reinterventions post-procedure. RESULTS: Patients with above-mild MAC (n=101; 10.4%) were older and more likely to be female, exhibited a greater burden of comorbidities, and presented more often with severe, primary MR. Procedural aspects and technical success rate were unaffected by MAC magnitude, as was the significant improvement from baseline in MR severity and functional status along the first postprocedural year. However, the persistence of above-moderate MR or functional classes III and IV at 1 year and the cumulative incidence of reinterventions at 2 years were overall more pronounced within the above-mild MAC group (significant MR or functional impairment, 44.7% versus 29.9%, P=0.060; reinterventions, 11.9% versus 6.2%, P=0.033; log-rank P=0.035). No link was demonstrated between MAC degree and the cumulative incidence or risk of mortality and mortality or heart failure hospitalizations. Differences in outcomes frequencies were mostly confined to the primary MR subgroup, in which patients with above-mild MAC also experienced earlier, more frequent 2-year heart failure hospitalizations (20.8% versus 9.6%; P=0.016; log-rank P=0.020). CONCLUSIONS: Mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair in patients with and without above-mild MAC is equally feasible and safe; however, its postprocedural course is less favorable among those with primary MR.


Subject(s)
Calcinosis , Heart Failure , Heart Valve Diseases , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation , Mitral Valve Insufficiency , Male , Humans , Female , Aged , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Mitral Valve/diagnostic imaging , Mitral Valve/surgery , Mitral Valve Insufficiency/diagnostic imaging , Mitral Valve Insufficiency/surgery , Calcinosis/diagnostic imaging , Calcinosis/surgery , Cardiac Catheterization
20.
Open Heart ; 11(1)2024 Jan 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38290732

ABSTRACT

AIM: To assess outcomes after cardiac surgery with biological valve replacement, valve repair or transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) in accordance with oral anticoagulant (OAC) treatment. METHODS: All patients in Sweden undergoing valvular intervention with AF were included. Associations between OAC exposure and cardiovascular (CV) events (composite of CV death, ischaemic stroke or systemic embolism) and major bleeding were investigated using Cox regression analysis. The analysis was separated in time periods of 0-3 and 3-12 months after discharge. RESULTS: 4730 patients were included in the first time period, 54.0% had received a surgical biological valve prosthesis, 23.8% valve repair and 22.2% TAVI. Exposure to warfarin (comparator) was 62.3%, to non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) 10.0% and to no OAC 27.7%. NOAC exposure was associated with similar risk of the composite CV outcome and major bleeding from 0 to 3 months. No OAC was associated with increased risk of the composite CV outcome (HR 1.71; 95% CI 1.26 to 2.32) and similar risk of major bleeding. Further analysis of the bioprosthetic valve replacement subgroup indicated increased risk of CV death when exposed to NOAC (HR 2.58; 95% CI 1.15 to 5.78) and no OAC (HR 2.82; 95% CI 1.65 to 4.82) compared with warfarin from 0 to 3 months. No differences were seen between 3 and 12 months. CONCLUSION: In this registry-based cohort study of patients with AF with severe valvular heart disease undergoing various valvular interventions, NOAC appears to be comparable with warfarin regarding efficacy and safety. Patients not receiving OAC had higher risk of CV events. NOAC was associated with increased CV death compared with warfarin in the surgical bioprosthetic valve replacement subgroup, illustrating the importance of being cautious when extrapolating data from one patient group to another. Further studies comparing NOAC and warfarin in the early postoperative phase are warranted, especially following surgical bioprosthetic valve replacement.


Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation , Brain Ischemia , Stroke , Thromboembolism , Humans , Warfarin , Atrial Fibrillation/complications , Atrial Fibrillation/diagnosis , Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy , Anticoagulants , Cohort Studies , Administration, Oral , Stroke/etiology , Hemorrhage/chemically induced , Thromboembolism/etiology , Thromboembolism/prevention & control
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...